| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
28 Mar 2005 11:47:58 AM |
| Object: |
ACLU sues for gays' benefits |
Why would any man need another man to provide him with health care
benefits? The advantage of gay partnerships is that there are no
children at home that need attending. Let each man provide his own
health care, just like single straight people do. This notion that one
guy stays home and plays "Donna Reed" while the other one goes to work
should not become a burden on the American health care system. The
people of Michigan (and many other states) have spoken; No gay
marriage. Stop seeking "special" dispensations just because your
different.
http://www.freep.com/news/mich/gay22e_20050322.htm
Despite marriage ban, couples want health care
The American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit Monday asking the
courts to protect same-sex couples' health benefits in light of a state
constitutional ban on gay marriage.
In the suit, filed in Ingham County Circuit Court, the ACLU asked the
court to stipulate that the ban on gay marriage does not extend to
health care benefits for same-sex partners. The amendment, they said,
is ambiguous.
The ACLU filed the suit less than a week after state Attorney General
Mike Cox issued his legal interpretation about what effect the
amendment should have on health benefits. He concluded that the
amendment bans government agencies from extending benefits to same-sex
couples in any future contract negotiations.
.
|
|
| User: "SMITH29" |
|
| Title: Re: ACLU sues for gays' benefits |
30 Mar 2005 05:10:34 AM |
|
|
Gregory Gadow wrote:
SMITH29 wrote:
Gregory Gadow wrote:
J Young wrote:
Why would any man need another man to provide him with health care
benefits? The advantage of gay partnerships is that there are no
children at home that need attending.
Following your "logic", health care benefits of heterosexual marriage
should exist if and only if there are children. Correct?
xxxx
A part of marriage is procreation possibility which is not
mandatory.
Then why do you neo-cons insist that the whole point of marriage is
procreation?
xxxx
1. I'm not a neo-con.
2. I don't insist on procreation nor does the law.
If procreation is merely a possibility, and if couples who can
not or will not procreate can be married, why not allow same sex couples to
marry? You can't have it both ways without coming across as a complete
bigot.
xxxx
It is not traditional or is it acceptable for same sex marriage.
Man was designed to fit into a woman's vagina.
He wasn't designed to fit into another man's rectum.
It is a perversion and spreads disease.
You can't make America like Nazi Germany to prove
a dumb point.
Hmm.. a neo-con proving Godwin's Law. How completely unsurprising.
xxxx
I was set up.
Can't you get it through your thick head that marriage is
for man and woman and it's staying that way too.
Yet again, I will ask: Why?
xxxx
It is not traditional or is it acceptable for same sex marriage.
Man was designed to fit into a woman's vagina.
He wasn't designed to fit into another man's rectum.
It is a perversion and spreads disease.
The one and only thing that a mixed gender
couple can do that a same sex couple can not do is procreate "naturally."
You have asserted that procreation is NOT a requirement for legal marriage.
It is proveable that people can procreate without the benefits of legal
marriage. So if a mixed gender couple, one with a vastectomy and the other
with a hysterectomy, can be legally married, why not allow legal marriage
between two men or two women? I mean to say, what LEGALLY BASED reason can
you give?
xxxx
The LEGAL BASE IS: It's against the law because:
Marriage is the wholesome tradition of a man and a woman
joining for life to be a healthy unit that is of benefit to
the nation through tax collection, children, wholesome
living and providing example for others to emulate while
fitting into society in a way that promotes security for
national economic growth and prosperity.
This union also promotes religion and the benefits of
religion in the American tradition of wholesome living.
This is what America is made up of in the vast majority of
the population.
Gay people tend to be atheist in nature because the Bible
does condemn sodomy and AIDS has shown the population that
sodomy is wrong and gays have shown that they don't care
about AIDS as they continue to propagate the disease.
I can go on forever and it won't change your mind but it's
fun composing and typing.
You know, 8 out of 10 Americans said the exact same thing about legal
prohibitions against interracial marriage, up until the United States
Supreme Court ruled on Loving v Virginia in 1969.
xxxx
Which has absolutely nothing related to same sex marriage.
If you want to live with a black guy, more power to you.
In fact, if you want to live with people of all races you
can do so at the same time as having a girl friend too.
You can marry the girl friend and carry on but you can't
marry a guy because recognized by law marriage isn't for
same sex.
Set your legal documentation accordingly.
The29
--
Gregory Gadow
techbear@serv.net
http://www.serv.net/~techbear
"[T]hose who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves;
and, under the rule of a just God, cannot long retain it."
-- Pres. George W. Bush, Hypocrite, his inauguration speech, 2005
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jos Flachs" |
|
| Title: Re: ACLU sues for gays' benefits |
30 Mar 2005 06:04:22 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 03:10:34 -0800, SMITH29 <smith29@comcast.net>
wrote:
Then why do you neo-cons insist that the whole point of marriage is
procreation?
xxxx
1. I'm not a neo-con.
No, that is far to complimentary for ilk like you.
2. I don't insist on procreation nor does the law.
For all I care, you can procreate as much as you desire with your
Buick. Or was it a Cadillac? Probably a second hand Yugo.
It is not traditional or is it acceptable for same sex marriage.
How would you know? It wasn't traditional nor acceptable for niggers
to go to school either. Had you been born a bit earlier, that would
have been your biggest worry.
Man was designed to fit into a woman's vagina.
Really? Try a ***** once in a while.
He wasn't designed to fit into another man's rectum.
What about another woman's rectum?
It is a perversion and spreads disease.
Ah, is sex filthy?
When properly done, yes.
(Woody Allen)
xxxx
The LEGAL BASE IS: It's against the law because:
Marriage is the wholesome tradition of a man and a woman
joining for life to be a healthy unit that is of benefit to
the nation through tax collection, children, wholesome
living and providing example for others to emulate while
fitting into society in a way that promotes security for
national economic growth and prosperity.
More often than not sentences that run for 6 lines without a full stop
are copied by simpletons. Quod Erat Demonstrandum.
This union also promotes religion and the benefits of
religion in the American tradition of wholesome living.
Religion? Are you nuts? Belay that last question. You are.
This is what America is made up of in the vast majority of
the population.
Sorry, that is what YOU just made up.
Gay people tend to be atheist in nature because the Bible
does condemn sodomy and AIDS has shown the population that
sodomy is wrong and gays have shown that they don't care
about AIDS as they continue to propagate the disease.
Any idea what you just copied and pasted? Any at all?
I can go on forever and it won't change your mind but it's
fun composing and typing.
composing... me thinks more like composting.
You know, 8 out of 10 Americans said the exact same thing about legal
prohibitions against interracial marriage, up until the United States
Supreme Court ruled on Loving v Virginia in 1969.
xxxx
Which has absolutely nothing related to same sex marriage.
If you want to live with a black guy, more power to you.
Let me guess, you got a few good friends who are ...
In fact, if you want to live with people of all races you
can do so at the same time as having a girl friend too.
How generous!
You can marry the girl friend and carry on but you can't
marry a guy because recognized by law marriage isn't for
same sex.
Set your legal documentation accordingly.
I'm afraid you are a wee bit too late for that. Jeb Stuart is dead,
son.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gregory Gadow" |
|
| Title: Re: ACLU sues for gays' benefits |
30 Mar 2005 11:00:37 AM |
|
|
SMITH29 wrote:
Gregory Gadow wrote:
SMITH29 wrote:
Gregory Gadow wrote:
J Young wrote:
Why would any man need another man to provide him with health care
benefits? The advantage of gay partnerships is that there are no
children at home that need attending.
Following your "logic", health care benefits of heterosexual marriage
should exist if and only if there are children. Correct?
xxxx
A part of marriage is procreation possibility which is not
mandatory.
Then why do you neo-cons insist that the whole point of marriage is
procreation?
xxxx
1. I'm not a neo-con.
Your posts say otherwise.
2. I don't insist on procreation nor does the law.
And yet you keep saying over and over again that the whole point to those right,
responsibilities, privileges and protection that come with marriage exist solely
because of procreation, and that THAT is why same sex couples should be
prohibited from marrying.
If procreation is merely a possibility, and if couples who can
not or will not procreate can be married, why not allow same sex couples to
marry? You can't have it both ways without coming across as a complete
bigot.
xxxx
It is not traditional or is it acceptable for same sex marriage.
At one point, it was not traditional nor acceptable for a black to marry a white.
In fact, it was so untraditional and unacceptable that it took a Supreme Court
ruling in 1967 to permit it.
Man was designed to fit into a woman's vagina.
He wasn't designed to fit into another man's rectum.
Ah, so the government should be allowed to dictate what sexual activities two
consenting adults may engage in, at least with regards to marriage? What about
two women who wish to be married?
It is a perversion
According to your personal bigotries.
and spreads disease.
No more so than any other sex act. The key, for you who are uninformed, is good
personal hygiene.
You can't make America like Nazi Germany to prove
a dumb point.
Hmm.. a neo-con proving Godwin's Law. How completely unsurprising.
xxxx
I was set up.
Another neo-con refuses to take responsibility for his own actions. Again, how
completely unsurprising.
Can't you get it through your thick head that marriage is
for man and woman and it's staying that way too.
Yet again, I will ask: Why?
xxxx
It is not traditional or is it acceptable for same sex marriage.
Circular reasoning.
Man was designed to fit into a woman's vagina.
Man wasn't "designed."
He wasn't designed to fit into another man's rectum.
Man wasn't "designed" to fit into a woman's rectum; therefore marriage must be
prohibited in cases of male-female sodomy?
It is a perversion
Your personal bigotries are not a matter of law.
and spreads disease.
No more so than any other sex act, if you know how to use soap and water.
Some on, certainly you can come up with a VALID argument, just this once?
The one and only thing that a mixed gender
couple can do that a same sex couple can not do is procreate "naturally."
You have asserted that procreation is NOT a requirement for legal marriage.
It is proveable that people can procreate without the benefits of legal
marriage. So if a mixed gender couple, one with a vastectomy and the other
with a hysterectomy, can be legally married, why not allow legal marriage
between two men or two women? I mean to say, what LEGALLY BASED reason can
you give?
xxxx
The LEGAL BASE IS: It's against the law because:
Marriage is the wholesome tradition of a man and a woman
joining for life to be a healthy unit that is of benefit to
the nation through tax collection, children, wholesome
living and providing example for others to emulate while
fitting into society in a way that promotes security for
national economic growth and prosperity.
"Wholesome tradition?" How do you reconcile that with the fact that, over most of
human history, that tradition has been based on the concept of women as property?
"Joined for life?" Divorce is strictly prohibited, is it?
"Healthy unit?" Can you say, 'spousal abuse'? And how do you reconcile the sad
fact that spousal abuse exists and is common with your "healthy unit" and "joined
for life" stances?
"Benefit to the nation through tax collection?" I was not aware that marriage
benefited the nation through tax collection. Until the very recent advent of the
two-income family, marriage deductions actually *cost* the federal government in
taxes.
"Children?" They will happen, marriage or not.
"Wholesome living?" How is marriage any more "wholesome" than not being married?
In a legal sense, I mean.
An "example for others to emulate"? If marriage is such a worthy thing, why do
you scream and rant when others DO want to emulate it?
"Fitting in to society?" So you hold to the position that unmarried people are
inherently outside of societal norms?
"Promotes security for national economic growth and prosperity?" How is marriage
superior to, say, holding a job or supporting local businesses, neither of which
require one to be married?
For someone who claims not to be a neo-con, you are certainly capable of cutting
and pasting the neo-con talking points. And, just like a neo-con, you are
entirely incapable of looking at those talking points with any capacity for
rational thought.
- remainder of neo-con religious based bigotry snipped -
Come back when you are actually willing to THINK about the matter as an issue of
law.
--
Gregory Gadow
techbear@serv.net
http://www.serv.net/~techbear
"[T]hose who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves;
and, under the rule of a just God, cannot long retain it."
-- Pres. George W. Bush, Hypocrite, his inauguration speech, 2005
.
|
|
|
| User: "SMITH29" |
|
| Title: Re: ACLU sues for gays' benefits |
30 Mar 2005 10:07:06 PM |
|
|
Gregory Gadow wrote:
Come back when you are actually willing to THINK about the matter as an issue of
law.
xxxx
I did that long ago and my conclusion is I am opposed to gay
marriage and to say otherwise would be fudging on my part
and I'm not about to do that.
The29
--
Gregory Gadow
techbear@serv.net
http://www.serv.net/~techbear
"[T]hose who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves;
and, under the rule of a just God, cannot long retain it."
-- Pres. George W. Bush, Hypocrite, his inauguration speech, 2005
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: ACLU sues for gays' benefits |
31 Mar 2005 10:17:01 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 20:07:06 -0800, SMITH29 <smith29@comcast.net>
drained his beer, leaned back in the alt.atheism beanbag and drunkenly
proclaimed the following
I did that long ago and my conclusion is I am opposed to gay
marriage and to say otherwise would be fudging on my part
and I'm not about to do that.
I oppose the Designated Hitter rule. Doesn't mean I get to disband
the American League.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
|
|
|
| User: "SMITH29" |
|
| Title: Re: ACLU sues for gays' benefits |
31 Mar 2005 05:18:23 PM |
|
|
Douglas Berry wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 20:07:06 -0800, SMITH29 <smith29@comcast.net>
drained his beer, leaned back in the alt.atheism beanbag and drunkenly
proclaimed the following
I did that long ago and my conclusion is I am opposed to gay
marriage and to say otherwise would be fudging on my part
and I'm not about to do that.
I oppose the Designated Hitter rule. Doesn't mean I get to disband
the American League.
xxxx
What has the American League have to do with this thread?
29?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dionisio" |
|
| Title: Re: ACLU sues for gays' benefits |
31 Mar 2005 10:46:09 PM |
|
|
SMITH29 wrote:
What has the American League have to do with this thread?
Jockstraps, spandex pants, "pitchers" and "catchers," a knowledge of
"big wood," and a preoccupation with balls and "nailing" things...
Getting to first base, making it to second... Gee, I don't know.
--
Quoted in the New Scientist [1995]:
A Doctor at Yale has observed that all the fingers have names, but that only the big toe has a name. He thus proposes names for all 5 toes: porcellus fori, porcellus domi, porcellus carnivorus, porcellus non voratus, porcellus plorans domum.
.
|
|
|
| User: "SMITH29" |
|
| Title: Re: ACLU sues for gays' benefits |
31 Mar 2005 11:04:12 PM |
|
|
Dionisio wrote:
SMITH29 wrote:
What has the American League have to do with this thread?
Jockstraps, spandex pants, "pitchers" and "catchers," a knowledge of
"big wood," and a preoccupation with balls and "nailing" things...
Getting to first base, making it to second... Gee, I don't know.
xxxx
Yer not implying that ball players are homo are you?
29
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: ACLU sues for gays' benefits |
01 Apr 2005 11:22:53 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:04:12 -0800, SMITH29 <smith29@comcast.net>
drained his beer, leaned back in the alt.atheism beanbag and drunkenly
proclaimed the following
Dionisio wrote:
SMITH29 wrote:
What has the American League have to do with this thread?
Jockstraps, spandex pants, "pitchers" and "catchers," a knowledge of
"big wood," and a preoccupation with balls and "nailing" things...
Getting to first base, making it to second... Gee, I don't know.
xxxx
Yer not implying that ball players are homo are you?
Ever hear of Billy Bean?
http://www.billybean.com/
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sir Marksman" |
|
| Title: Re: ACLU sues for gays' benefits |
01 Apr 2005 11:30:28 AM |
|
|
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
news:kp0r41landc49jvr1k4hg35f4jo12ueaid@4ax.com...
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:04:12 -0800, SMITH29 <smith29@comcast.net>
drained his beer, leaned back in the alt.atheism beanbag and drunkenly
proclaimed the following
Dionisio wrote:
SMITH29 wrote:
What has the American League have to do with this thread?
Jockstraps, spandex pants, "pitchers" and "catchers," a knowledge of
"big wood," and a preoccupation with balls and "nailing" things...
Getting to first base, making it to second... Gee, I don't know.
xxxx
Yer not implying that ball players are homo are you?
Ever hear of Billy Bean?
Oh look, another ***** whining about having no life.
If you were normal, you'd have a life.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mickey" |
|
| Title: Re: ACLU sues for gays' benefits |
20 Apr 2005 02:53:43 PM |
|
|
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
news:kp0r41landc49jvr1k4hg35f4jo12ueaid@4ax.com...
Oh look, another ***** whining about having no life.
Ah yes, a classic case. Someone with THIS much hostility towards
homosexuals is obviously fighting off his own desires in that arena.
If you were normal, you'd have a life.
If you had a life, you'd be normal. You don't, and therefor you aren't,
not that this really needed to be pointed out. You may now proceed to
cast whatever insults at me and make those references to my sexual
orientation, but fair warning, I am the father of 9.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sir Marksman" |
|
| Title: Re: ACLU sues for special benefits for gays |
20 Apr 2005 02:55:38 PM |
|
|
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114026823.788175.121100@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
news:kp0r41landc49jvr1k4hg35f4jo12ueaid@4ax.com...
Oh look, another ***** whining about having no life.
Ah yes, a classic case. Someone with THIS much hostility towards
homosexuals is obviously fighting off his own desires in that arena.
Someone with this delusional thought pattern must be gay.
Do you enjoy deluding yourself? Or is that the only way you can manage to
get thru life?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mickey" |
|
| Title: Re: ACLU sues for special benefits for gays |
20 Apr 2005 03:07:17 PM |
|
|
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114026823.788175.121100@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
message
news:kp0r41landc49jvr1k4hg35f4jo12ueaid@4ax.com...
Oh look, another ***** whining about having no life.
Ah yes, a classic case. Someone with THIS much hostility towards
homosexuals is obviously fighting off his own desires in that
arena.
Someone with this delusional thought pattern must be gay.
Gay? Me? Sure, if you mean happy. The 9 kids sort of put any other
meaning you might have intend to the laugh test.
Do you enjoy deluding yourself? Or is that the only way you can
manage to
get thru life?
I get through life by taking people as they come. In your case, you
came as an idiot, I will take you as such until you prove otherwise, a
task which is no doubt well past both your abilities or your nature.
But please do carry on, I find your ilk most amusing.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sir Marksman" |
|
| Title: Re: ACLU sues for special benefits for gays |
20 Apr 2005 03:20:53 PM |
|
|
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114027637.225079.295020@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114026823.788175.121100@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
message
news:kp0r41landc49jvr1k4hg35f4jo12ueaid@4ax.com...
Oh look, another ***** whining about having no life.
Ah yes, a classic case. Someone with THIS much hostility towards
homosexuals is obviously fighting off his own desires in that
arena.
Someone with this delusional thought pattern must be gay.
Gay? Me? Sure, if you mean happy. The 9 kids sort of put any other
meaning you might have intend to the laugh test.
I doubt you have any kids. You are very hostile towards straight people.
Do you enjoy deluding yourself? Or is that the only way you can
manage to
get thru life?
I get through life by taking people as they come. In your case, you
came as an idiot, I will take you as such until you prove otherwise, a
task which is no doubt well past both your abilities or your nature.
But please do carry on, I find your ilk most amusing.
You LIEberals are hilarious, you take your own personality disorders and
project them onto others.
You are not worth my while kid.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mickey" |
|
| Title: Re: ACLU sues for special benefits for gays |
20 Apr 2005 03:25:20 PM |
|
|
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114027637.225079.295020@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114026823.788175.121100@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
message
news:kp0r41landc49jvr1k4hg35f4jo12ueaid@4ax.com...
Oh look, another ***** whining about having no life.
Ah yes, a classic case. Someone with THIS much hostility towards
homosexuals is obviously fighting off his own desires in that
arena.
Someone with this delusional thought pattern must be gay.
Gay? Me? Sure, if you mean happy. The 9 kids sort of put any other
meaning you might have intend to the laugh test.
I doubt you have any kids. You are very hostile towards straight
people.
Your "doubts" in no way affect reality. And in any case, I have zero
hostility towards straight people, just towards idiots. The fact that
you're basking under that umbrella is your own doing. Sadly, as with
all idiots, you're even too dense to understand that little bit.
Do you enjoy deluding yourself? Or is that the only way you can
manage to
get thru life?
I get through life by taking people as they come. In your case, you
came as an idiot, I will take you as such until you prove
otherwise, a
task which is no doubt well past both your abilities or your
nature.
But please do carry on, I find your ilk most amusing.
You LIEberals are hilarious, you take your own personality disorders
and
project them onto others.
Liberals? Ah, still out to prove your lack of positive genetic markers,
eh? I am a conservative and a Republican. Need any help extracting taht
foot from your mouth?
You are not worth my while kid.
Your while isn't worth anything, so no loss there, eh moron?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sir Marksman" |
|
| Title: Re: ACLU sues for special benefits for gays |
20 Apr 2005 03:40:31 PM |
|
|
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114028720.384350.29990@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114027637.225079.295020@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114026823.788175.121100@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
message
news:kp0r41landc49jvr1k4hg35f4jo12ueaid@4ax.com...
Oh look, another ***** whining about having no life.
Ah yes, a classic case. Someone with THIS much hostility towards
homosexuals is obviously fighting off his own desires in that
arena.
Someone with this delusional thought pattern must be gay.
Gay? Me? Sure, if you mean happy. The 9 kids sort of put any other
meaning you might have intend to the laugh test.
I doubt you have any kids. You are very hostile towards straight
people.
Your "doubts" in no way affect reality.
Your hostility is self evident.
You aren't interested in debate. You want a flame war.
You are dismissed.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mickey" |
|
| Title: Re: ACLU sues for special benefits for gays |
21 Apr 2005 07:52:23 AM |
|
|
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114028720.384350.29990@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114027637.225079.295020@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114026823.788175.121100@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
message
news:kp0r41landc49jvr1k4hg35f4jo12ueaid@4ax.com...
Oh look, another ***** whining about having no life.
Ah yes, a classic case. Someone with THIS much hostility
towards
homosexuals is obviously fighting off his own desires in that
arena.
Someone with this delusional thought pattern must be gay.
Gay? Me? Sure, if you mean happy. The 9 kids sort of put any
other
meaning you might have intend to the laugh test.
I doubt you have any kids. You are very hostile towards straight
people.
Your "doubts" in no way affect reality.
Your hostility is self evident.
ROFL!!! Hostily being defined by the fact that I refuse to hang anyone
who happens to be gay!!! What a moron.
You aren't interested in debate. You want a flame war.
Debate? That would require a modicum of intelligence on your part,
which is yet to be presented. As of now, all you have displayed is
ignorance and arrogance. Par for the course for those of your ilk.
You are dismissed.
As if you could ROFL!!!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sir Marksman" |
|
| Title: Re: ACLU sues for special benefits for gays |
21 Apr 2005 07:55:15 AM |
|
|
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114087943.197949.299500@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114028720.384350.29990@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114027637.225079.295020@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114026823.788175.121100@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
message
news:kp0r41landc49jvr1k4hg35f4jo12ueaid@4ax.com...
Oh look, another ***** whining about having no life.
Ah yes, a classic case. Someone with THIS much hostility
towards
homosexuals is obviously fighting off his own desires in that
arena.
Someone with this delusional thought pattern must be gay.
Gay? Me? Sure, if you mean happy. The 9 kids sort of put any
other
meaning you might have intend to the laugh test.
I doubt you have any kids. You are very hostile towards straight
people.
Your "doubts" in no way affect reality.
Your hostility is self evident.
ROFL!!! Hostily being defined by the fact that I refuse to hang anyone
who happens to be gay!!! What a moron.
Your denial of your HATEMONGERING is noted.
You aren't interested in debate. You want a flame war.
Debate? That would require a modicum of intelligence on your part,
which is yet to be presented. As of now, all you have displayed is
ignorance and arrogance. Par for the course for those of your ilk.
Oh look, you can't refute anything, so you resort to insults.
Thanks for proving me correct yet again.
You are dismissed.
As if you could ROFL!!!!!
As if you have a choice!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mickey" |
|
| Title: Re: ACLU sues for special benefits for gays |
21 Apr 2005 09:44:35 AM |
|
|
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114087943.197949.299500@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Your hostility is self evident.
ROFL!!! Hostily being defined by the fact that I refuse to hang
anyone
who happens to be gay!!! What a moron.
Your denial of your HATEMONGERING is noted.
OK dimwit, post a link to where I stated I hated straight people. Come
on, I DARE YOU!!!!
You aren't interested in debate. You want a flame war.
Debate? That would require a modicum of intelligence on your part,
which is yet to be presented. As of now, all you have displayed is
ignorance and arrogance. Par for the course for those of your ilk.
Oh look, you can't refute anything, so you resort to insults.
PKB yet again. It is YOU who are a hate mongerer, it is YOU who has
ducked debate in favor of insults, and now you think you can convince
those reading it was me? ROFL!!! Are you REALLY that stupid, or do you
just think everyone else is?
Thanks for proving me correct yet again.
You are dismissed.
As if you could ROFL!!!!!
As if you have a choice!
Thanks for the proof.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sir Marksman" |
|
| Title: Re: ACLU sues for special benefits for gays |
21 Apr 2005 09:54:09 AM |
|
|
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
Your denial of your HATEMONGERING is noted.
OK dimwit,
More insults... Thanks again for proving me correct yet again.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mickey" |
|
| Title: Re: ACLU sues for special benefits for gays |
21 Apr 2005 11:48:57 AM |
|
|
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
Your denial of your HATEMONGERING is noted.
OK dimwit,
More insults... Thanks again for proving me correct yet again.
ROFL!!!!!! You're even funnier than Alex, and that is say ing a great
deal. Thanks for providing me with some much needed entertainment. As
we both know, no one here with an iota of gray matter actually buys
this game of yours.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sir Marksman" |
|
| Title: Re: ACLU sues for special benefits for gays |
21 Apr 2005 11:52:27 AM |
|
|
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114102137.286118.86970@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
Your denial of your HATEMONGERING is noted.
OK dimwit,
More insults... Thanks again for proving me correct yet again.
ROFL!!!!!! You're even funnier than Alex, and that is say ing a great
deal. Thanks for providing me with some much needed entertainment. As
we both know, no one here with an iota of gray matter actually buys
this game of yours.
Everyone here with sanity and intelligence sees you for the hatemonger you
are.
But you are amusing at times.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mickey" |
|
| Title: Re: ACLU sues for special benefits for gays |
21 Apr 2005 02:51:14 PM |
|
|
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114102137.286118.86970@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
Your denial of your HATEMONGERING is noted.
OK dimwit,
More insults... Thanks again for proving me correct yet again.
ROFL!!!!!! You're even funnier than Alex, and that is say ing a
great
deal. Thanks for providing me with some much needed entertainment.
As
we both know, no one here with an iota of gray matter actually buys
this game of yours.
Everyone here with sanity and intelligence sees you for the
hatemonger you
are.
Again, I DARE you to post a link to apost by me saying I hate straight
people. Put up, or preferably, shut up.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sir Marksman" |
|
| Title: Re: ACLU sues for special benefits for gays |
21 Apr 2005 02:53:26 PM |
|
|
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114113074.331809.255120@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114102137.286118.86970@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
Your denial of your HATEMONGERING is noted.
OK dimwit,
More insults... Thanks again for proving me correct yet again.
ROFL!!!!!! You're even funnier than Alex, and that is say ing a
great
deal. Thanks for providing me with some much needed entertainment.
As
we both know, no one here with an iota of gray matter actually buys
this game of yours.
Everyone here with sanity and intelligence sees you for the
hatemonger you
are.
Again, I DARE you to post a link to apost by me saying I hate straight
people.
Read your own posts kid. You get what you are worth, nothing.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mickey" |
|
| Title: Re: ACLU sues for special benefits for gays |
22 Apr 2005 08:56:53 AM |
|
|
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114113074.331809.255120@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114102137.286118.86970@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
Your denial of your HATEMONGERING is noted.
OK dimwit,
More insults... Thanks again for proving me correct yet again.
ROFL!!!!!! You're even funnier than Alex, and that is say ing a
great
deal. Thanks for providing me with some much needed
entertainment.
As
we both know, no one here with an iota of gray matter actually
buys
this game of yours.
Everyone here with sanity and intelligence sees you for the
hatemonger you
are.
Again, I DARE you to post a link to apost by me saying I hate
straight
people.
Read your own posts kid. You get what you are worth, nothing.
In other words, you CANNOT proive the proof requested. Typical of the
average UseNet blowhard. Expected and noted.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sir Marksman" |
|
| Title: Re: ACLU sues for special benefits for gays |
22 Apr 2005 08:59:12 AM |
|
|
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114178213.918726.60770@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114113074.331809.255120@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114102137.286118.86970@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
Your denial of your HATEMONGERING is noted.
OK dimwit,
More insults... Thanks again for proving me correct yet again.
ROFL!!!!!! You're even funnier than Alex, and that is say ing a
great
deal. Thanks for providing me with some much needed
entertainment.
As
we both know, no one here with an iota of gray matter actually
buys
this game of yours.
Everyone here with sanity and intelligence sees you for the
hatemonger you
are.
Again, I DARE you to post a link to apost by me saying I hate
straight
people.
Read your own posts kid. You get what you are worth, nothing.
In other words, you CANNOT proive the proof requested. Typical of the
average UseNet blowhard.
Another LIEberal with nothing but childish insults and denial of facts, no
surprise there.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mickey" |
|
| Title: Re: ACLU sues for special benefits for gays |
22 Apr 2005 12:44:32 PM |
|
|
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114178213.918726.60770@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
<Snip>
Everyone here with sanity and intelligence sees you for the
hatemonger you
are.
Again, I DARE you to post a link to apost by me saying I hate
straight
people.
Read your own posts kid. You get what you are worth, nothing.
In other words, you CANNOT proive the proof requested. Typical of
the
average UseNet blowhard.
Another LIEberal with nothing but childish insults and denial of
facts, no
surprise there.
Odd that you constantly insult people, and then claim that they did it
to you. Then again, you have made it QUITE clear that you are incapable
of actually debating a subject, or providing proof of your claims. I
have now asked you 3 times to post the proof of your LIE, and yet you
have ducked it every time. You are nothing more than a coward.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sir Marksman" |
|
| Title: Re: ACLU sues for special benefits for gays |
22 Apr 2005 01:02:09 PM |
|
|
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114191872.279063.302200@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114178213.918726.60770@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
<Snip>
Everyone here with sanity and intelligence sees you for the
hatemonger you
are.
Again, I DARE you to post a link to apost by me saying I hate
straight
people.
Read your own posts kid. You get what you are worth, nothing.
In other words, you CANNOT proive the proof requested. Typical of
the
average UseNet blowhard.
Another LIEberal with nothing but childish insults and denial of
facts, no
surprise there.
Odd that you constantly insult people, and then claim that they did it
to you.
I reply in kind.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mickey" |
|
| Title: Re: ACLU sues for special benefits for gays |
25 Apr 2005 09:57:05 AM |
|
|
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114191872.279063.302200@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114178213.918726.60770@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
<Snip>
Everyone here with sanity and intelligence sees you for the
hatemonger you
are.
Again, I DARE you to post a link to apost by me saying I hate
straight
people.
Read your own posts kid. You get what you are worth, nothing.
In other words, you CANNOT proive the proof requested. Typical
of
the
average UseNet blowhard.
Another LIEberal with nothing but childish insults and denial of
facts, no
surprise there.
Odd that you constantly insult people, and then claim that they did
it
to you.
I reply in kind.
And duck in spades.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sir Marksman" |
|
| Title: Re: ACLU sues for special benefits for gays |
25 Apr 2005 10:07:07 AM |
|
|
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114441025.813497.309110@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114191872.279063.302200@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Mickey" <mickeyb@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1114178213.918726.60770@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Sir Marksman wrote:
<Snip>
Everyone here with sanity and intelligence sees you for the
hatemonger you
are.
Again, I DARE you to post a link to apost by me saying I hate
straight
people.
Read your own posts kid. You get what you are worth, nothing.
In other words, you CANNOT proive the proof requested. Typical
of
the
average UseNet blowhard.
Another LIEberal with nothing but childish insults and denial of
facts, no
surprise there.
Odd that you constantly insult people, and then claim that they did
it
to you.
I reply in kind.
And duck in spades.
You are delusional, I am right here. Is it possible you can be honest?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
