Religions > Atheism > Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy)
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Jason Gastrich" |
| Date: |
14 Mar 2005 12:03:51 AM |
| Object: |
Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy) |
Has anyone heard of Reggie Finley? He's also known as The Infidel Guy. He
has a web site and an internet radio program.
Reggie Finley hosts an assortment of mp3 files. He charges people money to
join for a "Gold plan" membership, then they can download these files.
Unfortunately, the Infidel Guy is unethical.
Reggie Finley is hosting a variety of my debates without permission. If he
were offering them for free, then I wouldn't have a problem with him.
However, Infidel Guy is actually charging people money before they can
download them! He's making a profit off my debates with people like Eddie
Tabash and Dan Barker.
See the following link. It's in his "Top Rated" section. Link:
http://infidelguy.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&d_op=TopRated
Without permission, Reggie Finley is charging people money before they can
hear my debate with Dan Barker. I'm offering this debate for free on my web
site. See here:
As you can see (or can't see), Finley even has keywords embedded into his
page with my name on them! If you "View Source" on that page above, you can
see these:
keywords: BIBLE, passion of the Christ critique, liberal, liberal news,
liberal radio network, logical arguments against God, questioning God,
premises, evolution, radio show host, bumper stickers, atheist audio,
infidels, mp3, mp3 downloads, atheist talk shows, atheist talk show,
freethinker radio, infidels, infidel, radio interviews, rationalist,
evolution, science, skeptic, live interviews, religion, atheism,
freethought, radio, broadcasts, atheist flash, where was God?, 911, 9-11,
atheist animation, atheist, atlanta, evolution, free, mp3 audio, streaming,
debate, debates, theology, anti-religious, audio show, news, resources,
directory, black atheists, atheism, science, radio, live radio, Real audio,
god, shows, athiest, athiesm, religion chat, live shows, real audio, show,
webcast, agnostic, Reginald V. Finley, Jesus, best atheist site, world
religions, nation, god, hot guys, skepticism, atheist radio, list of
religions, atheistguy, atheist guy, agnostic blacks, atheist models,
infidelguy, freethought radio, theinfidelguy.com, no god, religious myths,
pagan, new, egyptian mythology, the naked truth, satan, evidence for god,
against God, work from home, is God real?, new age, dios, ateist, infadel,
ask god, ask jesus, guestbook, 10 commandments, roy moore, ashera, proof
against God, god doesn't exist, god is dead, remove, legal, law, truth,
jason gastrich interview,
mike ledo, robert price, acharya s, jordan maxwell, astrotheology, bible
criticism, word of God, kent hovind, movie, dan barker, amber, finley,
christ, chrestus, cristos, christos, truth about angels, nicea, syllogisms,
budda, buddha, satan, pagan, apatheist, foxhole, 112, unbeliever, christian
audio debates, sermon audio, athiest, infidels, syllogisms, streaming audio,
atheist music, atheist forums, mushinrunshya, mushinronsha, church signs,
matrix, the bible, mushinron, biblegal, infidelwife, wifeswap, atheist
finley, amber finley, atheist in Georgia, godless wife, atheistic radio
show, wife swap
So, the Infidel Guy isn't just hosting my debate with Barker. He isn't just
selling it. He's advertising for it and hoping search engines pick his web
page up, so people will pay him for a Gold membership, then download it!
Is this kind of behavior typical among people like Reggie? Would any
atheist be bold enough to approach Reggie about his unethical behavior?
Somehow, I doubt it.
Reggie Finley is doing the same exact thing with my debate with Eddie
Tabash. He got a copy of it, put it on his web site, then began charging
people before they could hear it. Today, when I politely asked him to stop,
he ran to Eddie Tabash to ask him for permission. Eddie said ok, but I told
both of them that I'd prefer it if the debate were a FREE download.
Now, you may think it's nice that he got permission from Eddie Tabash to
sell this debate. However, what in the world took him so long? He has had
this debate for months! Doesn't Finley have any integrity? If he did, he
would have asked before he started selling it.
Finally, I've been very unimpressed with Finley's emails to me. Not once
did he apologize or concede that he was doing anything wrong. I know he's
an atheist, but I thought he had a clue about ethics.
Perhaps another atheist can set him straight. Perhaps not. If someone
does, here is his email address:
Regards,
Jason Gastrich
--
--------
Jesus Christ Saves Ministries
http://www.jcsm.org
Over 90,000 web pages!
John 8:36 reads, "Therefore if the Son makes you free, you shall be free
indeed."
Galatians 5:1 reads, "Stand fast therefore in the liberty by which Christ
has made us free, and do not be entangled again with a yoke of bondage."
ICQ#: 20731140 . AIM: MrJasonGastrich . YIM: Jesus_Saved_Jason
.
|
|
| User: "Therion Ware" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy) |
14 Mar 2005 01:38:34 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 06:03:51 GMT in alt.atheism, Jason Gastrich
("Jason Gastrich" <usenetspam1@yahoo.com>) said, directing the reply
to alt.atheism
Has anyone heard of Reggie Finley? He's also known as The Infidel Guy. He
has a web site and an internet radio program.
Reggie Finley hosts an assortment of mp3 files. He charges people money to
join for a "Gold plan" membership, then they can download these files.
Unfortunately, the Infidel Guy is unethical.
Reggie Finley is hosting a variety of my debates without permission. If he
were offering them for free, then I wouldn't have a problem with him.
However, Infidel Guy is actually charging people money before they can
download them! He's making a profit off my debates with people like Eddie
Tabash and Dan Barker.
See the following link. It's in his "Top Rated" section. Link:
http://infidelguy.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&d_op=TopRated
Without permission, Reggie Finley is charging people money before they can
hear my debate with Dan Barker. I'm offering this debate for free on my web
site. See here:
Where?
As you can see (or can't see), Finley even has keywords embedded into his
page with my name on them! If you "View Source" on that page above, you can
see these:
I'm unclear as to what your precise objection is. When you say they're
"my debates" what do you mean by that? That you own the exclusive
copyright to them? That you participated in them?
After all, presumably the other people involved in the debates have
rights over what happens to the record of them. Was there a formal
agreement of somekind as regards that?
Unless there's a copyright violation here, I wouldn't have thought
that simply charging for something someone else gives away is of
itself unethical. Or are business models that differ from your own, or
are more successful, implicitly unethical?
Perhaps you could clarify?
[snip]
--
"Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You."
- Attrib: Pauline Reage.
Inexpensive VHS & other video to CD/DVD conversion?
See: www.Video2CD.com. 35.00 gets your video on DVD.
Market Your DVD to The World For Almost Nothing: www.instantdvd.tv
** atheist poster child #1 ** #442.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Secular Fundamentalist" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy) |
14 Mar 2005 04:42:15 AM |
|
|
Therion Ware wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 06:03:51 GMT in alt.atheism, Jason Gastrich
("Jason Gastrich" <usenetspam1@yahoo.com>) said, directing the reply
to alt.atheism
Without permission, Reggie Finley is charging people money before they can
hear my debate with Dan Barker. I'm offering this debate for free on my web
site. See here:
Where?
http://media02.sa-media.com/sermons008/11802153711.mp3
--
David Silverman F.L.A.H.N.
aa #2208
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Sienkiewicz" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy) |
14 Mar 2005 04:48:15 AM |
|
|
Secular Fundamentalist wrote:
Therion Ware wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 06:03:51 GMT in alt.atheism, Jason Gastrich
("Jason Gastrich" <usenetspam1@yahoo.com>) said, directing the
reply
to alt.atheism
Without permission, Reggie Finley is charging people money before
they can
hear my debate with Dan Barker. I'm offering this debate for free
on my web
site. See here:
Where?
http://media02.sa-media.com/sermons008/11802153711.mp3
Except, as I suspect you know, this is NOT the debate getween Jason and
Dan, but Jason's after-debate spin, "answers," and plugging of his
e-book.
I did enjoy hearing this again, however. The litany of excuses at the
beginning are particularly amusing.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Phÿltêr" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy) |
14 Mar 2005 06:42:14 AM |
|
|
"Jason Gastrich" <usenetspam1@yahoo.com> astounded us with:
news:bP9Zd.39660$VD5.5611@twister.socal.rr.com:
Has anyone heard of Reggie Finley? He's also known as The Infidel Guy.
He has a web site and an internet radio program.
Reggie Finley hosts an assortment of mp3 files. He charges people money
to join for a "Gold plan" membership, then they can download these
files. Unfortunately, the Infidel Guy is unethical.
That's fucking rich coming from you, *****. Christianity wrote the BOOK
on "being unethical"
--
Phÿltêr
AA#1938
Denizen of Darkness #44 & AFJC Antipodean Attaché
Remove "s" to respond
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jason Gastrich" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy) |
14 Mar 2005 12:30:36 AM |
|
|
I accidentally hit send before I typed the FREE link to my debates:
http://sa.jcsm.org
Jason Gastrich wrote:
Has anyone heard of Reggie Finley? He's also known as The Infidel
Guy. He has a web site and an internet radio program.
Reggie Finley hosts an assortment of mp3 files. He charges people
money to join for a "Gold plan" membership, then they can download
these files. Unfortunately, the Infidel Guy is unethical.
Reggie Finley is hosting a variety of my debates without permission.
If he were offering them for free, then I wouldn't have a problem
with him. However, Infidel Guy is actually charging people money
before they can download them! He's making a profit off my debates
with people like Eddie Tabash and Dan Barker.
See the following link. It's in his "Top Rated" section. Link:
http://infidelguy.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&d_op=TopRated
Without permission, Reggie Finley is charging people money before
they can hear my debate with Dan Barker. I'm offering this debate
for free on my web site. See here:
As you can see (or can't see), Finley even has keywords embedded into
his page with my name on them! If you "View Source" on that page
above, you can see these:
keywords: BIBLE, passion of the Christ critique, liberal, liberal
news, liberal radio network, logical arguments against God,
questioning God, premises, evolution, radio show host, bumper
stickers, atheist audio, infidels, mp3, mp3 downloads, atheist talk
shows, atheist talk show, freethinker radio, infidels, infidel, radio
interviews, rationalist, evolution, science, skeptic, live
interviews, religion, atheism, freethought, radio, broadcasts,
atheist flash, where was God?, 911, 9-11, atheist animation, atheist,
atlanta, evolution, free, mp3 audio, streaming, debate, debates,
theology, anti-religious, audio show, news, resources, directory,
black atheists, atheism, science, radio, live radio, Real audio, god,
shows, athiest, athiesm, religion chat, live shows, real audio, show,
webcast, agnostic, Reginald V. Finley, Jesus, best atheist site,
world religions, nation, god, hot guys, skepticism, atheist radio,
list of religions, atheistguy, atheist guy, agnostic blacks, atheist
models, infidelguy, freethought radio, theinfidelguy.com, no god,
religious myths, pagan, new, egyptian mythology, the naked truth,
satan, evidence for god, against God, work from home, is God real?,
new age, dios, ateist, infadel, ask god, ask jesus, guestbook, 10
commandments, roy moore, ashera, proof against God, god doesn't
exist, god is dead, remove, legal, law, truth,
jason gastrich interview,
mike ledo, robert price, acharya s, jordan maxwell, astrotheology,
bible criticism, word of God, kent hovind, movie, dan barker, amber,
finley, christ, chrestus, cristos, christos, truth about angels,
nicea, syllogisms, budda, buddha, satan, pagan, apatheist, foxhole,
112, unbeliever, christian audio debates, sermon audio, athiest,
infidels, syllogisms, streaming audio, atheist music, atheist forums,
mushinrunshya, mushinronsha, church signs, matrix, the bible,
mushinron, biblegal, infidelwife, wifeswap, atheist finley, amber
finley, atheist in Georgia, godless wife, atheistic radio show, wife
swap
So, the Infidel Guy isn't just hosting my debate with Barker. He
isn't just selling it. He's advertising for it and hoping search
engines pick his web page up, so people will pay him for a Gold
membership, then download it!
Is this kind of behavior typical among people like Reggie? Would any
atheist be bold enough to approach Reggie about his unethical
behavior? Somehow, I doubt it.
Reggie Finley is doing the same exact thing with my debate with Eddie
Tabash. He got a copy of it, put it on his web site, then began
charging people before they could hear it. Today, when I politely
asked him to stop, he ran to Eddie Tabash to ask him for permission.
Eddie said ok, but I told both of them that I'd prefer it if the
debate were a FREE download.
Now, you may think it's nice that he got permission from Eddie Tabash
to sell this debate. However, what in the world took him so long?
He has had this debate for months! Doesn't Finley have any
integrity? If he did, he would have asked before he started selling
it.
Finally, I've been very unimpressed with Finley's emails to me. Not
once did he apologize or concede that he was doing anything wrong. I
know he's an atheist, but I thought he had a clue about ethics.
Perhaps another atheist can set him straight. Perhaps not. If
someone does, here is his email address:
Regards,
Jason Gastrich
--
--------
Jesus Christ Saves Ministries
http://www.jcsm.org
Over 90,000 web pages!
John 8:36 reads, "Therefore if the Son makes you free, you shall be
free indeed."
Galatians 5:1 reads, "Stand fast therefore in the liberty by which
Christ has made us free, and do not be entangled again with a yoke of
bondage."
ICQ#: 20731140 . AIM: MrJasonGastrich . YIM: Jesus_Saved_Jason
.
|
|
|
| User: "BDK" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy) |
14 Mar 2005 02:48:25 AM |
|
|
In article <gcaZd.39663$VD5.28494@twister.socal.rr.com>, usenetspam1
@yahoo.com says...
I accidentally hit send before I typed the FREE link to my debates:
http://sa.jcsm.org
Jason Gastrich wrote:
Has anyone heard of Reggie Finley? He's also known as The Infidel
Guy. He has a web site and an internet radio program.
Reggie Finley hosts an assortment of mp3 files. He charges people
money to join for a "Gold plan" membership, then they can download
these files. Unfortunately, the Infidel Guy is unethical.
Reggie Finley is hosting a variety of my debates without permission.
If he were offering them for free, then I wouldn't have a problem
with him. However, Infidel Guy is actually charging people money
before they can download them! He's making a profit off my debates
with people like Eddie Tabash and Dan Barker.
See the following link. It's in his "Top Rated" section. Link:
http://infidelguy.com/modules.php?name=Downloads&d_op=TopRated
Without permission, Reggie Finley is charging people money before
they can hear my debate with Dan Barker. I'm offering this debate
for free on my web site. See here:
As you can see (or can't see), Finley even has keywords embedded into
his page with my name on them! If you "View Source" on that page
above, you can see these:
keywords: BIBLE, passion of the Christ critique, liberal, liberal
news, liberal radio network, logical arguments against God,
questioning God, premises, evolution, radio show host, bumper
stickers, atheist audio, infidels, mp3, mp3 downloads, atheist talk
shows, atheist talk show, freethinker radio, infidels, infidel, radio
interviews, rationalist, evolution, science, skeptic, live
interviews, religion, atheism, freethought, radio, broadcasts,
atheist flash, where was God?, 911, 9-11, atheist animation, atheist,
atlanta, evolution, free, mp3 audio, streaming, debate, debates,
theology, anti-religious, audio show, news, resources, directory,
black atheists, atheism, science, radio, live radio, Real audio, god,
shows, athiest, athiesm, religion chat, live shows, real audio, show,
webcast, agnostic, Reginald V. Finley, Jesus, best atheist site,
world religions, nation, god, hot guys, skepticism, atheist radio,
list of religions, atheistguy, atheist guy, agnostic blacks, atheist
models, infidelguy, freethought radio, theinfidelguy.com, no god,
religious myths, pagan, new, egyptian mythology, the naked truth,
satan, evidence for god, against God, work from home, is God real?,
new age, dios, ateist, infadel, ask god, ask jesus, guestbook, 10
commandments, roy moore, ashera, proof against God, god doesn't
exist, god is dead, remove, legal, law, truth,
jason gastrich interview,
mike ledo, robert price, acharya s, jordan maxwell, astrotheology,
bible criticism, word of God, kent hovind, movie, dan barker, amber,
finley, christ, chrestus, cristos, christos, truth about angels,
nicea, syllogisms, budda, buddha, satan, pagan, apatheist, foxhole,
112, unbeliever, christian audio debates, sermon audio, athiest,
infidels, syllogisms, streaming audio, atheist music, atheist forums,
mushinrunshya, mushinronsha, church signs, matrix, the bible,
mushinron, biblegal, infidelwife, wifeswap, atheist finley, amber
finley, atheist in Georgia, godless wife, atheistic radio show, wife
swap
So, the Infidel Guy isn't just hosting my debate with Barker. He
isn't just selling it. He's advertising for it and hoping search
engines pick his web page up, so people will pay him for a Gold
membership, then download it!
Is this kind of behavior typical among people like Reggie? Would any
atheist be bold enough to approach Reggie about his unethical
behavior? Somehow, I doubt it.
Reggie Finley is doing the same exact thing with my debate with Eddie
Tabash. He got a copy of it, put it on his web site, then began
charging people before they could hear it. Today, when I politely
asked him to stop, he ran to Eddie Tabash to ask him for permission.
Eddie said ok, but I told both of them that I'd prefer it if the
debate were a FREE download.
Now, you may think it's nice that he got permission from Eddie Tabash
to sell this debate. However, what in the world took him so long?
He has had this debate for months! Doesn't Finley have any
integrity? If he did, he would have asked before he started selling
it.
Finally, I've been very unimpressed with Finley's emails to me. Not
once did he apologize or concede that he was doing anything wrong. I
know he's an atheist, but I thought he had a clue about ethics.
Perhaps another atheist can set him straight. Perhaps not. If
someone does, here is his email address:
Regards,
Jason Gastrich
And your site is worth every bit of money it costs...
Oh, never mind...
BDK
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Don Kresch" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy) |
14 Mar 2005 07:13:27 AM |
|
|
In alt.atheism on Mon, 14 Mar 2005 06:03:51 GMT, "Jason Gastrich"
<usenetspam1@yahoo.com> let us all know that:
Has anyone heard of Reggie Finley?
Yes. He's the guy who was gonna sue your ***** off for infringing
on his domain name. Your infringement was quite unethical, and you
gave him back the domain name for $50 AFTER you said that you were
thinking of just giving it back to him anyway and AFTER he told you
that you were about to get sued.
He's also known as The Infidel Guy. He
has a web site and an internet radio program.
Reggie Finley hosts an assortment of mp3 files. He charges people money to
join for a "Gold plan" membership, then they can download these files.
Unfortunately, the Infidel Guy is unethical.
Reggie Finley is hosting a variety of my debates without permission.
No, he's not. They aren't copyrighted. Ergo....
Don
---
aa #51, Knight of BAAWA, DNRC o-, Member of the [H]orde
Atheist Minister for St. Dogbert.
"No being is so important that he can usurp the rights of another"
Picard to Data/Graves "The Schizoid Man"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy) |
14 Mar 2005 06:08:45 AM |
|
|
In our last episode <bP9Zd.39660$VD5.5611@twister.socal.rr.com>, Jason
Gastrich pirouetted gracefully and with great fanfare proclaimed:
Has anyone heard of Reggie Finley? He's also known as The Infidel Guy.
He has a web site and an internet radio program.
Reggie Finley hosts an assortment of mp3 files. He charges people money
to join for a "Gold plan" membership, then they can download these files.
Unfortunately, the Infidel Guy is unethical.
Why should anyone believe the account of a proven hypocrite like you?
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Group website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful."
-- Seneca the Younger
.
|
|
|
| User: "wcb" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy) |
14 Mar 2005 07:54:08 AM |
|
|
Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
In our last episode <bP9Zd.39660$VD5.5611@twister.socal.rr.com>, Jason
Gastrich pirouetted gracefully and with great fanfare proclaimed:
Has anyone heard of Reggie Finley? He's also known as The Infidel Guy.
He has a web site and an internet radio program.
Reggie Finley hosts an assortment of mp3 files. He charges people money
to join for a "Gold plan" membership, then they can download these files.
Unfortunately, the Infidel Guy is unethical.
Why should anyone believe the account of a proven hypocrite like you?
Shouldn't you send a bill to Gastrich for use of the list?
--
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy) |
14 Mar 2005 12:12:13 PM |
|
|
In our last episode <bP9Zd.39660$VD5.5611@twister.socal.rr.com>, Jason
Gastrich pirouetted gracefully and with great fanfare proclaimed:
Has anyone heard of Reggie Finley?
Yep. In fact, I just got this email from him (and, yes, have his
permission to post it and this is the entire, unedited email):
-------------------------
Feel Free to Distribute:
Here's Jason again with his tantrums. He's a harrasser too. I told him to
stop emailing me but he keeps doing it. As he alluded to, I have
permission already to host these files. I currently have 614 gold members
to my show archives. Gold Members subscribe to access my show archive. The
gastrich interviews are simply extras I throw my gold members. It's
basically free promotion for his ministry. No one is becoming a gold
member just to download his interviews. If he thinks so, he is so full of
himself. He's just trying to find something wrong with everyone else
because he's the one that keeps getting his ***** kicked in debate and he's
the one that acquired theinfidelguy.com unethically and I had to threaten
legal action before he agreed to my terms.
By the way, my family is going to be appearing on ABC's WifeSwap soon,
this could have been good promotion for his little ministry. I wouldn't
complain if a Cable network aired some of my shows. heh! Oh.. the keyword
thing? Jason Gastrich has appeared on MY SHOW! Jeebus H Chrispies! It's
perfectly fine for me to put that in my keywords.
Jason Gastrich hasn't mentioned that he has been posting quite a number of
MY shows over at: http://www.sermonaudio.com. I have never complained. I
realize that it's free promotion and it isn't that many. I have over 300
shows and audio segments I have done. What's 4 or 5 shows? <shrugs>
I hope he gets a new hobby. This is getting very old.
A new site design is coming out soon and there will be more freebies
available etc. Right now the system is structured and very hard to code
around. I just find it odd that he would complain when even the people
that he's had on the show say they don't mind. He's never happy.
Oh Jason, thanks. I just got 4 more gold memberships thanks to your
tantrums. Oh what's this? They are signing up to access my shows! Wow.. I
thought people were signing up just to listen to a few Gastrich
interviews. <Much sarcasm>
--
In reason,
Reggie & Amber Finley
The Infidel Guy Show
http://www.infidelguy.com
-----------------
Be on the lookout for The InfidelGuy and family on ABC's WifeSwap. Date
Unknown at this time.
---------------------
---------------------
You claim he doesn't have permission to offer the debate between Dan
Barker and yourself. Mind explaining how that works? What were the terms
agreed upon ahead of time? Was there even any agreement on "ownership"
of the debate? Or are you merely so desperate to make yourself look good
by attacking others that you're trying to make up "rules" after the fact?
In short, if *you can offer it for download, why can't Reggie? Explain
that.
And, no, he's not charging *for that debate. He's charging a fee for the
bandwidth and storage space resources. That debate is only one file out of
many. Running sites costs money.
Once again you seem to think that atheists are supposed to give things
away "for free" (particularly to *you) or we're "bad people." Sorry but
that's just incoherent. You're the one who has to adhere to the NT
injunctions of giving freely because you were freely given to. Not us.
Once again you seem "shocked" to discover atheists are not Christians.
Which is funny because we'll *tell you that.
Far as who can post what where, you're on shaky ground. There's that whole
incident where you registered domains next to Reggie's to try to divert
traffic and only when it became possible for him file suit against you did
you decide to become oh-so-generous and let him buy the domain from you.
You tried suing Bill Butler over the fair use of one of your graphics.
http://www.durangobill.com/JasonGastrich.html
http://www.durangobill.com/JG_DMCA_abuse.html
http://www.johncollins.org/JG/Jason_Gastrich.html
THEN you turned around and swiped the alt.atheism "number list" off of *my
site without permission *and after I'd blocked your IP (which was a pretty
clear statement I did not give you permission to be on my site don't you
think?). You republished the list--again sans permission--on your site.
http://jcsm.org/1on1/AltAtheismAtheistAgnosticList.htm
Then had the nerve to publicly attack Butler and myself for our allegedly
questionable morals.
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/free.christians/msg/723c20f18961c21f
You *also publicly posted my private email to you which is, in itself, a
likely violation of copyright. If anybody has "subjective morals," it's
Jason Gastrich. Your behavior shows that you believe *you can do anything
you want while *others cannot do anything you dislike. That appears to be
your *only "moral" standard. What *you want.
You also, in this post, appear to be attempting to conflate two wholly
different things. Your complaint about the keywords on Reggie's site is
utterly specious. You did an interview on his show. The keyword *says (and
you have this in your own damn post):
jason gastrich interview
Well, you *did do an interview. On *his show. Are you complaining about
Reggie posting and "advertising" one of his OWN shows on his site? That'd
be a ludicrous complaint.
Your comment:
"So, the Infidel Guy isn't just hosting my debate with Barker. He isn't
just selling it. He's advertising for it and hoping search engines pick
his web page up, so people will pay him for a Gold membership, then
download it!"
Is a deliberate dishonesty. You KNOW you did an interview on his show. You
even, yourself, offer the interview for download. And we can all clearly
see the keywords are advertising an *interview. As in the one you did for
HIS show.
You are *such a hypocrite.
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Group website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful."
-- Seneca the Younger
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ultra Maroon" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy) |
15 Mar 2005 09:07:34 AM |
|
|
Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
In our last episode <bP9Zd.39660$VD5.5611@twister.socal.rr.com>,
Jason
Gastrich pirouetted gracefully and with great fanfare proclaimed:
Has anyone heard of Reggie Finley?
<snip zoo>
If he thinks so, he is so full of himself. He's just trying
to find something wrong with everyone else because he's the
one that keeps getting his ***** kicked in debate and he's
the one that acquired theinfidelguy.com unethically and
I had to threaten legal action before he agreed to my terms.
But Gasbag told us:
"To Whom it May Concern,
On December 9, for the very first time, Reggie Finley contacted me and
asked me if he could purchase theinfidelguy.com for $55. I returned
his message with a phone call and agreed.
My desire to sell this domain to him at a reasonable price had nothing
to do with a potential lawsuit against me. In fact, Reggie lives in
Atlanta and I live in San Diego and I know that he has very limited
funds and that a lawsuit would be virtually impossible for him.
I sold this domain name to Reggie to show him and the atheist community
goodwill. I had been thinking about giving it to him for awhile and
when I received his call and his offer, I quickly accepted."
That's at
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/61840186d6b3cdbb?dmode=source
So who do we believe? Gasbag, who's lied to us over and over again?
Or Reggie, who has never lied to us? I know who gets my vote!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy) |
16 Mar 2005 07:13:18 AM |
|
|
In our last episode
<1110899254.132842.154150@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>, Ultra Maroon
pirouetted gracefully and with great fanfare proclaimed:
Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
In our last episode <bP9Zd.39660$VD5.5611@twister.socal.rr.com>,
Jason
Gastrich pirouetted gracefully and with great fanfare proclaimed:
Has anyone heard of Reggie Finley?
<snip zoo>
If he thinks so, he is so full of himself. He's just trying to find
something wrong with everyone else because he's the one that keeps
getting his ***** kicked in debate and he's the one that acquired
theinfidelguy.com unethically and I had to threaten legal action before
he agreed to my terms.
But Gasbag told us:
"To Whom it May Concern,
On December 9, for the very first time, Reggie Finley contacted me and
asked me if he could purchase theinfidelguy.com for $55. I returned his
message with a phone call and agreed.
My desire to sell this domain to him at a reasonable price had nothing to
do with a potential lawsuit against me. In fact, Reggie lives in Atlanta
and I live in San Diego and I know that he has very limited funds and that
a lawsuit would be virtually impossible for him.
I sold this domain name to Reggie to show him and the atheist community
goodwill. I had been thinking about giving it to him for awhile and when
I received his call and his offer, I quickly accepted."
That's at
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/61840186d6b3cdbb?dmode=source
So who do we believe? Gasbag, who's lied to us over and over again? Or
Reggie, who has never lied to us? I know who gets my vote!
And doncha love Gasbag's "I meant to do that!" excuse? Total frat boy that
one...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Group website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful."
-- Seneca the Younger
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ian Braidwood" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy) |
14 Mar 2005 01:50:06 AM |
|
|
Jason Gastrich wrote:
Has anyone heard of Reggie Finley? He's also known as The Infidel
Guy. He
has a web site and an internet radio program.
Reggie Finley hosts an assortment of mp3 files. He charges people
money to
join for a "Gold plan" membership, then they can download these
files.
Unfortunately, the Infidel Guy is unethical...
Perhaps you can answer me a question, Jason: What exactly is ethical
about character assaination?
While it's true that Reg charges for gold membership, he doesn't charge
for each individual download; so it's questionable to say that he's
charging people to listen to your debates, because the gold section
hosts far more material than just you. No one would pay just to listen
to you.
Of course, we know the real reason for this and that is that Reggie is
such an effective voice that Christians are trying to shut him down in
whatever way they can, even to the point of hacking into his system.
Now, you're trying to hit him in the wallet by offering atheists free
what Reg charges for. It won't work, because not only do we atheists
recognise that Reg is an ordinary person like us and doesn't have the
resources of a church behind hime, but he offers much more than just
you.
It seems you people have a distinct problem with free speech, except
when it allows people to listen to you, of course; you're all for that.
If you can't deal honestly with people, I suggest you shouldn't deal at
all.
(-: Ian :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Therion Ware" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy) |
14 Mar 2005 01:58:38 AM |
|
|
On 13 Mar 2005 23:50:06 -0800 in alt.atheism, Ian Braidwood ("Ian
Braidwood" <diri.gini@virgin.net>) said, directing the reply to
alt.atheism
Jason Gastrich wrote:
Has anyone heard of Reggie Finley? He's also known as The Infidel
Guy. He
has a web site and an internet radio program.
Reggie Finley hosts an assortment of mp3 files. He charges people
money to
join for a "Gold plan" membership, then they can download these
files.
Unfortunately, the Infidel Guy is unethical...
Perhaps you can answer me a question, Jason: What exactly is ethical
about character assaination?
While it's true that Reg charges for gold membership, he doesn't charge
for each individual download; so it's questionable to say that he's
charging people to listen to your debates, because the gold section
hosts far more material than just you. No one would pay just to listen
to you.
Of course, we know the real reason for this and that is that Reggie is
such an effective voice that Christians are trying to shut him down in
whatever way they can, even to the point of hacking into his system.
Now, you're trying to hit him in the wallet by offering atheists free
what Reg charges for. It won't work, because not only do we atheists
recognise that Reg is an ordinary person like us and doesn't have the
resources of a church behind hime, but he offers much more than just
you.
Point of order: neither does Jason.
It seems you people have a distinct problem with free speech, except
when it allows people to listen to you, of course; you're all for that.
If you can't deal honestly with people, I suggest you shouldn't deal at
all.
(-: Ian :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Sienkiewicz" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy) |
14 Mar 2005 02:12:08 AM |
|
|
Therion Ware wrote:
On 13 Mar 2005 23:50:06 -0800 in alt.atheism, Ian Braidwood ("Ian
Braidwood" <diri.gini@virgin.net>) said, directing the reply to
alt.atheism
Jason Gastrich wrote:
Has anyone heard of Reggie Finley? He's also known as The Infidel
Guy. He
has a web site and an internet radio program.
< snip >
Now, you're trying to hit him in the wallet by offering atheists
free
what Reg charges for. It won't work, because not only do we atheists
recognise that Reg is an ordinary person like us and doesn't have
the
resources of a church behind hime, but he offers much more than just
you.
Point of order: neither does Jason.
Correct. In fact, it does seem that Jason's antics aren't altogether
pleasing to even the conservative, evangelical churches that he
sometimes names.
It is also a good point, though, that the charge at Infidel Guy is for
a membership which includes the downloads as a perk, and that the
downloads are not limited to the debates in which Jason took part - far
from it. There seem to be quite a few recordings available.
I'm actually cynical enough to wonder if Jason's emails to Reggie
weren't demands for a share in the "profits," such as they might be,
and if that would be the case, we can guess why Jason would be put off
by any potential reply that Reggie might have given him.
< snip >
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Sienkiewicz" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy) |
14 Mar 2005 02:18:48 AM |
|
|
David Sienkiewicz wrote:
< snip >
Double-checking:
It is also a good point, though, that the charge at Infidel Guy is
for
a membership which includes the downloads as a perk, and that the
downloads are not limited to the debates in which Jason took part -
far
from it. There seem to be quite a few recordings available.
There appear to be 33 audio recordings available.
That includes the two about which Jason complains.
< snip >
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Sienkiewicz" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy) |
14 Mar 2005 02:20:39 AM |
|
|
David Sienkiewicz wrote:
David Sienkiewicz wrote:
< snip >
Double-checking:
It is also a good point, though, that the charge at Infidel Guy is
for
a membership which includes the downloads as a perk, and that the
downloads are not limited to the debates in which Jason took part -
far
from it. There seem to be quite a few recordings available.
There appear to be 33 audio recordings available.
That includes the two about which Jason complains.
< snip >
Whoops. Make it three.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy) |
14 Mar 2005 05:54:08 PM |
|
|
"Ian Braidwood" <diri.gini@virgin.net> wrote in message
news:1110786606.600401.30020@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Jason Gastrich wrote:
Has anyone heard of Reggie Finley? He's also known as The Infidel
Guy. He
has a web site and an internet radio program.
Reggie Finley hosts an assortment of mp3 files. He charges people
money to
join for a "Gold plan" membership, then they can download these
files.
Unfortunately, the Infidel Guy is unethical...
Perhaps you can answer me a question, Jason: What exactly is ethical
about character assaination?
Well, we already know that Jason is totally unethical. He's a thief, no
matter what his reasons. He stole a copy of the alt.atheism atheist/
agnostic list off the alt.atheism official website, in spite of being
asked and then told not to do this. When a block was put up to stop
him from doing this, he went in under a fake name and did it, anyway.
So, he's not just a thief; he's liar. Is this the kind of person you really
want to learn about religion from? This is my list of names that I have
collected over the past five years. I never gave Jason permission to
use it for his hypocritical religious purposes.
By the way, Jason, 13 people have now joined the list thanks
to you. And, one is a former Christian that you helped to
become an atheist. And, no, I'm not going to tell you who it is,
since you would probably hound that person. And, you won't
be able to figure out who it is by checking the highest numbers
on the list (when I get around to posting them), since I'm also
giving out old numbers that have been temporarily removed
from the list. And, I am going back and forth just as a
precaution to protect my list members from vipers like you.
While it's true that Reg charges for gold membership, he doesn't charge
for each individual download; so it's questionable to say that he's
charging people to listen to your debates, because the gold section
hosts far more material than just you. No one would pay just to listen
to you.
Of course, we know the real reason for this and that is that Reggie is
such an effective voice that Christians are trying to shut him down in
whatever way they can, even to the point of hacking into his system.
Now, you're trying to hit him in the wallet by offering atheists free
what Reg charges for. It won't work, because not only do we atheists
recognise that Reg is an ordinary person like us and doesn't have the
resources of a church behind hime, but he offers much more than just
you.
And, just Jason is very, very little.
It seems you people have a distinct problem with free speech, except
when it allows people to listen to you, of course; you're all for that.
If you can't deal honestly with people, I suggest you shouldn't deal at
all.
(-: Ian :-)
--
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
Michelle Malkin (Mickey) aa list#1
alt.atheism atheist/agnostic list name collector
BAAWA Knight & EAC Bible thumper thumper
http://questioner.www2.50megs.com
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jason Gastrich" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy) |
14 Mar 2005 02:15:26 AM |
|
|
Ian Braidwood wrote:
Jason Gastrich wrote:
Has anyone heard of Reggie Finley? He's also known as The Infidel
Guy. He has a web site and an internet radio program.
Reggie Finley hosts an assortment of mp3 files. He charges people
money to join for a "Gold plan" membership, then they can download
these files. Unfortunately, the Infidel Guy is unethical...
Perhaps you can answer me a question, Jason: What exactly is ethical
about character assaination?
While it's true that Reg charges for gold membership, he doesn't
charge for each individual download; so it's questionable to say that
he's charging people to listen to your debates, because the gold
section hosts far more material than just you. No one would pay just
to listen to you.
Of course, we know the real reason for this and that is that Reggie is
such an effective voice that Christians are trying to shut him down in
whatever way they can, even to the point of hacking into his system.
Wishful thinking.
Now, you're trying to hit him in the wallet by offering atheists free
what Reg charges for.
Huh? You act like I'm offering mine free after the fact. I've been
offering my debate free on my site since the debate took place. He's the
one who decided to try and profit from it.
It won't work, because not only do we atheists
recognise that Reg is an ordinary person like us and doesn't have the
resources of a church behind hime, but he offers much more than just
you.
It seems you people have a distinct problem with free speech, except
when it allows people to listen to you, of course; you're all for
that.
If you can't deal honestly with people, I suggest you shouldn't deal
at all.
(-: Ian :-)
Haha. Right.
You're so blinded by your anti-religious agenda that you can't see when an
atheist steals and profits from it.
I'm not against free speech. I've done numerous things to get my debate out
there and get it heard! I'm simply against Reggie charging money before one
can listen to my debates. This is unethical and wrong.
Regards,
Jason
--
--------
Jesus Christ Saves Ministries
http://www.jcsm.org
Over 90,000 web pages!
John 8:36 reads, "Therefore if the Son makes you free, you shall be
free indeed."
Galatians 5:1 reads, "Stand fast therefore in the liberty by which
Christ has made us free, and do not be entangled again with a yoke of
bondage."
ICQ#: 20731140 . AIM: MrJasonGastrich . YIM: Jesus_Saved_Jason
.
|
|
|
| User: "Therion Ware" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy) |
14 Mar 2005 03:42:13 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 08:15:26 GMT in free.christians, Jason Gastrich
("Jason Gastrich" <usenetspam1@yahoo.com>) said, directing the reply
to free.christians
Ian Braidwood wrote:
Jason Gastrich wrote:
Has anyone heard of Reggie Finley? He's also known as The Infidel
Guy. He has a web site and an internet radio program.
Reggie Finley hosts an assortment of mp3 files. He charges people
money to join for a "Gold plan" membership, then they can download
these files. Unfortunately, the Infidel Guy is unethical...
Perhaps you can answer me a question, Jason: What exactly is ethical
about character assaination?
While it's true that Reg charges for gold membership, he doesn't
charge for each individual download; so it's questionable to say that
he's charging people to listen to your debates, because the gold
section hosts far more material than just you. No one would pay just
to listen to you.
Of course, we know the real reason for this and that is that Reggie is
such an effective voice that Christians are trying to shut him down in
whatever way they can, even to the point of hacking into his system.
Wishful thinking.
Now, you're trying to hit him in the wallet by offering atheists free
what Reg charges for.
Huh? You act like I'm offering mine free after the fact. I've been
offering my debate free on my site since the debate took place. He's the
one who decided to try and profit from it.
It won't work, because not only do we atheists
recognise that Reg is an ordinary person like us and doesn't have the
resources of a church behind hime, but he offers much more than just
you.
It seems you people have a distinct problem with free speech, except
when it allows people to listen to you, of course; you're all for
that.
If you can't deal honestly with people, I suggest you shouldn't deal
at all.
(-: Ian :-)
Haha. Right.
You're so blinded by your anti-religious agenda that you can't see when an
atheist steals and profits from it.
"Steals"? Until we know who owns the rights to the audio tracks and
under what terms they were originally made available that's a rather
strong and potentially actionable allegation! Care to justify it?
I'm not against free speech. I've done numerous things to get my debate out
there and get it heard! I'm simply against Reggie charging money before one
can listen to my debates. This is unethical and wrong.
Why? Rights issues aside, you appear to be saying that if someone
makes something available free, it's unethical for someone else to
charge for it. If that is what you're saying, on what basis are you
saying it?
For instance, I have a few downloadable movies on my website, more as
proof of concept than anything else, "Reefer Madness," "Night of the
Living Dead," and "Duck and Cover".
http://www.video2cd.co.uk/sctrl/listallmovies1.asp
if you're interested. I think you'd like "Reefer Madness"...
These movies are available free from the Prelinger Archive. Because
they're obtainable free there is it unethical for me to charge for
them?
Which doesn't seem very "American Way" to me, or indeed a particularly
Republican position...
--
"Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You."
- Attrib: Pauline Reage.
Inexpensive VHS & other video to CD/DVD conversion?
See: www.Video2CD.com. 35.00 gets your video on DVD.
Market Your DVD to The World For Almost Nothing: www.instantdvd.tv
** atheist poster child #1 ** #442.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy) |
14 Mar 2005 06:10:19 AM |
|
|
In our last episode <e8ja319j4icrc834r996fku6mdou3gnooj@4ax.com>, Therion
Ware pirouetted gracefully and with great fanfare proclaimed:
"Steals"? Until we know who owns the rights to the audio tracks and under
what terms they were originally made available that's a rather strong and
potentially actionable allegation! Care to justify it?
Gastrich's version of "justifying" anything is simply whatever he wants is
"right."
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Group website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful."
-- Seneca the Younger
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "David Sienkiewicz" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy) |
14 Mar 2005 03:49:42 AM |
|
|
Therion Ware wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 08:15:26 GMT in free.christians, Jason Gastrich
("Jason Gastrich" <usenetspam1@yahoo.com>) said, directing the reply
to free.christians
< snip >
Why? Rights issues aside, you appear to be saying that if someone
makes something available free, it's unethical for someone else to
charge for it. If that is what you're saying, on what basis are you
saying it?
For instance, I have a few downloadable movies on my website, more
as
proof of concept than anything else, "Reefer Madness," "Night of the
Living Dead," and "Duck and Cover".
http://www.video2cd.co.uk/sctrl/listallmovies1.asp
if you're interested. I think you'd like "Reefer Madness"...
These movies are available free from the Prelinger Archive. Because
they're obtainable free there is it unethical for me to charge for
them?
Which doesn't seem very "American Way" to me, or indeed a
particularly
Republican position...
Part of free market economics has to do with services rendered. If you
want to charge for what would otherwise be free, elsewhere, the free
market will determine if you stay in business, but charging for items
that are otherwise free is not unethical.
After all, your servers aren't free to operate, I'm sure. You have to
recover your expenses in some way.
Perhaps your copies of the films are of better quality than those that
are offered for free. There are any number of possibilities.
Jason can't justify a charge of theft. The audio files have been
freely available for some time now, and Reggie doesn't charge
specifically for THEM, but for membership, which includes those files
as a perk.
Until and unless Jason can establish some direct violation of a
distribution agreement that was in place and agreed to prior to the
release of the audio files on the Internet, there's really nothing he
can complain about.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Therion Ware" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy) |
14 Mar 2005 06:35:12 AM |
|
|
On 14 Mar 2005 01:49:42 -0800 in alt.atheism, David Sienkiewicz
("David Sienkiewicz" <hdsienkiewicz@yahoo.com>) said, directing the
reply to alt.atheism
Therion Ware wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 08:15:26 GMT in free.christians, Jason Gastrich
("Jason Gastrich" <usenetspam1@yahoo.com>) said, directing the reply
to free.christians
< snip >
Why? Rights issues aside, you appear to be saying that if someone
makes something available free, it's unethical for someone else to
charge for it. If that is what you're saying, on what basis are you
saying it?
For instance, I have a few downloadable movies on my website, more
as
proof of concept than anything else, "Reefer Madness," "Night of the
Living Dead," and "Duck and Cover".
http://www.video2cd.co.uk/sctrl/listallmovies1.asp
if you're interested. I think you'd like "Reefer Madness"...
These movies are available free from the Prelinger Archive. Because
they're obtainable free there is it unethical for me to charge for
them?
Which doesn't seem very "American Way" to me, or indeed a particularly
Republican position...
Part of free market economics has to do with services rendered.
"So they tell me!"
If you
want to charge for what would otherwise be free, elsewhere, the free
market will determine if you stay in business, but charging for items
that are otherwise free is not unethical.
Well, I don't think so. After all, no one is holding a gun to your
head and making you buy what you could otherwise get for nothing: some
doctors in the USA make free treatment available. Is it then unethical
for other doctors to charge for their services?
After all, your servers aren't free to operate, I'm sure. You have to
recover your expenses in some way.
Indeed.
Perhaps your copies of the films are of better quality than those that
are offered for free. There are any number of possibilities.
Certainly, but really these movies are only a proof of concept. Their
quality is *crap* (except for "Duck and Cover," which is a real laugh)
in the original free versions, and while I've cleaned them up a bit,
they're never going to be brilliant unless I get access to the
original source.
The main problem with a "proof of concept" in this sense is getting
access to the rights to use a proper film as the demo.... <mutter>.
Speaking of which I'll be dropping you an email in a minute, seeking
to pick your brains....!
Jason can't justify a charge of theft.
No, in my opinion, based on what I've seen in this thread so far, and
a quick look around the net, he can't. And your earlier post which
gave your view of his underlying motivations for making an issue of
this, is in my view, as close to the truth as to make no difference.
He's primarily concerned with loss of revenue and a bit ***** (UK
sense) that someone can make money even if he offers the same thing
free, and worst of all, is by proxy attempting to set a context for
justifying his own deeply unethical behaviour by reference to the time
honoured:
"But Mommy, Tommy did it first" Justification.
"Argumentum ad Spoilt Child," perhaps?
Ah no:
"Argumentum ad puerum corruptum".
The audio files have been
freely available for some time now, and Reggie doesn't charge
specifically for THEM, but for membership, which includes those files
as a perk.
Well, if no rights issue attach, he's talking bollocks, which while
not unusual - well one has to wonder if this is yet another attempt to
improve his hit count, amongst the above.
Until and unless Jason can establish some direct violation of a
distribution agreement that was in place and agreed to prior to the
release of the audio files on the Internet, there's really nothing he
can complain about.
But plenty he *will* complain about given that in so far as I can
remember he's never let the facts of the matter stand between him and
a few more hits.
But you're right. The question of "bad ethics" hangs on the rights to
distribute the audio files. If Infidel Guy has broken any agreement
with respect to that then there is a problem.
<snigger>
But again, he's going to shoot himself in the foot.
--
"Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You."
- Attrib: Pauline Reage.
Inexpensive VHS & other video to CD/DVD conversion?
See: www.Video2CD.com. 35.00 gets your video on DVD.
Market Your DVD to The World For Almost Nothing: www.instantdvd.tv
** atheist poster child #1 ** #442.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy) |
14 Mar 2005 12:22:42 PM |
|
|
Therion Ware wrote:
Certainly, but really these movies are only a proof of concept. Their
quality is *crap* (except for "Duck and Cover," which is a real
laugh)
(OT a bit...)
We laugh now, but a cursory examination of the casualty
type breakdowns from Hiroshima and Nagasaki clearly shows
that "Duck and Cover", for its time, was a perfectly
sensible idea. Sure, it won't help if you're near the
fireball, but most of the injuries at both sites were
caused by *flying debris*. If I had a choice between
surviving a nuclear attack with a hunk of rebar stuck
through my chest and surviving a nuclear attack without,
I know which one I'd choose.
Walt Smith
Firelock on DALNet
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy) |
15 Mar 2005 05:19:53 PM |
|
|
"Jason Gastrich" <usenetspam1@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:yKbZd.39672$VD5.20850@twister.socal.rr.com...
snip
You're so blinded by your anti-religious agenda that you can't see when an
atheist steals and profits from it.
I see, it's only okay when you steal. Gotcha. What a hypocrite you are.
--
---------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Les Hellawell" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy) |
16 Mar 2005 05:25:59 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:19:53 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
"Jason Gastrich" <usenetspam1@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:yKbZd.39672$VD5.20850@twister.socal.rr.com...
snip
You're so blinded by your anti-religious agenda that you can't see when an
atheist steals and profits from it.
I see, it's only okay when you steal. Gotcha. What a hypocrite you are.
It's an old Christian principle, "Do as I say not what I do". They are
the self-appointed arbiters of the morality of others. I guess those
already in the know will be able to find something to that effect
in that nefarious collection of miscellany sometimes known as the
Bible.
--
Les Hellawell
greetings from
YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "George Peatty" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy) |
15 Mar 2005 08:07:55 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:19:53 -0500, "Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com>
wrote:
I see, it's only okay when you steal. Gotcha. What a hypocrite you are.
He's shown himself to be more moral than you. Your lies, distortions,
obfuscation and slurs are evident to all who will see ..
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy) |
15 Mar 2005 08:48:33 PM |
|
|
"George Peatty" <pttyg47-1230@copper.net> wrote in message
news:i55f31t6marnoidjbkftpbuqqkk4vhngc8@4ax.com...
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:19:53 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com>
wrote:
I see, it's only okay when you steal. Gotcha. What a hypocrite you are.
He's shown himself to be more moral than you. Your lies, distortions,
obfuscation and slurs are evident to all who will see ..
George, in lying this way, you have proven again that you
are just as evil as Jason. You have no credibility in alt.atheism
at all. You serve no purpose and are a total waste of time.
And, you can add to that that you are a sycophant and toadie.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Don Kresch" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy) |
15 Mar 2005 09:32:49 PM |
|
|
In alt.atheism on Tue, 15 Mar 2005 21:07:55 -0500, George Peatty
<pttyg47-1230@copper.net> let us all know that:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:19:53 -0500, "Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com>
wrote:
I see, it's only okay when you steal. Gotcha. What a hypocrite you are.
He's shown himself to be more moral than you.
No. All Gastrich does is lie, distort, inveigle, obfuscate,
insult, and whine.
Don
---
aa #51, Knight of BAAWA, DNRC o-, Member of the [H]orde
Atheist Minister for St. Dogbert.
"No being is so important that he can usurp the rights of another"
Picard to Data/Graves "The Schizoid Man"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Another Unethical Unbeliever: Reggie Finley (The Infidel Guy) |
15 Mar 2005 09:43:02 PM |
|
|
"Don Kresch" <ROT13.qxerfpu@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote in message
news:36af311tqn2fa7t6s1egakk5i88cti08u7@4ax.com...
In alt.atheism on Tue, 15 Mar 2005 21:07:55 -0500, George Peatty
<pttyg47-1230@copper.net> let us all know that:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:19:53 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com>
wrote:
I see, it's only okay when you steal. Gotcha. What a hypocrite you are.
He's shown himself to be more moral than you.
No. All Gastrich does is lie, distort, inveigle, obfuscate,
insult, and whine.
Indeed. And also, unlike Jason, I don't steal things off of other peoples'
websites, nor do I start frivolous lawsuits and lie about the amount of
money I was demanding.
--
---------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|