Al Qaeda Threat to London Uncovered! Liberals Hate America!



 Religions > Atheism > Al Qaeda Threat to London Uncovered! Liberals Hate America!

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "DemocRATs Hate America"
Date: 14 Aug 2004 10:00:22 AM
Object: Al Qaeda Threat to London Uncovered! Liberals Hate America!
Al Qaeda Threat to London Uncovered! Liberals Hate America!
Evening Standard; London (UK) 08/02/2004
FEARS of a terror atrocity in London were raised today after plans for
new attacks against the US and Britain were found on a computer seized
during the arrest of a senior al Qaeda suspect. Pakistani intelligence
agents said the plans were found in emails on the computer of
Tanzanian Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani, wanted for the 1998 US embassy
bombings in East Africa, who was arrested last week. Informat ion
minister Sheikh Rashid Ahmed said today: "We got a few emails from
Ghailani's computer about [plans for] attacks in the US and UK."
FEARS of a terror atrocity in London were raised today after plans for
new attacks against the US and Britain were found on a computer seized
during the arrest of a senior al Qaeda suspect.
Pakistani intelligence agents said the plans were found in emails on
the computer of Tanzanian Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani, wanted for the 1998
US embassy bombings in East Africa, who was arrested last week.
Informat ion minister Sheikh Rashid Ahmed said today: "We got a few
emails from Ghailani's computer about [plans for] attacks in the US
and UK."
In Britain, the Home Office said there was no new information about a
specific threat. A spokesman said: "The threat level has not changed;
it remains real and serious."
High-level police and security officials are scrutinising the latest
information. A senior police source said: "The alert situation is
under urgent review."
The revelation comes after US homeland security chief Tom Ridge raised
the alert level to orange - its secondhighest - on five buildings in
New York, Washington and Newark, New Jersey.
US intelligence sources said they had discovered an al Qaeda plan to
destroy the New York Stock Exchange and the World Bank in Washington
with high explosives.
The information that sparked the alert is understood to have come from
Muhammad Naeem Noor Khan, 25, who masterminded a secret communications
network to pass on plot details in code. He was captured in Pakistan
last month.
Big Ben and other key parts of Parliament are set to be protected by
an electric security fence in a bid to foil terrorists and protesters.
A Commons source said today: "It would give you a nasty shock."
©The Pawtucket Times 2004
Good day. Or as John Kerry would say, bonjour.
.

User: "JTEM"

Title: Re: Al Qaeda Threat to London Uncovered! Liberals Hate America! 14 Aug 2004 11:09:56 AM
"DemocRATs Hate America" <zebrax17@yahoo.com> wrote

Al Qaeda Threat to London Uncovered! Liberals Hate America!

You realize, of course, that London isn't in America.
.
User: "Dave Middleton"

Title: 28 Questions for Kerry the Liberal Media will NEVER ask! 14 Aug 2004 07:13:07 PM
28 Questions for Kerry the Liberal Media will NEVER ask!
By George F. Will
WASHINGTON -- In the more than 250 days until Nov. 2, John Kerry can
answer questions that linger in spite of, or because of, all he has
said so far. Such as:
Other than denoting your disapproval, what does the adjective mean in
the phrase "special interest"? Is the National Education Association a
special interest? The AFL-CIO?
You abhor "special tax giveaways for the privileged and special
interests." When supporting billions in ethanol subsidies, mostly for
agribusinesses, did you think about corn-growing, caucus-holding Iowa?
Is the National Rifle Association a "special interest"? Is "special" a
synonym for "conservative"?
When you denounce "lobbyists" do you include those for Planned
Parenthood and the Sierra Club? Is "liberal lobbyist" an oxymoron?
All the Americans affected by laws you pass -- that is, all Americans
-- refuse to pipe down and mind their own business so that you can
mind their business for them. Often they hire lobbyists to exercise
their First
Amendment right to "petition the government for a redress of
grievances." Can you despise lobbyists without disparaging that right?
You say the rich do not pay enough taxes. In 1979 the top 1 percent of
earners paid 19.75 percent of income taxes. Today they pay 36.3
percent. How much is enough?
You say the federal government is not spending enough on education.
President Bush has increased education spending 48 percent. How much
is enough?
In January 1991, after Iraq extinguished Kuwait’s sovereignty, you
opposed responding with force rather than economic sanctions. Have
such sanctions ever undone such aggression?
On Jan. 11, 1991, you said that going to war was abandoning "the
theory of deterrence." Was it not a tad late to deter Iraqi
aggression?
The next day you said, "I do not believe our nation is prepared for
war." How did unpreparedness subsequently manifest itself?
On Jan. 22, 1991, responding to a constituent opposed to the Gulf War,
you wrote "I share your concerns" and would have given sanctions more
time. Nine days later, responding to a voter who favored the war, you
wrote, "I have strongly and unequivocally supported President Bush’s
response to the crisis." Did you have a third position?
You say the Bush administration questions "the patriotism" of its
critics. You say that as president you will "appoint a U.S. trade
representative who is an American patriot." You mean the current
representative, Robert Zoellick, is not a patriot?
You strongly praise former Treasury Secretary Bob Rubin, who strongly
supports NAFTA and free trade. Have you changed your mind about him or
about free trade (as you have changed your mind about No Child Left
Behind, the 2002 war resolution, the Patriot Act, etc.)?
You oppose immediate termination of U.S. involvement in Iraq, and you
opposed the $87 billion to pay for involvement. Come again?
In 1994, the year after the first attack on the World Trade Center,
you voted to cut $1 billion from counterterrorism activities. In 1995
you proposed a $1.5 billion cut in intelligence funding. Are you now
glad that both proposals were defeated?
You favor civil unions but not same-sex marriage. What is the
difference? What consequences of gay marriage worry you? Your state’s
highest court says marriage is"an evolving paradigm." Do you agree?
You say you agree with what ***** Cheney said in 2000: States should
have a right to"come to different
conclusions" about same-sex marriage. Why, then, were you one of only
14 senators who opposed the Defense of Marriage Act, which protects
that right? Massachusetts opponents of the same-sex ruling are moving
for a referendum to amend the state constitution to define marriage as
between a man and a
woman. How will you vote?
You favor full disclosure of political spending. Organized labor is
fighting new regulations requiring full disclosure to union members of
the political uses of their mandatory union dues. As president, would
you rescind these regulations?
Praising McCain-Feingold restrictions on political contributions, you
said: "This bill reduces the power of the checkbook and I will
therefore support it." In December you saved your sagging campaign by
writing it a $6.4 million check. Why is your checkbook’s unfettered
freedom wholesome?
You deny that restricting campaign contributions restricts speech. How
much of the $6.4 million did you spend on speech -- broadcast
messages?
Billionaire George Soros says he will spend whatever is necessary --
just a few million so far, but more coming -- to defeat Bush. As one
who believes -- well, who says -- there is "too much money" in
politics, are you appalled?
There are 28 more questions where these 28 came from.
--
Left-wing liberals are EVERYTHING they accuse the right of being. They
are mean, vicious, hateful, greedy, cold-hearted, closed-minded,
selfish, intolerant, bigoted and racist.
.

User: "Dave Middleton"

Title: Al Franken's begging for $ to stay on the air already! Shamless liberal pimp shows his colors. 14 Aug 2004 07:12:19 PM
Al Franken's begging for $ to stay on the air already! Shamless
liberal pimp shows his colors.
Today's episode was a gang bang of President Bush lead by by none
other than call in guest Hillary Roadkill Clinton.
(Warning - rant mode on)
Hillary Clinton, that "paragon of virtue", of Whitewater fame who is
well qualified to sit on her 'tower of self righteousness', in
judgement of President Bush. This is the same Hillary Clinton, who
dodged the investigation by hiding records, that mysteriously appeared
in the white house living quarters years after they were under
subpoena by the federal government. The same Hillary Clinton, that
"had no specific
memory" of key events surrounding the shenanigans that she and her
buffoon husband were before
and during their presidency.
(rant mode off)
But the most comical part is that since Franken can't get anyone to
advertise on the program, that are already begging for donations.
This isn't surprizing, because that's what liberals do, when they
can't compete in in the marketplace, they claimthat things like
discrimination, or the field isn't level. Then they will eventually
take it from those of us that earn our way in the form of taxes.
Should be interesting to see how long Franken and crew last...
.
User: "Ninure Saunders"

Title: Re: Bomshell! 15 Aug 2004 09:41:36 AM
"I think the important thing for us is not to be overly fixated on
Saddam Hussein."
"How many American lives is toppling Saddam Hussein worth? My answer
to that is not very damn many."
- ***** Cheney, on Face the Nation, January 1992
"We should not march into Baghdad. To occupy Iraq would instantly shatter
our coalition, turning the whole Arab world against us and make a broken
tyrant into a latter-day Arab hero. Assigning young soldiers to a fruitless
hunt for a securely entrenched dictator and condemning them to fight in
what would be an unwinable urban guerilla war, it could only plunge that
part of the world into ever greater instability."
- George H. W. Bush in his 1998 book "A World Transformed",
--"We were concerned about the long-term balance of power at the head of
the Gulf...The coalition would instantly have collapsed...Going in and
occupying Iraq, thus unilaterally
exceeding the U.N.'s mandate,would have destroyed the precedent of
international response to aggression we hoped to establish .Had we gone
the invasion route, the U.S. could conceivably still be an occupying power
in a bitterly hostile land. It would have been a dramatically
different--and perhaps barren--outcome."
-- George Herbert Walker Bush
http://www.mediawhoresonline.com/
Trent Lott reacts to Clinton military action
(Operation Desert Fox - 12/98):
"I cannot support this military action in the Persian Gulf at this time.
Both the timing and the policy are subject to question. I am opposed to
endangering the lives of brave American men and women in the military for
action in Iraq that will not effect real change in that nation."--Trent
Lott, in midst of Operation Desert Fox
"Senator Lott, who surprised some Republicans with his statement of
opposition to an overseas military enterprise, said he favored a 'more
clearly defined' operation."--(NYT, 12/98)
Ninure Saunders aka Rainbow Christian
http://Rainbow-Christian.tk
The Lord is my Shepherd and He knows I'm Gay
http://Ninure-Saunders.tk
Take my polls
http://ninure.100megsfree5.com
My Yahoo Group
http://Ninure.tk
My Online Diary
http://www.ninure.deardiary.net
-
Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches
http://www.MCCchurch.org
The Bible Site - help provide free scripture
http://www.thebiblesite.org
To send e-mail, remove nohate from address
.

User: "old whats his name"

Title: Re: Al Franken's begging for $ to stay on the air already! Shamless liberal pimp shows his colors. 14 Aug 2004 10:13:36 PM
Couldn't happen to a nice guy. Glad to see him go. Adios.
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 20:12:19 -0400, Dave Middleton
<dmiddleton@N0TSPAM.0RG> wrote:

Al Franken's begging for $ to stay on the air already! Shamless
liberal pimp shows his colors.


Today's episode was a gang bang of President Bush lead by by none
other than call in guest Hillary Roadkill Clinton.

(Warning - rant mode on)

Hillary Clinton, that "paragon of virtue", of Whitewater fame who is
well qualified to sit on her 'tower of self righteousness', in
judgement of President Bush. This is the same Hillary Clinton, who
dodged the investigation by hiding records, that mysteriously appeared
in the white house living quarters years after they were under
subpoena by the federal government. The same Hillary Clinton, that
"had no specific
memory" of key events surrounding the shenanigans that she and her
buffoon husband were before
and during their presidency.

(rant mode off)

But the most comical part is that since Franken can't get anyone to
advertise on the program, that are already begging for donations.
This isn't surprizing, because that's what liberals do, when they
can't compete in in the marketplace, they claimthat things like
discrimination, or the field isn't level. Then they will eventually
take it from those of us that earn our way in the form of taxes.
Should be interesting to see how long Franken and crew last...


.
User: "Douglas Berry"

Title: Re: Al Franken's begging for $ to stay on the air already! Shamless liberal pimp shows his colors. 15 Aug 2004 11:36:26 AM
In our last thrilling episode, old whats his name
<glbecker@hotmail.com> was pushed over the cliffs of alt.atheism on
Sat, 14 Aug 2004 22:13:36 -0500 by Zoog, minion of Zathar. As he
fell, he screamed:

Couldn't happen to a nice guy. Glad to see him go. Adios.

This article is months old.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.


User: "Rev. 11D Ricardo MadGello"

Title: Re: Al Franken's begging for $ to stay on the air already! Shamless liberal pimp shows his colors. 14 Aug 2004 07:31:31 PM
I like your little Freudian slip there in the subject line, sportini.
"Shamless", yep, that's sure something Cheney/DUHbya know nothing about.
"Dave Middleton" <dmiddleton@N0TSPAM.0RG> wrote in message
news:4iath0h4scsv5rt1ac4q6apil7ibkd6pc0@4ax.com...

More DUH spew from DUH neoKKKons..

.

User: "Paul Harper"

Title: Re: Bomshell! 15 Aug 2004 03:54:41 AM
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 03:45:17 -0400, "Win With GOP!"
<gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:

Explosive new evidence proves Clinton was a failure!

Explosive new evidence proves the Repugs are getting increasingly
desperate!
Paul.
--
.. A .sig is all well and good, but it's no substitute for a personality
.. JMS: "SFX is a fairly useless publication on just about every imaginable front.
Never have so many jumped-up fanboys done so little, with so much, for so long."
.. EMail: Unless invited to, don't. Your message is likely to be automatically deleted.
.
User: "Fred Stone"

Title: Re: Bomshell! 15 Aug 2004 07:24:29 AM
Paul Harper <paul@harper.net> wrote in
news:b59uh0116b3u9b9b5rmc5q73t5t3bt01bl@4ax.com:

On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 03:45:17 -0400, "Win With GOP!"
<gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:

Explosive new evidence proves Clinton was a failure!


Explosive new evidence proves the Repugs are getting increasingly
desperate!

Explosive old evidence proves that Democrats lack imagination!
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil?
.
User: "Uncle Dollar Bill"

Title: Re: Bomshell! 15 Aug 2004 11:37:34 AM
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 12:24:29 GMT in alt.atheism, Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> defied the status quo and scrawled upon the toilet
stall:

Paul Harper <paul@harper.net> wrote in
news:b59uh0116b3u9b9b5rmc5q73t5t3bt01bl@4ax.com:

On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 03:45:17 -0400, "Win With GOP!"
<gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:

Explosive new evidence proves Clinton was a failure!


Explosive new evidence proves the Repugs are getting increasingly
desperate!


Explosive old evidence proves that Democrats lack imagination!

Explosive ancient evidence proves that we're all screwed! {=-#
--
L8r,
Uncle Dollar Bill
.




User: "Paul Harper"

Title: Re: Al Qaeda Threat to London Uncovered! Liberals Hate America! 14 Aug 2004 06:41:02 PM
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 12:09:56 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
wrote:


"DemocRATs Hate America" <zebrax17@yahoo.com> wrote

Al Qaeda Threat to London Uncovered! Liberals Hate America!


You realize, of course, that London isn't in America.

And you have no fucking idea how grateful we are that THAT is true.
Paul (Londoner)
--
.. A .sig is all well and good, but it's no substitute for a personality
.. JMS: "SFX is a fairly useless publication on just about every imaginable front.
Never have so many jumped-up fanboys done so little, with so much, for so long."
.. EMail: Unless invited to, don't. Your message is likely to be automatically deleted.
.
User: "JTEM"

Title: Re: Al Qaeda Threat to London Uncovered! Liberals Hate America! 15 Aug 2004 02:40:54 AM
"Paul Harper" <paul@harper.net> wrote

You realize, of course, that London isn't in America.

And you have no fucking idea how grateful we are that
THAT is true.

Speaking of which...
.

User: "Ian Braidwood"

Title: Re: Al Qaeda Threat to London Uncovered! Liberals Hate America! 15 Aug 2004 05:15:09 AM
Paul Harper <paul@harper.net> wrote in message news:<fn8th0paf71nt6271hfrnqbmf6uqrvuoep@4ax.com>...

On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 12:09:56 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
wrote:


"DemocRATs Hate America" <zebrax17@yahoo.com> wrote

Al Qaeda Threat to London Uncovered! Liberals Hate America!


You realize, of course, that London isn't in America.


And you have no fucking idea how grateful we are that THAT is true.

Paul (Londoner)

Seconded.
(-: Ian :-) (just south of Londoner)
.



User: "Paul Harper"

Title: Re: Al Qaeda Threat to London Uncovered! Liberals Hate America! 14 Aug 2004 10:24:51 AM
On 14 Aug 2004 08:00:22 -0700,
(DemocRATs Hate
America) wrote:

Evening Standard; London (UK) 08/02/2004

Yup. Nearly two weeks ago. Please - do at least *try* to keep up at
the back.
Paul.
--
.. A .sig is all well and good, but it's no substitute for a personality
.. JMS: "SFX is a fairly useless publication on just about every imaginable front.
Never have so many jumped-up fanboys done so little, with so much, for so long."
.. EMail: Unless invited to, don't. Your message is likely to be automatically deleted.
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER