Religions > Atheism > Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote.
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Randy Jabsco" |
| Date: |
12 Dec 2003 03:02:24 PM |
| Object: |
Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
Hey, I thought you faggots said that people were "accepting" you now.
What's this all about? I thought you faggots said that "ignorance to old
beliefs are making way". Come on faggots, explain this... I don't
understand. If people love faggots so much, why would over two-thirds vote
otherwise? Why is there currently 38 states with anti-gay marriage laws,
all properly voted for by the public? I am having troubles understanding
why the only way faggots can appear to be accepted is by finding a
sympathetic judge to scratch out laws for them. Can't you get the
"accepting" public to vote for them for you? Why isn't it that the faggots
aren't putting these issues on the ballets rather than taking it to
sympathetic judges and congress men?
===
Ohio House passes anti-gay marriage bill
COLUMBUS -- Gay marriage would be banned and state employees could not
obtain health insurance and other benefits for unmarried partners under a
bill passed by the Ohio House on Wednesday.
The measure, approved by a 73-23 vote, would recognize marriage as a union
"between one man and one woman" and declare that extending benefits for
unmarried partners to state employees, whether of the same or opposite sex,
is against state policy.
Supporters of the measure point toward the possibility of other states
approving homosexual unions as the impetus for Ohio to set its own standards
for marriage.
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court last month declared that state's
gay marriage ban unconstitutional and ordered lawmakers to extend the legal
benefits of marriage to domestic partners.
But opponents called the bill discrimination.
House minority leader Rep. Chris Redfern, D-Catawba Island, said committee
hearings on the bill were filled with "hate filled language and bigoted
comments" about homosexuals.
"I cannot allow myself to be aligned with that," he said. "I have respect
for my fellow members ... but I don't want them to be the morality police."
Redfern added that considering society's 50-percent divorce rate, it's hard
to argue that the issue is about upholding the sanctity of marriage.
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Gays get anoth -Bob gets a "***** SLAP" with his own stupidity |
19 Dec 2003 06:07:52 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 22:01:32 GMT, Al Ongapo wrote:
snip
You post an opinion, I counter with a more broadly accepted opinion.
That's the way it going. That you can't live with that is not a
problem for me. Throw that mirror away, boy.
Wrong again. You make a claim. I and others ask for data to support
the claim. You respond with personal insults but never provide any
data. You have no argument. I don't think you particularly care if
anything you say has any objective connection to reality. As you
said:
I can advance any reason I
wish to support traditional marriage
When asked if you had any support for your claims.
Thomas P.
None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
"But he has got nothing on," said a little child.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Ongapo" |
|
| Title: Re: Gays get anoth -Bob gets a "***** SLAP" with his own stupidity |
19 Dec 2003 08:48:50 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 01:07:52 +0100,
wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 22:01:32 GMT, Al Ongapo wrote:
snip
You post an opinion, I counter with a more broadly accepted opinion.
That's the way it going. That you can't live with that is not a
problem for me. Throw that mirror away, boy.
Wrong again. You make a claim. I and others ask for data to support
the claim. You respond with personal insults but never provide any
data. You have no argument. I don't think you particularly care if
anything you say has any objective connection to reality. As you
said:
I can advance any reason I
wish to support traditional marriage
When asked if you had any support for your claims.
May I suggest this. If you don't like my response, *****!. That
should clear up your acne too, boy.
Thomas P.
None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
"But he has got nothing on," said a little child.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Ongapo" |
|
| Title: Re: Gays get anoth -Bob gets a "***** SLAP" with his own stupidity |
16 Dec 2003 04:17:22 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 21:49:10 +0100,
wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:19:28 GMT, Al Ongapo wrote:
Work it out for yourself. The VAST MAJORITY of societies (world wide)
clearly understand it and for that reason oppose SSM.
They are your assertions. Do you or do you not have any objective
data to offer in support of your assertions? If it is so obvious, you
should have no problem supporting them.
Try this on for size: "Less than 1/10,000 of the worlds population
lives in societies that support same sex marriage." Does that give you
a clue as to what the vast majority of people think about SSM?
Thomas P.
None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
"But he has got nothing on," said a little child.
Typical of homosexuals around young boys, huh?
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Gays get anoth -Bob gets a "***** SLAP" with his own stupidity |
17 Dec 2003 12:39:35 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:17:22 GMT, Al Ongapo wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 21:49:10 +0100,
wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:19:28 GMT, Al Ongapo wrote:
Work it out for yourself. The VAST MAJORITY of societies (world wide)
clearly understand it and for that reason oppose SSM.
They are your assertions. Do you or do you not have any objective
data to offer in support of your assertions? If it is so obvious, you
should have no problem supporting them.
Try this on for size: "Less than 1/10,000 of the worlds population
lives in societies that support same sex marriage." Does that give you
a clue as to what the vast majority of people think about SSM?
What I asked for was objective data to back up your assertion. In
your words:
It would force the rest of us to accept a public
judgment that "personal desire outweighs the value of traditional
marriage and outweighs the need of children for mothers and fathers."
I am not asking what people think. Do you have any objective data to
back up the above assertion?
Thomas P.
None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
"But he has got nothing on," said a little child.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Ongapo" |
|
| Title: Re: Gays get anoth -Bob gets a "***** SLAP" with his own stupidity |
17 Dec 2003 01:15:23 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 07:39:35 +0100,
wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:17:22 GMT, Al Ongapo wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 21:49:10 +0100,
wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:19:28 GMT, Al Ongapo wrote:
Work it out for yourself. The VAST MAJORITY of societies (world wide)
clearly understand it and for that reason oppose SSM.
They are your assertions. Do you or do you not have any objective
data to offer in support of your assertions? If it is so obvious, you
should have no problem supporting them.
Try this on for size: "Less than 1/10,000 of the worlds population
lives in societies that support same sex marriage." Does that give you
a clue as to what the vast majority of people think about SSM?
What I asked for was objective data to back up your assertion. In
your words:
It would force the rest of us to accept a public
judgment that "personal desire outweighs the value of traditional
marriage and outweighs the need of children for mothers and fathers."
I am not asking what people think. Do you have any objective data to
back up the above assertion?
Try confining your responses to the single appropriate poster in the
future. I know it's all very confusing for you but do try, boy.
Thomas P.
None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
"But he has got nothing on," said a little child.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "L D Blake" |
|
| Title: Re: Gays get anoth -Bob gets a "***** SLAP" with his own stupidity |
16 Dec 2003 10:28:08 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:03:22 +0100, wrote:
What they are now demanding is the very same right everybody else has.
It is a legal, secular right that is being discussed nothing more than
that.
It's a lot more than just permission to hit the sack... and in all truth it
has very little to do with having sex.
Key issues:
Inheritance rights
Pension rights
Communal property rights
Divorce rights
Child Custody and visitation
Medical benefits
Joint tax returns
Hospital Visitation
You know... all the stuff het-weds take for granted.
-----
Laura
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Gays get anoth -Bob gets a "***** SLAP" with his own stupidity |
16 Dec 2003 11:09:11 AM |
|
|
L D Blake wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:03:22 +0100, wrote:
What they are now demanding is the very same right everybody else has.
It is a legal, secular right that is being discussed nothing more than
that.
It's a lot more than just permission to hit the sack... and in all truth it
has very little to do with having sex.
Key issues:
Inheritance rights
Pension rights
Communal property rights
Divorce rights
Child Custody and visitation
Medical benefits
Joint tax returns
Hospital Visitation
You know... all the stuff het-weds take for granted.
Laura
You left out the only one that really matters, the one that is the basis
and reason for marriage.
Creating and raising children and forming a family from the union of
a man and woman. Thereby providing the society with its future.
Your greed focuses only on receiving unearned societal benefits at
taxpayer or corporate expense. Go pound sand.
Bob
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Gays get anoth -Bob gets a "***** SLAP" with his own stupidity |
16 Dec 2003 09:00:24 PM |
|
|
Lo, many moons past, on Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:09:11 -0700, a stranger
called by some Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> came forth and told this
tale in alt.atheism
You left out the only one that really matters, the one that is the basis
and reason for marriage.
Creating and raising children and forming a family from the union of
a man and woman. Thereby providing the society with its future.
Kids are born all the time to committed couples who aren't married.
So much for that idea.
Your greed focuses only on receiving unearned societal benefits at
taxpayer or corporate expense. Go pound sand.
Actually, the historical reason for marriage was property and sealing
alliances.
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the
Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Gays get anoth -Bob gets a "***** SLAP" with his own stupidity |
16 Dec 2003 09:18:40 PM |
|
|
Douglas Berry wrote:
Lo, many moons past, on Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:09:11 -0700, a stranger
called by some Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> came forth and told this
tale in alt.atheism
You left out the only one that really matters, the one that is the basis
and reason for marriage.
Creating and raising children and forming a family from the union of
a man and woman. Thereby providing the society with its future.
Kids are born all the time to committed couples who aren't married.
So much for that idea.
A classic rump rider argument intended to destroy the meaning of marriage.
[Hint: Repeating it over and over and over won't make it true.]
Your greed focuses only on receiving unearned societal benefits at
taxpayer or corporate expense. Go pound sand.
Actually, the historical reason for marriage was property and sealing
alliances.
LOL. Alliances once were created by creating common children. You
prove the fact that marriage was and is about families and children.
Bob
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the
Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows"
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "L D Blake" |
|
| Title: Re: Gays get anoth -Bob gets a "***** SLAP" with his own stupidity |
16 Dec 2003 11:59:36 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:09:11 -0700, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
You left out the only one that really matters, the one that is the basis
and reason for marriage.
Creating and raising children and forming a family from the union of
a man and woman. Thereby providing the society with its future.
Your greed focuses only on receiving unearned societal benefits at
taxpayer or corporate expense. Go pound sand.
Ok... so lets play fair... lets dissolve all those het marriages that don't
or can't produce children. Lets cut them off all spousal benefits, dump their
communal property rights and ditch their divorce rights, prohibit them from
filing joint tax returns, cut off their joint health plans and deny them
access to pensions and income protections...
Fair is fair.
But, you'd never sit still for that... would you.
Fact is, it's heterosexuals who have special rights in this society.
-----
Laura
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dennis Kemmerer" |
|
| Title: Re: Gays get anoth -Bob gets a "***** SLAP" with his own stupidity |
16 Dec 2003 01:19:21 PM |
|
|
"L D Blake" <ldblake@JUNKBLOCK.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:7uhutvs52rokkn359ssfb5gq2skp5bonha@news1.on.sympatico.ca...
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:09:11 -0700, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
You left out the only one that really matters, the one that is the basis
and reason for marriage.
Creating and raising children and forming a family from the union of
a man and woman. Thereby providing the society with its future.
Your greed focuses only on receiving unearned societal benefits at
taxpayer or corporate expense. Go pound sand.
Ok... so lets play fair... lets dissolve all those het marriages that
don't
or can't produce children.
We've been through this line of reasoning with Boob. He's dumber than a sack
of rocks.
Lets cut them off all spousal benefits, dump their
communal property rights and ditch their divorce rights, prohibit them
from
filing joint tax returns, cut off their joint health plans and deny them
access to pensions and income protections...
Fair is fair.
But, you'd never sit still for that... would you.
Fact is, it's heterosexuals who have special rights in this society.
Careful, Laura, Boob's going to call you a 'rump rider with a gay agenda!'
.
|
|
|
| User: "L D Blake" |
|
| Title: Re: Gays get anoth -Bob gets a "***** SLAP" with his own stupidity |
16 Dec 2003 03:03:39 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:19:21 -0800, "Dennis Kemmerer" <dk@suespammers.org>
wrote:
We've been through this line of reasoning with Boob. He's dumber than a sack
of rocks.
More trouble than a barrel of pregnant skunks?
Careful, Laura, Boob's going to call you a 'rump rider with a gay agenda!'
Believe me hon, I've been called worse...
It never ceases to amaze me how some people can be on this planet for half a
century and never learn a damned thing.
-----
Laura
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dennis Kemmerer" |
|
| Title: Re: Gays get anoth -Bob gets a "***** SLAP" with his own stupidity |
16 Dec 2003 03:50:08 PM |
|
|
"L D Blake" <ldblake@JUNKBLOCK.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:pmsutv8i7rj8nmb9hdaf4jiigdlipub1d6@news1.on.sympatico.ca...
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:19:21 -0800, "Dennis Kemmerer" <dk@suespammers.org>
wrote:
We've been through this line of reasoning with Boob. He's dumber than a
sack
of rocks.
More trouble than a barrel of pregnant skunks?
Thanks, can I file that one away for later use?
Boob's too stupid to be trouble.
Careful, Laura, Boob's going to call you a 'rump rider with a gay
agenda!'
Believe me hon, I've been called worse...
It never ceases to amaze me how some people can be on this planet for half
a
century and never learn a damned thing.
As I've said before, intelligent people gain wisdom. Stupid people just get
old.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Laura tries a "***** SLAP" and finds only her own stupidity |
16 Dec 2003 03:25:39 PM |
|
|
L D Blake wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:19:21 -0800, "Dennis Kemmerer" <dk@suespammers.org>
wrote:
We've been through this line of reasoning with Boob. He's dumber than a sack
of rocks.
More trouble than a barrel of pregnant skunks?
Careful, Laura, Boob's going to call you a 'rump rider with a gay agenda!'
Believe me hon, I've been called worse...
It never ceases to amaze me how some people can be on this planet for half a
century and never learn a damned thing.
Laura
Boo Hoo. We're crying in our pretzels.
Bob
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vic Sagerquist" |
|
| Title: Re: Laura tries a "***** SLAP" and finds only her own stupidity |
16 Dec 2003 04:34:23 PM |
|
|
One day in alt.atheism, Also Sprach Bob:
Boo Hoo. We're crying in our pretzels.
Normal people prefer mustard.
--
Vic Sagerquist
aa#2011
______________
The fool says in his heart "there is no God".
The wise man says it to the world.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Wild Bill Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: Gays get anoth -Bob gets a "***** SLAP" with his own stupidity |
16 Dec 2003 04:20:33 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:03:39 -0500,
L D Blake <ldblake@JUNKBLOCK.sympatico.ca> wrote:
It never ceases to amaze me how some people can be on this planet for half a
century and never learn a damned thing.
Hey, sweety, being female you still have about 28 years to cram. Don't
give up.
-----
Laura
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Gays get anoth -Bob gets a "***** SLAP" with his own stupidity |
16 Dec 2003 01:19:14 PM |
|
|
L D Blake wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:09:11 -0700, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
You left out the only one that really matters, the one that is the basis
and reason for marriage.
Creating and raising children and forming a family from the union of
a man and woman. Thereby providing the society with its future.
Your greed focuses only on receiving unearned societal benefits at
taxpayer or corporate expense. Go pound sand.
Ok... so lets play fair... lets dissolve all those het marriages that don't
or can't produce children. Lets cut them off all spousal benefits, dump their
communal property rights and ditch their divorce rights, prohibit them from
filing joint tax returns, cut off their joint health plans and deny them
access to pensions and income protections...
Fair is fair.
But, you'd never sit still for that... would you.
Fact is, it's heterosexuals who have special rights in this society.
-----
Laura
Yep, let's play fair. Let's stop giving special rights to loud mouth
interest groups and start treating mainstream people with respect and
fairness.
Bob
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Ongapo" |
|
| Title: Re: Gays get anoth -Bob gets a "***** SLAP" with his own stupidity |
16 Dec 2003 01:50:37 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 12:59:36 -0500, L D Blake
<ldblake@JUNKBLOCK.sympatico.ca> wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:09:11 -0700, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
You left out the only one that really matters, the one that is the basis
and reason for marriage.
Creating and raising children and forming a family from the union of
a man and woman. Thereby providing the society with its future.
Your greed focuses only on receiving unearned societal benefits at
taxpayer or corporate expense. Go pound sand.
Ok... so lets play fair... lets dissolve all those het marriages that don't
or can't produce children. Lets cut them off all spousal benefits, dump their
communal property rights and ditch their divorce rights, prohibit them from
filing joint tax returns, cut off their joint health plans and deny them
access to pensions and income protections...
Fair is fair.
But, you'd never sit still for that... would you.
Fact is, it's heterosexuals who have special rights in this society.
You are thoroughly confused about how heterosexual societies function,
dear girl. I suggest that you do some serious reading about the
advantages of a heterosexual dominated society vs one dominated by
homosexuals, bi-sexuals, transvestites and other sexually perverted
behaviors. Will you do that? It's for your own benefit...
-----
Laura
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rick" |
|
| Title: Re: Gays get anoth -Bob gets a "***** SLAP" with his own stupidity |
16 Dec 2003 02:11:48 PM |
|
|
<Al Ongapo> wrote in message news:da1f11b2166e160280c5bf58c5804112@news.teranews.com...
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 12:59:36 -0500, L D Blake
<ldblake@JUNKBLOCK.sympatico.ca> wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:09:11 -0700, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
You left out the only one that really matters, the one that is the basis
and reason for marriage.
Creating and raising children and forming a family from the union of
a man and woman. Thereby providing the society with its future.
Your greed focuses only on receiving unearned societal benefits at
taxpayer or corporate expense. Go pound sand.
Ok... so lets play fair... lets dissolve all those het marriages that don't
or can't produce children. Lets cut them off all spousal benefits, dump their
communal property rights and ditch their divorce rights, prohibit them from
filing joint tax returns, cut off their joint health plans and deny them
access to pensions and income protections...
Fair is fair.
But, you'd never sit still for that... would you.
Fact is, it's heterosexuals who have special rights in this society.
You are thoroughly confused about how heterosexual societies function,
dear girl. I suggest that you do some serious reading about the
advantages of a heterosexual dominated society vs one dominated by
homosexuals, bi-sexuals, transvestites and other sexually perverted
behaviors. Will you do that? It's for your own benefit...
Dominated? Yet another Freudian slip. You're a freaking
closet case.
BTW nature makes ~90% of us heterosexual. Always has.
Always will. Let us know as soon as "Boys Gone Wild"
appears on our cable TV, then we'll start worrying about
"homosexual dominated society".
Rick
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Ongapo" |
|
| Title: Re: Gays get anoth -Bob gets a "***** SLAP" with his own stupidity |
16 Dec 2003 03:52:40 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 12:11:48 -0800, "Rick" <me@privacy.net> wrote:
<Al Ongapo> wrote in message news:da1f11b2166e160280c5bf58c5804112@news.teranews.com...
(...)
You are thoroughly confused about how heterosexual societies function,
dear girl. I suggest that you do some serious reading about the
advantages of a heterosexual dominated society vs one dominated by
homosexuals, bi-sexuals, transvestites and other sexually perverted
behaviors. Will you do that? It's for your own benefit...
Dominated? Yet another Freudian slip. You're a freaking
closet case.
Not surprising that you make that association. Most people, however,
whose lives are not dominated by their sexual perversion and
promiscuity as are homosexuals like you, focus on another definition
Dominate [ dómm- nŕyt ] (past domˇiˇnatˇed, past participle
domˇiˇnatˇed, present participle domˇiˇnatˇing, 3rd person present
singular domˇiˇnates)
transitive and intransitive verb
1. be prominent: to be the most important aspect or element of
something
2. be influential: to have a prevailing influence on.
"You frigging freak."
BTW nature makes ~90% of us heterosexual. Always has.
Always will.
I think the accepted figure is 97% - Nature is relentless in
controlling misfits consequently the low number of homos.
Rick
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Gays get anoth -Bob gets a "***** SLAP" with his own stupidity |
16 Dec 2003 09:02:21 PM |
|
|
Lo, many moons past, on Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:50:37 GMT, a stranger
called by some Al Ongapo came forth and told this tale in alt.atheism
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 12:59:36 -0500, L D Blake
<ldblake@JUNKBLOCK.sympatico.ca> wrote:
Fact is, it's heterosexuals who have special rights in this society.
You are thoroughly confused about how heterosexual societies function,
dear girl. I suggest that you do some serious reading about the
advantages of a heterosexual dominated society vs one dominated by
homosexuals, bi-sexuals, transvestites and other sexually perverted
behaviors. Will you do that? It's for your own benefit...
Care to name some titles?
You do know that the vast, vast majority of transvestites are straight
men, yes? They get off on the clothes, not other guys. Most are
married.
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the
Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Gays get anoth -Bob gets a "***** SLAP" with his own stupidity |
16 Dec 2003 09:21:57 PM |
|
|
Douglas Berry wrote:
Lo, many moons past, on Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:50:37 GMT, a stranger
called by some Al Ongapo came forth and told this tale in alt.atheism
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 12:59:36 -0500, L D Blake
<ldblake@JUNKBLOCK.sympatico.ca> wrote:
Fact is, it's heterosexuals who have special rights in this society.
You are thoroughly confused about how heterosexual societies function,
dear girl. I suggest that you do some serious reading about the
advantages of a heterosexual dominated society vs one dominated by
homosexuals, bi-sexuals, transvestites and other sexually perverted
behaviors. Will you do that? It's for your own benefit...
Every society that does not encourage and ensure its next generation
ends up like the Shakers.
Bob
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Wild Bill Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: Gays get anoth -Bob gets a "***** SLAP" with his own stupidity |
16 Dec 2003 11:16:12 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 03:02:21 GMT, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:
You do know that the vast, vast majority of transvestites are straight
men, yes? They get off on the clothes, not other guys. Most are
married.
You speak from experience, penguin boy! Your favorite, a woman's
tux...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Gays get anoth -Bob gets a "***** SLAP" with his own stupidity |
17 Dec 2003 10:50:36 AM |
|
|
Lo, many moons past, on Wed, 17 Dec 2003 05:16:12 GMT, a stranger
called by some Wild Bill Taylor came forth and told this tale in
alt.atheism
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 03:02:21 GMT, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:
You do know that the vast, vast majority of transvestites are straight
men, yes? They get off on the clothes, not other guys. Most are
married.
You speak from experience, penguin boy! Your favorite, a woman's
tux...
*squak*!
The last time I wore an actual tux? Hell, almost twenty years. I
just like Aptenodytes.
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the
Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows"
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Gays get anoth -Bob gets a "***** SLAP" with his own stupidity |
16 Dec 2003 02:49:09 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:28:08 -0500, L D Blake
<ldblake@JUNKBLOCK.sympatico.ca> wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:03:22 +0100, wrote:
What they are now demanding is the very same right everybody else has.
It is a legal, secular right that is being discussed nothing more than
that.
It's a lot more than just permission to hit the sack... and in all truth it
has very little to do with having sex.
Key issues:
Inheritance rights
Pension rights
Communal property rights
Divorce rights
Child Custody and visitation
Medical benefits
Joint tax returns
Hospital Visitation
You know... all the stuff het-weds take for granted.
That is pretty much what I was indicating,
Thomas P.
None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
"But he has got nothing on," said a little child.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Wild Bill Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: Gays get anoth -Bob gets a "***** SLAP" with his own stupidity |
16 Dec 2003 01:29:07 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:28:08 -0500, L D Blake
<ldblake@JUNKBLOCK.sympatico.ca> wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:03:22 +0100, wrote:
What they are now demanding is the very same right everybody else has.
It is a legal, secular right that is being discussed nothing more than
that.
It's a lot more than just permission to hit the sack... and in all truth it
has very little to do with having sex.
Key issues:
Inheritance rights
Pension rights
Communal property rights
Divorce rights
Child Custody and visitation
Medical benefits
Joint tax returns
Hospital Visitation
You know... all the stuff het-weds take for granted.
Yes, all the STUFF which they deserve because het-sexual-relationship
are essential to the survival of the species[1]. Homosexual *****
fucking is not, it's merely a dangerous sport.
[1] From Loving v. State of Virginia, (1967) Marriage is one of the
"basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our very EXISTENCE AND
SURVIVAL .
-----
Laura
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rick" |
|
| Title: Re: Gays get anoth -Bob gets a "***** SLAP" with his own stupidity |
16 Dec 2003 01:44:37 PM |
|
|
<Wild Bill Taylor> wrote in message news:5043828baef2d19981177cba5693f9ae@news.teranews.com...
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:28:08 -0500, L D Blake
<ldblake@JUNKBLOCK.sympatico.ca> wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:03:22 +0100, wrote:
What they are now demanding is the very same right everybody else has.
It is a legal, secular right that is being discussed nothing more than
that.
It's a lot more than just permission to hit the sack... and in all truth it
has very little to do with having sex.
Key issues:
Inheritance rights
Pension rights
Communal property rights
Divorce rights
Child Custody and visitation
Medical benefits
Joint tax returns
Hospital Visitation
You know... all the stuff het-weds take for granted.
Yes, all the STUFF which they deserve because het-sexual-relationship
are essential to the survival of the species[1]. Homosexual *****
fucking is not, it's merely a dangerous sport.
Another homophobic closet case with anal sex fantasies.
Yawn. I've seen far too many of them over the years.
[1] From Loving v. State of Virginia, (1967) Marriage is one of the
"basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our very EXISTENCE AND
SURVIVAL .
So by your flawed logic, marriage licenses should be denied
to infertile opposite-sex couples. Tell us, "Bill", why doesn't
the state deny marriage licenses denied to infertile opposite-sex
couples?
Rick
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wild Bill Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: Gays get anoth -Bob gets a "***** SLAP" with his own stupidity |
16 Dec 2003 03:35:05 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:44:37 -0800, "Rick" <me@privacy.net> wrote:
<Wild Bill Taylor> wrote in message news:5043828baef2d19981177cba5693f9ae@news.teranews.com...
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:28:08 -0500, L D Blake
<ldblake@JUNKBLOCK.sympatico.ca> wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:03:22 +0100, wrote:
What they are now demanding is the very same right everybody else has.
It is a legal, secular right that is being discussed nothing more than
that.
It's a lot more than just permission to hit the sack... and in all truth it
has very little to do with having sex.
Key issues:
Inheritance rights
Pension rights
Communal property rights
Divorce rights
Child Custody and visitation
Medical benefits
Joint tax returns
Hospital Visitation
You know... all the stuff het-weds take for granted.
Yes, all the STUFF which they deserve because het-sexual-relationship
are essential to the survival of the species[1]. Homosexual *****
fucking is not, it's merely a dangerous sport.
Another homophobic closet case with anal sex fantasies.
Yawn. I've seen far too many of them over the years.
[1] From Loving v. State of Virginia, (1967) Marriage is one of the
"basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our very EXISTENCE AND
SURVIVAL .
So by your flawed logic, marriage licenses should be denied
to infertile opposite-sex couples. Tell us, "Bill", why doesn't
the state deny marriage licenses denied to infertile opposite-sex
couples?
Another heterophobic closet case with het-sex fantasies.
Yawn. I've seen far too many of them over the years
Rick
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Gays get anoth -Bob gets a "***** SLAP" with his own stupidity |
16 Dec 2003 10:24:09 PM |
|
|
Lo, many moons past, on Tue, 16 Dec 2003 21:35:05 GMT, a stranger
called by some Wild Bill Taylor came forth and told this tale in
alt.atheism
So by your flawed logic, marriage licenses should be denied
to infertile opposite-sex couples. Tell us, "Bill", why doesn't
the state deny marriage licenses denied to infertile opposite-sex
couples?
Another heterophobic closet case with het-sex fantasies.
Yawn. I've seen far too many of them over the years
Bill, answer the question please. Why doesn't the state deny marriage
licenses denied to infertile opposite-sex couples?
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the
Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wild Bill Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: Gays get anoth -Bob gets a "***** SLAP" with his own stupidity |
17 Dec 2003 12:30:44 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 04:24:09 GMT, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:
Lo, many moons past, on Tue, 16 Dec 2003 21:35:05 GMT, a stranger
called by some Wild Bill Taylor came forth and told this tale in
alt.atheism
So by your flawed logic, marriage licenses should be denied
to infertile opposite-sex couples. Tell us, "Bill", why doesn't
the state deny marriage licenses denied to infertile opposite-sex
couples?
Another heterophobic closet case with het-sex fantasies.
Yawn. I've seen far too many of them over the years
Bill, answer the question please. Why doesn't the state deny marriage
licenses denied to infertile opposite-sex couples?
Because they meet the male+female requirement of the state's law.
Homosexual don't. Similar to the requirement that all playing member
of the WPGA be women. No men allowed. Marriage in the US -- One man
and one woman only. No same sex couples allowed. Is that really TOO
difficult for you to understand, bone-head?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
