| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"JTEM" |
| Date: |
16 Mar 2007 06:38:43 PM |
| Object: |
Are these neo-cons insane? |
"Fred," and many others with him, are claiming that Carol
Lam was targeted for removal long before her firing
constituted "Obstruction of Justice."
Total *****.
I did the google thing and found the relevant documents:
http://judiciary.house.gov/media/pdfs/DOJdocsPt1070313.pdf
Date: January 9, 2006 (NOT "before" the Cunnignham probe)
Quote:
"Harriet, you have asked whether President Bush should remove
and replace U.S. Attorneys whose four-year terms have expired."
Clear -- undeniably -- the Bush administration wanted her to STOP
investigating crimes related to the Cunningham case, insisting that
she concentrate om immigration... even though they themselves
question where the resources to tackle immigration are going to
come from.
.
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Are these neo-cons insane? |
29 Mar 2007 10:17:42 PM |
|
|
On 16 Mar 2007 16:38:43 -0700, "JTEM" <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote in
alt.atheism
They're not that sane.
"Fred," and many others with him, are claiming that Carol
Lam was targeted for removal long before her firing
constituted "Obstruction of Justice."
Total *****.
I did the google thing and found the relevant documents:
http://judiciary.house.gov/media/pdfs/DOJdocsPt1070313.pdf
Date: January 9, 2006 (NOT "before" the Cunnignham probe)
Quote:
"Harriet, you have asked whether President Bush should remove
and replace U.S. Attorneys whose four-year terms have expired."
Clear -- undeniably -- the Bush administration wanted her to STOP
investigating crimes related to the Cunningham case, insisting that
she concentrate om immigration... even though they themselves
question where the resources to tackle immigration are going to
come from.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
