| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Harlow V. A. Campbell" |
| Date: |
10 Nov 2005 05:17:08 PM |
| Object: |
Anyone Still Against The Death Penalty? |
"Mike Painter" <mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:aYxcf.25619$6e1.1517@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
There's no debate. The appeals process costs the state millions and a
separate holding facility is needed for those awaiting execution.
The cost of adding a few people to a population of thousands is essentially
zero.
No new buildings, no new facilities and no additional guards.
If you've ever fed 100 people you know there is always enough to feed 110 so
even the cost of food is essentially zero.
You fucking scumbag.
You've reduced the life of an 11 year old girl...Someone's baby girl,
to
dollars and cents. The maggot that took away the sunshine of her
parent's
lives, a girl that undoubtedly brought happiness to many, he deserves
to
be put to death.
Any society that doesn't put "women and children" first
is doomed. Anyone who would see this piece of human filth remain alive
should re-think their oh-so-liberal fucking excuse for a life.
.
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: Anyone Still Against The Death Penalty? |
10 Nov 2005 06:41:42 PM |
|
|
Harlow V. A. Campbell wrote:
"Mike Painter" <mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:aYxcf.25619$6e1.1517@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
There's no debate. The appeals process costs the state millions and a
separate holding facility is needed for those awaiting execution.
The cost of adding a few people to a population of thousands is
essentially zero.
No new buildings, no new facilities and no additional guards.
If you've ever fed 100 people you know there is always enough to
feed 110 so even the cost of food is essentially zero.
You fucking scumbag.
You've reduced the life of an 11 year old girl...Someone's baby girl,
to
dollars and cents. The maggot that took away the sunshine of her
parent's
lives, a girl that undoubtedly brought happiness to many, he deserves
to
be put to death.
No, I've reduced the barbaric idea that killing somebody for killing
somebody is cheaper than letting them live.
If you don't think it's about money and conviction rates, you don't live in
the same world I do.
Any society that doesn't put "women and children" first
is doomed. Anyone who would see this piece of human filth remain alive
should re-think their oh-so-liberal fucking excuse for a life.
Then this society is doomed. The idea that women and children are put first
in anything but old movies about sinking ships is laughable.
You can rape a woman on a city street and have a better chance of not even
going to trial then if you grabbed a wallet from a man on the same street.
Only about 1 in 5 rape cases go to trial and the conviction rate is very
low.
The vast majority of rapes in this country are not reported to law
enforcement and if you were raped on a college campus the campus police will
actively discourage you from reporting.
We know that because we can compare the number of calls we get with what
gets reported and we know that we don't get all of them.
Spend time with child protective services and you will find out how children
are put "first"
They are understaffed and can only respond to the worst cases. Most of the
time since being with the family is considered the best place for a child
there is nothing they can do with cases where the abuse is mild.
When the kids are living literally in *****, starved and beaten on a regular
basis they *may* be able to get them out.
This society may some day put women and children on an equal footing with
men but it's not going to happen soon and it never happened in the past.
How many hours a month do you spend doing something for these people?
I spend a minimum of 36 hours and most rape crisis centers always need
volunteers.
.
|
|
|
| User: "http://www.whereisthemoney.org/" |
|
| Title: Re: Anyone Still Against The Death Penalty? |
10 Nov 2005 07:00:19 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:41:42 GMT, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
I've reduced the barbaric idea that killing somebody for killing
somebody is cheaper than letting them live.
If you don't think it's about money and conviction rates, you don't live in
the same world I do.
It's about both. There's two types of killers:
1. Those created by socio-economic injustice who are fighting for survival
2. Psychological deviants who have genetically inherited faulty social
coping abilities.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim07D5" |
|
| Title: Re: Anyone Still Against The Death Penalty? |
10 Nov 2005 08:05:27 PM |
|
|
"http://www.whereisthemoney.org/" <truth@R.us> said:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:41:42 GMT, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
I've reduced the barbaric idea that killing somebody for killing
somebody is cheaper than letting them live.
If you don't think it's about money and conviction rates, you don't live in
the same world I do.
It's about both. There's two types of killers:
1. Those created by socio-economic injustice who are fighting for survival
2. Psychological deviants who have genetically inherited faulty social
coping abilities.
Freedom fighters and terrorists, respectively.
--- Jim07D5
.
|
|
|
| User: "http://www.whereisthemoney.org/" |
|
| Title: Re: Anyone Still Against The Death Penalty? |
10 Nov 2005 09:10:33 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:05:27 GMT, Jim07D5 <Jim07D5@nospam.net> wrote:
"http://www.whereisthemoney.org/" <truth@R.us> said:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:41:42 GMT, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
I've reduced the barbaric idea that killing somebody for killing
somebody is cheaper than letting them live.
If you don't think it's about money and conviction rates, you don't live in
the same world I do.
It's about both. There's two types of killers:
1. Those created by socio-economic injustice who are fighting for survival
2. Psychological deviants who have genetically inherited faulty social
coping abilities.
Freedom fighters and terrorists, respectively.
In the Orwellian corporate mind-kill World of 1984 and 2005, those two
words are synonymous.
--- Jim07D5
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim07D5" |
|
| Title: Re: Anyone Still Against The Death Penalty? |
10 Nov 2005 09:41:54 PM |
|
|
"http://www.whereisthemoney.org/" <truth@R.us> said:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:05:27 GMT, Jim07D5 <Jim07D5@nospam.net> wrote:
"http://www.whereisthemoney.org/" <truth@R.us> said:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:41:42 GMT, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
I've reduced the barbaric idea that killing somebody for killing
somebody is cheaper than letting them live.
If you don't think it's about money and conviction rates, you don't live in
the same world I do.
It's about both. There's two types of killers:
1. Those created by socio-economic injustice who are fighting for survival
2. Psychological deviants who have genetically inherited faulty social
coping abilities.
Freedom fighters and terrorists, respectively.
In the Orwellian corporate mind-kill World of 1984 and 2005, those two
words are synonymous.
Yes, they pick out the same individuals from a crowd, the only
difference being which side does the picking.
--- Jim07D5
.
|
|
|
| User: "http://www.whereisthemoney.org/" |
|
| Title: Re: Anyone Still Against The Death Penalty? |
10 Nov 2005 09:53:33 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 21:41:54 GMT, Jim07D5 <Jim07D5@nospam.net> wrote:
"http://www.whereisthemoney.org/" <truth@R.us> said:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:05:27 GMT, Jim07D5 <Jim07D5@nospam.net> wrote:
"http://www.whereisthemoney.org/" <truth@R.us> said:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:41:42 GMT, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
I've reduced the barbaric idea that killing somebody for killing
somebody is cheaper than letting them live.
If you don't think it's about money and conviction rates, you don't live in
the same world I do.
It's about both. There's two types of killers:
1. Those created by socio-economic injustice who are fighting for survival
2. Psychological deviants who have genetically inherited faulty social
coping abilities.
Freedom fighters and terrorists, respectively.
In the Orwellian corporate mind-kill World of 1984 and 2005, those two
words are synonymous.
Yes, they pick out the same individuals from a crowd, the only
difference being which side does the picking.
You have two sides:
1. Those who want to own the world and all that's in it.
2. Those who just want life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness & for
everyone to mind their own business
Obviously the two philosophies are in diametric opposition to each other.
--- Jim07D5
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim07D5" |
|
| Title: Re: Anyone Still Against The Death Penalty? |
10 Nov 2005 10:14:06 PM |
|
|
"http://www.whereisthemoney.org/" <truth@R.us> said:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 21:41:54 GMT, Jim07D5 <Jim07D5@nospam.net> wrote:
"http://www.whereisthemoney.org/" <truth@R.us> said:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:05:27 GMT, Jim07D5 <Jim07D5@nospam.net> wrote:
"http://www.whereisthemoney.org/" <truth@R.us> said:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:41:42 GMT, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
I've reduced the barbaric idea that killing somebody for killing
somebody is cheaper than letting them live.
If you don't think it's about money and conviction rates, you don't live in
the same world I do.
It's about both. There's two types of killers:
1. Those created by socio-economic injustice who are fighting for survival
2. Psychological deviants who have genetically inherited faulty social
coping abilities.
Freedom fighters and terrorists, respectively.
In the Orwellian corporate mind-kill World of 1984 and 2005, those two
words are synonymous.
Yes, they pick out the same individuals from a crowd, the only
difference being which side does the picking.
You have two sides:
1. Those who want to own the world and all that's in it.
2. Those who just want life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness & for
everyone to mind their own business
Obviously the two philosophies are in diametric opposition to each other.
Those who want not to be owned, and those who want to own them.
--- Jim07D5
.
|
|
|
| User: "http://www.whereisthemoney.org/" |
|
| Title: Re: Anyone Still Against The Death Penalty? |
10 Nov 2005 10:20:59 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 22:14:06 GMT, Jim07D5 <Jim07D5@nospam.net> wrote:
"http://www.whereisthemoney.org/" <truth@R.us> said:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 21:41:54 GMT, Jim07D5 <Jim07D5@nospam.net> wrote:
"http://www.whereisthemoney.org/" <truth@R.us> said:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:05:27 GMT, Jim07D5 <Jim07D5@nospam.net> wrote:
"http://www.whereisthemoney.org/" <truth@R.us> said:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:41:42 GMT, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
I've reduced the barbaric idea that killing somebody for killing
somebody is cheaper than letting them live.
If you don't think it's about money and conviction rates, you don't live in
the same world I do.
It's about both. There's two types of killers:
1. Those created by socio-economic injustice who are fighting for survival
2. Psychological deviants who have genetically inherited faulty social
coping abilities.
Freedom fighters and terrorists, respectively.
In the Orwellian corporate mind-kill World of 1984 and 2005, those two
words are synonymous.
Yes, they pick out the same individuals from a crowd, the only
difference being which side does the picking.
You have two sides:
1. Those who want to own the world and all that's in it.
2. Those who just want life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness & for
everyone to mind their own business
Obviously the two philosophies are in diametric opposition to each other.
Those who want not to be owned, and those who want to own them.
Those who want to be the slave owners delude themselves into believing they
have the divine right to own slaves & blind side themselves into believing
they are not co-dependant on their slaves for their OWN survival.
--- Jim07D5
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dubh Ghall" |
|
| Title: Re: Anyone Still Against The Death Penalty? |
11 Nov 2005 05:43:12 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 21:53:33 GMT, "http://www.whereisthemoney.org/" <truth@R.us>
wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 21:41:54 GMT, Jim07D5 <Jim07D5@nospam.net> wrote:
"http://www.whereisthemoney.org/" <truth@R.us> said:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:05:27 GMT, Jim07D5 <Jim07D5@nospam.net> wrote:
"http://www.whereisthemoney.org/" <truth@R.us> said:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:41:42 GMT, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
I've reduced the barbaric idea that killing somebody for killing
somebody is cheaper than letting them live.
If you don't think it's about money and conviction rates, you don't live in
the same world I do.
It's about both. There's two types of killers:
1. Those created by socio-economic injustice who are fighting for survival
2. Psychological deviants who have genetically inherited faulty social
coping abilities.
Freedom fighters and terrorists, respectively.
In the Orwellian corporate mind-kill World of 1984 and 2005, those two
words are synonymous.
Yes, they pick out the same individuals from a crowd, the only
difference being which side does the picking.
You have two sides:
1. Those who want to own the world and all that's in it.
1a: Those who already think they do. (:-)
2. Those who just want life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness & for
everyone to mind their own business
Obviously the two philosophies are in diametric opposition to each other.
--- Jim07D5
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dubh Ghall" |
|
| Title: Re: Anyone Still Against The Death Penalty? |
11 Nov 2005 05:39:33 PM |
|
|
On 10 Nov 2005 09:17:08 -0800, "Harlow V. A. Campbell"
<harlowcampbell@gmail.com> wrote:
You fucking scumbag.
"Fucking", is a naughty word, Harlow; Jesus won't like it.
You've reduced the life of an 11 year old girl...Someone's baby girl,
to
dollars and cents.
Just exactly as the courts would do, if she had died on a fair ground ride.
The maggot that took away the sunshine of her
parent's
lives, a girl that undoubtedly brought happiness to many, he deserves
to
be put to death.
Perhaps. But let us look at it from a purely hypothetical angle.
Let us imagine that another young girl, has been killed, on that fairground that
I mentioned.
The ride that killed her, was yours, and death was the direct result of bad
maintenance, and inadequate safety precautions.
You have killed her, negligent murder.
Now you are being sued for damages.
Remember that you are (The maggot that took away the sunshine of her
parent's lives, a girl that undoubtedly brought happiness to many),
Will you defend your self?
Or do you agree (he deserves to be put to death.)?
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
