Religions > Atheism > Americans more likely than Muslims to support attacks on civilians
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Deuteros" |
| Date: |
26 Feb 2007 07:51:45 PM |
| Object: |
Americans more likely than Muslims to support attacks on civilians |
According to a recent poll done by the University of Maryland, Americans
are more likely to support attacks against civilians than citizens of
every other Muslim country except Nigeria. This poll challenges the
popular belief that Islam is a religion of war and the United States is a
nation of peace.
http://fraudwasteabuse.wordpress.com/2007/02/25/americans-more-likely-to-support-attacks-on-civilians-than-muslims/
.
|
|
| User: "Hertz_Donut" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans more likely than Muslims to support attacks on civilians |
26 Feb 2007 09:31:17 PM |
|
|
"Deuteros" <deuteros@xrs.net> wrote in message
news:es02rh$rff$1@news.onet.pl...
According to a recent poll done by the University of Maryland, Americans
are more likely to support attacks against civilians than citizens of
every other Muslim country except Nigeria. This poll challenges the
popular belief that Islam is a religion of war and the United States is a
nation of peace.
http://fraudwasteabuse.wordpress.com/2007/02/25/americans-more-likely-to-support-attacks-on-civilians-than-muslims/
Islam is a religion that teaches peace. It is only those that pervert Islam
for their own causes that should be wiped from the face of the earth.
Muqtada Al-Sader, bin Laden, et al. are not Muslims. They are monsters that
use the name of Allah to kill, rape and torture. They are a sickness, a
cancer, that should be cut away and discarded.
Honu
.
|
|
|
| User: "dapra" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans more likely than Muslims to support attacks on civilians |
26 Feb 2007 09:48:21 PM |
|
|
Hertz_Donut wrote:
"Deuteros" <deuteros@xrs.net> wrote in message
news:es02rh$rff$1@news.onet.pl...
According to a recent poll done by the University of Maryland, Americans
are more likely to support attacks against civilians than citizens of
every other Muslim country except Nigeria. This poll challenges the
popular belief that Islam is a religion of war and the United States is a
nation of peace.
http://fraudwasteabuse.wordpress.com/2007/02/25/americans-more-likely-to-support-attacks-on-civilians-than-muslims/
Islam is a religion that teaches peace. It is only those that pervert Islam
for their own causes that should be wiped from the face of the earth.
Muqtada Al-Sader, bin Laden, et al. are not Muslims. They are monsters that
use the name of Allah to kill, rape and torture. They are a sickness, a
cancer, that should be cut away and discarded.
Honu
The 'sin' of Muqtada al Sadr is to want the US out of Iraq. That's
unforgivable sin according to the Bush regime. Sadr is an obstacle of
the Bush Cabals global dominion based on unquestioned military supremacy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hertz_Donut" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans more likely than Muslims to support attacks on civilians |
27 Feb 2007 01:19:16 AM |
|
|
"dapra" <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Beudnf796fF2NH7YnZ2dnUVZ_o-knZ2d@comcast.com...
Hertz_Donut wrote:
"Deuteros" <deuteros@xrs.net> wrote in message
news:es02rh$rff$1@news.onet.pl...
According to a recent poll done by the University of Maryland, Americans
are more likely to support attacks against civilians than citizens of
every other Muslim country except Nigeria. This poll challenges the
popular belief that Islam is a religion of war and the United States is a
nation of peace.
http://fraudwasteabuse.wordpress.com/2007/02/25/americans-more-likely-to-support-attacks-on-civilians-than-muslims/
Islam is a religion that teaches peace. It is only those that pervert
Islam for their own causes that should be wiped from the face of the
earth.
Muqtada Al-Sader, bin Laden, et al. are not Muslims. They are monsters
that use the name of Allah to kill, rape and torture. They are a
sickness, a cancer, that should be cut away and discarded.
Honu
The 'sin' of Muqtada al Sadr is to want the US out of Iraq. That's
unforgivable sin according to the Bush regime. Sadr is an obstacle of the
Bush Cabals global dominion based on unquestioned military supremacy.
The "sin" of Muqtada Al Sadr is to kill all who will not bend to his
will...regardless of age, nationality, or sex.
You are just too ignorant to see that. You are hobbled by your own hatred.
Honu
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Price" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans more likely than Muslims to support attacks on civilians |
27 Feb 2007 09:56:33 AM |
|
|
Hertz_Donut wrote:
"dapra" <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Beudnf796fF2NH7YnZ2dnUVZ_o-knZ2d@comcast.com...
Hertz_Donut wrote:
"Deuteros" <deuteros@xrs.net> wrote in message
news:es02rh$rff$1@news.onet.pl...
According to a recent poll done by the University of Maryland, Americans
are more likely to support attacks against civilians than citizens of
every other Muslim country except Nigeria. This poll challenges the
popular belief that Islam is a religion of war and the United States is a
nation of peace.
http://fraudwasteabuse.wordpress.com/2007/02/25/americans-more-likely-to-support-attacks-on-civilians-than-muslims/
Islam is a religion that teaches peace. It is only those that pervert
Islam for their own causes that should be wiped from the face of the
earth.
Muqtada Al-Sader, bin Laden, et al. are not Muslims. They are monsters
that use the name of Allah to kill, rape and torture. They are a
sickness, a cancer, that should be cut away and discarded.
Honu
The 'sin' of Muqtada al Sadr is to want the US out of Iraq. That's
unforgivable sin according to the Bush regime. Sadr is an obstacle of the
Bush Cabals global dominion based on unquestioned military supremacy.
The "sin" of Muqtada Al Sadr is to kill all who will not bend to his
will...regardless of age, nationality, or sex.
Got any actual evidence of that or are you just going on what
"sources" tell
you? Muqtada didn't start the fight with the US government, they did
by
violently violating his first amendment rights (and he has them
according to
the constitution US troops are obliged to obey).
You are just too ignorant to see that. You are hobbled by your own hatred.
Honu
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Price" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans more likely than Muslims to support attacks on civilians |
27 Feb 2007 10:05:14 AM |
|
|
Hertz_Donut wrote:
"dapra" <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Beudnf796fF2NH7YnZ2dnUVZ_o-knZ2d@comcast.com...
Hertz_Donut wrote:
"Deuteros" <deuteros@xrs.net> wrote in message
news:es02rh$rff$1@news.onet.pl...
According to a recent poll done by the University of Maryland, Americans
are more likely to support attacks against civilians than citizens of
every other Muslim country except Nigeria. This poll challenges the
popular belief that Islam is a religion of war and the United States is a
nation of peace.
http://fraudwasteabuse.wordpress.com/2007/02/25/americans-more-likely-to-support-attacks-on-civilians-than-muslims/
Islam is a religion that teaches peace. It is only those that pervert
Islam for their own causes that should be wiped from the face of the
earth.
Muqtada Al-Sader, bin Laden, et al. are not Muslims. They are monsters
that use the name of Allah to kill, rape and torture. They are a
sickness, a cancer, that should be cut away and discarded.
Honu
The 'sin' of Muqtada al Sadr is to want the US out of Iraq. That's
unforgivable sin according to the Bush regime. Sadr is an obstacle of the
Bush Cabals global dominion based on unquestioned military supremacy.
The "sin" of Muqtada Al Sadr is to kill all who will not bend to his
will...regardless of age, nationality, or sex.
Got any actual evidence of that or are you just going on what
"sources" tell
you? Muqtada didn't start the fight with the US government, they did
by
violently violating his first amendment rights (and he has them
according to
the constitution US troops are obliged to obey).
You are just too ignorant to see that. You are hobbled by your own hatred.
Honu
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Defendario" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans more likely than Muslims to support attacks on civilians |
27 Feb 2007 03:00:52 AM |
|
|
Hertz_Donut wrote:
"dapra" <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Beudnf796fF2NH7YnZ2dnUVZ_o-knZ2d@comcast.com...
Hertz_Donut wrote:
"Deuteros" <deuteros@xrs.net> wrote in message
news:es02rh$rff$1@news.onet.pl...
According to a recent poll done by the University of Maryland, Americans
are more likely to support attacks against civilians than citizens of
every other Muslim country except Nigeria. This poll challenges the
popular belief that Islam is a religion of war and the United States is a
nation of peace.
http://fraudwasteabuse.wordpress.com/2007/02/25/americans-more-likely-to-support-attacks-on-civilians-than-muslims/
Islam is a religion that teaches peace. It is only those that pervert
Islam for their own causes that should be wiped from the face of the
earth.
Muqtada Al-Sader, bin Laden, et al. are not Muslims. They are monsters
that use the name of Allah to kill, rape and torture. They are a
sickness, a cancer, that should be cut away and discarded.
Honu
The 'sin' of Muqtada al Sadr is to want the US out of Iraq. That's
unforgivable sin according to the Bush regime. Sadr is an obstacle of the
Bush Cabals global dominion based on unquestioned military supremacy.
The "sin" of Muqtada Al Sadr is to kill all who will not bend to his
will...regardless of age, nationality, or sex.
Then Muqtada has a perfect Tu Quoque defense against our prosecution,
doesn't he?
You are just too ignorant to see that. You are hobbled by your own hatred.
You're hobbled by being paid to tell lies. They aren't holding up.
***** Gnu
;D
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robert" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans more likely than Muslims to support attacks on civilians |
27 Feb 2007 03:45:14 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 21:19:16 -1000, "Hertz_Donut" <noone@nowhere.com>
wrote:
"dapra" <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Beudnf796fF2NH7YnZ2dnUVZ_o-knZ2d@comcast.com...
Hertz_Donut wrote:
"Deuteros" <deuteros@xrs.net> wrote in message
news:es02rh$rff$1@news.onet.pl...
According to a recent poll done by the University of Maryland, Americans
are more likely to support attacks against civilians than citizens of
every other Muslim country except Nigeria. This poll challenges the
popular belief that Islam is a religion of war and the United States is a
nation of peace.
http://fraudwasteabuse.wordpress.com/2007/02/25/americans-more-likely-to-support-attacks-on-civilians-than-muslims/
Islam is a religion that teaches peace. It is only those that pervert
Islam for their own causes that should be wiped from the face of the
earth.
Muqtada Al-Sader, bin Laden, et al. are not Muslims. They are monsters
that use the name of Allah to kill, rape and torture. They are a
sickness, a cancer, that should be cut away and discarded.
Honu
The 'sin' of Muqtada al Sadr is to want the US out of Iraq. That's
unforgivable sin according to the Bush regime. Sadr is an obstacle of the
Bush Cabals global dominion based on unquestioned military supremacy.
The "sin" of Muqtada Al Sadr is to kill all who will not bend to his
will...regardless of age, nationality, or sex.
You are just too ignorant to see that. You are hobbled by your own hatred.
Honu
Or a freedom fighter fighting for his country against a foreign
invader. Who you support.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Derek Currie" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans more likely than Muslims to support attacks on civilians |
27 Feb 2007 10:47:44 AM |
|
|
In article <LLudnT9RYv2NO37YnZ2dnUVZ_oOonZ2d@hawaiiantel.net>,
"Hertz_Donut" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote:
"Deuteros" <deuteros@xrs.net> wrote in message
news:es02rh$rff$1@news.onet.pl...
According to a recent poll done by the University of Maryland, Americans
are more likely to support attacks against civilians than citizens of
every other Muslim country except Nigeria. This poll challenges the
popular belief that Islam is a religion of war and the United States is a
nation of peace.
http://fraudwasteabuse.wordpress.com/2007/02/25/americans-more-likely-to-sup
port-attacks-on-civilians-than-muslims/
Islam is a religion that teaches peace. It is only those that pervert Islam
for their own causes that should be wiped from the face of the earth.
Please be careful! As soon as you define something to be so
'true' that others must die for its cause, no matter what the
cause, you have become a fool. No one should ever die over the
tenuous ability of mankind to sense and analyze 'reality'. As I
often say: We never know everything about anything.
However, that having been said I have to agree:
Muqtada Al-Sader, bin Laden, et al. are not Muslims. They are monsters that
use the name of Allah to kill, rape and torture. They are a sickness, a
cancer, that should be cut away and discarded.
Honu
Bravo Honu. Thank you.
--
Fortune Magazine 11-29-05: What's your computer setup today?
Frederick Brooks: I happily use a Macintosh. It's not been
equalled for ease of use, and I want my computer to be a tool,
not a challenge.
<http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2005/12/12/8363107/>
[Frederick Brooks is the author of 'The Mythical Man Month'.
He spearheaded the movement to modernize computer software
engineering in 1975.]
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "dapra" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans more likely than Muslims to support attacks on civilians |
26 Feb 2007 08:21:56 PM |
|
|
Deuteros wrote:
According to a recent poll done by the University of Maryland, Americans
are more likely to support attacks against civilians than citizens of
every other Muslim country except Nigeria. This poll challenges the
popular belief that Islam is a religion of war and the United States is a
nation of peace.
The people of the US live in a media induced coma. By in large they have
no ability to distinguish propaganda from reality.
.
|
|
|
| User: "C The Shocker" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans more likely than Muslims to support attacks on civilians |
26 Feb 2007 08:25:54 PM |
|
|
"dapra" <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:MJudnXE8FM83CH7YnZ2dnUVZ_qarnZ2d@comcast.com...
Deuteros wrote:
According to a recent poll done by the University of Maryland, Americans
are more likely to support attacks against civilians than citizens of
every other Muslim country except Nigeria. This poll challenges the
popular belief that Islam is a religion of war and the United States is a
nation of peace.
The people of the US live in a media induced coma. By in large they have
no ability to distinguish propaganda from reality.
Aint that the truth.
--
C The Shocker
The Rebirth of Slick. Back by popular demand.
RSPW and RSFC's most dangerous poster.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "NuGrass" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans more likely than Muslims to support attacks on civilians |
26 Feb 2007 08:42:01 PM |
|
|
On Feb 26, 9:21=EF=BF=BDpm, dapra <dap...@comcast.net> wrote:
Deuteros wrote:
According to a recent poll done by the University of Maryland, Americans
are more likely to support attacks against civilians than citizens of
every other Muslim country except Nigeria. This poll challenges the
popular belief that Islam is a religion of war and the United States is=
a
nation of peace.
=A0>
The people of the US live in a media induced coma. By in large they have
no ability to distinguish propaganda from reality.
Maybe your should try breaking rhe mold and start thinking for
yourself, then.
.
|
|
|
| User: "dapra" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans more likely than Muslims to support attacks on civilians |
26 Feb 2007 09:14:08 PM |
|
|
NuGrass wrote:
On Feb 26, 9:21�pm, dapra <dap...@comcast.net> wrote:
Deuteros wrote:
According to a recent poll done by the University of Maryland, Americans
are more likely to support attacks against civilians than citizens of
every other Muslim country except Nigeria. This poll challenges the
popular belief that Islam is a religion of war and the United States is a
nation of peace.
�>
The people of the US live in a media induced coma. By in large they have
no ability to distinguish propaganda from reality.
Maybe your should try breaking rhe mold and start thinking for
yourself, then.
I do.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Derek Currie" |
|
| Title: Re: Americans more likely than Muslims to support attacks on civilians |
27 Feb 2007 11:23:18 AM |
|
|
This is going OFF TOPIC. You have been warned:
In article <MJudnXE8FM83CH7YnZ2dnUVZ_qarnZ2d@comcast.com>,
dapra <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote:
The people of the US live in a media induced coma. By in large they have
no ability to distinguish propaganda from reality.
Well, this is certainly the driving goal behind much of the media
garbage in the USA. Here is a sample:
Evaluations have been made of the knowledge level of US citizens
with regard to what they use as their source of news. It was
discovered that the very least informed citizens were those who
depended upon FOX NEWS for their new. Note that FOX is the
darling of the Bush League. The citizens who were the most
informed were those who depended up on the US Public Broadcasting
System and National Public Radio. Note that the Bush League
proposed in their budget for last year to perform a 'FINAL
SOLUTION' upon Public broadcasting by cutting off all funding
within two years. Thankfully the failed. This year they have
proposed a 25% cut. I think you get the point: Crap news is good
news.
Then there is the plethora of HATE MEDIA from both the right and
left political spectrum that screws with the minds of
well-meaning people every day on TV and radio. You end up utterly
confused in waves of lies, sarcasm, dogma, subterfuge, deceit,
everything but simple, positive, constructive directions for
making our country a better place to live.
Certainly, as a USA citizen who knew George W. Bush was a total
dope after listening to him talk on TV for half for half an hour,
I have been profoundly disappointed with my country for voting
for his stupidness TWICE (albeit actually an appointment by the
Supreme Court the first time). My belief is that his stupidness
was elected due to saying what a large proportion of the
citizenry wanted to hear. The usual phrase for this behavior is
'Bait And Switch.' You're promised one thing and get often the
exact opposite. A huge number of people here expected a moral
administration. Of course they got the most corrupt
administration since Nixon, where obvious legal points and
concepts of the Constitution have been wiped out using mere
rhetoric. The Bush League would clearly like to keep the USA
frightened with FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt) every single
day in order to allow the office of the President to become the
office of THE DECIDER (aka DICTATOR / BIG BROTHER). I could write
a long essay on this catastrophe of politics. Enough for now.
Nonetheless, the 'sleeping masses' will eventually wake up when
slapped in the face enough times with the knowledge that their
government has made massive blunders, has deeply lied to them,
and does not wish them well. The USA is in the midst of that
turbulence right now.
Of course the question is: What to do next?
The ideal solution most certainly has NOTHING to do with the
idiotic 2 party system in the USA where you never vote for actual
REPRESENTATIVES. Instead you vote for political zombies who live
in the insane world of party politics. I'd like the entire party
system abolished. I consider it entirely out of date and only
slightly better than plutocracy. Surprisingly the Constitution
holds up well, if we just follow it when running our government.
:-D
--
Fortune Magazine 11-29-05: What's your computer setup today?
Frederick Brooks: I happily use a Macintosh. It's not been
equalled for ease of use, and I want my computer to be a tool,
not a challenge.
<http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2005/12/12/8363107/>
[Frederick Brooks is the author of 'The Mythical Man Month'.
He spearheaded the movement to modernize computer software
engineering in 1975.]
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Americans more likely than Muslims to support attacks on civilians |
26 Feb 2007 08:14:04 PM |
|
|
In article <es02rh$rff$1@news.onet.pl>, Deuteros <deuteros@xrs.net>
wrote:
According to a recent poll done by the University of Maryland, Americans
are more likely to support attacks against civilians than citizens of
every other Muslim country except Nigeria. This poll challenges the
popular belief that Islam is a religion of war and the United States is a
nation of peace.
http://fraudwasteabuse.wordpress.com/2007/02/25/americans-more-likely-to-suppo
rt-attacks-on-civilians-than-muslims/
i wasn't aware that "popular belief" was held by anyone but religious
crazies.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
