| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Fred Stone" |
| Date: |
13 Apr 2005 02:19:48 PM |
| Object: |
Another Gay-Bashing Politician |
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/299104p-255983c.html
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"You know you're over the target when you start receiving flak."
.
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Gay-Bashing Politician |
13 Apr 2005 02:48:10 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/299104p-255983c.html
You know, "fred," you are one sick mother fucker.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jeremy Martin" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Gay-Bashing Politician |
14 Apr 2005 08:34:09 PM |
|
|
(Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>):
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/299104p-255983c.html
I think it's pretty damn appropriate considering that a gay
republican is pretty amusing.
--
Jeremy Martin
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jos Flachs no x, please" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Gay-Bashing Politician |
15 Apr 2005 02:51:49 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:34:09 -0500, Jeremy Martin
<harhar@pirates-ahoy.com> wrote:
(Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>):
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/299104p-255983c.html
I think it's pretty damn appropriate considering that a gay
republican is pretty amusing.
Not really. Hoover was -in all likelihood- gay and so was Ernest
Roehm, leader of the SA.
The worst persecutors of gays are regretfully gay.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Gay-Bashing Politician |
16 Apr 2005 06:23:15 AM |
|
|
Jos Flachs (no x, please) wrote:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:34:09 -0500, Jeremy Martin
<harhar@pirates-ahoy.com> wrote:
(Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>):
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/299104p-255983c.html
I think it's pretty damn appropriate considering that a gay
republican is pretty amusing.
Not really. Hoover was -in all likelihood- gay and so was Ernest
Roehm, leader of the SA.
Hoover...for a gay person, that name must suck. Or blow.
The worst persecutors of gays are regretfully gay.
They're probably the types who like rough trade.
Bob Dog
-----
Divine retribution is an idol threat.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gregory Gadow" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Gay-Bashing Politician |
15 Apr 2005 01:13:56 PM |
|
|
Jos Flachs wrote:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:34:09 -0500, Jeremy Martin
<harhar@pirates-ahoy.com> wrote:
(Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>):
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/299104p-255983c.html
I think it's pretty damn appropriate considering that a gay
republican is pretty amusing.
Not really. Hoover was -in all likelihood- gay and so was Ernest
Roehm, leader of the SA.
The worst persecutors of gays are regretfully gay.
Do not forget Roy Cohn, Senator Joe McCarthy's right hand man, a "known
homosexual" who made persecuting gay people an important part of
McCarthy's communist witch-hunt.
--
Gregory Gadow
techbear@serv.net
http://www.serv.net/~techbear
"[T]hose who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves;
and, under the rule of a just God, cannot long retain it."
-- Pres. George W. Bush, Hypocrite, his inauguration speech, 2005
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gregory Gadow" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Gay-Bashing Politician |
13 Apr 2005 02:47:34 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/299104p-255983c.html
Ah, I see. Bill Clinton points out the hypocricy of a man who has worked
for some of the most homophobic politicians in the United States, who
has been the brains behind some of the most bigoted and hate-filled
homophobic political and social campaigns the United States has seen in
decades and who then gets legally married to his long time male partner,
and *Clinton* is the gay bashing politician.
--
Gregory Gadow
techbear@serv.net
http://www.serv.net/~techbear
"[T]hose who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves;
and, under the rule of a just God, cannot long retain it."
-- Pres. George W. Bush, Hypocrite, his inauguration speech, 2005
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Gay-Bashing Politician |
13 Apr 2005 03:00:30 PM |
|
|
"Gregory Gadow" <techbear@serv.net> wrote
Fred Stone wrote:
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/299104p-255983c.html
Ah, I see. Bill Clinton points out the hypocricy of a man who
has worked for some of the most homophobic politicians in
the United States, who has been the brains behind some of
the most bigoted and hate-filled homophobic political and
social campaigns the United States has seen in decades and
who then gets legally married to his long time male partner,
and *Clinton* is the gay bashing politician.
You don't understand. "Fred" thinks he's being funny.
If it weren't for stuff like this, "Fred" would have to get
all of his laughs from the local cancer ward.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Gay-Bashing Politician |
13 Apr 2005 05:19:45 PM |
|
|
Gregory Gadow <techbear@serv.net> wrote in
news:425D3106.EE288C6D@serv.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/299104p-255983c.html
Ah, I see. Bill Clinton points out the hypocricy of a man who has
worked for some of the most homophobic politicians in the United
States, who has been the brains behind some of the most bigoted and
hate-filled homophobic political and social campaigns the United
States has seen in decades and who then gets legally married to his
long time male partner, and *Clinton* is the gay bashing politician.
Yep.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"You know you're over the target when you start receiving flak."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gregory Gadow" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Gay-Bashing Politician |
13 Apr 2005 07:24:45 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
Gregory Gadow <techbear@serv.net> wrote in
news:425D3106.EE288C6D@serv.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/299104p-255983c.html
Ah, I see. Bill Clinton points out the hypocricy of a man who has
worked for some of the most homophobic politicians in the United
States, who has been the brains behind some of the most bigoted and
hate-filled homophobic political and social campaigns the United
States has seen in decades and who then gets legally married to his
long time male partner, and *Clinton* is the gay bashing politician.
Yep.
That is like you saying that anyone who points out how Bush and his
administration have worked to shred the Constitution is a traitor who
should be shot.
Oh. You've said that, too.
--
Gregory Gadow
techbear@serv.net
http://www.serv.net/~techbear
"[T]hose who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves;
and, under the rule of a just God, cannot long retain it."
-- Pres. George W. Bush, Hypocrite, his inauguration speech, 2005
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Gay-Bashing Politician |
13 Apr 2005 08:09:39 PM |
|
|
Gregory Gadow <techbear@serv.net> wrote in
news:425D71FD.A31E0C91@serv.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
Gregory Gadow <techbear@serv.net> wrote in
news:425D3106.EE288C6D@serv.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/299104p-255983c.html
Ah, I see. Bill Clinton points out the hypocricy of a man who has
worked for some of the most homophobic politicians in the United
States, who has been the brains behind some of the most bigoted and
hate-filled homophobic political and social campaigns the United
States has seen in decades and who then gets legally married to his
long time male partner, and *Clinton* is the gay bashing
politician.
Yep.
That is like you saying that anyone who points out how Bush and his
administration have worked to shred the Constitution is a traitor who
should be shot.
No, it's more like me saying that Democrats think they own homosexuals
and blacks and can therefore make demeaning comments about them when
they stray off the plantation.
Oh. You've said that, too.
No, I have not. Feel free to cite me on those specific words. Google is
my friend.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"You know you're over the target when you start receiving flak."
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Gay-Bashing Politician |
14 Apr 2005 05:17:20 AM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
No, it's more like me saying that Democrats think
they own homosexuals and blacks
No, but I will say that any gay or black person who
votes Republican deserves to be shot.
That doesn't mean that the Democrats own them. It
just means that they're on the order of "Jews for
Hitler" if they vote Republican.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Divin Marquis" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Gay-Bashing Politician |
14 Apr 2005 08:31:11 AM |
|
|
Le Thu, 14 Apr 2005 01:17:20 -0400, JTEM a écrit :
No, but I will say that any gay or black person who votes Republican
deserves to be shot.
Not if they're extremely rich. Republican elites are actually liberal
for themselves in private; if their daughters need abortions, be assured
they'll fly them to whichever place still performs them in a jiffy.
That doesn't mean that the Democrats own them. It just means that they're
on the order of "Jews for Hitler" if they vote Republican.
Well, that's the difference. Hitler was an "equal-opportunity" murderer.
He killed the rich jews just as well as the poor. Remember that he
actually wrote down his program in his book, and actually did what he said.
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Gay-Bashing Politician |
14 Apr 2005 11:37:57 AM |
|
|
"Divin Marquis" <postmaster@127.0.0.1> wrote
Le Thu, 14 Apr 2005 01:17:20 -0400, JTEM a écrit :
No, but I will say that any gay or black person who votes
Republican deserves to be shot.
Not if they're extremely rich. Republican elites are actually liberal
for themselves in private; if their daughters need abortions, be assured
they'll fly them to whichever place still performs them in a jiffy.
That makes it worse. That means they're doing it out of malice.
So, in that sense, shooting them would be too quick (and painless)
a death.
Maybe if we staked them next to a fire ant colony and covered
them with honey....
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: Another Gay-Bashing Politician |
14 Apr 2005 01:31:03 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 07:37:57 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
wrote:
"Divin Marquis" <postmaster@127.0.0.1> wrote
Le Thu, 14 Apr 2005 01:17:20 -0400, JTEM a écrit :
No, but I will say that any gay or black person who votes
Republican deserves to be shot.
Not if they're extremely rich. Republican elites are actually liberal
for themselves in private; if their daughters need abortions, be assured
they'll fly them to whichever place still performs them in a jiffy.
That makes it worse. That means they're doing it out of malice.
So, in that sense, shooting them would be too quick (and painless)
a death.
Maybe if we staked them next to a fire ant colony and covered
them with honey....
Essentially it means that the entire republican platform is
essentially based on corruption and fascism.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Gay-Bashing Politician |
16 Apr 2005 01:45:00 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 07:37:57 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
wrote:
"Divin Marquis" <postmaster@127.0.0.1> wrote
Le Thu, 14 Apr 2005 01:17:20 -0400, JTEM a écrit :
No, but I will say that any gay or black person who votes
Republican deserves to be shot.
Not if they're extremely rich. Republican elites are actually liberal
for themselves in private; if their daughters need abortions, be assured
they'll fly them to whichever place still performs them in a jiffy.
That makes it worse. That means they're doing it out of malice.
So, in that sense, shooting them would be too quick (and painless)
a death.
Maybe if we staked them next to a fire ant colony and covered
them with honey....
Now you're being cruel to ants.......
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Gay-Bashing Politician |
14 Apr 2005 01:12:01 PM |
|
|
Divin Marquis <postmaster@127.0.0.1> wrote in
news:pan.2005.04.14.08.31.10.798571@127.0.0.1:
Le Thu, 14 Apr 2005 01:17:20 -0400, JTEM a écrit :
No, but I will say that any gay or black person who votes Republican
deserves to be shot.
Not if they're extremely rich. Republican elites are actually liberal
for themselves in private; if their daughters need abortions, be
assured they'll fly them to whichever place still performs them in a
jiffy.
You might be surprised at how many religous people do stick to their
convictions, even Republicans.
That doesn't mean that the Democrats own them. It just means that
they're on the order of "Jews for Hitler" if they vote Republican.
Well, that's the difference. Hitler was an "equal-opportunity"
murderer. He killed the rich jews just as well as the poor. Remember
that he actually wrote down his program in his book, and actually did
what he said.
Sounds to me like it's JTEM who is the murderer here. I haven't heard Bush
threatening to kill anybody for voting Democrat. And the only beatings the
Republicans have administered to Democrats have been at the polls.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"You know you're over the target when you start receiving flak."
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Gay-Bashing Politician |
14 Apr 2005 02:03:06 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
You might be surprised at how many religous people
do stick to their convictions, even Republicans.
I know I certainly would!
Be surprised, that is.
I'm amazed at the contortions these people are capable
of, all just to do as they please and pretend that it's
somehow God's fault, that they're only doing what
God told them to do.
I mean, just look at the religious Reich. They got
started with their first organized efforts in 1979
with the "Moral Majority." Lead by a southern
Baptist, they championed the cause AGAINST a
born-again southern Baptist in favor of a divorced
Hollywood movie star... and they haven't stopped
denouncing Hollywood & movie stars since.
Well, except when they needed someone to take
the Californian Governor's seat for the Republicans.
Then Hollywood & movie stars were okay. But
only just for then.... that brief time.
Sounds to me like it's JTEM who is the murderer
here.
So your problems aren't limited to your brain, and
extend to your ears as well.
No surprise.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Divin Marquis" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Gay-Bashing Politician |
14 Apr 2005 05:30:57 PM |
|
|
Le Thu, 14 Apr 2005 13:12:01 +0000, Fred Stone a écrit :
You might be surprised at how many religous people do stick to their
convictions, even Republicans.
Yeah yeah. Right.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: Another Gay-Bashing Politician |
14 Apr 2005 02:39:03 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 13:12:01 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
Divin Marquis <postmaster@127.0.0.1> wrote in
news:pan.2005.04.14.08.31.10.798571@127.0.0.1:
Le Thu, 14 Apr 2005 01:17:20 -0400, JTEM a écrit :
No, but I will say that any gay or black person who votes Republican
deserves to be shot.
Not if they're extremely rich. Republican elites are actually liberal
for themselves in private; if their daughters need abortions, be
assured they'll fly them to whichever place still performs them in a
jiffy.
You might be surprised at how many religous people do stick to their
convictions, even Republicans.
Too bad there's very few in office or in the Bush administration.
You would think that would tell you something, but you don't seem very
interested in reality.
That doesn't mean that the Democrats own them. It just means that
they're on the order of "Jews for Hitler" if they vote Republican.
Well, that's the difference. Hitler was an "equal-opportunity"
murderer. He killed the rich jews just as well as the poor. Remember
that he actually wrote down his program in his book, and actually did
what he said.
Sounds to me like it's JTEM who is the murderer here. I haven't heard Bush
threatening to kill anybody for voting Democrat. And the only beatings the
Republicans have administered to Democrats have been at the polls.
LOL, more pretending. Uh, let's see - where is Bush now? Oh yeah,
around 40 percent approval or lower.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Gay-Bashing Politician |
14 Apr 2005 03:07:53 PM |
|
|
(Kate ) wrote in
news:42637f9b.43777437@news-west.newscene.com:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 13:12:01 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
Divin Marquis <postmaster@127.0.0.1> wrote in
news:pan.2005.04.14.08.31.10.798571@127.0.0.1:
Le Thu, 14 Apr 2005 01:17:20 -0400, JTEM a écrit :
No, but I will say that any gay or black person who votes
Republican deserves to be shot.
Not if they're extremely rich. Republican elites are actually
liberal for themselves in private; if their daughters need
abortions, be assured they'll fly them to whichever place still
performs them in a jiffy.
You might be surprised at how many religous people do stick to their
convictions, even Republicans.
Too bad there's very few in office or in the Bush administration.
Proves how little you know about it.
You would think that would tell you something, but you don't seem very
interested in reality.
Reality isn't something a gulliberal like you should mention, Kate.
That doesn't mean that the Democrats own them. It just means that
they're on the order of "Jews for Hitler" if they vote Republican.
Well, that's the difference. Hitler was an "equal-opportunity"
murderer. He killed the rich jews just as well as the poor. Remember
that he actually wrote down his program in his book, and actually
did what he said.
Sounds to me like it's JTEM who is the murderer here. I haven't heard
Bush threatening to kill anybody for voting Democrat. And the only
beatings the Republicans have administered to Democrats have been at
the polls.
LOL, more pretending. Uh, let's see - where is Bush now? Oh yeah,
around 40 percent approval or lower.
So? The Democrats are even lower, since you weren't paying attention.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"You know you're over the target when you start receiving flak."
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Gay-Bashing Politician |
16 Apr 2005 01:43:59 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:19:45 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
Gregory Gadow <techbear@serv.net> wrote in
news:425D3106.EE288C6D@serv.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/299104p-255983c.html
Ah, I see. Bill Clinton points out the hypocricy of a man who has
worked for some of the most homophobic politicians in the United
States, who has been the brains behind some of the most bigoted and
hate-filled homophobic political and social campaigns the United
States has seen in decades and who then gets legally married to his
long time male partner, and *Clinton* is the gay bashing politician.
Yep.
Fred. (spit) ***** Christian.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: Another Gay-Bashing Politician |
13 Apr 2005 07:33:03 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:19:45 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
Gregory Gadow <techbear@serv.net> wrote in
news:425D3106.EE288C6D@serv.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/299104p-255983c.html
Ah, I see. Bill Clinton points out the hypocricy of a man who has
worked for some of the most homophobic politicians in the United
States, who has been the brains behind some of the most bigoted and
hate-filled homophobic political and social campaigns the United
States has seen in decades and who then gets legally married to his
long time male partner, and *Clinton* is the gay bashing politician.
Yep.
LOL Fred. Another plank in your hypocracy set down in concrete.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Gay-Bashing Politician |
13 Apr 2005 08:14:31 PM |
|
|
(Kate ) wrote in news:42607396.155907421@news-
west.newscene.com:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:19:45 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
Gregory Gadow <techbear@serv.net> wrote in
news:425D3106.EE288C6D@serv.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/299104p-255983c.html
Ah, I see. Bill Clinton points out the hypocricy of a man who has
worked for some of the most homophobic politicians in the United
States, who has been the brains behind some of the most bigoted and
hate-filled homophobic political and social campaigns the United
States has seen in decades and who then gets legally married to his
long time male partner, and *Clinton* is the gay bashing politician.
Yep.
LOL Fred. Another plank in your hypocracy set down in concrete.
LOL yourself. I guess it doesn't occur to you that some homosexuals
might have other priorities than voting Democratic?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"You know you're over the target when you start receiving flak."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: Another Gay-Bashing Politician |
14 Apr 2005 12:22:02 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 20:14:31 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
cobalt@newscene.com (Kate ) wrote in news:42607396.155907421@news-
west.newscene.com:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:19:45 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
Gregory Gadow <techbear@serv.net> wrote in
news:425D3106.EE288C6D@serv.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/299104p-255983c.html
Ah, I see. Bill Clinton points out the hypocricy of a man who has
worked for some of the most homophobic politicians in the United
States, who has been the brains behind some of the most bigoted and
hate-filled homophobic political and social campaigns the United
States has seen in decades and who then gets legally married to his
long time male partner, and *Clinton* is the gay bashing politician.
Yep.
LOL Fred. Another plank in your hypocracy set down in concrete.
LOL yourself. I guess it doesn't occur to you that some homosexuals
might have other priorities than voting Democratic?
What has that got to do with it?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Gay-Bashing Politician |
14 Apr 2005 12:27:43 PM |
|
|
(Kate ) wrote in
news:4265b75d.173258218@news-west.newscene.com:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 20:14:31 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
(Kate ) wrote in news:42607396.155907421@news-
west.newscene.com:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:19:45 GMT, Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
Gregory Gadow <techbear@serv.net> wrote in
news:425D3106.EE288C6D@serv.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/299104p-255983c.html
Ah, I see. Bill Clinton points out the hypocricy of a man who has
worked for some of the most homophobic politicians in the United
States, who has been the brains behind some of the most bigoted
and hate-filled homophobic political and social campaigns the
United States has seen in decades and who then gets legally
married to his long time male partner, and *Clinton* is the gay
bashing politician.
Yep.
LOL Fred. Another plank in your hypocracy set down in concrete.
LOL yourself. I guess it doesn't occur to you that some homosexuals
might have other priorities than voting Democratic?
What has that got to do with it?
DUH. Maybe Arthur Finkelstein finds Hillary and the other Democrats'
stands on other issues to be so repulsive that it outweighs the single
issue of gay marriage.
People who aren't simpleminded gulliberals are able to evaluate
political candidates on more than the one issue that the Democrats
choose for them.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"You know you're over the target when you start receiving flak."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: Another Gay-Bashing Politician |
14 Apr 2005 01:26:03 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 12:27:43 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
cobalt@newscene.com (Kate ) wrote in
news:4265b75d.173258218@news-west.newscene.com:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 20:14:31 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
cobalt@newscene.com (Kate ) wrote in news:42607396.155907421@news-
west.newscene.com:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:19:45 GMT, Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
Gregory Gadow <techbear@serv.net> wrote in
news:425D3106.EE288C6D@serv.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/299104p-255983c.html
Ah, I see. Bill Clinton points out the hypocricy of a man who has
worked for some of the most homophobic politicians in the United
States, who has been the brains behind some of the most bigoted
and hate-filled homophobic political and social campaigns the
United States has seen in decades and who then gets legally
married to his long time male partner, and *Clinton* is the gay
bashing politician.
Yep.
LOL Fred. Another plank in your hypocracy set down in concrete.
LOL yourself. I guess it doesn't occur to you that some homosexuals
might have other priorities than voting Democratic?
What has that got to do with it?
DUH. Maybe Arthur Finkelstein finds Hillary and the other Democrats'
stands on other issues to be so repulsive that it outweighs the single
issue of gay marriage.
People who aren't simpleminded gulliberals are able to evaluate
political candidates on more than the one issue that the Democrats
choose for them.
Take off the black and white glasses Fred.
A - you don't have to work for people who hate your guts to support
other issues. You can work to change the organization that supports
all the rest (which this person most definiately didn't) or you can
choose people who support homosexuals but still support your other
issues (gasp - those actually do exist).
B - That doesn't support a charge of bigotry even if it did follow.
If I told you, you were self loathing as an atheist to work within and
help support a fundimentialist regime that actively is working to
remove your civil rights, it hardly would mean that I hate atheists.
This is why you have such problems with politics. You can't get from
A to B even with a road map. Obviously you don't want to be rational.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Gay-Bashing Politician |
14 Apr 2005 02:47:59 PM |
|
|
(Kate ) wrote in
news:425f6d41.39079406@news-west.newscene.com:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 12:27:43 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
(Kate ) wrote in
news:4265b75d.173258218@news-west.newscene.com:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 20:14:31 GMT, Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
(Kate ) wrote in news:42607396.155907421@news-
west.newscene.com:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:19:45 GMT, Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
Gregory Gadow <techbear@serv.net> wrote in
news:425D3106.EE288C6D@serv.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/299104p-255983c.html
Ah, I see. Bill Clinton points out the hypocricy of a man who
has worked for some of the most homophobic politicians in the
United States, who has been the brains behind some of the most
bigoted and hate-filled homophobic political and social
campaigns the United States has seen in decades and who then
gets legally married to his long time male partner, and
*Clinton* is the gay bashing politician.
Yep.
LOL Fred. Another plank in your hypocracy set down in concrete.
LOL yourself. I guess it doesn't occur to you that some homosexuals
might have other priorities than voting Democratic?
What has that got to do with it?
DUH. Maybe Arthur Finkelstein finds Hillary and the other Democrats'
stands on other issues to be so repulsive that it outweighs the single
issue of gay marriage.
People who aren't simpleminded gulliberals are able to evaluate
political candidates on more than the one issue that the Democrats
choose for them.
Take off the black and white glasses Fred.
<snicker>
A - you don't have to work for people who hate your guts to support
other issues. You can work to change the organization that supports
all the rest (which this person most definiately didn't) or you can
choose people who support homosexuals but still support your other
issues (gasp - those actually do exist).
Republicans don't necessarily "hate his guts". Obviously that's true,
since they employ any number of homosexuals in high offices. People like
"this guy" himself. He *is* working with the people who support his
other issues (gasp!). It's you Democrats who think that just because
they support gay marriage that that should override every other issue in
the world. Why try to swim uphill against an organization that doesn't
support 90% of your issues just because they *do* support one?
B - That doesn't support a charge of bigotry even if it did follow.
If I told you, you were self loathing as an atheist to work within and
help support a fundimentialist regime that actively is working to
remove your civil rights, it hardly would mean that I hate atheists.
It would mean that you hate atheists who won't vote your way. Nobody's
trying to revoke any rights anyway. They just don't want those "rights"
being invented by a court.
This is why you have such problems with politics. You can't get from
A to B even with a road map. Obviously you don't want to be rational.
Look who's talking. You're too prejudiced to even understand that your
whole argument works for Republicans as well as Democrats.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"You know you're over the target when you start receiving flak."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Divin Marquis" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Gay-Bashing Politician |
14 Apr 2005 05:44:13 PM |
|
|
Le Thu, 14 Apr 2005 14:47:59 +0000, Fred Stone a écrit :
B - That doesn't support a charge of bigotry even if it did follow. If I
told you, you were self loathing as an atheist to work within and help
support a fundimentialist regime that actively is working to remove your
civil rights, it hardly would mean that I hate atheists.
It would mean that you hate atheists who won't vote your way. Nobody's
trying to revoke any rights anyway. They just don't want those "rights"
being invented by a court.
"Hate"? Do you know the meaning of the word?
Or do you just through words around?
Don't answer, that was a rhetorical question.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Gay-Bashing Politician |
14 Apr 2005 05:53:52 PM |
|
|
Divin Marquis <postmaster@127.0.0.1> wrote in
news:pan.2005.04.14.17.44.13.491092@127.0.0.1:
Le Thu, 14 Apr 2005 14:47:59 +0000, Fred Stone a écrit :
B - That doesn't support a charge of bigotry even if it did follow.
If I told you, you were self loathing as an atheist to work within
and help support a fundimentialist regime that actively is working
to remove your civil rights, it hardly would mean that I hate
atheists.
It would mean that you hate atheists who won't vote your way.
Nobody's trying to revoke any rights anyway. They just don't want
those "rights" being invented by a court.
"Hate"? Do you know the meaning of the word?
Or do you just through words around?
Don't answer, that was a rhetorical question.
I merely echoed Kate's use of the word. Do you bother to pay attention
to threads? Don't answer, that was a rhetorical question.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"You know you're over the target when you start receiving flak."
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: Another Gay-Bashing Politician |
15 Apr 2005 12:48:02 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 14:47:59 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
cobalt@newscene.com (Kate ) wrote in
news:425f6d41.39079406@news-west.newscene.com:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 12:27:43 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
cobalt@newscene.com (Kate ) wrote in
news:4265b75d.173258218@news-west.newscene.com:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 20:14:31 GMT, Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
cobalt@newscene.com (Kate ) wrote in news:42607396.155907421@news-
west.newscene.com:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:19:45 GMT, Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
Gregory Gadow <techbear@serv.net> wrote in
news:425D3106.EE288C6D@serv.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/299104p-255983c.html
Ah, I see. Bill Clinton points out the hypocricy of a man who
has worked for some of the most homophobic politicians in the
United States, who has been the brains behind some of the most
bigoted and hate-filled homophobic political and social
campaigns the United States has seen in decades and who then
gets legally married to his long time male partner, and
*Clinton* is the gay bashing politician.
Yep.
LOL Fred. Another plank in your hypocracy set down in concrete.
LOL yourself. I guess it doesn't occur to you that some homosexuals
might have other priorities than voting Democratic?
What has that got to do with it?
DUH. Maybe Arthur Finkelstein finds Hillary and the other Democrats'
stands on other issues to be so repulsive that it outweighs the single
issue of gay marriage.
People who aren't simpleminded gulliberals are able to evaluate
political candidates on more than the one issue that the Democrats
choose for them.
Take off the black and white glasses Fred.
<snicker>
A - you don't have to work for people who hate your guts to support
other issues. You can work to change the organization that supports
all the rest (which this person most definiately didn't) or you can
choose people who support homosexuals but still support your other
issues (gasp - those actually do exist).
Republicans don't necessarily "hate his guts".
Uh, they said they do.
Obviously that's true,
since they employ any number of homosexuals in high offices. People like
"this guy" himself. He *is* working with the people who support his
other issues (gasp!). It's you Democrats who think that just because
they support gay marriage that that should override every other issue in
the world. Why try to swim uphill against an organization that doesn't
support 90% of your issues just because they *do* support one?
Apparently you can't read what I wrote. I'm not sure why I bother.
Try again if you think you can see through your republican insanity
glasses.
B - That doesn't support a charge of bigotry even if it did follow.
If I told you, you were self loathing as an atheist to work within and
help support a fundimentialist regime that actively is working to
remove your civil rights, it hardly would mean that I hate atheists.
It would mean that you hate atheists who won't vote your way. Nobody's
trying to revoke any rights anyway. They just don't want those "rights"
being invented by a court.
Apparently you can't read that one either.
This is why you have such problems with politics. You can't get from
A to B even with a road map. Obviously you don't want to be rational.
Look who's talking. You're too prejudiced to even understand that your
whole argument works for Republicans as well as Democrats.
LOL - OK Fred - you win even as you lose your argument. You are too
insane to talk to. It must be required to be a neo-con.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
