clitteigh wrote:
To Americunts:
For the sake of the United States of America, now, and the future, the
question can't be IF, but WHEN will the White House War criminal be
IMPEACHED?
From The Washington Post:
A declassified report released yesterday [Sept. 8, 2006] by the Senate
Select Committee on Intelligence revealed that U.S. intelligence
analysts were strongly disputing the alleged links between Saddam
Hussein and al-Qaeda while senior Bush administration officials were
publicly asserting those links to justify invading Iraq.
Far from aligning himself with al-Qaeda and Jordanian terrorist Abu
Musab al-Zarqawi, Hussein repeatedly rebuffed al-Qaeda's overtures and
tried to capture Zarqawi, the report said. Tariq Aziz, the detained
former deputy prime minister, has told the FBI that Hussein "only
expressed negative sentiments about [Osama] bin Laden."
The report also said exiles from the Iraqi National Congress (INC)
tried to influence U.S. policy by providing, through defectors, false
information on Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons
capabilities. After skeptical analysts warned that the group had been
penetrated by hostile intelligence services, including Iran's, a 2002
White House directive ordered that U.S. funding for the INC be
continued.
The newly declassified intelligence report provided administration
critics with fresh ammunition, less than two months before midterm
elections and in the middle of President Bush's campaign to refocus the
public's attention away from Iraq and toward the threat of terrorism.
Senior Senate Democrats immediately seized on the findings, using some
of their strongest language yet to say the president continues to
willfully and falsely connect Hussein to al-Qaeda.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/08/AR2006090=
800777.html
------------------
The long-awaited Senate Intelligence Committee report released
yesterday [Sept. 8] sheds new light on why U.S. intelligence agencies
provided inaccurate prewar information about Saddam Hussein and his
weapons programs, including details on how Iraqi exiles who fabricated
or exaggerated their stories were accepted as truthful because they
passed Pentagon lie detector tests.
The two newly declassified chapters of the report fueled political
accusations yesterday that the Bush administration lied to justify
invading Iraq, but the documents' nearly 400 pages contain several
examples of how bad information wound up accepted as truthful in
intelligence assessments at the time.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/08/AR2006090=
801719.html
--------------------
=3D> Vox Populi=A9 wrote:
"lep" <lepetitemort@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:pMqdndd_UPLh25_YRVnyqQ@pipex.net...
http://www.voanews.com/english/2006-09-08-voa54.cfm
A report by a Senate committee says there is no evidence former Iraqi=
dictator
Saddam Hussein had any relationship with the al-Qaida terrorist leade=
r Abu
Musab al-Zarqawi or his associates before the U.S. and allied forces =
invaded
Iraq in 2003.
OFC there were weapons of mass destruction and Al-quida were linked t=
o saddam.
NOT
You pack of stupid bastards.
..=2E.begin Fred mode...
It's all a vast left-wing conspiracy!
..=2E.end Fred mode...
.
