| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"stoney" |
| Date: |
30 Mar 2007 11:39:35 AM |
| Object: |
Artist’s chocolate Jesus angers Catholics |
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11669242?GT1=9145
Artist’s chocolate Jesus angers Catholics
NYC gallery inundated with angry calls ahead of display during Holy Week
Updated: 9:34 a.m. ET March 30, 2007
NEW YORK - {AP} The Easter season unveiling of an anatomically correct
chocolate sculpture of Jesus Christ, dubbed “My Sweet Lord” by its
creator, has infuriated Catholics preparing to observe some of their
holiest days of the year.
The 6-foot sculpture by Cosimo Cavallaro was to debut Monday evening,
four days before Christians mark the crucifixion of Jesus Christ on Good
Friday. The final day of the exhibit at the Lab Gallery inside
Manhattan’s Roger Smith Hotel was planned for Easter Sunday.
“This is one of the worst assaults on Christian sensibilities ever,”
said Bill Donohue, head of the Catholic League, a watchdog group. “It’s
not just the ugliness of the portrayal, but the timing — to choose Holy
Week is astounding.”
[Oxymoron "Christian Sensibilities"]
The gallery’s creative director, Matt Semler, said the Lab and the hotel
were overrun with angry telephone calls and e-mails. The gallery was
considering its options, he said.
“We’re obviously surprised by the overwhelming response and offense
people have taken,” said Semler, adding that the Holy Week timing was a
coincidence.
The artwork was created from more than 200 pounds of milk chocolate, and
it features Christ with his arms outstretched. The Cavallaro creation
does not include a loincloth
A publicist for the gallery said the artist was not available for
comment.
Cavallaro, who was raised in Canada and Italy, is best known for his
quirky work with food as art: Past efforts include repainting a
Manhattan hotel room in melted mozzarella, spraying 5 tons of pepper
jack cheese on a Wyoming home and festooning a four-poster bed with 312
pounds of processed ham.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
| User: "Andrew Haley" |
|
| Title: Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Artist=92s?= chocolate Jesus angers Catholics |
31 Mar 2007 05:58:00 AM |
|
|
Here's how The Guardian sees it:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,2046930,00.html
"The overwhelming force of the religious right was demonstrated
yesterday when an exhibition by an international artist to be held in
mid-town Manhattan was cancelled after a campaign was launched against
it on the ground that it was disrespectful towards Christianity.
"My Sweet Lord, a 6ft representation of Jesus, was to have been
unveiled over holy week in a gallery on Lexington Avenue but was
withdrawn under fire from the Catholic League...
"That the work of an internationally renowned artist can be pulled
from a gallery in Manhattan - arguably the most liberal city in the US
- is an indication of the power that organised religion wields within
the country."
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Artist’s chocolate Jesus angers Catholics |
21 Apr 2007 06:15:28 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 10:58:00 -0000, Andrew Haley
<andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> wrote in alt.atheism
Here's how The Guardian sees it:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,2046930,00.html
"The overwhelming force of the religious right was demonstrated
yesterday when an exhibition by an international artist to be held in
mid-town Manhattan was cancelled after a campaign was launched against
it on the ground that it was disrespectful towards Christianity.
"My Sweet Lord, a 6ft representation of Jesus, was to have been
unveiled over holy week in a gallery on Lexington Avenue but was
withdrawn under fire from the Catholic League...
"That the work of an internationally renowned artist can be pulled
from a gallery in Manhattan - arguably the most liberal city in the US
- is an indication of the power that organised religion wields within
the country."
Organized religion is a crime against humanity.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Artist’s chocolate Jesus angers Catholics |
31 Mar 2007 02:11:49 AM |
|
|
In article <45fq031pifr5q904c6f8aq2ogsgtra7pvp@4ax.com>,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11669242?GT1=9145
Artist’s chocolate Jesus angers Catholics
NYC gallery inundated with angry calls ahead of display during Holy Week
Updated: 9:34 a.m. ET March 30, 2007
NEW YORK - {AP} The Easter season unveiling of an anatomically correct
chocolate sculpture of Jesus Christ, dubbed “My Sweet Lord” by its
creator, has infuriated Catholics preparing to observe some of their
holiest days of the year.
The 6-foot sculpture by Cosimo Cavallaro was to debut Monday evening,
four days before Christians mark the crucifixion of Jesus Christ on Good
Friday. The final day of the exhibit at the Lab Gallery inside
Manhattan’s Roger Smith Hotel was planned for Easter Sunday.
“This is one of the worst assaults on Christian sensibilities ever,”
said Bill Donohue, head of the Catholic League, a watchdog group. “It’s
not just the ugliness of the portrayal, but the timing — to choose Holy
Week is astounding.”
[Oxymoron "Christian Sensibilities"]
The gallery’s creative director, Matt Semler, said the Lab and the hotel
were overrun with angry telephone calls and e-mails. The gallery was
considering its options, he said.
“We’re obviously surprised by the overwhelming response and offense
people have taken,” said Semler, adding that the Holy Week timing was a
coincidence.
The artwork was created from more than 200 pounds of milk chocolate, and
it features Christ with his arms outstretched. The Cavallaro creation
does not include a loincloth
A publicist for the gallery said the artist was not available for
comment.
Cavallaro, who was raised in Canada and Italy, is best known for his
quirky work with food as art: Past efforts include repainting a
Manhattan hotel room in melted mozzarella, spraying 5 tons of pepper
jack cheese on a Wyoming home and festooning a four-poster bed with 312
pounds of processed ham.
LOL! At least they haven't started any riots or burned down any embassy
yet. There's a good still picture of the sculpture (including the
offending appendage) at the artist's site:
http://www.cosimocavallaro.com/main.htm
Maybe Donahue is confused because he doesn't know which part he should
eat first.
--
John #1782
"We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be
white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides."
- Saint Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) Founder of the Jesuit Order.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics |
31 Mar 2007 04:13:44 AM |
|
|
On 31 mrt, 09:11, johac <jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
In article <45fq031pifr5q904c6f8aq2ogsgtra7...@4ax.com>,
stoney <sto...@the.net> wrote:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11669242?GT1=9145
Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics
NYC gallery inundated with angry calls ahead of display during Holy Week
Updated: 9:34 a.m. ET March 30, 2007
NEW YORK - {AP} The Easter season unveiling of an anatomically correct
chocolate sculpture of Jesus Christ, dubbed "My Sweet Lord" by its
creator, has infuriated Catholics preparing to observe some of their
holiest days of the year.
The 6-foot sculpture by Cosimo Cavallaro was to debut Monday evening,
four days before Christians mark the crucifixion of Jesus Christ on Good
Friday. The final day of the exhibit at the Lab Gallery inside
Manhattan's Roger Smith Hotel was planned for Easter Sunday.
"This is one of the worst assaults on Christian sensibilities ever,"
said Bill Donohue, head of the Catholic League, a watchdog group. "It's
not just the ugliness of the portrayal, but the timing - to choose Holy
Week is astounding."
[Oxymoron "Christian Sensibilities"]
The gallery's creative director, Matt Semler, said the Lab and the hotel
were overrun with angry telephone calls and e-mails. The gallery was
considering its options, he said.
"We're obviously surprised by the overwhelming response and offense
people have taken," said Semler, adding that the Holy Week timing was a
coincidence.
The artwork was created from more than 200 pounds of milk chocolate, and
it features Christ with his arms outstretched. The Cavallaro creation
does not include a loincloth
A publicist for the gallery said the artist was not available for
comment.
Cavallaro, who was raised in Canada and Italy, is best known for his
quirky work with food as art: Past efforts include repainting a
Manhattan hotel room in melted mozzarella, spraying 5 tons of pepper
jack cheese on a Wyoming home and festooning a four-poster bed with 312
pounds of processed ham.
LOL! At least they haven't started any riots or burned down any embassy
yet. There's a good still picture of the sculpture (including the
offending appendage) at the artist's site:
http://www.cosimocavallaro.com/main.htm
Maybe Donahue is confused because he doesn't know which part he should
eat first.
It doesn't look particulary tasty
though the frontside surely is an improvement to the backside.
--
John #1782
"We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be
white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides."
- Saint Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) Founder of the Jesuit Order.
So if the boss is telling lies, just swallow them?
How immoral can you get?
Peter van Velzen
March 2007
Amstelveen
The Netherlands
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics |
31 Mar 2007 06:35:47 PM |
|
|
In article <1175332424.866511.134550@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
"pbamvv@worldonline.nl" <pbamvv@worldonline.nl> wrote:
On 31 mrt, 09:11, johac <jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
In article <45fq031pifr5q904c6f8aq2ogsgtra7...@4ax.com>,
stoney <sto...@the.net> wrote:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11669242?GT1=9145
Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics
NYC gallery inundated with angry calls ahead of display during Holy Week
Updated: 9:34 a.m. ET March 30, 2007
NEW YORK - {AP} The Easter season unveiling of an anatomically correct
chocolate sculpture of Jesus Christ, dubbed "My Sweet Lord" by its
creator, has infuriated Catholics preparing to observe some of their
holiest days of the year.
The 6-foot sculpture by Cosimo Cavallaro was to debut Monday evening,
four days before Christians mark the crucifixion of Jesus Christ on Good
Friday. The final day of the exhibit at the Lab Gallery inside
Manhattan's Roger Smith Hotel was planned for Easter Sunday.
"This is one of the worst assaults on Christian sensibilities ever,"
said Bill Donohue, head of the Catholic League, a watchdog group. "It's
not just the ugliness of the portrayal, but the timing - to choose Holy
Week is astounding."
[Oxymoron "Christian Sensibilities"]
The gallery's creative director, Matt Semler, said the Lab and the hotel
were overrun with angry telephone calls and e-mails. The gallery was
considering its options, he said.
"We're obviously surprised by the overwhelming response and offense
people have taken," said Semler, adding that the Holy Week timing was a
coincidence.
The artwork was created from more than 200 pounds of milk chocolate, and
it features Christ with his arms outstretched. The Cavallaro creation
does not include a loincloth
A publicist for the gallery said the artist was not available for
comment.
Cavallaro, who was raised in Canada and Italy, is best known for his
quirky work with food as art: Past efforts include repainting a
Manhattan hotel room in melted mozzarella, spraying 5 tons of pepper
jack cheese on a Wyoming home and festooning a four-poster bed with 312
pounds of processed ham.
LOL! At least they haven't started any riots or burned down any embassy
yet. There's a good still picture of the sculpture (including the
offending appendage) at the artist's site:
http://www.cosimocavallaro.com/main.htm
Maybe Donahue is confused because he doesn't know which part he should
eat first.
It doesn't look particulary tasty
though the frontside surely is an improvement to the backside.
True. Nothing about it looks tasty at all to me.
--
John #1782
"We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be
white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides."
- Saint Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) Founder of the Jesuit Order.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics |
30 Mar 2007 11:14:58 AM |
|
|
On 30 mrt, 18:39, stoney <sto...@the.net> wrote:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11669242?GT1=9145
Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics
NYC gallery inundated with angry calls ahead of display during Holy Week
Updated: 9:34 a.m. ET March 30, 2007
NEW YORK - {AP} The Easter season unveiling of an anatomically correct
chocolate sculpture of Jesus Christ, dubbed "My Sweet Lord" by its
creator, has infuriated Catholics preparing to observe some of their
holiest days of the year.
The 6-foot sculpture by Cosimo Cavallaro was to debut Monday evening,
four days before Christians mark the crucifixion of Jesus Christ on Good
Friday. The final day of the exhibit at the Lab Gallery inside
Manhattan's Roger Smith Hotel was planned for Easter Sunday.
"This is one of the worst assaults on Christian sensibilities ever,"
said Bill Donohue, head of the Catholic League, a watchdog group. "It's
not just the ugliness of the portrayal, but the timing - to choose Holy
Week is astounding."
[Oxymoron "Christian Sensibilities"]
The gallery's creative director, Matt Semler, said the Lab and the hotel
were overrun with angry telephone calls and e-mails. The gallery was
considering its options, he said.
"We're obviously surprised by the overwhelming response and offense
people have taken," said Semler, adding that the Holy Week timing was a
coincidence.
The artwork was created from more than 200 pounds of milk chocolate, and
it features Christ with his arms outstretched. The Cavallaro creation
does not include a loincloth
A publicist for the gallery said the artist was not available for
comment.
Cavallaro, who was raised in Canada and Italy, is best known for his
quirky work with food as art: Past efforts include repainting a
Manhattan hotel room in melted mozzarella, spraying 5 tons of pepper
jack cheese on a Wyoming home and festooning a four-poster bed with 312
pounds of processed ham.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
About half the visitors of the site finds the statue offensive.
The picture on the site can't be the reason,
so I wonder what sets of the offense
The fact that it is chocolate,
the fact that it is ugly
the fact that it is anatomically correct
or the fact that it misses a loincloth.
The latter can be easily "corrected"
Peter van Velzen
March 2007
Amstelveen
The Netherlands
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics |
30 Mar 2007 11:54:40 AM |
|
|
<pbamvv@worldonline.nl> wrote in message
news:1175271298.812606.81050@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
About half the visitors of the site finds the statue offensive.
The picture on the site can't be the reason,
so I wonder what sets of the offense
The fact that it is chocolate,
the fact that it is ugly
the fact that it is anatomically correct
or the fact that it misses a loincloth.
The latter can be easily "corrected"
Wait until he unveils his fudgy Mohammed! Then you'll see some real
fireworks!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pangur Ban" |
|
| Title: Re: Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics |
31 Mar 2007 07:43:29 AM |
|
|
Geoff wrote after much deliberation:
<pbamvv@worldonline.nl> wrote in message
news:1175271298.812606.81050@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
About half the visitors of the site finds the statue offensive.
The picture on the site can't be the reason,
so I wonder what sets of the offense
The fact that it is chocolate,
the fact that it is ugly
the fact that it is anatomically correct
or the fact that it misses a loincloth.
The latter can be easily "corrected"
Wait until he unveils his fudgy Mohammed! Then you'll see some real
fireworks!
figs might be more appropriate?
--
Pangur Ban
"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a
well-preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways ......totally
worn-out..... shouting, 'Yeehaw.....what a ride!'"
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics |
30 Mar 2007 02:20:27 PM |
|
|
<pbamvv@worldonline.nl> wrote in message
news:1175271298.812606.81050@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On 30 mrt, 18:39, stoney <sto...@the.net> wrote:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11669242?GT1=9145
Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics
NYC gallery inundated with angry calls ahead of display during Holy Week
Updated: 9:34 a.m. ET March 30, 2007
NEW YORK - {AP} The Easter season unveiling of an anatomically correct
chocolate sculpture of Jesus Christ, dubbed "My Sweet Lord" by its
creator, has infuriated Catholics preparing to observe some of their
holiest days of the year.
The 6-foot sculpture by Cosimo Cavallaro was to debut Monday evening,
four days before Christians mark the crucifixion of Jesus Christ on Good
Friday. The final day of the exhibit at the Lab Gallery inside
Manhattan's Roger Smith Hotel was planned for Easter Sunday.
"This is one of the worst assaults on Christian sensibilities ever,"
said Bill Donohue, head of the Catholic League, a watchdog group. "It's
not just the ugliness of the portrayal, but the timing - to choose Holy
Week is astounding."
[Oxymoron "Christian Sensibilities"]
The gallery's creative director, Matt Semler, said the Lab and the hotel
were overrun with angry telephone calls and e-mails. The gallery was
considering its options, he said.
"We're obviously surprised by the overwhelming response and offense
people have taken," said Semler, adding that the Holy Week timing was a
coincidence.
The artwork was created from more than 200 pounds of milk chocolate, and
it features Christ with his arms outstretched. The Cavallaro creation
does not include a loincloth
A publicist for the gallery said the artist was not available for
comment.
Cavallaro, who was raised in Canada and Italy, is best known for his
quirky work with food as art: Past efforts include repainting a
Manhattan hotel room in melted mozzarella, spraying 5 tons of pepper
jack cheese on a Wyoming home and festooning a four-poster bed with 312
pounds of processed ham.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
About half the visitors of the site finds the statue offensive.
The picture on the site can't be the reason,
so I wonder what sets of the offense
The fact that it is chocolate,
the fact that it is ugly
the fact that it is anatomically correct
or the fact that it misses a loincloth.
The latter can be easily "corrected"
These don't seem to bother the christians - These are sold at Easter.
Personally, I find them disturbing:
http://www.hannakrausecandy.com/easter/images/Crosseso2.jpg
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Smiler" |
|
| Title: Re: Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics |
31 Mar 2007 08:00:43 PM |
|
|
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in message
news:5755svF2bs9qmU1@mid.individual.net...
<pbamvv@worldonline.nl> wrote in message
news:1175271298.812606.81050@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On 30 mrt, 18:39, stoney <sto...@the.net> wrote:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11669242?GT1=9145
Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics
NYC gallery inundated with angry calls ahead of display during Holy Week
Updated: 9:34 a.m. ET March 30, 2007
NEW YORK - {AP} The Easter season unveiling of an anatomically correct
chocolate sculpture of Jesus Christ, dubbed "My Sweet Lord" by its
creator, has infuriated Catholics preparing to observe some of their
holiest days of the year.
The 6-foot sculpture by Cosimo Cavallaro was to debut Monday evening,
four days before Christians mark the crucifixion of Jesus Christ on Good
Friday. The final day of the exhibit at the Lab Gallery inside
Manhattan's Roger Smith Hotel was planned for Easter Sunday.
"This is one of the worst assaults on Christian sensibilities ever,"
said Bill Donohue, head of the Catholic League, a watchdog group. "It's
not just the ugliness of the portrayal, but the timing - to choose Holy
Week is astounding."
[Oxymoron "Christian Sensibilities"]
The gallery's creative director, Matt Semler, said the Lab and the hotel
were overrun with angry telephone calls and e-mails. The gallery was
considering its options, he said.
"We're obviously surprised by the overwhelming response and offense
people have taken," said Semler, adding that the Holy Week timing was a
coincidence.
The artwork was created from more than 200 pounds of milk chocolate, and
it features Christ with his arms outstretched. The Cavallaro creation
does not include a loincloth
A publicist for the gallery said the artist was not available for
comment.
Cavallaro, who was raised in Canada and Italy, is best known for his
quirky work with food as art: Past efforts include repainting a
Manhattan hotel room in melted mozzarella, spraying 5 tons of pepper
jack cheese on a Wyoming home and festooning a four-poster bed with 312
pounds of processed ham.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
About half the visitors of the site finds the statue offensive.
The picture on the site can't be the reason,
so I wonder what sets of the offense
The fact that it is chocolate,
the fact that it is ugly
the fact that it is anatomically correct
or the fact that it misses a loincloth.
The latter can be easily "corrected"
These don't seem to bother the christians - These are sold at Easter.
Personally, I find them disturbing:
http://www.hannakrausecandy.com/easter/images/Crosseso2.jpg
A blowtorch should solve that problem.
Smiler,
The godless one
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics |
02 Apr 2007 01:19:33 PM |
|
|
"Smiler" <Smiler@Joe.King.com> wrote in message
news:%uDPh.21970$NK3.18110@newsfe6-win.ntli.net...
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in message
news:5755svF2bs9qmU1@mid.individual.net...
<pbamvv@worldonline.nl> wrote in message
news:1175271298.812606.81050@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On 30 mrt, 18:39, stoney <sto...@the.net> wrote:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11669242?GT1=9145
Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics
NYC gallery inundated with angry calls ahead of display during Holy
Week
Updated: 9:34 a.m. ET March 30, 2007
NEW YORK - {AP} The Easter season unveiling of an anatomically correct
chocolate sculpture of Jesus Christ, dubbed "My Sweet Lord" by its
creator, has infuriated Catholics preparing to observe some of their
holiest days of the year.
The 6-foot sculpture by Cosimo Cavallaro was to debut Monday evening,
four days before Christians mark the crucifixion of Jesus Christ on
Good
Friday. The final day of the exhibit at the Lab Gallery inside
Manhattan's Roger Smith Hotel was planned for Easter Sunday.
"This is one of the worst assaults on Christian sensibilities ever,"
said Bill Donohue, head of the Catholic League, a watchdog group. "It's
not just the ugliness of the portrayal, but the timing - to choose Holy
Week is astounding."
[Oxymoron "Christian Sensibilities"]
The gallery's creative director, Matt Semler, said the Lab and the
hotel
were overrun with angry telephone calls and e-mails. The gallery was
considering its options, he said.
"We're obviously surprised by the overwhelming response and offense
people have taken," said Semler, adding that the Holy Week timing was a
coincidence.
The artwork was created from more than 200 pounds of milk chocolate,
and
it features Christ with his arms outstretched. The Cavallaro creation
does not include a loincloth
A publicist for the gallery said the artist was not available for
comment.
Cavallaro, who was raised in Canada and Italy, is best known for his
quirky work with food as art: Past efforts include repainting a
Manhattan hotel room in melted mozzarella, spraying 5 tons of pepper
jack cheese on a Wyoming home and festooning a four-poster bed with 312
pounds of processed ham.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
About half the visitors of the site finds the statue offensive.
The picture on the site can't be the reason,
so I wonder what sets of the offense
The fact that it is chocolate,
the fact that it is ugly
the fact that it is anatomically correct
or the fact that it misses a loincloth.
The latter can be easily "corrected"
These don't seem to bother the christians - These are sold at Easter.
Personally, I find them disturbing:
http://www.hannakrausecandy.com/easter/images/Crosseso2.jpg
A blowtorch should solve that problem.
Damnit! A Smartie up the nose! ACK! :)
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Hatter" |
|
| Title: Re: Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics |
30 Mar 2007 02:28:46 PM |
|
|
On Mar 30, 3:20 pm, "Robibnikoff" <witchy...@broomstick.com> wrote:
<pba...@worldonline.nl> wrote in message
news:1175271298.812606.81050@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On 30 mrt, 18:39, stoney <sto...@the.net> wrote:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11669242?GT1=9145
Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics
NYC gallery inundated with angry calls ahead of display during Holy Week
Updated: 9:34 a.m. ET March 30, 2007
NEW YORK - {AP} The Easter season unveiling of an anatomically correct
chocolate sculpture of Jesus Christ, dubbed "My Sweet Lord" by its
creator, has infuriated Catholics preparing to observe some of their
holiest days of the year.
The 6-foot sculpture by Cosimo Cavallaro was to debut Monday evening,
four days before Christians mark the crucifixion of Jesus Christ on Good
Friday. The final day of the exhibit at the Lab Gallery inside
Manhattan's Roger Smith Hotel was planned for Easter Sunday.
"This is one of the worst assaults on Christian sensibilities ever,"
said Bill Donohue, head of the Catholic League, a watchdog group. "It's
not just the ugliness of the portrayal, but the timing - to choose Holy
Week is astounding."
[Oxymoron "Christian Sensibilities"]
The gallery's creative director, Matt Semler, said the Lab and the hotel
were overrun with angry telephone calls and e-mails. The gallery was
considering its options, he said.
"We're obviously surprised by the overwhelming response and offense
people have taken," said Semler, adding that the Holy Week timing was a
coincidence.
The artwork was created from more than 200 pounds of milk chocolate, and
it features Christ with his arms outstretched. The Cavallaro creation
does not include a loincloth
A publicist for the gallery said the artist was not available for
comment.
Cavallaro, who was raised in Canada and Italy, is best known for his
quirky work with food as art: Past efforts include repainting a
Manhattan hotel room in melted mozzarella, spraying 5 tons of pepper
jack cheese on a Wyoming home and festooning a four-poster bed with 312
pounds of processed ham.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
About half the visitors of the site finds the statue offensive.
The picture on the site can't be the reason,
so I wonder what sets of the offense
The fact that it is chocolate,
the fact that it is ugly
the fact that it is anatomically correct
or the fact that it misses a loincloth.
The latter can be easily "corrected"
These don't seem to bother the christians - These are sold at Easter.
Personally, I find them disturbing:
http://www.hannakrausecandy.com/easter/images/Crosseso2.jpg
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
better yet, make your own:
http://www.intotheoven.com/product_info.php?products_id=411
Hatter
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lisbeth Andersson" |
|
| Title: Re: Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics |
31 Mar 2007 02:11:34 PM |
|
|
"pbamvv@worldonline.nl" <pbamvv@worldonline.nl> wrote in
news:1175271298.812606.81050@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
About half the visitors of the site finds the statue offensive.
The picture on the site can't be the reason,
so I wonder what sets of the offense
The fact that it is chocolate,
the fact that it is ugly
the fact that it is anatomically correct
or the fact that it misses a loincloth.
Anybody knows where to find the dress code for crusifixees? I suspect
no loincloth was involved.
Lisbeth.
----
The day I don't learn anything new is the day I die.
*What we know is not nearly as interesting as *how we know it.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics |
21 Apr 2007 06:12:47 PM |
|
|
On 31 Mar 2007 19:11:34 GMT, Lisbeth Andersson <lisand@bredband.net>
wrote in alt.atheism
"pbamvv@worldonline.nl" <pbamvv@worldonline.nl> wrote in
news:1175271298.812606.81050@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
About half the visitors of the site finds the statue offensive.
The picture on the site can't be the reason,
so I wonder what sets of the offense
The fact that it is chocolate,
the fact that it is ugly
the fact that it is anatomically correct
or the fact that it misses a loincloth.
Anybody knows where to find the dress code for crusifixees? I suspect
no loincloth was involved.
So was he well hung? Hung well? Or both? ;)
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics |
21 Apr 2007 07:25:15 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 16:12:47 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <ei6l23ltja508h9jcpe8tagv0g8qvb3j8l@4ax.com>
On 31 Mar 2007 19:11:34 GMT, Lisbeth Andersson <lisand@bredband.net>
wrote in alt.atheism
"pbamvv@worldonline.nl" <pbamvv@worldonline.nl> wrote in
news:1175271298.812606.81050@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
About half the visitors of the site finds the statue offensive.
The picture on the site can't be the reason,
so I wonder what sets of the offense
The fact that it is chocolate,
the fact that it is ugly
the fact that it is anatomically correct
or the fact that it misses a loincloth.
Anybody knows where to find the dress code for crusifixees? I suspect
no loincloth was involved.
So was he well hung? Hung well? Or both? ;)
Roman soldier to Jesus: "My, that's a rather nasty ***** you have
there."
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics |
23 Apr 2007 02:11:14 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 09:55:15 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 16:12:47 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <ei6l23ltja508h9jcpe8tagv0g8qvb3j8l@4ax.com>
On 31 Mar 2007 19:11:34 GMT, Lisbeth Andersson <lisand@bredband.net>
wrote in alt.atheism
"pbamvv@worldonline.nl" <pbamvv@worldonline.nl> wrote in
news:1175271298.812606.81050@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
About half the visitors of the site finds the statue offensive.
The picture on the site can't be the reason,
so I wonder what sets of the offense
The fact that it is chocolate,
the fact that it is ugly
the fact that it is anatomically correct
or the fact that it misses a loincloth.
Anybody knows where to find the dress code for crusifixees? I suspect
no loincloth was involved.
So was he well hung? Hung well? Or both? ;)
Roman soldier to Jesus: "My, that's a rather nasty ***** you have
there."
Syphallis?
--
Atheist n A person to be pitied in that he is
unable to believe things for which there is
no evidence, and who has thus deprived himself of
a convenient means of feeling superior to others.
—Chaz Bufe, The American Heretic’s Dictionary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics |
23 Apr 2007 04:57:28 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:11:14 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <661q23hq76sjkui8mf7pkb3c08s5ss936p@4ax.com>
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 09:55:15 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 16:12:47 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <ei6l23ltja508h9jcpe8tagv0g8qvb3j8l@4ax.com>
On 31 Mar 2007 19:11:34 GMT, Lisbeth Andersson <lisand@bredband.net>
wrote in alt.atheism
"pbamvv@worldonline.nl" <pbamvv@worldonline.nl> wrote in
news:1175271298.812606.81050@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
About half the visitors of the site finds the statue offensive.
The picture on the site can't be the reason,
so I wonder what sets of the offense
The fact that it is chocolate,
the fact that it is ugly
the fact that it is anatomically correct
or the fact that it misses a loincloth.
Anybody knows where to find the dress code for crusifixees? I suspect
no loincloth was involved.
So was he well hung? Hung well? Or both? ;)
Roman soldier to Jesus: "My, that's a rather nasty ***** you have
there."
Syphallis?
A common fallacy.
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics |
04 May 2007 11:48:55 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:27:28 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:11:14 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <661q23hq76sjkui8mf7pkb3c08s5ss936p@4ax.com>
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 09:55:15 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 16:12:47 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <ei6l23ltja508h9jcpe8tagv0g8qvb3j8l@4ax.com>
On 31 Mar 2007 19:11:34 GMT, Lisbeth Andersson <lisand@bredband.net>
wrote in alt.atheism
"pbamvv@worldonline.nl" <pbamvv@worldonline.nl> wrote in
news:1175271298.812606.81050@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
About half the visitors of the site finds the statue offensive.
The picture on the site can't be the reason,
so I wonder what sets of the offense
The fact that it is chocolate,
the fact that it is ugly
the fact that it is anatomically correct
or the fact that it misses a loincloth.
Anybody knows where to find the dress code for crusifixees? I suspect
no loincloth was involved.
So was he well hung? Hung well? Or both? ;)
Roman soldier to Jesus: "My, that's a rather nasty ***** you have
there."
Syphallis?
A common fallacy.
Pharisse fallacies?
--
Atheist n A person to be pitied in that he is
unable to believe things for which there is
no evidence, and who has thus deprived himself of
a convenient means of feeling superior to others.
—Chaz Bufe, The American Heretic’s Dictionary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics |
05 May 2007 01:54:12 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 04 May 2007 21:48:55 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <t43o33p18cma9a9sdlh74nmhohh87u2ok7@4ax.com>
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:27:28 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:11:14 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <661q23hq76sjkui8mf7pkb3c08s5ss936p@4ax.com>
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 09:55:15 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 16:12:47 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <ei6l23ltja508h9jcpe8tagv0g8qvb3j8l@4ax.com>
On 31 Mar 2007 19:11:34 GMT, Lisbeth Andersson <lisand@bredband.net>
wrote in alt.atheism
"pbamvv@worldonline.nl" <pbamvv@worldonline.nl> wrote in
news:1175271298.812606.81050@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
About half the visitors of the site finds the statue offensive.
The picture on the site can't be the reason,
so I wonder what sets of the offense
The fact that it is chocolate,
the fact that it is ugly
the fact that it is anatomically correct
or the fact that it misses a loincloth.
Anybody knows where to find the dress code for crusifixees? I suspect
no loincloth was involved.
So was he well hung? Hung well? Or both? ;)
Roman soldier to Jesus: "My, that's a rather nasty ***** you have
there."
Syphallis?
A common fallacy.
Pharisse fallacies?
Members of the People's Front of Judea will now rise.
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Smiler" |
|
| Title: Re: Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics |
05 May 2007 08:21:55 PM |
|
|
"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:rfao33l2gifsgsbumv9deem6f343g7pv3d@4ax.com...
On Fri, 04 May 2007 21:48:55 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <t43o33p18cma9a9sdlh74nmhohh87u2ok7@4ax.com>
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:27:28 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:11:14 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <661q23hq76sjkui8mf7pkb3c08s5ss936p@4ax.com>
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 09:55:15 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 16:12:47 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <ei6l23ltja508h9jcpe8tagv0g8qvb3j8l@4ax.com>
On 31 Mar 2007 19:11:34 GMT, Lisbeth Andersson <lisand@bredband.net>
wrote in alt.atheism
"pbamvv@worldonline.nl" <pbamvv@worldonline.nl> wrote in
news:1175271298.812606.81050@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
About half the visitors of the site finds the statue offensive.
The picture on the site can't be the reason,
so I wonder what sets of the offense
The fact that it is chocolate,
the fact that it is ugly
the fact that it is anatomically correct
or the fact that it misses a loincloth.
Anybody knows where to find the dress code for crusifixees? I suspect
no loincloth was involved.
So was he well hung? Hung well? Or both? ;)
Roman soldier to Jesus: "My, that's a rather nasty ***** you have
there."
Syphallis?
A common fallacy.
Pharisse fallacies?
Members of the People's Front of Judea will now rise.
You're just a Very Naughty Boy!
Smiler,
The godless one
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics |
05 May 2007 09:50:25 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 06 May 2007 01:21:55 GMT, "Smiler" <Smiler@Joe.King.com>
wrote:
- Refer: <T4a%h.1964$MH3.628@newsfe4-win.ntli.net>
"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:rfao33l2gifsgsbumv9deem6f343g7pv3d@4ax.com...
On Fri, 04 May 2007 21:48:55 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <t43o33p18cma9a9sdlh74nmhohh87u2ok7@4ax.com>
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:27:28 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:11:14 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <661q23hq76sjkui8mf7pkb3c08s5ss936p@4ax.com>
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 09:55:15 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 16:12:47 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <ei6l23ltja508h9jcpe8tagv0g8qvb3j8l@4ax.com>
On 31 Mar 2007 19:11:34 GMT, Lisbeth Andersson <lisand@bredband.net>
wrote in alt.atheism
"pbamvv@worldonline.nl" <pbamvv@worldonline.nl> wrote in
news:1175271298.812606.81050@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
About half the visitors of the site finds the statue offensive.
The picture on the site can't be the reason,
so I wonder what sets of the offense
The fact that it is chocolate,
the fact that it is ugly
the fact that it is anatomically correct
or the fact that it misses a loincloth.
Anybody knows where to find the dress code for crusifixees? I suspect
no loincloth was involved.
So was he well hung? Hung well? Or both? ;)
Roman soldier to Jesus: "My, that's a rather nasty ***** you have
there."
Syphallis?
A common fallacy.
Pharisse fallacies?
Members of the People's Front of Judea will now rise.
You're just a Very Naughty Boy!
Romani eunt domum.
No, no.
Romanus ex dumus.
No, no...
--
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics |
11 May 2007 09:58:23 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 05 May 2007 16:24:12 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Fri, 04 May 2007 21:48:55 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <t43o33p18cma9a9sdlh74nmhohh87u2ok7@4ax.com>
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:27:28 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
[]
Anybody knows where to find the dress code for crusifixees? I suspect
no loincloth was involved.
So was he well hung? Hung well? Or both? ;)
Roman soldier to Jesus: "My, that's a rather nasty ***** you have
there."
Syphallis?
A common fallacy.
Pharisse fallacies?
Members of the People's Front of Judea will now rise.
There are no turgid members.
--
Atheist n A person to be pitied in that he is
unable to believe things for which there is
no evidence, and who has thus deprived himself of
a convenient means of feeling superior to others.
—Chaz Bufe, The American Heretic’s Dictionary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics |
11 May 2007 05:48:18 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 11 May 2007 07:58:23 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <i319435p8gfv2h2ig3d0580ql16mc9rle8@4ax.com>
On Sat, 05 May 2007 16:24:12 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Fri, 04 May 2007 21:48:55 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <t43o33p18cma9a9sdlh74nmhohh87u2ok7@4ax.com>
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:27:28 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
[]
Anybody knows where to find the dress code for crusifixees? I suspect
no loincloth was involved.
So was he well hung? Hung well? Or both? ;)
Roman soldier to Jesus: "My, that's a rather nasty ***** you have
there."
Syphallis?
A common fallacy.
Pharisse fallacies?
Members of the People's Front of Judea will now rise.
There are no turgid members.
Is that a reference to the header of this thread?
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics |
20 May 2007 09:07:39 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 12 May 2007 08:18:18 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Fri, 11 May 2007 07:58:23 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <i319435p8gfv2h2ig3d0580ql16mc9rle8@4ax.com>
On Sat, 05 May 2007 16:24:12 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Fri, 04 May 2007 21:48:55 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <t43o33p18cma9a9sdlh74nmhohh87u2ok7@4ax.com>
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:27:28 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
[]
Anybody knows where to find the dress code for crusifixees? I suspect
no loincloth was involved.
So was he well hung? Hung well? Or both? ;)
Roman soldier to Jesus: "My, that's a rather nasty ***** you have
there."
Syphallis?
A common fallacy.
Pharisse fallacies?
Members of the People's Front of Judea will now rise.
There are no turgid members.
Is that a reference to the header of this thread?
He melts in their mouths not in their hands...
--
Atheist n A person to be pitied in that he is
unable to believe things for which there is
no evidence, and who has thus deprived himself of
a convenient means of feeling superior to others.
—Chaz Bufe, The American Heretic’s Dictionary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics |
20 May 2007 07:40:14 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 20 May 2007 07:07:39 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <ggl053l40cqf4mukab70kg99g6ha5qpgej@4ax.com>
On Sat, 12 May 2007 08:18:18 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Fri, 11 May 2007 07:58:23 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <i319435p8gfv2h2ig3d0580ql16mc9rle8@4ax.com>
On Sat, 05 May 2007 16:24:12 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Fri, 04 May 2007 21:48:55 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <t43o33p18cma9a9sdlh74nmhohh87u2ok7@4ax.com>
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:27:28 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
[]
Anybody knows where to find the dress code for crusifixees? I suspect
no loincloth was involved.
So was he well hung? Hung well? Or both? ;)
Roman soldier to Jesus: "My, that's a rather nasty ***** you have
there."
Syphallis?
A common fallacy.
Pharisse fallacies?
Members of the People's Front of Judea will now rise.
There are no turgid members.
Is that a reference to the header of this thread?
He melts in their mouths not in their hands...
And to think I used to wonder why Jesus freaks held their hands
together in front of their mouths when they imagine "communing" with
him!
Brings a new meaning to Holey!
"I did not have sex with that ghost."
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics |
25 May 2007 07:42:12 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 21 May 2007 10:10:14 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Sun, 20 May 2007 07:07:39 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <ggl053l40cqf4mukab70kg99g6ha5qpgej@4ax.com>
On Sat, 12 May 2007 08:18:18 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Fri, 11 May 2007 07:58:23 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <i319435p8gfv2h2ig3d0580ql16mc9rle8@4ax.com>
On Sat, 05 May 2007 16:24:12 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Fri, 04 May 2007 21:48:55 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <t43o33p18cma9a9sdlh74nmhohh87u2ok7@4ax.com>
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:27:28 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
[]
Anybody knows where to find the dress code for crusifixees? I suspect
no loincloth was involved.
So was he well hung? Hung well? Or both? ;)
Roman soldier to Jesus: "My, that's a rather nasty ***** you have
there."
Syphallis?
A common fallacy.
Pharisse fallacies?
Members of the People's Front of Judea will now rise.
There are no turgid members.
Is that a reference to the header of this thread?
He melts in their mouths not in their hands...
And to think I used to wonder why Jesus freaks held their hands
together in front of their mouths when they imagine "communing" with
him!
Brings a new meaning to Holey!
"I did not have sex with that ghost."
The better to smell the unwashed merkin.
--
Atheist n A person to be pitied in that he is
unable to believe things for which there is
no evidence, and who has thus deprived himself of
a convenient means of feeling superior to others.
—Chaz Bufe, The American Heretic’s Dictionary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics |
25 May 2007 08:13:56 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 25 May 2007 17:42:12 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <jh0f535qo18gvindpeufdphfj96l8gjgpo@4ax.com>
On Mon, 21 May 2007 10:10:14 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Sun, 20 May 2007 07:07:39 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <ggl053l40cqf4mukab70kg99g6ha5qpgej@4ax.com>
On Sat, 12 May 2007 08:18:18 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Fri, 11 May 2007 07:58:23 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <i319435p8gfv2h2ig3d0580ql16mc9rle8@4ax.com>
On Sat, 05 May 2007 16:24:12 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Fri, 04 May 2007 21:48:55 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <t43o33p18cma9a9sdlh74nmhohh87u2ok7@4ax.com>
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:27:28 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
[]
Anybody knows where to find the dress code for crusifixees? I suspect
no loincloth was involved.
So was he well hung? Hung well? Or both? ;)
Roman soldier to Jesus: "My, that's a rather nasty ***** you have
there."
Syphallis?
A common fallacy.
Pharisse fallacies?
Members of the People's Front of Judea will now rise.
There are no turgid members.
Is that a reference to the header of this thread?
He melts in their mouths not in their hands...
And to think I used to wonder why Jesus freaks held their hands
together in front of their mouths when they imagine "communing" with
him!
Brings a new meaning to Holey!
"I did not have sex with that ghost."
The better to smell the unwashed merkin.
For Jesus today, a "Merkin of Thorns", perhaps?
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics |
05 Jun 2007 10:26:50 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 26 May 2007 10:43:56 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Fri, 25 May 2007 17:42:12 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <jh0f535qo18gvindpeufdphfj96l8gjgpo@4ax.com>
On Mon, 21 May 2007 10:10:14 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Sun, 20 May 2007 07:07:39 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <ggl053l40cqf4mukab70kg99g6ha5qpgej@4ax.com>
On Sat, 12 May 2007 08:18:18 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Fri, 11 May 2007 07:58:23 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <i319435p8gfv2h2ig3d0580ql16mc9rle8@4ax.com>
On Sat, 05 May 2007 16:24:12 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Fri, 04 May 2007 21:48:55 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <t43o33p18cma9a9sdlh74nmhohh87u2ok7@4ax.com>
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:27:28 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
[]
Anybody knows where to find the dress code for crusifixees? I suspect
no loincloth was involved.
So was he well hung? Hung well? Or both? ;)
Roman soldier to Jesus: "My, that's a rather nasty ***** you have
there."
Syphallis?
A common fallacy.
Pharisse fallacies?
Members of the People's Front of Judea will now rise.
There are no turgid members.
Is that a reference to the header of this thread?
He melts in their mouths not in their hands...
And to think I used to wonder why Jesus freaks held their hands
together in front of their mouths when they imagine "communing" with
him!
Brings a new meaning to Holey!
"I did not have sex with that ghost."
The better to smell the unwashed merkin.
For Jesus today, a "Merkin of Thorns", perhaps?
Testical testing....
--
Atheist n A person to be pitied in that he is
unable to believe things for which there is
no evidence, and who has thus deprived himself of
a convenient means of feeling superior to others.
—Chaz Bufe, The American Heretic’s Dictionary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Smiler" |
|
| Title: Re: Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics |
05 Jun 2007 07:17:59 PM |
|
|
"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote in message
news:b50b63p5miuimn5eve8kfcfhdlmu79eh96@4ax.com...
On Sat, 26 May 2007 10:43:56 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Fri, 25 May 2007 17:42:12 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <jh0f535qo18gvindpeufdphfj96l8gjgpo@4ax.com>
On Mon, 21 May 2007 10:10:14 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Sun, 20 May 2007 07:07:39 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <ggl053l40cqf4mukab70kg99g6ha5qpgej@4ax.com>
On Sat, 12 May 2007 08:18:18 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Fri, 11 May 2007 07:58:23 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <i319435p8gfv2h2ig3d0580ql16mc9rle8@4ax.com>
On Sat, 05 May 2007 16:24:12 +0930, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Fri, 04 May 2007 21:48:55 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <t43o33p18cma9a9sdlh74nmhohh87u2ok7@4ax.com>
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:27:28 +0930, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
[]
Anybody knows where to find the dress code for crusifixees? I
suspect
no loincloth was involved.
So was he well hung? Hung well? Or both? ;)
Roman soldier to Jesus: "My, that's a rather nasty ***** you
have
there."
Syphallis?
A common fallacy.
Pharisse fallacies?
Members of the People's Front of Judea will now rise.
There are no turgid members.
Is that a reference to the header of this thread?
He melts in their mouths not in their hands...
And to think I used to wonder why Jesus freaks held their hands
together in front of their mouths when they imagine "communing" with
him!
Brings a new meaning to Holey!
"I did not have sex with that ghost."
The better to smell the unwashed merkin.
For Jesus today, a "Merkin of Thorns", perhaps?
Testical testing....
Chocolate testament....still a load of balls.
Smiler,
The godless one
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Artist's chocolate Jesus angers Catholics |
05 Jun 2007 09:13:28 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 08:26:50 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <b50b63p5miuimn5eve8kfcfhdlmu79eh96@4ax.com>
On Sat, 26 May 2007 10:43:56 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Fri, 25 May 2007 17:42:12 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <jh0f535qo18gvindpeufdphfj96l8gjgpo@4ax.com>
On Mon, 21 May 2007 10:10:14 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Sun, 20 May 2007 07:07:39 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <ggl053l40cqf4mukab70kg99g6ha5qpgej@4ax.com>
On Sat, 12 May 2007 08:18:18 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Fri, 11 May 2007 07:58:23 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <i319435p8gfv2h2ig3d0580ql16mc9rle8@4ax.com>
On Sat, 05 May 2007 16:24:12 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
On Fri, 04 May 2007 21:48:55 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
- Refer: <t43o33p18cma9a9sdlh74nmhohh87u2ok7@4ax.com>
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:27:28 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
[]
Anybody knows where to find the dress code for crusifixees? I suspect
no loincloth was involved.
So was he well hung? Hung well? Or both? ;)
Roman soldier to Jesus: "My, that's a rather nasty ***** you have
there."
Syphallis?
A common fallacy.
Pharisse fallacies?
Members of the People's Front of Judea will now rise.
There are no turgid members.
Is that a reference to the header of this thread?
He melts in their mouths not in their hands...
And to think I used to wonder why Jesus freaks held their hands
together in front of their mouths when they imagine "communing" with
him!
Brings a new meaning to Holey!
"I did not have sex with that ghost."
The better to smell the unwashed merkin.
For Jesus today, a "Merkin of Thorns", perhaps?
Testical testing....
Enough to make you cross.
--
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
