AQOTM Proposal: Discovery Institute Responds to Criticism of Kansas Standards



 Religions > Atheism > AQOTM Proposal: Discovery Institute Responds to Criticism of Kansas Standards

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Michael Gray"
Date: 11 Jul 2006 04:56:31 AM
Object: AQOTM Proposal: Discovery Institute Responds to Criticism of Kansas Standards
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:27:55 -0400, Ben Kaufman
<spaXm-mXe-anXd-paXy-5000-dollars@pobox.com> wrote:
- Refer: <l1a6b2911a4igir8snlh04gvlegu25cjme@4ax.com>

On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 19:01:30 -0500, Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com> wrote:

Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Gospel Bretts
(Hallelujah@Jesus.Amen) made the light shine upon us with this:

On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 17:52:55 -0400, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:

On Sun, 9 Jul 2006 14:38:16 -0700, "Dr. Tom Snyder"
<titus213@adelphia.net> wrote:

You obviously didn't read the article.


You're obviously a stupid, dishonest, in-your-face liar.


Didn't we already prove that about Dorktor Snyder a few weeks ago?
What's he doing back here then?

In response to Uncle Vic:

Proving a creationist wrong only proves you hate god, so they keep coming
back to witness.

Ben Kaufman wrote:
<nominated bit>

It's like trying to have a meaningful conversation with my dog. She pretends to
listen but she's just there for the biscuit. :-)

</nominated bit>
--
.

User: "Pastor Kutchie"

Title: Re: AQOTM Proposal: Discovery Institute Responds to Criticism of Kansas Standards 11 Jul 2006 05:19:08 AM
Michael Gray wrote

In response to Uncle Vic:

Proving a creationist wrong only proves you hate god, so they keep coming
back to witness.


Ben Kaufman wrote:
<nominated bit>

It's like trying to have a meaningful conversation with my dog. She pretends to
listen but she's just there for the biscuit. :-)


</nominated bit>

--

_That's_ a simile.
Seconded.
.
User: "*nemo*"

Title: Re: AQOTM Proposal: Discovery Institute Responds to Criticism of Kansas Standards 14 Jul 2006 04:28:31 AM
In article <1152613148.213679.9960@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>,
"Pastor Kutchie" <user13@heathens.org.uk> wrote:

Michael Gray wrote

In response to Uncle Vic:

Proving a creationist wrong only proves you hate god, so they keep coming
back to witness.


Ben Kaufman wrote:
<nominated bit>

It's like trying to have a meaningful conversation with my dog. She
pretends to
listen but she's just there for the biscuit. :-)


</nominated bit>

--

_That's_ a simile.

Seconded.

Recorded.
--
Nemo - EAC Commissioner for Bible Belt Underwater Operations.
Atheist #1331 (the Palindrome of doom!)
BAAWA Knight! - One of those warm Southern Knights, y'all!
Charter member, SMASH!!
http://home.earthlink.net/~jehdjh/Relpg.html
Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus
Quotemeister since March 2002
.

User: "Michael Gray"

Title: Re: AQOTM Proposal: Discovery Institute Responds to Criticism of Kansas Standards 11 Jul 2006 08:41:19 PM
On 11 Jul 2006 03:19:08 -0700, "Pastor Kutchie"
<user13@heathens.org.uk> wrote:
- Refer: <1152613148.213679.9960@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>


Michael Gray wrote

In response to Uncle Vic:

Proving a creationist wrong only proves you hate god, so they keep coming
back to witness.


Ben Kaufman wrote:
<nominated bit>

It's like trying to have a meaningful conversation with my dog. She pretends to
listen but she's just there for the biscuit. :-)


</nominated bit>

--

_That's_ a simile.

Seconded.

A Smilie Simile, no less!
--
.


User: "Matt Silberstein"

Title: Re: AQOTM Proposal: Discovery Institute Responds to Criticism of Kansas Standards 11 Jul 2006 11:15:53 AM
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 19:26:31 +0930, in alt.atheism , Michael Gray
<fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> in
<7bt6b2ldqor5a0innb2lq3dr1k3j8kfn55@4ax.com> wrote:

On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:27:55 -0400, Ben Kaufman
<spaXm-mXe-anXd-paXy-5000-dollars@pobox.com> wrote:
- Refer: <l1a6b2911a4igir8snlh04gvlegu25cjme@4ax.com>

On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 19:01:30 -0500, Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com> wrote:

Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Gospel Bretts
(Hallelujah@Jesus.Amen) made the light shine upon us with this:

On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 17:52:55 -0400, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:

On Sun, 9 Jul 2006 14:38:16 -0700, "Dr. Tom Snyder"
<titus213@adelphia.net> wrote:

You obviously didn't read the article.


You're obviously a stupid, dishonest, in-your-face liar.


Didn't we already prove that about Dorktor Snyder a few weeks ago?
What's he doing back here then?


In response to Uncle Vic:

Proving a creationist wrong only proves you hate god, so they keep coming
back to witness.


Ben Kaufman wrote:
<nominated bit>

It's like trying to have a meaningful conversation with my dog. She pretends to
listen but she's just there for the biscuit. :-)


</nominated bit>

As long as it is close to on topic, here is the difference between
dogs and cats.
A dog says: "They feed me, they take care of me, they love me, they
must be God."
A cat says : "They feed me, they take care of me, they love me, I must
be God."
--
Matt Silberstein
Do something today about the Darfur Genocide
http://www.beawitness.org
http://www.darfurgenocide.org
http://www.savedarfur.org
"Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER