| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"kevin hollingsworth" |
| Date: |
04 Mar 2004 03:46:55 AM |
| Object: |
Are Buddhists Atheists? |
Is Atheism a absense of religious belief or a absense of God belief? Given
that studies have shown that religious believers live longer and less
stressed lives than non-relgiious believers (I did a google search on this
and it seems to hold up to some scrutiny) wouldn't it be a advantage for
most atheists to have some kind of meditation/relaxation practice in their
lives. Apparently atheists have a higher IQ on average than religious types
(I did a google search on this too!!!) I wonder why this increased
intelligence isn't linked to increased lifespan? I'm talking group
statistics here not individual variations...
.
|
|
| User: "Therion Ware" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Buddhists Atheists? |
04 Mar 2004 04:15:57 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:46:55 -0000 in alt.atheism, kevin hollingsworth
("kevin hollingsworth" <kevin.hollingworth@ntlworld.com>) said,
directing the reply to alt.atheism
Is Atheism a absense of religious belief or a absense of God belief?
Heh. Depends. The classic defs used here in aa are "strong" and "weak"
atheist. IIRC, a strong atheist asserts that there is/are no God(s),
whereas the weak atheist feels the evidence is insufficient to warrant
belief in God(s).
Then there's the bleedin' agnostics, who range from those who don't
hold that there's sufficient evidence to say one way or the other, to
those who feel the whole idea of God is unintelligible.
My feeling is that in real life "we're[1]" all a mixture. Take me for
example[2] - with respect to some God concepts I'm strongly atheist,
with respect to others I'm weakly atheist; still others I feel are
unintelligible, and some are so disconnected from what we can know of
reality that they're worth no more than the cursory consideration that
it takes to determine that. And doubtless there are many variations on
that theme.
Given
that studies have shown that religious believers live longer and less
stressed lives than non-relgiious believers (I did a google search on this
and it seems to hold up to some scrutiny) wouldn't it be a advantage for
most atheists to have some kind of meditation/relaxation practice in their
lives. Apparently atheists have a higher IQ on average than religious types
(I did a google search on this too!!!) I wonder why this increased
intelligence isn't linked to increased lifespan? I'm talking group
statistics here not individual variations...
Well, my reading of such studies as have been conducted is that
keeping an interest in the outside world tends to increase life
expectancy - whether this involves going to church, having a go at
people on aa, or bingo seems to be neither here nor there.
Anyway, the subject of your question was "Are Buddhists Atheists?,".
From what I know of Buddhism, the answer is an unequivocal "no," but a
"no" with a *but*. IIRC, when the Buddha was asked about the Gods, he
replied to the effect "who cares" - which is to say if there are
Gods, it doesn't matter. Which if there are, probably pisses them off
more than anything else could.
Which in my view is probably the best recommendation for Buddhism one
can imagine!
Rgds
TW.
[1]. Yes I know, I'm not speaking for you but for myself. But allow me
a literary flourish!
[2]. If you're attractive enough.
--
"Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You."
- Attrib: Pauline Reage.
Inexpensive VHS & other video to CD/DVD conversion?
See: <http://www.Video2CD.com>. 35.00 gets your video on DVD.
all posts to this email address are automatically deleted without being read.
** atheist poster child #1 ** #442.
.
|
|
|
| User: "SMChristenson" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Buddhists Atheists? |
04 Mar 2004 10:40:09 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 10:15:57 +0000, Therion Ware wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:46:55 -0000 in alt.atheism, kevin hollingsworth
("kevin hollingsworth" <kevin.hollingworth@ntlworld.com>) said,
directing the reply to alt.atheism
Buddhists as atheists
First, let's be very clear. To be Christian, you must believe in miracles
on a massive scale. You must believe in the resurrection. That's the
price of admission. In theory, to call yourself Buddhist, I do not think
belief in miracles is _essential_. I think believing the four noble truths
as life principles and taking some time in the day to clear the mind in
line with these principles is all that is necessary. It is also my
understanding that Buddhism is aware in practice of the different levels
of comprehension people possess. I have heard of a frieze that lay people
pray to for protection against thieves. Monks are taught that the figures
on the frieze are, in fact, the emotions that would steal your peace of
mind. Similar for reincarnation: literal, or one's mind permanently
changed by experiencing a succession of "A-Ha!" revelations? (to use
western terms) A cynical "class structure" -- or just realistic?
As for god as a first cause, I have no idea. Guess that shows how much
Buddhism is a "way of life" or "psychology" that such things seldom get
much print in western introductory articles and books. Not that I would
pass myself off as a practicing Buddhist or scholar of Buddhism, it is
nonetheless slightly interesting that I have never come across Buddhist
cosmology.
In practice, I suspect it can be a lot different. A lot of pop Buddhism
came to the U.S. through a number of authors of Japanese zen. And zen may
have been stripped back down to a psychology there, perhaps under the
influence of an austere Shinto aesthetic. Buddhism in other parts of Asia
could be quite different. You might be aware of Tibetian Buddhism. It is
my understanding that they have magic rites to grow the "immortal foetus".
Christianity has had an effect too. I forget what they are called: "blue
sky"? "clear land"? Buddhists. They believe in
pie-in-the-sky-by-and-by-when-you-die. In fact, Taoism has a heaven at
the north star and, if you've seen an Asian-market Kung Fu movie, you
might have seen demons of the underworld portrayed. So there is a native
Asian tradition for such things and it would be interesting to hear from
someone with hands-on experience how they might cross-pollinate
with Buddhism in street practice. And the whole yin-yang metaphysic,
which might be psychologically interesting, is hardly science and it
would be interesting to see how that has also affected Buddhism in
practice.
Given
that studies have shown that religious believers live longer and less
stressed lives than non-relgiious believers (I did a google search on
this and it seems to hold up to some scrutiny) wouldn't it be a
advantage for most atheists to have some kind of meditation/relaxation
practice in their lives. Apparently atheists have a higher IQ on
average than religious types (I did a google search on this too!!!) I
wonder why this increased intelligence isn't linked to increased
lifespan? I'm talking group statistics here not individual
variations...
Well, my reading of such studies as have been conducted is that keeping
an interest in the outside world tends to increase life expectancy -
whether this involves going to church, having a go at people on aa, or
bingo seems to be neither here nor there.
It was my understanding professors have the longest life expectancy. Not
a lot of cancerous chemicals in the work place or machinery to tear off
arms. Adequate health care, income and retirement. It is true
that academia and the "profoundly gifted" are hardly a perfect correlation
so that select group could have a somewhat lower life expectancy than
academia in general. But I'd like to see the google sources that claim
the profoundly gifted are below average. Everything I've read
positively correlates IQ with lifespan presumably because the intelligent
do fewer stupid fatal actions.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "the cutest atheist" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Buddhists Atheists? |
05 Mar 2004 06:10:21 AM |
|
|
"kevin hollingsworth" <kevin.hollingworth@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:0WC1c.502$sq2.468@newsfe2-gui.server.ntli.net...
Is Atheism a absense of religious belief or a absense of God belief?
Given
that studies have shown that religious believers live longer and less
stressed lives than non-relgiious believers (I did a google search on this
and it seems to hold up to some scrutiny) wouldn't it be a advantage for
most atheists to have some kind of meditation/relaxation practice in their
lives. Apparently atheists have a higher IQ on average than religious
types
(I did a google search on this too!!!) I wonder why this increased
intelligence isn't linked to increased lifespan? I'm talking group
statistics here not individual variations...
yes, buddhists are atheists, for the most part. some sects believe in
god-llike figures, though I don't think they're creative in the christian
sense.
do a google search on whether people with higher IQ's live shorter and
more-stressed lives. there you might actually find a proper correlation. I
plan on living a very long time, btw. but I do have a high IQ and as a
result I'm going into a very technical and high-stress career
hth, hand
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steve Makohin" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Buddhists Atheists? |
04 Mar 2004 10:32:23 PM |
|
|
In article <0WC1c.502$sq2.468@newsfe2-gui.server.ntli.net>,
"kevin hollingsworth" <kevin.hollingworth@ntlworld.com> wrote:
Is Atheism a absense of religious belief or a absense of God belief?
Look "atheism" up in a dictionary and you'll have your answer. It's
either the assertion that deities to not exist, or the lack in deistic
belief. You'll see members of both camps in alt.atheism.
Being an atheist does not preclude one from adopting non-theistic
religious beliefs.
Given that studies have shown that religious believers live longer and
less stressed lives than non-relgiious believers (I did a google search
on this and it seems to hold up to some scrutiny)...
Could you support that with validated data, and not just references to
web sites at which the good folks here can easily throw darts, and
discredit? My understanding of such studies is that they were
inconclusive because so many other factors were at play, the control
group could not be separated on the basis of religion alone (i.e., the
"religious" control group also had a variety of other significant
differences, so the effects of religion alone of life-span could not
be assessed with any degree of accuracy).
Like the old joke goes, maybe for religious folks, it just _seems_
like they live longer ;-)
...wouldn't it be a advantage for most atheists to have some kind
of meditation/relaxation practice in their lives...
That applies to all folks, atheist and theist.
Apparently atheists have a higher IQ on average than religious types
(I did a google search on this too!!!) I wonder why this increased
intelligence isn't linked to increased lifespan? I'm talking group
statistics here not individual variations...
The information to which I have been exposed showed no causal
relationship between religious beliefs and IQ. If you have _validated_
data to support your position, I'm curious about it.
To answer your question, in your subject, are Buddhists atheists, the
answer is no. They are theistic. They believe in a hierarchy of
deities. The Buddha himself was not a deity, but a very enlightened
being. The Buddhist's relationship to his deities is very different
that the Judeo-Christian/God relationship, and requires a lot of
explanation for it to make sense.
-Steve Makohin | Reply to
| (hotmail acct is spam catcher)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sean C" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Buddhists Atheists? |
05 Mar 2004 11:34:49 AM |
|
|
In article <0WC1c.502$sq2.468@newsfe2-gui.server.ntli.net>, kevin
hollingsworth <kevin.hollingworth@ntlworld.com> wrote:
Is Atheism a absense of religious belief or a absense of God belief? Given
that studies have shown that religious believers live longer and less
stressed lives than non-relgiious believers (I did a google search on this
and it seems to hold up to some scrutiny) wouldn't it be a advantage for
most atheists to have some kind of meditation/relaxation practice in their
lives. Apparently atheists have a higher IQ on average than religious types
(I did a google search on this too!!!) I wonder why this increased
intelligence isn't linked to increased lifespan? I'm talking group
statistics here not individual variations...
Gods and superstitious practices figure prominently in a lot of
Buddhist sects, and the demon Mara and Hindu gods are mentioned by name
in the Dhammapada, which is one of the central sacred texts of Buddhism
and supposedly containing the words of the Buddha himself. If anything,
some Buddhist sects merely preach that the gods are unimportant and
unnecessary.
"It was by attention that Indra attained the highest place among the
gods. People approve of attention, while carelessness is always
condemned."
http://dharma.ncf.ca/introduction/sutras/dhammapada/Attention.html
http://dharma.ncf.ca/introduction/sutras/dhammapada.html
Sean C
----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Buddhists Atheists? |
04 Mar 2004 06:23:10 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:46:55 -0000, "kevin hollingsworth"
<kevin.hollingworth@ntlworld.com> wrote:
Is Atheism a absense of religious belief or a absense of God belief? Given
that studies have shown that religious believers live longer and less
stressed lives than non-relgiious believers (I did a google search on this
and it seems to hold up to some scrutiny) wouldn't it be a advantage for
most atheists to have some kind of meditation/relaxation practice in their
lives. Apparently atheists have a higher IQ on average than religious types
(I did a google search on this too!!!) I wonder why this increased
intelligence isn't linked to increased lifespan? I'm talking group
statistics here not individual variations...
Some are, some aren't. Buddhism per se has nothing to say about
atheists. Some Buddhists have gods that are nothing to do with
Buddhism. Others don't.
Which doesn't fit nicely with today's penchant for dividing people
according to labels.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mr. Thorne" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Buddhists Atheists? |
04 Mar 2004 07:02:14 AM |
|
|
in article 0WC1c.502$sq2.468@newsfe2-gui.server.ntli.net, kevin
hollingsworth at wrote on 04 03 2004 1:46:
Is Atheism a absense of religious belief or a absense of God belief? Given
that studies have shown that religious believers live longer and less
stressed lives than non-relgiious believers (I did a google search on this
and it seems to hold up to some scrutiny) wouldn't it be a advantage for
most atheists to have some kind of meditation/relaxation practice in their
lives. Apparently atheists have a higher IQ on average than religious types
(I did a google search on this too!!!) I wonder why this increased
intelligence isn't linked to increased lifespan? I'm talking group
statistics here not individual variations...
Kevin:
Find a copy of the Diamond Sutra, the oldest extant printed book (a good bit
older than Gutenberg's Bible). Just read the intro, and you can see that in
Buddhism, there are many gods. Demons too.
Modern-day Buddhism doesn't much concern itself with the gods. It's much
more about how to live.
Then again, find an uncorrupted version of the Old Testament. It begins like
this: "In the beginning, the Mighty Ones created Heaven and Earth."
When the OT was translated into Greek, the folks who did it tried to remove
the references to many gods and leave the impression that there is but one.
Still, you can find quite a number of places in a modern Bible where there
are still references to many gods, as in the first of the ten commandments.
From my experience, most Buddhists speak as if there were only one god.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ian" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Buddhists Atheists? |
04 Mar 2004 01:16:52 PM |
|
|
In article <BC6C68A7.11B02%>,
said...
in article 0WC1c.502$sq2.468@newsfe2-gui.server.ntli.net, kevin
hollingsworth at wrote on 04 03 2004 1:46:
Is Atheism a absense of religious belief or a absense of God belief? Given
that studies have shown that religious believers live longer and less
stressed lives than non-relgiious believers (I did a google search on this
and it seems to hold up to some scrutiny) wouldn't it be a advantage for
most atheists to have some kind of meditation/relaxation practice in their
lives. Apparently atheists have a higher IQ on average than religious types
(I did a google search on this too!!!) I wonder why this increased
intelligence isn't linked to increased lifespan? I'm talking group
statistics here not individual variations...
Kevin:
Find a copy of the Diamond Sutra, the oldest extant printed book (a good bit
older than Gutenberg's Bible). Just read the intro, and you can see that in
Buddhism, there are many gods. Demons too.
Modern-day Buddhism doesn't much concern itself with the gods. It's much
more about how to live.
Then again, find an uncorrupted version of the Old Testament. It begins like
this: "In the beginning, the Mighty Ones created Heaven and Earth."
When the OT was translated into Greek, the folks who did it tried to remove
the references to many gods and leave the impression that there is but one.
Still, you can find quite a number of places in a modern Bible where there
are still references to many gods, as in the first of the ten commandments.
From my experience, most Buddhists speak as if there were only one god.
I think you're making an erroneous assumption here. First, while the
Diamond sutra does talk of supernatural beings (deva, asura, etc)
they're not really "gods" in the sense that we think of them (i.e.
divine creators of the universe) In that set of beliefs, there are six
different levels of beings (from "best" to "worst" deva, asura, human,
animal, hungry spirit, and hell-creature) that one gets reincarnated
into based on karma from their past life. I.e. if you were good in this
life but didn't succeed in becoming a Buddha, you might be a deva in the
next life. But all the creatures on these six tiers are subject to the
same "laws of the universe." In that sense, even the so-called "gods"
are inferior to the Buddhas and Bodhisattvas that "escaped" the cycle of
reincarnation, and anything potentially can become a Buddha. (ie that
fly you squashed might have attained buddhahood and is now superior to
the "gods")
Second, the Diamond sutra is not exactly a core text of Buddhism--it's
only really important in Mahayana Buddhism--in Theraveda Buddhism and
Eastern (Zen) Buddhism it's not even really considered. There's pretty
much no teaching or core text common to all sects of Buddhism (like the
Bible is to all Christian sects for example) aside from the Four Noble
Truths, which say absolutely nothing about gods. The other teachings of
the various sects vary so wildly over the map that you can't really
pigeonhole "Buddhists" into one set of beliefs. (Some believe in gods,
some don't. Some believe you can attain by salvation through "faith,"
some believe faith will get you nowhere. Some believe in direct
reincarnation, some don't. It varies a heck of a lot.)
A note here that Mahayana, or "pure land" sect of Buddhism is probably
the "branch" of Buddhism that is closest to "theism" in the sense that
we normally think of it in the West. While they don't really have gods
that make a lick of difference per se, they're very big on
Bodhisattvas--those that attain Buddhahood but hold off on becoming full
Buddhas (since full Buddhas become completely separated from the
universe) and remain "behind" more or less as "spirits" until everyone
else successfully becomes a Buddha. Mahayana sects often stress praying
to the various Bodhisattvas, saying that Buddhahood is virtually
impossible to attain on one's own, and you need to have faith in the
Bodhisattvas to get enlightenment. Theraveda on the other hand is not
big on Bodhisattvas and gods, and more philosophically oriented. So is
Zen, which basically originated in China as a (pretty sucessful) attempt
to strip all the theistic baggage from Mahayana Buddhism, with a heavy
dose of Daoist influence to boot. Practicioners of Zen are also not very
big on gods either.
--
To reply to me via email, drop the dash in the address.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mr. Thorne" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Buddhists Atheists? |
04 Mar 2004 01:27:37 PM |
|
|
in article MPG.1ab133e78a85caeb98969f@netnews.upenn.edu, Ian at
masakado-kou@yahoo.com wrote on 04 03 2004 11:16:
In article <BC6C68A7.11B02%lyricalreckoner@yahoo.com>,
lyricalreckoner@yahoo.com
said...
in article 0WC1c.502$sq2.468@newsfe2-gui.server.ntli.net, kevin
hollingsworth at wrote on 04 03 2004 1:46:
Is Atheism a absense of religious belief or a absense of God belief? Given
that studies have shown that religious believers live longer and less
stressed lives than non-relgiious believers (I did a google search on this
and it seems to hold up to some scrutiny) wouldn't it be a advantage for
most atheists to have some kind of meditation/relaxation practice in their
lives. Apparently atheists have a higher IQ on average than religious types
(I did a google search on this too!!!) I wonder why this increased
intelligence isn't linked to increased lifespan? I'm talking group
statistics here not individual variations...
Kevin:
Find a copy of the Diamond Sutra, the oldest extant printed book (a good bit
older than Gutenberg's Bible). Just read the intro, and you can see that in
Buddhism, there are many gods. Demons too.
Modern-day Buddhism doesn't much concern itself with the gods. It's much
more about how to live.
Then again, find an uncorrupted version of the Old Testament. It begins like
this: "In the beginning, the Mighty Ones created Heaven and Earth."
When the OT was translated into Greek, the folks who did it tried to remove
the references to many gods and leave the impression that there is but one.
Still, you can find quite a number of places in a modern Bible where there
are still references to many gods, as in the first of the ten commandments.
From my experience, most Buddhists speak as if there were only one god.
I think you're making an erroneous assumption here. First, while the
Diamond sutra does talk of supernatural beings (deva, asura, etc)
they're not really "gods" in the sense that we think of them (i.e.
divine creators of the universe) In that set of beliefs, there are six
different levels of beings (from "best" to "worst" deva, asura, human,
animal, hungry spirit, and hell-creature) that one gets reincarnated
into based on karma from their past life. I.e. if you were good in this
life but didn't succeed in becoming a Buddha, you might be a deva in the
next life. But all the creatures on these six tiers are subject to the
same "laws of the universe." In that sense, even the so-called "gods"
are inferior to the Buddhas and Bodhisattvas that "escaped" the cycle of
reincarnation, and anything potentially can become a Buddha. (ie that
fly you squashed might have attained buddhahood and is now superior to
the "gods")
Second, the Diamond sutra is not exactly a core text of Buddhism--it's
only really important in Mahayana Buddhism--in Theraveda Buddhism and
Eastern (Zen) Buddhism it's not even really considered. There's pretty
much no teaching or core text common to all sects of Buddhism (like the
Bible is to all Christian sects for example) aside from the Four Noble
Truths, which say absolutely nothing about gods. The other teachings of
the various sects vary so wildly over the map that you can't really
pigeonhole "Buddhists" into one set of beliefs. (Some believe in gods,
some don't. Some believe you can attain by salvation through "faith,"
some believe faith will get you nowhere. Some believe in direct
reincarnation, some don't. It varies a heck of a lot.)
A note here that Mahayana, or "pure land" sect of Buddhism is probably
the "branch" of Buddhism that is closest to "theism" in the sense that
we normally think of it in the West. While they don't really have gods
that make a lick of difference per se, they're very big on
Bodhisattvas--those that attain Buddhahood but hold off on becoming full
Buddhas (since full Buddhas become completely separated from the
universe) and remain "behind" more or less as "spirits" until everyone
else successfully becomes a Buddha. Mahayana sects often stress praying
to the various Bodhisattvas, saying that Buddhahood is virtually
impossible to attain on one's own, and you need to have faith in the
Bodhisattvas to get enlightenment. Theraveda on the other hand is not
big on Bodhisattvas and gods, and more philosophically oriented. So is
Zen, which basically originated in China as a (pretty sucessful) attempt
to strip all the theistic baggage from Mahayana Buddhism, with a heavy
dose of Daoist influence to boot. Practicioners of Zen are also not very
big on gods either.
Much thanks for the info. I admit of great ignorance concerning Buddhism. I
imagined the Sutras were central to it.
Right before me, I have the Threefold Lotus Sutra. In the very first
paragraph, it specifically mentions the gods.
I've asked quite a number of Buddhists about what they believe, and they all
seem to have a different answer. Quite unlike the Monogod religions, it
seems to me.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ian" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Buddhists Atheists? |
04 Mar 2004 03:50:31 PM |
|
|
In article <BC6CC2FA.12E2E%>,
said...
in article MPG.1ab133e78a85caeb98969f@netnews.upenn.edu, Ian at
masakado-kou@yahoo.com wrote on 04 03 2004 11:16:
In article <BC6C68A7.11B02% >,
said...
in article 0WC1c.502$sq2.468@newsfe2-gui.server.ntli.net, kevin
hollingsworth at wrote on 04 03 2004 1:46:
Is Atheism a absense of religious belief or a absense of God belief? Given
that studies have shown that religious believers live longer and less
stressed lives than non-relgiious believers (I did a google search on this
and it seems to hold up to some scrutiny) wouldn't it be a advantage for
most atheists to have some kind of meditation/relaxation practice in their
lives. Apparently atheists have a higher IQ on average than religious types
(I did a google search on this too!!!) I wonder why this increased
intelligence isn't linked to increased lifespan? I'm talking group
statistics here not individual variations...
Kevin:
Find a copy of the Diamond Sutra, the oldest extant printed book (a good bit
older than Gutenberg's Bible). Just read the intro, and you can see that in
Buddhism, there are many gods. Demons too.
Modern-day Buddhism doesn't much concern itself with the gods. It's much
more about how to live.
Then again, find an uncorrupted version of the Old Testament. It begins like
this: "In the beginning, the Mighty Ones created Heaven and Earth."
When the OT was translated into Greek, the folks who did it tried to remove
the references to many gods and leave the impression that there is but one.
Still, you can find quite a number of places in a modern Bible where there
are still references to many gods, as in the first of the ten commandments.
From my experience, most Buddhists speak as if there were only one god.
I think you're making an erroneous assumption here. First, while the
Diamond sutra does talk of supernatural beings (deva, asura, etc)
they're not really "gods" in the sense that we think of them (i.e.
divine creators of the universe) In that set of beliefs, there are six
different levels of beings (from "best" to "worst" deva, asura, human,
animal, hungry spirit, and hell-creature) that one gets reincarnated
into based on karma from their past life. I.e. if you were good in this
life but didn't succeed in becoming a Buddha, you might be a deva in the
next life. But all the creatures on these six tiers are subject to the
same "laws of the universe." In that sense, even the so-called "gods"
are inferior to the Buddhas and Bodhisattvas that "escaped" the cycle of
reincarnation, and anything potentially can become a Buddha. (ie that
fly you squashed might have attained buddhahood and is now superior to
the "gods")
Second, the Diamond sutra is not exactly a core text of Buddhism--it's
only really important in Mahayana Buddhism--in Theraveda Buddhism and
Eastern (Zen) Buddhism it's not even really considered. There's pretty
much no teaching or core text common to all sects of Buddhism (like the
Bible is to all Christian sects for example) aside from the Four Noble
Truths, which say absolutely nothing about gods. The other teachings of
the various sects vary so wildly over the map that you can't really
pigeonhole "Buddhists" into one set of beliefs. (Some believe in gods,
some don't. Some believe you can attain by salvation through "faith,"
some believe faith will get you nowhere. Some believe in direct
reincarnation, some don't. It varies a heck of a lot.)
A note here that Mahayana, or "pure land" sect of Buddhism is probably
the "branch" of Buddhism that is closest to "theism" in the sense that
we normally think of it in the West. While they don't really have gods
that make a lick of difference per se, they're very big on
Bodhisattvas--those that attain Buddhahood but hold off on becoming full
Buddhas (since full Buddhas become completely separated from the
universe) and remain "behind" more or less as "spirits" until everyone
else successfully becomes a Buddha. Mahayana sects often stress praying
to the various Bodhisattvas, saying that Buddhahood is virtually
impossible to attain on one's own, and you need to have faith in the
Bodhisattvas to get enlightenment. Theraveda on the other hand is not
big on Bodhisattvas and gods, and more philosophically oriented. So is
Zen, which basically originated in China as a (pretty sucessful) attempt
to strip all the theistic baggage from Mahayana Buddhism, with a heavy
dose of Daoist influence to boot. Practicioners of Zen are also not very
big on gods either.
Much thanks for the info. I admit of great ignorance concerning Buddhism. I
imagined the Sutras were central to it.
You're not wrong--for a lot of sects, they are. Thing is, there are a
whole lot of different Sutras, and each sect has its own ideas about
which are important and which aren't. There are even a few (distasteful,
IMO) sutras that say things like "This is the only True Sutra and if you
believe any others you're a heretic." The Diamond Sutra and its
counterpart, the Taizo Sutra (that's the Japanese name, I dunno what the
English one is off the top of my head--probably "Womb Sutra") are big
for some, the Lotus Sutra is the big one for others, and yet others will
focus on the Sutta Pitaka, etc.
Right before me, I have the Threefold Lotus Sutra. In the very first
paragraph, it specifically mentions the gods.
Yeah, the Lotus Sutra is a real big one. Nichiren Buddhism totally
revolves around it. It's not surprising it mentions the gods though--
it's a rather old one (1st century BCE) when Buddhism was more god-
oriented than it is today and still carried a lot from its Hindu roots.
I've asked quite a number of Buddhists about what they believe, and they all
seem to have a different answer. Quite unlike the Monogod religions, it
seems to me.
It's not surprising really. Unlike the monogod religions, which tend to
have one, sole, authority figure (Moses, Jesus, Mohammed, etc) that
dictates rules from on high, you really don't have that in Buddhism.
There is "the" Buddha himself (e.g. Gautama) but there is very little
extant stuff from what he said; most Sutras come from his students and
students of his students. And most Buddhist sects hold that "the" Buddha
himself wasn't specifically divine, just an ordinary shmo who achieved
enlightenment. Just about the only thing that we have that (allegedly)
came from him are the Four Noble Truths, which are (paraphrased in my
own words :P) 1) ***** happens 2) ***** happens because things don't go
the way you want them to 3) If you stop being so bothered about things
that don't go the way you want them to, ***** won't happen and 4) By
living the right way with the right outlook, you can stop being so
bothered by things that don't go the way you want them to.
So obviously there's a whole freakish load of leeway you can go there.
Most sects' differences are on Truth #4, in saying what the exactly
right way to go about ditching your desire and nipping suffering in the
bud is. But the whole focus of the religion is different too--rather
than being about obeying some big sky-man's dictates Because He Says So,
the religion is more focused on trying to eliminate suffering on earth.
For that reason, I have a lot of respect for Buddhism, even if some of
the sects have some bizarre superstitions attached to them.
--
To reply to me via email, drop the dash in the address.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Popelish" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Buddhists Atheists? |
04 Mar 2004 08:28:05 AM |
|
|
kevin hollingsworth wrote:
Is Atheism a absense of religious belief or a absense of God belief? Given
that studies have shown that religious believers live longer and less
stressed lives than non-relgiious believers (I did a google search on this
and it seems to hold up to some scrutiny) wouldn't it be a advantage for
most atheists to have some kind of meditation/relaxation practice in their
lives. Apparently atheists have a higher IQ on average than religious types
(I did a google search on this too!!!) I wonder why this increased
intelligence isn't linked to increased lifespan? I'm talking group
statistics here not individual variations...
You may have stumbled upon the reason that nature took so long to
produce so few intelligent species. Intelligence may well be a two
edged sword.
--
John Popelish
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kadaitcha Man" |
|
| Title: Re: Are Buddhists Atheists? |
04 Mar 2004 08:33:16 AM |
|
|
kevin hollingsworth wrote:
Is Atheism a absense of religious belief or a absense of God belief?
Don't ask. The atheist idiots can't make their minds up.
Apparently atheists
have a higher IQ on average than religious types (I did a google
search on this too!!!)
Well, my 134 wasn't added into the theist scores, so I guess that
explains a lot.
--
TehGhodTrole: Trolling, for God's sake.
Your Free Insult: Jesus loves you.
.
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|