Abstinence (is) Only *****



 Religions > Atheism > Abstinence (is) Only *****

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "quibbler"
Date: 04 Dec 2004 05:35:35 PM
Object: Abstinence (is) Only *****
I love how Abstinence assholes telegraph their moronic and closed-
minded bigotry by letting everyone know ahead of time that they refuse
to be reasonable or to consider any alternatives. Abstinence, or more
appropriately obstinacy is typical repug *****. Don't confuse them
with the fact that so called abstinence "education", despite it's
inaccurate and propagandistic scare-tactics, has been thoroughly
discredited as an effective means of preventing teen pregnancy or sexual
activity to a significant degree. Never mind the fact that George
W. Bush was a serial womanizer and never abstained from drugs and
alcohol in his youth. Never mind that his drunken ***** daughters open
their legs wider than the panama canal for any guy who has five minutes
to kill. These people are typical hypocrites.
They aren't even decent liars, which means that they aren't very
good at being Christian apologists either. After all, abstinence, as a
policy is about like saying, "Don't sin". Even in their theology they
maintain that it's impossible to never "sin". For example, Paul said in
Romans 3:23 that "all have sinned and fallen short" of perfection. If
they believed that ***** then they would have to acknowledge that
telling kids not to boink will probably be even less effective than
telling them not swear, or drive drunk, or smoke "tobacco", etc, etc.
It's basically a glorified Nancy Reagan "just say no" to getting
laid policy, which might work for fat, ugly fundamentalist dipshits like
themselves, but won't work for anyone who is cool or has a life.

Now let's imagine for a second that "Abstinence Only" was applied
to other areas of life. What if cops had a policy that said they could
only tell criminals to "abstain" from breaking the law, but could not
actually arrest anyone or take actions to prevent crimes from occurring.
Imagine if our military only begged Bin Laden to "please not fly planes
into our buildings", rather than trying to prevent him from doing it in
the first place. Well, that last case might not be such a great
example, because the criminally incompetent, fucktard Bush
administration essentially took no action to prevent Bin Laden from
attacking the US and cancelled Clinton's plans to *prevent* Bin Laden
from breathing (I.e. assassinating him). However, even the moronic and
corrupt Bush administration seemed to recognize the value to attempting
to preempt and prevent attacks from a guy named Saddam Hussein. But,
while they still obsess about non-existent Iraqi biochemical weapons of
mass destruction, they refuse to make the homeland secure from a
biochemical weapon called the AIDS virus, or other STDs because of their
idiotic opposition to teaching condom use and other safe sex practices.
That's par for the course when it comes to the Bush administration,
which has always been weak on actual homeland security, as they claim to
pursue imaginary weapons and bad guys, at great expense and loss of
life, on distant parts of the globe.

Unfortunately, their irresponsible abstinence only policy may get
more young Americans killed than even the 1400 American soldiers who
have perished in their reckless and illegal Iraqi invasion. Young kids
fed ridiculously wrong propaganda about 30% condom failure rates may not
recognize that, even then, 70% protection would be a shitload better
than having no protection at all. Their unamerican attempt to gag
teachers when it comes to talking about contraception will destroy the
lives of children who might otherwise have been saved.

The only thing requiring abstinence here is for fundamentalist
fuckwits to abstain from attempting to force their religious bigotry and
prudish perversions about sexuality onto public school children. If
they abstain from attempting to use federal resources to establish their
religious beliefs in the public forum then perhaps we can abstain from
convicting them of treason against the US Constitution and only hold
them civilly liable for the damage their policies will inflict upon
American youth.
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.

User: "Kathy"

Title: Re: Abstinence (is) Only ***** 05 Dec 2004 10:33:28 AM
"quibbler" <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1c1bf7a6293b0076989ab0@news.individual.net...

I love how Abstinence assholes telegraph their moronic and closed-
minded bigotry by letting everyone know ahead of time that they refuse
to be reasonable or to consider any alternatives. Abstinence, or more
appropriately obstinacy is typical repug *****. Don't confuse them
with the fact that so called abstinence "education", despite it's
inaccurate and propagandistic scare-tactics, has been thoroughly
discredited as an effective means of preventing teen pregnancy or sexual
activity to a significant degree. Never mind the fact that George
W. Bush was a serial womanizer and never abstained from drugs and
alcohol in his youth. Never mind that his drunken ***** daughters open
their legs wider than the panama canal for any guy who has five minutes
to kill. These people are typical hypocrites.

They aren't even decent liars, which means that they aren't very
good at being Christian apologists either. After all, abstinence, as a
policy is about like saying, "Don't sin". Even in their theology they
maintain that it's impossible to never "sin". For example, Paul said in
Romans 3:23 that "all have sinned and fallen short" of perfection. If
they believed that ***** then they would have to acknowledge that
telling kids not to boink will probably be even less effective than
telling them not swear, or drive drunk, or smoke "tobacco", etc, etc.

It's basically a glorified Nancy Reagan "just say no" to getting
laid policy, which might work for fat, ugly fundamentalist dipshits like
themselves, but won't work for anyone who is cool or has a life.

Now let's imagine for a second that "Abstinence Only" was applied
to other areas of life. What if cops had a policy that said they could
only tell criminals to "abstain" from breaking the law, but could not
actually arrest anyone or take actions to prevent crimes from occurring.
Imagine if our military only begged Bin Laden to "please not fly planes
into our buildings", rather than trying to prevent him from doing it in
the first place. Well, that last case might not be such a great
example, because the criminally incompetent, fucktard Bush
administration essentially took no action to prevent Bin Laden from
attacking the US and cancelled Clinton's plans to *prevent* Bin Laden
from breathing (I.e. assassinating him). However, even the moronic and
corrupt Bush administration seemed to recognize the value to attempting
to preempt and prevent attacks from a guy named Saddam Hussein. But,
while they still obsess about non-existent Iraqi biochemical weapons of
mass destruction, they refuse to make the homeland secure from a
biochemical weapon called the AIDS virus, or other STDs because of their
idiotic opposition to teaching condom use and other safe sex practices.
That's par for the course when it comes to the Bush administration,
which has always been weak on actual homeland security, as they claim to
pursue imaginary weapons and bad guys, at great expense and loss of
life, on distant parts of the globe.

Unfortunately, their irresponsible abstinence only policy may get
more young Americans killed than even the 1400 American soldiers who
have perished in their reckless and illegal Iraqi invasion. Young kids
fed ridiculously wrong propaganda about 30% condom failure rates may not
recognize that, even then, 70% protection would be a shitload better
than having no protection at all. Their unamerican attempt to gag
teachers when it comes to talking about contraception will destroy the
lives of children who might otherwise have been saved.

The only thing requiring abstinence here is for fundamentalist
fuckwits to abstain from attempting to force their religious bigotry and
prudish perversions about sexuality onto public school children. If
they abstain from attempting to use federal resources to establish their
religious beliefs in the public forum then perhaps we can abstain from
convicting them of treason against the US Constitution and only hold
them civilly liable for the damage their policies will inflict upon
American youth.

Abstinence education is an oxymoron. It is like intelligent design in that
it requires no knowledge beyond the statement of its existence. The "red
states" love both because neither requires any thought process or learning.
The entire abstinence curriculum can be summed up with "Sex - don't do it".
The entire ID curriculum can be summed up with "The world - Goddidit".
There is a moratorium on brains. (appologies to Ayn Rand)
Kathy aa #1802
.

User: "Steve Knight"

Title: Re: Abstinence (is) Only ***** 04 Dec 2004 08:03:39 PM
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 16:35:35 -0700, quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com>
wrote:

I love how Abstinence assholes telegraph their moronic and closed-
minded bigotry by letting everyone know ahead of time that they refuse
to be reasonable or to consider any alternatives.

It's your typical head in the sand clueless reality. They stand on
a soapbox and screech, 'Don't *****!' Like words are going to change a
billion years of evolution.
Fucking is the most basic, fundamental instinct of all life and the
best they can come up with is not doing it.
Warlord Steve
BAAWA
www.sonic.net/~wooly
.
User: "johac"

Title: Re: Abstinence (is) Only ***** 05 Dec 2004 02:34:18 AM
In article <a1r4r0psq52k7tllf6naih6n3dumkl9ulv@4ax.com>,
Steve Knight <wooly@sonic.net> wrote:

On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 16:35:35 -0700, quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com>
wrote:

I love how Abstinence assholes telegraph their moronic and closed-
minded bigotry by letting everyone know ahead of time that they refuse
to be reasonable or to consider any alternatives.


It's your typical head in the sand clueless reality. They stand on
a soapbox and screech, 'Don't *****!' Like words are going to change a
billion years of evolution.

Fucking is the most basic, fundamental instinct of all life and the
best they can come up with is not doing it.

In a post some time ago, I compared those who preached abstinence to
King Canute trying to hold back the tide. The biological urge to
reproduce is strong and is strongest in healthy young animals.
Reproducing early and often makes sense from an evolutionary
perspective. Most animals start fucking as soon as they are physically
able.
They can wave their bibles and crosses all that they want, but they
can't change what 3.5-4 billion years of evolution has made us.


Warlord Steve
BAAWA
www.sonic.net/~wooly

--
John Hachmann aa #1782
Which raises the question: Can a people that believes more fervently
in theVirgin Birth than in evolution still be called an Enlightened
nation?-Garry Wills, New York Times 11/04/04
.

User: "Al Klein"

Title: Re: Abstinence (is) Only ***** 04 Dec 2004 11:23:11 PM
On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 02:03:39 GMT, Steve Knight <wooly@sonic.net> said
in alt.atheism:

On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 16:35:35 -0700, quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com>
wrote:

I love how Abstinence assholes telegraph their moronic and closed-
minded bigotry by letting everyone know ahead of time that they refuse
to be reasonable or to consider any alternatives.


It's your typical head in the sand clueless reality. They stand on
a soapbox and screech, 'Don't *****!' Like words are going to change a
billion years of evolution.

Fucking is the most basic, fundamental instinct of all life and the
best they can come up with is not doing it.

I think there's a Darwin Award in there somewhere.
--
"Properly read, the Bible is the most potent force for atheism ever conceived."
- Isaac Asimov
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Abstinence (is) Only ***** 06 Dec 2004 03:23:59 PM
Steve Knight wrote:

On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 16:35:35 -0700, quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com>
wrote:

I love how Abstinence assholes telegraph their moronic and

closed-

minded bigotry by letting everyone know ahead of time that they

refuse

to be reasonable or to consider any alternatives.


It's your typical head in the sand clueless reality. They stand on
a soapbox and screech, 'Don't *****!' Like words are going to change a
billion years of evolution.

Fucking is the most basic, fundamental instinct of all life and

the

best they can come up with is not doing it.

Warlord Steve
BAAWA
www.sonic.net/~wooly

Would "Don't ***** 'till you grow up" be more effective?
Michael
.
User: "Kathy"

Title: Re: Abstinence (is) Only ***** 06 Dec 2004 06:15:38 PM
<mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1102368239.121773.272000@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...


Steve Knight wrote:

On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 16:35:35 -0700, quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com>
wrote:

I love how Abstinence assholes telegraph their moronic and

closed-

minded bigotry by letting everyone know ahead of time that they

refuse

to be reasonable or to consider any alternatives.


It's your typical head in the sand clueless reality. They stand on
a soapbox and screech, 'Don't *****!' Like words are going to change a
billion years of evolution.

Fucking is the most basic, fundamental instinct of all life and

the

best they can come up with is not doing it.

Warlord Steve
BAAWA
www.sonic.net/~wooly

Would "Don't ***** 'till you grow up" be more effective?


Michael

No. Our instinct is to have sex as soon as we hit puberty. We're lucky
most kids even wait til they are 18 let alone til they are married. Areas
where the abstinence level is high most often have more teenage marriages,
and the resulting divorces a few years later.
Kahty aa #1802
.



User: "AgentOrangeCleaner"

Title: Re: Abstinence (is) Only ***** 04 Dec 2004 05:58:44 PM
Those abstinence chicks are fucking hot!
.
User: "quibbler"

Title: Re: Abstinence (is) Only ***** 04 Dec 2004 06:49:16 PM
In article <Uassd.60677$Vk6.3859@twister.nyc.rr.com>,

says...

Those abstinence chicks are fucking hot!

Doubtful. Even so they are little more than teases. I'd rather have a
naughty girl who will actually do the naughty. BTW, Mandy Moore was
pretty hot in the movie "Saved". It's a pretty good parody of Christian
***** for any who have not seen it. If you live in the bible belt
then you've essentially already seen the movie. It's called, "your
life".
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER