Religions > Atheism > Annihilating Atheists (was: Strategies for Dialoguing with Atheists)
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Nomen Nescio" |
| Date: |
12 Jun 2007 05:50:02 PM |
| Object: |
Annihilating Atheists (was: Strategies for Dialoguing with Atheists) |
Harvest Dancer <harvestdancer@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 8, 8:22 pm, "Carl" <sai...@nettally.com> wrote:
There are plenty of atheists on Usenet ng's and many of them are quite
aggressive and in extreme cases, vitriolic in their responses to Christians.
Of course this occurs when they feel safe at the keyboard and most likely
would never behave that way in person. Regardless, Ron Rhodes offers some
advice and instruction on how to engage in discussion with atheists.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Only after the Atheists officially and unconditionally surrender.
Until then, there is precisely NOTHING to discuss with them. See?
I'm a theist, and I've never had problems getting along with
atheists. They don't care what you believe, until you go into their
groups with the purpose of saving them.
Then they won't care that our sole mission in life is to utterly
force them into unconditional surrender--in much the same way as
we forced the Japanese into unconditional surrender, ending WWII.
As long as Atheists don't care about THAT, we can all be friends. :)
No one is born an atheist. People choose to become atheists as much as they
choose to become Christians. And no matter how strenuously some may try to
deny it, atheism is a belief system. It requires faith that God does not
exist.
Definitely! Atheism most definitely is a *religion*, the darkest,
most draconian, most bigoted, most intolerant religion in history,
but is absolutely definitely a *religion* nonetheless. Atheism is
the official State religion of the U.S.A., which it has been ever
since 1947, when SCOTUS established Atheism as her State religion
(which is why I longer display my American flag, because it is the
symbol of government-controlled, hard-line Anti-Christian Atheism).
That's why the Ten Commandments & Golden Rules, and the theory of
Intelligent Design, are BANNED from every classroom and courtroom
in the U.S.A.! Because hard-line, Anti-Christian *Atheism* is the
official State religion of all government across America, from the
Local and City levels, right on up through State and Federal levels.
Anyone who disagrees with these incontrovertible *facts*, then you
are REQUIRED TO PROVE that the Ten Commandments & Golden Rules, and
the theory of Intelligent Design, are conspicuously present in every
classroom and courtroom in America, bar none. Show me, don't tell me.
Ex-Republican,
Daniel Joseph Min
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBRm8LY5ljD7YrHM/nEQKZ9wCbB4XLp2cuERDUOQAjumAdYi/2ThoAoM1H
srF9xNd7Lfm6zIiLbW2bK2QR
=z1F3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
|
|
| User: "GODEATER" |
|
| Title: Re: Annihilating Atheists (was: Strategies for Dialoguing with Atheists) |
13 Jun 2007 10:25:49 AM |
|
|
"Nomen Nescio" <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:928e841ba2d4fb9eaa7363e80e10c301@dizum.com...
Harvest Dancer <harvestdancer@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 8, 8:22 pm, "Carl" <sai...@nettally.com> wrote:
There are plenty of atheists on Usenet ng's and many of them are quite
aggressive and in extreme cases, vitriolic in their responses to
Christians.
Of course this occurs when they feel safe at the keyboard and most
likely
would never behave that way in person. Regardless, Ron Rhodes offers
some
advice and instruction on how to engage in discussion with atheists.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Only after the Atheists officially and unconditionally surrender.
Until then, there is precisely NOTHING to discuss with them. See?
I'm a theist, and I've never had problems getting along with
atheists. They don't care what you believe, until you go into their
groups with the purpose of saving them.
Then they won't care that our sole mission in life is to utterly
force them into unconditional surrender--in much the same way as
we forced the Japanese into unconditional surrender, ending WWII.
As long as Atheists don't care about THAT, we can all be friends. :)
No one is born an atheist. People choose to become atheists as much as
they
choose to become Christians. And no matter how strenuously some may try
to
deny it, atheism is a belief system. It requires faith that God does not
exist.
Definitely! Atheism most definitely is a *religion*, the darkest,
most draconian, most bigoted, most intolerant religion in history,
but is absolutely definitely a *religion* nonetheless. Atheism is
the official State religion of the U.S.A., which it has been ever
since 1947, when SCOTUS established Atheism as her State religion
(which is why I longer display my American flag, because it is the
symbol of government-controlled, hard-line Anti-Christian Atheism).
That's why the Ten Commandments & Golden Rules, and the theory of
Intelligent Design, are BANNED from every classroom and courtroom
in the U.S.A.! Because hard-line, Anti-Christian *Atheism* is the
official State religion of all government across America, from the
Local and City levels, right on up through State and Federal levels.
Anyone who disagrees with these incontrovertible *facts*, then you
are REQUIRED TO PROVE that the Ten Commandments & Golden Rules, and
the theory of Intelligent Design, are conspicuously present in every
classroom and courtroom in America, bar none. Show me, don't tell me.
Ex-Republican,
Daniel Joseph Min
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
come ***** with me and i'll crush you like the ***** roach that you are.
your kind can never ever defeat us-your too stupid.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Syd M." |
|
| Title: Re: Annihilating Atheists (was: Strategies for Dialoguing with Atheists) |
13 Jun 2007 11:46:55 AM |
|
|
On Jun 13, 11:25 am, "GODEATER" <GODEA...@GODKILLER.ORG> wrote:
"Nomen Nescio" <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:928e841ba2d4fb9eaa7363e80e10c301@dizum.com...
Harvest Dancer <harvestdan...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 8, 8:22 pm, "Carl" <sai...@nettally.com> wrote:
There are plenty of atheists on Usenet ng's and many of them are quite
aggressive and in extreme cases, vitriolic in their responses to
Christians.
Of course this occurs when they feel safe at the keyboard and most
likely
would never behave that way in person. Regardless, Ron Rhodes offers
some
advice and instruction on how to engage in discussion with atheists.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Only after the Atheists officially and unconditionally surrender.
Until then, there is precisely NOTHING to discuss with them. See?
I'm a theist, and I've never had problems getting along with
atheists. They don't care what you believe, until you go into their
groups with the purpose of saving them.
Then they won't care that our sole mission in life is to utterly
force them into unconditional surrender--in much the same way as
we forced the Japanese into unconditional surrender, ending WWII.
As long as Atheists don't care about THAT, we can all be friends. :)
No one is born an atheist. People choose to become atheists as much as
they
choose to become Christians. And no matter how strenuously some may try
to
deny it, atheism is a belief system. It requires faith that God does not
exist.
Definitely! Atheism most definitely is a *religion*, the darkest,
most draconian, most bigoted, most intolerant religion in history,
but is absolutely definitely a *religion* nonetheless. Atheism is
the official State religion of the U.S.A., which it has been ever
since 1947, when SCOTUS established Atheism as her State religion
(which is why I longer display my American flag, because it is the
symbol of government-controlled, hard-line Anti-Christian Atheism).
That's why the Ten Commandments & Golden Rules, and the theory of
Intelligent Design, are BANNED from every classroom and courtroom
in the U.S.A.! Because hard-line, Anti-Christian *Atheism* is the
official State religion of all government across America, from the
Local and City levels, right on up through State and Federal levels.
Anyone who disagrees with these incontrovertible *facts*, then you
are REQUIRED TO PROVE that the Ten Commandments & Golden Rules, and
the theory of Intelligent Design, are conspicuously present in every
classroom and courtroom in America, bar none. Show me, don't tell me.
Ex-Republican,
Daniel Joseph Min
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
come ***** with me and i'll crush you like the ***** roach that you are.
your kind can never ever defeat us-your too stupid.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Don't worry about it.
Min has as much chance of facing you as I have of winning AMERICAN
IDOL..
PDW
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill M" |
|
| Title: Re: Annihilating Atheists (was: Strategies for Dialoguing with Atheists) |
12 Jun 2007 07:00:44 PM |
|
|
"Nomen Nescio" <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:928e841ba2d4fb9eaa7363e80e10c301@dizum.com...
Harvest Dancer <harvestdancer@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 8, 8:22 pm, "Carl" <sai...@nettally.com> wrote:
There are plenty of atheists on Usenet ng's and many of them are quite
aggressive and in extreme cases, vitriolic in their responses to
Christians.
Of course this occurs when they feel safe at the keyboard and most
likely
would never behave that way in person. Regardless, Ron Rhodes offers
some
advice and instruction on how to engage in discussion with atheists.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Only after the Atheists officially and unconditionally surrender.
Until then, there is precisely NOTHING to discuss with them. See?
Surrender??? To what and why??? Atheism is the lack beliveing in any gods.
It is not
trying to force people to believe in myths and fales like religious fanatics
like you.
There is noting to surrender to.
I'm a theist, and I've never had problems getting along with
atheists. They don't care what you believe, until you go into their
groups with the purpose of saving them.
Then they won't care that our sole mission in life is to utterly
force them into unconditional surrender--in much the same way as
we forced the Japanese into unconditional surrender, ending WWII.
As long as Atheists don't care about THAT, we can all be friends. :)
If your religion is so true, why do you need to FORCE others into it???
No one is born an atheist. People choose to become atheists as much as
they
choose to become Christians. And no matter how strenuously some may try
to
deny it, atheism is a belief system. It requires faith that God does not
exist.
Definitely! Atheism most definitely is a *religion*, the darkest,
most draconian, most bigoted, most intolerant religion in history,
but is absolutely definitely a *religion* nonetheless. Atheism is
the official State religion of the U.S.A., which it has been ever
since 1947, when SCOTUS established Atheism as her State religion
(which is why I longer display my American flag, because it is the
symbol of government-controlled, hard-line Anti-Christian Atheism).
Ateism is NOT a religion and it is not the darkest,
most draconian, most bigoted, most intolerant religion in history,
but is absolutely definitely a *religion* nonetheless. It simply declines
to believe in religions because
of the TOTAL LACK of any objective verifiable evidence that ANY gods exist.
That's why the Ten Commandments & Golden Rules, and the theory of
Intelligent Design, are BANNED from every classroom and courtroom
in the U.S.A.!
They are banned because there is NO-NADA objective verifiable evidence they
are correct. They are purely the
opinions of SOME relgions. Schools are also not allowed to teach alchemy and
astrology for the same reasons.
Because hard-line, Anti-Christian *Atheism* is the
official State religion of all government across America, from the
Local and City levels, right on up through State and Federal levels.
Atheism is NOT a religion and all our governement s are NOT run by atheists.
In a Democracy we cannot and
should not try to force religious beleifs on others.
Anyone who disagrees with these incontrovertible *facts*, then you
are REQUIRED TO PROVE that the Ten Commandments & Golden Rules, and
the theory of Intelligent Design, are conspicuously present in every
classroom and courtroom in America, bar none. Show me, don't tell me.
They are NOT PERMITTED in public class rooms because they are NOT ACCEPTED
by a
large part of the citizens as factual or important. Subjects taught should
be based on facts - not religious
opinions like yours.
Ex-Republican,
Daniel Joseph Min
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
GET AN EDUCATION!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "kingdoodlesquat" |
|
| Title: Re: Annihilating Atheists (was: Strategies for Dialoguing with Atheists) |
12 Jun 2007 07:41:37 PM |
|
|
No one is born an atheist. People choose to become atheists as much as
they
choose to become Christians. And no matter how strenuously some may try
to
deny it, atheism is a belief system. It requires faith that God does
not
exist.
Wrong conclusion. For me, it is the absence of belief in any particular
brand of god/s. I do not require your version of faith that your god does
not exist. I do not need your belief or faith crutches. Like most theists,
you are unable to open your minds to any other alternatives other than your
god. Sadly, you are therefore unable to just make a simple & rational
thought without the interference of religion - if you don't believe me, have
a look at one of your most holiest of crusaders that is Chung.
Definitely! Atheism most definitely is a *religion*, the darkest,
most draconian, most bigoted, most intolerant religion in history,
but is absolutely definitely a *religion* nonetheless.
Oh dear, not another "atheism is a religion" argument. - see above - no god,
ergo no religion required.
Atheism is
the official State religion of the U.S.A., which it has been ever
since 1947, when SCOTUS established Atheism as her State religion
(which is why I longer display my American flag, because it is the
symbol of government-controlled, hard-line Anti-Christian Atheism).
I'm not from the US, but doesn't it say "In god we trust" on your currency?
If you believe your official State "religion" is atheism, I could think of a
dozen better phrases than this to put on a dollar bill. However, your
mindless rant suggests that only your religion should be tolerated - that
would appear to be the darkest, most draconian, most bigoted, most
intolerant religion in history (maybe next to islam)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Annihilating Atheists (was: Strategies for Dialoguing with Atheists) |
13 Jun 2007 04:21:22 PM |
|
|
In article <peydna8bQ9DLoPLbnZ2dnUVZ8q6unZ2d@bt.com> "kingdoodlesquat" <neggerscheggers@negatseacatspam.com> writes:
{...}
I'm not from the US, but doesn't it say "In god we trust" on your currency?
If you believe your official State "religion" is atheism, I could think of a
dozen better phrases than this to put on a dollar bill.
But that's the genius of the thing! By putting a God-slogan
on mammon, the Secret Atheist Hegemony is making a mockery
of the teachings of the one who repeatedly condemned wealth
and the wealthy.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Atheist are Stooges" |
|
| Title: Re: Annihilating Atheists (was: Strategies for Dialoguing with Atheists) |
13 Jun 2007 06:18:06 PM |
|
|
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:f4pn4i$6j$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <peydna8bQ9DLoPLbnZ2dnUVZ8q6unZ2d@bt.com> "kingdoodlesquat"
<neggerscheggers@negatseacatspam.com> writes:
{...}
I'm not from the US, but doesn't it say "In god we trust" on your
currency?
If you believe your official State "religion" is atheism, I could think
of a
dozen better phrases than this to put on a dollar bill.
But that's the genius of the thing! By putting a God-slogan
on mammon, the Secret Atheist Hegemony is making a mockery
of the teachings of the one who repeatedly condemned wealth
and the wealthy.
-- cary
Would some scat jpgs brighten up your fetid, poorly thought out widdle
thread?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "t1gercat" |
|
| Title: Re: Annihilating Atheists (was: Strategies for Dialoguing with Atheists) |
13 Jun 2007 03:40:21 PM |
|
|
On Jun 12, 8:41 pm, "kingdoodlesquat"
<neggerschegg...@negatseacatspam.com> wrote:
No one is born an atheist. People choose to become atheists as much as
they
choose to become Christians. And no matter how strenuously some may try
to
deny it, atheism is a belief system. It requires faith that God does
not
exist.
Wrong conclusion. For me, it is the absence of belief in any particular
brand of god/s. I do not require your version of faith that your god does
not exist. I do not need your belief or faith crutches. Like most theists,
you are unable to open your minds to any other alternatives other than your
god. Sadly, you are therefore unable to just make a simple & rational
thought without the interference of religion - if you don't believe me, have
a look at one of your most holiest of crusaders that is Chung.
Definitely! Atheism most definitely is a *religion*, the darkest,
most draconian, most bigoted, most intolerant religion in history,
but is absolutely definitely a *religion* nonetheless.
Oh dear, not another "atheism is a religion" argument. - see above - no god,
ergo no religion required.
Atheism is
the official State religion of the U.S.A., which it has been ever
since 1947, when SCOTUS established Atheism as her State religion
(which is why I longer display my American flag, because it is the
symbol of government-controlled, hard-line Anti-Christian Atheism).
Interesting
I'm not from the US, but doesn't it say "In god we trust" on your currency?
If you believe your official State "religion" is atheism, I could think of a
dozen better phrases than this to put on a dollar bill. However, your
mindless rant suggests that only your religion should be tolerated - that
would appear to be the darkest, most draconian, most bigoted, most
intolerant religion in history (maybe next to islam)
It's only part of the slogan. It was meant to read "In God We Trust.
All Others Pay Cash." Of course, today it's obsolete.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Annihilating Atheists (was: Strategies for Dialoguing with Atheists) |
13 Jun 2007 06:49:44 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:41:37 +0100, kingdoodlesquat wrote:
I'm not from the US, but doesn't it say "In god we trust" on your currency?
Yes. Thus identifying the real "god" of the US.
<G>
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"Behold the foul stench of Skeletor's breakfast burrito!"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Atheist are Stooges" |
|
| Title: Re: Annihilating Atheists (was: Strategies for Dialoguing with Atheists) |
13 Jun 2007 09:37:16 PM |
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote in message
news:pan.2007.06.13.23.49.44.19724@com.mkbilbo...
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:41:37 +0100, kingdoodlesquat wrote:
I'm not from the US, but doesn't it say "In god we trust" on your
currency?
Yes. Thus identifying the real "god" of the US.
<G>
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"Behold the foul stench of Skeletor's breakfast burrito!"
Who gives a damn where you're from or what you believe?
You hate God that much is know :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Annihilating Atheists (was: Strategies for Dialoguing with Atheists) |
14 Jun 2007 10:29:25 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:37:16 -0700, Atheist are Stooges wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote in message
news:pan.2007.06.13.23.49.44.19724@com.mkbilbo...
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 02:41:37 +0100, kingdoodlesquat wrote:
I'm not from the US, but doesn't it say "In god we trust" on your
currency?
Yes. Thus identifying the real "god" of the US.
<G>
Who gives a damn where you're from or what you believe?
You hate God that much is know :-)
God who?
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"Behold the foul stench of Skeletor's breakfast burrito!"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Annihilating Atheists (was: Strategies for Dialoguing with Atheists) |
14 Jun 2007 09:47:46 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:37:16 -0700, Atheist are Stooges wrote:
Who<SMACK>
Bad troll!
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"Behold the foul stench of Skeletor's breakfast burrito!"
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "jl" |
|
| Title: Re: Annihilating Atheists |
13 Jun 2007 11:59:44 AM |
|
|
Best way I know of diminishing atheism is to show the youth of the
world pertinent sections of the Holy Bible.
For instance, take them to chapter 31 of the Book of Numbers and show
them how the godly Israelites murdered over 30,000 little boys and
thousands of innocent Midianite virgins.
The little girls with intact maidenheads who had their private parts
probed by priestly fingers were saved, raped, and kept to gratify
Israelite lust.
This true story among many others of the Christian god should refute
all claims that there is no god.
.
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: Annihilating Atheists |
13 Jun 2007 01:23:27 PM |
|
|
On Jun 13, 9:59 am, jl <jls1...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Best way I know of diminishing atheism is to show the youth of the
world pertinent sections of the Holy Bible.
For instance, take them to chapter 31 of the Book of Numbers and show
them how the godly Israelites murdered over 30,000 little boys and
thousands of innocent Midianite virgins.
The little girls with intact maidenheads who had their private parts
probed by priestly fingers were saved, raped, and kept to gratify
Israelite lust.
This true story among many others of the Christian god should refute
all claims that there is no god.
How about in addition to disclosing "Israelite lust", whereas instead
we just allow the whole truth and nothing but the truth to being
shared, including of whatever else is in evidence about that pesky 6
Day War, and/or as having otherwise been bible or koran scripted.
We should all know about how those Roman Catholics exterminated
Cathars and many others that simply wouldn't pay up, and of how those
smart and powerful Jews polished Hitlers private parts as long as it
looked like they had picked the winning side (similar to their
previous Roman fiasco when they'd put one of their own kind on a
stick).
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
-
Brad Guth
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: Annihilating Atheists (was: Strategies for Dialoguing with Atheists) |
13 Jun 2007 01:10:12 PM |
|
|
In one way or another, there's no such thing as a true Atheist, only
the sorts of fence jumping bigots that'll get their own way no matters
what, and that's as good of as any faith-based form of arrogance,
greed and born-again bigotry as we're ever going to find, and that's
entirely in addition to so many Atheist as spooks, moles and/or
corporate pirates being downright dishonest. It's also what gave the
likes of Hitler and GW Bush the required audience of authority and
power in order to do what they've done, and lo and behold it isn't
over yet until our Atheist fat lady sings.
Atheist are most often the brown-nosed clowns, as the best servitude
minions on behalf of the Zionist cult that's into representing more of
the 'dark side' of whatever faith than not. Hiding behind whatever
hocus-pocus God of Zionism isn't an honest faith, at least it's not
one that's worth its own weight in crapolla.
Not that you folks have ever given an honest tinkers damn, but we're
not even alone within our own solar system, and I've got more than
sufficient proof for backing up that claim.
In addition to whatever Venus has to offer, there's also those nifty
exoplanets of Super-Earths / Gliese 581C and better yet Gliese 581D at
roughly 20 some odd light years away, as for their likely being much
older than Earth, that are each oddly of no topic interest to this
Zion naysay terrestrial realm, of such a typically anti-think-tank
worth of their MI/NSA rusemaster Usenet from hell.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro/browse_frm/thread/921eb2fb12ba4de/b3803c381d34e1a1?lnk=st&q=GLIESE&rnum=4&hl=en#b3803c381d34e1a1
No wonder there's still no light at the end of this Zion tunnel that's
coming from their NASA infomercial Old Testament spewing form of faith-
based hell on Earth, that's clearly opposed to the likes of Muslims,
Cathars or any other group that isn't sufficiently pro-Zion.
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
-
Brad Guth
.
|
|
|
| User: "Neil Kelsey" |
|
| Title: Re: Annihilating Atheists (was: Strategies for Dialoguing with Atheists) |
13 Jun 2007 02:54:09 PM |
|
|
On Jun 13, 11:10 am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
In one way or another, there's no such thing as a true Atheist, only
the sorts of fence jumping bigots that'll get their own way no matters
what, and that's as good of as any faith-based form of arrogance,
greed and born-again bigotry as we're ever going to find, and that's
entirely in addition to so many Atheist as spooks, moles and/or
corporate pirates being downright dishonest.
That is one garbled sentence. I'm guessing you don't like atheists?
It's also what gave the
likes of Hitler and GW Bush the required audience of authority and
power in order to do what they've done, and lo and behold it isn't
over yet until our Atheist fat lady sings.
What is? Atheism? What is an "audience of authority?" And what isn't
over yet? Holy *****, man, you can't even get elected if you admit
you're atheist, why on earth would you think the world government is
an atheist conspiracy (that is, if I am deciphering your paranoid
gibberish correctly)?
Atheist are most often the brown-nosed clowns, as the best servitude
minions on behalf of the Zionist cult that's into representing more of
the 'dark side' of whatever faith than not.
You must have missed the English classes where they discussed syntax.
Or maybe you're just drunk?
Hiding behind whatever
hocus-pocus God of Zionism isn't an honest faith, at least it's not
one that's worth its own weight in crapolla.
Are you single and wondering why?
Not that you folks have ever given an honest tinkers damn, but we're
not even alone within our own solar system, and I've got more than
sufficient proof for backing up that claim.
Oh, here we go. There's not just a conspiracy behind every rock on
earth, there's also a conspiracy throughout the Solar System. I would
LOVE to see your "sufficient proof" for this.
In addition to whatever Venus has to offer, there's also those nifty
exoplanets of Super-Earths / Gliese 581C and better yet Gliese 581D at
roughly 20 some odd light years away,
Those aren't exactly in our Solar System, Carl Sagan.
as for their likely being much
older than Earth, that are each oddly of no topic interest to this
Zion naysay terrestrial realm, of such a typically anti-think-tank
worth of their MI/NSA rusemaster Usenet from hell.http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro/browse_frm/thread/921eb2fb12...
No wonder there's still no light at the end of this Zion tunnel that's
coming from their NASA infomercial Old Testament spewing form of faith-
based hell on Earth, that's clearly opposed to the likes of Muslims,
Cathars or any other group that isn't sufficiently pro-Zion.
I think you'd better shut down your computer, the aliens have a lock
on it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: Annihilating Atheists (was: Strategies for Dialoguing with Atheists) |
15 Jun 2007 01:59:34 PM |
|
|
In a few better words; Why exactly are Atheists so unusually pro
Zion?
How can folks of such supposed science be such devout Atheists
(seemingly 99.9% of Usenet) if you continually side with whatever the
Zion faith-based mindset has to offer?
There's good enough evidence of other nearby intelligent life, as
having been existing/coexisting on Venus, and yet the Atheist mindset
keeps siding with whatever their Zion puppet-masters have to say.
For another good example, our moon's L1 is still taboo/off-limits:
silly old me, I can't but wonder why.
Notice how little is ever getting shared about our moon's L1, whereas
even most anything pertaining to "Clarke Station" becomes taboo/
nondisclosure and/or mainstream banished. Notice how those naysaying
clowns continually taking charge of Usenet either work entirely out of
context by way of excluding critical information, or having taken
aggressive actions as to diverting your request or topic focus as far
away from anything utilizing our moon's L1 as possible. Apparently
there's something of a secret encrypted about our moon's L1 within
their Old Testament.
The Atheists/Zions are pretty much one in the same borg like
collective, in charge of hyping all that's NASA and otherwise covering
thy mutual butts as they ignore the regular laws of physics whenever
possible, plus otherwise having been excluding the best available
science as evidence of ETs is also their status quo norm, of banishing
all that's of any off-world potential on behalf of such ETs or that of
just plain old excluding any other form of life that's capable of
having its own off-world DNA mutations in spite of whatever their Old
Testament has to say.
There is actually damn little if any chance that we've walked upon our
salty old naked moon that's so physically dark, still rather salty and
just terribly reactive, and there's also much less chance of whatever
remaining life existing or coexisting upon Mars, in so much that Mars
becomes their hocus-pocus poster planet of where all of our loot is
going besides into the sorts of weird and spendy missions that are
multi year time consuming and otherwise so far off-world and/or as
further away from Venus as possible.
All of this topic/author stalking as opposition and/or naysayism
certainly isn't Muslim or even Catholic motivated, and otherwise of
the Mormons that are right in there with the weirdness of
Scientologist is why there's no clear path of others having their
honest research and/or worthy conjectures to follow, that isn't taking
on more than our fair share of the mainstream status quo as having
been orchestrated along by the Atheist/Zion infomercial spewing
gauntlet, that would just as soon and without remorse put their own
kind on a stick in order to get their Old Testament way.
The likes of "Lyris ListManager" of 'jewishgen.org' is in charge of
defending their Zion/Jewish group mindset from being exposed to the
truth, and thereby having been excluding others from sharing in the
honest views of those attempting to share and share alike. After all,
this is apparently what a given infomercial spewing cult has to do,
such as our Third Reich cult of Skull and Bones along with their brown-
nosed Atheists minions having their resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) as
their lead puppet, and not that merely a small percentage of such
folks are those out of control and otherwise unpoliced (meaning that
not all Jews are the bad guys)
Earth's moon offers a perfectly nifty nullification or sweet spot of
an efficient station keeping zone, that's nearly ideal for the likes
of accommodating massive Clarke Stations or that of my robust LSE-CM/
ISS as becoming our space depot/gateway (gamma and hard-Xray dosage
moderated by the 256e6 tonnage mass of this CM/ISS habitat). This
nifty though interactive parking zone or gravity-well pocket (some
call it a gravity-hill since it's much like your being interactively
situated upon a hill) is obviously nearby and 97.6% solar illuminated,
plus getting a darn good IR reflected and/or secondary worth of FIR
from the moon at least half of the time, so that PV energy conversion
isn't ever a problem (an artificial solar shade of incorporating a
sufficient number of PV panels takes care of statiion cooling and
providing of surplus energy that could be utilized right here on Earth
or otherwise on the moon for processing whatever).
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
-
Brad Guth
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: Annihilating Atheists (was: Strategies for Dialoguing with Atheists) |
15 Jun 2007 10:00:45 AM |
|
|
On Jun 13, 12:54 pm, Neil Kelsey <neil_kel...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Oh, here we go. There's not just a conspiracy behind every rock on
earth, there's also a conspiracy throughout the Solar System. I would
LOVE to see your "sufficient proof" for this.
If you Atheists keep taking the Zion side, that's all the proof
necessary, and then some. Why otherwise would an Atheist exclude the
regular laws of physics and/or banish the best available scientific
evidence?
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
-
Brad Guth
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: Annihilating Atheists (was: Strategies for Dialoguing with Atheists) |
15 Jun 2007 09:48:13 AM |
|
|
On Jun 13, 12:54 pm, Neil Kelsey <neil_kel...@hotmail.com> wrote:
That is one garbled sentence. I'm guessing you don't like atheists?
I don't like fence jumping Atheists.
Why are Atheists so unusually pro Zion?
How can you be a devout Atheist if you continually side with whatever
the Zion mindset has to offer?
For example, our moon's L1 is still taboo/off-limits: silly old me, I
can't but wonder why.
Notice how little is ever shared about our moon's L1, whereas even
anything pertaining to "Clarke Station" becomes taboo/nondisclosure.
Notice how those taking charge of Usenet either exclude critical
information or take aggressive actions as to diverting your request or
topic focus as far away from anything utilizing our moon's L1 as
possible.
The Atheists/Zions are pretty much one in the same, in charge of
hyping all that's NASA and otherwise covering thy mutual butts as they
ignore the regular laws of physics whenever possible, plus otherwise
having been excluding the best available science as evidence of ETs is
also their status quo norm, of banishing all that's of any off-world
potential on behalf of ETs or of just plain old excluding any other
life that's capable of having its own off-world DNA mutations in spite
of whatever their Old Testament has to say.
There is actually damn little if any chance that we've walked upon our
salty old moon that's so physically dark, salty and terribly reactive,
and there's much less chance of whatever remaining life existing or
coexisting upon Mars, in that Mars becomes their poster planet of
where all of our loot is going besides into the sorts of weird and
spendy missions that are multy year time consuming and otherwise so
far off-world and/or as further away from Venus as possible.
All of this topic/author stalking and opposition and/or naysayism
certainly isn't Muslim or even Catholic, and otherwise of the Mormons
that are right in there with the weirdness of Scientologist is why
there's no clear path of others with their honest research and/or
worthy conjectures to follow, that isn't taking on more than our fair
share of the mainstream status quo as having been orchestrated along
by the Atheist/Zion infomercial spewing gauntlet, that would just as
soon put their own kind on a stick in order to get their Old Testament
way.
The likes of "Lyris ListManager" of 'jewishgen.org' is in charge of
defending their Zion/Jewish group mindset from being exposed to the
truth, and thereby excluding others from sharing in the honest views
of those attempting to share and share alike. This is apparently what
a given infomercial spewing cult has to do, such as our Third Reich
cult of Skull and Bones along with their brown-nosed Atheists minions
having their resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) as their lead puppet, and
not that a small percentage of such folks are those out of control and
otherwise unpoliced.
Earth's moon offers a nifty nullification or sweet spot of an efficien
station keeping zone, that's ideal for the likes of Clarke Stations or
that of my LSE-CM/ISS as becoming our space depot/gateway (gamma and
hard-Xray dosage moderated by the 256e6 tonne mass of the CM/ISS
habitat). This nifty though interactive parking zone or gravity-well
pocket (some call it a gravity-hill since it's much like your being
interactively situated upon a hill) is obviously nearby and 97.6%
solar illuminated, plus getting a darn good IR reflected and/or
secondary worth of FIR from the moon at least half of the time, so
that PV energy conversion isn't ever a problem (an artificial solar
shade of a sufficient number of PV panels takes care of cooling and
providing of surplus energy).
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
-
Brad Guth
.
|
|
|
| User: "Neil Kelsey" |
|
| Title: Re: Annihilating Atheists (was: Strategies for Dialoguing with Atheists) |
15 Jun 2007 08:25:28 PM |
|
|
On Jun 15, 7:48 am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 13, 12:54 pm, Neil Kelsey <neil_kel...@hotmail.com> wrote:
That is one garbled sentence. I'm guessing you don't like atheists?
I don't like fence jumping Atheists.
Why are Atheists so unusually pro Zion?
How can you be a devout Atheist if you continually side with whatever
the Zion mindset has to offer?
For example, our moon's L1 is still taboo/off-limits: silly old me, I
can't but wonder why.
Notice how little is ever shared about our moon's L1, whereas even
anything pertaining to "Clarke Station" becomes taboo/nondisclosure.
Notice how those taking charge of Usenet either exclude critical
information or take aggressive actions as to diverting your request or
topic focus as far away from anything utilizing our moon's L1 as
possible.
The Atheists/Zions are pretty much one in the same, in charge of
hyping all that's NASA and otherwise covering thy mutual butts as they
ignore the regular laws of physics whenever possible, plus otherwise
having been excluding the best available science as evidence of ETs is
also their status quo norm, of banishing all that's of any off-world
potential on behalf of ETs or of just plain old excluding any other
life that's capable of having its own off-world DNA mutations in spite
of whatever their Old Testament has to say.
There is actually damn little if any chance that we've walked upon our
salty old moon that's so physically dark, salty and terribly reactive,
and there's much less chance of whatever remaining life existing or
coexisting upon Mars, in that Mars becomes their poster planet of
where all of our loot is going besides into the sorts of weird and
spendy missions that are multy year time consuming and otherwise so
far off-world and/or as further away from Venus as possible.
All of this topic/author stalking and opposition and/or naysayism
certainly isn't Muslim or even Catholic, and otherwise of the Mormons
that are right in there with the weirdness of Scientologist is why
there's no clear path of others with their honest research and/or
worthy conjectures to follow, that isn't taking on more than our fair
share of the mainstream status quo as having been orchestrated along
by the Atheist/Zion infomercial spewing gauntlet, that would just as
soon put their own kind on a stick in order to get their Old Testament
way.
The likes of "Lyris ListManager" of 'jewishgen.org' is in charge of
defending their Zion/Jewish group mindset from being exposed to the
truth, and thereby excluding others from sharing in the honest views
of those attempting to share and share alike. This is apparently what
a given infomercial spewing cult has to do, such as our Third Reich
cult of Skull and Bones along with their brown-nosed Atheists minions
having their resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) as their lead puppet, and
not that a small percentage of such folks are those out of control and
otherwise unpoliced.
Earth's moon offers a nifty nullification or sweet spot of an efficien
station keeping zone, that's ideal for the likes of Clarke Stations or
that of my LSE-CM/ISS as becoming our space depot/gateway (gamma and
hard-Xray dosage moderated by the 256e6 tonne mass of the CM/ISS
habitat). This nifty though interactive parking zone or gravity-well
pocket (some call it a gravity-hill since it's much like your being
interactively situated upon a hill) is obviously nearby and 97.6%
solar illuminated, plus getting a darn good IR reflected and/or
secondary worth of FIR from the moon at least half of the time, so
that PV energy conversion isn't ever a problem (an artificial solar
shade of a sufficient number of PV panels takes care of cooling and
providing of surplus energy).
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
-
Brad Guth
I'm sorry, you're insane and you're religious. Nevermind, I won't
expect a coherent answer then.
Anyone else noticing a theme here? I know there are sane theists, but
I'd pause for thought if I were them since almost all deranged people
are religious, and it's often the most deranged of all who become
icons within their religion (I don't want to name names, but one
example rhymes with Esus Rist).
.
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: Annihilating Atheists (was: Strategies for Dialoguing with Atheists) |
17 Jun 2007 05:19:32 PM |
|
|
On Jun 15, 6:25 pm, Neil Kelsey <neil_kel...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 15, 7:48 am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 13, 12:54 pm, Neil Kelsey <neil_kel...@hotmail.com> wrote:
That is one garbled sentence. I'm guessing you don't like atheists?
I don't like fence jumping Atheists.
Why are Atheists so unusually pro Zion?
How can you be a devout Atheist if you continually side with whatever
the Zion mindset has to offer?
For example, ourmoon'sL1 is still taboo/off-limits: silly old me, I
can't but wonder why.
Notice how little is ever shared about ourmoon'sL1, whereas even
anything pertaining to "Clarke Station" becomes taboo/nondisclosure.
Notice how those taking charge of Usenet either exclude critical
information or take aggressive actions as to diverting your request or
topic focus as far away from anything utilizing ourmoon'sL1 as
possible.
The Atheists/Zions are pretty much one in the same, in charge of
hyping all that'sNASAand otherwise covering thy mutual butts as they
ignore the regular laws of physics whenever possible, plus otherwise
having been excluding the best available science as evidence of ETs is
also their status quo norm, of banishing all that's of any off-world
potential on behalf of ETs or of just plain old excluding any other
life that's capable of having its own off-world DNA mutations in spite
of whatever their Old Testament has to say.
There is actually damn little if any chance that we've walked upon our
salty oldmoonthat's so physically dark, salty and terribly reactive,
and there's much less chance of whatever remaining life existing or
coexisting upon Mars, in that Mars becomes their poster planet of
where all of our loot is going besides into the sorts of weird and
spendy missions that are multy year time consuming and otherwise so
far off-world and/or as further away from Venus as possible.
All of this topic/author stalking and opposition and/or naysayism
certainly isn't Muslim or even Catholic, and otherwise of the Mormons
that are right in there with the weirdness of Scientologist is why
there's no clear path of others with their honest research and/or
worthy conjectures to follow, that isn't taking on more than our fair
share of the mainstream status quo as having been orchestrated along
by the Atheist/Zion infomercial spewing gauntlet, that would just as
soon put their own kind on a stick in order to get their Old Testament
way.
The likes of "Lyris ListManager" of 'jewishgen.org' is in charge of
defending their Zion/Jewish group mindset from being exposed to the
truth, and thereby excluding others from sharing in the honest views
of those attempting to share and share alike. This is apparently what
a given infomercial spewing cult has to do, such as our Third Reich
cult of Skull and Bones along with their brown-nosed Atheists minions
having their resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) as their lead puppet, and
not that a small percentage of such folks are those out of control and
otherwise unpoliced.
Earth'smoonoffers a nifty nullification or sweet spot of an efficien
station keeping zone, that's ideal for the likes of Clarke Stations or
that of my LSE-CM/ISS as becoming our space depot/gateway (gamma and
hard-Xray dosage moderated by the 256e6 tonne mass of the CM/ISS
habitat). This nifty though interactive parking zone or gravity-well
pocket (some call it a gravity-hill since it's much like your being
interactively situated upon a hill) is obviously nearby and 97.6%
solar illuminated, plus getting a darn good IR reflected and/or
secondary worth of FIR from themoonat least half of the time, so
that PV energy conversion isn't ever a problem (an artificial solar
shade of a sufficient number of PV panels takes care of cooling and
providing of surplus energy).
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
-
Brad Guth
I'm sorry, you're insane and you're religious. Nevermind, I won't
expect a coherent answer then.
Anyone else noticing a theme here? I know there are sane theists, but
I'd pause for thought if I were them since almost all deranged people
are religious, and it's often the most deranged of all who become
icons within their religion (I don't want to name names, but one
example rhymes with Esus Rist).- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Are you silly Atheist Zions having yet another bad Usenet day?
Is your LLPOF puppet warlord not performing according to plan?
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
-
Brad Guth
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Annihilating Atheists (was: Strategies for Dialoguing with Atheists) |
13 Jun 2007 06:47:12 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:10:12 +0000, BradGuth wrote:
In one way or another, there's no such thing as a true Atheist
And yet you're posting to a ng full of actual, bona fide atheists.
Funny that...
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"Behold the foul stench of Skeletor's breakfast burrito!"
.
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: Annihilating Atheists (was: Strategies for Dialoguing with Atheists) |
15 Jun 2007 09:50:39 AM |
|
|
On Jun 13, 4:47 pm, "Mark K. Bilbo" <g...@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:10:12 +0000, BradGuth wrote:
In one way or another, there's no such thing as a true Atheist
And yet you're posting to a ng full of actual, bona fide atheists.
Why are Atheists so unusually pro Zion?
How can you folks be a devout Atheist if you continually side with
whatever the Zion mindset has to offer?
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
-
Brad Guth
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Annihilating Atheists (was: Strategies for Dialoguing with Atheists) |
15 Jun 2007 10:25:04 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:50:39 +0000, BradGuth wrote:
On Jun 13, 4:47 pm, "Mark K. Bilbo" <g...@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:10:12 +0000, BradGuth wrote:
In one way or another, there's no such thing as a true Atheist
And yet you're posting to a ng full of actual, bona fide atheists.
Why are Atheists so unusually pro Zion?
How can you folks be a devout Atheist if you continually side with
whatever the Zion mindset has to offer?
Um... what?
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"Behold the foul stench of Skeletor's breakfast burrito!"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Annihilating Atheists (was: Strategies for Dialoguing with Atheists) |
15 Jun 2007 11:50:59 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:25:04 -0500 there was an Ancient "Mark K.
Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> who stoppeth one in alt.atheism
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:50:39 +0000, BradGuth wrote:
On Jun 13, 4:47 pm, "Mark K. Bilbo" <g...@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:10:12 +0000, BradGuth wrote:
In one way or another, there's no such thing as a true Atheist
And yet you're posting to a ng full of actual, bona fide atheists.
Why are Atheists so unusually pro Zion?
How can you folks be a devout Atheist if you continually side with
whatever the Zion mindset has to offer?
Um... what?
Brad is a loon. He shows up in alt.conspiracy as a Moon Hoaxer of the
highest waters. He's convinced the Moon is a source of gamma rays.
Seriously.
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Jason Gastrich is praying for me on 8 January 2011
"The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the
source of all true art and all science. He to whom this emotion is a
stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as
good as dead: his eyes are closed." - Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doc Smartass" |
|
| Title: Re: Annihilating Atheists (was: Strategies for Dialoguing with Atheists) |
16 Jun 2007 06:36:51 PM |
|
|
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
news:0sq6735be4vs4r1rdsn0lfg7fs140s8lkr@4ax.com:
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:25:04 -0500 there was an Ancient "Mark K.
Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> who stoppeth one in alt.atheism
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:50:39 +0000, BradGuth wrote:
On Jun 13, 4:47 pm, "Mark K. Bilbo" <g...@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:10:12 +0000, BradGuth wrote:
In one way or another, there's no such thing as a true Atheist
And yet you're posting to a ng full of actual, bona fide atheists.
Why are Atheists so unusually pro Zion?
How can you folks be a devout Atheist if you continually side with
whatever the Zion mindset has to offer?
Um... what?
Brad is a loon. He shows up in alt.conspiracy as a Moon Hoaxer of the
highest waters. He's convinced the Moon is a source of gamma rays.
Seriously.
Gamma rays. Hah!
Maybe that's why...why it GLOWS at night! =0
--
Doc Smartass, BAAWA Knight of Heckling
aa # 1939
Help Prevent Projectile Stupidity
Duct-Tape a Fundie's Mouth Shut Today!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Annihilating Atheists (was: Strategies for Dialoguing with Atheists) |
16 Jun 2007 08:00:31 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 00:36:51 +0000, Doc Smartass wrote:
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
news:0sq6735be4vs4r1rdsn0lfg7fs140s8lkr@4ax.com:
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:25:04 -0500 there was an Ancient "Mark K.
Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> who stoppeth one in alt.atheism
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:50:39 +0000, BradGuth wrote:
On Jun 13, 4:47 pm, "Mark K. Bilbo" <g...@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:10:12 +0000, BradGuth wrote:
In one way or another, there's no such thing as a true Atheist
And yet you're posting to a ng full of actual, bona fide atheists.
Why are Atheists so unusually pro Zion?
How can you folks be a devout Atheist if you continually side with
whatever the Zion mindset has to offer?
Um... what?
Brad is a loon. He shows up in alt.conspiracy as a Moon Hoaxer of the
highest waters. He's convinced the Moon is a source of gamma rays.
Seriously.
Gamma rays. Hah!
Maybe that's why...why it GLOWS at night! =0
Maybe that's why *I glow at night!
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"Behold the foul stench of Skeletor's breakfast burrito!"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doc Smartass" |
|
| Title: Re: Annihilating Atheists (was: Strategies for Dialoguing with Atheists) |
19 Jun 2007 09:32:58 PM |
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote in
news:pan.2007.06.17.01.00.30.456879@com.mkbilbo:
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 00:36:51 +0000, Doc Smartass wrote:
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
news:0sq6735be4vs4r1rdsn0lfg7fs140s8lkr@4ax.com:
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:25:04 -0500 there was an Ancient "Mark K.
Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> who stoppeth one in alt.atheism
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:50:39 +0000, BradGuth wrote:
On Jun 13, 4:47 pm, "Mark K. Bilbo" <g...@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:10:12 +0000, BradGuth wrote:
In one way or another, there's no such thing as a true Atheist
And yet you're posting to a ng full of actual, bona fide atheists.
Why are Atheists so unusually pro Zion?
How can you folks be a devout Atheist if you continually side with
whatever the Zion mindset has to offer?
Um... what?
Brad is a loon. He shows up in alt.conspiracy as a Moon Hoaxer of
the
highest waters. He's convinced the Moon is a source of gamma rays.
Seriously.
Gamma rays. Hah!
Maybe that's why...why it GLOWS at night! =0
Maybe that's why *I glow at night!
Cherenkov radiation?
--
Doc Smartass, BAAWA Knight of Heckling
aa # 1939
Help Prevent Projectile Stupidity
Duct-Tape a Fundie's Mouth Shut Today!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: Annihilating Atheists (was: Strategies for Dialoguing with Atheists) |
17 Jun 2007 05:15:13 PM |
|
|
On Jun 15, 9:50 pm, Douglas Berry <penguin_...@mindOBVIOUSspring.com>
wrote:
Brad is a loon. He shows up in alt.conspiracy as aMoonHoaxer of the
highest waters. He's convinced theMoonis a source of gamma rays.
So, the regular laws of physics and the best available science are
each loon worthy to a Zionist rusemaster like yourself.
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
-
Brad Guth
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Annihilating Atheists (was: Strategies for Dialoguing with Atheists) |
16 Jun 2007 01:20:46 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 16 Jun 2007 05:50:59 +0000, Douglas Berry wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:25:04 -0500 there was an Ancient "Mark K.
Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> who stoppeth one in alt.atheism
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:50:39 +0000, BradGuth wrote:
On Jun 13, 4:47 pm, "Mark K. Bilbo" <g...@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:10:12 +0000, BradGuth wrote:
In one way or another, there's no such thing as a true Atheist
And yet you're posting to a ng full of actual, bona fide atheists.
Why are Atheists so unusually pro Zion?
How can you folks be a devout Atheist if you continually side with
whatever the Zion mindset has to offer?
Um... what?
Brad is a loon. He shows up in alt.conspiracy as a Moon Hoaxer of the
highest waters. He's convinced the Moon is a source of gamma rays.
Seriously.
Get my tin foil hat!
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"Behold the foul stench of Skeletor's breakfast burrito!"
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Annihilating Atheists (was: Strategies for Dialoguing with Atheists) |
15 Jun 2007 01:26:02 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:25:04 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:50:39 +0000, BradGuth wrote:
On Jun 13, 4:47 pm, "Mark K. Bilbo" <g...@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:10:12 +0000, BradGuth wrote:
In one way or another, there's no such thing as a true Atheist
And yet you're posting to a ng full of actual, bona fide atheists.
Why are Atheists so unusually pro Zion?
How can you folks be a devout Atheist if you continually side with
whatever the Zion mindset has to offer?
Um... what?
It's really best that you don't try to make sense of Brad's posts. <G>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
