Atheisms Origins

Religions > Atheism > Atheisms Origins

LINK TO THIS PAGE

rating : 0 | 0

Page 1 of 4

Topic:	Religions > Atheism
User:	"Atheist Bruiser"
Date:	26 Aug 2004 11:18:36 PM
Object:	Atheisms Origins

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C48BB2.3FC178A0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_001_000A_01C48BB2.3FC178A0"
------=_NextPart_001_000A_01C48BB2.3FC178A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
BlankTHE ORIGIN OF ATHEISM
Do you know that if you make an endeavor to find out when and by whom =
atheism was authored you will not be able to find such information from =
any source? Not even the most "educated" atheists - particularly those =
associated with the most elite universities throughout the world can =
truthfully inform you when and by whom atheism originated. They can =
enlighten you as to who were its main perpetuators in different =
cultures; but they cannot identify its founder and when it actually =
originated.=20
The absence of a known author and time of origin of such a highly =
embraced philosophy is a strange phenomenon. But this phenomenon is =
highly indicative. It suggests that atheism is not of earthly origin - =
that it had its birth in another sphere before this state of time. =
Atheism is not a manmade doctrine but a doctrine of the demons. Its =
originator is none other than the old serpent himself, namely, satan. It =
had its origin from the very one it deceptively denies exists. It is a =
doctrine which denies the authorship and existence of its own author! =
This accounts for the absence of information in any literature embraced =
by atheists that identify both a human author and earthly time of origin =
for atheism.=20
The process by which atheism originated was much more involved than can =
be explained here, so a simple presentation of the basic principles that =
gave it birth must suffice. I will endeavor to explain how atheism had =
its origin by first directing your attention to a principle in the Bible =
found in Romans Chapter 9, verse 14. The Holy Spirit who spoke through =
the pen of the Apostle Paul, drew a conclusion from what is presented in =
the previous verses. In the entire chapter, He teaches that God is =
sovereign over the salvation and reprobation of humans - that God does =
not love everybody - that He decreed that some should be the objects of =
His eternal love and the rest should be the objects of His eternal wrath =
- that God, from His own will, has mercy on some humans while He hardens =
the rest. He has done this apart from anything they do good or bad. He =
teaches that humans are not truly masters of their destinies, but God is =
- that the details of their lives and destinies were foreordained by God =
in eternity past - before He brought any of them into existence. Then He =
asked the question: "...There is no injustice with God, is there?" We =
are then very emphatically given the divine answer: "May it never be!"=20
The Holy Spirit implies from the question that graceless humans who are =
informed about the truths of God's sovereignty over the salvation and =
reprobation of humans will falsely conclude that God is unjust for =
loving some and hating the others - for decreeing that those He love =
should spend eternity in heaven and decreeing those He hates to spend =
eternity in the lake of fire, both apart fom anything they do good or =
bad in this world. A false conclusion that God is unjust for His actions =
is what began the birth process of atheism. It is very important to keep =
that fact in mind.=20
A conclusion that the Almighty Righteous God is unjust or wrong for any =
of His actions cannot be arrived at except through the total depravity =
of those who draw such a conclusion. So in order to understand how =
atheism had it origin, It is crucial to realize that the total depravity =
of the nature of satan is the key principle that underlies the origin of =
atheism. The total depravity of both the human and demonic natures is =
really none other than an antithetical principle or law to God and His =
Law. If you liken God and His righteousness to light and the total =
depravity of humans and demons to darkness, you can understand the =
antithetical nature of the two to one another. Light and darkness can =
never coexist; the one always dispels the other. Thus, the two are ANTI =
to one another. When the one expresses itself in the presence of the =
other, the other repels and cannot agree with the other, regardless of =
the expression. Atheism had its origin through the practical mental =
reaction of satan's depravity towards God's actions. The response of =
satan's depravity was the false conclusion that the actions of God are =
wrong or evil.=20
Even though the conclusion that God is unjust is high error and was =
known by satan to be so, his total depravity nevertheless made it =
impossible for him to conclude otherwise. Depravity must direct the =
hearts of its graceless subjects against God even though they know =
better. This is because of the very antithetical nature of depravity to =
God and His Law. The nature of both human and demonic depravity is an =
unvarying and uncompromising principle that works apart from what its =
subjects know and remains opposed to God at all times despite God's =
actions and despite their knowledge that it is impossible for God to be =
wrong.=20
The negative expressions of God towards the existence and outworkings of =
the depraved natures of humans and demons is always right, whereas the =
negative expressions and opposition of the depraved natures of humans =
and demons towards God are always wrong. The very antithetical nature of =
the depravity of graceless humans and demons invariably enslaves them to =
react negatively to God regardless of what God does. Therefore, their =
depravity reacts negatively to God, despite the fact that God can never =
do evil and despite the fact that He is always perfectly innocent. Here =
lies also the origin of insanity.=20
In order for satan to have arrived at the false conclusion that God is =
unjust in the midst of full knowledge that it is impossible for God to =
be so, his depravity had to cause him in principle to haughtily and =
deceptively seek to raise himself above God in order to judge God's =
actions. It was a haughty attempt of a measly, totally depraved creature =
to reduce the Almighty God to the level of a creature and to raise =
himself to the position of God in order to subject God's actions to his =
own judgement. It is impossible for the Almighty God to be debased to =
the level of a measly, depraved creature; and it is just as impossible =
for a measly, totally depraved creature to be exhalted to the level of =
the Almighty God. Satan understood this very well. However, his =
depravity nevertheless made him endeavor to assume such a deceptive =
role.=20
In order for satan to have endeavored to judge God, there had to be in =
place some type of opinion, philosophy, religion, charter or law by =
which he used to try to judge God. But God is not subject to anything. =
Nothing exists whatsoever that God is subject to or responsible to obey. =
God is not subject even to the most noble law in the universe - the TEN =
COMMANDMENTS - which He made for mankind, nor to any law made for the =
angels. He is above all laws and does only His own will. So there is no =
law He can possibly violate by any of His actions. Therefore, He cannot =
be rightly judged to be wrong in any action He performs. The only =
choices satan had by which to seek to judge God were some form of his =
own depravity - the antithetical principle of evil - the law of sin, or =
the most noble Law in the universe - the TEN COMMANDMENTS. Either choice =
would be the evil one attempting to judge the Righteous One - evil =
trying to condemn the rightousness as being evil - an impossibility and =
absolute deception. But he probably chose the latter so as to make God =
deceptively appear wrong by His own Law. Again, an impossibility and =
absolute deception.=20
Once satan deceptively drew the conclusion that God is wrong, the =
inference created within him a deep, abiding but unjust hatred and wrath =
for God. The ultimate end of all hatred is the death or complete =
destruction of the object of hatred. The hatred that satan had for God =
was not satisfied with merely seeking to punish God. It was satisfied =
with nothing less than God's annihilation.=20
But satan's foolish wrath created huge dilemmas for him. Although he =
wrongly concluded that God is unjust and wanted God annihilated as a =
result, he also clearly understood that it is impossible for God to be =
subject to his or anyone's feelings, opinions, religions, philosophies, =
charters or laws, or any law God has made. But he was nevertheless =
forced by his depravity to make a condemning judgement against God which =
sought God's annihilation. (A condemning judgement against God in the =
midst of the absence of a law that can condemn Him is insane hatred pure =
and simple.) But then he was faced with his knowledge that it is =
impossible for God to be destroyed by anyone, any means or anything. But =
his depravity and insane hatred for God insisted that God be =
annihilated! The dilemmas only served to inflame his foolish wrath. So =
after ranting and raving to no effect, the only way possible for him to =
gain some satisfaction from his rage and a semblance of the destruction =
of God in the midst of his understanding that God cannot be annihilated =
was through deception. He had to begin to deny the existence of God in =
full knowledge of His existence. This was the actual deceptive and =
utterly foolish birth of atheism.=20
The birth of atheism deceptively made satan feel free from his =
responsibility to obey and worship God, even though he also knew he =
wasn't free. It made him deceptively feel he had the freedom to think =
and speak whatever he wanted without the feeling that it was sin, even =
though he knew this was not so. It made him deceptively feel that there =
is no punishment from God awaiting him, even though he knows full well =
there is. With God supposedly out of the picture, satan could establish =
all of the various erroneous manmade and demonic philosophies, =
religions, opinions and etc. in the world and none of them would be =
wrong in the eyes of his atheism. Democracy could be established to give =
all these the right of existence. Hence the birth of demonic democracy.=20
Lets recount the demonic steps that led to the birth of atheism: First =
came the measly and totally depraved demon's deceptive efforts to exhalt =
himself to the level of the Almighty God and his deceptive efforts to =
debase God to the level of a depraved creature. Second came his =
deceptive efforts to judge God's actions by the demon's own depravity or =
by the law God made for human or angels. Third came the demon's deceived =
conclusion that God is unjust or wrong in what He does. Fourth came his =
deceptive effort to impose the sentence of annihilation upon God's =
existence. And fifth came the deceptive denial of the existence of God =
as a substitute for an impossibe annihilation of God. As you can see, =
each step from beginning to end during the birth of atheism was pure =
deception on the part of one who knows the truth. This proves that =
atheism is pure deception.=20
You will find those five principles at work in the hearts of every =
atheist. The conclusion that the One and only True God doesn't exist =
cannot be derived except through deception. Atheism didn't receive its =
origin by a true absence of proof of God's existence, because there has =
always been and always will be overwhelming proof to the contrary. =
Atheism had its origin by the expression of satan's depravity towards =
God, and it is embraced, maintained and perpetuated among graceless =
humans as a result of their total depravity. In other words, atheists =
follow in the footsteps of their master, the devil.=20
It was pointed out earlier that "The negative expression and opposition =
of the depraved natures of humans and demons towards God in regards to =
any of His actions are always wrong". It can't be any other way, because =
God is perfectly holy and therefore incapable of performing evil in any =
of His actions. Thus, in every case wherein humans or demons judge God =
to be wrong, it is done through the total depravity and deep hatred of =
those who are evil and already condemned because of being evil. Evil can =
never rightly condemn the righteous or the innocent. Any attempt to do =
is nothing but injustce. The perfect holines of God, His inability to =
sin and the impossibility of any creature or thing to condemn Him is =
clearly understood by those who express their foolish wrath towards God. =
This understanding adds to the heinousness of atheism. Atheism was born =
out of the deep depravity and deceptive wrath of the lowest creature =
that ever existed. His anger towards God amounts to a deep desire to =
murder the Most High God, to get rid of all righteousness and establish =
evil as if it is good - in the midst of his knowledge that such is =
impossible. Thus, the wrath that he has towards God - his desire to =
murder and annihilate Him, has fallen on his own head. That is, the deep =
wrath of the Almighty God is upon him. He cannot carry out his wrath =
upon God, but there is nothing that can stop God from pouring out His =
wrath upon him. All who are of like mind as satan - who embrace his =
atheism also has the wrath of the Almighty God against them. If God =
doesn't grant them His grace, they shall suffer eternal punishment in =
the lake of fire with satan. "...There is no injustice with God, is =
there? May it never be!"=20
--=20
Celebrating the stupidity of Atheists
Information tostimulate your rational mind
www.atheistfools.com
------=_NextPart_001_000A_01C48BB2.3FC178A0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE id=3DridTitle>Blank</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dwindows-1252"><BASE=20
href=3D"file://C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft =
Shared\Stationery\">
<STYLE>BODY {
MARGIN-TOP: 25px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 25px; COLOR: #000000; =
FONT-FAMILY: Arial, Helvetica
}
P.msoNormal {
MARGIN-TOP: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; COLOR: #ffffcc; =
FONT-FAMILY: Helvetica, "Times New Roman"
}
LI.msoNormal {
MARGIN-TOP: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; COLOR: #ffffcc; =
FONT-FAMILY: Helvetica, "Times New Roman"
}
</STYLE>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1458" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=3DridBody bgColor=3D#ffffff=20
background=3Dcid:000401c48bec$ec1eca00$0500a8c0@desktop>
<DIV>
THE ORIGIN OF ATHEISM
 
Do you know that if you make an endeavor to find out when and by whom =
atheism=20
was authored you will not be able to find such information from any =
source? Not=20
even the most "educated" atheists - particularly those associated with =
the most=20
elite universities throughout the world can truthfully inform you when =
and by=20
whom atheism originated. They can enlighten you as to who were its main=20
perpetuators in different cultures; but they cannot identify its founder =
and=20
when it actually originated. 
The absence of a known author and time of origin of such a highly =
embraced=20
philosophy is a strange phenomenon. But this phenomenon is highly =
indicative. It=20
suggests that atheism is not of earthly origin - that it had its birth =
in=20
another sphere before this state of time. Atheism is not a manmade =
doctrine but=20
a doctrine of the demons. Its originator is none other than the old =
serpent=20
himself, namely, satan. It had its origin from the very one it =
deceptively=20
denies exists. It is a doctrine which denies the authorship and =
existence of its=20
own author! This accounts for the absence of information in any =
literature=20
embraced by atheists that identify both a human author and earthly time =
of=20
origin for atheism. 
The process by which atheism originated was much more involved than =
can be=20
explained here, so a simple presentation of the basic principles that =
gave it=20
birth must suffice. I will endeavor to explain how atheism had its =
origin by=20
first directing your attention to a principle in the Bible found in =
Romans=20
Chapter 9, verse 14. The Holy Spirit who spoke through the pen of =
the=20
Apostle Paul, drew a conclusion from what is presented in the previous =
verses.=20
In the entire chapter, He teaches that God is sovereign over the =
salvation and=20
reprobation of humans - that God does not love everybody - that He =
decreed that=20
some should be the objects of His eternal love and the rest should be =
the=20
objects of His eternal wrath - that God, from His own will, has mercy on =
some=20
humans while He hardens the rest. He has done this apart from anything =
they do=20
good or bad. He teaches that humans are not truly masters of their =
destinies,=20
but God is - that the details of their lives and destinies were =
foreordained by=20
God in eternity past - before He brought any of them into existence. =
Then He=20
asked the question: "...There is no injustice with God, is =
there?" We are=20
then very emphatically given the divine answer: "May it never =
be!" 
The Holy Spirit implies from the question that graceless humans who =
are=20
informed about the truths of God's sovereignty over the salvation and=20
reprobation of humans will falsely conclude that God is unjust for =
loving some=20
and hating the others - for decreeing that those He love should spend =
eternity=20
in heaven and decreeing those He hates to spend eternity in the lake of =
fire,=20
both apart fom anything they do good or bad in this world. A false =
conclusion=20
that God is unjust for His actions is what began the birth process of =
atheism.=20
It is very important to keep that fact in mind. 
A conclusion that the Almighty Righteous God is unjust or wrong =
for any of=20
His actions cannot be arrived at except through the total depravity of =
those who=20
draw such a conclusion. So in order to understand how atheism had it =
origin, It=20
is crucial to realize that the total depravity of the nature of satan is =
the key=20
principle that underlies the origin of atheism. The total depravity =
of both=20
the human and demonic natures is really none other than an antithetical=20
principle or law to God and His Law. If you liken God and His =
righteousness to=20
light and the total depravity of humans and demons to darkness, you can=20
understand the antithetical nature of the two to one another. Light and =
darkness=20
can never coexist; the one always dispels the other. Thus, the two are =
ANTI to=20
one another. When the one expresses itself in the presence of the other, =
the=20
other repels and cannot agree with the other, regardless of the =
expression.=20
Atheism had its origin through the practical mental reaction of satan's=20
depravity towards God's actions. The response of satan's depravity was =
the false=20
conclusion that the actions of God are wrong or evil. 
Even though the conclusion that God is unjust is high error and was =
known by=20
satan to be so, his total depravity nevertheless made it impossible for =
him to=20
conclude otherwise. Depravity must direct the hearts of its graceless =
subjects against God even though they know better. This is because =
of the=20
very antithetical nature of depravity to God and His Law. The nature of =
both=20
human and demonic depravity is an unvarying and uncompromising principle =
that=20
works apart from what its subjects know and remains opposed to God at =
all times=20
despite God's actions and despite their knowledge that it is impossible =
for God=20
to be wrong. 
The negative expressions of God towards the existence and outworkings =
of the=20
depraved natures of humans and demons is always right, whereas =
the=20
negative expressions and opposition of the depraved natures of humans =
and demons=20
towards God are always wrong. The very antithetical nature of the =
depravity of graceless humans and demons invariably enslaves them to =
react=20
negatively to God regardless of what God does. Therefore, their =
depravity reacts=20
negatively to God, despite the fact that God can never do evil and =
despite the=20
fact that He is always perfectly innocent. Here lies also the origin =
of=20
insanity. 
In order for satan to have arrived at the false conclusion that God =
is unjust=20
in the midst of full knowledge that it is impossible for God to be so, =
his=20
depravity had to cause him in principle to haughtily and deceptively =
seek to=20
raise himself above God in order to judge God's actions. It was a =
haughty=20
attempt of a measly, totally depraved creature to reduce the Almighty =
God to the=20
level of a creature and to raise himself to the position of God in order =
to=20
subject God's actions to his own judgement. It is impossible for the =
Almighty=20
God to be debased to the level of a measly, depraved creature; and it is =
just as=20
impossible for a measly, totally depraved creature to be exhalted to the =
level=20
of the Almighty God. Satan understood this very well. However, his =
depravity=20
nevertheless made him endeavor to assume such a deceptive role. 
In order for satan to have endeavored to judge God, there had to be =
in place=20
some type of opinion, philosophy, religion, charter or law by which he =
used to=20
try to judge God. But God is not subject to anything. Nothing exists=20
whatsoever that God is subject to or responsible to obey. God is not =
subject=20
even to the most noble law in the universe - the TEN COMMANDMENTS - =
which He=20
made for mankind, nor to any law made for the angels. He is above all =
laws and=20
does only His own will. So there is no law He can possibly violate by =
any of His=20
actions. Therefore, He cannot be rightly judged to be wrong in any =
action He=20
performs. The only choices satan had by which to seek to judge God were =
some=20
form of his own depravity - the antithetical principle of evil - the law =
of sin,=20
or the most noble Law in the universe - the TEN COMMANDMENTS. Either =
choice=20
would be the evil one attempting to judge the Righteous One - evil =
trying to=20
condemn the rightousness as being evil - an impossibility and absolute=20
deception. But he probably chose the latter so as to make God =
deceptively appear=20
wrong by His own Law. Again, an impossibility and absolute deception. =

Once satan deceptively drew the conclusion that God is wrong, the =
inference=20
created within him a deep, abiding but unjust hatred and wrath for God. =
The=20
ultimate end of all hatred is the death or complete destruction of the =
object of=20
hatred. The hatred that satan had for God was not satisfied with merely =
seeking=20
to punish God. It was satisfied with nothing less than God's =
annihilation. 
But satan's foolish wrath created huge dilemmas for him. Although he =
wrongly=20
concluded that God is unjust and wanted God annihilated as a result, he =
also=20
clearly understood that it is impossible for God to be subject to his or =
anyone's feelings, opinions, religions, philosophies, charters or laws, =
or any=20
law God has made. But he was nevertheless forced by his depravity to =
make a=20
condemning judgement against God which sought God's annihilation. (A=20
condemning judgement against God in the midst of the absence of a law =
that can=20
condemn Him is insane hatred pure and simple.) But then he was faced =
with=20
his knowledge that it is impossible for God to be destroyed by anyone, =
any means=20
or anything. But his depravity and insane hatred for God insisted that =
God be=20
annihilated! The dilemmas only served to inflame his foolish wrath. So =
after=20
ranting and raving to no effect, the only way possible for him to gain =
some=20
satisfaction from his rage and a semblance of the destruction of God in =
the=20
midst of his understanding that God cannot be annihilated was through=20
deception. He had to begin to deny the existence of God in full =
knowledge=20
of His existence. This was the actual deceptive and utterly foolish =
birth of=20
atheism. 
The birth of atheism deceptively made satan feel free from his =
responsibility=20
to obey and worship God, even though he also knew he wasn't free. It =
made him=20
deceptively feel he had the freedom to think and speak whatever he =
wanted=20
without the feeling that it was sin, even though he knew this was not =
so. It=20
made him deceptively feel that there is no punishment from God awaiting =
him,=20
even though he knows full well there is. With God supposedly out of the =
picture,=20
satan could establish all of the various erroneous manmade and demonic=20
philosophies, religions, opinions and etc. in the world and none of them =
would=20
be wrong in the eyes of his atheism. Democracy could be established to =
give all=20
these the right of existence. Hence the birth of demonic =
democracy. 
Lets recount the demonic steps that led to the birth of atheism: =
First came=20
the measly and totally depraved demon's deceptive efforts to exhalt =
himself to=20
the level of the Almighty God and his deceptive efforts to debase God to =
the=20
level of a depraved creature. Second came his deceptive efforts to judge =
God's=20
actions by the demon's own depravity or by the law God made for human or =
angels.=20
Third came the demon's deceived conclusion that God is unjust or wrong =
in what=20
He does. Fourth came his deceptive effort to impose the sentence of =
annihilation=20
upon God's existence. And fifth came the deceptive denial of the =
existence of=20
God as a substitute for an impossibe annihilation of God. As you can =
see, each=20
step from beginning to end during the birth of atheism was pure =
deception on=20
the part of one who knows the truth. This proves that atheism is pure=20
deception. 
You will find those five principles at work in the hearts of every =
atheist.=20
The conclusion that the One and only True God doesn't exist cannot be =
derived=20
except through deception. Atheism didn't receive its origin by a true =
absence=20
of proof of God's existence, because there has always been and always =
will be=20
overwhelming proof to the contrary. Atheism had its origin by the =
expression=20
of satan's depravity towards God, and it is embraced, maintained and =
perpetuated=20
among graceless humans as a result of their total depravity. In other =
words,=20
atheists follow in the footsteps of their master, the devil. 
It was pointed out earlier that "The negative expression and =
opposition of=20
the depraved natures of humans and demons towards God in regards to any =
of His=20
actions are always wrong". It can't be any other way, because God =
is=20
perfectly holy and therefore incapable of performing evil in any of His=20
actions. Thus, in every case wherein humans or demons judge God to =
be wrong,=20
it is done through the total depravity and deep hatred of those who are =
evil and=20
already condemned because of being evil. Evil can never rightly condemn =
the=20
righteous or the innocent. Any attempt to do is nothing but injustce. =
The=20
perfect holines of God, His inability to sin and the impossibility of =
any=20
creature or thing to condemn Him is clearly understood by those who =
express=20
their foolish wrath towards God. This understanding adds to the =
heinousness of=20
atheism. Atheism was born out of the deep depravity and deceptive wrath =
of the=20
lowest creature that ever existed. His anger towards God amounts to a =
deep=20
desire to murder the Most High God, to get rid of all righteousness and=20
establish evil as if it is good - in the midst of his knowledge that =
such is=20
impossible. Thus, the wrath that he has towards God - his desire to =
murder and=20
annihilate Him, has fallen on his own head. That is, the deep wrath of =
the=20
Almighty God is upon him. He cannot carry out his wrath upon God, but =
there is=20
nothing that can stop God from pouring out His wrath upon him. All =
who are of=20
like mind as satan - who embrace his atheism also has the wrath of the =
Almighty=20
God against them. If God doesn't grant them His grace, they shall suffer =
eternal=20
punishment in the lake of fire with satan. "...There is no injustice =
with=20
God, is there? May it never be!" </DIV>
<DIV> -- Celebrating the stupidity of Atheists</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Information tostimulate your rational mind <A=20
href=3D"http://www.atheistfools.com">www.atheistfools.com</A></DIV>
 </BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_001_000A_01C48BB2.3FC178A0--
------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C48BB2.3FC178A0
Content-Type: image/gif;
name="Blank Bkgrd.gif"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-ID: <000401c48bec$ec1eca00$0500a8c0@desktop>
R0lGODlhLQAtAID/AP////f39ywAAAAALQAtAEACcAxup8vtvxKQsFon6d02898pGkgiYoCm6sq2
7iqWcmzOsmeXeA7uPJd5CYdD2g9oPF58ygqz+XhCG9JpJGmlYrPXGlfr/Yo/VW45e7amp2tou/lW
xo/zX513z+Vt+1n/tiX2pxP4NUhy2FM4xtjIUQAAOw==
------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C48BB2.3FC178A0--
.

User: "kathryn"
Title: Re: Atheisms Origins	27 Aug 2004 12:11:33 PM

Blank
"Atheist Bruiser" <AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> wrote in message
news:xCyXc.54$HM.13368@news.uswest.net...
THE ORIGIN OF ATHEISM
<snip>
Copy and paste is a wonderful invention isn't it.
.

User: "Atheist Bruiser"
Title: Re: Atheisms Origins	27 Aug 2004 10:54:56 PM

"kathryn" <bob@bob.com> wrote in message
news:cgnq05$m41$1@hercules.btinternet.com...

Blank
"Atheist Bruiser" <AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> wrote in message
news:xCyXc.54$HM.13368@news.uswest.net...
THE ORIGIN OF ATHEISM

<snip>

Copy and paste is a wonderful invention isn't it.

If your chief complaint is lack of *logic*, then you truly have no clue. I
have spent a few years studying logic in its various forms, you see -- I can
be accused of many things, but unfamiliarity with logic is not one of them.
You BTW should be aware
of the fact that you have repeatedly committed "no true scotsman" and "ad
hominem" fallacies (and no, "argumentum as hominem" is *not* the same as
personal attack or insult).
Of course, you don't *mean* to say that I am unfamiliar with logic; what you
meant was that you didn't like what I was saying, and you wanted to express
your emotional repulsion in intellectually respectable-seeming form. Sorry,
it won't fly; if you wish to claim that my arguments are irrational, you
will have to *prove* it, not just make a wild claim and prance away in
indignation. Simply lashing out emotionally and coaching your fear in
intellectual terms is not good enough.
.

User: "BMR"
Title: Re: Atheisms Origins	28 Aug 2004 05:02:46 AM

"Atheist Bruiser" <AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:jmTXc.58$h43.53866@news.uswest.net...
<snip all>
I see that after you descharged all your prime bias, you try a "reasonable"
approach. It is normal for any "person" whose mentality is based upon
ungrounded claims, to pass from an aggressive state to a "quiet" one after a
process of saturation, and specially after having been fooled around
fiercely; christians are very keen to this behavior, 'cause their
superstition is the most ungrounded and absurd of all.
--
B. Catalano
www.alexamenos.com
.

User: "BMR"
Title: Re: Atheisms Origins	28 Aug 2004 05:02:33 AM

"Atheist Bruiser" <AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:jmTXc.58$h43.53866@news.uswest.net...

If your chief complaint is lack of *logic*, then you truly have no clue. I
have spent a few years studying logic in its various forms, you see -- I

can
to "study" is a point; to apply it deontologically, is another.

be accused of many things, but unfamiliarity with logic is not one of

them.
so, show off the "logic" you was and were still using.

You BTW should be aware
of the fact that you have repeatedly committed "no true scotsman" and "ad
hominem" fallacies (and no, "argumentum as hominem" is *not* the same as
personal attack or insult).

this isn't "logic"; this is rather to be so laughable, to seem pitiful.

Of course, you don't *mean* to say that I am unfamiliar with logic; what

you

meant was that you didn't like what I was saying, and you wanted to

express

your emotional repulsion in intellectually respectable-seeming form.

show off the "respectable-seeming" form dwelling within your silly rants.
Sorry,

it won't fly; if you wish to claim that my arguments are irrational, you
will have to *prove* it, not just make a wild claim and prance away in
indignation. Simply lashing out emotionally and coaching your fear in
intellectual terms is not good enough.

then, show off the "logic" of your basic belief, which make you act like the
perfect prototype of an illucid *****. I know, when one is too certain of
his tenets, doesn't have anything to demonstrate to "inferior louts", whom
are unable to understand the "fine logic" of a triune deus ex who created
the cosmos from void. So, it is easier that these "geniuses" were much more
keen to start out with slanders, offenses and the like; with the only
results to appear nothing but a formatted idiot among whom already know what
you intend to be inerrant. Rationally speaking, you are nothing but a scope
for laughs you deserve.
--
B. Catalano
www.alexamenos.com
.

User: "Atheist Bruiser"
Title: Re: Atheisms Origins	29 Aug 2004 11:47:12 AM

"BMR" <blocktrap@alexamenos.com> wrote in message
news:ZKYXc.160907$OR2.7644483@news3.tin.it...

"Atheist Bruiser" <AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> ha scritto nel

messaggio

news:jmTXc.58$h43.53866@news.uswest.net...

If your chief complaint is lack of *logic*, then you truly have no clue.

have spent a few years studying logic in its various forms, you see -- I

can

to "study" is a point; to apply it deontologically, is another.

be accused of many things, but unfamiliarity with logic is not one of

them.

so, show off the "logic" you was and were still using.

You BTW should be aware
of the fact that you have repeatedly committed "no true scotsman" and

"ad

hominem" fallacies (and no, "argumentum as hominem" is *not* the same as
personal attack or insult).

this isn't "logic"; this is rather to be so laughable, to seem pitiful.

Of course, you don't *mean* to say that I am unfamiliar with logic; what

you

meant was that you didn't like what I was saying, and you wanted to

express

your emotional repulsion in intellectually respectable-seeming form.

show off the "respectable-seeming" form dwelling within your silly rants.

Sorry,

then, show off the "logic" of your basic belief, which make you act like

the

perfect prototype of an illucid *****. I know, when one is too certain

his tenets, doesn't have anything to demonstrate to "inferior louts", whom
are unable to understand the "fine logic" of a triune deus ex who created
the cosmos from void. So, it is easier that these "geniuses" were much

keen to start out with slanders, offenses and the like; with the only
results to appear nothing but a formatted idiot among whom already know

what

you intend to be inerrant. Rationally speaking, you are nothing but a

scope

for laughs you deserve.

--
B. Catalano
www.alexamenos.com

Oh look at this crap, the changing of the guards uses more pampers than the
queen does.
.

User: "kathryn"
Title: Re: Atheisms Origins	28 Aug 2004 07:05:23 AM

"Atheist Bruiser" <AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> wrote in message
news:jmTXc.58$h43.53866@news.uswest.net...

"kathryn" <bob@bob.com> wrote in message
news:cgnq05$m41$1@hercules.btinternet.com...

Blank
"Atheist Bruiser" <AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> wrote in message
news:xCyXc.54$HM.13368@news.uswest.net...
THE ORIGIN OF ATHEISM

<snip>

Copy and paste is a wonderful invention isn't it.

If your chief complaint is lack of *logic*, then you truly have no clue.

Yet you're the one who claims that those who by definition do not believe in
the existance of a god are always blaming/hating it. Now that is illogical.
.

User: "Pastor Dave"
Title: Re: Atheisms Origins	28 Aug 2004 07:20:36 AM

While skydiving off of the Empire State Building on
Sat, 28 Aug 2004 12:05:23 +0000 (UTC), "kathryn"
<bob@bob.com> screamed out:

"Atheist Bruiser" <AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> wrote in message
news:jmTXc.58$h43.53866@news.uswest.net...

"kathryn" <bob@bob.com> wrote in message
news:cgnq05$m41$1@hercules.btinternet.com...

Blank
"Atheist Bruiser" <AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> wrote in message
news:xCyXc.54$HM.13368@news.uswest.net...
THE ORIGIN OF ATHEISM

<snip>

Copy and paste is a wonderful invention isn't it.

If your chief complaint is lack of *logic*, then you truly have no clue.

Yet you're the one who claims that those who by definition do not believe in
the existance of a god are always blaming/hating it. Now that is illogical.

The illogic is on their part, since that's what they
do. I am currently involved in conversations with
three atheists who are doing exactly that.
--
Pastor Dave Raymond
"Were they ashamed when they made an abomination?
They were not at all ashamed, nor did they know
to blush. So they shall fall among those who fall.
At the time I visit them, they shall be cast down,
says Jehovah." - Jeremiah 6:15
"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17
/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\
God doesn't call the qualified; He qualifies the called.
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
.

User: "BMR"
Title: Re: Atheisms Origins	28 Aug 2004 08:42:43 AM

"Pastor Dave" <pastordave38@nospam-yahoo.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:g3u0j0tthcdviev1pfl9858fmhpv15c2n2@4ax.com...

The illogic is on their part, since that's what they
do. I am currently involved in conversations with
three atheists who are doing exactly that.

Clearly, this isn't a fallacy of generalisation, isn't?
--
B. Catalano
www.alexamenos.com
.

User: ""
Title: Re: Atheisms Origins	28 Aug 2004 10:02:55 PM

In talk.atheism Pastor Dave <pastordave38@nospam-yahoo.com> wrote:

While skydiving off of the Empire State Building on
Sat, 28 Aug 2004 12:05:23 +0000 (UTC), "kathryn"
<bob@bob.com> screamed out:

"Atheist Bruiser" <AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> wrote in message
news:jmTXc.58$h43.53866@news.uswest.net...

"kathryn" <bob@bob.com> wrote in message
news:cgnq05$m41$1@hercules.btinternet.com...

Blank
"Atheist Bruiser" <AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> wrote in message
news:xCyXc.54$HM.13368@news.uswest.net...
THE ORIGIN OF ATHEISM

<snip>

Copy and paste is a wonderful invention isn't it.

If your chief complaint is lack of *logic*, then you truly have no clue.

Yet you're the one who claims that those who by definition do not believe in
the existance of a god are always blaming/hating it. Now that is illogical.

The illogic is on their part, since that's what they
do. I am currently involved in conversations with
three atheists who are doing exactly that.

They don't believe in any god and yet they hate this same thing that they
don't believe in? Yeah, suuuUUUUuuurrreee (as I start looking up various
pshrinks' phone numbers to refer Dave to.)

--
Pastor Dave Raymond
"Were they ashamed when they made an abomination?
They were not at all ashamed, nor did they know
to blush. So they shall fall among those who fall.
At the time I visit them, they shall be cast down,
says Jehovah." - Jeremiah 6:15
"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17
/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\
God doesn't call the qualified; He qualifies the called.
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

--
Mike
W hat atheism: a non-prophet organization...
W ould
J enna
D rink?
-------------------------------
Creation Science: an oxymoron actually created by morons...
-------------------------------
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you
do criticize them, you're a mile away, and you have their shoes.
-------------------------------
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop
thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do
we," George W. "Shrub" Bush Aug 5, 2004
.

User: "kathryn"
Title: Re: Atheisms Origins	28 Aug 2004 06:56:34 AM

"Atheist Bruiser" <AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> wrote in message
news:jmTXc.58$h43.53866@news.uswest.net...

"kathryn" <bob@bob.com> wrote in message
news:cgnq05$m41$1@hercules.btinternet.com...

Blank
"Atheist Bruiser" <AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> wrote in message
news:xCyXc.54$HM.13368@news.uswest.net...
THE ORIGIN OF ATHEISM

<snip>

Copy and paste is a wonderful invention isn't it.

If your chief complaint is lack of *logic*, then you truly have no clue. I
have spent a few years studying logic in its various forms, you see -- I

can

be accused of many things, but unfamiliarity with logic is not one of

them.

You BTW should be aware
of the fact that you have repeatedly committed "no true scotsman" and "ad
hominem" fallacies (and no, "argumentum as hominem" is *not* the same as
personal attack or insult).
Of course, you don't *mean* to say that I am unfamiliar with logic; what

you

meant was that you didn't like what I was saying, and you wanted to

express

your emotional repulsion in intellectually respectable-seeming form.

Sorry,

So you're saying you didn't copy and paste it and it really is your own
work?
Right.
.

User: "John Ings"
Title: Re: Atheisms Origins	29 Aug 2004 08:18:09 AM

On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 11:56:34 +0000 (UTC), "kathryn" <bob@bob.com>
wrote:

So you're saying you didn't copy and paste it and it really is your own
work?

He copied it allright. It's from
http://www.tencommandments.org/heathens5.shtml
which seems to be down now but Google has it in cache.
## Faith proceeds from fear, by way of conceit, to hatred
.

User: "kathryn"
Title: Re: Atheisms Origins	30 Aug 2004 10:35:05 AM

"John Ings" <nodamned@spam.org> wrote in message
news:8ol3j0lsiau18kl9ph6o9o3mmmhcelq4bt@4ax.com...

On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 11:56:34 +0000 (UTC), "kathryn" <bob@bob.com>
wrote:

So you're saying you didn't copy and paste it and it really is your own
work?

He copied it allright. It's from
http://www.tencommandments.org/heathens5.shtml
which seems to be down now but Google has it in cache.

## Faith proceeds from fear, by way of conceit, to hatred

Yeah I was going to hit him with that if he'd tried to pretend it was his
own
Kathryn
.

User: "wbarwell"
Title: Re: Atheisms Origins	28 Aug 2004 09:27:51 AM

Atheist Bruiser wrote:

"kathryn" <bob@bob.com> wrote in message
news:cgnq05$m41$1@hercules.btinternet.com...

Blank
"Atheist Bruiser" <AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> wrote in message
news:xCyXc.54$HM.13368@news.uswest.net...
THE ORIGIN OF ATHEISM

<snip>

Copy and paste is a wonderful invention isn't it.

You seem to be about as logical as a hamster.
That is, not very.
You seem to do nothing but childish name calling
and ranting. The intellectual contents of the posts I
have seen of yours are very low.
--
Senator Waxman's searchable database of iraq war lies.
www.house.gov/reform/min/features/iraq_on_the_record/
A good portal to more lies and Bush stupidity is to be found at
www.failureisimpossible.com - Go to the index and go to
"L" for lies. All you need to know about Bush when you
step into the voting booth. Bush is a liar and surrounds
himself with fellow liars.
Cheerful Charlie
.

User: "raven1"
Title: Re: Atheisms Origins	27 Aug 2004 11:35:14 PM

On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 20:54:56 -0700, "Atheist Bruiser"
<AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> wrote:

"kathryn" <bob@bob.com> wrote in message
news:cgnq05$m41$1@hercules.btinternet.com...

Blank
"Atheist Bruiser" <AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> wrote in message
news:xCyXc.54$HM.13368@news.uswest.net...
THE ORIGIN OF ATHEISM

<snip>

Copy and paste is a wonderful invention isn't it.

You've yet to show it. In fact, you've yet to do anything other than
hurl unsupported insults.

You BTW should be aware
of the fact that you have repeatedly committed "no true scotsman" and "ad
hominem" fallacies

Citations or retraction, please.

(and no, "argumentum as hominem" is *not* the same as
personal attack or insult).

Very good. But I hope that you realize that when I say that you've
demonstrated yourself to be a nasty-minded cretin, it's neither an
insult nor an AAH, merely an observation...

Of course, you don't *mean* to say that I am unfamiliar with logic;

I think that's *exactly* what she meant to say, and as far as I can
see, it's likely true, otherwise you wouldn't be whacking so many
Strawmen in your posts.

what you
meant was that you didn't like what I was saying, and you wanted to express
your emotional repulsion in intellectually respectable-seeming form.

An entirely understandable response, considering the general vileness
of your posts.
BTW, you mean "revulsion", and your grammar is atrocious:
"intellectually respectable-seeming form" is one of the ugliest,
clunkiest bits of writing I've ever encountered. People who live in
glass houses...

Sorry,
it won't fly; if you wish to claim that my arguments are irrational, you
will have to *prove* it,

You've yet to advance an argument, and should you ever do so, the
burden of proof is on you to demonstrate it, not on anyone to refute
it.
..

not just make a wild claim and prance away in
indignation. Simply lashing out emotionally and coaching

You mean "couching".

your fear in
intellectual terms is not good enough.

I've yet to see you offer even one single logical argument. All you do
is toss off cheap and simple-minded insults.
Put your money where your mouth is. If you have anything rational to
say, please take this opportunity to offer it up. Otherwise, go away
and let the grown-ups talk amongst ourselves.
.

User: "Atheist Bruiser"
Title: Re: Atheisms Origins	29 Aug 2004 11:46:29 AM

"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:l530j0517tua5m6f3cgqsma7ff1divlq2g@4ax.com...

On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 20:54:56 -0700, "Atheist Bruiser"
<AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> wrote:

"kathryn" <bob@bob.com> wrote in message
news:cgnq05$m41$1@hercules.btinternet.com...

Blank
"Atheist Bruiser" <AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> wrote in message
news:xCyXc.54$HM.13368@news.uswest.net...
THE ORIGIN OF ATHEISM

<snip>

Copy and paste is a wonderful invention isn't it.

If your chief complaint is lack of *logic*, then you truly have no clue.

have spent a few years studying logic in its various forms, you see -- I

can

be accused of many things, but unfamiliarity with logic is not one of

them.

You've yet to show it. In fact, you've yet to do anything other than
hurl unsupported insults.

You BTW should be aware
of the fact that you have repeatedly committed "no true scotsman" and "ad
hominem" fallacies

Citations or retraction, please.

(and no, "argumentum as hominem" is *not* the same as
personal attack or insult).

Very good. But I hope that you realize that when I say that you've
demonstrated yourself to be a nasty-minded cretin, it's neither an
insult nor an AAH, merely an observation...

Of course, you don't *mean* to say that I am unfamiliar with logic;

I think that's *exactly* what she meant to say, and as far as I can
see, it's likely true, otherwise you wouldn't be whacking so many
Strawmen in your posts.

what you
meant was that you didn't like what I was saying, and you wanted to

express

your emotional repulsion in intellectually respectable-seeming form.

An entirely understandable response, considering the general vileness
of your posts.

BTW, you mean "revulsion", and your grammar is atrocious:
"intellectually respectable-seeming form" is one of the ugliest,
clunkiest bits of writing I've ever encountered. People who live in
glass houses...

Sorry,
it won't fly; if you wish to claim that my arguments are irrational, you
will have to *prove* it,

You've yet to advance an argument, and should you ever do so, the
burden of proof is on you to demonstrate it, not on anyone to refute
it.
.

not just make a wild claim and prance away in
indignation. Simply lashing out emotionally and coaching

You mean "couching".

your fear in
intellectual terms is not good enough.

I've yet to see you offer even one single logical argument. All you do
is toss off cheap and simple-minded insults.

Put your money where your mouth is. If you have anything rational to
say, please take this opportunity to offer it up. Otherwise, go away
and let the grown-ups talk amongst ourselves.

I meant *COACHING*which btw still further the argument that you are a fool.
Learn proper grammar monkey before you attempt to slam your superiors.
Your rebuttal is one of the most incoherent offerings I've heard this year.
Not only does it make no sense, its dizzying in its misuse and massacre of
the english language!
For anything to occur, one has to be able to decipher what the hell it is,
you're trying to say. And since you obviously have zero idea how to use the
words you're attempting to impress me with, you may as well give up this
charade
of "intelligence" and revert back to your native Mongoloid. At least by
using language you're familiar with, you can get your point across.
.

User: "Neil Kelsey"
Title: Re: Atheisms Origins	29 Aug 2004 01:58:04 PM

not just make a wild claim and prance away in
indignation. Simply lashing out emotionally and coaching
your fear in intellectual terms is not good enough.

You mean "couching".

I meant *COACHING*which btw still further the argument that you are a
fool.
Learn proper grammar monkey before you attempt to slam your superiors.
Your rebuttal is one of the most incoherent offerings I've heard this
year.
Not only does it make no sense, its dizzying in its misuse and massacre of
the english language!
For anything to occur, one has to be able to decipher what the hell it is,
you're trying to say. And since you obviously have zero idea how to use
the
words you're attempting to impress me with, you may as well give up this
charade
of "intelligence" and revert back to your native Mongoloid. At least by
using language you're familiar with, you can get your point across.

You're a liar. You meant to use a common English phrase (the one with
"couching" as a verb) and you botched it up. I noticed it too, didn't
particularly care since I knew what you meant, but now you're being
intellectually dishonest. And abusive. Again, what are you trying to
accomplish here? If you're celebrating the stupidity of atheists, it's
backfiring.
.

User: "Eric Root"
Title: Re: Atheisms Origins	29 Aug 2004 10:50:42 PM

Atheist Bruiser wrote:

"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:l530j0517tua5m6f3cgqsma7ff1divlq2g@4ax.com...

On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 20:54:56 -0700, "Atheist Bruiser"
<AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> wrote:

"kathryn" <bob@bob.com> wrote in message
news:cgnq05$m41$1@hercules.btinternet.com...

Blank
"Atheist Bruiser" <AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> wrote in message
news:xCyXc.54$HM.13368@news.uswest.net...
THE ORIGIN OF ATHEISM

<snip>

Copy and paste is a wonderful invention isn't it.

If your chief complaint is lack of *logic*, then you truly have no clue.

have spent a few years studying logic in its various forms, you see -- I

can

be accused of many things, but unfamiliarity with logic is not one of

them.

You've yet to show it. In fact, you've yet to do anything other than
hurl unsupported insults.

You BTW should be aware
of the fact that you have repeatedly committed "no true scotsman" and "ad
hominem" fallacies

Citations or retraction, please.

(and no, "argumentum as hominem" is *not* the same as
personal attack or insult).

Very good. But I hope that you realize that when I say that you've
demonstrated yourself to be a nasty-minded cretin, it's neither an
insult nor an AAH, merely an observation...

Of course, you don't *mean* to say that I am unfamiliar with logic;

I think that's *exactly* what she meant to say, and as far as I can
see, it's likely true, otherwise you wouldn't be whacking so many
Strawmen in your posts.

what you
meant was that you didn't like what I was saying, and you wanted to

express

your emotional repulsion in intellectually respectable-seeming form.

An entirely understandable response, considering the general vileness
of your posts.

BTW, you mean "revulsion", and your grammar is atrocious:
"intellectually respectable-seeming form" is one of the ugliest,
clunkiest bits of writing I've ever encountered. People who live in
glass houses...

Sorry,
it won't fly; if you wish to claim that my arguments are irrational, you
will have to *prove* it,

You've yet to advance an argument, and should you ever do so, the
burden of proof is on you to demonstrate it, not on anyone to refute
it.
.

not just make a wild claim and prance away in
indignation. Simply lashing out emotionally and coaching

You mean "couching".

your fear in
intellectual terms is not good enough.

I've yet to see you offer even one single logical argument. All you do
is toss off cheap and simple-minded insults.

Put your money where your mouth is. If you have anything rational to
say, please take this opportunity to offer it up. Otherwise, go away
and let the grown-ups talk amongst ourselves.

Wow, _that_ was world-class lame. I didn't even know it was even
_possible_ to be that lame. Do you give lessons?
.

User: "raven1"
Title: Re: Atheisms Origins	29 Aug 2004 03:01:31 PM

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 09:46:29 -0700, "Atheist Bruiser"
<AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> wrote:

"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:l530j0517tua5m6f3cgqsma7ff1divlq2g@4ax.com...

On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 20:54:56 -0700, "Atheist Bruiser"
<AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> wrote:

not just make a wild claim and prance away in
indignation. Simply lashing out emotionally and coaching

You mean "couching".

your fear in
intellectual terms is not good enough.

I've yet to see you offer even one single logical argument. All you do
is toss off cheap and simple-minded insults.

Put your money where your mouth is. If you have anything rational to
say, please take this opportunity to offer it up. Otherwise, go away
and let the grown-ups talk amongst ourselves.

I meant *COACHING*

Wow. I mean, *wow*.
You do realize that you just as well might have written "I meant I am
a semi-literate imbecile", don't you?
Wow.
.

User: "Atheist Bruiser"
Title: Re: Atheisms Origins	29 Aug 2004 10:42:21 PM

"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:55d4j0tlvv2fn1cj59t79k98aepd1p4nnp@4ax.com...

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 09:46:29 -0700, "Atheist Bruiser"
<AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> wrote:

"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:l530j0517tua5m6f3cgqsma7ff1divlq2g@4ax.com...

On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 20:54:56 -0700, "Atheist Bruiser"
<AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> wrote:

not just make a wild claim and prance away in
indignation. Simply lashing out emotionally and coaching

You mean "couching".

your fear in
intellectual terms is not good enough.

I've yet to see you offer even one single logical argument. All you do
is toss off cheap and simple-minded insults.

Put your money where your mouth is. If you have anything rational to
say, please take this opportunity to offer it up. Otherwise, go away
and let the grown-ups talk amongst ourselves.

I meant *COACHING*

Wow. I mean, *wow*.

You do realize that you just as well might have written "I meant I am
a semi-literate imbecile", don't you?

Wow.

Even the most annoying posts by you are no match for the obvious male
falsettos, and insipid music score. Nuff said.
.

User: "raven1"
Title: Re: Atheisms Origins	30 Aug 2004 02:29:53 PM

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 20:42:21 -0700, "Atheist Bruiser"
<AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> wrote:

"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:55d4j0tlvv2fn1cj59t79k98aepd1p4nnp@4ax.com...

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 09:46:29 -0700, "Atheist Bruiser"
<AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> wrote:

"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:l530j0517tua5m6f3cgqsma7ff1divlq2g@4ax.com...

On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 20:54:56 -0700, "Atheist Bruiser"
<AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> wrote:

not just make a wild claim and prance away in
indignation. Simply lashing out emotionally and coaching

You mean "couching".

your fear in
intellectual terms is not good enough.

I've yet to see you offer even one single logical argument. All you do
is toss off cheap and simple-minded insults.

Put your money where your mouth is. If you have anything rational to
say, please take this opportunity to offer it up. Otherwise, go away
and let the grown-ups talk amongst ourselves.

I meant *COACHING*

Wow. I mean, *wow*.

You do realize that you just as well might have written "I meant I am
a semi-literate imbecile", don't you?

Wow.

Even the most annoying posts by you are no match for the obvious male
falsettos, and insipid music score. Nuff said.

WTF are you babbling about, oh semi-literate imbecile?
.

User: "Atheist Bruiser"
Title: Re: Atheisms Origins	30 Aug 2004 08:57:16 PM

"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:be07j0l4d40vn8o5kv2jtq85pf8mmu4rqm@4ax.com...

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 20:42:21 -0700, "Atheist Bruiser"
<AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> wrote:

"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:55d4j0tlvv2fn1cj59t79k98aepd1p4nnp@4ax.com...

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 09:46:29 -0700, "Atheist Bruiser"
<AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> wrote:

"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:l530j0517tua5m6f3cgqsma7ff1divlq2g@4ax.com...

On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 20:54:56 -0700, "Atheist Bruiser"
<AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> wrote:

not just make a wild claim and prance away in
indignation. Simply lashing out emotionally and coaching

You mean "couching".

your fear in
intellectual terms is not good enough.

I've yet to see you offer even one single logical argument. All you

is toss off cheap and simple-minded insults.

Put your money where your mouth is. If you have anything rational to
say, please take this opportunity to offer it up. Otherwise, go away
and let the grown-ups talk amongst ourselves.

I meant *COACHING*

Wow. I mean, *wow*.

You do realize that you just as well might have written "I meant I am
a semi-literate imbecile", don't you?

Wow.

Even the most annoying posts by you are no match for the obvious male
falsettos, and insipid music score. Nuff said.

WTF are you babbling about, oh semi-literate imbecile?

Good God! Why don't modems come with mandatory IQ testing? Really, I should
sue modem manufacturers for the damage inflicted on my IQ by having to read
your garbage. That being said, let's address your 'problem.' Basically, you
are overly-sensitive to superiority of others. In words you cannot
understand without tilting your head, straining to see your screen, and
mouthing the words: you need to firm up.
.

User: "raven1"
Title: Re: Atheisms Origins	31 Aug 2004 06:10:47 AM

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 18:57:16 -0700, "Atheist Bruiser"
<AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> wrote:

"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:be07j0l4d40vn8o5kv2jtq85pf8mmu4rqm@4ax.com...

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 20:42:21 -0700, "Atheist Bruiser"
<AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> wrote:

"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:55d4j0tlvv2fn1cj59t79k98aepd1p4nnp@4ax.com...

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 09:46:29 -0700, "Atheist Bruiser"
<AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> wrote:

"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:l530j0517tua5m6f3cgqsma7ff1divlq2g@4ax.com...

On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 20:54:56 -0700, "Atheist Bruiser"
<AtheistBruiser@Intelligence.com> wrote:

not just make a wild claim and prance away in
indignation. Simply lashing out emotionally and coaching

You mean "couching".

your fear in
intellectual terms is not good enough.

I've yet to see you offer even one single logical argument. All you

I meant *COACHING*

Wow. I mean, *wow*.

You do realize that you just as well might have written "I meant I am
a semi-literate imbecile", don't you?

Wow.

Even the most annoying posts by you are no match for the obvious male
falsettos, and insipid music score. Nuff said.

WTF are you babbling about, oh semi-literate imbecile?

Good God! Why don't modems come with mandatory IQ testing?

Because you'd be banned from posting.
.

User: "Atheist Bruiser"
Title: Re: Atheisms Origins	31 Aug 2004 08:46:40 PM

"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:gin8j0h11ut25vol9fiuhk9iipo60j63aa@4ax.com...