| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Bill Baker" |
| Date: |
07 Apr 2005 05:55:06 AM |
| Object: |
Anti-gay bigots in the minority in NY |
Majority In NYS Support Gay Marriage
http://www.365gay.com/newscon05/04/040605nyPoll.htm
(New York City) Support in the state of New York for marriage for
same-sex couples increased over the past year according to a new poll.
The Global Strategy Group survey found that 51% of New Yorkers support
marriage for same-sex couples while 42% do not. A similar Global
Strategy Group poll conducted for the Pride Agenda last year in March
2004 found 47% in support of marriage and 46% opposed. Both surveys
were taken by Global for Empire State Pride Agenda, the state's LGBT
civil rights organization.
The new poll also showed that New Yorkers overwhelmingly believe that
same-sex couples should have the same rights and protections government
currently grants opposite-sex couples through marriage.
Favorable response rates on questions about specific rights ranged from
72% in support of providing child custody rights to 83% in favor of
providing legal authority to make decisions about a deceased partner's
burial. Seventy-two percent (72%) of New Yorkers also favored civil
unions and domestic partner arrangements as avenues to provide legal
rights to same-sex couples.
"These findings confirm that New Yorkers are fair people who understand
that equality applies to everyone. This is good news for same-sex
couples and their families," said Empire State Pride Agenda Executive
Director Alan Van Capelle.
"The other good news in this year's poll numbers is that the national
attack campaign being conducted against our families by the
conservative and religious right does not appear to be fooling anyone
here in New York. Despite a year of persistent nation-wide attack, New
Yorkers are not retreating from their support for our families."
Van Capelle attributed much of the growing to support to a growing
visibility of same-sex couples. New Yorkers have traveled to
Massachusetts to marry and hundreds more to Canada.
"New Yorkers are seeing firsthand that life does not change when
same-sex couples are allowed to marry," Van Capelle said.
"The only lives that are changed are those of same-sex couples who got
married and now have more of the rights and protections they need to
take care of their families. The doomsday scenarios about same-sex
marriage being spun by the conservative and religious right are simply
not true and New Yorkers are not falling for them."
On poll questions about various rights and protections that government
gives to those who marry and whether same-sex couples should have
access to them, Van Capelle said, "The poll clearly shows there is
overwhelming support for our families having access to these rights and
protections. When 72% to 83% of New Yorkers give a resounding "Yes" to
our families having child custody rights, medical decision-making
authority, burial authority, health, pension and inheritance rights,
there is no longer anything left to debate in New York. Family equality
is a non-partisan issue and it is time for elected officials in Albany
to hear what their constituents are saying and take action so that our
families can have the same rights and protections others have."
On the overarching question of marriage for same-sex couples, Van
Capelle said, "New York continues to move in the right direction on
marriage. The increase in support this year over last year for the
right of same-sex couples to marry tells us that New Yorkers are
listening and thinking about this issue and are recognizing more and
more that access to marriage is about equality and protections for real
families."
.
|
|
| User: "kathryn" |
|
| Title: Re: Saying "No" to sin |
10 Apr 2005 08:39:55 AM |
|
|
"Choose God!" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:aeSdnXPxgNrHu8TfRVn-tg@comcast.com...
"kathryn" <bob@bobbybobbobthebobster.com> wrote
Whats wrong with national healthcare?
What's wrong with socialized medicine? What's wrong
with socialism?
You're kidding, right?
What's next, are you going to tell me that you support
Social(ism) Security, like all the other godless
liberals?
Please.
I work in social security - I think Id better believe in it
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Enkidu" |
|
| Title: Re: Saying "No" to sin |
10 Apr 2005 08:35:47 AM |
|
|
"Choose God!" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in news:aeSdnXPxgNrHu8TfRVn-
tg@comcast.com:
"kathryn" <bob@bobbybobbobthebobster.com> wrote
Whats wrong with national healthcare?
What's wrong with socialized medicine? What's wrong
with socialism?
You're kidding, right?
What's next, are you going to tell me that you support
Social(ism) Security, like all the other godless
liberals?
Please.
I like socialized fire protection. We all pay, and we're all entitled to
service when there's a fire. Socialized police protection seems to be
the norm as well. Roads? Socilism. Or perhaps you'd expect us all to
maintain our own infrastructure?
--
Enkidu AA#2165
EAC Chaplin and ordained minister,
ULC, Modesto, CA
"the trouble with theocracy is that everyone wants to be Theo."
--James Dunn
.
|
|
|
| User: "Peacenik" |
|
| Title: Re: Saying "No" to sin |
10 Apr 2005 08:21:22 PM |
|
|
"Enkidu" <zwi6iv402@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9634432215AD1255229@130.133.1.4...
"Choose God!" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in news:aeSdnXPxgNrHu8TfRVn-
tg@comcast.com:
"kathryn" <bob@bobbybobbobthebobster.com> wrote
Whats wrong with national healthcare?
What's wrong with socialized medicine? What's wrong
with socialism?
You're kidding, right?
What's next, are you going to tell me that you support
Social(ism) Security, like all the other godless
liberals?
Please.
I like socialized fire protection. We all pay, and we're all entitled to
service when there's a fire. Socialized police protection seems to be
the norm as well. Roads? Socilism. Or perhaps you'd expect us all to
maintain our own infrastructure?
And don't forget libraries, schools, and (if the Republican "faith-based
initiative" program is fully implements) churches.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Saying "No" to sin |
10 Apr 2005 10:41:49 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 09:21:27 -0400, "Choose God!"
<gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:
"kathryn" <bob@bobbybobbobthebobster.com> wrote
Whats wrong with national healthcare?
What's wrong with socialized medicine? What's wrong
with socialism?
Go ahead, I'm keen to hear it...
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Masked Avenger" |
|
| Title: Re: Saying "No" to sin |
11 Apr 2005 05:06:10 AM |
|
|
Choose God! wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote
When next you are tempted into sin, just don't do it.
You do not need God to sit on your shoulder and
tell you not to stick a red-hot poker into your
friend's eyes. If you need God to tell you that,
you're beyond redemption at this point.
Sinner! Abortionist! Supporter of national healthcare!
DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE!
DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE!
a VERY Christian response ....... BTW, where I live, we have National
Health care ......and it works ...... everybody is equal before the
doctor .... just like education, Fire Dept. etc .... it has its good
points ..... you neocons just love throwing the baby out with the
bathwater .......
--
Masked Avenger
aa#2224
EAC Chief Technician in charge of remotely rigging Fundie 'Spell
Checkers' so they all look like hick home schooled yokels
Does Schroedinger's cat have 18 half lives ?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Saying "No" to sin |
10 Apr 2005 03:32:39 PM |
|
|
Choose God! wrote:
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote
When next you are tempted into sin, just don't do it.
You do not need God to sit on your shoulder and
tell you not to stick a red-hot poker into your
friend's eyes. If you need God to tell you that,
you're beyond redemption at this point.
Sinner! Abortionist! Supporter of national healthcare!
You forgot "Liberal", "Commie", "Pig Dog", and "Heathen". Try to keep
with the times. ;-)
DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE!
DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE!
I will... in 50-70 years. 8-)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mephisto" |
|
| Title: Re: Saying "No" to sin |
10 Apr 2005 09:44:30 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 02:32:50 -0700, DanielSan
<daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote:
Choose God! wrote:
When next you are tempted into sin, choose God
instead:
http://www.sexinchrist.com/index.html
When next you are tempted into sin, just don't do it.
No! Next time you are tempted to sin, GO FOR IT! Life is short and
there's nothing after it, so you may as well extract as much enjoyment
from each day as you can - and as we all know, sin is FUN! It saddens
me to see so many people wasting the one chance they have at life
making themselves (and anyone unfortunate enough to have to listen to
them) miserable with ridiculous rules about what they should and
should not be allowed to do. There are laws to decide that for us, and
even those are too strict when it comes to a good old sin-fest.
Quite apart from all of the logical arguments against it, all that
Jesus and God crap is just plain boring. Don't do this, don't do that
- it's all just a mechanism for controlling stupid people... and the
great Oscar Wilde once said, the only real sin is stupidity.
Mephisto
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Saying "No" to sin |
10 Apr 2005 08:26:22 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 02:32:50 -0700, DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote:
Choose God! wrote:
When next you are tempted into sin, choose God
instead:
http://www.sexinchrist.com/index.html
When next you are tempted into sin, just don't do it. You do not need
God to sit on your shoulder and tell you not to stick a red-hot poker
into your friend's eyes. If you need God to tell you that, you're
beyond redemption at this point.
Yet the only reason you yourself don't do it is because of a positive response
by you to God's goodness coming to light in you.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: Saying "No" to sin |
11 Apr 2005 01:04:43 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 08:26:22 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 02:32:50 -0700, DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote:
Choose God! wrote:
When next you are tempted into sin, choose God
instead:
http://www.sexinchrist.com/index.html
When next you are tempted into sin, just don't do it. You do not need
God to sit on your shoulder and tell you not to stick a red-hot poker
into your friend's eyes. If you need God to tell you that, you're
beyond redemption at this point.
Yet the only reason you yourself don't do it is because of a positive response
by you to God's goodness coming to light in you.
Oh I see, the fact that you're a 62-year-old biological failure who
couldn't get laid in a Waikiki whorehouse is not because you're a
complete loser but because "god" wants it that way.
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1546 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
|
| User: "AngryJohn" |
|
| Title: Re: Saying "No" to sin |
11 Apr 2005 11:35:05 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 23:04:43 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's
Cocaine Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 08:26:22 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 02:32:50 -0700, DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote:
Choose God! wrote:
When next you are tempted into sin, choose God
instead:
http://www.sexinchrist.com/index.html
When next you are tempted into sin, just don't do it. You do not need
God to sit on your shoulder and tell you not to stick a red-hot poker
into your friend's eyes. If you need God to tell you that, you're
beyond redemption at this point.
Yet the only reason you yourself don't do it is because of a positive response
by you to God's goodness coming to light in you.
Oh I see, the fact that you're a 62-year-old biological failure who
couldn't get laid in a Waikiki whorehouse is not because you're a
complete loser but because "god" wants it that way.
-----
If "god" doesn't want earl to re-produce.............
------------------------------
aa#2106
Remove Belief to reply
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Saying "No" to sin |
16 Apr 2005 01:53:59 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 05:28:31 -0400,
"Choose God!" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:
When next you are tempted into sin...
LOL!!!! Another moronic SPAMMING troll.
<flussshhhh!>
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Saying "No" to sin |
10 Apr 2005 12:08:28 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 05:28:31 -0400, "Choose God!"
<gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:
When next you are tempted into sin, choose God
instead:
The next time you are tempted to post drivel to alt.atheism,
masturbate instead.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Brian Henderson" |
|
| Title: Re: Saying "No" to sin |
10 Apr 2005 03:54:06 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 05:28:31 -0400, "Choose God!"
<gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:
When next you are tempted into sin, choose God
instead:
Why would I want to choose a delusional father figure? I prefer
reality. Go away.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fritz" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-gay bigots in the minority in NY |
07 Apr 2005 11:45:21 AM |
|
|
Sir Marksman wrote:
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3ZOdnYseDZhjr8jfRVn-3w@comcast.com...
<anti@sodom.com> wrote
So what? Lot and the other righteous were
in the minority in Sodom.
Sodom, huh? Don't tell me, that was the city which
was "exactly where the bible said it would be," yet
to took over 100 years to find.
That's it, right?
There was no Sodom.
Archaeologists prove you wrong.
They didn't prove the story true.
I am glad to educate you again.
I am glad to educate you again.
-- Fritz ...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sir Marksman" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-gay bigots in the minority in NY |
07 Apr 2005 04:05:48 PM |
|
|
"Fritz" <fssafarth@b1aibltauwhcpl.neet> wrote in message
news:425563A1.69058FA0@b1aibltauwhcpl.neet...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3ZOdnYseDZhjr8jfRVn-3w@comcast.com...
<anti@sodom.com> wrote
So what? Lot and the other righteous were
in the minority in Sodom.
Sodom, huh? Don't tell me, that was the city which
was "exactly where the bible said it would be," yet
to took over 100 years to find.
That's it, right?
There was no Sodom.
Archaeologists prove you wrong.
They didn't prove the story true.
Your proof?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fritz" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-gay bigots in the minority in NY |
09 Apr 2005 01:46:02 AM |
|
|
Sir Marksman wrote:
Sodom, huh? Don't tell me, that was the city which
was "exactly where the bible said it would be," yet
to took over 100 years to find.
That's it, right?
There was no Sodom.
Archaeologists prove you wrong.
They didn't prove the story true.
Your proof?
Why?
-- Fritz ...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sir Marksman" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-gay bigots in the minority in NY |
09 Apr 2005 06:51:23 AM |
|
|
"Fritz" <fssafarth@b1aibltauwhcpl.neet> wrote in message
news:42577A2A.C9995297@b1aibltauwhcpl.neet...
Sir Marksman wrote:
Sodom, huh? Don't tell me, that was the city which
was "exactly where the bible said it would be," yet
to took over 100 years to find.
That's it, right?
There was no Sodom.
Archaeologists prove you wrong.
They didn't prove the story true.
Your proof?
Why?
Who cares?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rev. Karl E. Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-gay bigots in the minority in NY |
07 Apr 2005 09:39:38 AM |
|
|
Sir Marksman wrote:
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3ZOdnYseDZhjr8jfRVn-3w@comcast.com...
<anti@sodom.com> wrote
So what? Lot and the other righteous were
in the minority in Sodom.
Sodom, huh? Don't tell me, that was the city which
was "exactly where the bible said it would be," yet
to took over 100 years to find.
That's it, right?
There was no Sodom.
Archaeologists prove you wrong.
I am glad to educate you again.
Really, which archaeologists would that be?
Please provide a cite for this wonderful discovery. Since the
archaeologists in Israel seem to be having a hard time finding this
place. Maybe we can help them out.
--
There are none more ignorant and useless,
than they that seek answers on their knees,
with their eyes closed.
____________________________________________________________________
Rev. Karl E. Taylor
A.A #1143 PLONKED by Bob
Apostle of Dr. Lao EAC: Virgin Conversion Unit Director
____________________________________________________________________
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-gay bigots in the minority in NY |
07 Apr 2005 08:22:40 PM |
|
|
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@qwest.net> wrote
Archaeologists prove you wrong.
I am glad to educate you again.
Really, which archaeologists would that be?
None.
He's comfusing "archaeologists" with "biblical archaeologists."
There is a *Huge* difference.
In the case of the former it would be inaccurate (to say the
least) to insert "biblical" before the word "archaeologists."
You would be misrepresenting them, intentionally
miscommunicating.
In the case of the latter, you would be equally as dishonest
if you left of the "biblical," as the closeted homosexual
has done.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sir Marksman" |
|
| Title: Re: gay bigots in the majority in NY |
07 Apr 2005 09:20:45 PM |
|
|
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:FKadnUN3k755R8jfRVn-vQ@comcast.com...
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@qwest.net> wrote
Archaeologists prove you wrong.
I am glad to educate you again.
Really, which archaeologists would that be?
None.
Wrong again LIEberal scumbag!
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: gay bigots in the majority in NY |
07 Apr 2005 09:32:39 PM |
|
|
Sir Marksman wrote:
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:FKadnUN3k755R8jfRVn-vQ@comcast.com...
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@qwest.net> wrote
Archaeologists prove you wrong.
I am glad to educate you again.
Really, which archaeologists would that be?
None.
Wrong again LIEberal scumbag!
So, instead of answering the question, you resort to ad hominem. *Yawn*
This is tiring, Sir.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sir Marksman" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-gay bigots in the minority in NY |
07 Apr 2005 09:41:20 AM |
|
|
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:PAb5e.12$cu2.491@news.uswest.net...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3ZOdnYseDZhjr8jfRVn-3w@comcast.com...
<anti@sodom.com> wrote
So what? Lot and the other righteous were
in the minority in Sodom.
Sodom, huh? Don't tell me, that was the city which
was "exactly where the bible said it would be," yet
to took over 100 years to find.
That's it, right?
There was no Sodom.
Archaeologists prove you wrong.
I am glad to educate you again.
Really, which archaeologists would that be?
Please provide a cite for this wonderful discovery. Since the
archaeologists in Israel seem to be having a hard time finding this place.
Maybe we can help them out.
I am sorry that you are so ignorant and cannot do your own research. If
you'd like me to do it for you, I charge $50.00 an hour.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rev. Karl E. Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-gay bigots in the minority in NY |
07 Apr 2005 09:45:42 AM |
|
|
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:PAb5e.12$cu2.491@news.uswest.net...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3ZOdnYseDZhjr8jfRVn-3w@comcast.com...
<anti@sodom.com> wrote
So what? Lot and the other righteous were
in the minority in Sodom.
Sodom, huh? Don't tell me, that was the city which
was "exactly where the bible said it would be," yet
to took over 100 years to find.
That's it, right?
There was no Sodom.
Archaeologists prove you wrong.
I am glad to educate you again.
Really, which archaeologists would that be?
Please provide a cite for this wonderful discovery. Since the
archaeologists in Israel seem to be having a hard time finding this place.
Maybe we can help them out.
I am sorry that you are so ignorant and cannot do your own research. If
you'd like me to do it for you, I charge $50.00 an hour.
I have, you lie, thought so.
Like I said, the folks in Israel are having a hard time finding this
site. And since my research, is based on the work done by the
archaeologists in Israel, you have claimed something they can not find.
Now, do you have a cite? Or are you lying to cover your whopper of a lie?
--
There are none more ignorant and useless,
than they that seek answers on their knees,
with their eyes closed.
____________________________________________________________________
Rev. Karl E. Taylor
A.A #1143 PLONKED by Bob
Apostle of Dr. Lao EAC: Virgin Conversion Unit Director
____________________________________________________________________
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sir Marksman" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-gay bigots in the minority in NY |
07 Apr 2005 09:48:03 AM |
|
|
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:wGb5e.14$cu2.322@news.uswest.net...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:PAb5e.12$cu2.491@news.uswest.net...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3ZOdnYseDZhjr8jfRVn-3w@comcast.com...
<anti@sodom.com> wrote
So what? Lot and the other righteous were
in the minority in Sodom.
Sodom, huh? Don't tell me, that was the city which
was "exactly where the bible said it would be," yet
to took over 100 years to find.
That's it, right?
There was no Sodom.
Archaeologists prove you wrong.
I am glad to educate you again.
Really, which archaeologists would that be?
Please provide a cite for this wonderful discovery. Since the
archaeologists in Israel seem to be having a hard time finding this
place. Maybe we can help them out.
I am sorry that you are so ignorant and cannot do your own research. If
you'd like me to do it for you, I charge $50.00 an hour.
I have, you lie, thought so.
Please provide your PROOF that I lied. If you cannot provide any, you admit
that it is you who is the LIAR.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rev. Karl E. Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-gay bigots in the minority in NY |
07 Apr 2005 10:03:11 AM |
|
|
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:wGb5e.14$cu2.322@news.uswest.net...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:PAb5e.12$cu2.491@news.uswest.net...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3ZOdnYseDZhjr8jfRVn-3w@comcast.com...
<anti@sodom.com> wrote
So what? Lot and the other righteous were
in the minority in Sodom.
Sodom, huh? Don't tell me, that was the city which
was "exactly where the bible said it would be," yet
to took over 100 years to find.
That's it, right?
There was no Sodom.
Archaeologists prove you wrong.
I am glad to educate you again.
Really, which archaeologists would that be?
Please provide a cite for this wonderful discovery. Since the
archaeologists in Israel seem to be having a hard time finding this
place. Maybe we can help them out.
I am sorry that you are so ignorant and cannot do your own research. If
you'd like me to do it for you, I charge $50.00 an hour.
I have, you lie, thought so.
Please provide your PROOF that I lied. If you cannot provide any, you admit
that it is you who is the LIAR.
You said:
"Archaeologists prove you wrong."
I asked:
"Please provide a cite for this wonderful discovery. Since the
archaeologists in Israel seem to be having a hard time finding this
place. Maybe we can help them out."
You said:
"I am sorry that you are so ignorant and cannot do your own research"
Which is a lie. I have done my own research, it does not jive with what
you claim. I ask for clarification and a reference to your claim, to
further my own research.
You respond as a moronic child. You have no evidence to support your
claim. You made a false claim, and now refuse to back it up with a
citation of your evidence.
I have pointed out your lie.
Now, do you have a cite to support your claim, or do you admit that you
were lying yet again?
--
There are none more ignorant and useless,
than they that seek answers on their knees,
with their eyes closed.
____________________________________________________________________
Rev. Karl E. Taylor
A.A #1143 PLONKED by Bob
Apostle of Dr. Lao EAC: Virgin Conversion Unit Director
____________________________________________________________________
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sir Marksman" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-gay bigots in the minority in NY |
07 Apr 2005 10:02:33 AM |
|
|
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:XWb5e.30$zD3.47@news.uswest.net...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:wGb5e.14$cu2.322@news.uswest.net...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:PAb5e.12$cu2.491@news.uswest.net...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3ZOdnYseDZhjr8jfRVn-3w@comcast.com...
<anti@sodom.com> wrote
So what? Lot and the other righteous were
in the minority in Sodom.
Sodom, huh? Don't tell me, that was the city which
was "exactly where the bible said it would be," yet
to took over 100 years to find.
That's it, right?
There was no Sodom.
Archaeologists prove you wrong.
I am glad to educate you again.
Really, which archaeologists would that be?
Please provide a cite for this wonderful discovery. Since the
archaeologists in Israel seem to be having a hard time finding this
place. Maybe we can help them out.
I am sorry that you are so ignorant and cannot do your own research. If
you'd like me to do it for you, I charge $50.00 an hour.
I have, you lie, thought so.
Please provide your PROOF that I lied. If you cannot provide any, you
admit that it is you who is the LIAR.
You said:
"Archaeologists prove you wrong."
I asked:
"Please provide a cite for this wonderful discovery. Since the
archaeologists in Israel seem to be having a hard time finding this
place. Maybe we can help them out."
You said:
"I am sorry that you are so ignorant and cannot do your own research"
Which is a lie.
So you have no proof I lied. Therefore you admit you are a LIAR.
Thanks again!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rev. Karl E. Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-gay bigots in the minority in NY |
07 Apr 2005 10:09:41 AM |
|
|
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:XWb5e.30$zD3.47@news.uswest.net...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:wGb5e.14$cu2.322@news.uswest.net...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:PAb5e.12$cu2.491@news.uswest.net...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3ZOdnYseDZhjr8jfRVn-3w@comcast.com...
<anti@sodom.com> wrote
So what? Lot and the other righteous were
in the minority in Sodom.
Sodom, huh? Don't tell me, that was the city which
was "exactly where the bible said it would be," yet
to took over 100 years to find.
That's it, right?
There was no Sodom.
Archaeologists prove you wrong.
I am glad to educate you again.
Really, which archaeologists would that be?
Please provide a cite for this wonderful discovery. Since the
archaeologists in Israel seem to be having a hard time finding this
place. Maybe we can help them out.
I am sorry that you are so ignorant and cannot do your own research. If
you'd like me to do it for you, I charge $50.00 an hour.
I have, you lie, thought so.
Please provide your PROOF that I lied. If you cannot provide any, you
admit that it is you who is the LIAR.
You said:
"Archaeologists prove you wrong."
I asked:
"Please provide a cite for this wonderful discovery. Since the
archaeologists in Israel seem to be having a hard time finding this
place. Maybe we can help them out."
You said:
"I am sorry that you are so ignorant and cannot do your own research"
Which is a lie.
So you have no proof I lied. Therefore you admit you are a LIAR.
Thanks again!
And you have no evidence to support your claim.
Thanks for admitting you are a liar.
I also notice, that you cut out my proof of your lie. Funny how that
works out. You can't support your own claim, and you cut out evidence
that damns you for the liar you are.
Wow, what would Jesus do.
--
There are none more ignorant and useless,
than they that seek answers on their knees,
with their eyes closed.
____________________________________________________________________
Rev. Karl E. Taylor
A.A #1143 PLONKED by Bob
Apostle of Dr. Lao EAC: Virgin Conversion Unit Director
____________________________________________________________________
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sir Marksman" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-gay bigots in the minority in NY |
07 Apr 2005 10:12:43 AM |
|
|
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:%0c5e.31$zD3.122@news.uswest.net...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:XWb5e.30$zD3.47@news.uswest.net...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:wGb5e.14$cu2.322@news.uswest.net...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:PAb5e.12$cu2.491@news.uswest.net...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3ZOdnYseDZhjr8jfRVn-3w@comcast.com...
<anti@sodom.com> wrote
So what? Lot and the other righteous were
in the minority in Sodom.
Sodom, huh? Don't tell me, that was the city which
was "exactly where the bible said it would be," yet
to took over 100 years to find.
That's it, right?
There was no Sodom.
Archaeologists prove you wrong.
I am glad to educate you again.
Really, which archaeologists would that be?
Please provide a cite for this wonderful discovery. Since the
archaeologists in Israel seem to be having a hard time finding this
place. Maybe we can help them out.
I am sorry that you are so ignorant and cannot do your own research.
If you'd like me to do it for you, I charge $50.00 an hour.
I have, you lie, thought so.
Please provide your PROOF that I lied. If you cannot provide any, you
admit that it is you who is the LIAR.
You said:
"Archaeologists prove you wrong."
I asked:
"Please provide a cite for this wonderful discovery. Since the
archaeologists in Israel seem to be having a hard time finding this
place. Maybe we can help them out."
You said:
"I am sorry that you are so ignorant and cannot do your own research"
Which is a lie.
So you have no proof I lied. Therefore you admit you are a LIAR.
Thanks again!
And you have no evidence to support your claim.
You claimed I was a liar, yet you post no support.
Your lady are a LIAR.
Thanks for admitting it.
Cheers!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rev. Karl E. Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-gay bigots in the minority in NY |
07 Apr 2005 10:17:41 AM |
|
|
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:%0c5e.31$zD3.122@news.uswest.net...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:XWb5e.30$zD3.47@news.uswest.net...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:wGb5e.14$cu2.322@news.uswest.net...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:PAb5e.12$cu2.491@news.uswest.net...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3ZOdnYseDZhjr8jfRVn-3w@comcast.com...
<anti@sodom.com> wrote
So what? Lot and the other righteous were
in the minority in Sodom.
Sodom, huh? Don't tell me, that was the city which
was "exactly where the bible said it would be," yet
to took over 100 years to find.
That's it, right?
There was no Sodom.
Archaeologists prove you wrong.
I am glad to educate you again.
Really, which archaeologists would that be?
Please provide a cite for this wonderful discovery. Since the
archaeologists in Israel seem to be having a hard time finding this
place. Maybe we can help them out.
I am sorry that you are so ignorant and cannot do your own research.
If you'd like me to do it for you, I charge $50.00 an hour.
I have, you lie, thought so.
Please provide your PROOF that I lied. If you cannot provide any, you
admit that it is you who is the LIAR.
You said:
"Archaeologists prove you wrong."
I asked:
"Please provide a cite for this wonderful discovery. Since the
archaeologists in Israel seem to be having a hard time finding this
place. Maybe we can help them out."
You said:
"I am sorry that you are so ignorant and cannot do your own research"
Which is a lie.
So you have no proof I lied. Therefore you admit you are a LIAR.
Thanks again!
And you have no evidence to support your claim.
You claimed I was a liar, yet you post no support.
Your lady are a LIAR.
Thanks for admitting it.
Obviously, reading is a new experience for you. So is comprehension
apparently..
Now, what is your cite for your claim? Or are you admitting that you
lied when you said:
"Archaeologists prove you wrong."
--
There are none more ignorant and useless,
than they that seek answers on their knees,
with their eyes closed.
____________________________________________________________________
Rev. Karl E. Taylor
A.A #1143 PLONKED by Bob
Apostle of Dr. Lao EAC: Virgin Conversion Unit Director
____________________________________________________________________
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sir Marksman" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-gay bigots in the minority in NY |
07 Apr 2005 10:20:31 AM |
|
|
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:v8c5e.34$zD3.161@news.uswest.net...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:%0c5e.31$zD3.122@news.uswest.net...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:XWb5e.30$zD3.47@news.uswest.net...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:wGb5e.14$cu2.322@news.uswest.net...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:PAb5e.12$cu2.491@news.uswest.net...
Sir Marksman wrote:
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3ZOdnYseDZhjr8jfRVn-3w@comcast.com...
<anti@sodom.com> wrote
So what? Lot and the other righteous were
in the minority in Sodom.
Sodom, huh? Don't tell me, that was the city which
was "exactly where the bible said it would be," yet
to took over 100 years to find.
That's it, right?
There was no Sodom.
Archaeologists prove you wrong.
I am glad to educate you again.
Really, which archaeologists would that be?
Please provide a cite for this wonderful discovery. Since the
archaeologists in Israel seem to be having a hard time finding this
place. Maybe we can help them out.
I am sorry that you are so ignorant and cannot do your own research.
If you'd like me to do it for you, I charge $50.00 an hour.
I have, you lie, thought so.
Please provide your PROOF that I lied. If you cannot provide any, you
admit that it is you who is the LIAR.
You said:
"Archaeologists prove you wrong."
I asked:
"Please provide a cite for this wonderful discovery. Since the
archaeologists in Israel seem to be having a hard time finding this
place. Maybe we can help them out."
You said:
"I am sorry that you are so ignorant and cannot do your own research"
Which is a lie.
So you have no proof I lied. Therefore you admit you are a LIAR.
Thanks again!
And you have no evidence to support your claim.
You claimed I was a liar, yet you post no support.
Your lady are a LIAR.
Thanks for admitting it.
Obviously,
Glad you admit to being a LIAR, case closed.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
