| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
| Date: |
12 Apr 2006 09:44:40 AM |
| Object: |
Ann Coulter Caught Lying (GOP=Voter Fraud) |
http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00002682.htm
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -2360 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
-----
"Ahhhhhh, yessssssss, ummmmmmm - Alito, Alito, Alito"
-duke (duckgumbo@cox.net), aka PedophilEarl J Weber, 59
year old mateless, heirless biological failure
of Afton Oaks Apartment, Baton Rouge,who pussied
out of the Vietnam draft, showing his gay side
despite his avowed anti-gay bigotry
Contact duke's priest and ask
him why duke is such a racist:
http://www.stpatrickbr.org/
Father Gerard "Jerry" Martin
stpatrickbr<AT>bellsouth<DOT>net
Saint Patrick Catholic Church
12424 Brogdon Lane
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70816
.
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Another liberal becomes the latest victim to Osprey - Bye bye DanielSan |
14 Apr 2006 06:03:55 PM |
|
|
On 14 Apr 2006 06:32:48 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
John Baker wrote:
On 13 Apr 2006 22:59:23 -0700, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
And there you go folks, another liberal bites the dust. Bye bye!!!
Oh, hardly. You couldn't win a debate with a Philodendron.
You are more than welcome to come off the sidelines and see if you can
show the threat of violence he claimed I made.
It's already been shown, and you've been tapdancing around it ever since.
What's that? You have nothing to say?
That's what I thought. Stay on the sidelines and just cheer.
Baker's right - a philodendron could outfox you
And yet you never could outfox me, so a philodendron is more
intelligent than you. Go figure.
And Bobby tells another whopper...
...and irony completely escapes
you, since you only wasted 50K or so of disk space in two posts (of which a
whopping hundred bytes or so were your own words) in which you did just what
you deride others for doing.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 4, Omaha 1 (April 11)
NEXT GAME: Friday, April 14 vs. Omaha, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Another liberal becomes the latest victim to Osprey - Bye byeDanielSan |
14 Apr 2006 01:08:17 AM |
|
|
osprey wrote:
<snip bluster and bravado>
And there you go folks, another liberal bites the dust. Bye bye!!!
Two men are racing. The guy in the blue shirt crosses the finish line
several laps ahead of the guy in the red. The man in the blue shirt
sits on the risers while the man in red shirt doesn't even finish the race.
The man in the red shirt proclaims victory.
Another typical response from osprey and folks like himself. Proclaim
victory even when you didn't even finish.
I ended the conversation myself because osprey did not want to debate.
He chose to attack me, insult me, and profess outstanding ignorance in
even the most basics of societal discourse.
Sad, really, but not unexpected.
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Torture has never been a reliable means of *
* extracting information.... One wonders why it *
* is still practiced." --Jean-Luc Picard *
****************************************************
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Another liberal becomes the latest victim to Osprey - Bye bye DanielSan |
14 Apr 2006 01:24:07 AM |
|
|
DanielSan wrote:
osprey wrote:
<snip bluster and bravado>
And there you go folks, another liberal bites the dust. Bye bye!!!
Two men are racing. The guy in the blue shirt crosses the finish line
several laps ahead of the guy in the red. The man in the blue shirt
sits on the risers while the man in red shirt doesn't even finish the race.
What does this have to do with the fact that you lied when you claimed
I threatened someone?
The man in the red shirt proclaims victory.
You claimed I threatened someone, I challanged you to show where this
threat was, you couldn't show it. Instead of just apologizing for your
reading error and lack of understanding of the English language, you
chose to run off.
Another typical response from osprey and folks like himself. Proclaim
victory even when you didn't even finish.
We can go right back to it again if you would like.
Care to show me where I threatened anyone?
I ended the conversation myself because
You couldn't show any threat.
osprey did not want to debate.
He chose to attack me, insult me, and profess outstanding ignorance in
even the most basics of societal discourse.
asking you to back up your assertion is attacking and an insult?
You are the one who can't understand what a threat means. And you
couldn't back up your assertion; however, I am willing to try again.
Show me where I threatened the person you claimed I threatened.
As far as "attacking and insulting" I can easily show the first post
you made in which YOU CLEARLY started with attacking and insulting.
Would you like me to show that post?
From: DanielSan <daniel-...@myrealbox.com>
Message-ID: <443f23bd$0$15445$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com>
Typical. Threats of violence from folks like osprey. The study was
true. Conservatives are just grown up "spoiled brats."
------------------------------------------------------------
Now DanielSan, you can clearly see that it was YOU who started out with
the insulting and attacking. First you lied by claiming I threatened
violence. I clearly did not. Then you go on attacking conservatives.
Now, if you are going to be thinned skinned, lie, and act like this you
were better off just running off like you did. Don't come back for
another embarrassing round. Just go sit down and lick your wounds.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rick" |
|
| Title: Re: Another liberal becomes the latest victim to Osprey - Bye bye DanielSan |
14 Apr 2006 01:33:01 AM |
|
|
osprey wrote in message
<1144995847.305704.120110@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>...
DanielSan wrote:
[snip]
You claimed I threatened someone, I challanged you to show where this
threat was, you couldn't show it.
All you really need to do is claim you were being facetious. That's the sort
of evasive stunt he likes to pull. It's surprising he hasn't done it in this
thread.
- Rick
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Another liberal becomes the latest victim to Osprey - Bye byeDanielSan |
14 Apr 2006 01:45:44 AM |
|
|
osprey wrote:
DanielSan wrote:
osprey wrote:
<snip bluster and bravado>
And there you go folks, another liberal bites the dust. Bye bye!!!
Two men are racing. The guy in the blue shirt crosses the finish line
several laps ahead of the guy in the red. The man in the blue shirt
sits on the risers while the man in red shirt doesn't even finish the race.
What does this have to do with the fact that you lied when you claimed
I threatened someone?
I have already showed, countless times, that "Say that to my face" is
construed, in rational circles, at least, as a threat.
The man in the red shirt proclaims victory.
You claimed I threatened someone, I challanged you to show where this
threat was, you couldn't show it.
Another typical response: Ignore what was give then say that the person
never gave it.
I can't believe I even HAVE to explain it, but here we go...
"Say that to my face" intimates that the person you are talking to is
unable to have the bravery to say it to the person's face. The "threat"
comes into play in the challenging nature of the phrase. It is
synonymous with poking your finger into someone's chest.
Instead of just apologizing for your
reading error and lack of understanding of the English language, you
chose to run off.
Run off nothing. You aren't even communicating lucidly.
Another typical response from osprey and folks like himself. Proclaim
victory even when you didn't even finish.
We can go right back to it again if you would like.
Care to show me where I threatened anyone?
No. I have done it at least a dozen times now, but, like I expected,
you refuse to even acknowledge it.
I ended the conversation myself because
You couldn't show any threat.
Acknowledgement refusal noted.
osprey did not want to debate.
He chose to attack me, insult me, and profess outstanding ignorance in
even the most basics of societal discourse.
asking you to back up your assertion is attacking and an insult?
No.
You are the one who can't understand what a threat means. And you
couldn't back up your assertion; however, I am willing to try again.
Show me where I threatened the person you claimed I threatened.
I have done so about a dozen times already.
Here, I'll spell it out for you:
"S-A-Y T-H-A-T T-O M-Y F-A-C-E" C-O-N-S-T-I-T-U-T-E-S A T-H-R-E-A-T.
Does that help?
As far as "attacking and insulting" I can easily show the first post
you made in which YOU CLEARLY started with attacking and insulting.
Actually, _YOU_ are the one that started with the insults.
Would you like me to show that post?
Would this before or after you said "Let's evaluate your reading
comprehension"?
From: DanielSan <daniel-...@myrealbox.com>
Message-ID: <443f23bd$0$15445$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com>
Typical. Threats of violence from folks like osprey. The study was
true. Conservatives are just grown up "spoiled brats."
Opinion of your actions are not insults.
------------------------------------------------------------
Now DanielSan, you can clearly see that it was YOU who started out with
the insulting and attacking.
Nope. I was relating to the story posted and how it appeared that you
were showing your childishness when it comes to the way you debate.
When talking to Mitchell, your tone reflected childishness. "I will
rephrase to give you your little victory." That is infantile and shows
a lack of respect to your interlocutor.
First you lied by claiming I threatened
violence.
Where did I say that you threatened "violence"? Threats do not always
extend to physical violence. Sometimes, it can also be regarded as a
challenge.
I clearly did not.
"Denial" is not just a river in Egypt.
Then you go on attacking conservatives.
Not unlike you've done in the past on liberals.
Now, if you are going to be thinned skinned,
Which I'm not.
lie,
Which I don't.
and act like this
Act like this? Like what?
you
were better off just running off like you did.
I don't run off.
Don't come back for
another embarrassing round.
Run away! Run away!
Just go sit down and lick your wounds.
You seem to believe that you've wounded me. Interesting response.
Possibly an extension of "proclaim victory even though you didn't
finish" but I'm not sure.
Either way, you refuse to acknowledge even the most basic societal
agreements of language. There is nothing I can say or do that will
bring you out of this self-induced confinement. You will need to do
that yourself.
When you have the ability to agree on what phrases actually mean, get
back to me.
Until then, I've a life to get to. :-)
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Torture has never been a reliable means of *
* extracting information.... One wonders why it *
* is still practiced." --Jean-Luc Picard *
****************************************************
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Another liberal becomes the latest victim to Osprey - Bye bye DanielSan |
14 Apr 2006 03:46:48 AM |
|
|
DanielSan wrote:
osprey wrote:
DanielSan wrote:
osprey wrote:
<snip bluster and bravado>
And there you go folks, another liberal bites the dust. Bye bye!!!
Two men are racing. The guy in the blue shirt crosses the finish line
several laps ahead of the guy in the red. The man in the blue shirt
sits on the risers while the man in red shirt doesn't even finish the race.
What does this have to do with the fact that you lied when you claimed
I threatened someone?
I have already showed, countless times, that "Say that to my face" is
construed, in rational circles, at least, as a threat.
Only if you are paranoid.
The man in the red shirt proclaims victory.
You claimed I threatened someone, I challanged you to show where this
threat was, you couldn't show it.
Another typical response: Ignore what was give then say that the person
never gave it.
You haven't given any evidence I threatened anyone. You have shown you
are paranoid.
I can't believe I even HAVE to explain it, but here we go...
"Say that to my face" intimates that the person you are talking to is
unable to have the bravery to say it to the person's face.
Still no threat.
The "threat"
comes into play in the challenging nature of the phrase.
No, it's simply a challenge..not a threat. You are paranoid.
It is
synonymous with poking your finger into someone's chest.
No, that's a poke.
Instead of just apologizing for your
reading error and lack of understanding of the English language, you
chose to run off.
Run off nothing. You aren't even communicating lucidly.
You are just rambling and trying to move the goalpost. You can't just
be honest and admit that YOU made an inference, and YOU are wrong. I am
not threatening anyone.
Another typical response from osprey and folks like himself. Proclaim
victory even when you didn't even finish.
We can go right back to it again if you would like.
Care to show me where I threatened anyone?
No. I have done it at least a dozen times now, but, like I expected,
you refuse to even acknowledge it.
No, I am just simply saying you are not showing any threat.
I ended the conversation myself because
You couldn't show any threat.
Acknowledgement refusal noted.
Acknowledgement of denial noted.
osprey did not want to debate.
He chose to attack me, insult me, and profess outstanding ignorance in
even the most basics of societal discourse.
asking you to back up your assertion is attacking and an insult?
No.
You are the one who can't understand what a threat means. And you
couldn't back up your assertion; however, I am willing to try again.
Show me where I threatened the person you claimed I threatened.
I have done so about a dozen times already.
Once would be a good start.
Here, I'll spell it out for you:
"S-A-Y T-H-A-T T-O M-Y F-A-C-E" C-O-N-S-T-I-T-U-T-E-S A T-H-R-E-A-T.
N-O I-T D-O-E-S-N-T Y-O-U A-R-E P-A-R-A-N-O-I-D
Does that help?
Yes, it shows me just how paranoid you are.
As far as "attacking and insulting" I can easily show the first post
you made in which YOU CLEARLY started with attacking and insulting.
Actually, _YOU_ are the one that started with the insults.
Nope, you initiated this little ***** session.
Would you like me to show that post?
Would this before or after you said "Let's evaluate your reading
comprehension"?
Right, because you misread what I was saying.
From: DanielSan <daniel-...@myrealbox.com>
Message-ID: <443f23bd$0$15445$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com>
Typical. Threats of violence from folks like osprey. The study was
true. Conservatives are just grown up "spoiled brats."
Opinion of your actions are not insults.
Oh my, what a cop-out.
------------------------------------------------------------
Now DanielSan, you can clearly see that it was YOU who started out with
the insulting and attacking.
Nope. I was relating to the story posted and how it appeared that you
were showing your childishness when it comes to the way you debate.
When talking to Mitchell, your tone reflected childishness. "I will
rephrase to give you your little victory." That is infantile and shows
a lack of respect to your interlocutor.
Nope, just giving him what liberals like to think they have.
First you lied by claiming I threatened
violence.
Where did I say that you threatened "violence"?
Did you not read what you said????
From: DanielSan <daniel-...@myrealbox.com>
Message-ID: <443f23bd$0$15445$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com>
"Threats of violence from folks like osprey."
Threats do not always
extend to physical violence.
Read what you said.
Sometimes, it can also be regarded as a
challenge.
Then it's a challenge, not a threat. Read the definition of threat
please.
I clearly did not.
"Denial" is not just a river in Egypt.
Lack of effort to learn what threat means noted.
Then you go on attacking conservatives.
Not unlike you've done in the past on liberals.
Where?
Now, if you are going to be thinned skinned,
Which I'm not.
Yes you are.
lie,
Which I don't.
You did.
and act like this
Act like this? Like what?
Like a paranoid child.
you
were better off just running off like you did.
I don't run off.
You did.
Don't come back for
another embarrassing round.
Run away! Run away!
I am trying to catch up to you, you are running to fast.
Just go sit down and lick your wounds.
You seem to believe that you've wounded me.
I have.
Interesting response.
Possibly an extension of "proclaim victory even though you didn't
finish" but I'm not sure.
Either way, you refuse to acknowledge even the most basic societal
agreements of language.
I didn't threaten, you failed to read the definition of threat.
There is nothing I can say or do that will
bring you out of this self-induced confinement.
You could start by picking up a dictionary.
You will need to do
that yourself.
When you have the ability to agree on what phrases actually mean, get
back to me.
When you have the ability to go to www.dictionary.com and look up
threat and you show me where anywhere in my statement I threatened
anyone, get back to me.
Until then, I've a life to get to. :-)
Uh huh, see ya.
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Torture has never been a reliable means of *
* extracting information.... One wonders why it *
* is still practiced." --Jean-Luc Picard *
****************************************************
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Another liberal becomes the latest victim to Osprey - Bye byeDanielSan |
14 Apr 2006 07:37:34 AM |
|
|
osprey wrote:
DanielSan wrote:
osprey wrote:
<snip>
This is the only thing I care about referencing and this is the last
time I shall participate in this thread.
First you lied by claiming I threatened
violence.
Where did I say that you threatened "violence"?
Did you not read what you said????
You apparently didn't.
From: DanielSan <daniel-...@myrealbox.com>
Message-ID: <443f23bd$0$15445$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com>
"Threats of violence from folks like osprey."
I said "folks *LIKE* osprey", not osprey himself. Let's evaluate your
reading comprehension.
But, if you want your little victory, then please, go celebrate. No
skin off my *****.
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Torture has never been a reliable means of *
* extracting information.... One wonders why it *
* is still practiced." --Jean-Luc Picard *
****************************************************
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Another liberal becomes the latest victim to Osprey - Bye bye DanielSan |
14 Apr 2006 08:31:56 AM |
|
|
DanielSan wrote:
osprey wrote:
DanielSan wrote:
osprey wrote:
<snip>
This is the only thing I care about referencing and this is the last
time I shall participate in this thread.
First you lied by claiming I threatened
violence.
Where did I say that you threatened "violence"?
Did you not read what you said????
You apparently didn't.
From: DanielSan <daniel-...@myrealbox.com>
Message-ID: <443f23bd$0$15445$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com>
"Threats of violence from folks like osprey."
I said "folks *LIKE* osprey", not osprey himself. Let's evaluate your
reading comprehension.
ROFL....TALK ABOUT TRYING TO WEASLE OUT...BOY YOU ARE A JOKE!!!
But, if you want your little victory, then please, go celebrate. No
skin off my *****.
You aren't worth any celebration, my work is done with you. You lied
and you can't even be man enough to just admit it. I didn't actually
expect you to.
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Torture has never been a reliable means of *
* extracting information.... One wonders why it *
* is still practiced." --Jean-Luc Picard *
****************************************************
--
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H" |
|
| Title: Re: Another liberal becomes the latest victim to Osprey - Bye bye DanielSan |
14 Apr 2006 05:45:57 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 23:08:17 -0700, DanielSan
<daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote:
osprey wrote:
<snip bluster and bravado>
And there you go folks, another liberal bites the dust. Bye bye!!!
Two men are racing. The guy in the blue shirt crosses the finish line
several laps ahead of the guy in the red. The man in the blue shirt
sits on the risers while the man in red shirt doesn't even finish the race.
The man in the red shirt proclaims victory.
Another typical response from osprey and folks like himself. Proclaim
victory even when you didn't even finish.
I ended the conversation myself because osprey did not want to debate.
He chose to attack me, insult me, and profess outstanding ignorance in
even the most basics of societal discourse.
Sad, really, but not unexpected.
More like typical for him, actually. He'll be declaring 'victory' some
more now.
---
I contend we are both atheists - I just believe in
one fewer god than you do.
When you understand why you reject all other gods,
you will understand why I reject yours as well.
- Stephen F. Roberts
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter Caught Lying (GOP=Voter Fraud) |
14 Apr 2006 01:06:26 AM |
|
|
DanielSan wrote:
osprey wrote:
Mitchell Holman wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in
news:1144980716.844934.194720@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com:
Mitchell Holman wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in news:1144970545.332027.152690
@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com:
Mitchell Holman wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in
news:1144955124.155018.268250@t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Mitchell Holman wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in
news:1144950781.021399.112800
@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Mitchell Holman wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in
news:1144873126.704984.224070 @z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
Geoff wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1144854351.542235.249250@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com..
.
Slo wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****
wrote:
http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00002682.htm
Brad was just on the Stephanie Miller Show and said that
Coulter refused to fill in a gender box for either male
or female. Things
that
make you go, "hmmmmmm...."
What kind of a mind would go "hmmmm..." to something like
that?
What
law says you have to fill in a gender box?
Methinks he was wondering what gender Coulter is. Ever see
the Adam's apple on that *****?
I don't really go around looking for Adam's apple's on
people.
Besides, who cares?
Her choosing not to select what sex to put down means
nothing.
Coulter said women shouldn't vote.
What does that have to do with her choosing not to select what
sex
to
put down?
I already know your intollerance towards conservatives, so I am
not interested in your bigoted comments and/or propaganda.
Coulter voted.
Good for her, so should everyone who can. But what does that
have
to
do with her not chooosing to select what sex she is?
Therefore, Coulter is either a man or a hypocrite.
Because she chose not to put down her sex? You probably
actually believe that, you are dumb enough to.
Which is it?
The fact that she didn't have to and she made a statement. We
are not required to put down what our sex is, our age, our
race, and/or our sexual orientation.
Actually, you ARE reguired to put down your
date of birth, ergo your age.
Actually, you are NOT and I happen to know this because I just got
finished asking a human resource manager this just a week ago in
one
of
my classes.
Reference the facts:
http://election.dos.state.fl.us/regtovote/webappform.pdf
READ THE FACTS: SHE DOES NOT HAVE TO GIVE HER GENDER!!!!
READ YOUR OWN SOURCE
They can NOT discriminate against you, if you don't
wish to put down your age. The ONLY exceptions are jobs that do
have age limits, such as military and law enforcement.
Here is the Florida Voter Registration application.
http://election.dos.state.fl.us/regtovote/webappform.pdf
Please note line #5 (date of birth).
Please note line #14 (gender)
Take note: It says black boxes must be filled out. Box 14 is not
black.
But line #5 IS.
Contrary to your claim, date of birth is REQUIRED.
And I said earlier there are some exceptions when age is required.
You lying little *****.
No, I am not lying at all. There are EXCEPTIONS WHEN AGE IS REQUIRED.
NOT ALL APPLICATIONS REQUIRE YOU TO GIVE AN AGE.
Read the sentence above the "Reference the facts"
like above.
You SPECIFICALLY denied that a date of birth is
required with your "Actually you are not" sentence.
Well for your satisfaction, I will rephrase that and give you your
little victory. You are not always required to give your date of birth
on all forms though. There are exceptions. You finally got a little
victory, congratulations..go celebrate.
And now you are backpeddling?
You aren't an osprey, you are a weasel.
When you can come out from behind your keyboard and say that to my
face, then you might get some respect.
Typical. Threats of violence from folks like osprey.
What threat? Let's evaluate your reading comprehension.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Miriam Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter Caught Lying (GOP=Voter Fraud) |
13 Apr 2006 11:34:32 PM |
|
|
osprey LIED:
My
"One last note: I am very surprised at your reaction especially after
just a few short months ago I provided a copy of my DD214 Right in
box 18...1st line it says... SERVED 2 AUG 90 TO 1 OCT 94 IN SUPPORT
OF OPERATION DESERT SHIELD/STORM and in box 13 NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE
MEDAL Funny how you have selective memory, why? Yes, I served in combat
during Desert Storm."
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.abortion/msg/38f5de5691243868?dmode=source&hl=en
"Fine, if you want to play on words...no I was not in actual "combat" "
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/db12fe6b6ec66a35?dmode=source&hl=en
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Miriam Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter Caught Lying (GOP=Voter Fraud) |
13 Apr 2006 11:33:45 PM |
|
|
osprey LIED:
I
"One last note: I am very surprised at your reaction especially after
just a few short months ago I provided a copy of my DD214 Right in
box 18...1st line it says... SERVED 2 AUG 90 TO 1 OCT 94 IN SUPPORT
OF OPERATION DESERT SHIELD/STORM and in box 13 NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE
MEDAL Funny how you have selective memory, why? Yes, I served in combat
during Desert Storm."
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.abortion/msg/38f5de5691243868?dmode=source&hl=en
"Fine, if you want to play on words...no I was not in actual "combat" "
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/db12fe6b6ec66a35?dmode=source&hl=en
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter Caught Lying (GOP=Voter Fraud) |
13 Apr 2006 02:27:53 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:21:10 -0500, Mitchell Holman
<ta2eeneNoEmail@comcast.com> wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in
news:1144955124.155018.268250@t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Mitchell Holman wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in news:1144950781.021399.112800
@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Mitchell Holman wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in
news:1144873126.704984.224070 @z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
Geoff wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1144854351.542235.249250@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
Slo wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00002682.htm
Brad was just on the Stephanie Miller Show and said that
Coulter refused to fill in a gender box for either male or
female. Things
that
make you go, "hmmmmmm...."
What kind of a mind would go "hmmmm..." to something like that?
What
law says you have to fill in a gender box?
Methinks he was wondering what gender Coulter is. Ever see the
Adam's apple on that *****?
I don't really go around looking for Adam's apple's on people.
Besides, who cares?
Her choosing not to select what sex to put down means nothing.
Coulter said women shouldn't vote.
What does that have to do with her choosing not to select what sex to
put down?
I already know your intollerance towards conservatives, so I am not
interested in your bigoted comments and/or propaganda.
Coulter voted.
Good for her, so should everyone who can. But what does that have to
do with her not chooosing to select what sex she is?
Therefore, Coulter is either a man or a hypocrite.
Because she chose not to put down her sex? You probably actually
believe that, you are dumb enough to.
Which is it?
The fact that she didn't have to and she made a statement. We are
not required to put down what our sex is, our age, our race, and/or
our sexual orientation.
Actually, you ARE reguired to put down your
date of birth, ergo your age.
Actually, you are NOT and I happen to know this because I just got
finished asking a human resource manager this just a week ago in one of
my classes. They can NOT discriminate against you, if you don't wish
to put down your age. The ONLY exceptions are jobs that do have age
limits, such as military and law enforcement.
Here is the Florida Voter Registration application.
http://election.dos.state.fl.us/regtovote/webappform.pdf
Please note line #5 (date of birth).
Please note line #14 (gender)
Damn proving "osprey" wrong is easy. Wish
there was a way to get paid for it......;)
It would be an embarassment of riches, wouldn't it?
---
I contend we are both atheists - I just believe in
one fewer god than you do.
When you understand why you reject all other gods,
you will understand why I reject yours as well.
- Stephen F. Roberts
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter Caught Lying (GOP=Voter Fraud) |
13 Apr 2006 06:23:08 PM |
|
|
Adam H wrote:
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:21:10 -0500, Mitchell Holman
<ta2eeneNoEmail@comcast.com> wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in
news:1144955124.155018.268250@t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Mitchell Holman wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in news:1144950781.021399.112800
@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Mitchell Holman wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in
news:1144873126.704984.224070 @z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
Geoff wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1144854351.542235.249250@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
Slo wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00002682.htm
Brad was just on the Stephanie Miller Show and said that
Coulter refused to fill in a gender box for either male or
female. Things
that
make you go, "hmmmmmm...."
What kind of a mind would go "hmmmm..." to something like that?
What
law says you have to fill in a gender box?
Methinks he was wondering what gender Coulter is. Ever see the
Adam's apple on that *****?
I don't really go around looking for Adam's apple's on people.
Besides, who cares?
Her choosing not to select what sex to put down means nothing.
Coulter said women shouldn't vote.
What does that have to do with her choosing not to select what sex to
put down?
I already know your intollerance towards conservatives, so I am not
interested in your bigoted comments and/or propaganda.
Coulter voted.
Good for her, so should everyone who can. But what does that have to
do with her not chooosing to select what sex she is?
Therefore, Coulter is either a man or a hypocrite.
Because she chose not to put down her sex? You probably actually
believe that, you are dumb enough to.
Which is it?
The fact that she didn't have to and she made a statement. We are
not required to put down what our sex is, our age, our race, and/or
our sexual orientation.
Actually, you ARE reguired to put down your
date of birth, ergo your age.
Actually, you are NOT and I happen to know this because I just got
finished asking a human resource manager this just a week ago in one of
my classes. They can NOT discriminate against you, if you don't wish
to put down your age. The ONLY exceptions are jobs that do have age
limits, such as military and law enforcement.
Here is the Florida Voter Registration application.
http://election.dos.state.fl.us/regtovote/webappform.pdf
Please note line #5 (date of birth).
Please note line #14 (gender)
Damn proving "osprey" wrong is easy. Wish
there was a way to get paid for it......;)
It would be an embarassment of riches, wouldn't it?
Read the application. Box 14 is not REQUIRED to be filled in.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Miriam Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter Caught Lying (GOP=Voter Fraud) |
13 Apr 2006 11:33:19 PM |
|
|
osprey LIED:
I
"One last note: I am very surprised at your reaction especially after
just a few short months ago I provided a copy of my DD214 Right in
box 18...1st line it says... SERVED 2 AUG 90 TO 1 OCT 94 IN SUPPORT
OF OPERATION DESERT SHIELD/STORM and in box 13 NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE
MEDAL Funny how you have selective memory, why? Yes, I served in combat
during Desert Storm."
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.abortion/msg/38f5de5691243868?dmode=source&hl=en
"Fine, if you want to play on words...no I was not in actual "combat" "
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/db12fe6b6ec66a35?dmode=source&hl=en
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Miriam Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter Caught Lying (GOP=Voter Fraud) |
13 Apr 2006 11:31:57 PM |
|
|
osprey LIED:
I thought
"One last note: I am very surprised at your reaction especially after
just a few short months ago I provided a copy of my DD214 Right in
box 18...1st line it says... SERVED 2 AUG 90 TO 1 OCT 94 IN SUPPORT
OF OPERATION DESERT SHIELD/STORM and in box 13 NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE
MEDAL Funny how you have selective memory, why? Yes, I served in combat
during Desert Storm."
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.abortion/msg/38f5de5691243868?dmode=source&hl=en
"Fine, if you want to play on words...no I was not in actual "combat" "
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/db12fe6b6ec66a35?dmode=source&hl=en
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter Caught Lying (GOP=Voter Fraud) |
12 Apr 2006 10:56:12 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:01:26 -0500, Mitchell Holman
<ta2eeneNoEmail@comcast.com> wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in news:1144873126.704984.224070
@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
Geoff wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1144854351.542235.249250@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
Slo wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00002682.htm
Brad was just on the Stephanie Miller Show and said that Coulter
refused to fill in a gender box for either male or female. Things
that
make you go, "hmmmmmm...."
What kind of a mind would go "hmmmm..." to something like that? What
law says you have to fill in a gender box?
Methinks he was wondering what gender Coulter is. Ever see the
Adam's apple on that *****?
I don't really go around looking for Adam's apple's on people.
Besides, who cares?
Her choosing not to select what sex to put down means nothing.
Coulter said women shouldn't vote.
Coulter voted.
Therefore, Coulter is either a man or a hypocrite.
Which is it?
LOL!
Yes.
Mitchell Holman
"It would be a much better country if
women did not vote. That is simply a fact".
Ann Coulter, May 17, 2003.
"I think women should be armed but should not vote"
Ann Coulter, February 26, 2001.
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -2364 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
-----
"Ahhhhhh, yessssssss, ummmmmmm - Alito, Alito, Alito"
-duke (duckgumbo@cox.net), aka PedophilEarl J Weber, 59
year old mateless, heirless biological failure
of Afton Oaks Apartment, Baton Rouge,who pussied
out of the Vietnam draft, showing his gay side
despite his avowed anti-gay bigotry
Contact duke's priest and ask
him why duke is such a racist:
http://www.stpatrickbr.org/
Father Gerard "Jerry" Martin
stpatrickbr<AT>bellsouth<DOT>net
Saint Patrick Catholic Church
12424 Brogdon Lane
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70816
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ben Kaufman" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter Caught Lying (GOP=Voter Fraud) |
13 Apr 2006 08:08:13 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:10:24 -0400, "Geoff" <gebobs@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1144854351.542235.249250@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
Slo wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00002682.htm
Brad was just on the Stephanie Miller Show and said that Coulter
refused to fill in a gender box for either male or female. Things that
make you go, "hmmmmmm...."
What kind of a mind would go "hmmmm..." to something like that? What
law says you have to fill in a gender box?
Methinks he was wondering what gender Coulter is. Ever see the
Adam's apple on that *****?
There is a very interesting syndrome called AIS.
http://www.medhelp.org/www/ais/debates/letters/FATHER.HTM
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter Caught Lying (GOP=Voter Fraud) |
12 Apr 2006 10:23:42 AM |
|
|
Rich white people don't go to jail, you dumshit. Especially in
Florida.
Aaron Hirshberg
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter Caught Lying (GOP=Voter Fraud) |
12 Apr 2006 10:41:46 AM |
|
|
wrote:
Rich white people don't go to jail, you dumshit. Especially in
Florida.
Thomas Capano, rich lawyer..serving life.
I work in corrections you idiot, I see people from all income levels
and all colors go to jail. Lawyers, doctors, police officers,
teachers.
Why don't you learn what you are talking about before you make yourself
look even more stupid.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mitchell Holman" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter Caught Lying (GOP=Voter Fraud) |
12 Apr 2006 04:03:23 PM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in news:1144856506.261342.126900
@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com:
aaronhirshberg@yahoo.com wrote:
Rich white people don't go to jail, you dumshit. Especially in
Florida.
Thomas Capano, rich lawyer..serving life.
Only because he is not related to the governor.
I work in corrections you idiot, I see people from all income levels
and all colors go to jail.
Osprey tries to win an argument by claiming
credentials he has no intention of posting proof
of, film at 11:00
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter Caught Lying (GOP=Voter Fraud) |
12 Apr 2006 09:29:51 PM |
|
|
In article <Xns97A3A35629DF7ta2eene2@216.196.97.131>,
Mitchell Holman <ta2eeneNoEmail@comcast.com> wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in news:1144856506.261342.126900
@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com:
I work in corrections you idiot, I see people from all income levels
and all colors go to jail.
Osprey tries to win an argument by claiming
credentials he has no intention of posting proof
of, film at 11:00
to the best of my recollection, coward bobby has never posted proof
of any claim he made which he was asked to support.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mitchell Holman" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter Caught Lying (GOP=Voter Fraud) |
12 Apr 2006 09:52:47 PM |
|
|
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in news:jgkeegan-
C41398.22295112042006@individual.net:
In article <Xns97A3A35629DF7ta2eene2@216.196.97.131>,
Mitchell Holman <ta2eeneNoEmail@comcast.com> wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in news:1144856506.261342.126900
@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com:
I work in corrections you idiot, I see people from all income levels
and all colors go to jail.
Osprey tries to win an argument by claiming
credentials he has no intention of posting proof
of, film at 11:00
to the best of my recollection, coward bobby has never posted proof
of any claim he made which he was asked to support.
And still he sticks around and posts
more fictions. Amazing.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter Caught Lying (GOP=Voter Fraud) |
13 Apr 2006 10:59:37 AM |
|
|
In article <Xns97A3DE92AF773ta2eene2@216.196.97.131>,
Mitchell Holman <ta2eeneNoEmail@comcast.com> wrote:
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in news:jgkeegan-
C41398.22295112042006@individual.net:
In article <Xns97A3A35629DF7ta2eene2@216.196.97.131>,
Mitchell Holman <ta2eeneNoEmail@comcast.com> wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in news:1144856506.261342.126900
@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com:
I work in corrections you idiot, I see people from all income levels
and all colors go to jail.
Osprey tries to win an argument by claiming
credentials he has no intention of posting proof
of, film at 11:00
to the best of my recollection, coward bobby has never posted proof
of any claim he made which he was asked to support.
And still he sticks around and posts
more fictions. Amazing.
fortunately, no one sane believes anything he posts.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter Caught Lying (GOP=Voter Fraud) |
12 Apr 2006 11:01:41 AM |
|
|
Ann Coulter will not do time. Jeb and his buddies will laugh it off,
and she will not do time.
Capano is doing life for murder. If he had committed a white collar
crime, helped the CIA smuggle drugs, helped Herman Beebe or Neil Bush
loot a financial institution, committed voting fraud, influence
peddling, defrauded the Pentagon, he would not be doing time.
Aaron Hirshberg
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter Caught Lying (GOP=Voter Fraud) |
12 Apr 2006 12:49:23 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Ann Coulter will not do time.
For what? If you have the evidence and can prove it, prosecute!!!
Jeb and his buddies will laugh it off,
and she will not do time.
Prosecute then
Capano is doing life for murder.
You said rich white people don't go to jail, all I did was show how
wrong you are.
If he had committed a white collar
crime,
Like the CEO of Tyco, who is serving time?
helped the CIA smuggle drugs, helped Herman Beebe or Neil Bush
loot a financial institution, committed voting fraud, influence
peddling, defrauded the Pentagon, he would not be doing time.
Excuses..excuses..excuses.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter Caught Lying (GOP=Voter Fraud) |
13 Apr 2006 08:36:56 AM |
|
|
If Dennis Kozlowski had helped the CIA smuggle drugs to pay for the war
in Afghanistan or Nicaragua, or had laundered money for Herman Beebe,
he would not be doing time.
Aaron Hirshberg
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mother Frangelica Live" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter Caught Lying (GOP=Voter Fraud) |
13 Apr 2006 05:12:42 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Ann Coulter will not do time. Jeb and his buddies will laugh it off,
and she will not do time.
Capano is doing life for murder. If he had committed a white collar
crime, helped the CIA smuggle drugs, helped Herman Beebe or Neil Bush
loot a financial institution, committed voting fraud, influence
peddling, defrauded the Pentagon, he would not be doing time.
Aaron Hirshberg
If he committed treason in wartime by exposing a CIA gent he would also
go free, as would he for drunkenly shooting a friend...
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Slo" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter Caught Lying (GOP=Voter Fraud) |
13 Apr 2006 05:04:45 PM |
|
|
osprey wrote:
Slo wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00002682.htm
Brad was just on the Stephanie Miller Show and said that Coulter
refused to fill in a gender box for either male or female. Things that
make you go, "hmmmmmm...."
What kind of a mind would go "hmmmm..." to something like that? What
law says you have to fill in a gender box?
Take a look at this photo of....., it:
http://mediamatters.org/items/200604120004
It's a man baby!
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Ann Coulter Caught Lying (GOP=Voter Fraud) |
13 Apr 2006 06:25:10 PM |
|
|
Slo wrote:
osprey wrote:
Slo wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00002682.htm
Brad was just on the Stephanie Miller Show and said that Coulter
refused to fill in a gender box for either male or female. Things that
make you go, "hmmmmmm...."
What kind of a mind would go "hmmmm..." to something like that? What
law says you have to fill in a gender box?
Take a look at this photo of....., it:
http://mediamatters.org/items/200604120004
It's a man baby!
If this is your fatansy and obsession to go along with this stupidity,
then that says a lot about you.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
