On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:30:38 -0700, veritas <khogan...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

I don't feel much like arguing today. On the twelveth hold, i
stepped into a sand bunker and twisted my ancle. the Ecobioloisgists
argured what whould have happened in the few inches of birth canal
that would make a fetus special from a new born? In other words
infanticide is just a worthy as before birth. I'm quoting the
professors now not me.

Abortions in the 9th month of pregnancy are almost ALWAYS to save the
woman's life or to remove a dead fetus, but it's standard dead-brain
policy to equate "abortion" with "viable child and trouble-free
pregnancy", so I'm not in the least surprised. That they would say it
or that you would use it.

On Aug 20, 11:45 pm, veritas <khogan...@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Aug 20, 6:30 pm, Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net> wrote:

On Aug 19, 10:53 pm, veritas <khogan...@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Aug 19, 10:41 pm, Al Klein <ruk...@pern.invalid> wrote:

On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 19:23:39 -0700, veritas <khogan...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

Michael Gray doesn't contribute much to any conversation. He is more
into insulting people on the net.

He contributes a lot. He only insults those who require insulting,
mainly those who, though probably capable of thought, refuse to think.

He is for the most part insulting when proved wrong. Where I come
from we don't call people names over a forum, if we have the guts to
call people names we say it to their faces. A practice that escapes
our subject. While you and I have a difference of opinion about a
statement I call no one names.

You're calling a "fetus" or an "embryo" an "infant". What could be
more inappropriate than that?! You seriously need to watch what you
say.

This is an atheist forum. We're far more into accuracy and precision
than any theist fora can pretend to be. If you persist in using
inappropriate terminology in trying to make a case for something after
you've been advised of your faults, you *will* be insulted here. It's
a fact of life.

We do not suffer idiots lightly. We don't suffer them at all. If you
persist in mislabeling, *you* will be labeled.

That is like carrying an umbrella,
certain people do that. Nonetheless, I have been called a liar
several times (Not by you) when in fact I am using a time tested way
of thinking called logic.

What logic is there in persistently misrepresenting a position when
you've been advised of your mistake repeatedly and yet you cannot seem
to find the intellectual integrity to address the problem?

It gets to our subject sometimes, and he
resorts to curse words or name calling. So uneccessary, as we are not
going to save the world on here at any rate.

We're not saving the world. We *are* preserving our corner of it.

But, in my opinion, one
should never insult another on here because of a disagreement.

There's no disagreement. We all agree that you're inflaming a
situation unnecessarily by misusing terminology. I'm sorry you're
incapable of grasping that.

Budikka- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What you don't suffer is someone with their heads screwed on
straight.

Some who deliberately and persistently misuses words has their head
screwed on straight? LoL!

That is what you don't suffer. If you can't see the
illogic of the rape-lovemaking statement, there is nothing I can do to
help you, you need education in logical thinking.

I never said I didn't understand it, I said I had not been in on that
so I couldn't comment. If you cannot tell the difference, you're
seriously in need of a reality adjustment.

Again, what's evident here is that you're deliberately obfuscating the
situation. What you are is dishonest. That's a fact and I've
demonstrated this more than once now, a fact which you have yet to
even acknowledge, let alone begun to address.

Of course it couldn't *possibly* be *you* who has misunderstood the
comparison, could it now?

You seem to be
incapable of grasping that the statement will not work logically, with
or without my statement. Ken

You are incapable of understanding an example, a comparison designed
to show you how inappropriate your choice of words has been. When are
*you* going to acknowledge *that* and deal with it?

Or are you simply dishonest and arrogant?

Budikka- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What you don't suffer is someone with their heads screwed on
straight. That is what you don't suffer. If you can't see the
illogic of the rape-lovemaking statement

there is nothing I can do to
help you, you need education in logical thinking. You seem to be
incapable of grasping that the statement will not work logically, with
or without my statement.

On Aug 19, 10:41 pm, Al Klein <ruk...@pern.invalid> wrote:

On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 19:23:39 -0700, veritas <khogan...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

Michael Gray doesn't contribute much to any conversation. He is more
into insulting people on the net.

He contributes a lot. He only insults those who require insulting,
mainly those who, though probably capable of thought, refuse to think.

He is for the most part insulting when proved wrong.

Where I come from we don't call people names over a forum

Nonetheless, I have been called a liar
several times (Not by you) when in fact I am using a time tested way
of thinking called logic.

It gets to our subject sometimes, and he
resorts to curse words or name calling.

But, in my opinion, one
should never insult another on here because of a disagreement.

Michael Gray doesn't contribute much to any conversation. He is more
into insulting people on the net. Ken