Andrew B. Chung Bible Study of the Day: Rape is Okay

Religions > Atheism > Andrew B. Chung Bible Study of the Day: Rape is Okay

LINK TO THIS PAGE

rating : 0 | 0

Page 1 of 2

Topic:	Religions > Atheism
User:	"Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass"
Date:	18 Dec 2005 12:06:39 PM
Object:	Andrew B. Chung Bible Study of the Day: Rape is Okay

What a deal! A loser like duke can rape some poor teen girl and her
penalty is that she has to be married to him!
"If a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married
and rapes her and they are discovered, 29 he shall pay the girl's
father fifty shekels of silver. [c] He must marry the girl, for he has
violated her. He can never divorce her as long as he lives. "
-Deuteronomy 22:28-29
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka

aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -2151 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
-----
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
-duke (duckgumbo32@cox.net), aka PedophilEarl J Weber, 63
year old mateless, heirless biological failure
of Afton Oaks Apartment, Baton Rouge, on why
a Neocon chickenhawk like him pussied out of
the Vietnam War.
.

User: "The Last Conformist"
Title: Re: Andrew B. Chung Bible Study of the Day: Rape is Okay	18 Dec 2005 01:51:37 PM

Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:

I note there's no limit on how many girls one can marry this way.
.

User: "Jim-Poncin"
Title: Re: Andrew B. Chung Bible Study of the Day: Rape is Okay	18 Dec 2005 02:27:11 PM

"The Last Conformist" <andreasj@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1134935497.250313.217380@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:

I note there's no limit on how many girls one can marry this way.

Is the religious right thinking of making this legal in the US, as a part of
returning to higher values?
.

User: "Ananias917"
Title: Re: Andrew B. Chung Bible Study of the Day: Rape is Okay	18 Dec 2005 06:56:52 PM

On 18 Dec 2005 11:51:37 -0800, "The Last Conformist"
<andreasj@gmail.com> spake thusly:

Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:

I note there's no limit on how many girls one can marry this way.

Actually, it says, "A virgin". :)
--
"And Ananias went his way, and entered into the house;
and putting his hands on him said, Brother Saul, the
Lord, even Jesus, that appeared unto thee in the way
as thou camest, hath sent me, that thou mightest
receive thy sight, and be filled with the Holy Ghost."
- Acts 9:17
.

User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
Title: Re: Andrew B. Chung Bible Study of the Day: Rape is Okay	18 Dec 2005 10:54:01 PM

Ananias917 wrote:

On 18 Dec 2005 11:51:37 -0800, "The Last Conformist"
<andreasj@gmail.com> spake thusly:

Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:

I note there's no limit on how many girls one can marry this way.

Actually, it says, "A virgin". :)

Indeed, that would be a significant limitation here in the U.S. Not to
mention the amount of dollars that would be the equivalent of fifty
shekels of silver back then (probably about US$50,000.00) and no
divorce (presumably even if she chooses to live with someone else at
the husband's expense).
The LORD is kind, just, and right.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/22/05) from 6 to 7 pm
EST:
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
how the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
Many Christmas blessings,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.

User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass"
Title: Re: Andrew B. Chung Bible Study of the Day: Rape is Okay	18 Dec 2005 01:54:55 PM

On 18 Dec 2005 11:51:37 -0800, "The Last Conformist"
<andreasj@gmail.com> wrote:

Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:

I note there's no limit on how many girls one can marry this way.

The Bible loves polygamy. after all, when you massacre all the men
(Num 31:18), all those nubile young girls you raped have to be married
off!
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka

User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
Title: Re: Andrew B. Chung Bible Study of the Day: Rape is Okay	18 Dec 2005 12:25:27 PM

Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:

This is more just than current laws in the U.S. concerning statutory
rape where the teenage girl is consenting (and "they are discovered").
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/22/05) from 6 to 7 pm
EST:
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
how the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
Many Christmas blessings,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.

User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass"
Title: In Andrew B Chung's World, Elizabeth Smart Should be Married to Her Kidnapper	18 Dec 2005 01:33:21 PM

On 18 Dec 2005 10:25:27 -0800, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<nospam6@heartmdphd.com> wrote:

Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:

This is more just than current laws in the U.S. concerning statutory
rape where the teenage girl is consenting (and "they are discovered").

A list of "married" couples in Andrew B Chung's universe:

Elizabeth Smart and her kidnapper
Kelly McGellis and her rapist
Tori Amos and her rapist
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka

User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass"
Title: Re: Andrew B. Chung Bible Study of the Day: Rape is Okay	18 Dec 2005 12:34:05 PM

On 18 Dec 2005 10:25:27 -0800, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<nospam6@heartmdphd.com> wrote:

Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:

This is more just than current laws in the U.S. concerning statutory
rape where the teenage girl is consenting (and "they are discovered").

So not only do you think rape is okay, you're also for pedophilia?
Discuss.
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka

User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
Title: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/22/05)	18 Dec 2005 01:01:58 PM

Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:

On 18 Dec 2005 10:25:27 -0800, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<nospam6@heartmdphd.com> wrote:

Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:

This is more just than current laws in the U.S. concerning statutory
rape where the teenage girl is consenting (and "they are discovered").

So not only do you think rape is okay, you're also for pedophilia?

No.
Laws do not condone but rather they condemn. And so we would remain
condemned if it were not for LORD Jesus Christ:
http://www.HeartMDPhD.com/Christ.asp
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/22/05) from 6 to 7 pm
EST:
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
how the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
Many Christmas blessings,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.

User: ""
Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/22/05)	18 Dec 2005 01:07:08 PM

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:

On 18 Dec 2005 10:25:27 -0800, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<nospam6@heartmdphd.com> wrote:

Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:

This is more just than current laws in the U.S. concerning statutory
rape where the teenage girl is consenting (and "they are discovered").

So not only do you think rape is okay, you're also for pedophilia?

No.

Laws do not condone but rather they condemn. And so we would remain
condemned if it were not for LORD Jesus Christ:

Rock'em Sock'em Trollbots.
.

User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/22/05)	18 Dec 2005 01:25:36 PM

wrote:

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:

On 18 Dec 2005 10:25:27 -0800, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<nospam6@heartmdphd.com> wrote:

Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:

This is more just than current laws in the U.S. concerning statutory
rape where the teenage girl is consenting (and "they are discovered").

So not only do you think rape is okay, you're also for pedophilia?

No.

Laws do not condone but rather they condemn. And so we would remain
condemned if it were not for LORD Jesus Christ:

http://www.HeartMDPhD.com/Christ.asp

Rock'em Sock'em Trollbots.

Those who are not secure in the truth have not the strength to resist
the temptation to descend into namecalling.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/22/05) from 6 to 7 pm
EST:
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
how the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
Many Christmas blessings,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk.
.

User: "Sanitys little helper"
Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/22/05)	18 Dec 2005 02:36:23 PM

On 18 Dec 2005 11:25:36 -0800, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Those who are not secure in the truth have not the strength to resist
the temptation to descend into namecalling.

You will please note that I didn't so I confidently expect and require an
answer to my question: what exactly is it I, personally, am condemned of?
--
Eat, drink and be merry, for tomorrow, we eat, drink and be merry.
D Silverman FLAHN, SMLAHN
AA #2208
.

User: "Les Hellawell"
Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/22/05)	19 Dec 2005 06:29:37 AM

On 18 Dec 2005 11:01:58 -0800, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<nospam6@heartmdphd.com> wrote:

Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:

On 18 Dec 2005 10:25:27 -0800, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<nospam6@heartmdphd.com> wrote:

Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:

This is more just than current laws in the U.S. concerning statutory
rape where the teenage girl is consenting (and "they are discovered").

So not only do you think rape is okay, you're also for pedophilia?

No.

Laws do not condone but rather they condemn.

Laws do not condemn, you condemn yourself by transgressing
them and the people they are written to protect.
Les Hellawell
Greetings from:
YORKSHIRE The White Rose County
.

User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/22/05)	19 Dec 2005 06:59:20 AM

Les Hellawell wrote:

On 18 Dec 2005 11:01:58 -0800, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<nospam6@heartmdphd.com> wrote:

Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:

On 18 Dec 2005 10:25:27 -0800, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<nospam6@heartmdphd.com> wrote:

Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:

This is more just than current laws in the U.S. concerning statutory
rape where the teenage girl is consenting (and "they are discovered").

So not only do you think rape is okay, you're also for pedophilia?

No.

Laws do not condone but rather they condemn.

Laws do not condemn, you condemn yourself by transgressing
them and the people they are written to protect.

That would be correct only for those who are not walking with the LORD.
Thankfully, there is no condemnation for those who walk with Christ
Jesus (Romans 8:1-2)
http://www.HeartMDPhD.com/Christ.asp
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/22/05) from 6 to 7 pm
EST:
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
how the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
Many Christmas blessings,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.

User: "Sanitys little helper"
Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/22/05)	19 Dec 2005 08:50:13 AM

On 19 Dec 2005 04:59:20 -0800, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Les Hellawell wrote:

On 18 Dec 2005 11:01:58 -0800, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<nospam6@heartmdphd.com> wrote:

Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:

On 18 Dec 2005 10:25:27 -0800, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<nospam6@heartmdphd.com> wrote:

Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:

This is more just than current laws in the U.S. concerning statutory
rape where the teenage girl is consenting (and "they are discovered").

So not only do you think rape is okay, you're also for pedophilia?

No.

Laws do not condone but rather they condemn.

Laws do not condemn, you condemn yourself by transgressing
them and the people they are written to protect.

That would be correct only for those who are not walking with the LORD.

Thankfully, there is no condemnation for those who walk with Christ
Jesus (Romans 8:1-2)

So, you admit you're a crook, a twister, a liar and a quack, and
furthermore, you claim that all of this is OK because you have an imaginary
friend who lets you off.
Let me know if, and how, I have anything wrong.
.

User: "Sanitys little helper"
Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/22/05)	18 Dec 2005 02:34:23 PM

On 18 Dec 2005 11:01:58 -0800, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Laws do not condone but rather they condemn. And so we would remain
condemned if it were not for LORD Jesus Christ:

So, mr Knowitall, what exactly is it that I, personally, am condemned of?
Be extremely careful how you answer this.
--
Eat, drink and be merry, for tomorrow, we eat, drink and be merry.
D Silverman FLAHN, SMLAHN
AA #2208
.

User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/22/05)	18 Dec 2005 06:24:41 PM

Sanity's little helper wrote:

On 18 Dec 2005 11:01:58 -0800, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Laws do not condone but rather they condemn. And so we would remain
condemned if it were not for LORD Jesus Christ:

http://www.HeartMDPhD.com/Christ.asp

So, mr Knowitall

It seems you are confusing me with the Person with Whom I am walking.
This Person is the LORD Almighty GOD, Who is indeed omniscent.
Yes, the LORD is also omnipotent:
http://makeashorterlink.com/?D3DE219AA
The LORD is also the truth:
http://makeashorterlink.com/?P2264129A
The way to the LORD is straight and narrow:
http://makeashorterlink.com/?A2642108A
You will be in my prayers, dear neighbor, whom I love, in LORD Christ's
holy name.
May you reject your pride and accept Him as your personal LORD and
Savior, someday, so that you too will have eternal life and the
fascinating riches of His everlasting kingdom.
Here's how:
http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129
Please note that GOD truly made this special link describing that He is
the great "I am" and that His message is as simple as the number 2
which is a number between 1 to 9 and reminds us of His 2 commandments,
the 2 arms of the cross, the 2nd part of the Trinity, the 2 finger sign
of the Prince of Peace [who remains *V*ictorious over death and satan],
and the 2PD-OMER Approach. Let it not ever be written that Christ did
not make His presence known here on Usenet :-)
Also, note that Exodus 16:16 continues to remind us that 16 oz plus 16
oz makes 2 pounds, which is "a certain measure of weight," which is
what "omer" literally means in Hebrew.
Enter the 2PD-OMER Approach, which can "cure" metabolic syndrome (MetS)
thereby bringing this thread back on topic for SMC :-)
http://www.HeartMDPhD.com/wtloss.asp
http://www.HeartMDPhD.com/press.asp
You may hear me speak about the 2PD-OMER Approach in person and meet
others who have been using this WOE here:
http://www.TheHealthFair.com
You may also choose to have me speak to your group or organization
about the 2PD-OMER Approach in person for the usual and customary
speaker's fee of US$30,000.00 made as a tax-deductible contribution to
TheWellnessFoundation.com (it remains my choice to not profit
personally from the 2PD-OMER Approach):
http://www.TheWellnessFoundation.com
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/22/05) from 6 to 7 pm
EST:
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
how the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
Many Christmas blessings,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.

User: "Jim-Poncin"
Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/22/05)	19 Dec 2005 12:22:13 PM

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <nospam7@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:1134951881.129727.226740@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...

Sanity's little helper wrote:

On 18 Dec 2005 11:01:58 -0800, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Laws do not condone but rather they condemn. And so we would remain
condemned if it were not for LORD Jesus Christ:

http://www.HeartMDPhD.com/Christ.asp

So, mr Knowitall

It seems you are confusing me with the Person with Whom I am walking.

This Person is the LORD Almighty GOD, Who is indeed omniscent.

Fine. Then produce this jesus/mary/god you're walking around with, so that
it can prove its existence and powers.
If you can't do that, then quit posting this rubbish and go away.
.

User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/22/05)	19 Dec 2005 05:20:07 PM

Jim-Poncin wrote:

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <nospam7@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:1134951881.129727.226740@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...

Sanity's little helper wrote:

On 18 Dec 2005 11:01:58 -0800, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Laws do not condone but rather they condemn. And so we would remain
condemned if it were not for LORD Jesus Christ:

http://www.HeartMDPhD.com/Christ.asp

So, mr Knowitall

It seems you are confusing me with the Person with Whom I am walking.

This Person is the LORD Almighty GOD, Who is indeed omniscent.

Fine. Then produce this jesus/mary/god you're walking around with, so that
it can prove its existence and powers.

The LORD is my Maker and not the other way around.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/22/05) from 6 to 7 pm
EST:
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
how the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
Many Christmas blessings,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.

User: "Jim-Poncin"
Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/22/05)	19 Dec 2005 07:08:07 PM

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <nospam7@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:1135034407.660127.6430@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Jim-Poncin wrote:

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <nospam7@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:1134951881.129727.226740@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...

Sanity's little helper wrote:

On 18 Dec 2005 11:01:58 -0800, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Laws do not condone but rather they condemn. And so we would remain
condemned if it were not for LORD Jesus Christ:

http://www.HeartMDPhD.com/Christ.asp

So, mr Knowitall

It seems you are confusing me with the Person with Whom I am walking.

This Person is the LORD Almighty GOD, Who is indeed omniscent.

Fine. Then produce this jesus/mary/god you're walking around with, so
that
it can prove its existence and powers.

The LORD is my Maker and not the other way around.

Irrelevant reply.
Again, produce this jesus/mary/god you're walking around with, so that
it can prove its existence and powers.
If you can't do that, then quit posting this rubbish and go away.
.

User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/22/05)	19 Dec 2005 07:13:07 PM

Jim-Poncin wrote:

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <nospam7@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:1135034407.660127.6430@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Jim-Poncin wrote:

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <nospam7@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:1134951881.129727.226740@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...

Sanity's little helper wrote:

On 18 Dec 2005 11:01:58 -0800, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Laws do not condone but rather they condemn. And so we would remain
condemned if it were not for LORD Jesus Christ:

http://www.HeartMDPhD.com/Christ.asp

So, mr Knowitall

It seems you are confusing me with the Person with Whom I am walking.

This Person is the LORD Almighty GOD, Who is indeed omniscent.

Fine. Then produce this jesus/mary/god you're walking around with, so
that
it can prove its existence and powers.

The LORD is my Maker and not the other way around.

Irrelevant reply.

The truth is never irrelevant.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/22/05) from 6 to 7 pm
EST:
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
how the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
Many Christmas blessings,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.

User: "Jim-Poncin"
Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/22/05)	19 Dec 2005 10:45:07 PM

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <nospam7@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:1135041187.219124.150690@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

The truth is never irrelevant.

You didn't say anything true.
Again, if it exists, produce this jesus/mary/god you say you're walking
around with, so that
it can prove its existence and powers.
If you can't do that, then quit posting this rubbish and go away.
.

User: "Pramesh Rutajit"
Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/22/05)	19 Dec 2005 03:09:42 AM

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Sanity's little helper wrote:

On 18 Dec 2005 11:01:58 -0800, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Laws do not condone but rather they condemn. And so we would remain
condemned if it were not for LORD Jesus Christ:

http://www.HeartMDPhD.com/Christ.asp

So, mr Knowitall

It seems you are confusing me with the Person with Whom I am walking.

Take a photo and post it to the group.
--
Pramesh Rutajit -

- remove tongue to reply.
.

User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/22/05)	19 Dec 2005 04:28:04 AM

Pramesh Rutajit wrote:

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Sanity's little helper wrote:

On 18 Dec 2005 11:01:58 -0800, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Laws do not condone but rather they condemn. And so we would remain
condemned if it were not for LORD Jesus Christ:

http://www.HeartMDPhD.com/Christ.asp

So, mr Knowitall

It seems you are confusing me with the Person with Whom I am walking.

Take a photo and post it to the group.

It seems you are confusing these text-based USENET newsgroups with the
more picture-oriented ones that you frequent.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/22/05) from 6 to 7 pm
EST:
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
how the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
Many Christmas blessings,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.

User: "Pramesh Rutajit"
Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/22/05)	19 Dec 2005 10:31:30 PM

Andrew B. Chung, who "plays" with an invisible friend, wrote:

Pramesh Rutajit wrote:

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Sanity's little helper wrote:

On 18 Dec 2005 11:01:58 -0800, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Laws do not condone but rather they condemn. And so we would remain
condemned if it were not for LORD Jesus Christ:

http://www.HeartMDPhD.com/Christ.asp

So, mr Knowitall

It seems you are confusing me with the Person with Whom I am walking.

Take a photo and post it to the group.

It seems you are confusing these text-based USENET newsgroups with the
more picture-oriented ones that you frequent.

That invisible dude you "walk with" is a pervert? That's explains some
things. What newsgroup did you post the pictures too? An appropriate one
I hope. I read in the "good book" that he got a 13 year old girl named
Mary pregnant - that's rape in most enlightened countries.
Now, go back to playing with yourself - your "invisible friend" that is.
--
Pramesh Rutajit -

- remove tongue to reply.
.

User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/22/05)	20 Dec 2005 11:45:03 PM

Pramesh Rutajit wrote:

Andrew B. Chung, who walks with Christ, wrote:

Pramesh Rutajit wrote:

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Sanity's little helper wrote:

On 18 Dec 2005 11:01:58 -0800, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Laws do not condone but rather they condemn. And so we would remain
condemned if it were not for LORD Jesus Christ:

http://www.HeartMDPhD.com/Christ.asp

So, mr Knowitall

It seems you are confusing me with the Person with Whom I am walking.

Take a photo and post it to the group.

It seems you are confusing these text-based USENET newsgroups with the
more picture-oriented ones that you frequent.

That invisible dude you "walk with"

Christ is not invisible.

is a pervert?

Walking is not a perversion unlike your activities outside the
text-based USENET NGs.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/22/05) from 6 to 7 pm
EST:
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
how the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
Many Christmas blessings,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.

User: "Pramesh Rutajit"
Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/22/05)	24 Dec 2005 10:50:05 PM

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Pramesh Rutajit wrote:

Andrew B. Chung, who walks with Christ, wrote:

Pramesh Rutajit wrote:

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Sanity's little helper wrote:

On 18 Dec 2005 11:01:58 -0800, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Laws do not condone but rather they condemn. And so we would
remain condemned if it were not for LORD Jesus Christ:

http://www.HeartMDPhD.com/Christ.asp

So, mr Knowitall

It seems you are confusing me with the Person with Whom I am
walking.

Take a photo and post it to the group.

It seems you are confusing these text-based USENET newsgroups with the
more picture-oriented ones that you frequent.

That invisible dude you "walk with"

Christ is not invisible.

I met a wino once that said he was Jesus Christ. Perhaps you are talking
about that guy. Mythological beings are not real. Grow up. Your
invisibile friend never existed except in your mind.

is a pervert?

Walking is not a perversion unlike your activities outside the
text-based USENET NGs.

It was you that indicated that one could see images of your Christ in
perveted newsgroups somewhere. Would that be the christian.group.sex
section?

--
Pramesh Rutajit -

- remove tongue to reply.
.

User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
Title: Happy Birthday LORD Jesus Christ :-))	25 Dec 2005 05:28:06 AM

Pramesh Rutajit wrote:

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Pramesh Rutajit wrote:

Andrew B. Chung, who walks with Christ, wrote:

Pramesh Rutajit wrote:

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Sanity's little helper wrote:

On 18 Dec 2005 11:01:58 -0800, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Laws do not condone but rather they condemn. And so we would
remain condemned if it were not for LORD Jesus Christ:

http://www.HeartMDPhD.com/Christ.asp

So, mr Knowitall

It seems you are confusing me with the Person with Whom I am
walking.

Take a photo and post it to the group.

It seems you are confusing these text-based USENET newsgroups with the
more picture-oriented ones that you frequent.

That invisible dude you "walk with"

Christ is not invisible.

I met a wino once that said he was Jesus Christ. Perhaps you are talking
about that guy.

No.

Mythological beings are not real.

Correct.

Grow up.

I am fully grown.

Your
invisibile friend never existed except in your mind.

Not to those who are walking with HIM.
May the LORD bless the gifts and the givers and all that is done in HIS
name this day which HE has made and set aside for celebrating HIS birth
as the Son of Man, in Jesus' most precious and holy name.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/29/05) from 6 to 7 pm
EST:
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
how the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
Many Christmas blessings,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.

User: "Lord Jesus Christ"
Title: Re: Happy Birthday LORD Jesus Christ :-))	25 Dec 2005 05:39:56 AM

On 25 Dec 2005 03:28:06 -0800, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

I am fully grown.

Alright, already!
.

User: "Sanitys little helper"
Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/22/05)	19 Dec 2005 08:41:46 AM

On 19 Dec 2005 02:28:04 -0800, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

It seems you are confusing these text-based USENET newsgroups with the
more picture-oriented ones that you frequent.

Put it on a blog and post a link. Oh! and answer the fucking question, your
imaginary friend doesn't want to.
--
Eat, drink and be merry, for tomorrow, we eat, drink and be merry.
D Silverman FLAHN, SMLAHN
AA #2208
.

Page 1 of 2

Post reply

Andrew B Chung Bible Study of the Day: It's Okay to Sell Your Daughter Into Slavery (Exo 21:7)
Andrew B Chung Bible Study of the Day: It's Okay to Kill Babies (Num 33:4)
Bonus Andrew B Chung Bible Study of the Day: Polygamy is Okay! (1 Samuel 1:2)
Andrew B. Chung Bible Study of the Day: It's Okay to Kill Babies
Andrew B Chung Bible Study of the Day: Genocide is Okay! (Joshua 6:21)
Andrew B Chung Bible Study of the Day: Genocide is Okay! (Obadiah 1:8-9)
Andrew B Chung Bible Study of the Day: It's Okay to Kill People Who Worships Differently! (Jer 16:10-11)
Rightwing Pundit: Perfectly Okay to Lie

Okay you win
Another GI Killed By Bush's Big Lie, As Chickenhawk Cowards Pretend Everything is Okay
Okay, this is *way* too much fun...
Okay: Vomit!
Um. Okay. Interesting email.
Why Do Neocons Think Rape Is Okay?
Chickenhawk Gactimus Too ***** Go to Iraq Himself, But Thinks Raping Women is Okay

NEWER

pg.3585 pg.2749 pg.2106 pg.1612 pg.1232 pg.940 pg.716 pg.544 pg.412 pg.311 pg.234 pg.175 pg.130 pg.96 pg.70 pg.50 pg.35 pg.24 pg.16 pg.10 pg.6 pg.3 pg.1

OLDER