Religions > Atheism > Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote.
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Randy Jabsco" |
| Date: |
12 Dec 2003 03:02:24 PM |
| Object: |
Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
Hey, I thought you faggots said that people were "accepting" you now.
What's this all about? I thought you faggots said that "ignorance to old
beliefs are making way". Come on faggots, explain this... I don't
understand. If people love faggots so much, why would over two-thirds vote
otherwise? Why is there currently 38 states with anti-gay marriage laws,
all properly voted for by the public? I am having troubles understanding
why the only way faggots can appear to be accepted is by finding a
sympathetic judge to scratch out laws for them. Can't you get the
"accepting" public to vote for them for you? Why isn't it that the faggots
aren't putting these issues on the ballets rather than taking it to
sympathetic judges and congress men?
===
Ohio House passes anti-gay marriage bill
COLUMBUS -- Gay marriage would be banned and state employees could not
obtain health insurance and other benefits for unmarried partners under a
bill passed by the Ohio House on Wednesday.
The measure, approved by a 73-23 vote, would recognize marriage as a union
"between one man and one woman" and declare that extending benefits for
unmarried partners to state employees, whether of the same or opposite sex,
is against state policy.
Supporters of the measure point toward the possibility of other states
approving homosexual unions as the impetus for Ohio to set its own standards
for marriage.
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court last month declared that state's
gay marriage ban unconstitutional and ordered lawmakers to extend the legal
benefits of marriage to domestic partners.
But opponents called the bill discrimination.
House minority leader Rep. Chris Redfern, D-Catawba Island, said committee
hearings on the bill were filled with "hate filled language and bigoted
comments" about homosexuals.
"I cannot allow myself to be aligned with that," he said. "I have respect
for my fellow members ... but I don't want them to be the morality police."
Redfern added that considering society's 50-percent divorce rate, it's hard
to argue that the issue is about upholding the sanctity of marriage.
.
|
|
| User: "Dave" |
|
| Title: Re: Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
13 Dec 2003 04:49:59 AM |
|
|
"Randy Jabsco" <RandyJabsco@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<brdaas$tkb$0@pita.alt.net>...
Hey, I thought you faggots said that people were "accepting" you now.
What's this all about? I thought you faggots said that "ignorance to old
beliefs are making way". Come on faggots, explain this... I don't
understand. If people love faggots so much, why would over two-thirds vote
otherwise? Why is there currently 38 states with anti-gay marriage laws,
all properly voted for by the public? I am having troubles understanding
why the only way faggots can appear to be accepted is by finding a
sympathetic judge to scratch out laws for them. Can't you get the
"accepting" public to vote for them for you? Why isn't it that the faggots
aren't putting these issues on the ballets rather than taking it to
sympathetic judges and congress men?
===
Ohio House passes anti-gay marriage bill
COLUMBUS -- Gay marriage would be banned [...]
Seems to me that Gays are quite clueless when it comes to politics,
public opinion, and the promotion of their cause. Did women's rights
marches include women dressed in absurd lewd costumes? Are Gays
perhaps inherently stupid?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Peacenik" |
|
| Title: Re: Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
14 Dec 2003 02:16:50 PM |
|
|
"Dave" <galt_57@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5591d176.0312130249.33969573@posting.google.com...
Seems to me that Gays are quite clueless when it comes to politics,
public opinion, and the promotion of their cause. Did women's rights
marches include women dressed in absurd lewd costumes? Are Gays
perhaps inherently stupid?
I see. You are also opposed to FREEDOM. You apparently think that people
don't have the right to wear what they please.
--
Peacenik
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dionisio" |
|
| Title: Re: Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
13 Dec 2003 09:04:22 AM |
|
|
Dave wrote:
Seems to me that Gays are quite clueless when it comes to politics,
public opinion, and the promotion of their cause. Did women's rights
marches include women dressed in absurd lewd costumes? Are Gays
perhaps inherently stupid?
Well, if you review footage from some of the movie "news reel" coverage,
some of those crazy broads wore pants. That was a clear indication of
their mental instability, I mean, they thought they were men! And
several of them made their livings on their own, which marked them as
identifying with the role of "provider." Another clearly abnormal and
deviant mental situation. Talk about stupid!
(This post has been brought to you by Sarcastic Posters Anonymous, the
number 2, and the letters "F" and "U," and by the very helpful phrase,
"What's for dinner?" Additional support comes from the Men's Sewing
Circle, and from readers like you. Thank you.)
--
I accidentally misplaced my Christmas list. Now I have no idea who my
friends are. Worse, if I should give a gift to an enemy, he'll
immediately suspect it's a "going away present" and might do something
rash... I hate the holidays.
-- Dionisio, 1996
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
14 Dec 2003 06:05:12 PM |
|
|
Lo, many moons past, on 13 Dec 2003 02:49:59 -0800, a stranger called
by some (Dave) came forth and told this tale in
alt.atheism
Seems to me that Gays are quite clueless when it comes to politics,
public opinion, and the promotion of their cause. Did women's rights
marches include women dressed in absurd lewd costumes? Are Gays
perhaps inherently stupid?
No, women just burned lingerie in public. Pretty outlandish, for the
time.
As for the absud lewd costumes; that's about 10% of any pride parade.
Oddly, they never show the GLBT veterans marching, or the local gay
hopital workers, or the always massive PFLAG (Parents, Family, and
Firends of Lesbians and Gays.) (Yes, they are missing a F in the
acronym.
There are also local politicians, marching bands, choirs.. a great
deal of fun. But straights prefer to focus on the pretty boy dancers.
And straights all scream "show your tits" at Mardi Gras because
they're there for the excellent jazz music. Sure.
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the
Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
14 Dec 2003 04:54:11 PM |
|
|
On 13 Dec 2003 02:49:59 -0800, (Dave) posted in
alt.atheism:
Seems to me that Gays are quite clueless when it comes to politics,
public opinion, and the promotion of their cause. Did women's rights
marches include women dressed in absurd lewd costumes?
Yes, some of them, but men like looking at half-dressed women.
Are Gays perhaps inherently stupid?
Or inherently honest?
(I know - my comment is as bigoted as Dave's.)
--
"Christianity has already had the chance to govern
the world according to its own ethical standards.
It was called the "Dark Ages".
- Bill, The Avender
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jefferson Brady" |
|
| Title: Re: Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
13 Dec 2003 06:34:28 AM |
|
|
On 13 Dec 2003 02:49:59 -0800, (Dave) wrote:
"Randy Jabsco" <RandyJabsco@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<brdaas$tkb$0@pita.alt.net>...
Hey, I thought you faggots said that people were "accepting" you now.
What's this all about? I thought you faggots said that "ignorance to old
beliefs are making way". Come on faggots, explain this... I don't
understand. If people love faggots so much, why would over two-thirds vote
otherwise? Why is there currently 38 states with anti-gay marriage laws,
all properly voted for by the public? I am having troubles understanding
why the only way faggots can appear to be accepted is by finding a
sympathetic judge to scratch out laws for them. Can't you get the
"accepting" public to vote for them for you? Why isn't it that the faggots
aren't putting these issues on the ballets rather than taking it to
sympathetic judges and congress men?
===
Ohio House passes anti-gay marriage bill
COLUMBUS -- Gay marriage would be banned [...]
Seems to me that Gays are quite clueless when it comes to politics,
public opinion, and the promotion of their cause. Did women's rights
marches include women dressed in absurd lewd costumes? Are Gays
perhaps inherently stupid?
Fortunately, public opinion doesn't matter where the Constitution is
concerned. Very soon, this disparity will be set right by the 'equal
protection' clause of the 14th amendment.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lord Calvert" |
|
| Title: Re: Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
13 Dec 2003 12:17:12 PM |
|
|
Fortunately, public opinion doesn't matter where the Constitution is
concerned. Very soon, this disparity will be set right by the 'equal
protection' clause of the 14th amendment.
It already was...36 years ago in Loving v. Virginia. The Supreme Court, in a
9-0 decision, upheld that government had no power to regulate marriage.
Unanimous decisions by the court are generally considered exceptionally solid
law.
The idea of government telling its populace who they can and cannot marry is
repugnant to a free society. It smacks of Communist totalitarianism and
eugenics. The People's Republic of China has strict regulation regarding
marriage and the state has the ultimate authority in decisionmaking. Is that
the sort of society we want?
Rich Goranson, Amherst, NY, USA (aa#MCMXCIX, a-vet#1)
EAC Department of Applied Rattan Use
"Without faith we might relapse into scientific or rational thinking, which
leads by a slippery slope toward constitutional democracy." - Robert Anton
Wilson
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
14 Dec 2003 04:56:36 PM |
|
|
On 13 Dec 2003 18:17:12 GMT, forlornh@aol.complex (Lord Calvert)
posted in alt.atheism:
The idea of government telling its populace who they can and cannot marry is
repugnant to a free society. It smacks of Communist totalitarianism and
eugenics. The People's Republic of China has strict regulation regarding
marriage and the state has the ultimate authority in decisionmaking. Is that
the sort of society we want?
It's the society bigots, and other fundamentalists, want as long as
they get to make the rules.
--
"A stupid man's report of what a clever man says is never accurate because he
unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand."
-- Bertrand Russell.
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Polish Prince \Not Bobby Vinton" |
|
| Title: Re: Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
13 Dec 2003 05:39:36 AM |
|
|
They are Flamboyant, "In Your Face", and Very
Distasteful. Obscene Clowns. An Oddity, shoved
down our throats as "Normal". You figure it out!
You will live with this Circus. Learn to love the
performances of these Mis-Gendered Trapeze
Artists. They have no Safety Net, They fall
upon the HIV, concrete floor. You, "Taxpayer" pay,
Millions of Dollars, every year, to watch this Bizarre
performance. They spread the Most Horrific Disease
of the Millennium, but they do not give a Damn!
They are Self-Destructive.
"Dave" <galt_57@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5591d176.0312130249.33969573@posting.google.com...
"Randy Jabsco" <RandyJabsco@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<brdaas$tkb$0@pita.alt.net>...
Hey, I thought you faggots said that people were "accepting" you now.
What's this all about? I thought you faggots said that "ignorance to
old
beliefs are making way". Come on faggots, explain this... I don't
understand. If people love faggots so much, why would over two-thirds
vote
otherwise? Why is there currently 38 states with anti-gay marriage
laws,
all properly voted for by the public? I am having troubles
understanding
why the only way faggots can appear to be accepted is by finding a
sympathetic judge to scratch out laws for them. Can't you get the
"accepting" public to vote for them for you? Why isn't it that the
faggots
aren't putting these issues on the ballets rather than taking it to
sympathetic judges and congress men?
===
Ohio House passes anti-gay marriage bill
COLUMBUS -- Gay marriage would be banned [...]
Seems to me that Gays are quite clueless when it comes to politics,
public opinion, and the promotion of their cause. Did women's rights
marches include women dressed in absurd lewd costumes? Are Gays
perhaps inherently stupid?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
13 Dec 2003 11:34:34 AM |
|
|
"Polish Prince (Not Bobby Vinton)" <wawrzekski@worldnet.att.net> wrote in
message news:YTCCb.447194$0v4.20819412@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
They are Flamboyant, "In Your Face", and Very
Distasteful. Obscene Clowns. An Oddity, shoved
down our throats as "Normal". You figure it out!
You will live with this Circus. Learn to love the
performances of these Mis-Gendered Trapeze
Artists. They have no Safety Net, They fall
upon the HIV, concrete floor. You, "Taxpayer" pay,
Millions of Dollars, every year, to watch this Bizarre
performance. They spread the Most Horrific Disease
of the Millennium, but they do not give a Damn!
They are Self-Destructive.
Some are (in the parades which you do not have to watch.)
Most behave as most people do and yoou have gay acquaintainces that you
would say you like until you found out.
<snip>
Seems to me that Gays are quite clueless when it comes to politics,
public opinion, and the promotion of their cause. Did women's rights
marches include women dressed in absurd lewd costumes? Are Gays
perhaps inherently stupid
Gay rights seem to be doing quite well thank you. Even in my red necked part
of the world there is wide acceptance and people with your type of hated are
getting quieter.
Few people like you speak out unless it is safe.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jefferson Brady" |
|
| Title: Re: Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
13 Dec 2003 06:38:49 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 11:39:36 GMT, "Polish Prince \(Not Bobby Vinton\)"
<wawrzekski@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
They are Flamboyant, "In Your Face", and Very
Distasteful. Obscene Clowns. An Oddity, shoved
down our throats as "Normal".
Shoved down your throat? Were you tied to a pole and forced to watch
them or something?
You figure it out!
figure what out?
You will live with this Circus. Learn to love the
performances of these Mis-Gendered Trapeze
Artists. They have no Safety Net, They fall
upon the HIV, concrete floor.
You do realize don't you that the primary transmission method in the
world is via heterosexual sex?
You, "Taxpayer" pay,
Millions of Dollars, every year, to watch this Bizarre
performance.
Really? the government pays for these parades and things?
They spread the Most Horrific Disease
of the Millennium, but they do not give a Damn!
THe disease is also spread via heterosexual sex, needle use and blood
transfusions. The disease has nothing to do with sexual orientation,
it just happened to strike the gay community in the US first. That's
not the case in the world at large. Perhaps yo are letting your hatred
and bigotry cloud your judgement.
They are Self-Destructive.
"Dave" <galt_57@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5591d176.0312130249.33969573@posting.google.com...
"Randy Jabsco" <RandyJabsco@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<brdaas$tkb$0@pita.alt.net>...
Hey, I thought you faggots said that people were "accepting" you now.
What's this all about? I thought you faggots said that "ignorance to
old
beliefs are making way". Come on faggots, explain this... I don't
understand. If people love faggots so much, why would over two-thirds
vote
otherwise? Why is there currently 38 states with anti-gay marriage
laws,
all properly voted for by the public? I am having troubles
understanding
why the only way faggots can appear to be accepted is by finding a
sympathetic judge to scratch out laws for them. Can't you get the
"accepting" public to vote for them for you? Why isn't it that the
faggots
aren't putting these issues on the ballets rather than taking it to
sympathetic judges and congress men?
===
Ohio House passes anti-gay marriage bill
COLUMBUS -- Gay marriage would be banned [...]
Seems to me that Gays are quite clueless when it comes to politics,
public opinion, and the promotion of their cause. Did women's rights
marches include women dressed in absurd lewd costumes? Are Gays
perhaps inherently stupid?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Randy Jabsco" |
|
| Title: Re: Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
15 Dec 2003 01:36:12 PM |
|
|
Just as I thought, nobody could answer. Everytime I see a fag claim victory
over winning the ***** war, it reminds me of Sadam Hussein claiming victory
over the American Forces. What a laugh...
"Randy Jabsco" <RandyJabsco@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:brdaas$tkb$0@pita.alt.net...
Hey, I thought you faggots said that people were "accepting" you now.
What's this all about? I thought you faggots said that "ignorance to old
beliefs are making way". Come on faggots, explain this... I don't
understand. If people love faggots so much, why would over two-thirds
vote
otherwise? Why is there currently 38 states with anti-gay marriage laws,
all properly voted for by the public? I am having troubles understanding
why the only way faggots can appear to be accepted is by finding a
sympathetic judge to scratch out laws for them. Can't you get the
"accepting" public to vote for them for you? Why isn't it that the
faggots
aren't putting these issues on the ballets rather than taking it to
sympathetic judges and congress men?
===
Ohio House passes anti-gay marriage bill
COLUMBUS -- Gay marriage would be banned and state employees could not
obtain health insurance and other benefits for unmarried partners under a
bill passed by the Ohio House on Wednesday.
The measure, approved by a 73-23 vote, would recognize marriage as a union
"between one man and one woman" and declare that extending benefits for
unmarried partners to state employees, whether of the same or opposite
sex,
is against state policy.
Supporters of the measure point toward the possibility of other states
approving homosexual unions as the impetus for Ohio to set its own
standards
for marriage.
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court last month declared that state's
gay marriage ban unconstitutional and ordered lawmakers to extend the
legal
benefits of marriage to domestic partners.
But opponents called the bill discrimination.
House minority leader Rep. Chris Redfern, D-Catawba Island, said committee
hearings on the bill were filled with "hate filled language and bigoted
comments" about homosexuals.
"I cannot allow myself to be aligned with that," he said. "I have respect
for my fellow members ... but I don't want them to be the morality
police."
Redfern added that considering society's 50-percent divorce rate, it's
hard
to argue that the issue is about upholding the sanctity of marriage.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
15 Dec 2003 01:55:22 PM |
|
|
Randy Jabsco wrote:
Just as I thought, nobody could answer. Everytime I see a fag claim victory
over winning the ***** war, it reminds me of Sadam Hussein claiming victory
over the American Forces. What a laugh...
LOL. It does remind one of Baghdad Bob's speeches doesn't it. ;-)
False hope springs eternal.
Bob
"Randy Jabsco" <RandyJabsco@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:brdaas$tkb$0@pita.alt.net...
Hey, I thought you faggots said that people were "accepting" you now.
What's this all about? I thought you faggots said that "ignorance to old
beliefs are making way". Come on faggots, explain this... I don't
understand. If people love faggots so much, why would over two-thirds
vote
otherwise? Why is there currently 38 states with anti-gay marriage laws,
all properly voted for by the public? I am having troubles understanding
why the only way faggots can appear to be accepted is by finding a
sympathetic judge to scratch out laws for them. Can't you get the
"accepting" public to vote for them for you? Why isn't it that the
faggots
aren't putting these issues on the ballets rather than taking it to
sympathetic judges and congress men?
===
Ohio House passes anti-gay marriage bill
COLUMBUS -- Gay marriage would be banned and state employees could not
obtain health insurance and other benefits for unmarried partners under a
bill passed by the Ohio House on Wednesday.
The measure, approved by a 73-23 vote, would recognize marriage as a union
"between one man and one woman" and declare that extending benefits for
unmarried partners to state employees, whether of the same or opposite
sex,
is against state policy.
Supporters of the measure point toward the possibility of other states
approving homosexual unions as the impetus for Ohio to set its own
standards
for marriage.
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court last month declared that state's
gay marriage ban unconstitutional and ordered lawmakers to extend the
legal
benefits of marriage to domestic partners.
But opponents called the bill discrimination.
House minority leader Rep. Chris Redfern, D-Catawba Island, said committee
hearings on the bill were filled with "hate filled language and bigoted
comments" about homosexuals.
"I cannot allow myself to be aligned with that," he said. "I have respect
for my fellow members ... but I don't want them to be the morality
police."
Redfern added that considering society's 50-percent divorce rate, it's
hard
to argue that the issue is about upholding the sanctity of marriage.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "MarkA" |
|
| Title: Re: Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
14 Dec 2003 12:01:02 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:02:24 +0000, Randy Jabsco wrote:
Ohio House passes anti-gay marriage bill
COLUMBUS -- Gay marriage would be banned and state employees could not
obtain health insurance and other benefits for unmarried partners under a
bill passed by the Ohio House on Wednesday.
<snip>
The more I hear about Ohio, the more glad I am that I don't live there.
--
MarkA
(still caught in the maze of twisty little passages, all different)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jefferson Brady" |
|
| Title: Re: Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
12 Dec 2003 03:08:22 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:02:24 -0800, "Randy Jabsco"
<RandyJabsco@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hey, I thought you faggots said that people were "accepting" you now.
What's this all about? I thought you faggots said that "ignorance to old
beliefs are making way".
Gay marriage will happen despite the ranting of bigoted lunatics like
you. Luckily, we have a Constitution that guarantees equal protection
under the law. Jus like segregation , this bigotry will soon be
outlawed.
Come on faggots, explain this... I don't
understand. If people love faggots so much, why would over two-thirds vote
otherwise? Why is there currently 38 states with anti-gay marriage laws,
all properly voted for by the public? I am having troubles understanding
why the only way faggots can appear to be accepted is by finding a
sympathetic judge to scratch out laws for them. Can't you get the
"accepting" public to vote for them for you? Why isn't it that the faggots
aren't putting these issues on the ballets rather than taking it to
sympathetic judges and congress men?
===
Ohio House passes anti-gay marriage bill
COLUMBUS -- Gay marriage would be banned and state employees could not
obtain health insurance and other benefits for unmarried partners under a
bill passed by the Ohio House on Wednesday.
The measure, approved by a 73-23 vote, would recognize marriage as a union
"between one man and one woman" and declare that extending benefits for
unmarried partners to state employees, whether of the same or opposite sex,
is against state policy.
Supporters of the measure point toward the possibility of other states
approving homosexual unions as the impetus for Ohio to set its own standards
for marriage.
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court last month declared that state's
gay marriage ban unconstitutional and ordered lawmakers to extend the legal
benefits of marriage to domestic partners.
But opponents called the bill discrimination.
House minority leader Rep. Chris Redfern, D-Catawba Island, said committee
hearings on the bill were filled with "hate filled language and bigoted
comments" about homosexuals.
"I cannot allow myself to be aligned with that," he said. "I have respect
for my fellow members ... but I don't want them to be the morality police."
Redfern added that considering society's 50-percent divorce rate, it's hard
to argue that the issue is about upholding the sanctity of marriage.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Beserker Rage BeserkerRage@nordicseas" |
|
| Title: Re: Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
12 Dec 2003 04:20:07 PM |
|
|
"Jefferson Brady" <rightiswrong@home.org> wrote in message
news:3fe22dca.5460859@news.west.earthlink.net...
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:02:24 -0800, "Randy Jabsco"
<RandyJabsco@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hey, I thought you faggots said that people were "accepting" you now.
What's this all about? I thought you faggots said that "ignorance to old
beliefs are making way".
Gay marriage will happen despite the ranting of bigoted lunatics like
you. Luckily, we have a Constitution that guarantees equal protection
under the law. Jus like segregation , this bigotry will soon be
outlawed.
Should we also protect people who are into fucking corpses and animals and
children?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel Kolle" |
|
| Title: Re: Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
12 Dec 2003 10:04:57 PM |
|
|
"Beserker Rage" <BeserkerRage@nordicseas> thought hard and said:
"Jefferson Brady" <rightiswrong@home.org> wrote in message
news:3fe22dca.5460859@news.west.earthlink.net...
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:02:24 -0800, "Randy Jabsco"
<RandyJabsco@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hey, I thought you faggots said that people were "accepting" you now.
What's this all about? I thought you faggots said that "ignorance to old
beliefs are making way".
Gay marriage will happen despite the ranting of bigoted lunatics like
you. Luckily, we have a Constitution that guarantees equal protection
under the law. Jus like segregation , this bigotry will soon be
outlawed.
Should we also protect people who are into fucking corpses and animals and
children?
Corpses are dead. Animals cannot talk. Need I go on?
--
-Daniel "Mr. Brevity" Kolle; 15 A.A. #2035
Koji Kondo, Yo-Yo Ma, Gustav Mahler, and Krzysztof Penderecki are my Gods.
Madly Insane EAC Scientist.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cat Lover none" |
|
| Title: Re: Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
12 Dec 2003 10:29:32 PM |
|
|
Daniel Kolle <DKolle@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:lu3ltvcgfuu5if0rl4b0oaqf4c4recjhgp@4ax.com:
"Beserker Rage" <BeserkerRage@nordicseas> thought hard and said:
"Jefferson Brady" <rightiswrong@home.org> wrote in message
news:3fe22dca.5460859@news.west.earthlink.net...
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:02:24 -0800, "Randy Jabsco"
<RandyJabsco@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hey, I thought you faggots said that people were "accepting" you
now. What's this all about? I thought you faggots said that
"ignorance to old beliefs are making way".
Gay marriage will happen despite the ranting of bigoted lunatics
like you. Luckily, we have a Constitution that guarantees equal
protection under the law. Jus like segregation , this bigotry will
soon be outlawed.
Should we also protect people who are into fucking corpses and animals
and children?
Corpses are dead. Animals cannot talk. Need I go on?
Mutes can't talk. Neither can many deaf people. Nor some handicapped
people. Should quadraplegics not be allowed to marry in your world?
My cat loves me! Don't tell me otherwise. And I love him! Yes, it is a
gay, beastial relationship. But we are in love!
I can tell by the way he purrs and shares my bed at night.
So, why can't we get married?
Why can't a man marry more than one woman? How come? Why do you feel so
threatened by that? If everyone is willing, why not?
Who's yer daddy, boy?!
King of SCAA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
14 Dec 2003 03:35:20 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 04:29:32 GMT, Cat Lover <none> posted in
alt.atheism:
My cat loves me! Don't tell me otherwise. And I love him! Yes, it is a
gay, beastial relationship. But we are in love!
I can tell by the way he purrs and shares my bed at night.
So, why can't we get married?
He can't give informed consent.
--
"To surrender to ignorance and call it God has always been premature, and it remains
premature today."
- Isaac Asimov
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jefferson Brady" |
|
| Title: Re: Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
12 Dec 2003 10:59:34 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 04:29:32 GMT, Cat Lover <none> wrote:
Daniel Kolle <DKolle@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:lu3ltvcgfuu5if0rl4b0oaqf4c4recjhgp@4ax.com:
"Beserker Rage" <BeserkerRage@nordicseas> thought hard and said:
"Jefferson Brady" <rightiswrong@home.org> wrote in message
news:3fe22dca.5460859@news.west.earthlink.net...
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:02:24 -0800, "Randy Jabsco"
<RandyJabsco@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hey, I thought you faggots said that people were "accepting" you
now. What's this all about? I thought you faggots said that
"ignorance to old beliefs are making way".
Gay marriage will happen despite the ranting of bigoted lunatics
like you. Luckily, we have a Constitution that guarantees equal
protection under the law. Jus like segregation , this bigotry will
soon be outlawed.
Should we also protect people who are into fucking corpses and animals
and children?
Corpses are dead. Animals cannot talk. Need I go on?
Mutes can't talk. Neither can many deaf people. Nor some handicapped
people. Should quadraplegics not be allowed to marry in your world?
If they can give legal consent they can marry. If they are unable to
give legal consent, they can't be married.
My cat loves me! Don't tell me otherwise. And I love him! Yes, it is a
gay, beastial relationship. But we are in love!
Your cat can't give legal consent so you can't marry it.
I can tell by the way he purrs and shares my bed at night.
So, why can't we get married?
Your cat is incapable of providing legal consent but if you are
having sex with it perhaps you should put up a web cam, I'm sure it
would be very popular, you could make a fortune.
Why can't a man marry more than one woman?
Good question.I think that he should be able to mary more then one
women and women should be able to marry more then one man. I see no
compelling reason for the state to say otherwise.
How come? Why do you feel so
threatened by that?
Where did he say that he was threatened by polygamy? Perhaps a reading
comprehension course would benefit you..
If everyone is willing, why not?
Agreed. Why not?
Who's yer daddy, boy?!
Who his daddy is has no relevance to the conversation.
King of SCAA
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
14 Dec 2003 03:35:16 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 22:04:57 -0600, Daniel Kolle <DKolle@hotmail.com>
posted in alt.atheism:
"Beserker Rage" <BeserkerRage@nordicseas> thought hard and said:
Should we also protect people who are into fucking corpses and animals and
children?
Corpses are dead. Animals cannot talk. Need I go on?
Change "talk" to "give informed consent". Many people can't talk.
--
"To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus
was not born of a virgin."
Cardinal Bellarmine,[1615, during the trial of Galileo]
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Wild Bill Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
12 Dec 2003 11:39:06 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 22:04:57 -0600, Daniel Kolle <DKolle@hotmail.com>
wrote:
"Beserker Rage" <BeserkerRage@nordicseas> thought hard and said:
"Jefferson Brady" <rightiswrong@home.org> wrote in message
news:3fe22dca.5460859@news.west.earthlink.net...
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:02:24 -0800, "Randy Jabsco"
<RandyJabsco@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hey, I thought you faggots said that people were "accepting" you now.
What's this all about? I thought you faggots said that "ignorance to old
beliefs are making way".
Gay marriage will happen despite the ranting of bigoted lunatics like
you. Luckily, we have a Constitution that guarantees equal protection
under the law. Jus like segregation , this bigotry will soon be
outlawed.
Should we also protect people who are into fucking corpses and animals and
children?
Corpses are dead. Animals cannot talk. Need I go on?
Please do -- you seem to be chocked full of things that the average
homosexual doesn't know. I'm sure they will greatly appreciate the
education talks from you. Can you take it to email though. Maybe start
a list, you know. The only reason I suggest that is because here you
are A BORING *****!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
14 Dec 2003 03:35:26 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 05:39:06 GMT, Wild Bill Taylor posted in
alt.atheism:
The only reason I suggest that is because here you
are A BORING *****!!
"Here" includes more than the newsgroup you read. If you don't want
to read his posts, don't.
--
"The doctrine that the earth is neither the center of the universe nor immovable, but
moves even with a daily rotation, is absurd, and both philosophically and theologically
false, and at the least an error of faith."
- Catholic Church's decision against Galileo Galilei
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel Kolle" |
|
| Title: Re: Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
13 Dec 2003 05:25:04 PM |
|
|
Wild Bill Taylor thought hard and said:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 22:04:57 -0600, Daniel Kolle <DKolle@hotmail.com>
wrote:
"Beserker Rage" <BeserkerRage@nordicseas> thought hard and said:
"Jefferson Brady" <rightiswrong@home.org> wrote in message
news:3fe22dca.5460859@news.west.earthlink.net...
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:02:24 -0800, "Randy Jabsco"
<RandyJabsco@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hey, I thought you faggots said that people were "accepting" you now.
What's this all about? I thought you faggots said that "ignorance to old
beliefs are making way".
Gay marriage will happen despite the ranting of bigoted lunatics like
you. Luckily, we have a Constitution that guarantees equal protection
under the law. Jus like segregation , this bigotry will soon be
outlawed.
Should we also protect people who are into fucking corpses and animals and
children?
Corpses are dead. Animals cannot talk. Need I go on?
Please do -- you seem to be chocked full of things that the average
homosexual doesn't know. I'm sure they will greatly appreciate the
education talks from you. Can you take it to email though. Maybe start
a list, you know. The only reason I suggest that is because here you
are A BORING *****!!
Wow. You sound mad.
--
-Daniel "Mr. Brevity" Kolle; 15 A.A. #2035
Koji Kondo, Yo-Yo Ma, Gustav Mahler, and Krzysztof Penderecki are my Gods.
Madly Insane EAC Scientist.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Light Templar" |
|
| Title: Re: Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
12 Dec 2003 05:06:11 PM |
|
|
"Beserker Rage" <BeserkerRage@nordicseas> wrote in message
news:96560d39cfd70f704f0884cf60dde9f4@news.teranews.com...
"Jefferson Brady" <rightiswrong@home.org> wrote in message
news:3fe22dca.5460859@news.west.earthlink.net...
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:02:24 -0800, "Randy Jabsco"
<RandyJabsco@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hey, I thought you faggots said that people were "accepting" you now.
What's this all about? I thought you faggots said that "ignorance to
old
beliefs are making way".
Gay marriage will happen despite the ranting of bigoted lunatics like
you. Luckily, we have a Constitution that guarantees equal protection
under the law. Jus like segregation , this bigotry will soon be
outlawed.
Should we also protect people who are into fucking corpses and animals and
children?
Corpses, animals, and children cannot give informed consent. Since there
is no direct comparison, your
analogy falls flat.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dennis Kemmerer" |
|
| Title: Re: Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
12 Dec 2003 05:02:01 PM |
|
|
"Beserker Rage" <BeserkerRage@nordicseas> wrote in message
news:96560d39cfd70f704f0884cf60dde9f4@news.teranews.com...
"Jefferson Brady" <rightiswrong@home.org> wrote in message
news:3fe22dca.5460859@news.west.earthlink.net...
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:02:24 -0800, "Randy Jabsco"
<RandyJabsco@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hey, I thought you faggots said that people were "accepting" you now.
What's this all about? I thought you faggots said that "ignorance to
old
beliefs are making way".
Gay marriage will happen despite the ranting of bigoted lunatics like
you. Luckily, we have a Constitution that guarantees equal protection
under the law. Jus like segregation , this bigotry will soon be
outlawed.
Should we also protect people who are into fucking corpses and animals and
children?
Another idiot who doesn't understand informed/age of consent.
[plonk]
.
|
|
|
| User: "Light Templar" |
|
| Title: Re: Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
12 Dec 2003 05:17:27 PM |
|
|
"Dennis Kemmerer" <dk@suespammers.org> wrote in message
news:brdhjp$2atrs$1@ID-120990.news.uni-berlin.de...
"Beserker Rage" <BeserkerRage@nordicseas> wrote in message
news:96560d39cfd70f704f0884cf60dde9f4@news.teranews.com...
"Jefferson Brady" <rightiswrong@home.org> wrote in message
news:3fe22dca.5460859@news.west.earthlink.net...
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:02:24 -0800, "Randy Jabsco"
<RandyJabsco@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hey, I thought you faggots said that people were "accepting" you now.
What's this all about? I thought you faggots said that "ignorance to
old
beliefs are making way".
Gay marriage will happen despite the ranting of bigoted lunatics like
you. Luckily, we have a Constitution that guarantees equal protection
under the law. Jus like segregation , this bigotry will soon be
outlawed.
Should we also protect people who are into fucking corpses and animals
and
children?
Another idiot who doesn't understand informed/age of consent.
[plonk]
Yep, seems to be a lot of them crawling out of the woodwork lately. These
morons should start a support group
to keep each other informed or something.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ken&Laura Chaddock" |
|
| Title: Re: Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
12 Dec 2003 07:16:37 PM |
|
|
Beserker Rage wrote:
"Jefferson Brady" <rightiswrong@home.org> wrote in message
news:3fe22dca.5460859@news.west.earthlink.net...
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:02:24 -0800, "Randy Jabsco"
<RandyJabsco@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hey, I thought you faggots said that people were "accepting" you now.
What's this all about? I thought you faggots said that "ignorance to old
beliefs are making way".
Gay marriage will happen despite the ranting of bigoted lunatics like
you. Luckily, we have a Constitution that guarantees equal protection
under the law. Jus like segregation , this bigotry will soon be
outlawed.
Should we also protect people who are into fucking corpses and animals and
children?
Different situation and you know it...neither a corpse, nor an animal
nor a child can *consent* to the sex therefore the "sex" is really
*rape* and can (with excellent moral justification) be easily prohibited
by law...
....Ken
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Graham Kennedy" |
|
| Title: Re: Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
12 Dec 2003 05:26:04 PM |
|
|
Beserker Rage wrote:
"Jefferson Brady" <rightiswrong@home.org> wrote in message
news:3fe22dca.5460859@news.west.earthlink.net...
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:02:24 -0800, "Randy Jabsco"
<RandyJabsco@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hey, I thought you faggots said that people were "accepting" you now.
What's this all about? I thought you faggots said that "ignorance to old
beliefs are making way".
Gay marriage will happen despite the ranting of bigoted lunatics like
you. Luckily, we have a Constitution that guarantees equal protection
under the law. Jus like segregation , this bigotry will soon be
outlawed.
Should we also protect people who are into fucking corpses and animals and
children?
Of course not, since they can't give informed consent.
--
Graham Kennedy
Creator and Author,
Daystrom Institute Technical Library
http://www.ditl.org
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gregory Gadow" |
|
| Title: Re: Another anti-gay marriage bill passes by over 75% of the vote. |
12 Dec 2003 04:59:21 PM |
|
|
Beserker Rage wrote:
"Jefferson Brady" <rightiswrong@home.org> wrote in message
news:3fe22dca.5460859@news.west.earthlink.net...
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:02:24 -0800, "Randy Jabsco"
<RandyJabsco@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hey, I thought you faggots said that people were "accepting" you now.
What's this all about? I thought you faggots said that "ignorance to old
beliefs are making way".
Gay marriage will happen despite the ranting of bigoted lunatics like
you. Luckily, we have a Constitution that guarantees equal protection
under the law. Jus like segregation , this bigotry will soon be
outlawed.
Should we also protect people who are into fucking corpses and animals and
children?
Neither children nor animals nor corpses are capable of giving consent.
--
Gregory Gadow
techbear@serv.net
http://www.serv.net/~techbear
"If you make yourself a sheep, the wolves will eat you."
-- Benjamin Franklin
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
