| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Dave DeWolfe" |
| Date: |
17 Jun 2004 04:39:04 AM |
| Object: |
America: Founded on Christian Values?? |
Evangelicals and Fundamentalists are quick to point out that America
was "founded on Christian values and principals."
It seems that you Bible thumping holy rollers have forgotten that it
was legal to OWN a slave in America from 1787 when the Constitution
was signed until 1865 when the 13th Amendment was ratified which
banned slavery.
Yes, these so-called "Christian" founders of our country apparently
considered people of "color" to be less than human.
Also, nowhere in the Constitution or the Declaration of Independence,
can you find a reference to "Christ" or "Christianity".
Dave
.
|
|
| User: "John Norris" |
|
| Title: Re: America: Founded on Christian Values?? |
17 Jun 2004 09:10:24 AM |
|
|
(Dave DeWolfe) wrote in message news:<51e38557.0406170139.1fe3489b@posting.google.com>...
Evangelicals and Fundamentalists are quick to point out that America
was "founded on Christian values and principals."
It seems that you Bible thumping holy rollers have forgotten that it
was legal to OWN a slave in America from 1787 when the Constitution
was signed until 1865 when the 13th Amendment was ratified which
banned slavery.
Yes, these so-called "Christian" founders of our country apparently
considered people of "color" to be less than human.
Also, nowhere in the Constitution or the Declaration of Independence,
can you find a reference to "Christ" or "Christianity".
Dave
Dave, DAve, Dave, you know better. Slavery is supported in both the
Old and New Testaments. Its Christian just like killing those who do
not believe in God the way you do is Christian; or which end of one's
the egg one opens.
JohnN
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brian Westley" |
|
| Title: Re: America: Founded on Christian Values?? |
17 Jun 2004 06:43:40 PM |
|
|
(John Norris) writes:
dave-dewolfe@sbcglobal.net (Dave DeWolfe) wrote in message news:<51e38557.0406170139.1fe3489b@posting.google.com>...
Evangelicals and Fundamentalists are quick to point out that America
was "founded on Christian values and principals."
It seems that you Bible thumping holy rollers have forgotten that it
was legal to OWN a slave in America from 1787 when the Constitution
was signed until 1865 when the 13th Amendment was ratified which
banned slavery.
Yes, these so-called "Christian" founders of our country apparently
considered people of "color" to be less than human.
Also, nowhere in the Constitution or the Declaration of Independence,
can you find a reference to "Christ" or "Christianity".
Dave
Dave, DAve, Dave, you know better. Slavery is supported in both the
Old and New Testaments. Its Christian just like killing those who do
not believe in God the way you do is Christian; or which end of one's
the egg one opens.
So, are you a big-endian or a little-endian?
---
Merlyn LeRoy
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dave DeWolfe" |
|
| Title: Re: America: Founded on Christian Values?? |
26 Jun 2004 10:53:01 PM |
|
|
(John Norris) wrote in message news:<d43864a.0406170610.37697667@posting.google.com>...
dave-dewolfe@sbcglobal.net (Dave DeWolfe) wrote in message news:<51e38557.0406170139.1fe3489b@posting.google.com>...
Evangelicals and Fundamentalists are quick to point out that America
was "founded on Christian values and principals."
It seems that you Bible thumping holy rollers have forgotten that it
was legal to OWN a slave in America from 1787 when the Constitution
was signed until 1865 when the 13th Amendment was ratified which
banned slavery.
Yes, these so-called "Christian" founders of our country apparently
considered people of "color" to be less than human.
Also, nowhere in the Constitution or the Declaration of Independence,
can you find a reference to "Christ" or "Christianity".
Dave
Dave, DAve, Dave, you know better. Slavery is supported in both the
Old and New Testaments. Its Christian just like killing those who do
not believe in God the way you do is Christian; or which end of one's
the egg one opens.
JohnN
I'm bustin a gut lafin' !!! Love your post!!!
Dave
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "SReeseMe" |
|
| Title: Re: America: Founded on Christian Values?? |
17 Jun 2004 06:30:13 AM |
|
|
Subject: America: Founded on Christian Values??
From: (Dave DeWolfe)
Date: 06/17/2004 5:39 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id: <51e38557.0406170139.1fe3489b@posting.google.com>
Evangelicals and Fundamentalists are quick to point out that America
was "founded on Christian values and principals."
Yes, according to the bible thumpers every one of our founding fathers were
born again, fundamentalist Christians. Of course this isn't true but they love
shouting it from the rooftops.
It seems that you Bible thumping holy rollers have forgotten that it
was legal to OWN a slave in America from 1787 when the Constitution
was signed until 1865 when the 13th Amendment was ratified which
banned slavery.
Their bible speaks of slavery in nothing but glowing terms. So what do you
expect from these folks?
Yes, these so-called "Christian" founders of our country apparently
considered people of "color" to be less than human.
Also, nowhere in the Constitution or the Declaration of Independence,
can you find a reference to "Christ" or "Christianity".
Yep, the words Jehovah, Yahweh, Jesus, Christian or Bible do not appear
anywhere in our founding documents. Then again neither does the word
democracy, but I degress
Dave
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: America: Founded on Christian Values?? |
18 Jun 2004 07:04:15 PM |
|
|
On 17 Jun 2004 11:30:13 GMT, (SReeseMe) wrote:
Subject: America: Founded on Christian Values??
From: (Dave DeWolfe)
Date: 06/17/2004 5:39 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id: <51e38557.0406170139.1fe3489b@posting.google.com>
Evangelicals and Fundamentalists are quick to point out that America
was "founded on Christian values and principals."
Yes, according to the bible thumpers every one of our founding fathers were
born again, fundamentalist Christians. Of course this isn't true but they love
shouting it from the rooftops.
It seems that you Bible thumping holy rollers have forgotten that it
was legal to OWN a slave in America from 1787 when the Constitution
was signed until 1865 when the 13th Amendment was ratified which
banned slavery.
Their bible speaks of slavery in nothing but glowing terms. So what do you
expect from these folks?
Yes, these so-called "Christian" founders of our country apparently
considered people of "color" to be less than human.
Also, nowhere in the Constitution or the Declaration of Independence,
can you find a reference to "Christ" or "Christianity".
Yep, the words Jehovah, Yahweh, Jesus, Christian or Bible do not appear
anywhere in our founding documents. Then again neither does the word
democracy, but I degress
Dave
The body of the Constitution *Does refer to religion but not in a way
the Bible Thumpers want us to read. I did a copy/paste:
__________________________________________________________________
Article. VI.
All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption
of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States
under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be
made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be
made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme
Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby,
any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary
notwithstanding.
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of
the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial
Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall
be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no
religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office
or public Trust under the United States.
__________________________________________________________________
See that last statement?
http://www.archives.gov/national_archives_experience/constitution_transcript.html
Also, consider the fact that despite the religious differences among
our founding fathers they deliberately left it out of the
Constitution, and reinforced it with the First Amendment.
So, even *they* kept their beliefs to themselves rather than hand them
over to the government.
I flunked history, but I think I remember hearing in class that
religion in government is one of the reasons the pilgrims ran away
from England to found America.
Only now, there's no place to flee to.
drift
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fear gan dia" |
|
| Title: Re: America: Founded on Christian Values?? |
17 Jun 2004 04:46:54 PM |
|
|
Verily verily I say unto you, it is written by (SReeseMe)
in <20040617073013.23846.00000130@mb-m28.aol.com>:
Subject: America: Founded on Christian Values??
From: (Dave DeWolfe)
Date: 06/17/2004 5:39 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id: <51e38557.0406170139.1fe3489b@posting.google.com>
Evangelicals and Fundamentalists are quick to point out that America
was "founded on Christian values and principals."
Yes, according to the bible thumpers every one of our founding fathers were
born again, fundamentalist Christians. Of course this isn't true but they love
shouting it from the rooftops.
Thus showing their ignorance and stupidity, since fundyism
in the current sense didn't even exist back then.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamentalist_Christianity#Brief_History_of_Christian_fundamentalism
--
The Very Irrev. Fear gan dia # http://goddamliberal.port5.com
"If Bush was a doctor he'd use the 'get well soon' card
to diagnose the illness." - Get Your War On
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: America: Founded on Christian Values?? |
18 Jun 2004 09:22:28 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 21:46:54 +0000 in episode
<40d2114e.001@dhblnnntlbbh.com> we saw our hero "Fear gan dia"
<tlxtdqhxqddxb@dhblnnntlbbh.com>:
Verily verily I say unto you, it is written by (SReeseMe)
in <20040617073013.23846.00000130@mb-m28.aol.com>:
Subject: America: Founded on Christian Values?? From:
dave-dewolfe@sbcglobal.net (Dave DeWolfe) Date: 06/17/2004 5:39 AM
Eastern Daylight Time Message-id:
<51e38557.0406170139.1fe3489b@posting.google.com>
Evangelicals and Fundamentalists are quick to point out that America
was "founded on Christian values and principals."
Yes, according to the bible thumpers every one of our founding fathers
were born again, fundamentalist Christians. Of course this isn't true
but they love shouting it from the rooftops.
Thus showing their ignorance and stupidity, since fundyism in the current
sense didn't even exist back then.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamentalist_Christianity#Brief_History_of_Christian_fundamentalism
<shudder>
I was raised Plymouth Brethren (open). My little sect can trace a line
right back to Darby. Who we can thank for such things as dispensationalism
and the fundie "rapture" idea:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Nelson_Darby
Of the bunch they mention, Darby is about as close as you get to *the
founder of the movement. His theology being the cornerstone of the beliefs
of the usual suspects (Falwell, LaHaye, et al).
It's just too bad those johnny-come-latelys dropped one of the major
themes. The *original movement was not interested in politics. The belief
was that all "human institutions" were corrupt and you were utterly
wasting your time trying to "reform" them. In fact, it was considered
quite the "liberal" idea to think you could effect change via politics.
And in that spirit, I used to consider Falwell (among others) to be...
....wait for it...
Not Real Fundamentalists...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"I think it's the worst kept secret in Washington.
That everybody - everybody I talk to in Washington
has known and fully knows what [the neo-conservative]
agenda was and what they were trying to do."
[Retired General Anthony Zinni]
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eris" |
|
| Title: Re: America: Founded on Christian Values?? |
17 Jun 2004 06:48:25 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 21:46:54 GMT, "Fear gan dia"
<tlxtdqhxqddxb@dhblnnntlbbh.com> wrote:
Thus showing their ignorance and stupidity, since fundyism
in the current sense didn't even exist back then.
Really, then who was on Jeffersons case? Calling him a dirty Atheist?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: America: Founded on Christian Values?? |
18 Jun 2004 09:37:44 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 19:48:25 -0400 in episode
<3db4d09hujkkt25v05fnsfugigdbppuhpd@4ax.com> we saw our hero Eris
<Vithant01@comcast.net>:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 21:46:54 GMT, "Fear gan dia"
<tlxtdqhxqddxb@dhblnnntlbbh.com> wrote:
Thus showing their ignorance and stupidity, since fundyism in the current
sense didn't even exist back then.
Really, then who was on Jeffersons case? Calling him a dirty Atheist?
Christians.
Christianity has been around a long time. Fundamentalism is a modern
movement within Christianity. It's actually a *minority in Christianity
even today.
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"I think it's the worst kept secret in Washington.
That everybody - everybody I talk to in Washington
has known and fully knows what [the neo-conservative]
agenda was and what they were trying to do."
[Retired General Anthony Zinni]
.
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: America: Founded on Christian Values?? |
18 Jun 2004 10:06:53 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 09:37:44 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<y@hoo.com-amikchi> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 19:48:25 -0400 in episode
<3db4d09hujkkt25v05fnsfugigdbppuhpd@4ax.com> we saw our hero Eris
<Vithant01@comcast.net>:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 21:46:54 GMT, "Fear gan dia"
<tlxtdqhxqddxb@dhblnnntlbbh.com> wrote:
Thus showing their ignorance and stupidity, since fundyism in the current
sense didn't even exist back then.
Really, then who was on Jeffersons case? Calling him a dirty Atheist?
Christians.
Christianity has been around a long time. Fundamentalism is a modern
movement within Christianity. It's actually a *minority in Christianity
even today.
But it's made my adopted ountry what would be an international joke if
it weren't so scary:
GEORGE W. BUSH: God told me to strike at al Qaida and I struck them,
and then he instructed me to strike at Saddam [Hussein], which I did,
and now I am determined to solve the problem in the Middle East. If
you [Palestinian Prime Minister Mahmoud Abbas] help me I will act, and
if not, the elections will come and I will have to focus on them.
.....quoted by Palestinian Prime Minister
Mahmoud Abbas, in Arnon Regular, "'Road Map Is a Life Saver for Us,'
PM Abbas Tells Hamas," HAARETZ, 25 June 2003,
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=310788&contrassID=2&subContrassID=1&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eris" |
|
| Title: Re: America: Founded on Christian Values?? |
18 Jun 2004 10:01:48 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 09:37:44 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<y@hoo.com-amikchi> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 19:48:25 -0400 in episode
<3db4d09hujkkt25v05fnsfugigdbppuhpd@4ax.com> we saw our hero Eris
<Vithant01@comcast.net>:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 21:46:54 GMT, "Fear gan dia"
<tlxtdqhxqddxb@dhblnnntlbbh.com> wrote:
Thus showing their ignorance and stupidity, since fundyism in the current
sense didn't even exist back then.
Really, then who was on Jeffersons case? Calling him a dirty Atheist?
Christians.
Christianity has been around a long time. Fundamentalism is a modern
movement within Christianity. It's actually a *minority in Christianity
even today.
Yup I was a fundy, had no choice, either go to the First Church of the
Nazarene or get beaten. I remeber in the fifties and sixties how the
fundies were mocked and ridiculed by everyone, or so it seemed. Looks
like Pat Robertson, Jimmy Swaggart, Jim and Tammy Baker ( Jim
graduated from my High School ) did one heck of a job.
Oh well the penduluum swings both ways, when do you think it will
swing back our way again?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: America: Founded on Christian Values?? |
18 Jun 2004 12:58:10 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 11:01:48 -0400 in episode
<vo06d0pme0al6bjg1d1ouq67ttu32ovipk@4ax.com> we saw our hero Eris
<vithant01@comcast.net>:
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 09:37:44 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo" <y@hoo.com-amikchi>
wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 19:48:25 -0400 in episode
<3db4d09hujkkt25v05fnsfugigdbppuhpd@4ax.com> we saw our hero Eris
<Vithant01@comcast.net>:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 21:46:54 GMT, "Fear gan dia"
<tlxtdqhxqddxb@dhblnnntlbbh.com> wrote:
Thus showing their ignorance and stupidity, since fundyism in the
current sense didn't even exist back then.
Really, then who was on Jeffersons case? Calling him a dirty Atheist?
Christians.
Christianity has been around a long time. Fundamentalism is a modern
movement within Christianity. It's actually a *minority in Christianity
even today.
Yup I was a fundy, had no choice, either go to the First Church of the
Nazarene or get beaten. I remeber in the fifties and sixties how the
fundies were mocked and ridiculed by everyone, or so it seemed. Looks like
Pat Robertson, Jimmy Swaggart, Jim and Tammy Baker ( Jim graduated from my
High School ) did one heck of a job.
Oh well the penduluum swings both ways, when do you think it will swing
back our way again?
Probably not.
I expect this period of history to be discussed in books with titles such
as "The Decline and Fall of the United States."
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"I think it's the worst kept secret in Washington.
That everybody - everybody I talk to in Washington
has known and fully knows what [the neo-conservative]
agenda was and what they were trying to do."
[Retired General Anthony Zinni]
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Edgar A Pearlstein" |
|
| Title: Re: America: Founded on Christian Values?? |
17 Jun 2004 08:49:26 AM |
|
|
Dave DeWolfe (dave-dewolfe@sbcglobal.net) wrote:
: Evangelicals and Fundamentalists are quick to point out that America
: was "founded on Christian values and principals."
:
: It seems that you Bible thumping holy rollers have forgotten that it
: was legal to OWN a slave in America from 1787 when the Constitution
: was signed until 1865 when the 13th Amendment was ratified which
: banned slavery.
:
: Yes, these so-called "Christian" founders of our country apparently
: considered people of "color" to be less than human.
:
: Also, nowhere in the Constitution or the Declaration of Independence,
: can you find a reference to "Christ" or "Christianity".
There's a lot more to be said:
Of the many foundations of our country, I was able to find two
which are supported in the Bible, and several which run contrary
to the Bible.
THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE. Although the Declaration isn't
really a legal document of the U.S.(since there wasn't any US until
1787), it is important historically and philosophically. It is a
document intended to justify revolution
against an established royal government. The Bible, however, says
"the powers that be are ordained of God" (Romans 13:1-7), and "For
kings, and for all that are in authority" (I Timothy 2:2), thus giving
rise to the idea of divine right of kings. I find no mention of
"consent of the governed" in the Bible, as the Declaration demands.
While the Declaration deplores taxation without representation, Jesus
says, regarding taxation, "Render therefore unto Caesar the things
which are Caesar's" (Matthew 22:21)
FREEDOM OF SPEECH. I don't find in the Bible any defense of freedom
of speech. On the contrary: "he that doubteth is damned" (Romans
14:23); "there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers...whose
mouths must be stopped.." (Titus, 1:10-11); and "These six things doth
the Lord hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him: ......and he
that soweth discord among brethren." (Proverbs 6:16-19). The last
passage could be construed as being against democracy, since anyone
who runs for office against an existing administration is sowing
discord.
RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE. This is embraced in both the original
Constitution (Article VI, paragraph 3) and in the First Amendment.
Yet in the Bible we have: "Thou shalt have no other gods before me"
(Exodus 20:3); "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live" (Exodus 22:18);
"He that sacrifice unto any god save the Lord only, he shall be
utterly destroyed" (Exodus 22:20); "He who is not with me is against
me" (Matthew 12:30, Luke 11:23); "he that blasphemeth the name of the
LORD, he shall surely be put to death, and all the congregation shall
certainly stone him" (Leviticus 24:16). [Such stoning was actually
carried out, in 1 Kings 21:13] Anyone proselytizing for another religion
is to be put to death, and if that person is a member of your family, you
are to strike the first blow to kill him or her (Deuteronomy 13:5-10).
The practice of "shunning" someone who disagrees with you on religious
matters is advised in 2 Thessalonians 3:14.
A REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT. Our Constitution demands this
(Article IV, Section 4). But I find nothing in the Bible to support
it. On the contrary, Romans 13:1-7 tells people to obey authority
because it is instituted by God. Also, 1 Peter 2:13 can be interpreted in
the same way.
"CORRUPTION OF THE BLOOD" is forbidden by the Constitution (Article
III, Section 3, paragraph 2). In the Bible, though: "Prepare slaughter
for his children for the iniquity of their fathers (Isaiah 14:21).
[However, the Bible does contradict itself on this: "... neither shall
the children be put to death for the fathers" (Deut 24:16)]. Also:
"visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third
and fourth generation" (Exodus 20:5, 34:7, Numbers 14:18, Deut. 5:9);
"His blood be on us, and on our children" (Matthew 27:25). Bastards
may not enter the temple, nor their descendants (Deut. 23:2). God
even killed a baby because of a sin by its father (2 Samuel 12:14).
Ahab escaped punishment for murder by making an elaborate apology, and
his descendants were punished instead (I Kings 21:29). The doctrine
of original sin is also against this part of the Constitution.
SLAVERY. This was an important social and economic foundation of our
country both before and after independence. It was an institution
condoned by the founders and recognized and defended by the original
Constitution (Article I, Section 2, paragraph 3; Article I, Section 9;
Article IV, Section 2, paragraph 3). Slavery is also condoned in both
the Old and New Testaments, but it is never condemned. On the contrary,
it is codified, and made an inherited condition:
Exodus 21:4ff gives rules for keeping slaves. Leviticus 25:44-46
says that heathen may be purchased as slaves, that their children
become slaves, and that they are inherited as property by the owner's
children forever. Other places that indicate that slavery is a
hereditary condition are: Genesis 9:25, Exodus 21:4, Corinthians
7:20. Deuteronomy 20:10-14 says that when you conquer a city, if it
surrenders then all people inside it become your slaves; but if it
doesn't surrender, then all males are to be killed and all women and
children "take unto thyself". Luke 12:47-8 shows that Jesus approves
of slavery, for he describes the conditions under which one should
give a severe beating to a slave. 1 Timothy 6:1-2 tells slaves to
honor their masters.
In the book of Philemon, Paul sends a runaway slave, Onesimus, back
to his former master. But this conflicts with the admonition in
Deuteronomy 23:15 "Thou shalt not deliver unto his master the servant
which has escaped..." So the Bible is on both sides of the 1857 Dred
Scott case!
TREATMENT OF THE INDIAN PEOPLE. Here is another place where one of
the foundations of our country is justified by the Bible. "Then ye
shall drive out all the inhabitants of the land from before you, and
destroy....And ye shall dispossess the inhabitants of the land, and
dwell therein.." (Numbers 33:52-53). This biblical injunction was
obeyed many times by Americans.
A NOTE ON THE TREATY OF TRIPOLI. This treaty with the Bey of Tripoli
was negotiated by the administration of President George Washington,
and finally signed and ratified during the administration of President
John Adams, in 1797. Article 11 of the English-language version says
"the United States is in no sense based on the Christian religion".
(There is a mystery about this, since Article 11 doesn't appear in the
Arabic version! It's a fair presumption, though, that the English
version is what was signed by President Adams and duly ratified by the
U. S. Senate. See Bevans: Treaties and Other International Agreements
of the United States of America, 1776-1989, volume 11 and David Humphreys:
Miscellaneous Works (1804).)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ron Baker, Pluralitas!" |
|
| Title: Re: America: Founded on Christian Values?? |
17 Jun 2004 09:37:37 AM |
|
|
"Edgar A Pearlstein" <epearlst@unlserve.unl.edu> wrote in message
news:cas7h6$bon$1@unlnews.unl.edu...
Dave DeWolfe (dave-dewolfe@sbcglobal.net) wrote:
: Evangelicals and Fundamentalists are quick to point out that America
: was "founded on Christian values and principals."
:
: It seems that you Bible thumping holy rollers have forgotten that it
: was legal to OWN a slave in America from 1787 when the Constitution
: was signed until 1865 when the 13th Amendment was ratified which
: banned slavery.
:
: Yes, these so-called "Christian" founders of our country apparently
: considered people of "color" to be less than human.
:
: Also, nowhere in the Constitution or the Declaration of Independence,
: can you find a reference to "Christ" or "Christianity".
There's a lot more to be said:
Of the many foundations of our country, I was able to find two
which are supported in the Bible, and several which run contrary
to the Bible.
THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE. Although the Declaration isn't
really a legal document of the U.S.(since there wasn't any US until
1787), it is important historically and philosophically. It is a
document intended to justify revolution
against an established royal government. The Bible, however, says
"the powers that be are ordained of God" (Romans 13:1-7), and "For
kings, and for all that are in authority" (I Timothy 2:2), thus giving
rise to the idea of divine right of kings. I find no mention of
"consent of the governed" in the Bible, as the Declaration demands.
While the Declaration deplores taxation without representation, Jesus
says, regarding taxation, "Render therefore unto Caesar the things
which are Caesar's" (Matthew 22:21)
FREEDOM OF SPEECH. I don't find in the Bible any defense of freedom
of speech. On the contrary: "he that doubteth is damned" (Romans
14:23); "there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers...whose
mouths must be stopped.." (Titus, 1:10-11); and "These six things doth
the Lord hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him: ......and he
that soweth discord among brethren." (Proverbs 6:16-19). The last
passage could be construed as being against democracy, since anyone
who runs for office against an existing administration is sowing
discord.
RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE. This is embraced in both the original
Constitution (Article VI, paragraph 3) and in the First Amendment.
Yet in the Bible we have: "Thou shalt have no other gods before me"
(Exodus 20:3); "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live" (Exodus 22:18);
"He that sacrifice unto any god save the Lord only, he shall be
utterly destroyed" (Exodus 22:20); "He who is not with me is against
me" (Matthew 12:30, Luke 11:23); "he that blasphemeth the name of the
LORD, he shall surely be put to death, and all the congregation shall
certainly stone him" (Leviticus 24:16). [Such stoning was actually
carried out, in 1 Kings 21:13] Anyone proselytizing for another religion
is to be put to death, and if that person is a member of your family, you
are to strike the first blow to kill him or her (Deuteronomy 13:5-10).
The practice of "shunning" someone who disagrees with you on religious
matters is advised in 2 Thessalonians 3:14.
A REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT. Our Constitution demands this
(Article IV, Section 4). But I find nothing in the Bible to support
it. On the contrary, Romans 13:1-7 tells people to obey authority
because it is instituted by God. Also, 1 Peter 2:13 can be interpreted in
the same way.
"CORRUPTION OF THE BLOOD" is forbidden by the Constitution (Article
III, Section 3, paragraph 2). In the Bible, though: "Prepare slaughter
for his children for the iniquity of their fathers (Isaiah 14:21).
[However, the Bible does contradict itself on this: "... neither shall
the children be put to death for the fathers" (Deut 24:16)]. Also:
"visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third
and fourth generation" (Exodus 20:5, 34:7, Numbers 14:18, Deut. 5:9);
"His blood be on us, and on our children" (Matthew 27:25). Bastards
may not enter the temple, nor their descendants (Deut. 23:2). God
even killed a baby because of a sin by its father (2 Samuel 12:14).
Ahab escaped punishment for murder by making an elaborate apology, and
his descendants were punished instead (I Kings 21:29). The doctrine
of original sin is also against this part of the Constitution.
SLAVERY. This was an important social and economic foundation of our
country both before and after independence. It was an institution
condoned by the founders and recognized and defended by the original
Constitution (Article I, Section 2, paragraph 3; Article I, Section 9;
Article IV, Section 2, paragraph 3). Slavery is also condoned in both
the Old and New Testaments, but it is never condemned. On the contrary,
it is codified, and made an inherited condition:
Exodus 21:4ff gives rules for keeping slaves. Leviticus 25:44-46
says that heathen may be purchased as slaves, that their children
become slaves, and that they are inherited as property by the owner's
children forever. Other places that indicate that slavery is a
hereditary condition are: Genesis 9:25, Exodus 21:4, Corinthians
7:20. Deuteronomy 20:10-14 says that when you conquer a city, if it
surrenders then all people inside it become your slaves; but if it
doesn't surrender, then all males are to be killed and all women and
children "take unto thyself". Luke 12:47-8 shows that Jesus approves
of slavery, for he describes the conditions under which one should
give a severe beating to a slave. 1 Timothy 6:1-2 tells slaves to
honor their masters.
In the book of Philemon, Paul sends a runaway slave, Onesimus, back
to his former master. But this conflicts with the admonition in
Deuteronomy 23:15 "Thou shalt not deliver unto his master the servant
which has escaped..." So the Bible is on both sides of the 1857 Dred
Scott case!
TREATMENT OF THE INDIAN PEOPLE. Here is another place where one of
the foundations of our country is justified by the Bible. "Then ye
shall drive out all the inhabitants of the land from before you, and
destroy....And ye shall dispossess the inhabitants of the land, and
dwell therein.." (Numbers 33:52-53). This biblical injunction was
obeyed many times by Americans.
A NOTE ON THE TREATY OF TRIPOLI. This treaty with the Bey of Tripoli
was negotiated by the administration of President George Washington,
and finally signed and ratified during the administration of President
John Adams, in 1797. Article 11 of the English-language version says
"the United States is in no sense based on the Christian religion".
(There is a mystery about this, since Article 11 doesn't appear in the
Arabic version! It's a fair presumption, though, that the English
version is what was signed by President Adams and duly ratified by the
U. S. Senate. See Bevans: Treaties and Other International Agreements
of the United States of America, 1776-1989, volume 11 and David Humphreys:
Miscellaneous Works (1804).)
Hey, those are some good points.
--
RB
AA#2187
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woden wodencharternet" |
|
| Title: Re: America: Founded on Christian Values?? |
17 Jun 2004 03:02:14 PM |
|
|
"Ron Baker, Pluralitas!" <jung@topway.net.cn> wrote in
news:R0iAc.4256$fd.2678@twister.socal.rr.com:
"Edgar A Pearlstein" <epearlst@unlserve.unl.edu> wrote in message
news:cas7h6$bon$1@unlnews.unl.edu...
Dave DeWolfe (dave-dewolfe@sbcglobal.net) wrote:
: Evangelicals and Fundamentalists are quick to point out that
: America was "founded on Christian values and principals."
:
: It seems that you Bible thumping holy rollers have forgotten that
: it was legal to OWN a slave in America from 1787 when the
: Constitution was signed until 1865 when the 13th Amendment was
: ratified which banned slavery.
:
: Yes, these so-called "Christian" founders of our country apparently
: considered people of "color" to be less than human.
:
: Also, nowhere in the Constitution or the Declaration of
: Independence, can you find a reference to "Christ" or
: "Christianity".
There's a lot more to be said:
Of the many foundations of our country, I was able to find two
which are supported in the Bible, and several which run contrary
to the Bible.
THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE. Although the Declaration isn't
really a legal document of the U.S.(since there wasn't any US until
1787), it is important historically and philosophically. It is a
document intended to justify revolution
against an established royal government. The Bible, however, says
"the powers that be are ordained of God" (Romans 13:1-7), and "For
kings, and for all that are in authority" (I Timothy 2:2), thus
giving rise to the idea of divine right of kings. I find no mention
of "consent of the governed" in the Bible, as the Declaration
demands. While the Declaration deplores taxation without
representation, Jesus says, regarding taxation, "Render therefore
unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's" (Matthew 22:21)
FREEDOM OF SPEECH. I don't find in the Bible any defense of
freedom
of speech. On the contrary: "he that doubteth is damned" (Romans
14:23); "there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers...whose
mouths must be stopped.." (Titus, 1:10-11); and "These six things
doth the Lord hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him: ......and
he that soweth discord among brethren." (Proverbs 6:16-19). The last
passage could be construed as being against democracy, since anyone
who runs for office against an existing administration is sowing
discord.
RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE. This is embraced in both the original
Constitution (Article VI, paragraph 3) and in the First Amendment.
Yet in the Bible we have: "Thou shalt have no other gods before me"
(Exodus 20:3); "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live" (Exodus
22:18); "He that sacrifice unto any god save the Lord only, he shall
be utterly destroyed" (Exodus 22:20); "He who is not with me is
against me" (Matthew 12:30, Luke 11:23); "he that blasphemeth the
name of the LORD, he shall surely be put to death, and all the
congregation shall certainly stone him" (Leviticus 24:16). [Such
stoning was actually carried out, in 1 Kings 21:13] Anyone
proselytizing for another religion is to be put to death, and if that
person is a member of your family, you are to strike the first blow
to kill him or her (Deuteronomy 13:5-10). The practice of "shunning"
someone who disagrees with you on religious matters is advised in 2
Thessalonians 3:14.
A REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT. Our Constitution demands this
(Article IV, Section 4). But I find nothing in the Bible to support
it. On the contrary, Romans 13:1-7 tells people to obey authority
because it is instituted by God. Also, 1 Peter 2:13 can be
interpreted in the same way.
"CORRUPTION OF THE BLOOD" is forbidden by the Constitution (Article
III, Section 3, paragraph 2). In the Bible, though: "Prepare
slaughter for his children for the iniquity of their fathers (Isaiah
14:21). [However, the Bible does contradict itself on this: "...
neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers" (Deut
24:16)]. Also: "visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the
children unto the third and fourth generation" (Exodus 20:5, 34:7,
Numbers 14:18, Deut. 5:9); "His blood be on us, and on our children"
(Matthew 27:25). Bastards may not enter the temple, nor their
descendants (Deut. 23:2). God even killed a baby because of a sin by
its father (2 Samuel 12:14). Ahab escaped punishment for murder by
making an elaborate apology, and his descendants were punished
instead (I Kings 21:29). The doctrine of original sin is also
against this part of the Constitution.
SLAVERY. This was an important social and economic foundation of
our
country both before and after independence. It was an institution
condoned by the founders and recognized and defended by the original
Constitution (Article I, Section 2, paragraph 3; Article I, Section
9; Article IV, Section 2, paragraph 3). Slavery is also condoned in
both the Old and New Testaments, but it is never condemned. On the
contrary, it is codified, and made an inherited condition:
Exodus 21:4ff gives rules for keeping slaves. Leviticus 25:44-46
says that heathen may be purchased as slaves, that their children
become slaves, and that they are inherited as property by the owner's
children forever. Other places that indicate that slavery is a
hereditary condition are: Genesis 9:25, Exodus 21:4, Corinthians
7:20. Deuteronomy 20:10-14 says that when you conquer a city, if it
surrenders then all people inside it become your slaves; but if it
doesn't surrender, then all males are to be killed and all women and
children "take unto thyself". Luke 12:47-8 shows that Jesus approves
of slavery, for he describes the conditions under which one should
give a severe beating to a slave. 1 Timothy 6:1-2 tells slaves to
honor their masters.
In the book of Philemon, Paul sends a runaway slave, Onesimus, back
to his former master. But this conflicts with the admonition in
Deuteronomy 23:15 "Thou shalt not deliver unto his master the servant
which has escaped..." So the Bible is on both sides of the 1857 Dred
Scott case!
TREATMENT OF THE INDIAN PEOPLE. Here is another place where one of
the foundations of our country is justified by the Bible. "Then ye
shall drive out all the inhabitants of the land from before you, and
destroy....And ye shall dispossess the inhabitants of the land, and
dwell therein.." (Numbers 33:52-53). This biblical injunction was
obeyed many times by Americans.
A NOTE ON THE TREATY OF TRIPOLI. This treaty with the Bey of
Tripoli
was negotiated by the administration of President George Washington,
and finally signed and ratified during the administration of
President John Adams, in 1797. Article 11 of the English-language
version says "the United States is in no sense based on the Christian
religion". (There is a mystery about this, since Article 11 doesn't
appear in the Arabic version! It's a fair presumption, though, that
the English version is what was signed by President Adams and duly
ratified by the U. S. Senate. See Bevans: Treaties and Other
International Agreements of the United States of America, 1776-1989,
volume 11 and David Humphreys: Miscellaneous Works (1804).)
Hey, those are some good points.
--
RB
AA#2187
Too bad the fundies who are trying to make this a xian nation won't read
them.
--
Woden
"religion is a socio-political system for controlling people's thoughts,
lives and actions based on ancient myths and superstitions, perpetrated
through generations of subtle yet pervasive brainwashing."
.
|
|
|
| User: "AngryJohn" |
|
| Title: Re: America: Founded on Christian Values?? |
18 Jun 2004 12:58:41 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 20:02:14 -0000, Woden <wodencharternet> wrote:
"Ron Baker, Pluralitas!" <jung@topway.net.cn> wrote in
news:R0iAc.4256$fd.2678@twister.socal.rr.com:
"Edgar A Pearlstein" <epearlst@unlserve.unl.edu> wrote in message
news:cas7h6$bon$1@unlnews.unl.edu...
Dave DeWolfe (dave-dewolfe@sbcglobal.net) wrote:
: Evangelicals and Fundamentalists are quick to point out that
: America was "founded on Christian values and principals."
:
: It seems that you Bible thumping holy rollers have forgotten that
: it was legal to OWN a slave in America from 1787 when the
: Constitution was signed until 1865 when the 13th Amendment was
: ratified which banned slavery.
:
: Yes, these so-called "Christian" founders of our country apparently
: considered people of "color" to be less than human.
:
: Also, nowhere in the Constitution or the Declaration of
: Independence, can you find a reference to "Christ" or
: "Christianity".
There's a lot more to be said:
Of the many foundations of our country, I was able to find two
which are supported in the Bible, and several which run contrary
to the Bible.
THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE. Although the Declaration isn't
really a legal document of the U.S.(since there wasn't any US until
1787), it is important historically and philosophically. It is a
document intended to justify revolution
against an established royal government. The Bible, however, says
"the powers that be are ordained of God" (Romans 13:1-7), and "For
kings, and for all that are in authority" (I Timothy 2:2), thus
giving rise to the idea of divine right of kings. I find no mention
of "consent of the governed" in the Bible, as the Declaration
demands. While the Declaration deplores taxation without
representation, Jesus says, regarding taxation, "Render therefore
unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's" (Matthew 22:21)
FREEDOM OF SPEECH. I don't find in the Bible any defense of
freedom
of speech. On the contrary: "he that doubteth is damned" (Romans
14:23); "there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers...whose
mouths must be stopped.." (Titus, 1:10-11); and "These six things
doth the Lord hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him: ......and
he that soweth discord among brethren." (Proverbs 6:16-19). The last
passage could be construed as being against democracy, since anyone
who runs for office against an existing administration is sowing
discord.
RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE. This is embraced in both the original
Constitution (Article VI, paragraph 3) and in the First Amendment.
Yet in the Bible we have: "Thou shalt have no other gods before me"
(Exodus 20:3); "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live" (Exodus
22:18); "He that sacrifice unto any god save the Lord only, he shall
be utterly destroyed" (Exodus 22:20); "He who is not with me is
against me" (Matthew 12:30, Luke 11:23); "he that blasphemeth the
name of the LORD, he shall surely be put to death, and all the
congregation shall certainly stone him" (Leviticus 24:16). [Such
stoning was actually carried out, in 1 Kings 21:13] Anyone
proselytizing for another religion is to be put to death, and if that
person is a member of your family, you are to strike the first blow
to kill him or her (Deuteronomy 13:5-10). The practice of "shunning"
someone who disagrees with you on religious matters is advised in 2
Thessalonians 3:14.
A REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT. Our Constitution demands this
(Article IV, Section 4). But I find nothing in the Bible to support
it. On the contrary, Romans 13:1-7 tells people to obey authority
because it is instituted by God. Also, 1 Peter 2:13 can be
interpreted in the same way.
"CORRUPTION OF THE BLOOD" is forbidden by the Constitution (Article
III, Section 3, paragraph 2). In the Bible, though: "Prepare
slaughter for his children for the iniquity of their fathers (Isaiah
14:21). [However, the Bible does contradict itself on this: "...
neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers" (Deut
24:16)]. Also: "visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the
children unto the third and fourth generation" (Exodus 20:5, 34:7,
Numbers 14:18, Deut. 5:9); "His blood be on us, and on our children"
(Matthew 27:25). Bastards may not enter the temple, nor their
descendants (Deut. 23:2). God even killed a baby because of a sin by
its father (2 Samuel 12:14). Ahab escaped punishment for murder by
making an elaborate apology, and his descendants were punished
instead (I Kings 21:29). The doctrine of original sin is also
against this part of the Constitution.
SLAVERY. This was an important social and economic foundation of
our
country both before and after independence. It was an institution
condoned by the founders and recognized and defended by the original
Constitution (Article I, Section 2, paragraph 3; Article I, Section
9; Article IV, Section 2, paragraph 3). Slavery is also condoned in
both the Old and New Testaments, but it is never condemned. On the
contrary, it is codified, and made an inherited condition:
Exodus 21:4ff gives rules for keeping slaves. Leviticus 25:44-46
says that heathen may be purchased as slaves, that their children
become slaves, and that they are inherited as property by the owner's
children forever. Other places that indicate that slavery is a
hereditary condition are: Genesis 9:25, Exodus 21:4, Corinthians
7:20. Deuteronomy 20:10-14 says that when you conquer a city, if it
surrenders then all people inside it become your slaves; but if it
doesn't surrender, then all males are to be killed and all women and
children "take unto thyself". Luke 12:47-8 shows that Jesus approves
of slavery, for he describes the conditions under which one should
give a severe beating to a slave. 1 Timothy 6:1-2 tells slaves to
honor their masters.
In the book of Philemon, Paul sends a runaway slave, Onesimus, back
to his former master. But this conflicts with the admonition in
Deuteronomy 23:15 "Thou shalt not deliver unto his master the servant
which has escaped..." So the Bible is on both sides of the 1857 Dred
Scott case!
TREATMENT OF THE INDIAN PEOPLE. Here is another place where one of
the foundations of our country is justified by the Bible. "Then ye
shall drive out all the inhabitants of the land from before you, and
destroy....And ye shall dispossess the inhabitants of the land, and
dwell therein.." (Numbers 33:52-53). This biblical injunction was
obeyed many times by Americans.
A NOTE ON THE TREATY OF TRIPOLI. This treaty with the Bey of
Tripoli
was negotiated by the administration of President George Washington,
and finally signed and ratified during the administration of
President John Adams, in 1797. Article 11 of the English-language
version says "the United States is in no sense based on the Christian
religion". (There is a mystery about this, since Article 11 doesn't
appear in the Arabic version! It's a fair presumption, though, that
the English version is what was signed by President Adams and duly
ratified by the U. S. Senate. See Bevans: Treaties and Other
International Agreements of the United States of America, 1776-1989,
volume 11 and David Humphreys: Miscellaneous Works (1804).)
Hey, those are some good points.
--
RB
AA#2187
Too bad the fundies who are trying to make this a xian nation won't read
them.
They would have to learn to read first.
------------------------------
aa#2106
Remove Belief to reply
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: America: Founded on Christian Values?? |
18 Jun 2004 04:45:32 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 20:02:14 -0000, Woden <wodencharternet> wrote:
Too bad the fundies who are trying to make this a xian nation won't read
them.
Too bad the atheists who are trying to make this a Godless nation won't read
them.
duke
*****
I have much more to tell you, but you cannot bear
it now. When he comes, the Holy Spirit will declare
to you the things that are coming. John 16:12-15.
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woden wodencharternet" |
|
| Title: Re: America: Founded on Christian Values?? |
18 Jun 2004 05:23:28 PM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in
news:dce5d090db1o9hamkmiao7m3rjskavbc7u@4ax.com:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 20:02:14 -0000, Woden <wodencharternet> wrote:
Too bad the fundies who are trying to make this a xian nation won't
read them.
Too bad the atheists who are trying to make this a Godless nation
won't read them.
LOL. Yes, it would be good for everyone to read them. Maybe you should as
well.
--
Woden
"religion is a socio-political system for controlling people's thoughts,
lives and actions based on ancient myths and superstitions, perpetrated
through generations of subtle yet pervasive brainwashing."
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: America: Founded on Christian Values?? |
19 Jun 2004 07:16:41 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 22:23:28 -0000, Woden <wodencharternet> wrote:
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in
news:dce5d090db1o9hamkmiao7m3rjskavbc7u@4ax.com:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 20:02:14 -0000, Woden <wodencharternet> wrote:
Too bad the fundies who are trying to make this a xian nation won't
read them.
Too bad the atheists who are trying to make this a Godless nation
won't read them.
LOL. Yes, it would be good for everyone to read them. Maybe you should as
well.
But they are founded on Christian Principals.
duke
*****
I have much more to tell you, but you cannot bear
it now. When he comes, the Holy Spirit will declare
to you the things that are coming. John 16:12-15.
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woden wodencharternet" |
|
| Title: Re: America: Founded on Christian Values?? |
19 Jun 2004 07:20:32 AM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in
news:9kb8d0tul42i273hudrd6go3vjd4lgf65d@4ax.com:
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 22:23:28 -0000, Woden <wodencharternet> wrote:
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in
news:dce5d090db1o9hamkmiao7m3rjskavbc7u@4ax.com:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 20:02:14 -0000, Woden <wodencharternet> wrote:
Too bad the fundies who are trying to make this a xian nation won't
read them.
Too bad the atheists who are trying to make this a Godless nation
won't read them.
LOL. Yes, it would be good for everyone to read them. Maybe you
should as well.
But they are founded on Christian Principals.
You do like to maintain your fantasies no matter what, don't you.
--
Woden
"religion is a socio-political system for controlling people's thoughts,
lives and actions based on ancient myths and superstitions, perpetrated
through generations of subtle yet pervasive brainwashing."
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "JessHC" |
|
| Title: Re: America: Founded on Christian Values?? |
18 Jun 2004 10:27:55 AM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:<dce5d090db1o9hamkmiao7m3rjskavbc7u@4ax.com>...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 20:02:14 -0000, Woden <wodencharternet> wrote:
Too bad the fundies who are trying to make this a xian nation won't read
them.
Too bad the atheists who are trying to make this a Godless nation won't read
them.
Wow, you obviously put a *LOT* of thought into that response. It's
amazing how many errors you can pack into one sentence.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brainfried" |
|
| Title: Re: America: Founded on Christian Values?? |
19 Jun 2004 12:18:49 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 08:27:55 -0700, JessHC wrote:
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:<dce5d090db1o9hamkmiao7m3rjskavbc7u@4ax.com>...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 20:02:14 -0000, Woden <wodencharternet> wrote:
Too bad the fundies who are trying to make this a xian nation won't read
them.
Too bad the atheists who are trying to make this a Godless nation won't read
them.
Wow, you obviously put a *LOT* of thought into that response. It's
amazing how many errors you can pack into one sentence.
What do you expect from a sheep?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jim Austin" |
|
| Title: Re: America: Founded on Christian Values?? |
17 Jun 2004 11:02:12 AM |
|
|
Dave DeWolfe wrote:
Evangelicals and Fundamentalists are quick to point out that America
was "founded on Christian values and principals."
It seems that you Bible thumping holy rollers have forgotten that it
was legal to OWN a slave in America from 1787 when the Constitution
was signed until 1865 when the 13th Amendment was ratified which
banned slavery.
Yes, these so-called "Christian" founders of our country apparently
considered people of "color" to be less than human.
Also, nowhere in the Constitution or the Declaration of Independence,
can you find a reference to "Christ" or "Christianity".
America's founders differed from Christianity in a more fundamental
respect.
According to Romans 13 (KJV):
"1. Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no
power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.
"2. Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance
of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation."
This would be the devine right of kings.
The Declaration of Independence says otherwise:
"That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men,
deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, -- That
whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it
is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute
new Government..."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: America: Founded on Christian Values?? |
17 Jun 2004 08:57:43 AM |
|
|
On 17 Jun 2004 02:39:04 -0700, (Dave
DeWolfe) wrote:
Evangelicals and Fundamentalists are quick to point out that America
was "founded on Christian values and principals."
It seems that you Bible thumping holy rollers have forgotten that it
was legal to OWN a slave in America from 1787 when the Constitution
was signed until 1865 when the 13th Amendment was ratified which
banned slavery.
Yes, these so-called "Christian" founders of our country apparently
considered people of "color" to be less than human.
Also, nowhere in the Constitution or the Declaration of Independence,
can you find a reference to "Christ" or "Christianity".
"The Christian in me says it's wrong, but the corrections officer in
me says, 'I love to make a grown man ***** himself."'
This summarises how much "Christian values" are ignored by Christians.
Dave
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eris" |
|
| Title: Re: America: Founded on Christian Values?? |
08 Jul 2004 10:10:24 AM |
|
|
On 17 Jun 2004 02:39:04 -0700, (Dave
DeWolfe) wrote:
Yes, these so-called "Christian" founders of our country apparently
considered people of "color" to be less than human.
The words "all men are created equal" caused quite a stir in Colonial
times and the african people were discussed at great length. They
finally came up with something that declared that the Africans were
not actually men. I forget how. After that it was easy to insert "all
men are created equal"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: America: Founded on Christian Values?? |
17 Jun 2004 08:58:42 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 02:39:04 -0700 in episode
<51e38557.0406170139.1fe3489b@posting.google.com> we saw our hero
dave-dewolfe@sbcglobal.net (Dave DeWolfe):
Evangelicals and Fundamentalists are quick to point out that America was
"founded on Christian values and principals."
It seems that you Bible thumping holy rollers have forgotten that it was
legal to OWN a slave in America from 1787 when the Constitution was signed
until 1865 when the 13th Amendment was ratified which banned slavery.
Yes, these so-called "Christian" founders of our country apparently
considered people of "color" to be less than human.
Also, nowhere in the Constitution or the Declaration of Independence, can
you find a reference to "Christ" or "Christianity".
Not to mention that "thou shalt not kill" and "thou shalt not steal" seem
to have had asterisks next to them with a note:
"Unless thou wants native lands."
(It's an amazingly flexible absolute morality they got)
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"I think it's the worst kept secret in Washington.
That everybody - everybody I talk to in Washington
has known and fully knows what [the neo-conservative]
agenda was and what they were trying to do."
[Retired General Anthony Zinni]
.
|
|
|
| User: "Therion Ware" |
|
| Title: Re: America: Founded on Christian Values?? |
17 Jun 2004 09:57:40 AM |
|
|
On the auspictious date of Thu, 17 Jun 2004 08:58:42 -0500, Mark K.
Bilbo said unto the multitude in message-id
<pan.2004.06.17.13.58.42.319898@hoo.com-amikchi>:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 02:39:04 -0700 in episode
<51e38557.0406170139.1fe3489b@posting.google.com> we saw our hero
dave-dewolfe@sbcglobal.net (Dave DeWolfe):
Evangelicals and Fundamentalists are quick to point out that America was
"founded on Christian values and principals."
It seems that you Bible thumping holy rollers have forgotten that it was
legal to OWN a slave in America from 1787 when the Constitution was signed
until 1865 when the 13th Amendment was ratified which banned slavery.
Yes, these so-called "Christian" founders of our country apparently
considered people of "color" to be less than human.
Also, nowhere in the Constitution or the Declaration of Independence, can
you find a reference to "Christ" or "Christianity".
Not to mention that "thou shalt not kill"
Oh come now: "Thou shalt not murder". It's so much more convenient
that way in as much as it provides a *lot* of wiggle room.
and "thou shalt not steal"
A mother steals food for her starving children.
seem
to have had asterisks next to them with a note:
Oh, only the elect can see the footnotes. Rather as only the really
intelligent can see the Emperors new clothes.
"Unless thou wants native lands."
(It's an amazingly flexible absolute morality they got)
Heh. Indeed. But of course Christian "absolute morality" is not
"absolute" at all. The problem with categorical imperatives is that
one can always find exceptions: for example: Thou shalt not lie.
The Gestapo ask me where the Jews are hiding. Should I tell then the
truth, seeing as I know where the Jews are hiding?
If it's *absolutely true* that telling lies is wrong, then I should
tell the truth even if this results in a rather impressive number of
deaths.
Odd. But not odder than what they as us to believe.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "jw" |
|
| Title: Re: America: Founded on Christian Values?? |
17 Jun 2004 06:05:40 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 08:58:42 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<y@hoo.com-amikchi> wrote:
john w replied under copyright 2004
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 02:39:04 -0700 in episode
<51e38557.0406170139.1fe3489b@posting.google.com> we saw our hero
dave-dewolfe@sbcglobal.net (Dave DeWolfe):
Evangelicals and Fundamentalists are quick to point out that America was
"founded on Christian values and principals."
It seems that you Bible thumping holy rollers have forgotten that it was
legal to OWN a slave in America from 1787 when the Constitution was signed
until 1865 when the 13th Amendment was ratified which banned slavery.
Yes, these so-called "Christian" founders of our country apparently
considered people of "color" to be less than human.
Also, nowhere in the Constitution or the Declaration of Independence, can
you find a reference to "Christ" or "Christianity".
Not to mention that "thou shalt not kill" and "thou shalt not steal" seem
to have had asterisks next to them with a note:
"Unless thou wants native lands."
Methinks Rev Dr. Bilbo has overlooked several facts, or never knew
them to begin with. The Jews had no land they didn't conquer by force.
In each case, as they moved, God would pick out a civilization, a
tribe, a culture, that the Jews were to eradicate because that
civilization had become so morally corrupt that God could no longer
stomach them. And since God gives life, God has the right to take it.
Even the land the Jews now occupy was once called "Canaan", and the
Jews ere told by God to take it by force from the Canaanites, whom
they were to eradicate, since the Canaanites had lived a culture
totally contrary to God's sensibilities.
You and the non-Christian historians are bloody presumptuous
non-believers to believe that Christians did anything "wrong" when
they conquered America and took it from the Indians.
You have NO idea what God told the Pilgrims to do in the New World. It
is the view of MANY Christians, including me, that "Manifest Destiny"
isn't merely an ugly catch phrase, but indicates how America came to
be.
It was ordained by God. Looking back at America's history, these past
200 + years, for all the evil we've done as a nation, we've done 100
times as much good.
And those who have done evil without God's approval will pay.
(It's an amazingly flexible absolute morality they got)
You have no right whatever to judge God or Christians as a
non-Christian. That's like telling people how terrible Rolls Royces
are while you are looking through the window of the Rolls Royce
dealership. Merely because you don't want one or can't afford one
doesn't give you the right to criticize those with whom you disagree.
MANY "moral values" in the Bible are flexible, you bet. Which church
to attend, what day to worship, what toothpaste to use, what version
of the Bible to use, whether to use grape juice or wine at the Lord's
Table, which hymns to sing. (YOU may not believe those are moral
issues; many do).
There are those who believe it's evil to wash your car on Saturday
(the Sabbatarians).
jw
.
|
|
|
| User: "Desdinova" |
|
| Title: Re: America: Founded on Christian Values?? |
17 Jun 2004 06:31:06 PM |
|
|
"jw @yahoo.com>" <john_weatherly47<no> wrote in message
news:tb84d0djkkg51ilh93anuqpdgseq9j6t6n@4ax.com...
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 08:58:42 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<y@hoo.com-amikchi> wrote:
john w replied under copyright 2004
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 02:39:04 -0700 in episode
<51e38557.0406170139.1fe3489b@posting.google.com> we saw our hero
dave-dewolfe@sbcglobal.net (Dave DeWolfe):
Evangelicals and Fundamentalists are quick to point out that America
was
"founded on Christian values and principals."
It seems that you Bible thumping holy rollers have forgotten that it
was
legal to OWN a slave in America from 1787 when the Constitution was
signed
until 1865 when the 13th Amendment was ratified which banned slavery.
Yes, these so-called "Christian" founders of our country apparently
considered people of "color" to be less than human.
Also, nowhere in the Constitution or the Declaration of Independence,
can
you find a reference to "Christ" or "Christianity".
Not to mention that "thou shalt not kill" and "thou shalt not steal" seem
to have had asterisks next to them with a note:
"Unless thou wants native lands."
Methinks Rev Dr. Bilbo has overlooked several facts, or never knew
them to begin with. The Jews had no land they didn't conquer by force.
In each case, as they moved, God would pick out a civilization, a
tribe, a culture, that the Jews were to eradicate because that
civilization had become so morally corrupt that God could no longer
stomach them. And since God gives life, God has the right to take it.
Even the land the Jews now occupy was once called "Canaan", and the
Jews ere told by God to take it by force from the Canaanites, whom
they were to eradicate, since the Canaanites had lived a culture
totally contrary to God's sensibilities.
Which proves your god is a muderous *****!
You and the non-Christian historians are bloody presumptuous
non-believers to believe that Christians did anything "wrong" when
they conquered America and took it from the Indians.
So near-genocide is justified by god? Not a god worth worshiping!
You have NO idea what God told the Pilgrims to do in the New World. It
is the view of MANY Christians, including me, that "Manifest Destiny"
isn't merely an ugly catch phrase, but indicates how America came to
be.
If god didn't want the indians in America why did he put them there in the
first place?
It was ordained by God. Looking back at America's history, these past
200 + years, for all the evil we've done as a nation, we've done 100
times as much good.
And those who have done evil without God's approval will pay.
Only your god's evil is OK then?
(It's an amazingly flexible absolute morality they got <sic>)
That should be " It's an amazingly flexible absolute morality they have">
You have no right whatever to judge God or Christians as a
non-Christian.
You want us to follow your god because you say is good and just.
I think a review of his record is in order.
<That's like telling people how terrible Rolls Royces
are while you are looking through the window of the Rolls Royce
dealership. Merely because you don't want one or can't afford one
doesn't give you the right to criticize those with whom you disagree.
Using your analogy, I test-drove your god for 35 years. Forward visiblity
was limited.
It was impossible to start and very high maintenance.
MANY "moral values" in the Bible are flexible
Especially "Thou shalt not kill".
<, you bet. Which church
to attend, what day to worship, what toothpaste to use, what version
of the Bible to use, whether to use grape juice or wine at the Lord's
Table, which hymns to sing. (YOU may not believe those are moral
issues; many do).
There are those who believe it's evil to wash your car on Saturday
(the Sabbatarians).
That's good. I wouldn't want to get sent to hell for using the wrong
toothpaste!
--
Desdinova - AA #2182
Remove "nospam" for e-mail
EAC Director of Covert Ops and Black Helicopter Pilot
Christianity has such a contemptible opinion of human
nature that it does not believe a man can tell the truth
unless frightened by a belief in God. No lower opinion
of the human race has ever been expressed.
-- Robert Green Ingersoll
.
|
|
|
| User: "gaffo" |
|
| Title: Re: America: Founded on Christian Values?? |
17 Jun 2004 07:18:26 PM |
|
|
Desdinova wrote:
Only your god's evil is OK then?
Yes John is a Nazi who worships the Devil. His God's evil is ok.
--
http://baltimorechronicle.com/041704reTreason.shtml
http://www.truthinaction.net/iraq/illegaljayne.htm
As nightfall does not come all at once, neither does oppression. In both
instances, there is a twilight when everything remains seemingly unchanged.
And it is in such twilight that we all must be aware of change in the air
-- however slight -lest we become unwitting victims of the darkness.
Justice William O. Douglas, US Supreme Court (1939-75)
"It shows us that there were senior people in the Bush administration who
were seriously contemplating the use of torture, and trying to figure out
whether there were any legal loopholes that might allow them to commit
criminal acts, They seem to be putting forward a theory that the president
in wartime can essentially do what he wants regardless of what the law
may say,"
Tom Malinowski of Human Rights Watch - commenting upon Defense
Department Lawyer
Will Dunham's 56-page legalization of torture memo.
If you add all of those up, you should have a conservative rebellion against
the giant corporation in the White House masquerading as a human being named
George W. Bush. Just as progressives have been abandoned by the corporate
Democrats and told, "You got nowhere to go other than to stay home or
vote for
the Democrats", this is the fate of the authentic conservatives in the
Republican Party.
Ralph Nader - June 2004 - The American Conservative Magazine
"But I believe in torture and I will torture you."
-An American soldier shares the joys of Democracy with
an Iraqi prisoner.
"My mother praises me for fighting the Americans. If we are killed,
our wives and mothers will rejoice that we died defending the
freedom of our country.
-Iraqi Mahdi fighter
"We were bleeding from 3 a.m. until sunrise, soon American soldiers came.
One of them kicked me to see if I was alive. I pretended I was dead
so he wouldn't kill me. The soldier was laughing, when Yousef cried,
the soldier said: "'No, stop,"
-Shihab, survivor of USSA bombing of Iraqi wedding.
"the absolute convergence of the neoconservatives with the Christian
Zionists
and the pro-Israel lobby, driving U.S. Mideast policy."
-Don Wagner, an evangelical South Carolina minister
"Bush, in Austin, criticized President Clinton's administration for
the Kosovo military action.'Victory means exit strategy, and it's important
for the president to explain to us what the exit strategy is,' Bush said."
Houston Chronicle 4/9/99
"Iraqis are sick of foreign people coming in their country and trying to
destabilize their country."
Washington, D.C., May 5, 2004
"The new administration seems to be paying no attention to the problem
of terrorism. What they will do is stagger along until there's a major
incident and then suddenly say, 'Oh my God, shouldn't we be organized
to deal with this?'"
- Paul Bremer, speaking to a McCormick Tribune Foundation conference
on terrorism in Wheaton, Ill. on Feb. 26, 2001.
"On Jan. 26, 1998, President Clinton received a letter imploring him to use
his State of the Union address to make removal of Saddam Hussein's regime
the "aim of American foreign policy" and to use military action because
"diplomacy is failing." Were Clinton to do that, the signers pledged, they
would "offer our full support in this difficult but necessary endeavor."
Signing the pledge were Elliott Abrams, Bill Bennett, John Bolton, Robert
Kagan, William Kristol, Richard Perle, Richard L. Armitage, Jeffrey
Bergner,
Paula Dobriansky, Francis Fukuyama, Zalmay Khalilzad, Peter W. Rodman,
William Schneider, Jr., Vin Weber, R. James Woolsey and Robert B. Zoellick,
Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz. Four years before 9/11, the neocons had
Baghdad on their minds."
-philip (usenet)
"I had better things to do in the 60s than fight in Vietnam,"
-Richard Cheney, Kerry critic.
"I hope they will understand that in order for this government to get up
and running
- to be effective - some of its sovereignty will have to be given
back, if I can put it that way,
or limited | | | | |