| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Elroy Willis" |
| Date: |
03 Jan 2004 11:23:04 AM |
| Object: |
Age of Aquarius |
Note: This is crossposted to alt.astrology and alt.bible. I'm not
attempting to start a flame war, but rather to start up a rational
discussion on the "Age of Aquarius" and how it relates to the Bible
and astrology.
I just finished reading "The DaVinci Code" and am doing some research
on one of the ideas brought up in the book, namely that of some new
"Age of Aquarius," and what will mark its exact beginning.
Anyone who has done a fair amount of reading about Jesus will have
certainly run across claims that he was supposed to be some marker for
the beginning of the age of Pisces, what with the fish symbolisms and
all that were used by the first Christians and the Jesus fishes on
cars today.
So, I started web-surfing, reading different sites from modern
astrologers, trying to get an idea of what they think might mark some
actual "beginning" of the "Age of Aquarius," and the results were
interesting in many ways.
Much of it seems to include "end of the world" type ideas, with wars
and earthquakes and stuff that you read about in the Bible, from what
I've seen so far. Those are present in all times throughout history,
so seeing them around you is no indication of anything "new" at least
in my opinion. History repeats itself, so it's said...
From:
http://raphaelonline.com/Aquarius.htm
"In no way is this new age the end of the world or a final time of any
sort, except in regard to the end of this present day Earth
civilization."
I wonder what this guy means by "end of this present day Earth
civilization." Probably some WWIII, or armageddon or doomsday
situation?
Reading on...
"Much mischief and evil is connected with this change, especially in
respect to religions, and the use of new scientific discoveries and
advancements. These will increase and continue until the end of this
present day civilization, which will come by way of World War III."
Yep, WWIII. Another doomsayer. I wonder if doomsaying is parcel
and part of all astrologers beliefs? I don't know for sure...
From:
http://www.paranormality.com/age_of_aquarius.shtml
"Age of Aquarius : The Age of Aquarius can mean the end of an era,
(age of Pisces) and the beginning of another. Many feel the Age of
Aquarius heralds the coming of the "end of times" as written in the
Bible, others feel it is the dawning of the "new world order".
Whatever it means it is still mysterious, and opinions differ widely
in the Astrology community."
This is starting out a little better... It's recognized that opinions
differ widely among astrologers as to when some "exact beginning"
of the "Age of Aquarius" began, or will begin.
"Thus, the spring equinox has been occurring in Pisces for the past
several thousand years and will begin to occur in the constellation
Aquarius in the near future. This is the background for current
speculations about the so-called Age of Aquarius. The phenomenon of
the precession of equinoxes also means that the spring equinox
occurred in the sign Aries during the Hellenistic period (the period
of Ptolemy), in Taurus several thousand years prior to the Hellenistic
period, and so forth backward through the zodiac."
[...]
Although I don't personally believe in astrology, or at least the
astrological idea that the position of constellations or planets can
affect people's personalities and futures, I do accept the above as an
objective fact which can be proven true through research. The
"wobble" of the earth causes the constellation seen on the
spring equinox (or any other time actually) to slowly change over
time.
"Thus, attention is called to the negative Piscean tendency to adopt
an attitude of blind faith, and to the positive Aquarian tendency to
adopt a more empirical attitude."
I'm all for people giving up blind faith, and even astrology, and
moving on to some new age of reason where people think more
empirically and logically, tossing out superstition and those who sell
it along the way.
It wouldn't bother me a bit to see the RCC and other religious
organizations go down the tubes, as well as the astrologers who
make money off of other people by "selling" them some charts or
horoscopes. Same for the fake faith healers, and the phoney psychics
out there. Wouldn't bother me to see them all go away, just like Miss
Cleo seems to have gone away, at least around here.
On to another page...
From:
http://www.lightforthelastdays.co.uk/docs/cults_occult/aquarius.html
"The Daily Mail (29/12/97 - 2/1/98) featured a series of articles by
astrologer Jonathan Cainer, who claims that 'the Age of Aquarius is
truly dawning.' The articles paint a rosy view of the future in
contrast with 'gloomy visions' that the 20th century would end 'in
chaos and collapse'. Cainer believes the 20th Century has 'run out of
steam' and we are now about to create 'a world based on enlightenment,
prosperity, freedom and tolerance.'"
Kinda weird that "running out of steam" would lead to enlightenment,
but then I thought about getting old, and getting wiser in old age,
and moving slower...
"The "face of the man" is the ancient sign of Aquarius, the sign of
the man carrying the water-pot, to which Christ referred when He sent
His disciples into the city, saying: "Behold, when ye are entered into
the city, there shall a man meet you bearing a pitcher of water;
follow him into the house where he entereth in." (St. Luke, XXII, 10.)
This is the zodiacal sign into which we are entering."
I find a problem with this idea, since if Jesus was supposed to be
ushering in the age of Pisces, why would he speak of some water
pitcher and the age of Aquarius?
It then dawned on me that if Jesus was actually an astrologer, and
was trying to martyr himself as the marker for the new age of Pisces,
then he might likely speak in some code to his disciples about
"bearing the cross" or "bearing the crossing over" into some new
astrological age. The part about the water pitcher could have been
a message to any future Christian astrologers who wanted to martyr
themselves as part of some "new age" marker.
[...]
'If the Age of Aquarius is upon us, what have we been living through
until now? The answer is the Age of Pisces. For just as the turning of
the earth has its yearly seasons, it traces, as it travels through the
sky, a much broader cyclic pattern... The Egyptians knew all about
this. So did the Greeks. They called it a 'great year' and they
subdivided it into 12 'great months', each named after a different
Zodiac sign. Each 'great month' lasts roughly 2,160 years. The last,
Pisces, had just begun when Christ was born in Bethlehem. It's
interesting to speculate that it may be no coincidence that the early
Christians used a fish as a symbol of their faith.'"
What I'm interested in is what kind of symbol the people who believe
the "Age of Aquarius" is upon us will use, or are using right now.
Any examples that anyone wants to present?
For Pisces, it was a fish, and for Aquarius, it's supposed to be a
water pitcher or water bearer? Since fish live in water, is there a
connection there?
--
Elroy Willis
EAP Chief Editor and Newshound
http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news
.
|
|
| User: "JessHC" |
|
| Title: Re: Georgann posts another lie |
12 Feb 2004 12:03:14 AM |
|
|
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:<BC4F85D0.35363C37%chenault@mindspring.com>...
Now do you want to answer my question or will you continue just
being an obtuse lying *****?
Has she ever been any other way?
"ellis@no.spam" wrote:
I lack data on that.
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
From where I sit, you lack sufficient integrity on that.
You mean from your sinful position of adultery?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jim Phillips" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
11 Feb 2004 08:22:17 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, georgann wrote:
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> lied:
I did answer the original question. It is in the Bible.
"ellis@no.spam" wrote:
I asked you what part of the Bible. Your answer was evasive.
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
My answer was not evasive. The whole of the Bible has no other purpose other
than to speak of God's will and His relationship to man. If you don't know
that its not my problem.
So when god said "Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who
has slept with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept
with a man" (Numbers 31:17-18) you have absolutely no problem with killing
all of those people simply because the bible claims god said it was okay?
--
Jim Phillips, jphillip at bcpl dot net
"If you have chicken at lunch and chicken at dinner, do you ever
wonder if the two chickens knew each other?" -- George Carlin
.
|
|
|
| User: "georgann" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
11 Feb 2004 04:54:19 PM |
|
|
"ellis@no.spam" wrote:
I asked you what part of the Bible. Your answer was evasive.
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
My answer was not evasive. The whole of the Bible has no other purpose other
than to speak of God's will and His relationship to man. If you don't know
that its not my problem.
"Jim Phillips" wrote:
So when god said "Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept
with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man"
(Numbers 31:17-18) you have absolutely no problem with killing all of those
people simply because the bible claims god said it was okay?
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
I have no problem with God telling the Jews to wipe out the Canaanites
however He told them to do it.
Do you have any idea what the problem was with the Canaanites in God's eyes?
--
(`'·.¸(`'·.¸(`'·.¸ ¸.·'´)¸.·'´)¸.·'´)
«´¨`·.¸¸ ¸¸.·´¨ `»
All your prophecy are belong to Christ!
(¸.·'´(¸.·'´(¸.·'´ `'·.¸)`'·.¸)`'·.¸)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
11 Feb 2004 05:25:07 PM |
|
|
And so upon Wed, 11 Feb 2004 22:54:19 +0000 didst georgann speak thusly:
"ellis@no.spam" wrote:
I asked you what part of the Bible. Your answer was evasive.
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
My answer was not evasive. The whole of the Bible has no other purpose other
than to speak of God's will and His relationship to man. If you don't know
that its not my problem.
"Jim Phillips" wrote:
So when god said "Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept
with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man"
(Numbers 31:17-18) you have absolutely no problem with killing all of those
people simply because the bible claims god said it was okay?
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
I have no problem with God telling the Jews to wipe out the Canaanites
however He told them to do it.
So you're comfortable with genocide and mass murder?
Do you have any idea what the problem was with the Canaanites in God's eyes?
Do you know that's ***** written after the fact to justify a slaughter?
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"There is no system but GNU, and Linux is one of its kernels."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Elroy Willis" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
12 Feb 2004 12:42:36 PM |
|
|
Mark K. Bilbo <y@hoo.com-amikchi> wrote in alt.atheism
"Jim Phillips" wrote:
So when god said "Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept
with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man"
(Numbers 31:17-18) you have absolutely no problem with killing all of those
people simply because the bible claims god said it was okay?
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
I have no problem with God telling the Jews to wipe out the Canaanites
however He told them to do it.
So you're comfortable with genocide and mass murder?
The injuns' deserved everything they got, for putting up a fight!
--
Elroy Willis
EAP Chief Editor and Newshound
http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
11 Feb 2004 05:50:57 PM |
|
|
In article <BC501CCA.35363EF1%chenault@mindspring.com>,
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote:
I have no problem with God telling the Jews to wipe out the Canaanites
however He told them to do it.
That figures. Killing, rape, and torture is what you god is known
for. I'm quite happy that your god doesn't really exist. Too bad
belief in it is still used as an excuse for hatred.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Starshine Moonbeam" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
12 Feb 2004 01:07:44 AM |
|
|
In article <BC501CCA.35363EF1%chenault@mindspring.com>,
"georgann"(chenault@mindspring.com) dropped a +5 bundle of words...
"ellis@no.spam" wrote:
I asked you what part of the Bible. Your answer was evasive.
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
My answer was not evasive. The whole of the Bible has no other purpose other
than to speak of God's will and His relationship to man. If you don't know
that its not my problem.
"Jim Phillips" wrote:
So when god said "Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept
with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man"
(Numbers 31:17-18) you have absolutely no problem with killing all of those
people simply because the bible claims god said it was okay?
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
I have no problem with God telling the Jews to wipe out the Canaanites
however He told them to do it.
Do you have any idea what the problem was with the Canaanites in God's eyes?
Not enough vending machines and no playstation.
--
mhm 31x9
Smeeter #28, 29, or 30
WSD #30
Skep-ti-cult ID# 365-12149-907
Alcatroll Labs Inc. (Division of Incendiary Devices)
StArSHiNe_MoOnbEAm aT HoTMaIL DoT cOM
http://www.geocities.com/tobydog9
"Technology is getting better and that's fine but most of the time,
all you need is a stick of gum, a pocketknife, and a smile."
-- Robert Redford "Spy Game"
"You can run but you'll just die tired and buttered."
-- Ryannosaurus
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Peter J Ross" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
11 Feb 2004 06:47:00 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 22:54:19 GMT, georgann wrote:
Do you have any idea what the problem was with the Canaanites in
God's eyes?
Yes, they were unrepentant sinners, just like you.
--
PJR :-)
(Remove NOSPAM to reply)
.
|
|
|
| User: "georgann" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
12 Feb 2004 05:33:15 AM |
|
|
Do you have any idea what the problem was with the Canaanites in God's eyes?
"Peter J Ross" wrote:
Yes, they were unrepentant sinners, just like you.
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
Nope. Guess again.
--
(`'·.¸(`'·.¸(`'·.¸ ¸.·'´)¸.·'´)¸.·'´)
«´¨`·.¸¸ ¸¸.·´¨ `»
All your prophecy are belong to Christ!
(¸.·'´(¸.·'´(¸.·'´ `'·.¸)`'·.¸)`'·.¸)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jim Phillips" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
12 Feb 2004 08:37:05 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, georgann wrote:
"ellis@no.spam" wrote:
I asked you what part of the Bible. Your answer was evasive.
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
My answer was not evasive. The whole of the Bible has no other purpose other
than to speak of God's will and His relationship to man. If you don't know
that its not my problem.
"Jim Phillips" wrote:
So when god said "Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept
with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man"
(Numbers 31:17-18) you have absolutely no problem with killing all of those
people simply because the bible claims god said it was okay?
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
I have no problem with God telling the Jews to wipe out the Canaanites
however He told them to do it.
*All* of them except for the virgin girls? Why do you suppose god
said it was okay to spare the virgin girls, and what did he mean when he
said "save for yourselves"? You honestly don't have a problem with this?
Do you really believe this to be the action of a kind and loving god?
Do you have any idea what the problem was with the Canaanites in God's eyes?
I can't imagine anything that would require *every* human being
except for virgin girls to be killed. What do you think was wrong?
--
Jim Phillips, jphillip at bcpl dot net
"If you have chicken at lunch and chicken at dinner, do you ever
wonder if the two chickens knew each other?" -- George Carlin
.
|
|
|
| User: "georgann" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
12 Feb 2004 04:54:01 PM |
|
|
"Jim Phillips" wrote:
So when god said "Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept
with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a
man" (Numbers 31:17-18) you have absolutely no problem with killing all of
those people simply because the bible claims god said it was okay?
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
I have no problem with God telling the Jews to wipe out the Canaanites
however He told them to do it.
"Jim Phillips" wrote:
*All* of them except for the virgin girls? Why do you suppose god said it was
okay to spare the virgin girls, and what did he mean when he said "save for
yourselves"? You honestly don't have a problem with this? Do you really
believe this to be the action of a kind and loving god?
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
Yes. Because I know what was on the line.
Do you have any idea what the problem was with the Canaanites in God's eyes?
"Jim Phillips" wrote:
I can't imagine anything that would require *every* human being except for
virgin girls to be killed. What do you think was wrong?
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
It wasn't "every human being except for the virgin girls" ... it was
everyone of the Canaanites except for the virgin girls. You see there was
this problem of the blood lines descending from the Nephilim and its
potential threat to the line of Christ. But you wouldn't know or care about
that would you?
--
(`'·.¸(`'·.¸(`'·.¸ ¸.·'´)¸.·'´)¸.·'´)
«´¨`·.¸¸ ¸¸.·´¨ `»
All your prophecy are belong to Christ!
(¸.·'´(¸.·'´(¸.·'´ `'·.¸)`'·.¸)`'·.¸)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
12 Feb 2004 08:28:37 PM |
|
|
And so upon Thu, 12 Feb 2004 22:54:01 +0000 didst georgann speak thusly:
"Jim Phillips" wrote:
So when god said "Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept
with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a
man" (Numbers 31:17-18) you have absolutely no problem with killing all of
those people simply because the bible claims god said it was okay?
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
I have no problem with God telling the Jews to wipe out the Canaanites
however He told them to do it.
"Jim Phillips" wrote:
*All* of them except for the virgin girls? Why do you suppose god said it was
okay to spare the virgin girls, and what did he mean when he said "save for
yourselves"? You honestly don't have a problem with this? Do you really
believe this to be the action of a kind and loving god?
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
Yes. Because I know what was on the line.
Do you have any idea what the problem was with the Canaanites in God's eyes?
"Jim Phillips" wrote:
I can't imagine anything that would require *every* human being except for
virgin girls to be killed. What do you think was wrong?
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
It wasn't "every human being except for the virgin girls" ... it was
everyone of the Canaanites except for the virgin girls. You see there was
this problem of the blood lines descending from the Nephilim and its
potential threat to the line of Christ. But you wouldn't know or care about
that would you?
There goes the evil ***** justifying genocide...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"There is no system but GNU, and Linux is one of its kernels."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
13 Feb 2004 10:10:52 AM |
|
|
In article <BC516E37.35364393%chenault@mindspring.com>, georgann says...
snip
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
It wasn't "every human being except for the virgin girls" ... it was
everyone of the Canaanites except for the virgin girls. You see there was
this problem of the blood lines descending from the Nephilim and its
potential threat to the line of Christ. But you wouldn't know or care about
that would you?
<snicker> <giggle> <chortle>
And in answer to your question, no, I don't give a ***** about your mythology.
(¸.·'´(¸.·'´(¸.·'´ `'·.¸)`'·.¸)`'·.¸)
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Elroy Willis" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
12 Feb 2004 12:41:16 PM |
|
|
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote in alt.atheism
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
I have no problem with God telling the Jews to wipe out the Canaanites
however He told them to do it.
Wow, an admission that genocide is sometimes a good thing, in
the eyes of georgann's god. She'd make a good oven-lighter for
the furnaces in hell, or maybe as a follower of a hitler-like savior
or king.
Do you have any idea what the problem was with the Canaanites
in God's eyes?
Yeah, they didn't worship the same god that their foes worshipped,
or the god that the priests were trying to force on people.
Woe to them, and woe to the american natives who fell into
the same basket of barbarism as did the Canaanites. Brutalized
and killed, shipped off to concentration camps and reservations, all
because they didn't want to bow down to your god Jesus and his
band of bloodthirsty god-followers, who actually seem to believe that
the creator of the entire universe was so jealous that he had to
pretend to be dead for three days in order to forgive people.
Give me a break, georgann. How can you actually believe in such
a far-fetched tale of universal injustice?
--
Elroy Willis
EAP Chief Editor and Newshound
http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news
.
|
|
|
| User: "georgann" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
12 Feb 2004 05:45:24 PM |
|
|
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
Do you have any idea what the problem was with the Canaanites in God's eyes?
"Elroy Willis" wrote:
Yeah, they didn't worship the same god that their foes worshipped, or the god
that the priests were trying to force on people.
Woe to them, and woe to the american natives who fell into the same basket of
barbarism as did the Canaanites. Brutalized and killed, shipped off to
concentration camps and reservations, all because they didn't want to bow down
to your god Jesus and his band of bloodthirsty god-followers, who actually
seem to believe that the creator of the entire universe was so jealous that he
had to pretend to be dead for three days in order to forgive people.
Give me a break, georgann. How can you actually believe in such a far-fetched
tale of universal injustice?
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
That's your farfetched tale, Elroy. Seeing Nazis under every rock now are
we? I don't consider God's will with regard to the Canaanites in any way
unjust. And it has nothing to do with the god they worshipped. That's only
how you see it.
--
(`'·.¸(`'·.¸(`'·.¸ ¸.·'´)¸.·'´)¸.·'´)
«´¨`·.¸¸ ¸¸.·´¨ `»
All your prophecy are belong to Christ!
(¸.·'´(¸.·'´(¸.·'´ `'·.¸)`'·.¸)`'·.¸)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
12 Feb 2004 08:27:30 PM |
|
|
And so upon Thu, 12 Feb 2004 23:45:24 +0000 didst georgann speak thusly:
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
Do you have any idea what the problem was with the Canaanites in God's eyes?
"Elroy Willis" wrote:
Yeah, they didn't worship the same god that their foes worshipped, or the god
that the priests were trying to force on people.
Woe to them, and woe to the american natives who fell into the same basket of
barbarism as did the Canaanites. Brutalized and killed, shipped off to
concentration camps and reservations, all because they didn't want to bow down
to your god Jesus and his band of bloodthirsty god-followers, who actually
seem to believe that the creator of the entire universe was so jealous that he
had to pretend to be dead for three days in order to forgive people.
Give me a break, georgann. How can you actually believe in such a far-fetched
tale of universal injustice?
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
That's your farfetched tale, Elroy. Seeing Nazis under every rock now are
we? I don't consider God's will with regard to the Canaanites in any way
unjust. And it has nothing to do with the god they worshipped. That's only
how you see it.
No, you're just an evil person justifying a slaughter.
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"There is no system but GNU, and Linux is one of its kernels."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
13 Feb 2004 09:48:32 AM |
|
|
In article <pan.2004.02.13.02.27.30.265394@hoo.com-amikchi>, Mark K. Bilbo
says...
And so upon Thu, 12 Feb 2004 23:45:24 +0000 didst georgann speak thusly:
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
Do you have any idea what the problem was with the Canaanites in God's eyes?
"Elroy Willis" wrote:
Yeah, they didn't worship the same god that their foes worshipped, or the god
that the priests were trying to force on people.
Woe to them, and woe to the american natives who fell into the same basket of
barbarism as did the Canaanites. Brutalized and killed, shipped off to
concentration camps and reservations, all because they didn't want to bow down
to your god Jesus and his band of bloodthirsty god-followers, who actually
seem to believe that the creator of the entire universe was so jealous that he
had to pretend to be dead for three days in order to forgive people.
Give me a break, georgann. How can you actually believe in such a far-fetched
tale of universal injustice?
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
That's your farfetched tale, Elroy. Seeing Nazis under every rock now are
we? I don't consider God's will with regard to the Canaanites in any way
unjust. And it has nothing to do with the god they worshipped. That's only
how you see it.
No, you're just an evil person justifying a slaughter.
Indeed, as well as the idea of infants being ripped from their mothers' arms and
sadistically murdered.
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "georgann" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
13 Feb 2004 01:25:50 PM |
|
|
That's your farfetched tale, Elroy. Seeing Nazis under every rock now are
we? I don't consider God's will with regard to the Canaanites in any way
unjust. And it has nothing to do with the god they worshipped. That's only
how you see it.
No, you're just an evil person justifying a slaughter.
"Robibnikoff" wrote:
Indeed, as well as the idea of infants being ripped from their mothers' arms
and sadistically murdered.
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
....unlike babies that are literally ripped from their mothers' bodies in
today's government sanctioned albeit protected abortion mills. Yes I can see
how haughty you might feel at the advances man has made in 4000 years.
--
(`'·.¸(`'·.¸(`'·.¸ ¸.·'´)¸.·'´)¸.·'´)
«´¨`·.¸¸ ¸¸.·´¨ `»
All your prophecy are belong to Christ!
(¸.·'´(¸.·'´(¸.·'´ `'·.¸)`'·.¸)`'·.¸)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
13 Feb 2004 03:03:22 PM |
|
|
And so upon Fri, 13 Feb 2004 19:25:50 +0000 didst georgann speak thusly:
That's your farfetched tale, Elroy. Seeing Nazis under every rock now are
we? I don't consider God's will with regard to the Canaanites in any way
unjust. And it has nothing to do with the god they worshipped. That's only
how you see it.
No, you're just an evil person justifying a slaughter.
"Robibnikoff" wrote:
Indeed, as well as the idea of infants being ripped from their mothers' arms
and sadistically murdered.
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
...unlike babies that are literally ripped from their mothers' bodies in
today's government sanctioned albeit protected abortion mills. Yes I can see
how haughty you might feel at the advances man has made in 4000 years.
Oh, well, long as you can claim somebody *else did it too, that makes it
all right...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"There is no system but GNU, and Linux is one of its kernels."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
13 Feb 2004 01:34:14 PM |
|
|
In article <BC528EED.35364919%chenault@mindspring.com>, georgann says...
That's your farfetched tale, Elroy. Seeing Nazis under every rock now are
we? I don't consider God's will with regard to the Canaanites in any way
unjust. And it has nothing to do with the god they worshipped. That's only
how you see it.
No, you're just an evil person justifying a slaughter.
"Robibnikoff" wrote:
Indeed, as well as the idea of infants being ripped from their mothers' arms
and sadistically murdered.
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
...unlike babies that are literally ripped from their mothers' bodies in
today's government sanctioned albeit protected abortion mills.
Oh, I see. It's only okay when your god does it?
Yes I can see
how haughty you might feel at the advances man has made in 4000 years.
Haughty? The only haughty one I see here is you, Ms. Over-inflated Ego.
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Elroy Willis" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
13 Feb 2004 01:34:30 PM |
|
|
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote in alt.atheism
"Robibnikoff" wrote:
Indeed, as well as the idea of infants being ripped from their mothers' arms
and sadistically murdered.
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
...unlike babies that are literally ripped from their mothers' bodies in
today's government sanctioned albeit protected abortion mills.
Wow, the "Age of Aquarius" has turned into an abortion debate.
Go figure.
--
Elroy Willis
EAP Chief Editor and Newshound
http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
13 Feb 2004 09:56:48 AM |
|
|
And so upon Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:48:32 +0000 didst Robibnikoff speak
thusly:
In article <pan.2004.02.13.02.27.30.265394@hoo.com-amikchi>, Mark K. Bilbo
says...
And so upon Thu, 12 Feb 2004 23:45:24 +0000 didst georgann speak thusly:
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
Do you have any idea what the problem was with the Canaanites in God's eyes?
"Elroy Willis" wrote:
Yeah, they didn't worship the same god that their foes worshipped, or the god
that the priests were trying to force on people.
Woe to them, and woe to the american natives who fell into the same basket of
barbarism as did the Canaanites. Brutalized and killed, shipped off to
concentration camps and reservations, all because they didn't want to bow down
to your god Jesus and his band of bloodthirsty god-followers, who actually
seem to believe that the creator of the entire universe was so jealous that he
had to pretend to be dead for three days in order to forgive people.
Give me a break, georgann. How can you actually believe in such a far-fetched
tale of universal injustice?
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
That's your farfetched tale, Elroy. Seeing Nazis under every rock now are
we? I don't consider God's will with regard to the Canaanites in any way
unjust. And it has nothing to do with the god they worshipped. That's only
how you see it.
No, you're just an evil person justifying a slaughter.
Indeed, as well as the idea of infants being ripped from their mothers' arms and
sadistically murdered.
I guess she figures if it makes Jeebus happy...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"There is no system but GNU, and Linux is one of its kernels."
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Elroy Willis" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
13 Feb 2004 11:56:24 AM |
|
|
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote in alt.atheism
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
Do you have any idea what the problem was with the Canaanites in God's eyes?
"Elroy Willis" wrote:
Yeah, they didn't worship the same god that their foes worshipped, or the god
that the priests were trying to force on people.
Woe to them, and woe to the american natives who fell into the same basket of
barbarism as did the Canaanites. Brutalized and killed, shipped off to
concentration camps and reservations, all because they didn't want to bow down
to your god Jesus and his band of bloodthirsty god-followers, who actually
seem to believe that the creator of the entire universe was so jealous that he
had to pretend to be dead for three days in order to forgive people.
Give me a break, georgann. How can you actually believe in such a far-fetched
tale of universal injustice?
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
That's your farfetched tale, Elroy. Seeing Nazis under every rock now are
we?
You see pagans under rocks, don't you?
--
Elroy Willis
EAP Chief Editor and Newshound
http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news
.
|
|
|
| User: "georgann" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
13 Feb 2004 01:27:55 PM |
|
|
Woe to them, and woe to the american natives who fell into the same basket
of barbarism as did the Canaanites. Brutalized and killed, shipped off to
concentration camps and reservations, all because they didn't want to bow
down to your god Jesus and his band of bloodthirsty god-followers, who
actually seem to believe that the creator of the entire universe was so
jealous that he had to pretend to be dead for three days in order to forgive
people.
Give me a break, georgann. How can you actually believe in such a
far-fetched tale of universal injustice?
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
That's your farfetched tale, Elroy. Seeing Nazis under every rock now are we?
"Elroy Willis" wrote:
You see pagans under rocks, don't you?
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
Isn't that where they all hail from? :/
--
(`'·.¸(`'·.¸(`'·.¸ ¸.·'´)¸.·'´)¸.·'´)
«´¨`·.¸¸ ¸¸.·´¨ `»
All your prophecy are belong to Christ!
(¸.·'´(¸.·'´(¸.·'´ `'·.¸)`'·.¸)`'·.¸)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
13 Feb 2004 03:14:12 PM |
|
|
And so upon Fri, 13 Feb 2004 19:27:55 +0000 didst georgann speak thusly:
Woe to them, and woe to the american natives who fell into the same basket
of barbarism as did the Canaanites. Brutalized and killed, shipped off to
concentration camps and reservations, all because they didn't want to bow
down to your god Jesus and his band of bloodthirsty god-followers, who
actually seem to believe that the creator of the entire universe was so
jealous that he had to pretend to be dead for three days in order to forgive
people.
Give me a break, georgann. How can you actually believe in such a
far-fetched tale of universal injustice?
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
That's your farfetched tale, Elroy. Seeing Nazis under every rock now are we?
"Elroy Willis" wrote:
You see pagans under rocks, don't you?
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
Isn't that where they all hail from? :/
Evil ***** time again. Do you do this monthly or is it an all year thing
for you?
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"There is no system but GNU, and Linux is one of its kernels."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
13 Feb 2004 02:09:38 PM |
|
|
In article <BC528F6A.3536491A%chenault@mindspring.com>, georgann says...
Woe to them, and woe to the american natives who fell into the same basket
of barbarism as did the Canaanites. Brutalized and killed, shipped off to
concentration camps and reservations, all because they didn't want to bow
down to your god Jesus and his band of bloodthirsty god-followers, who
actually seem to believe that the creator of the entire universe was so
jealous that he had to pretend to be dead for three days in order to forgive
people.
Give me a break, georgann. How can you actually believe in such a
far-fetched tale of universal injustice?
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
That's your farfetched tale, Elroy. Seeing Nazis under every rock now are we?
"Elroy Willis" wrote:
You see pagans under rocks, don't you?
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
Isn't that where they all hail from? :/
Funny, but all the Pagans I know live in either houses, condos or apartments.
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Elroy Willis" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
13 Feb 2004 01:37:35 PM |
|
|
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote in alt.atheism
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
That's your farfetched tale, Elroy. Seeing Nazis under every rock now are we?
"Elroy Willis" wrote:
You see pagans under rocks, don't you?
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
Isn't that where they all hail from? :/
Do you actually see any religion other than your own as pagan?
Just curious.
--
Elroy Willis
EAP Chief Editor and Newshound
http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Buchanan" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
12 Feb 2004 01:02:49 PM |
|
|
Elroy Willis fascinated us all by typing:
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote in alt.atheism
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
I have no problem with God telling the Jews to wipe out the Canaanites
however He told them to do it.
Wow, an admission that genocide is sometimes a good thing, in
the eyes of georgann's god. She'd make a good oven-lighter for
the furnaces in hell, or maybe as a follower of a hitler-like savior
or king.
Do you have any idea what the problem was with the Canaanites
in God's eyes?
Yeah, they didn't worship the same god that their foes worshipped,
or the god that the priests were trying to force on people.
Woe to them, and woe to the american natives who fell into
the same basket of barbarism as did the Canaanites. Brutalized
and killed, shipped off to concentration camps and reservations, all
because they didn't want to bow down to your god Jesus and his
band of bloodthirsty god-followers, who actually seem to believe that
the creator of the entire universe was so jealous that he had to
pretend to be dead for three days in order to forgive people.
Give me a break, georgann. How can you actually believe in such
a far-fetched tale of universal injustice?
She's STUPID. She'll believe anything in that nutty book.
--
Robert Buchanan
http://home.ripway.com/2004-1/55797/
"We want a simpler and more melodic style for music, a simple, less
complicated emotional state, and dissonance again relegated to its proper
place as one element of music...I think we have gone as far as we are
likely to go in the direction of size, or dissonance, or complexity of
music. Music, in other words, has definitely reached and passed the
greatest degree of discord and complexity that can be attained in practice.
I want nothing better, more flexible or more complete than the sonata form,
which contains everything necessary for my structural purposes."
-Sergei Prokofiev
Scott "Son of Chaney" Gilbert puts a price on my head:
Still wanted to buy - address of Robert Buchanan (sockpuppet name Uncle
Whoopass). Name your price, but the address has to be 100% correct. This
offer is quite serious - if you know this fucktard and want to make some
serious coin, contact me."
<vbtWb.18092$Ch.2141@bignews6.bellsouth.net>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
12 Feb 2004 08:28:07 PM |
|
|
And so upon Thu, 12 Feb 2004 19:02:49 +0000 didst Robert Buchanan speak
thusly:
Elroy Willis fascinated us all by typing:
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote in alt.atheism
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
I have no problem with God telling the Jews to wipe out the Canaanites
however He told them to do it.
Wow, an admission that genocide is sometimes a good thing, in
the eyes of georgann's god. She'd make a good oven-lighter for
the furnaces in hell, or maybe as a follower of a hitler-like savior
or king.
Do you have any idea what the problem was with the Canaanites
in God's eyes?
Yeah, they didn't worship the same god that their foes worshipped,
or the god that the priests were trying to force on people.
Woe to them, and woe to the american natives who fell into
the same basket of barbarism as did the Canaanites. Brutalized
and killed, shipped off to concentration camps and reservations, all
because they didn't want to bow down to your god Jesus and his
band of bloodthirsty god-followers, who actually seem to believe that
the creator of the entire universe was so jealous that he had to
pretend to be dead for three days in order to forgive people.
Give me a break, georgann. How can you actually believe in such
a far-fetched tale of universal injustice?
She's STUPID. She'll believe anything in that nutty book.
Hell, she doesn't even actually believe that book, she makes the crap up
as she goes along...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"There is no system but GNU, and Linux is one of its kernels."
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
12 Feb 2004 08:37:07 PM |
|
|
In article <pan.2004.02.13.02.28.06.757202@hoo.com-amikchi>,
Mark K. Bilbo <y@hoo.com-amikchi> wrote:
Hell, she doesn't even actually believe that book, she makes the crap up
as she goes along...
Exactly!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
