Religions > Atheism > All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Under the Law
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
05 Nov 2007 05:18:29 PM |
| Object: |
All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Under the Law |
http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=PR07I05&f=WX06L03
FRC to Congress: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal
Justice Under the Law
Washington D.C. - Family Research Council President Tony Perkins
called the Senate vote on so-called hate crimes "a discriminatory move
creating second-class victims." The Senate voted 60-39 on an amendment
offered by Sen. Ted Kennedy to the Defense Authorization bill which
would give the federal government jurisdiction over virtually every
"hate crime," regardless of whether the states seek federal
involvement. The provision would also add "sexual orientation" and
gender identity to the list of "hate crimes" already covered by
federal law.
"A vote in favor of so-called 'hate crimes' legislation today is a
direct violation of the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause,"
Perkins said. "Congress needs to remember that preserving equal
justice under the law is more important than scoring points with
advocates of homosexual behavior."
"All violent crimes are hate crimes, and every victim is equally
important. We applaud the President's intention to veto this
unconstitutional betrayal of victims' rights. All our citizens deserve
equal justice under the law. Congress should represent all Americans,
not give special protections for some."
.
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Under the Law |
06 Nov 2007 09:28:56 AM |
|
|
"J Young" <younginsights@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1194304709.184721.246140@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=PR07I05&f=WX06L03
FRC to Congress: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal
Justice Under the Law
Enhanced punishments are unconstitutional.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brian Westley" |
|
| Title: Re: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Under the Law |
06 Nov 2007 10:56:29 AM |
|
|
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"J Young" <younginsights@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1194304709.184721.246140@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=PR07I05&f=WX06L03
FRC to Congress: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal
Justice Under the Law
Enhanced punishments are unconstitutional.
Motivation has always been a factor in e.g. unlawful killing.
It's the difference between manslaughter and murder.
---
Merlyn LeRoy
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lars Eighner" |
|
| Title: Re: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Under the Law |
06 Nov 2007 12:42:28 PM |
|
|
In our last episode, <WK%Xi.17250$a9.4734@bignews5.bellsouth.net>, the
lovely and talented John D. Wentzky broadcast on tx.politics:
"J Young" <younginsights@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1194304709.184721.246140@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=PR07I05&f=WX06L03
FRC to Congress: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal
Justice Under the Law
Enhanced punishments are unconstitutional.
Of course they are not.
--
Lars Eighner <http://larseighner.com/> <http://myspace.com/larseighner>
Countdown: 440 days to go.
What do you do when you're debranded?
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Under the Law |
06 Nov 2007 01:41:42 PM |
|
|
"Lars Eighner" <usenet@larseighner.com> wrote in message
news:slrnfj1d9u.2tjs.usenet@debranded.larseighner.com...
In our last episode, <WK%Xi.17250$a9.4734@bignews5.bellsouth.net>, the
lovely and talented John D. Wentzky broadcast on tx.politics:
"J Young" <younginsights@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1194304709.184721.246140@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=PR07I05&f=WX06L03
FRC to Congress: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal
Justice Under the Law
Enhanced punishments are unconstitutional.
Of course they are not.
Ridiculous.
There are constitutitional prohibitions against excessive fines and
excessive punishments and against cruel and unusual punishment.
You are not understanding the requirements of the Constitution that do not
allow enhanced punishments to be used against any person via any sort of
hate crime legislation.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Scruffy McScruffovitch" |
|
| Title: Re: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Under the Law |
06 Nov 2007 02:55:57 PM |
|
|
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:Vr3Yi.67120$c9.51298@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
"Lars Eighner" <usenet@larseighner.com> wrote in message
news:slrnfj1d9u.2tjs.usenet@debranded.larseighner.com...
In our last episode, <WK%Xi.17250$a9.4734@bignews5.bellsouth.net>, the
lovely and talented John D. Wentzky broadcast on tx.politics:
"J Young" <younginsights@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1194304709.184721.246140@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=PR07I05&f=WX06L03
FRC to Congress: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal
Justice Under the Law
Enhanced punishments are unconstitutional.
Of course they are not.
Ridiculous.
There are constitutitional prohibitions against excessive fines
Enhanced does not necessarily equate to excessive.
and excessive punishments
Enhanced does not necessarily equate to excessive.
and against cruel and unusual punishment.
Which does not apply in the case of hate crime legislation.
You are not understanding the requirements of the Constitution that do not
allow enhanced punishments
The Constitution does not mention enhanced punishments at all, just
excessive. The two terms are not interchangeable.
to be used against any person via any sort of hate crime legislation.
Your facts are ridiculous, your premise is logically flawed, and your
conclusion is erroneous.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Under the Law |
06 Nov 2007 09:25:40 PM |
|
|
"Scruffy McScruffovitch" <Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote in message
news:yx4Yi.3068$3Z2.114@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com...
Your gay pride lingo is failing you.
Enhanced = extra, excessive, additional, augmented.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Scruffy McScruffovitch" |
|
| Title: Re: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Under the Law |
06 Nov 2007 10:06:18 PM |
|
|
In News UeaYi.22636$u7.16805@bignews2.bellsouth.net,, John D. Wentzky at
wxpprofessional@msn.com, typed this:
"Scruffy McScruffovitch" <Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote in message
news:yx4Yi.3068$3Z2.114@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com...
Your gay pride lingo is failing you.
Not being gay, it's of no consequence.
Enhanced = extra, excessive, additional, augmented.
No, enhanced does not mean excessive, liar Wentzky.
en搬ance
1. to raise to a higher degree; intensify; magnify: The candelight
enhanced her beauty.
2. to raise the value or price of: Rarity enhances the worth of old
coins.
ex搾es新ive
going beyond the usual, necessary, or proper limit or degree;
characterized by excess: excessive charges; excessive criticism.
To raise to a higher degree does not, by necessity equate to going beyond
the proper degree.
As can plainly be seen, these words have different meaning. They are not
interchangeable terms. Enhanced penalties are not unconstitutional.
--
"A government big enough to give you everything you want is strong
enough to take away everything you have."
Thomas Jefferson
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Under the Law |
07 Nov 2007 02:16:58 PM |
|
|
"Scruffy McScruffovitch" <Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote in message
news:0OudnWyFc4onpKzanZ2dnUVZ_uuqnZ2d@comcast.com...
In News UeaYi.22636$u7.16805@bignews2.bellsouth.net,, John D. Wentzky at
wxpprofessional@msn.com, typed this:
"Scruffy McScruffovitch" <Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote in message
news:yx4Yi.3068$3Z2.114@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com...
Your gay pride lingo is failing you.
Not being gay, it's of no consequence.
Which means that if any gay attacks any non-gay that the gays can be judged
by their ***** law.
LOL!
Enhanced = extra, excessive, additional, augmented.
No, enhanced does not mean excessive, liar Wentzky.
Wrong, ***** presenter.
en搬ance
1. to raise to a higher degree; intensify; magnify:
Synonymous with excessive in light of the Constitutional meaning.
The candelight enhanced her beauty.
2. to raise the value or price of: Rarity enhances the worth of old
coins.
Enhanced, raised higher, punishments are excessive punisments.
ex搾es新ive
going beyond the usual, necessary, or proper limit or degree;
Yes, and the meanings of enhanced show you the reason that enhanced
punishments are also deemd cruel and unusual.
characterized by excess: excessive charges; excessive criticism.
Yet, you fail to recognize that enhancements do create excess in the area of
punishment.
To raise to a higher degree does not, by necessity equate to going beyond
the proper degree.
In the case of punishments, you are in error.
You are showing your favor for punishing persons ecessively and without
merit.
As can plainly be seen, these words have different meaning.
As can be seen, you do not show me anything other than an allegiance to that
which will not allow you to attain forgiveness if you slip.
They are not interchangeable terms.
The term enhanced is being used in an unconstitutional manner.
Is it an atheistic tendency to wish such punishments upon people that
violate the constitutional prohibitions?
Enhanced penalties are not unconstitutional.
*****.
If you do not want to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation, gays
will be subjected to enhanced punishments anytime they commit any crime
against anyone of a sexual orientation other than gay.
Giovanni committed the crimes of intimidation and assault against me in
violation of my constitutional rights after I asked him if he was a
homosexual after he had lied to me and performed in a criminally negligent
manner towards me.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Scruffy McScruffovitch" |
|
| Title: Re: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Under the Law |
07 Nov 2007 02:55:14 PM |
|
|
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:%2pYi.18087$a9.11266@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
"Scruffy McScruffovitch" <Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote in message
news:0OudnWyFc4onpKzanZ2dnUVZ_uuqnZ2d@comcast.com...
In News UeaYi.22636$u7.16805@bignews2.bellsouth.net,, John D. Wentzky at
wxpprofessional@msn.com, typed this:
"Scruffy McScruffovitch" <Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote in message
news:yx4Yi.3068$3Z2.114@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com...
Your gay pride lingo is failing you.
Not being gay, it's of no consequence.
Which means that if any gay attacks any non-gay that the gays can be
judged by their ***** law.
LOL!
Enhanced = extra, excessive, additional, augmented.
No, enhanced does not mean excessive, liar Wentzky.
Wrong, ***** presenter.
Nope, I am 100% correct. Dictionary definitions are different.
en搬ance
1. to raise to a higher degree; intensify; magnify:
Synonymous with excessive in light of the Constitutional meaning.
Not even remotely, liar Wentzky.
The candelight enhanced her beauty.
2. to raise the value or price of: Rarity enhances the worth of old
coins.
Enhanced, raised higher,
But the Constitution does not mention Enhanced, only Excessive.
punishments are excessive punisments.
Not according to the Constitution.
ex搾es新ive
going beyond the usual, necessary, or proper limit or degree;
Yes, and the meanings of enhanced show you the reason that enhanced
punishments are also deemd cruel and unusual.
Nothing in the Constitution discusses enhanced punishments, nor defines
them, only excessive. Nothing in the Constitution has deemed enhanced
punishments to be either cruel, or unusual.
characterized by excess: excessive charges; excessive criticism.
Yet, you fail to recognize that enhancements do create excess in the area
of punishment.
Because it's not true, liar Wentzky.
To raise to a higher degree does not, by necessity equate to going beyond
the proper degree.
In the case of punishments, you are in error.
No liar Wentzky, I am 100% correct.
You are showing your favor for punishing persons ecessively and without
merit.
No, I am logically disassembling your spurious arguments.
As can plainly be seen, these words have different meaning.
As can be seen, you do not show me anything other than an allegiance to
that which will not allow you to attain forgiveness if you slip.
Blah, blah, blah. Do you have anything of value to add, you're starting to
bore me.
They are not interchangeable terms.
The term enhanced is being used in an unconstitutional manner.
*****. The only one of the two terms mentioned at all in the
Constitution in this context is excessive. Enhanced does not necessarily
equate to excessive. They are not interchangeable terms.
Is it an atheistic tendency to wish such punishments upon people that
violate the constitutional prohibitions?
They don't, liar Wentzky.
Enhanced penalties are not unconstitutional.
*****.
No, I am 100% correct.
[snip remainder of stupid rant]
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Under the Law |
07 Nov 2007 04:27:34 PM |
|
|
"Scruffy McScruffovitch" <Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote in message
news:SCpYi.19109$lD6.10655@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:%2pYi.18087$a9.11266@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
Enhanced, raised higher,
But the Constitution does not mention Enhanced, only Excessive.
That's why you homosexual perverts decided to pick the word enhanced,
thinking it would deceive people into believing your propaganda.
punishments are excessive punisments.
Not according to the Constitution.
The Constitution doesn't tell you that.
ex搾es新ive
going beyond the usual, necessary, or proper limit or degree;
Yes, and the meanings of enhanced show you the reason that enhanced
punishments are also deemd cruel and unusual.
Nothing in the Constitution discusses enhanced punishments, nor defines
them, only excessive. Nothing in the Constitution has deemed enhanced
punishments to be either cruel, or unusual.
*****.
The Constitution itself forbids cruel and unusual punihsment.
Since enhanced punishments are NOT usual because they are very unusual in
that this ***** unconstitutional legislation is unusual; and since they
are cruel in nature, that means they are nothing but cruel and unusual
punishments.
characterized by excess: excessive charges; excessive criticism.
Yet, you fail to recognize that enhancements do create excess in the area
of punishment.
Because it's not true, liar Wentzky.
Wrong, propagandaist liar.
I await to see homosexuals prosecuted via this legislation after they commit
a hate crime against anyone not of their sexual orientation or even anyone
who says they are homosexual that another homosexual commits a crime of
violence against.
LOL!
HAHHAHAHAH!
To raise to a higher degree does not, by necessity equate to going
beyond the proper degree.
In the case of punishments, you are in error.
No liar Wentzky, I am 100% correct.
You are in error, and I fully expect to see homosexuals prosecuted via this
hate crime legislation.
You are showing your favor for punishing persons ecessively and without
merit.
No, I am logically disassembling your spurious arguments.
You are unconstitutionally failing to dismantle any of my lawful writings.
As can plainly be seen, these words have different meaning.
As can be seen, you do not show me anything other than an allegiance to
that which will not allow you to attain forgiveness if you slip.
Blah, blah, blah.
HAH HAH HAH!
Do you have anything of value to add, you're starting to bore me.
I like boring propagandist anti-constitution loons such as yourself.
They are not interchangeable terms.
The term enhanced is being used in an unconstitutional manner.
*****. The only one of the two terms mentioned at all in the
Constitution in this context is excessive. Enhanced does not necessarily
equate to excessive. They are not interchangeable terms.
Propaganda.
Is it an atheistic tendency to wish such punishments upon people that
violate the constitutional prohibitions?
They don't, liar Wentzky.
Oh.
You wish such punishments upon people that DON'T violated the constiutional
prohibitions.
Good thing you clarified your atheistic treason agenda.
Enhanced penalties are not unconstitutional.
*****.
No, I am 100% correct.
You are more wrong than you have been yet.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Smiler" |
|
| Title: Re: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Under the Law |
07 Nov 2007 09:30:12 PM |
|
|
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:rZqYi.29130$N7.20269@bignews7.bellsouth.net...
"Scruffy McScruffovitch" <Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote in message
news:SCpYi.19109$lD6.10655@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:%2pYi.18087$a9.11266@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
Enhanced, raised higher,
But the Constitution does not mention Enhanced, only Excessive.
That's why you homosexual perverts decided to pick the word enhanced,
thinking it would deceive people into believing your propaganda.
punishments are excessive punisments.
Not according to the Constitution.
The Constitution doesn't tell you that.
The 'enhanced' punishment for murder over manslaugther is unconstitutional?
The difference between manslaughter and murder is the intention of the
killer.
The difference between an ordinary crime and a hate crime is the intention
of the criminal.
Where's the difference?
Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Scruffy McScruffovitch" |
|
| Title: Re: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Under the Law |
07 Nov 2007 07:39:17 PM |
|
|
In News rZqYi.29130$N7.20269@bignews7.bellsouth.net,, John D. Wentzky at
wxpprofessional@msn.com, typed this:
"Scruffy McScruffovitch" <Scruffy_1@FAM.NET> wrote in message
news:SCpYi.19109$lD6.10655@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:%2pYi.18087$a9.11266@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
Enhanced, raised higher,
But the Constitution does not mention Enhanced, only Excessive.
That's why you homosexual perverts
Not being homosexual or perverted, I consider your statement irrelevant.
decided to pick the word enhanced,
thinking it would deceive people into believing your propaganda.
Words have meanings. There is no deception. The penalties for hate crimes
are enhanced penalties, not excessive penalties.
punishments are excessive punisments.
Not according to the Constitution.
The Constitution doesn't tell you that.
The Constitution doesn't tell anyone that.
ex搾es新ive
going beyond the usual, necessary, or proper limit or degree;
Yes, and the meanings of enhanced show you the reason that enhanced
punishments are also deemd cruel and unusual.
Nothing in the Constitution discusses enhanced punishments, nor
defines them, only excessive. Nothing in the Constitution has
deemed enhanced punishments to be either cruel, or unusual.
*****.
No, that is 100% correct.
The Constitution itself forbids cruel and unusual punihsment.
But does not define enhanced punishments as either cruel, or unusual.
Since enhanced punishments are NOT usual
They are usual for hate crimes.
because they are very
unusual in that this ***** unconstitutional legislation is
unusual; and since they are cruel in nature, that means they are
nothing but cruel and unusual punishments.
There is nothing in the Constitution that defines hate crime, or it's
punishments, as either cruel, or unusual.
characterized by excess: excessive charges; excessive criticism.
Yet, you fail to recognize that enhancements do create excess in
the area of punishment.
Because it's not true, liar Wentzky.
Wrong,
No, I am 100% correct.
[snip child like tantrum]
To raise to a higher degree does not, by necessity equate to going
beyond the proper degree.
In the case of punishments, you are in error.
No liar Wentzky, I am 100% correct.
You are in error,
No liar Wentzky, I am 100% correct.
You are showing your favor for punishing persons ecessively and
without merit.
No, I am logically disassembling your spurious arguments.
You are unconstitutionally
No liar Wentzky, everything I have stated is fully Constutional.
As can plainly be seen, these words have different meaning.
As can be seen, you do not show me anything other than an
allegiance to that which will not allow you to attain forgiveness
if you slip.
Blah, blah, blah.
HAH HAH HAH!
Do you have anything of value to add, you're starting to bore me.
I like boring propagandist
Then you must bore yourself to tears on a regular basis.
They are not interchangeable terms.
The term enhanced is being used in an unconstitutional manner.
*****. The only one of the two terms mentioned at all in the
Constitution in this context is excessive. Enhanced does not
necessarily equate to excessive. They are not interchangeable terms.
Propaganda.
No, 100% truth, liar Wentzky.
Is it an atheistic tendency to wish such punishments upon people
that violate the constitutional prohibitions?
They don't, liar Wentzky.
Oh.
You wish such punishments upon people that DON'T violated the
constiutional prohibitions.
What are you babbling about, liar Wentzky?
Good thing you clarified your atheistic treason agenda.
When you're done losing your mind, let me know.
Enhanced penalties are not unconstitutional.
*****.
No, I am 100% correct.
You are more wrong
No, I am 100% correct.
--
"A government big enough to give you everything you want is strong
enough to take away everything you have."
Thomas Jefferson
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lars Eighner" |
|
| Title: Re: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Under the Law |
06 Nov 2007 01:51:01 PM |
|
|
In our last episode, <Vr3Yi.67120$c9.51298@bignews8.bellsouth.net>, the
lovely and talented John D. Wentzky broadcast on alt.atheism:
"Lars Eighner" <usenet@larseighner.com> wrote in message
news:slrnfj1d9u.2tjs.usenet@debranded.larseighner.com...
In our last episode, <WK%Xi.17250$a9.4734@bignews5.bellsouth.net>, the
lovely and talented John D. Wentzky broadcast on tx.politics:
"J Young" <younginsights@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1194304709.184721.246140@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=PR07I05&f=WX06L03
FRC to Congress: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal
Justice Under the Law
Enhanced punishments are unconstitutional.
Of course they are not.
Ridiculous.
There are constitutitional prohibitions against excessive fines and
excessive punishments and against cruel and unusual punishment.
You are not understanding the requirements of the Constitution that do not
allow enhanced punishments to be used against any person via any sort of
hate crime legislation.
Hate crimes legislation has been upheld *unanimously* by the US Supreme
Court. It wasn't even close. It was not a narrow "liberal" majority.
It was every single justice.
The mens rea -- criminal intent -- has been the basis of Western law since
time immemorial. The basis of law will not be overturned just to suit your
bigotry.
--
Lars Eighner <http://larseighner.com/> <http://myspace.com/larseighner>
Countdown: 440 days to go.
What do you do when you're debranded?
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Under the Law |
06 Nov 2007 01:54:48 PM |
|
|
"Lars Eighner" <usenet@larseighner.com> wrote in message
news:slrnfj1hae.2tjs.usenet@debranded.larseighner.com...
In our last episode, <Vr3Yi.67120$c9.51298@bignews8.bellsouth.net>, the
lovely and talented John D. Wentzky broadcast on alt.atheism:
"Lars Eighner" <usenet@larseighner.com> wrote in message
news:slrnfj1d9u.2tjs.usenet@debranded.larseighner.com...
In our last episode, <WK%Xi.17250$a9.4734@bignews5.bellsouth.net>, the
lovely and talented John D. Wentzky broadcast on tx.politics:
"J Young" <younginsights@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1194304709.184721.246140@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=PR07I05&f=WX06L03
FRC to Congress: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal
Justice Under the Law
Enhanced punishments are unconstitutional.
Of course they are not.
Ridiculous.
There are constitutitional prohibitions against excessive fines and
excessive punishments and against cruel and unusual punishment.
You are not understanding the requirements of the Constitution that do
not
allow enhanced punishments to be used against any person via any sort of
hate crime legislation.
Hate crimes legislation has been upheld *unanimously* by the US Supreme
Court. It wasn't even close. It was not a narrow "liberal" majority.
It was every single justice.
The mens rea -- criminal intent -- has been the basis of Western law since
time immemorial. The basis of law will not be overturned just to suit
your
bigotry.
I'm not a bigot you wimpy paranoid unconstitutional bigoted idiot.
Why do you need the government to come to your aid so much?
Isn't it because you lost your ability to protect yourself after you
subjected yourself to the consternation of the people you caused harm to?
When will you stop acting like a guilty criminal coward and start learning
how to behave yourself and how to pay for your past crimes?
LOSER!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wimp!
COWARD!
Spreading HIV and other diseases are supposed to be constitutional rights of
yours now?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Scruffy McScruffovitch" |
|
| Title: Re: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Under the Law |
06 Nov 2007 02:57:06 PM |
|
|
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote in message
news:cE3Yi.67127$c9.38933@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
"Lars Eighner" <usenet@larseighner.com> wrote in message
news:slrnfj1hae.2tjs.usenet@debranded.larseighner.com...
In our last episode, <Vr3Yi.67120$c9.51298@bignews8.bellsouth.net>, the
lovely and talented John D. Wentzky broadcast on alt.atheism:
"Lars Eighner" <usenet@larseighner.com> wrote in message
news:slrnfj1d9u.2tjs.usenet@debranded.larseighner.com...
In our last episode, <WK%Xi.17250$a9.4734@bignews5.bellsouth.net>, the
lovely and talented John D. Wentzky broadcast on tx.politics:
"J Young" <younginsights@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1194304709.184721.246140@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=PR07I05&f=WX06L03
FRC to Congress: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal
Justice Under the Law
Enhanced punishments are unconstitutional.
Of course they are not.
Ridiculous.
There are constitutitional prohibitions against excessive fines and
excessive punishments and against cruel and unusual punishment.
You are not understanding the requirements of the Constitution that do
not
allow enhanced punishments to be used against any person via any sort of
hate crime legislation.
Hate crimes legislation has been upheld *unanimously* by the US Supreme
Court. It wasn't even close. It was not a narrow "liberal" majority.
It was every single justice.
The mens rea -- criminal intent -- has been the basis of Western law
since
time immemorial. The basis of law will not be overturned just to suit
your
bigotry.
I'm not a bigot
Yes, you are.
[remainder of tirade snipped]
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lars Eighner" |
|
| Title: Re: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Under the Law |
06 Nov 2007 03:02:45 PM |
|
|
In our last episode,
<cE3Yi.67127$c9.38933@bignews8.bellsouth.net>,
the lovely and talented John D. Wentzky
broadcast on tx.politics:
"Lars Eighner" <usenet@larseighner.com> wrote in message
news:slrnfj1hae.2tjs.usenet@debranded.larseighner.com...
Hate crimes legislation has been upheld *unanimously* by the US Supreme
Court. It wasn't even close. It was not a narrow "liberal" majority.
It was every single justice.
The mens rea -- criminal intent -- has been the basis of Western law since
time immemorial. The basis of law will not be overturned just to suit
your
bigotry.
I'm not a bigot you wimpy paranoid unconstitutional bigoted idiot.
In articulate rage coming from you is not so surprising, but it proves the
point that you are a bigot. Fortunately, you do not get to say what is
constitional.
Here is the unanimous decision of those who do get to say what is
constitutional:
<http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=508&invol=476">
WISCONSIN v. MITCHELL, 508 U.S. 476 (1993)
Hate crimes legislation does not violate the Constitution.
Why do you need the government to come to your aid so much?
Hate crimes legislation protects everyone.
Isn't it because you lost your ability to protect yourself after you
subjected yourself to the consternation of the people you caused harm to?
Who would that be?
When will you stop acting like a guilty criminal coward and start learning
how to behave yourself and how to pay for your past crimes?
What crimes would those be, John?
LOSER!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wimp!
COWARD!
Such telling arguments.
Spreading HIV and other diseases are supposed to be constitutional rights
of yours now?
If you are so worried about HIV, why don't you get to know people before you
have sex with them? Or is it that the more people get to know you, the less
likely they are to have sex with you?
--
Lars Eighner <http://larseighner.com/> <http://myspace.com/larseighner>
Countdown: 440 days to go.
What do you do when you're debranded?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lars Eighner" |
|
| Title: Re: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Under the Law |
06 Nov 2007 03:13:44 PM |
|
|
In our last episode,
<cE3Yi.67127$c9.38933@bignews8.bellsouth.net>,
the lovely and talented John D. Wentzky
broadcast on tx.politics:
"Lars Eighner" <usenet@larseighner.com> wrote in message
news:slrnfj1hae.2tjs.usenet@debranded.larseighner.com...
Hate crimes legislation has been upheld *unanimously* by the US Supreme
Court. It wasn't even close. It was not a narrow "liberal" majority.
It was every single justice.
The mens rea -- criminal intent -- has been the basis of Western law since
time immemorial. The basis of law will not be overturned just to suit
your
bigotry.
I'm not a bigot you wimpy paranoid unconstitutional bigoted idiot.
Inarticulate rage coming from you is not so surprising, but it proves the
point that you are a bigot. Fortunately, you do not get to say what is
constitional.
Here is the unanimous decision of those who do get to say what is
constitutional:
<http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=508&invol=476">
WISCONSIN v. MITCHELL, 508 U.S. 476 (1993)
Hate crimes legislation does not violate the Constitution.
Why do you need the government to come to your aid so much?
Hate crimes legislation protects everyone.
Isn't it because you lost your ability to protect yourself after you
subjected yourself to the consternation of the people you caused harm to?
Who would that be?
When will you stop acting like a guilty criminal coward and start learning
how to behave yourself and how to pay for your past crimes?
What crimes would those be, John?
LOSER!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wimp!
COWARD!
Such telling arguments.
Spreading HIV and other diseases are supposed to be constitutional rights
of yours now?
If you are so worried about HIV, why don't you get to know people before you
have sex with them? Or is it that the more people get to know you, the less
likely they are to have sex with you?
--
Lars Eighner <http://larseighner.com/> <http://myspace.com/larseighner>
Countdown: 440 days to go.
What do you do when you're debranded?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Under the Law |
06 Nov 2007 07:37:19 PM |
|
|
One fine day in alt.atheism, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
bloodied us up with this:
"Lars Eighner" <usenet@larseighner.com> wrote in message
news:slrnfj1hae.2tjs.usenet@debranded.larseighner.com...
In our last episode, <Vr3Yi.67120$c9.51298@bignews8.bellsouth.net>,
the lovely and talented John D. Wentzky broadcast on alt.atheism:
"Lars Eighner" <usenet@larseighner.com> wrote in message
news:slrnfj1d9u.2tjs.usenet@debranded.larseighner.com...
In our last episode, <WK%Xi.17250$a9.4734@bignews5.bellsouth.net>,
the lovely and talented John D. Wentzky broadcast on tx.politics:
"J Young" <younginsights@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1194304709.184721.246140@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=PR07I05&f=WX06L03
FRC to Congress: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect
Equal Justice Under the Law
Enhanced punishments are unconstitutional.
Of course they are not.
Ridiculous.
There are constitutitional prohibitions against excessive fines and
excessive punishments and against cruel and unusual punishment.
You are not understanding the requirements of the Constitution that
do not
allow enhanced punishments to be used against any person via any
sort of hate crime legislation.
Hate crimes legislation has been upheld *unanimously* by the US
Supreme Court. It wasn't even close. It was not a narrow "liberal"
majority. It was every single justice.
The mens rea -- criminal intent -- has been the basis of Western law
since time immemorial. The basis of law will not be overturned just
to suit your
bigotry.
I'm not a bigot you wimpy paranoid unconstitutional bigoted idiot.
Why do you need the government to come to your aid so much?
Isn't it because you lost your ability to protect yourself after you
subjected yourself to the consternation of the people you caused harm
to? When will you stop acting like a guilty criminal coward and start
learning how to behave yourself and how to pay for your past crimes?
LOSER!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wimp!
COWARD!
Spreading HIV and other diseases are supposed to be constitutional
rights of yours now?
Meltdown! Somebody make some popcorn!
--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department.
Convicted by Earthquack.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "=?iso-8859-1?q?bobandcarole=AE?=" |
|
| Title: Re: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Under the Law |
07 Nov 2007 10:43:26 AM |
|
|
On Nov 6, 1:42?pm, Lars Eighner <use...@larseighner.com> wrote:
In our last episode, <WK%Xi.17250$a9.4...@bignews5.bellsouth.net>, the
lovely and talented John D. Wentzky broadcast on tx.politics:
"J Young" <younginsig...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1194304709.184721.246140@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=PR07I05&f=WX06L03
FRC to Congress: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal
Justice Under the Law
Enhanced punishments are unconstitutional.
Of course they are not.
--
Lars Eighner <http://larseighner.com/> <http://myspace.com/larseighner>
Countdown: 440 days to go.
What do you do when you're debranded?
sniper or 'cap gun' as he is known in APH is a lying little Canadian
piece of ***** that posted a whopper of a lie that he will never live
down.
"You will find that out this summer when I arrive on your door step
Blob, People at AOL are quite helpful" --Sniper. 308, Jerry Lewis
poster boy in training goes postal and demonstrates his utter
frustration and psychotic tendencies after getting another usenet
japslap from Bob..
http://tinyurl.com/2c2sgw
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dionisio" |
|
| Title: Re: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Underthe Law |
06 Nov 2007 04:35:35 PM |
|
|
John D. Wentzky wrote:
Enhanced punishments are unconstitutional.
Ah, back from your little vacation?
--
And the Thought of the Moment (TM) is:
The first mistake in dealing with the Christian Right has been to allow its definition of
the issues to go unquestioned. While the movement's reasoning is faulty, its use of
rhetoric is flawless.
-- Kenneth Chafin, Oct 2, 1994 - former pastor of Walnut Street Baptist Church in
Louisville and former professor of evangelism and preaching at Southern Baptist
Theological Seminary.
(Brought to you by SigChanger. http://www.phranc.nl)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "JohnN" |
|
| Title: Re: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Under the Law |
06 Nov 2007 03:56:03 PM |
|
|
On Nov 6, 10:28 am, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:
"J Young" <younginsig...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1194304709.184721.246140@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=PR07I05&f=WX06L03
FRC to Congress: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal
Justice Under the Law
Enhanced punishments are unconstitutional.
One violent act can violate more than one law and legal jurisdiction.
Each violation is a crime and is prosecuted as such. There is no
enhancement if a violent crime is prosecuted as both battery and a
hate crime.
JohnN
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Under the Law |
06 Nov 2007 09:31:17 PM |
|
|
"JohnN" <jnorris53@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1194386163.954098.325640@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 6, 10:28 am, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:
"J Young" <younginsig...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1194304709.184721.246140@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=PR07I05&f=WX06L03
FRC to Congress: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal
Justice Under the Law
Enhanced punishments are unconstitutional.
One violent act can violate more than one law and legal jurisdiction.
Each violation is a crime and is prosecuted as such. There is no
enhancement if a violent crime is prosecuted as both battery and a
hate crime.
Your gay pride lingo is failing you.
Enhanced = extra, excessive, additional, augmented.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Under the Law |
07 Nov 2007 12:16:15 AM |
|
|
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"JohnN" <jnorris53@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1194386163.954098.325640@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 6, 10:28 am, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:
"J Young" <younginsig...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1194304709.184721.246140@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=PR07I05&f=WX06L03
FRC to Congress: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal
Justice Under the Law
Enhanced punishments are unconstitutional.
One violent act can violate more than one law and legal jurisdiction.
Each violation is a crime and is prosecuted as such. There is no
enhancement if a violent crime is prosecuted as both battery and a
hate crime.
Your gay pride lingo is failing you.
Enhanced = extra, excessive, additional, augmented.
Not at all...and since you're posting that repeatedly, congratulations.
You're apparently the first American case of avian flu.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2007-08 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Houston 2, Lake Erie 1 (SO) (November 4)
NEXT GAME: Thursday, November 8 at Milwaukee, 7:05
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Under the Law |
07 Nov 2007 02:41:39 PM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkir4eh974.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"JohnN" <jnorris53@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1194386163.954098.325640@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 6, 10:28 am, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:
"J Young" <younginsig...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1194304709.184721.246140@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=PR07I05&f=WX06L03
FRC to Congress: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal
Justice Under the Law
Enhanced punishments are unconstitutional.
One violent act can violate more than one law and legal jurisdiction.
Each violation is a crime and is prosecuted as such. There is no
enhancement if a violent crime is prosecuted as both battery and a
hate crime.
Your gay pride lingo is failing you.
Enhanced = extra, excessive, additional, augmented.
Not at all...
Wrong, ignorant bias charlatan.
and since you're posting that repeatedly, congratulations.
It bears repeating.
You're apparently the first American case of avian flu.
You mean you forgot about rats and the bubonic plague?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Under the Law |
07 Nov 2007 05:26:52 PM |
|
|
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkir4eh974.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"JohnN" <jnorris53@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1194386163.954098.325640@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 6, 10:28 am, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:
"J Young" <younginsig...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1194304709.184721.246140@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=PR07I05&f=WX06L03
FRC to Congress: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal
Justice Under the Law
Enhanced punishments are unconstitutional.
One violent act can violate more than one law and legal jurisdiction.
Each violation is a crime and is prosecuted as such. There is no
enhancement if a violent crime is prosecuted as both battery and a
hate crime.
Your gay pride lingo is failing you.
Enhanced = extra, excessive, additional, augmented.
Not at all...
Wrong, ignorant bias charlatan.
You still can't (and apparently never will) understand what you read, unless
it's convenient to your purposes.
and since you're posting that repeatedly, congratulations.
It bears repeating.
Repeat it enough, and as far as Usenet is concerned, it's spam.
You're apparently the first American case of avian flu.
You mean you forgot about rats and the bubonic plague?
Why do you act like you want to be visited by both?
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2007-08 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Houston 2, Lake Erie 1 (SO) (November 4)
NEXT GAME: Thursday, November 8 at Milwaukee, 7:05
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Under the Law |
07 Nov 2007 05:30:47 PM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkwsstwsar.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkir4eh974.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"JohnN" <jnorris53@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1194386163.954098.325640@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 6, 10:28 am, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:
"J Young" <younginsig...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1194304709.184721.246140@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=PR07I05&f=WX06L03
FRC to Congress: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal
Justice Under the Law
Enhanced punishments are unconstitutional.
One violent act can violate more than one law and legal jurisdiction.
Each violation is a crime and is prosecuted as such. There is no
enhancement if a violent crime is prosecuted as both battery and a
hate crime.
Your gay pride lingo is failing you.
Enhanced = extra, excessive, additional, augmented.
Not at all...
Wrong, ignorant bias charlatan.
You still can't (and apparently never will) understand what you read,
unless
it's convenient to your purposes.
and since you're posting that repeatedly, congratulations.
It bears repeating.
Repeat it enough, and as far as Usenet is concerned, it's spam.
Wrong, anti-law intolerant hypocritical idiot.
You're apparently the first American case of avian flu.
You mean you forgot about rats and the bubonic plague?
Why do you act like you want to be visited by both?
I don't, fool.
I am not in SF ramming rats up my ***** that had fetus brains injected
into them.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Under the Law |
08 Nov 2007 01:31:54 AM |
|
|
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkwsstwsar.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkir4eh974.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"JohnN" <jnorris53@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1194386163.954098.325640@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 6, 10:28 am, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:
"J Young" <younginsig...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1194304709.184721.246140@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=PR07I05&f=WX06L03
FRC to Congress: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal
Justice Under the Law
Enhanced punishments are unconstitutional.
One violent act can violate more than one law and legal jurisdiction.
Each violation is a crime and is prosecuted as such. There is no
enhancement if a violent crime is prosecuted as both battery and a
hate crime.
Your gay pride lingo is failing you. Enhanced = extra, excessive,
additional, augmented.
Not at all...
Wrong, ignorant bias charlatan.
You still can't (and apparently never will) understand what you read,
unless it's convenient to your purposes.
and since you're posting that repeatedly, congratulations.
It bears repeating.
Repeat it enough, and as far as Usenet is concerned, it's spam.
Wrong, anti-law intolerant hypocritical idiot.
Take it up with the news servers who will apply their rules.
You're apparently the first American case of avian flu.
You mean you forgot about rats and the bubonic plague?
Why do you act like you want to be visited by both?
I don't, fool. I am not in SF ramming rats up my ***** that had fetus
brains injected into them.
You're in Anderson, SC begging for a permanent home in the state hospital.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2007-08 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Houston 2, Lake Erie 1 (SO) (November 4)
NEXT GAME: Thursday, November 8 at Milwaukee, 7:05
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Under the Law |
08 Nov 2007 10:46:53 AM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkprylp505.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkwsstwsar.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkir4eh974.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"JohnN" <jnorris53@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1194386163.954098.325640@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 6, 10:28 am, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com>
wrote:
"J Young" <younginsig...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1194304709.184721.246140@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=PR07I05&f=WX06L03
FRC to Congress: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect
Equal
Justice Under the Law
Enhanced punishments are unconstitutional.
One violent act can violate more than one law and legal
jurisdiction.
Each violation is a crime and is prosecuted as such. There is no
enhancement if a violent crime is prosecuted as both battery and a
hate crime.
Your gay pride lingo is failing you. Enhanced = extra, excessive,
additional, augmented.
Not at all...
Wrong, ignorant bias charlatan.
You still can't (and apparently never will) understand what you read,
unless it's convenient to your purposes.
and since you're posting that repeatedly, congratulations.
It bears repeating.
Repeat it enough, and as far as Usenet is concerned, it's spam.
Wrong, anti-law intolerant hypocritical idiot.
Take it up with the news servers who will apply their rules.
It isn't spam, you fraud.
You're apparently the first American case of avian flu.
You mean you forgot about rats and the bubonic plague?
Why do you act like you want to be visited by both?
I don't, fool. I am not in SF ramming rats up my ***** that had fetus
brains injected into them.
You're in Anderson, SC begging for a permanent home in the state hospital.
Another lie, you fraud.
You are allegedly, alleged by yourself, in texas, lying like the fraud you
are.
Your words are not indicative of truth.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php
Did someone say something about SPAM?
FOOL!
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Under the Law |
08 Nov 2007 04:12:40 PM |
|
|
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkprylp505.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkwsstwsar.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkir4eh974.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:
"JohnN" <jnorris53@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1194386163.954098.325640@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 6, 10:28 am, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com>
wrote:
"J Young" <younginsig...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1194304709.184721.246140@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=PR07I05&f=WX06L03
FRC to Congress: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect
Equal Justice Under the Law
Enhanced punishments are unconstitutional.
One violent act can violate more than one law and legal
jurisdiction. Each violation is a crime and is prosecuted as such.
There is no enhancement if a violent crime is prosecuted as both
battery and a hate crime.
Your gay pride lingo is failing you. Enhanced = extra, excessive,
additional, augmented.
Not at all...
Wrong, ignorant bias charlatan.
You still can't (and apparently never will) understand what you read,
unless it's convenient to your purposes.
and since you're posting that repeatedly, congratulations.
It bears repeating.
Repeat it enough, and as far as Usenet is concerned, it's spam.
Wrong, anti-law intolerant hypocritical idiot.
Take it up with the news servers who will apply their rules.
It isn't spam, you fraud.
You don't decide if it's spam or not. If you post your crap often enough,
news servers will decide to filter you out. That's reality.
You're apparently the first American case of avian flu.
You mean you forgot about rats and the bubonic plague?
Why do you act like you want to be visited by both?
I don't, fool. I am not in SF ramming rats up my ***** that had fetus
brains injected into them.
You're in Anderson, SC begging for a permanent home in the state hospital.
Another lie, you fraud.
You are allegedly, alleged by yourself, in texas, lying like the fraud you
are.
I'm right here in Texas, PsychoDrunk Wentzky. (No, you won't be calling any
number that reaches where Dale and I live.)
Your words are not indicative of truth.
Your words are indicative of a forthcoming meltdown of what used to be you.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2007-08 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Houston 2, Lake Erie 1 (SO) (November 4)
NEXT GAME: Thursday, November 8 at Milwaukee, 7:05
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: All Violent Crimes are Hate Crimes, Protect Equal Justice Under the Law |
08 Nov 2007 04:23:21 PM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkpryk1j53.fsf@eris.io.com...
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php
"You don't decide if it's spam or not. If you post your crap often enough,
news servers will decide to filter you out. That's reality."
PLH on himself.
LOL!
HAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
