Religions > Atheism > Are not philosophers merely the confused and disaffected trying to make sense of their plight?
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"V" |
| Date: |
16 Aug 2007 09:00:32 AM |
| Object: |
Are not philosophers merely the confused and disaffected trying to make sense of their plight? |
Bill:
"We're very competent at engineering and completely inept at
philosophy. Philosophers try to construct their systems with the same
precision as a bridge or a building or a computer, and fail utterly.
The reason is that philosophers have prejudices and preferences, likes
and dislikes ideas of what -ought- to be or not be. Yet even with the
long history of abject failure at devising workable philosophies,
there is still nothing approaching consensus on how we should
understand the world. Strangely, every civilization and most cultures
depends -fundamentally- on some philosophy."
from:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/727375ca9c06ba01/1439c8289c9d6b50?hl=en#1439c8289c9d6b50
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
Sure Bill. We all suffer from imperfections to one degree or another.
But why single out philosophers Bill? The study and practice of
philosophy can provide a useful foundation of underlying inner peace.
I have always told you that humans are imperfect. I have always told
you that what is logical is not always practical when it comes to
humans...so what.
Scientists the supposed gods of logic are no better. Prejudiced and
small minded just as most other humans are.
Look at the 'clovis first' controversy for just one example. People as
well as scientists get attached to their views and cannot imagine it
any other way. Once people become entrenched they suffer from
blindness. Goes for theists as well as atheists - scientists and
philosophers alike.
See:
http://jesusneverexisted.org/jne/forum/index.php?topic=470.0
On another list, a critic that didn't like philosophers told me: "Are
not philosophers merely the confused and disaffected trying to make
sense of their plight?"
We (humans) just do the best we can with what we got...prejudices and
all.
When we want to fly like a bird we do...just not exactly like a bird
and we crash sometimes.
Same with philosophy. We do the best we can with what we got.
And being humans their are al sorts of degrees of perfection and
imperfection with our work.
But the basis of philosophy is joy, as the contemplative life finds it
joy in discovering the truth.
Huxley gives us some insight into philosophers.
"The highest object that human beings can set before themselves is not
the pursuit of any such chimera as the annihilation of the unknown: it
is simply the unwearied endeavor to remove its boundaries a little
further from our little sphere of action."
Aristotle also reminds us "It is the mark of an educated mind to rest
satisfied with the degree of precision which the nature of the subject
admits and not to seek exactness where only an approximation is
possible."
I heard a story one time in a Yoga lecture that offers some useful
advice to the perfectionist that is having trouble being a
perfectionist
"Range is of the ego - Form is of the soul."
The only thing we need to be concerned with is how is our form and
give our best efforts at discovering truth and virtue.
See:
http://jesusneverexisted.org/jne/forum/index.php?topic=627.0
In the classical sense, a philosopher is a doctor of the soul. It is
unfortunate that in modern times philosophers have moved away from
this purpose.
Here are the 5 values of virtues Socrates stood for:
Truth
Justice
Courage
Proportionality or Moderation
Wisdom
All these virtues are ephemeral in nature and not concrete like
bridges and roads Bill. And even though we humans do good work at
engineering as you mentioned Bill. We still fail miserably sometimes
and our bridges and roads collapse. Like all things human and
requiring judgments to be made - sometimes our judgments have errors
in them.
You see Bill, all our actions have consequences, and many of our
actions produce consequences that end up destroying peace. Our actions
destroy our peace as well as the inner peace of others. And if we do
not ask the hard questions, we will fail much more miserably than we
do now at living virtuous lives. And many times the best we can do is
find the 'best fit' answer to a question and sometimes this best fit
answer is the lesser of two evils.
Personally, philosophy has played a big role in yielding peace
dividends to me. But, just as water and air sustain life, water and
air also will also destroy life when in excess. So it goes with most
other things when they are out of balance...especially our thinking.
Sure some people as well as philosophers get stuck in 'Over Thinkers
Syndrome' They get stuck trying to answer the unanswerable.
Myself?
I am a Practical Philosopher, as well as a practitioner of simplicity.
Once in a while I look at the unanswerable along the way, but I try
not to get lost in it.
The real problem is not in the discussion of concepts that no human is
able to answer. We do not think in a vacuum, so thoughts 'come and go'
and who can say where they will lead? But as for 'when they go' and
'how much space' they take up in our life and in our heads...that is
our choice.
You see, the bigger problem arises when we lose ourselves in such
thought or become addicted to it as a distraction from living. And, as
all addictions do, they cause us detrimental problems in life due
excesses
"Just as water floes downhill without effort but requires outside
forces and energy to make it move uphill. So the human consciousness
falls to its lowest levels of the senses without effort and energies
to make our consciousness gravitate to more than our base desires." ~
Hindu Sage
Take care,
V (Male)
Agnostic Freethinker
Practical Philosopher
AA#2
.
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: Are not philosophers merely the confused and disaffected trying to make sense of their plight? |
16 Aug 2007 11:11:02 AM |
|
|
No.
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http//www.io.com/~dloubet
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Are not philosophers merely the confused and disaffected trying to make sense of their plight? |
16 Aug 2007 12:02:49 PM |
|
|
On 16 aug, 16:00, V <vf...@aol.com> wrote:
Bill:
"We're very competent at engineering and completely inept at
philosophy. Philosophers try to construct their systems with the same
precision as a bridge or a building or a computer, and fail utterly.
The reason is that philosophers have prejudices and preferences, likes
and dislikes ideas of what -ought- to be or not be. Yet even with the
long history of abject failure at devising workable philosophies,
there is still nothing approaching consensus on how we should
understand the world. Strangely, every civilization and most cultures
depends -fundamentally- on some philosophy."
from:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/727375ca...
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
Sure Bill. We all suffer from imperfections to one degree or another.
But why single out philosophers Bill? The study and practice of
philosophy can provide a useful foundation of underlying inner peace.
I have always told you that humans are imperfect. I have always told
you that what is logical is not always practical when it comes to
humans...so what.
Scientists the supposed gods of logic are no better. Prejudiced and
small minded just as most other humans are.
Look at the 'clovis first' controversy for just one example. People as
well as scientists get attached to their views and cannot imagine it
any other way. Once people become entrenched they suffer from
blindness. Goes for theists as well as atheists - scientists and
philosophers alike.
See:
http://jesusneverexisted.org/jne/forum/index.php?topic=470.0
On another list, a critic that didn't like philosophers told me: "Are
not philosophers merely the confused and disaffected trying to make
sense of their plight?"
We (humans) just do the best we can with what we got...prejudices and
all.
When we want to fly like a bird we do...just not exactly like a bird
and we crash sometimes.
Same with philosophy. We do the best we can with what we got.
And being humans their are al sorts of degrees of perfection and
imperfection with our work.
But the basis of philosophy is joy, as the contemplative life finds it
joy in discovering the truth.
Huxley gives us some insight into philosophers.
"The highest object that human beings can set before themselves is not
the pursuit of any such chimera as the annihilation of the unknown: it
is simply the unwearied endeavor to remove its boundaries a little
further from our little sphere of action."
Aristotle also reminds us "It is the mark of an educated mind to rest
satisfied with the degree of precision which the nature of the subject
admits and not to seek exactness where only an approximation is
possible."
I heard a story one time in a Yoga lecture that offers some useful
advice to the perfectionist that is having trouble being a
perfectionist
"Range is of the ego - Form is of the soul."
The only thing we need to be concerned with is how is our form and
give our best efforts at discovering truth and virtue.
See:
http://jesusneverexisted.org/jne/forum/index.php?topic=627.0
In the classical sense, a philosopher is a doctor of the soul. It is
unfortunate that in modern times philosophers have moved away from
this purpose.
Here are the 5 values of virtues Socrates stood for:
Truth
Justice
Courage
Proportionality or Moderation
Wisdom
All these virtues are ephemeral in nature and not concrete like
bridges and roads Bill. And even though we humans do good work at
engineering as you mentioned Bill. We still fail miserably sometimes
and our bridges and roads collapse. Like all things human and
requiring judgments to be made - sometimes our judgments have errors
in them.
You see Bill, all our actions have consequences, and many of our
actions produce consequences that end up destroying peace. Our actions
destroy our peace as well as the inner peace of others. And if we do
not ask the hard questions, we will fail much more miserably than we
do now at living virtuous lives. And many times the best we can do is
find the 'best fit' answer to a question and sometimes this best fit
answer is the lesser of two evils.
Personally, philosophy has played a big role in yielding peace
dividends to me. But, just as water and air sustain life, water and
air also will also destroy life when in excess. So it goes with most
other things when they are out of balance...especially our thinking.
Sure some people as well as philosophers get stuck in 'Over Thinkers
Syndrome' They get stuck trying to answer the unanswerable.
Myself?
I am a Practical Philosopher, as well as a practitioner of simplicity.
Once in a while I look at the unanswerable along the way, but I try
not to get lost in it.
The real problem is not in the discussion of concepts that no human is
able to answer. We do not think in a vacuum, so thoughts 'come and go'
and who can say where they will lead? But as for 'when they go' and
'how much space' they take up in our life and in our heads...that is
our choice.
You see, the bigger problem arises when we lose ourselves in such
thought or become addicted to it as a distraction from living. And, as
all addictions do, they cause us detrimental problems in life due
excesses
"Just as water floes downhill without effort but requires outside
forces and energy to make it move uphill. So the human consciousness
falls to its lowest levels of the senses without effort and energies
to make our consciousness gravitate to more than our base desires." ~
Hindu Sage
Take care,
V (Male)
Agnostic Freethinker
Practical Philosopher
AA#2
Although usually your post are much to long to allow for a
comprehensive reply, I will try to do so anyway this time.
To start with I would like to point out that workable philosophies
have been at offer. The problem is that most philosophers are not
content with pragmatism, nor are they very happy with the scientific
method. Philosophers love deductive reasoning and almost never admit
that no knowledge is possible without induction.
While the scientific method is very practical and has proven far
superior to any philosophy, fact is that scientists are also people,
and indeed many times make grave errors. People - as Dawkins points
out in "the God delusion" - make swift judgements using thumb rules,
and scientists are people to. Most will use the scientific method
doing there own work, but almost none adept it when confronted with
other scientists who show findings that seem to support a different
theory then the one they adhere to.
You should also be slow in judging you critic.
Does: "Are not philosophers merely the confused and disaffected
trying to make
sense of their plight?" mean anything else then:
"We are all confused, but philosophers - unlike others - try to use
this fact to find meaning". You should never forget that great
scientific progress has always been made when somebody managed to make
some sense out of confusion.
I think this is the best compliment philosophers have ever
received. . .
I do not - however - think a philosopher is a doctor of the soul.
First of all as souls do not exist as such. Secondary because a
philosopher is a lover of wishdom, and that should be enough. Thirdly
because we have psychiatrists and psychologist working at the diseases
of our mind. (and finding out that most of them have a physical
cause).
I do not think negatively about the 5 virtues you mention. But be
aware: They are all spiritual, and the mind - as Freud used to say -
overestimates the spiritual, We should always keep in mind that the
spiritual is nothing else but the working of a physical brain, and is
more fundamental than any idea we humans come up with.
Also it is not always necessary to ask hard questions in order to lead
a life of virtue. Having compassion can sometimes be enough.
I do however agree with you that one should not try to answer the
unanswerable. Human beings can ask foolish questions. Many questions
are in fact statements put in the form of a question. These we should
never try and answer.
(Did you put off your donkey-ears?)
The most common mistake of course is supposing that there always is an
answer.
"What is the meaning of life" (the ultimate question) Is the most
remarkable example. It would be better to restate it as: "Does life
have a meaning" But even that is to suggestive, and we should first
ask ourselves. "Can we know whether life has a meaning?" Personally I
think we can, but the answer depends on "What does meaning mean?" From
there on we might try and work our way back.
Peter van Velzen
August 2007
Amstelveen
The Netherlands
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Immortalist" |
|
| Title: Re: Are not philosophers merely the confused and disaffected trying to make sense of their plight? |
16 Aug 2007 11:35:55 PM |
|
|
On Aug 16, 7:00 am, V <vf...@aol.com> wrote:
Bill:
"We're very competent at engineering and completely inept at
philosophy. Philosophers try to construct their systems with the same
precision as a bridge or a building or a computer, and fail utterly.
The reason is that philosophers have prejudices and preferences, likes
and dislikes ideas of what -ought- to be or not be. Yet even with the
long history of abject failure at devising workable philosophies,
there is still nothing approaching consensus on how we should
understand the world. Strangely, every civilization and most cultures
depends -fundamentally- on some philosophy."
Actually most philosophers become lawyers and politicians, and they
try and make sence of your plight. Lest you have a definition of
philosopher that differs with the most frequent outcome of being a
philosopher.
.
|
|
|
| User: "veritas" |
|
| Title: Re: Are not philosophers merely the confused and disaffected trying to make sense of their plight? |
18 Aug 2007 04:44:08 PM |
|
|
On Aug 16, 11:35 pm, Immortalist <reanimater_2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Aug 16, 7:00 am, V <vf...@aol.com> wrote:
Bill:
"We're very competent at engineering and completely inept at
philosophy. Philosophers try to construct their systems with the same
precision as a bridge or a building or a computer, and fail utterly.
The reason is that philosophers have prejudices and preferences, likes
and dislikes ideas of what -ought- to be or not be. Yet even with the
long history of abject failure at devising workable philosophies,
there is still nothing approaching consensus on how we should
understand the world. Strangely, every civilization and most cultures
depends -fundamentally- on some philosophy."
Actually most philosophers become lawyers and politicians, and they
try and make sence of your plight. Lest you have a definition of
philosopher that differs with the most frequent outcome of being a
philosopher.
Philosphers rule the world, it's just they rule a hundred or so years
after they are dead. All Philosphy proves is that we can talk
ourselves into anything we want to think. Socrates taught basically
the same things as Jesus, Jesus taught the basic themes of the Buddha,
and so on. The rest is simply talking yourself into a certain
postition. Most talk in circles, the morals have always been very
simple: Everything in moderation. See how I talked myself into a
certain postition? Most philosophies have flaws. "Everything is
moderation" is the basis for all workable philosophies. Alcohol being
the exception of course. God forbid moderation there. Philosophies
simply go in circles proving nothing other than we can talk ourselves
into anything. There, I talked myself into it. Ken
.
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
God, Did You Not Hear Their Screams? Why are atheists are slaves?(For without their dream world of hatred...life for them would not be tolerable.) True Christian Fundamentalists do not Impose their Beliefs Child Protective Services, Corrupt, say it's not so! : twenty-one(21) judges have quit the bench in three targeted states (apparently inan attempt to save their pensions). Further, seven directors of state childprotective services agencies have st (Rev 1.1 Not suitable for AP journalists) {HRI 20050803-V3.4.1} Murderers are always lying about their "motives" - stop believing and parrotting them, start FACING them - The Motive Of Terrorism etc., Is NOT Political, NOT Ethnic, NOT Religious, NOT Re: RRR Cultists not only can't *present* FACTS to support their stance... but don't seem to realize that they don't EXIST! Re: Muslim women must read the life story of prophet Muhammad and they will understand why they have no human rights and are treated like dogs by their Muslim men who want to believe that the prophet was not a Satanic prophet possessed by Satan. AMERICANS are naturally lazy and vicious, melancholic, cowardly, and in general a lying, shiftless, people. Their marriages are not a sacrament but a sacrilege. They are idolatrous, libidinous, and commit sodomy. Their chief desire is to eat, drink,
| Their Science Does Not Even Get Close To Yours O Lord #VoteVets Spokesman Admits Their Attack Is Not About What Rush Said Anonymous Couple Wants $50,000 For Not Aborting Their Baby Re: LIBERALS PROVE THAT THEY ARE INSANE IDIOTS ==> The Insanity of the INTERNET "SEX-OFFNEDER" LISTS...Man considers himself a hero for murdering total strangers... they did their time even if they were not guilty Conservatives Do Not Need Darwin To Make Their Case think we all know who was responsible for that, the Godless liberals who cannot stand having their immorality shoved back in their ugly face!! The defenders of free thought, the Big Bang theory and evolution, are not only striking out at me, but at a Since they live among us, we dare not tolerate their conduct!
|
|
|