Religions > Atheism > AQOTM: Malcolm Refutes Twelve Common Atheist Arguments, by Ron Baker (Pluralitas!)
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Michael Gray" |
| Date: |
15 Apr 2006 03:56:24 AM |
| Object: |
AQOTM: Malcolm Refutes Twelve Common Atheist Arguments, by Ron Baker (Pluralitas!) |
I hereby nominate Ron Baker for the Atheist Quote of the Month, with
this fine, accurate and incredibly succinct observation:
From: "Ron Baker, Pluralitas!" <stoshu@bellsouth.net.pa>
<in response to>
"Neil Kelsey" <neil_kelsey@hotmail.com> wrote in message
:
Hints on debating atheists.
<nominated portion>
Step 1: If you don't want to lose then don't
actually debate atheists.
</nominated portion>
</in response to>
--
.
|
|
| User: "Ron Baker, Pluralitas!" |
|
| Title: Re: AQOTM: Malcolm Refutes Twelve Common Atheist Arguments, by Ron Baker (Pluralitas!) |
16 Apr 2006 12:46:43 AM |
|
|
"Michael Gray" <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in message
news:e9d1421en4fldr433jp6dk0utpmm83gfhk@4ax.com...
I hereby nominate Ron Baker for the Atheist Quote of the Month, with
this fine, accurate and incredibly succinct observation:
From: "Ron Baker, Pluralitas!" <stoshu@bellsouth.net.pa>
<in response to>
"Neil Kelsey" <neil_kelsey@hotmail.com> wrote in message
:
Hints on debating atheists.
<nominated portion>
Step 1: If you don't want to lose then don't
actually debate atheists.
</nominated portion>
</in response to>
Thanks for the nomination. :)
--
rb
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: AQOTM: Malcolm Refutes Twelve Common Atheist Arguments, by Ron Baker (Pluralitas!) |
16 Apr 2006 01:39:48 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 05:46:43 GMT, "Ron Baker, Pluralitas!"
<stoshu@bellsouth.net.pa> wrote:
- Refer: <7Tk0g.4940$3W1.3692@tornado.socal.rr.com>
"Michael Gray" <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in message
news:e9d1421en4fldr433jp6dk0utpmm83gfhk@4ax.com...
I hereby nominate Ron Baker for the Atheist Quote of the Month, with
this fine, accurate and incredibly succinct observation:
From: "Ron Baker, Pluralitas!" <stoshu@bellsouth.net.pa>
<in response to>
"Neil Kelsey" <neil_kelsey@hotmail.com> wrote in message
:
Hints on debating atheists.
<nominated portion>
Step 1: If you don't want to lose then don't
actually debate atheists.
</nominated portion>
</in response to>
Thanks for the nomination. :)
Arrggh, it be cursed, the nomination do,
I tell thee, ya scurvy sea-dog!
Cursed!
Ye'll be losin' yer faith soon enough!
Mark me words, matey!
And shiver me Timbers o' the cross.
--
Michael Gray
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: AQOTM: Malcolm Refutes Twelve Common Atheist Arguments, by Ron Baker (Pluralitas!) |
15 Apr 2006 04:33:46 AM |
|
|
Michael Gray wrote:
I hereby nominate Ron Baker for the Atheist Quote of the Month, with
this fine, accurate and incredibly succinct observation:
From: "Ron Baker, Pluralitas!" <stoshu@bellsouth.net.pa>
<in response to>
"Neil Kelsey" <neil_kelsey@hotmail.com> wrote in message
:
Hints on debating atheists.
<nominated portion>
Step 1: If you don't want to lose then don't
actually debate atheists.
</nominated portion>
</in response to>
--
Heartily seconded! Hey Michael, in which thread was this originally
published?
-Panama Floyd, Atl.
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
EAC Department of Telepropaganda
"..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next."
-Mark Twain
Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones:
http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "*nemo*" |
|
| Title: Re: AQOTM: Malcolm Refutes Twelve Common Atheist Arguments, by Ron Baker (Pluralitas!) |
16 Apr 2006 03:01:30 PM |
|
|
In article <1145093626.365055.324000@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
wrote:
Michael Gray wrote:
I hereby nominate Ron Baker for the Atheist Quote of the Month, with
this fine, accurate and incredibly succinct observation:
From: "Ron Baker, Pluralitas!" <stoshu@bellsouth.net.pa>
<in response to>
"Neil Kelsey" <neil_kelsey@hotmail.com> wrote in message
:
Hints on debating atheists.
<nominated portion>
Step 1: If you don't want to lose then don't
actually debate atheists.
</nominated portion>
</in response to>
--
Heartily seconded!
Recorded.
Hey Michael, in which thread was this originally
published?
-Panama Floyd, Atl.
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
EAC Department of Telepropaganda
"..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next."
-Mark Twain
Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones:
http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html
--
Nemo - EAC Commissioner for Bible Belt Underwater Operations.
Atheist #1331 (the Palindrome of doom!)
BAAWA Knight! - One of those warm Southern Knights, y'all!
Charter member, SMASH!!
http://home.earthlink.net/~jehdjh/Relpg.html
Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus
Quotemeister since March 2002
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: AQOTM: Malcolm Refutes Twelve Common Atheist Arguments, by Ron Baker (Pluralitas!) |
15 Apr 2006 05:52:01 AM |
|
|
On 15 Apr 2006 02:33:46 -0700, wrote:
- Refer: <1145093626.365055.324000@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
Michael Gray wrote:
I hereby nominate Ron Baker for the Atheist Quote of the Month, with
this fine, accurate and incredibly succinct observation:
From: "Ron Baker, Pluralitas!" <stoshu@bellsouth.net.pa>
<in response to>
"Neil Kelsey" <neil_kelsey@hotmail.com> wrote in message
:
Hints on debating atheists.
<nominated portion>
Step 1: If you don't want to lose then don't
actually debate atheists.
</nominated portion>
</in response to>
--
Heartily seconded! Hey Michael, in which thread was this originally
published?
Bugger. I knew that I missed something.
It bloody hard to type whilst nailed onto a cross.
Newsgroups: alt.atheism
References: <1144970845.699849.170810@t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
<mFF%f.709$WA3.45@tornado.socal.rr.com>
<nlku32pd5upfafrftt27sm817fjvkmlrkn@4ax.com>
Subject: Re: Malcolm Refutes Twelve Common Atheist Arguments
Lines: 33
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
Message-ID: <3ZZ%f.2304$3W1.826@tornado.socal.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 03:42:55 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.75.131.111
--
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: AQOTM: Malcolm Refutes Twelve Common Atheist Arguments, by Ron Baker (Pluralitas!) |
15 Apr 2006 08:44:03 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 18:26:24 +0930, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote:
I hereby nominate Ron Baker for the Atheist Quote of the Month, with
this fine, accurate and incredibly succinct observation:
From: "Ron Baker, Pluralitas!" <stoshu@bellsouth.net.pa>
<in response to>
"Neil Kelsey" <neil_kelsey@hotmail.com> wrote in message
:
Hints on debating atheists.
<nominated portion>
Step 1: If you don't want to lose then don't
actually debate atheists.
</nominated portion>
</in response to>
seconded
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: AQOTM: Malcolm Refutes Twelve Common Atheist Arguments, by Ron Baker (Pluralitas!) |
15 Apr 2006 06:49:28 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 18:26:24 +0930, Michael Gray <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com>
wrote:
<nominated portion>
Step 1: If you don't want to lose then don't
actually debate atheists.
</nominated portion>
Rejected. Unless in the comedy category. The easiest thing to do is debate an
atheist on religious matters. Atheists are one dumb lot.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: AQOTM: Malcolm Refutes Twelve Common Atheist Arguments, by RonBaker (Pluralitas!) |
15 Apr 2006 11:33:19 AM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 18:26:24 +0930, Michael Gray <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com>
wrote:
<nominated portion>
Step 1: If you don't want to lose then don't
actually debate atheists.
</nominated portion>
Rejected. Unless in the comedy category. The easiest thing to do is debate an
atheist on religious matters. Atheists are one dumb lot.
You are not an atheist. You cannot vote on QOTM. By the way, duke,
every atheist here on alt.atheism thinks that you are either a complete
waste of time or a source of comic relief. Absolutely no atheist
believes you and you frequently (read: always) lose debates. The only
thing you have ever provided was 5 debunked assertions. The rest is
bravado, bluster, insult, and copious amounts of guesswork and wishful
thinking.
You have shown, in the past, to be ill-informed when it comes to the
Bible, geology, archaeology, science, and astronomy.
You have failed to live up to the Bible's expectations of you. You do
not even know what to do in a group that does not want your brand of "help."
Why are you even here in alt.atheism?
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Torture has never been a reliable means of *
* extracting information.... One wonders why it *
* is still practiced." --Jean-Luc Picard *
****************************************************
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doc Smartass" |
|
| Title: Re: AQOTM: Malcolm Refutes Twelve Common Atheist Arguments, by Ron Baker (Pluralitas!) |
15 Apr 2006 05:52:27 PM |
|
|
DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in
news:44411ec4$0$15281$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com:
duke wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 18:26:24 +0930, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote:
<nominated portion>
Step 1: If you don't want to lose then don't
actually debate atheists.
</nominated portion>
Rejected. Unless in the comedy category. The easiest thing to do
is debate an atheist on religious matters. Atheists are one dumb
lot.
You are not an atheist. You cannot vote on QOTM. By the way, duke,
every atheist here on alt.atheism thinks that you are either a
complete waste of time or a source of comic relief. Absolutely no
atheist believes you and you frequently (read: always) lose debates.
The only thing you have ever provided was 5 debunked assertions. The
rest is bravado, bluster, insult, and copious amounts of guesswork and
wishful thinking.
You have shown, in the past, to be ill-informed when it comes to the
Bible, geology, archaeology, science, and astronomy.
He's so dumb he moves his lips when someone ELSE is reading.
--
Doc Smartass
Most truths are so naked that people feel sorry for them and cover them
up, at least a little bit.
--Edward R. Murrow
.
|
|
|
| User: "Harry F. Leopold" |
|
| Title: AQOTM Nomination (was Re: AQOTM: Malcolm Refutes Twelve Common Atheist Arguments, by Ron Baker (Pluralitas!)) |
16 Apr 2006 02:53:31 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 17:52:27 -0500, Doc Smartass wrote
(in article <Xns97A6B65F1115Faskifyouwantit@216.77.188.18>):
DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in
news:44411ec4$0$15281$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com:
duke wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 18:26:24 +0930, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote:
<nominated portion>
Step 1: If you don't want to lose then don't
actually debate atheists.
</nominated portion>
Rejected. Unless in the comedy category. The easiest thing to do
is debate an atheist on religious matters. Atheists are one dumb
lot.
You are not an atheist. You cannot vote on QOTM. By the way, duke,
every atheist here on alt.atheism thinks that you are either a
complete waste of time or a source of comic relief. Absolutely no
atheist believes you and you frequently (read: always) lose debates.
The only thing you have ever provided was 5 debunked assertions. The
rest is bravado, bluster, insult, and copious amounts of guesswork and
wishful thinking.
You have shown, in the past, to be ill-informed when it comes to the
Bible, geology, archaeology, science, and astronomy.
He's so dumb he moves his lips when someone ELSE is reading.
I nominate Doc's comment above. Seconds, anyone?
(And I am keeping it for a sig as well.)
--
Harry F. Leopold
aa #2076
AA/Vet #4
The Prints of Darkness
(remove gene to email)
³Mr. Worf, set phasers on "***** You" and fire at will.³ - Doc Smartass
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: AQOTM Nomination (was Re: AQOTM: Malcolm Refutes Twelve Common Atheist Arguments, by Ron Baker (Pluralitas!)) |
16 Apr 2006 03:17:30 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 02:53:31 -0500, Harry F. Leopold
<hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote:
- Refer: <0001HW.C067622B000A517EF0305530@news.central.cox.net>
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 17:52:27 -0500, Doc Smartass wrote
(in article <Xns97A6B65F1115Faskifyouwantit@216.77.188.18>):
DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in
news:44411ec4$0$15281$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com:
duke wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 18:26:24 +0930, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote:
<nominated portion>
Step 1: If you don't want to lose then don't
actually debate atheists.
</nominated portion>
Rejected. Unless in the comedy category. The easiest thing to do
is debate an atheist on religious matters. Atheists are one dumb
lot.
You are not an atheist. You cannot vote on QOTM. By the way, duke,
every atheist here on alt.atheism thinks that you are either a
complete waste of time or a source of comic relief. Absolutely no
atheist believes you and you frequently (read: always) lose debates.
The only thing you have ever provided was 5 debunked assertions. The
rest is bravado, bluster, insult, and copious amounts of guesswork and
wishful thinking.
You have shown, in the past, to be ill-informed when it comes to the
Bible, geology, archaeology, science, and astronomy.
He's so dumb he moves his lips when someone ELSE is reading.
I nominate Doc's comment above. Seconds, anyone?
(And I am keeping it for a sig as well.)
This could get administratively confusing.
A nested nomination, I mean...
--
Michael Gray
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: AQOTM: Malcolm Refutes Twelve Common Atheist Arguments, by Ron Baker (Pluralitas!) |
15 Apr 2006 11:05:28 PM |
|
|
DanielSan wrote:
You are not an atheist. You cannot vote on QOTM. By the way, duke,
every atheist here on alt.atheism thinks that you are either a
complete waste of time or a source of comic relief. Absolutely no
atheist believes you and you frequently (read: always) lose debates. The
only
thing you have ever provided was 5 debunked assertions. The rest is
bravado, bluster, insult, and copious amounts of guesswork and wishful
thinking.
The above should be:
" every <blank1> here on <blank2> thinks that you are either a complete
waste of time or a source of comic relief. Absolutely no <blank1> believes
you and you frequently (read: always) lose debates. "
You can fill in <blank1> with any group of people and <blank2> with any
usergroup.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill" |
|
| Title: Re: AQOTM: Malcolm Refutes Twelve Common Atheist Arguments, by Ron Baker (Pluralitas!) |
15 Apr 2006 03:08:32 PM |
|
|
Duke is mentally retarded. Treat him kindly.
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:44411ec4$0$15281$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com...
duke wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 18:26:24 +0930, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com>
wrote:
<nominated portion>
Step 1: If you don't want to lose then don't
actually debate atheists.
</nominated portion>
Rejected. Unless in the comedy category. The easiest thing to do is
debate an
atheist on religious matters. Atheists are one dumb lot.
You are not an atheist. You cannot vote on QOTM. By the way, duke, every
atheist here on alt.atheism thinks that you are either a complete waste of
time or a source of comic relief. Absolutely no atheist believes you and
you frequently (read: always) lose debates. The only thing you have ever
provided was 5 debunked assertions. The rest is bravado, bluster, insult,
and copious amounts of guesswork and wishful thinking.
You have shown, in the past, to be ill-informed when it comes to the
Bible, geology, archaeology, science, and astronomy.
You have failed to live up to the Bible's expectations of you. You do not
even know what to do in a group that does not want your brand of "help."
Why are you even here in alt.atheism?
--
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "Torture has never been a reliable means of *
* extracting information.... One wonders why it *
* is still practiced." --Jean-Luc Picard *
****************************************************
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "AZ Nomad" |
|
| Title: Re: AQOTM: Malcolm Refutes Twelve Common Atheist Arguments, by Ron Baker (Pluralitas!) |
15 Apr 2006 09:55:08 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 16:08:32 -0400, Bill <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Duke is mentally retarded. Treat him kindly.
I agree. Duke is just another christian poster child. Duke is like the
meth-addict with most of his teeth missing. Instead of calcium loss, duke
has brain loss. We should pitty him and generaously display his idiocy as
a warning to anybody who would harm themselves with duke's brand of poison.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: AQOTM: Malcolm Refutes Twelve Common Atheist Arguments, by Ron Baker (Pluralitas!) |
15 Apr 2006 08:17:23 PM |
|
|
Previously, on alt.atheism, DanielSan in episode
<44411ec4$0$15281$6d36acad@taz.nntpserver.com>...
duke wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 18:26:24 +0930, Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote:
<nominated portion>
Step 1: If you don't want to lose then don't
actually debate atheists.
</nominated portion>
Rejected. Unless in the comedy category. The easiest thing to do is
debate an atheist on religious matters. Atheists are one dumb lot.
You are not an atheist. You cannot vote on QOTM. By the way, duke, every
atheist here on alt.atheism thinks that you are either a complete waste of
time or a source of comic relief. Absolutely no atheist believes you and
you frequently (read: always) lose debates. The only thing you have ever
provided was 5 debunked assertions. The rest is bravado, bluster, insult,
and copious amounts of guesswork and wishful thinking.
You have shown, in the past, to be ill-informed when it comes to the
Bible, geology, archaeology, science, and astronomy.
You have failed to live up to the Bible's expectations of you. You do not
even know what to do in a group that does not want your brand of "help."
Why are you even here in alt.atheism?
No one else will talk to him...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"Corps chief admits to 'design failure'"
(Took them long enough)
http://makeashorterlink.com/?J3EF62DEC
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: AQOTM: Malcolm Refutes Twelve Common Atheist Arguments, by RonBaker (Pluralitas!) |
15 Apr 2006 04:04:39 PM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 18:26:24 +0930, Michael Gray <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com>
wrote:
<nominated portion>
Step 1: If you don't want to lose then don't
actually debate atheists.
</nominated portion>
Rejected. Unless in the comedy category. The easiest thing to do is debate an
atheist on religious matters. Atheists are one dumb lot.
All you have to do is plug your ears and shout "la-la-la-la I can't hear
you!"
--
Uncle Vic
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC department of little adhesive-backed shiny plastic
L-shaped doo-dads to add feet to Jesus Fish department
It is safe to say that the bible contains equal amounts of fact, history
and pizza.
-Penn Jillette
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrichs effort" |
|
| Title: Re: AQOTM: Malcolm Refutes Twelve Common Atheist Arguments, by Ron Baker (Pluralitas!) |
15 Apr 2006 09:36:44 AM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 18:26:24 +0930, Michael Gray <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com>
wrote:
<nominated portion>
Step 1: If you don't want to lose then don't
actually debate atheists.
</nominated portion>
Rejected. Unless in the comedy category. The easiest thing to do is debate an
atheist on religious matters. Atheists are one dumb lot.
Earl! I see you're still reluctant to join us in reality.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
