Another Example of God's Incompetence



 Religions > Atheism > Another Example of God's Incompetence

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Budikka"
Date: 25 Aug 2003 10:07:15 PM
Object: Another Example of God's Incompetence
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3153475.stm
reveals that "Our ability to smell and taste is regulated by around
1,000 genes, over half of which are totally inactive."
I guess this is another fine example of God's miraculous design. What
was it the creationists were saying about *all* DNA being useful?
We cannot smell as competently as a dog. We cannot see as well as a
bird of prey. We cannot hear as well as a bat or see in the dark as
well as a cat. We cannot run as fast as a gazelle or even climb as
well as a gecko.
We can't fly or even glide. We can't survive underwater despite the
fact that Earth's habitat is some 92% aquatic. We can't detect
infrared that many snakes can. We can't see ultraviolet that many
insects can. We're not as populous as some worms. We're not provided
with the immune system of a shark. We cannot grow new limbs. We
don't even know instinctively when pregnancy is likely and when it's
not, as every other animal seems to.
How can we be even remotely called the pinnacle of creation when in
everything but the size of our ego, we are inferior? Creationists
think all this is somehow evidence of design. They're wrong. But
what it does prove about creationists is that their one remaining
advantage, the ability to outthink other species, has been surrendered
along with everything else.
Budikka
.

User: "Dr. DuFonet"

Title: Re: Another Example of God's Incompetence 26 Aug 2003 09:52:05 AM
"Budikka" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:e1e30450.0308251907.31abb522@posting.google.com...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3153475.stm
reveals that "Our ability to smell and taste is regulated by around
1,000 genes, over half of which are totally inactive."

I guess this is another fine example of God's miraculous design. What
was it the creationists were saying about *all* DNA being useful?

We cannot smell as competently as a dog. We cannot see as well as a
bird of prey. We cannot hear as well as a bat or see in the dark as
well as a cat. We cannot run as fast as a gazelle or even climb as
well as a gecko.

We can't fly or even glide. We can't survive underwater despite the
fact that Earth's habitat is some 92% aquatic. We can't detect
infrared that many snakes can. We can't see ultraviolet that many
insects can. We're not as populous as some worms. We're not provided
with the immune system of a shark. We cannot grow new limbs. We
don't even know instinctively when pregnancy is likely and when it's
not, as every other animal seems to.

How can we be even remotely called the pinnacle of creation when in
everything but the size of our ego, we are inferior?

Speak for yourself.

Creationists
think all this is somehow evidence of design. They're wrong. But
what it does prove about creationists is that their one remaining
advantage, the ability to outthink other species, has been surrendered
along with everything else.

Budikka

.
User: "ArWeGod"

Title: Re: Another Example of God's Incompetence 27 Aug 2003 05:04:57 AM
"Dr. DuFonet" <accordiondoc@mindsproing.cop> wrote in message
news:puK2b.4151$Jh2.260@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...


"Budikka" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:e1e30450.0308251907.31abb522@posting.google.com...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3153475.stm
reveals that "Our ability to smell and taste is regulated by around
1,000 genes, over half of which are totally inactive."

I guess this is another fine example of God's miraculous design. What
was it the creationists were saying about *all* DNA being useful?

We cannot smell as competently as a dog. We cannot see as well as a
bird of prey. We cannot hear as well as a bat or see in the dark as
well as a cat. We cannot run as fast as a gazelle or even climb as
well as a gecko.

We can't fly or even glide. We can't survive underwater despite the
fact that Earth's habitat is some 92% aquatic. We can't detect
infrared that many snakes can. We can't see ultraviolet that many
insects can. We're not as populous as some worms. We're not provided
with the immune system of a shark. We cannot grow new limbs. We
don't even know instinctively when pregnancy is likely and when it's
not, as every other animal seems to.

How can we be even remotely called the pinnacle of creation when in
everything but the size of our ego, we are inferior?


Speak for yourself.

Creationists
think all this is somehow evidence of design. They're wrong. But
what it does prove about creationists is that their one remaining
advantage, the ability to outthink other species, has been surrendered
along with everything else.

Budikka

If you are on Earth, and you are next to 3 other creatures, one will be a
beetle.
If a god created the dominant creature to resemble itself, God is a beetle.
I wonder if She's a ladybug...
.... I suspect a dung beetle.
--
ArWeGod
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER