Arsenic forces closing of park



 Religions > Atheism > Arsenic forces closing of park

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "stoney"
Date: 21 Apr 2007 05:58:14 PM
Object: Arsenic forces closing of park
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/baltimore_city/bal-te.md.ci.arsenic20apr20,0,5283439.story?coll=bal-home-headlines
Arsenic forces closing of park
Tests show high levels in soil; city locks gates of Swann Park
By Tom Pelton
sun reporter
Originally published April 20, 2007
Baltimore officials closed a city park yesterday that is used regularly
by children's sports teams, after tests showed arsenic levels more than
100 times higher than is considered safe.
The city Health Department locked the gates of Swann Park, south of
Federal Hill, and passed out fliers warning neighbors of the risks of
arsenic, a cancer-causing agent.
"We are well past the threshold of being concerned, and that's why we
are shutting the park," said Dr. Joshua Sharfstein, the city health
commissioner. "But it's too soon to assess the risk to human health."
Swann Park sits next to an industrial site in South Baltimore where the
former Allied Chemical Corp. used arsenic to manufacture pesticides
until 1976.
For decades, the park on the Middle Branch of the Patapsco River has
been used by Southern High School - now Digital Harbor - football and
baseball teams, as well as local sports leagues. It is legendary as a
place where baseball stars Al Kaline and Reggie Jackson once played as
youths.
The park was closed in 1976 when a pesticide called kepone, a
nerve-damaging agent once manufactured by Allied, was found in the dirt
of the ballfields.
But a panel of federal, state and local health officials allowed the
park to be reopened that year - even though tests by the company showed
high levels of arsenic there, according to reports obtained by The Sun.
The results of the tests were unknown to residents.
Yesterday's closure was prompted after Honeywell International Inc.
turned over records to the state on April 3. In 1999, Honeywell merged
with the chemical company's successor, Allied-Signal.
The New Jersey-based Honeywell was reviewing its files as it negotiated
with Maryland over a cleanup plan for a neighboring factory site. The
records showed that Allied officials knew about elevated arsenic levels
in the park for more than 30 years, records show.
Neighbors said yesterday that they were startled to hear that the
popular waterfront fields were contaminated, and some said they were
frustrated to hear that the problems were ignored for years.
"It's a little unnerving to learn that my next-door neighbor is a field
of arsenic," said Catherine Dubravo, 21, who moved Wednesday from Little
Rock, Ark., to the street leading to the park. "It just raises so many
more questions. ... If they've known it was an area that once had
trouble, why would they ignore it?"
Cory Leichling, 12, said he plays on Swann Park's fields almost every
weekend, often for four and five hours at a time.
"Every week, we're always doing something. Football or baseball," said
Cory, who grew up next to the park. He said the tackle football games
sometimes get rough and dirt from the park gets into his cuts.
"I've had scratches, blood, and dirt has been all up in my sores. I'll
show you my arm," he said, pulling up a sleeve to show a cluster of
white scars.
Cory's father, Harvey Leichling Jr., 46, a 15-year resident of the
block, said he plans to take Cory and his 16-year-old brother to the
doctor for tests.
Baltimore's Health Department has asked an agency of the U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services to examine the site and determine whether
the health of neighbors and others who use the park is at risk,
Sharfstein said.
Arsenic is a naturally occurring element that is poisonous when consumed
in high doses, and in lesser amounts it can cause cancer, abnormal heart
rhythms and lower IQ scores in children with prolonged exposure,
according to the federal health agency.
Arsenic in dirt is less dangerous, said Dr. Laura Herrera, chief medical
officer for the city Health Department.
"The risk is very, very low ... for someone playing ball in the park,
unless they were actually eating dirt," she said.
More than a decade ago, Allied placed an asphalt cap over the site of
the former pesticide factory on Race Street, which is just north of the
park and under Interstate 95. But the cap cracked and pollutants might
have leaked, according to the Maryland Department of the Environment.
Although the state agency in recent years has been after the company to
fix the cap and test the industrial site, nobody has tested the adjacent
park since 1976, said Horacio Tablada, director of waste management for
the Maryland Department of the Environment.
Tablada said the state assumed that the park was safe because a panel of
experts called the Kepone Task Force, led by Donald H. Noren, former
director of the state health department, said that it was in 1976.
"The task force decided the park was good to go, and nobody else thought
to test it," Tablada said. "Nobody ever thought about the park having a
problem until this recent data came out ... so we decided to act
expeditiously."
Tests performed by Honeywell and turned over to the state April 19 show
arsenic levels in the park of 23 parts per million to 2,200 parts per
million, records show.
That is significantly higher than the 2 ppm to 4 ppm that experts
consider a level of possible concern for homes or playgrounds, Tablada
said. It is also higher than the 20 ppm that environmental officials
often require as a standard for cleanup of industrial sites, he said.
"These were extremely high levels that are of great concern to us,"
Tablada said.
The state agency will require Honeywell to pay for cleanup of the park
and the factory site, Tablada said. Researchers will test for
contaminants in the Middle Branch of the Patapsco River, which is
immediately west.
Victoria Streitfeld, a spokeswoman for Honeywell, said the testing at
the park in the 1970s and the capping of the factory site were deemed
adequate according to the standards of the time.
"In 1976, remediation activities directed and overseen by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, the Maryland Department of the
Environment, the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, and
Baltimore's Department of Health were undertaken at Swann Park,"
Streitfeld said. "The remediation work was consistent with best
practices and existing science at the time."
Honeywell recently has been discussing a new factory site cleanup
agreement with the state environmental agency.
The agreement should make the company replace the asphalt cap over the
former factory site, Tablada said. Rain pouring off I-95 damaged the cap
and caused leaks, he said.
"The cap wasn't working, and everything was cracked," Tablada said. "So
we ordered them to fix the cap."
During the company's review of documents as part of the recent
discussion over this consent order, Honeywell found records showing high
arsenic levels in the park dating to the 1970s, Tablada said.
A Johns Hopkins University public health study in 1976 found that men
living within a half-mile of the Allied pesticide plant died of lung
cancer at a rate four times that of men in similar urban areas.
The doctor who led the study, Dr. Genevieve Matanoski, said in news
reports then that she could not pinpoint arsenic as the cause of the
cancer, but the high death rates suggested "an exhaustive inquiry into
arsenic hazards needs to be done," according to a 1976 article in The
Sun.
An assessment of the risk may finally be conducted more than 30 years
later, according to the city Health Department.
tom.pelton@baltsun.com
Sun reporter Rona Marech contributed to this article.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.

User: "Michael Gray"

Title: Re: Arsenic forces closing of park 21 Apr 2007 07:38:05 PM
Not content to make faulty cluster bombs that are responsible for many
vicious maimings of kiddies around the globe, Honeywell now admit to
negligence with their own children!
--
.

User: "Pangur Ban"

Title: Re: Arsenic forces closing of park 21 Apr 2007 09:04:20 PM
stoney used his keyboard to write :

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/baltimore_city/bal-te.md.ci.arsenic20apr20,0,5283439.story?coll=bal-home-headlines
Arsenic forces closing of park
Tests show high levels in soil; city locks gates of Swann Park
By Tom Pelton
sun reporter
Originally published April 20, 2007
Baltimore officials closed a city park yesterday that is used regularly
by children's sports teams, after tests showed arsenic levels more than
100 times higher than is considered safe.
The city Health Department locked the gates of Swann Park, south of
Federal Hill, and passed out fliers warning neighbors of the risks of
arsenic, a cancer-causing agent.
"We are well past the threshold of being concerned, and that's why we
are shutting the park," said Dr. Joshua Sharfstein, the city health
commissioner. "But it's too soon to assess the risk to human health."
Swann Park sits next to an industrial site in South Baltimore where the
former Allied Chemical Corp. used arsenic to manufacture pesticides
until 1976.
For decades, the park on the Middle Branch of the Patapsco River has
been used by Southern High School - now Digital Harbor - football and
baseball teams, as well as local sports leagues. It is legendary as a
place where baseball stars Al Kaline and Reggie Jackson once played as
youths.
The park was closed in 1976 when a pesticide called kepone, a
nerve-damaging agent once manufactured by Allied, was found in the dirt
of the ballfields.
But a panel of federal, state and local health officials allowed the
park to be reopened that year - even though tests by the company showed
high levels of arsenic there, according to reports obtained by The Sun.
The results of the tests were unknown to residents.
Yesterday's closure was prompted after Honeywell International Inc.
turned over records to the state on April 3. In 1999, Honeywell merged
with the chemical company's successor, Allied-Signal.
The New Jersey-based Honeywell was reviewing its files as it negotiated
with Maryland over a cleanup plan for a neighboring factory site. The
records showed that Allied officials knew about elevated arsenic levels
in the park for more than 30 years, records show.
Neighbors said yesterday that they were startled to hear that the
popular waterfront fields were contaminated, and some said they were
frustrated to hear that the problems were ignored for years.
"It's a little unnerving to learn that my next-door neighbor is a field
of arsenic," said Catherine Dubravo, 21, who moved Wednesday from Little
Rock, Ark., to the street leading to the park. "It just raises so many
more questions. ... If they've known it was an area that once had
trouble, why would they ignore it?"
Cory Leichling, 12, said he plays on Swann Park's fields almost every
weekend, often for four and five hours at a time.
"Every week, we're always doing something. Football or baseball," said
Cory, who grew up next to the park. He said the tackle football games
sometimes get rough and dirt from the park gets into his cuts.
"I've had scratches, blood, and dirt has been all up in my sores. I'll
show you my arm," he said, pulling up a sleeve to show a cluster of
white scars.
Cory's father, Harvey Leichling Jr., 46, a 15-year resident of the
block, said he plans to take Cory and his 16-year-old brother to the
doctor for tests.
Baltimore's Health Department has asked an agency of the U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services to examine the site and determine whether
the health of neighbors and others who use the park is at risk,
Sharfstein said.
Arsenic is a naturally occurring element that is poisonous when consumed
in high doses, and in lesser amounts it can cause cancer, abnormal heart
rhythms and lower IQ scores in children with prolonged exposure,
according to the federal health agency.
Arsenic in dirt is less dangerous, said Dr. Laura Herrera, chief medical
officer for the city Health Department.
"The risk is very, very low ... for someone playing ball in the park,
unless they were actually eating dirt," she said.
More than a decade ago, Allied placed an asphalt cap over the site of
the former pesticide factory on Race Street, which is just north of the
park and under Interstate 95. But the cap cracked and pollutants might
have leaked, according to the Maryland Department of the Environment.
Although the state agency in recent years has been after the company to
fix the cap and test the industrial site, nobody has tested the adjacent
park since 1976, said Horacio Tablada, director of waste management for
the Maryland Department of the Environment.
Tablada said the state assumed that the park was safe because a panel of
experts called the Kepone Task Force, led by Donald H. Noren, former
director of the state health department, said that it was in 1976.
"The task force decided the park was good to go, and nobody else thought
to test it," Tablada said. "Nobody ever thought about the park having a
problem until this recent data came out ... so we decided to act
expeditiously."
Tests performed by Honeywell and turned over to the state April 19 show
arsenic levels in the park of 23 parts per million to 2,200 parts per
million, records show.
That is significantly higher than the 2 ppm to 4 ppm that experts
consider a level of possible concern for homes or playgrounds, Tablada
said. It is also higher than the 20 ppm that environmental officials
often require as a standard for cleanup of industrial sites, he said.
"These were extremely high levels that are of great concern to us,"
Tablada said.
The state agency will require Honeywell to pay for cleanup of the park
and the factory site, Tablada said. Researchers will test for
contaminants in the Middle Branch of the Patapsco River, which is
immediately west.
Victoria Streitfeld, a spokeswoman for Honeywell, said the testing at
the park in the 1970s and the capping of the factory site were deemed
adequate according to the standards of the time.
"In 1976, remediation activities directed and overseen by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, the Maryland Department of the
Environment, the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, and
Baltimore's Department of Health were undertaken at Swann Park,"
Streitfeld said. "The remediation work was consistent with best
practices and existing science at the time."
Honeywell recently has been discussing a new factory site cleanup
agreement with the state environmental agency.
The agreement should make the company replace the asphalt cap over the
former factory site, Tablada said. Rain pouring off I-95 damaged the cap
and caused leaks, he said.
"The cap wasn't working, and everything was cracked," Tablada said. "So
we ordered them to fix the cap."
During the company's review of documents as part of the recent
discussion over this consent order, Honeywell found records showing high
arsenic levels in the park dating to the 1970s, Tablada said.
A Johns Hopkins University public health study in 1976 found that men
living within a half-mile of the Allied pesticide plant died of lung
cancer at a rate four times that of men in similar urban areas.
The doctor who led the study, Dr. Genevieve Matanoski, said in news
reports then that she could not pinpoint arsenic as the cause of the
cancer, but the high death rates suggested "an exhaustive inquiry into
arsenic hazards needs to be done," according to a 1976 article in The
Sun.
An assessment of the risk may finally be conducted more than 30 years
later, according to the city Health Department.
tom.pelton@baltsun.com
Sun reporter Rona Marech contributed to this article.

"Earth Matters" Focuses on Minerals in New Mexico's Drinking Water
by Mary Franklin
SOCORRO, N.M., September 3, 2002 -- The New Mexico Bureau of Geology
and Mineral Resources (NMBGMR) recently published the summer issue of
its free newsletter New Mexico EARTH MATTERS. The focus of this issue
is arsenic in New Mexico's drinking water.
"Arsenic is a naturally occurring element found in many of the rocks
and minerals that make up the Earth's crust," the article states. In
New Mexico, one of the most common rocks containing arsenic is pyrite
or "fool's gold." Also, silica-rich volcanic rocks in the Jemez
Mountains and some sandstones and mudstones that underlie the
Albuquerque area contain high amounts of arsenic. Rocks that contain
arsenic can contribute the element to surface and ground water.
The arsenic content of the Rio Grande varies with geographic location.
In the Rio Grande near the San Felipe Pueblo, the water contains about
two parts per billion (ppb) arsenic, but by the time the river reaches
the Isleta Pueblo, the arsenic concentration has reached four ppb.
Arsenic in ground water is a more common problem in New Mexico.
Nationwide, 5.5 percent of municipalities would have to treat drinking
water to meet new EPA arsenic-in-drinking water standard of 10 ppb. In
New Mexico that number is closer to 20 percent, and 93 percent of these
municipalities are small communities that cannot afford the cost
associated with meeting these new standards. For the average New
Mexican, meeting these standards could increase the cost of water by
$50-$90 per month.
http://www.nmt.edu/mainpage/news/2002/4sept02.html
A friend cannot use her well water for drinking; she has to buy water
in large jugs every few weeks. I have seen poor folks with milk jugs
getting water from village taps which are unguarded or unlocked.
I have a small home-built still in the backyard to get "pure" water in
small quantities; I use it for an indoor fountain I don't want to have
marred by lime deposits - among other small uses. My water (so far)
isn't bad enough to require a larger still or purchase of distilled
water.
Pang - carrying on a family tradition of maintaining a still lol
--
Aut viam inveniam aut faciam.
.
User: "Michael Gray"

Title: Re: Arsenic forces closing of park 21 Apr 2007 10:14:31 PM
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 20:04:20 -0600, Pangur Ban <Whistleblower@att.net>
wrote:
- Refer: <mn.acb47d74d6384f98.73271@att.net>
:

Arsenic in ground water is a more common problem in New Mexico.
Nationwide, 5.5 percent of municipalities would have to treat drinking
water to meet new EPA arsenic-in-drinking water standard of 10 ppb. In
New Mexico that number is closer to 20 percent, and 93 percent of these
municipalities are small communities that cannot afford the cost
associated with meeting these new standards. For the average New
Mexican, meeting these standards could increase the cost of water by
$50-$90 per month.

http://www.nmt.edu/mainpage/news/2002/4sept02.html

A friend cannot use her well water for drinking; she has to buy water
in large jugs every few weeks. I have seen poor folks with milk jugs
getting water from village taps which are unguarded or unlocked.

I have a small home-built still in the backyard to get "pure" water in
small quantities; I use it for an indoor fountain I don't want to have
marred by lime deposits - among other small uses. My water (so far)
isn't bad enough to require a larger still or purchase of distilled
water.

Pang - carrying on a family tradition of maintaining a still lol

That sure beats the poor villagers in Bangladesh, who have no choice
but to drink their arsenic soaked water (provided by wells sunk by
western charities UNICEF most prominent amongst them!), and put up
with the disfiguring effects, (which eventually include getting dirt
shovelled in your face).
http://www.unesco.org/courier/2001_01/uk/planet.htm
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/06/0605_030605_arsenicwater.html
http://www.sos-arsenic.net/
--
.
User: "Pangur Ban"

Title: Re: Arsenic forces closing of park 21 Apr 2007 11:07:08 PM
Michael Gray expressed precisely :

On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 20:04:20 -0600, Pangur Ban <Whistleblower@att.net>
wrote:
- Refer: <mn.acb47d74d6384f98.73271@att.net>


Arsenic in ground water is a more common problem in New Mexico.
Nationwide, 5.5 percent of municipalities would have to treat drinking
water to meet new EPA arsenic-in-drinking water standard of 10 ppb. In
New Mexico that number is closer to 20 percent, and 93 percent of these
municipalities are small communities that cannot afford the cost
associated with meeting these new standards. For the average New
Mexican, meeting these standards could increase the cost of water by
$50-$90 per month.

http://www.nmt.edu/mainpage/news/2002/4sept02.html

A friend cannot use her well water for drinking; she has to buy water
in large jugs every few weeks. I have seen poor folks with milk jugs
getting water from village taps which are unguarded or unlocked.

I have a small home-built still in the backyard to get "pure" water in
small quantities; I use it for an indoor fountain I don't want to have
marred by lime deposits - among other small uses. My water (so far)
isn't bad enough to require a larger still or purchase of distilled
water.

Pang - carrying on a family tradition of maintaining a still lol

That sure beats the poor villagers in Bangladesh, who have no choice
but to drink their arsenic soaked water (provided by wells sunk by
western charities UNICEF most prominent amongst them!), and put up
with the disfiguring effects, (which eventually include getting dirt
shovelled in your face).
http://www.unesco.org/courier/2001_01/uk/planet.htm
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/06/0605_030605_arsenicwater.html
http://www.sos-arsenic.net/

How absolutely horrible!!! :'(
Pang - who is also wondering if you offended by the scatological reply
I made to one of your posts? I trust not. :-)
--
De inimico non loquaris sed cogites.
.
User: "Michael Gray"

Title: Re: Arsenic forces closing of park 21 Apr 2007 11:56:27 PM
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:07:08 -0600, Pangur Ban <Whistleblower@att.net>
wrote:
- Refer: <mn.ad2f7d747e5221e1.73271@att.net>

Michael Gray expressed precisely :

On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 20:04:20 -0600, Pangur Ban <Whistleblower@att.net>
wrote:
- Refer: <mn.acb47d74d6384f98.73271@att.net>




Arsenic in ground water is a more common problem in New Mexico.
Nationwide, 5.5 percent of municipalities would have to treat drinking
water to meet new EPA arsenic-in-drinking water standard of 10 ppb. In
New Mexico that number is closer to 20 percent, and 93 percent of these
municipalities are small communities that cannot afford the cost
associated with meeting these new standards. For the average New
Mexican, meeting these standards could increase the cost of water by
$50-$90 per month.

http://www.nmt.edu/mainpage/news/2002/4sept02.html

A friend cannot use her well water for drinking; she has to buy water
in large jugs every few weeks. I have seen poor folks with milk jugs
getting water from village taps which are unguarded or unlocked.

I have a small home-built still in the backyard to get "pure" water in
small quantities; I use it for an indoor fountain I don't want to have
marred by lime deposits - among other small uses. My water (so far)
isn't bad enough to require a larger still or purchase of distilled
water.

Pang - carrying on a family tradition of maintaining a still lol


That sure beats the poor villagers in Bangladesh, who have no choice
but to drink their arsenic soaked water (provided by wells sunk by
western charities UNICEF most prominent amongst them!), and put up
with the disfiguring effects, (which eventually include getting dirt
shovelled in your face).


http://www.unesco.org/courier/2001_01/uk/planet.htm
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/06/0605_030605_arsenicwater.html


http://www.sos-arsenic.net/


How absolutely horrible!!! :'(

Quite.
A living hell, brought to you by UNICEF.
What was that which has been said about the paving material on the
path to Hell?
(How's that for past-tense-preposition-packing? Think I'm ready for
the Olympix? Go Team!)

Pang - who is also wondering if you offended by the scatological reply
I made to one of your posts? I trust not. :-)

It takes a LOT more than that to offend me!!
(I'm Australian, after all.) :)
Seriously though, about the only things I am actually offended by are:
* Child abuse.
* Michael Jackson.
* Cruelty to animals.
* Deception in shape or form, especially perfidious 'psychics'.
* Lying.
* Those silly dolls in dresses that trailer-trash idiots put over
their spare toilet rolls to "add a touch of class" to the dunny.
* Behavour resulting from willfully acquired ignorance. (Hullo duke!)
* Shirley McLane.
Scatology, cacophony, and even Craponomics, just do not hold a candle
to that lot!
(O.T.: Can I borrow yer still, Granny Clampett? I got me some
moonshine that needs a little bit of "finishing school", if'n ya knows
what I mean!)
--
.
User: "Pangur Ban"

Title: Re: Arsenic forces closing of park 23 Apr 2007 09:34:12 AM
Michael Gray explained :

On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:07:08 -0600, Pangur Ban <Whistleblower@att.net>
wrote:
- Refer: <mn.ad2f7d747e5221e1.73271@att.net>

Michael Gray expressed precisely :

On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 20:04:20 -0600, Pangur Ban <Whistleblower@att.net>
wrote:
- Refer: <mn.acb47d74d6384f98.73271@att.net>



Arsenic in ground water is a more common problem in New Mexico.
Nationwide, 5.5 percent of municipalities would have to treat drinking
water to meet new EPA arsenic-in-drinking water standard of 10 ppb. In
New Mexico that number is closer to 20 percent, and 93 percent of these
municipalities are small communities that cannot afford the cost
associated with meeting these new standards. For the average New
Mexican, meeting these standards could increase the cost of water by
$50-$90 per month.

http://www.nmt.edu/mainpage/news/2002/4sept02.html

A friend cannot use her well water for drinking; she has to buy water
in large jugs every few weeks. I have seen poor folks with milk jugs
getting water from village taps which are unguarded or unlocked.

I have a small home-built still in the backyard to get "pure" water in
small quantities; I use it for an indoor fountain I don't want to have
marred by lime deposits - among other small uses. My water (so far)
isn't bad enough to require a larger still or purchase of distilled
water.

Pang - carrying on a family tradition of maintaining a still lol

That sure beats the poor villagers in Bangladesh, who have no choice
but to drink their arsenic soaked water (provided by wells sunk by
western charities UNICEF most prominent amongst them!), and put up
with the disfiguring effects, (which eventually include getting dirt
shovelled in your face).


http://www.unesco.org/courier/2001_01/uk/planet.htm
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/06/0605_030605_arsenicwater.html
http://www.sos-arsenic.net/


How absolutely horrible!!! :'(

Quite.
A living hell, brought to you by UNICEF.
What was that which has been said about the paving material on the
path to Hell?
(How's that for past-tense-preposition-packing? Think I'm ready for
the Olympix? Go Team!)

You almost had an OAT! You could have gone for a ROT.... easier.

Pang - who is also wondering if you offended by the scatological reply I
made to one of your posts? I trust not. :-)

It takes a LOT more than that to offend me!! (I'm Australian, after all.)
:)
Seriously though, about the only things I am actually offended by are:
* Child abuse.
* Michael Jackson.
* Cruelty to animals.
* Deception in shape or form, especially perfidious 'psychics'.
* Lying.
* Those silly dolls in dresses that trailer-trash idiots put over
their spare toilet rolls to "add a touch of class" to the dunny.

ROFL! They were often donated to the Shelter.

* Behavour resulting from willfully acquired ignorance. (Hullo duke!)
* Shirley McLane.

A good list... and nothing on it with which I would argue ... I would
add that I am deeply offended by those who automatically assume I share
their bigotry, homophobia, religious idiocies, and/or downright
stupidity.

Scatology, cacophony, and even Craponomics, just do not hold a candle
to that lot!

Alarming, isn't it.

Especially when they fly planes into buildings, or invent ***** in
order to invade other countries.

Hrmmmm .... who has the patent on *****? Bet she is rich - "she"
because men are very good at creating *****, but not at cleaning it up!
Pang - indulging in a bit of rare scatological "humor" and now scatting
- but without leaving scat behind.

(O.T.: Can I borrow yer still, Granny Clampett? I got me some
moonshine that needs a little bit of "finishing school", if'n ya knows
what I mean!)

LOL You shorely can!
--
De inimico non loquaris sed cogites.
.






  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER