"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1151763511.167947.228740@j8g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Johnny wrote:

"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1151691398.457593.182100@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

Johnny wrote:

"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1151635474.541298.227520@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

Johnny wrote:

"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1151610372.633740.321990@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...

Johnny wrote:

"gatt" <LiveFromTheClocktower@gfy.com> wrote in message
news:1XSog.4602$Oh1.3532@news01.roc.ny...

Yeahman. SCREW CHOICE. People in America shouldn't have
choice.
Christians should decide everything for them.

Your words. Thank you for the vote.

Don't thank me. Your type definately doesn't get my vote.

Going back on your words?

The words were sarcasm.

They are your words, regardless.

Add a dash of sarcasm though, and they mean something a little
different.

I'm sorry, is that concept to complex for you?

Not all all. That is why I thanked you for your vote.
It is your words, not your attitude I was reading.

Ooops, YOUR bad.

I knew you were being sarcastic, but knowing that only shows me
you
are a
liar at face value.

Which is why your verbatim ***** doesn't hold water. Writing
is
something that is deeper than words at face value. But, I'll
leave
it
up to you to show the world you're an idiot.

Which is it now?
Are you a liar or were you telling the truth?

You're a liar.

Nah. Either stand up to the words you wrote, and stop backtracking,
and
write what you mean, rather acting like someone who thinks sarcasm
is
what
people are supposed to believe in print; or, let people believe
your
sarcastic remarks and then when you turn your tail let them know
you
to
be a
liar.

***** off liar.

Sorry, wimpboy, idiotbrain.
LOL!
I am not a liar.

Sorry, wimpboy, idiotbrain.
LOL!
You ARE a liar.

No one else would have any problem detecting sarcasm.

I had no problem detecting his sarcasm

Obviously, another lie.

which is a lie, according to him
already.
And, you.
And, me.
Which makes it unanimous that he is a liar.

Everyone knows you to be the real liar.

If you have a problem, that's exactly what it is, YOURS.

Nah. He made himself into a liar, and you have helped to do that

Liar.

Mystery solved.

No mystery to me.
You are sarcastic, which means you were lying.

Using sarcasm doesn't make anyone a liar,

*****. Read the actual words he wrote when he backtracked.

I read them, with the sarcams intact.

I am taking his words at face value.

BIg fucking deal, they were written with sarcasm, which means you
reading them at face value makes you illiterate.

Wrong, again. I took them at face value to illustrate his words as a vote
for what he wrote.
I also knew he was being sarcastic.

So, you knew he was being sarcastic,

Pretty much.

but took his words at face value

He wrote them.

to try and argue that he was lying.

I wasn't arguing. I was answering some deviant's attack.

That's pretty dishonest of you.

I didn't write what he wrote and i wasn't being sarcastic.

So, which one do you prefer now?
Do you want his words, verbatim, to be considered a lie from him, or do
you
want them to be considered his personal stance?

See above.

Why? I am not a sarcastic lar.

Especially, after you
admitted that you detected the sarcasm.

How can I be illiterate if I know what they mean whether they are sarcasm
or
not sarcastic?

"I also knew he was being sarcastic".

You got a problem with people knowing you type people are assholes?

YOU KNEW, but chose to lie about
what he said anyhow.

Where?
Where did I lie about what he said?
Why can't you perverted, demented, gay freaks write what you mean rather
than going overboard with an emotional, wimpy, effeminate, sarcastic,
spoiled brat rant?

I appreciate the vote.

The only vote you get from me is "illiterate ***** of the year"

Nah. I know what those words mean.
Too bad you can't get by a day in your life without resorting to sarcasm.

You've just proven your a dishonest liar

Your mind is locked in self-deceptions.

by admitting you knew what he
wrote was written with sarcasm but chose to say they meant something
else.

How do the words he wrote mean other than what they say?

Given that, why should anyone believe what you wrote above,
LIAR?

It isn't my words that are in question here, idiot.

If he retracts it then we know he is a flippant, untrustworthy type.

you illiterate *****.

Now, you show the illiteracy to be on the part of the sarcastic types.
If you can't write what you mean, why are you writing?

If you can detect sarcasm as you claim, why are you trying to argue
that his statement means something else, liar?

Me, lying?
I take his words verbatim, as if he submitted them on an affidavit.

But then admitted you knew they were written with sarcasm.

So?
His attitude and his words are not in agreement.

You're not
very smart are you.

Au Contraire.
How would you like to be in court and utter some sarcastic statement and the
judge say to you, "So be it. You have judged yourself with your own tongue."
You are obvioously the idiot.

That is why I take his words at face value, and the sarcasm is something I
can use to say that he is a liar if he is not for what he wrote.

I appreciate the vote.
If he wants to say they are sarcasm, then his verbatim language shows him
to
be untrustworthy and willing not to be taken seriously.
I knew they were sarcastic, on his part.

You've just shown yourself to be dishonest.

Wrong, idiot.

Whine all you want, your
words mean nothing.

*****, sarcastic deviant.

Do you
always come up with this kind of ***** to try and get out of
looking
stupid?

This isn't making me look stupid.

Let's see. You admit that you detected the sarcasm, but then want to
twist what he wrote in a sleazy attempt to make it look like he wrote
something else.

I didn't twist any words he wrote.
Read them for yourself.

I did, and I read them with the sarcasm they were written with and
understood them.

No one cares about the sarcasm,

other than it shows him to be a liar.

Yes, that makes you look stupid.

Nah. It makes you look stupid and illiterate.

This from an admitted liar.

You are admitting you are a liar now?

I didn't write what he wrote.

DUH!!! No kidding?

Yep.
Which means it isn't me who stuck their foot in their mouth.

You knew the words were written with sarcasm,

Which has no bearing on the meaning of the words themselves.

but chose to lie about
them

Nah.

I accepted his words at face value.

Even though you detected his sarcasm, liar?

Not lying.
Are you incapable of understanding both verbatim language and sarcasm?
Why are you so inept?

Why are you so dishonest about what he wrote?

I am not dishonest about what he wrote.
I understand what he wrote, and I know he was being sarcastic.

Then for some reason you and he both want to retract them.

I never tried to retract them LIAR.

Sure you did.
You say they were sarcasm.
That is a total retraction of the words he wrote.

They WERE written with sarcasm and you even admitted it.

Big deal that I admitted it.
I didn't write what he wrote.
I wasn't being sarcastic.

So, claiming
that they were sarcasm is a true statement and not a retraction of
anything.

It is a retraction of the verbatim words, idiot.

*****, you are one stupid *****.

Nah.. You are the idiot, you piece of sarcastic *****.

[snip]