Another Conservative Jumping Off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part XVII (re: Why Are NeoCons So Incompetent?)



 Religions > Atheism > Another Conservative Jumping Off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part XVII (re: Why Are NeoCons So Incompetent?)

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Yang, AthD h.c"
Date: 19 Jul 2004 04:33:58 AM
Object: Another Conservative Jumping Off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part XVII (re: Why Are NeoCons So Incompetent?)
"Famous academic Francis Fukuyama, one of the founding fathers of the
neo-conservative movement that underlies the policies of US President
George W. Bush's administration, said on July 13 that he would not
vote for the incumbent in the November 2 US Presidential election. "
http://www.zaman.com/?bl=international&alt=&trh=20040714&hn=10372
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Socerey Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: -3 million jobs and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -893 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.

User: "Tomaxo"

Title: Re: Another Conservative Jumping Off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part XVII (re: Why Are NeoCons So Incompetent?) 20 Jul 2004 12:03:46 AM
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message news:<o25nf09pgg2vfjql85maf9bvqh1flvbtlu@4ax.com>...

"Famous academic Francis Fukuyama, one of the founding fathers of the
neo-conservative movement that underlies the policies of US President
George W. Bush's administration, said on July 13 that he would not
vote for the incumbent in the November 2 US Presidential election. "

http://www.zaman.com/?bl=international&alt=&trh=20040714&hn=10372


-----

Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Socerey Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec

The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: -3 million jobs and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -893 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting

Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless

I don't think there's much to the persistant outcry we are hearing as
of late regarding Conservatives and Neo-Conservatives saying they are
no longer supporting Bush. I believe this to be only a face saving
gesture on the part of people who pride themselves on backing
"winners". It is like publicly changing your bet during the final
seconds of a horse race. These people will certainly vote for Bush
though, even while stating otherwise, and will let you know they did
the moment he wins (if he does).
What this does mean for Democrats though is that they have definitely
struck fear into the until-only-recently arrogant, pompous and cocky
heart of the Republican party. Republicans at the highest levels are
starting to bet against Bush winning. They are preparing themselves
so they can later say it was because he "wasn't Conservative enough",
when in reality it was because he was too far from the Center.
.
User: "Yang, AthD h.c"

Title: Re: Another Conservative Jumping Off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part XVII (re: Why Are NeoCons So Incompetent?) 22 Jul 2004 01:52:36 AM
On 19 Jul 2004 22:03:46 -0700,
(Tomaxo) wrote:

"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message news:<o25nf09pgg2vfjql85maf9bvqh1flvbtlu@4ax.com>...

"Famous academic Francis Fukuyama, one of the founding fathers of the
neo-conservative movement that underlies the policies of US President
George W. Bush's administration, said on July 13 that he would not
vote for the incumbent in the November 2 US Presidential election. "

http://www.zaman.com/?bl=international&alt=&trh=20040714&hn=10372


I don't think there's much to the persistant outcry we are hearing as
of late regarding Conservatives and Neo-Conservatives saying they are
no longer supporting Bush. I believe this to be only a face saving
gesture on the part of people who pride themselves on backing
"winners". It is like publicly changing your bet during the final
seconds of a horse race. These people will certainly vote for Bush
though, even while stating otherwise, and will let you know they did
the moment he wins (if he does).

What this does mean for Democrats though is that they have definitely
struck fear into the until-only-recently arrogant, pompous and cocky
heart of the Republican party. Republicans at the highest levels are
starting to bet against Bush winning. They are preparing themselves
so they can later say it was because he "wasn't Conservative enough",
when in reality it was because he was too far from the Center.

He would have cruised to reelection had he not tried a) fight this non
sequitur war in Iraq and b) done this so badly.
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Socerey Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: -3 million jobs and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -900 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
User: "stoney"

Title: Re: Another Conservative Jumping Off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part XVII (re: Why Are NeoCons So Incompetent?) 22 Jul 2004 04:22:36 PM
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 23:52:36 -0700, Yang, AthD (h.c) wrote:

On 19 Jul 2004 22:03:46 -0700,

(Tomaxo) wrote:

"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message news:<o25nf09pgg2vfjql85maf9bvqh1flvbtlu@4ax.com>...

"Famous academic Francis Fukuyama, one of the founding fathers of the
neo-conservative movement that underlies the policies of US President
George W. Bush's administration, said on July 13 that he would not
vote for the incumbent in the November 2 US Presidential election. "

http://www.zaman.com/?bl=international&alt=&trh=20040714&hn=10372


I don't think there's much to the persistant outcry we are hearing as
of late regarding Conservatives and Neo-Conservatives saying they are
no longer supporting Bush. I believe this to be only a face saving
gesture on the part of people who pride themselves on backing
"winners". It is like publicly changing your bet during the final
seconds of a horse race. These people will certainly vote for Bush
though, even while stating otherwise, and will let you know they did
the moment he wins (if he does).

What this does mean for Democrats though is that they have definitely
struck fear into the until-only-recently arrogant, pompous and cocky
heart of the Republican party. Republicans at the highest levels are
starting to bet against Bush winning. They are preparing themselves
so they can later say it was because he "wasn't Conservative enough",
when in reality it was because he was too far from the Center.


He would have cruised to reelection had he not tried a) fight this non
sequitur war in Iraq and b) done this so badly.

Agreed, ***** stained Constitution or not.
.
User: "Gary J. English"

Title: Re: Another Conservative Jumping Off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part XVII (re: Why Are NeoCons So Incompetent?) 22 Jul 2004 06:27:43 PM
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 14:22:36 -0700, "stoney" <stoney@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
Quit responding/crossposting this crap. If you wish to discuss this, post it in the
national political newsgroups forums, there's plenty of them.
Let the state newsgroups discuss state politics. Besides, national political
newsgroups are further reaching.

On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 23:52:36 -0700, Yang, AthD (h.c) wrote:

On 19 Jul 2004 22:03:46 -0700,

(Tomaxo) wrote:

"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message news:<o25nf09pgg2vfjql85maf9bvqh1flvbtlu@4ax.com>...

"Famous academic Francis Fukuyama, one of the founding fathers of the
neo-conservative movement that underlies the policies of US President
George W. Bush's administration, said on July 13 that he would not
vote for the incumbent in the November 2 US Presidential election. "

http://www.zaman.com/?bl=international&alt=&trh=20040714&hn=10372


I don't think there's much to the persistant outcry we are hearing as
of late regarding Conservatives and Neo-Conservatives saying they are
no longer supporting Bush. I believe this to be only a face saving
gesture on the part of people who pride themselves on backing
"winners". It is like publicly changing your bet during the final
seconds of a horse race. These people will certainly vote for Bush
though, even while stating otherwise, and will let you know they did
the moment he wins (if he does).

What this does mean for Democrats though is that they have definitely
struck fear into the until-only-recently arrogant, pompous and cocky
heart of the Republican party. Republicans at the highest levels are
starting to bet against Bush winning. They are preparing themselves
so they can later say it was because he "wasn't Conservative enough",
when in reality it was because he was too far from the Center.


He would have cruised to reelection had he not tried a) fight this non
sequitur war in Iraq and b) done this so badly.


Agreed, ***** stained Constitution or not.

.
User: "stoney"

Title: Re: Another Conservative Jumping Off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part XVII (re: Why Are NeoCons So Incompetent?) 23 Jul 2004 08:45:53 PM
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 23:27:43 +0000, Gary J. English wrote:

On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 14:22:36 -0700, "stoney" <stoney@localhost.localdomain> wrote:

Quit responding/crossposting this crap. If you wish to discuss this, post it in the
national political newsgroups forums, there's plenty of them.

Let the state newsgroups discuss state politics. Besides, national political
newsgroups are further reaching.

*****. I didn't start the thread so don't ***** at me about it. If
you don't like it have the fucking courage to either ignore the thread or
engage filters. If you want to ***** to someone, ***** to the person who
started the fucking thread.
.






  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Re: Another Conservative Jumping Off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part XVII (re: Why Are NeoCons So Incompetent?)
Another Conservative Jumping Off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part XXII (re: Why Are NeoCons so Incompetent?)
Another Conservative Jumping Off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part XII (re: Why Are NeoCons So Imcompetent?)
Another Conservative Jumping Off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part XIII (re: Why Are NeoCons So Imcompetent?)
Another Conservative Jumping Off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part XXV (re: Why Are Neocons So Incompetent?)
Another Intelligent Conservative Jumping Off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part XXXI (re: Why Are NeoCons So Incompetent?)
Another Conservative Jumping Off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part X (re: Why Are NeoCons So Imcompetent?)
Another Conservative Jumping Off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part XXII (re: Why Are NeoCons so Incompetent?)
Another Conservative Jumping Off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part VIII (re: Why Are NeoCons So Imcompetent?)
Another Conservative Jumping Off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part XIX (re: Why Are NeoCons so Incompetent?)
Another Conservative Jumping Off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part XI (re: Why Are NeoCons So Imcompetent?)
Another Conservative Jumping Off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part XXVII (re: Why Are NeoCons So Incompetent?)
Another Intelligent Conservative Jumping Off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part XXX (re: Why Are NeoCons So Incompetent?)
Another Conservative Jumping Off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part XXVIII (re: Why Are NeoCons So Incompetent?)
Another Conservative Jumping Off of Bush's Sinking Ship Part XXIX (re: Why Are NeoCons So Incompetent?)
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER