| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
28 Oct 2005 09:36:26 PM |
| Object: |
Atheist Religion |
It doesn't get any more hypocritical than this. How are people supposed to
take anything an atheist says seriously?
http://www.phxnews.com/fullstory.php?article=26321
7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals: Atheism as a Religion
In a correctional facilities case, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
ruled Aug. 19, 2005 that atheism should be considered a religion under the
law and the facilities may not prevent groups of prisoners from forming
groups to study atheism.
In its decision, the court reasoned that preventing these meetings would
infringe upon the inmates' First Amendment right to freely exercise their
religion. The court said, "Atheism is [the inmate's] religion, and the group
that he wanted to start was religious in nature even though it expressly
rejects a belief in a supreme being."
Claiming atheism to be a religion
Some atheist have established and started a number of atheistic churches,
such as the Naturalistic Pantheists, Brianism, the church of Reality, and
the Fellowship of Reason. There is also a significant atheist presence in
Unitarian Universalism religion, and Michael Newdow's Church of the First
Amendment, to name a few.
--
*****************************************
Science is organized knowledge. Wisdom is organized life.
.
|
|
| User: "Mark" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist Religion |
28 Oct 2005 10:10:17 PM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in
news:rtydnfSwjOQhff_eRVn-vQ@giganews.com:
It doesn't get any more hypocritical than this. How are people
supposed to take anything an atheist says seriously?
don't bother, bozo...kill yourself instead...and consider it a
sacrifice for the greater good...because the planet will be much,
much better off without brain-dead morons like you
--
Mark
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Nog" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist Religion |
29 Oct 2005 08:49:56 AM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:rtydnfSwjOQhff_eRVn-vQ@giganews.com...
It doesn't get any more hypocritical than this. How are people supposed to
take anything an atheist says seriously?
http://www.phxnews.com/fullstory.php?article=26321
7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals: Atheism as a Religion
In a correctional facilities case, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
ruled Aug. 19, 2005 that atheism should be considered a religion under the
law and the facilities may not prevent groups of prisoners from forming
groups to study atheism.
In its decision, the court reasoned that preventing these meetings would
infringe upon the inmates' First Amendment right to freely exercise their
religion. The court said, "Atheism is [the inmate's] religion, and the
group
that he wanted to start was religious in nature even though it expressly
rejects a belief in a supreme being."
Claiming atheism to be a religion
Some atheist have established and started a number of atheistic churches,
such as the Naturalistic Pantheists, Brianism, the church of Reality, and
the Fellowship of Reason. There is also a significant atheist presence in
Unitarian Universalism religion, and Michael Newdow's Church of the First
Amendment, to name a few.
--
*****************************************
Science is organized knowledge. Wisdom is organized life.
Oh, does that make the moon a grape? Does it make a dog a cockroach?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Nog" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist Religion |
30 Oct 2005 08:46:56 AM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:rtydnfSwjOQhff_eRVn-vQ@giganews.com...
It doesn't get any more hypocritical than this. How are people supposed to
take anything an atheist says seriously?
http://www.phxnews.com/fullstory.php?article=26321
7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals: Atheism as a Religion
In a correctional facilities case, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
ruled Aug. 19, 2005 that atheism should be considered a religion under the
law and the facilities may not prevent groups of prisoners from forming
groups to study atheism.
In its decision, the court reasoned that preventing these meetings would
infringe upon the inmates' First Amendment right to freely exercise their
religion. The court said, "Atheism is [the inmate's] religion, and the
group
that he wanted to start was religious in nature even though it expressly
rejects a belief in a supreme being."
Claiming atheism to be a religion
Some atheist have established and started a number of atheistic churches,
such as the Naturalistic Pantheists, Brianism, the church of Reality, and
the Fellowship of Reason. There is also a significant atheist presence in
Unitarian Universalism religion, and Michael Newdow's Church of the First
Amendment, to name a few.
--
*****************************************
Science is organized knowledge. Wisdom is organized life.
Who is the Atheist Pope?
Marijuana is one of the best antioxidants.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "nafc" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist Religion |
29 Oct 2005 05:30:08 AM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:rtydnfSwjOQhff_eRVn-vQ@giganews.com...
[snip usual crap]
Claiming athesim to be a religion
[snip]
Lying for Jesus again I see. If you would actually read the ruling you'd
see:
'The Supreme Court has recognized atheism as _equivalent_ to a "religion"
for purposes of the First Amendment on numerous occasions, ...'
So the courts didn't rule that atheism is a religion.
nafc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Les Hellawell" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist Religion |
29 Oct 2005 06:34:20 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 10:30:08 GMT, "nafc" <nafc@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:rtydnfSwjOQhff_eRVn-vQ@giganews.com...
[snip usual crap]
Claiming athesim to be a religion
[snip]
Lying for Jesus again I see. If you would actually read the ruling you'd
see:
'The Supreme Court has recognized atheism as _equivalent_ to a "religion"
for purposes of the First Amendment on numerous occasions, ...'
So the courts didn't rule that atheism is a religion.
It is amazing how much the whole truth instead of a selected half
truth puts an entirely different slant on things. This is why
witnessess in trials swear to tell the truth, nothing but the truth,
and nothing but the *whole* truth since anything else can
be a lie.
"Did you witness the event" (to security guard paid to keep quiet
but not to lie)
"I wasn't there to witness the event your honour so how
can I know what happened?"
"Do you operate a CCTV camera from HQ across town"
"Yes your honour"
"Did you witness the event on CCTV"
"Yes your honour"
"Let me repeat what you said earlier, 'I wasn't there to witness the
event your honour so how can I know what happened?' Were
you telling the whole truth when you said that?
"No your honour"
Les Hellawell
Greetings from:
YORKSHIRE The White Rose County
.
|
|
|
| User: "nafc" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist Religion |
29 Oct 2005 05:29:25 PM |
|
|
"Les Hellawell" <myshredder@leswell.freeuk.com> wrote in message
news:sdm6m15726c7hhc7m46jsfepkeanioilpi@4ax.com...
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 10:30:08 GMT, "nafc" <nafc@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:rtydnfSwjOQhff_eRVn-vQ@giganews.com...
[snip usual crap]
Claiming athesim to be a religion
[snip]
Lying for Jesus again I see. If you would actually read the ruling you'd
see:
'The Supreme Court has recognized atheism as _equivalent_ to a "religion"
for purposes of the First Amendment on numerous occasions, ...'
So the courts didn't rule that atheism is a religion.
It is amazing how much the whole truth instead of a selected half
truth puts an entirely different slant on things.
Exactly. Sometimes Xians whine about how they're being persecuted and give
some case as an example. When you get all the facts you often find that
they left out key details which show there isn't any persecution at all.
This is why
witnessess in trials swear to tell the truth, nothing but the truth,
and nothing but the *whole* truth since anything else can
be a lie.
"Did you witness the event" (to security guard paid to keep quiet
but not to lie)
"I wasn't there to witness the event your honour so how
can I know what happened?"
"Do you operate a CCTV camera from HQ across town"
"Yes your honour"
"Did you witness the event on CCTV"
"Yes your honour"
"Let me repeat what you said earlier, 'I wasn't there to witness the
event your honour so how can I know what happened?' Were
you telling the whole truth when you said that?
"No your honour"
Les Hellawell
Greetings from:
YORKSHIRE The White Rose County
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "J Forbes" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist Religion |
28 Oct 2005 09:54:04 PM |
|
|
-snip crossposting-
J Young wrote:
It doesn't get any more hypocritical than this. How are people supposed to
take anything an atheist says seriously?
I guess that depends on the atheist, eh?
and having an understanding of what atheism is, and what religion is.
There are plenty of non-theistic religions around.
Jim
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Josef Balluch" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist Religion |
29 Oct 2005 08:00:13 AM |
|
|
In a message sent 'round the world, J Young poured fuel on the fire with
the following:
It doesn't get any more hypocritical than this.
Sure it does. Have a look in the mirror.
How are people supposed to
take anything an atheist says seriously?
... sez the Liar for Jesus.
Regards,
Josef
It's not the "True" Christians that are the problem; it's the REAL
Christians.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Del" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist Religion |
29 Oct 2005 01:20:52 AM |
|
|
J Young wrote:
It doesn't get any more hypocritical than this.
Oh come on. Don't be so modest.
How are people supposed to
take anything an atheist says seriously?
Don't worry about what people do. Just worry about yourself.
For instance, ask yourself: how do I, a dishonest bigot, get
to heaven?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "wbarwell" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist Religion |
30 Oct 2005 10:55:34 AM |
|
|
J Young wrote:
It doesn't get any more hypocritical than this. How are people
supposed to take anything an atheist says seriously?
How can anybody take god or religion seiously?
IS THERE A GOD?
Strong Atheism's answer.
A BASIC DEFINITION OF GOD.
The general overarching definition of god as per
the major religions of the world is:
A. God is personal, God has will and consciousness.
B. God has free will.
C. God is the creator of all.
D. God is omnipotent.
E. God is omnibenevolent.
F. God is omniscient.
G. God is that which nothing more powerful
can be imagined.
These are the basic attributes that can be claimed
for the god of orthodox Judaism, Christianity,
Islam, and Hinduism.
Omnibenevolence and omniscience are actually
logically derivable from the claimed attribute of
omnipotence and so aren't not truly independent
attributes, and may be considered special aspects
of omnipotence.
There are other attributes of god, that he is the
only such god, that he is is immortal and that
god has always existed that are not important
for this discussion and for now, can be ignored.
They are secondary arguments and are for the most
part not foundational or truly necessary, except
those that can be logically derived from the
attributes listed above.
A CLASS OF GODS
It is important to note here that this is a
definition not for a particular god, but an
entire class of gods.
Sub-theories about god are not important here.
Christianity claims one may attain salvation
only through Jesus, Islam claims the Christian
dogma that Jesus was the son of god is
blasphemous.
Ideas like this though, are of little importance
to the overarching and general claims made for a
personal, creator, omni-everything god. I have
coined a term, The Grand God of Grand Theologies
for this sort of god, this sort of theological
system of expansive claims for god.
Grand theologies are those theologies that have
adopted this class of god as their basic
attributes concerning the nature of god. But it
is important to remember here that what is being
discussed here is a class of gods, not particular
gods or specific gods.
THE FOUR GREAT THEOLOGICAL TRADITIONS
Again, Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Hinduism hold
to this basic Grand God and are typical Grand
Theologies holding to this basic class of god as
their basic definitions of what god is at god's
most basic level.
A big problem with this class of gods is, it
collapses rather easily into internal self-
contradiction.
THE PROBLEM OF EVIL.
The problem of evil was first written down by
Epicurus in about the third century BCE.
Today's formulation is:
A. God is defined as omnipotent;
B. and as omnibenevolent.
C. Evil exists.
D. God therefore, is not omnipotent as claimed.
E. Or God is not omnibenevolent as claimed.
F. Or god is neither omnipotent or
omnibenevolent.
G. Or god is not existant.
THE FREE WILL DEFENSE
The free will defense of the problem of evil goes
back to St. Augustine who popularized it. It is
still popular, and is championed most notably
today by Alvin Plantinga, but also by other
theologians.
God gave man free will. Man freely chooses to do
evil. Ability to do evil is less evil than
lacking free will.
THE FREE WILL DEFENSE DEBUNKED.
God has free will.
God is omnibenevolent, he has a good nature
incapable of doing evil.
A. If god can have free will, and a good nature,
this good nature is not allowed to count
against god's free will.
B. Nor is god's lack of ability to do evil
allowed to count against god's omnipotence.
C. Likewise, man could easily have a god like
free will and a god like good nature.
D. Inabilty then to do evil would no more count
against man's free will than it does for god's
free will.
E. If so, it also counts against god's free will
and god does not have free will as claimed.
F. If god does not have absolute and total free
will, thus free will is not a true necessity
at all.
F. If god is omnipotent and omnibenevolent, and
can give man a god like free will and a
god-like good nature incapable of moral evil,
god must do so or god is not moral, not
omnibenevolent.
G. Evil exists because he allows it to.
So free will does not exist, or it does and we can
have a god like free will and a god like good
nature. Either way, free will cannot explain away
the existence of evil. This free will defense
then, is a failed argument.
OMNISCIENCE VERSUS CREATORHOOD OF GOD
God is defined as creator of all in most
religions.
And god is claimed to be omniscient, all knowing.
A. God created the Universe and all in it.
B. God is omniscient, all knowing, he knows all
in the Universe and he knows the future of the
Universe and its contents.
C. If god creates a Universe, he will know that
in 13 billion years this Universe will have a
man named John Smith in it.
D. If John Smith is good and saved, or evil and
damned, God will know that.
E. As he knows that the Universe in its present
state will have a John Smith, god may then
contemplate the future state of Smith and
decide if he will tolerate an evil Smith.
F. If yes, Smith will be evil only because of a
specific personal and will choice made solely
by god.
G. If Smith is evil, then evil exists solely
because of a choice made by god. In fact all
moral evil done by creations of god will be
evil and do evil only because of personal and
willful creations of god allowing evil acts
to be done, by direct decision of god.
H. If evil exists in a world with an omniscient
creator god, it is solely and only because
god allows evil.
I. If evil exists solely because of personal
choices of god, god then is not as defined,
omnibenevolent.
J. Man and any other sentient being in such a
Universe cannot have any free will, not even
in principle. A Universe with a god that
creates all and knows all precludes free will
for all beings god creates in the strongest
possible manner.
The Grand God of Grand
Theology is thus self destroying, it is
incoherent and contradictory as a theory.
THE SITUATION SO FAR.
1. A minimalistic class of gods is defined, this
Grand God has been defined here with as few
terms as possible.
2. The problem of evil dooms such a claimed god.
3. The attempted defense, free will is fatally
flawed. God's good nature and free will doom
claims free will makes evil necessary for man
to have free will.
4. Omniscience and creatorhood of god further
doom claims of god's omnibenevolence and
man's free will free will cannot exist for
man. All evil is the direct and knowing
creation of god contradicting claims of
omnibenevolence.
5. Since Free will for man is totally impossible,
free will cannot be a good quality, much less
necessary.
Here, the Grand God of Grand Theology has
collapsed. As has Grand
Theology. As pointed out, this destroys the claims
and viability of an entire class of possible
gods,
all secondary and tertiary claims for such a god
of
this class also fail, as do dogmas or secondary
or tertiary claims.
If a these Grand Gods cannot exist as defined,
specific gods cannot, nor can claims such as this
or that Grand God sent this or that revelation to
man or some prophet or did this or that.
God is thus disproven and is utter irrelevant
to anything real and existant.
***********
http://www.phxnews.com/fullstory.php?article=26321
7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals: Atheism as a Religion
In a correctional facilities case, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals ruled Aug. 19, 2005 that atheism should be considered a
religion under the law and the facilities may not prevent groups of
prisoners from forming groups to study atheism.
In its decision, the court reasoned that preventing these meetings
would infringe upon the inmates' First Amendment right to freely
exercise their religion. The court said, "Atheism is [the inmate's]
religion, and the group that he wanted to start was religious in
nature even though it expressly rejects a belief in a supreme
being."
Claiming atheism to be a religion
Some atheist have established and started a number of atheistic
churches, such as the Naturalistic Pantheists, Brianism, the church
of Reality, and the Fellowship of Reason. There is also a
significant atheist presence in Unitarian Universalism religion, and
Michael Newdow's Church of the First Amendment, to name a few.
--
The official spokesman of the Foxes said
today that investigation into what happened
to the henhouse may be needed.
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "george" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist Religion |
30 Oct 2005 01:47:34 PM |
|
|
J Young wrote:
It doesn't get any more hypocritical than this. How are people supposed to
take anything an atheist says seriously?
Being a theist you need to firstly pass the remedial reading courses.
there is no proof of any god..
unless of course you're going to invoke the big pink sky pixy which I
rather doubt
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Thurisaz, Germanic barbarian" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist Religion |
29 Oct 2005 02:06:19 AM |
|
|
J Young wrote:
It doesn't get any more hypocritical than this. How are people supposed to
take anything an atheist says seriously?
Should you not jump with joy? After all, is exactly this not what fundies
have claimed for quite some time now?
--
"T his friend a man a friend shall prove,
And gifts with gifts requite;
But men shall mocking with mockery answer,
And fraud with falsehood meet."
(The Poetic Edda)
Must have been written with fundies in mind...
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "S. Maizlich" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist Religion |
30 Oct 2005 02:46:02 PM |
|
|
J Young wrote:
It doesn't get any more hypocritical than this. How are people supposed to
take anything an atheist says seriously?
What's hypocritical about it, dumbo? Atheism doesn't
mean one doesn't have religious beliefs, you idiot; it
means a lack of belief in god.
http://www.phxnews.com/fullstory.php?article=26321
7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals: Atheism as a Religion
In a correctional facilities case, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
ruled Aug. 19, 2005 that atheism should be considered a religion under the
law and the facilities may not prevent groups of prisoners from forming
groups to study atheism.
In its decision, the court reasoned that preventing these meetings would
infringe upon the inmates' First Amendment right to freely exercise their
religion. The court said, "Atheism is [the inmate's] religion, and the group
that he wanted to start was religious in nature even though it expressly
rejects a belief in a supreme being."
Claiming atheism to be a religion
Some atheist have established and started a number of atheistic churches,
such as the Naturalistic Pantheists, Brianism, the church of Reality, and
the Fellowship of Reason. There is also a significant atheist presence in
Unitarian Universalism religion, and Michael Newdow's Church of the First
Amendment, to name a few.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steve Knight" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist Religion |
28 Oct 2005 10:53:43 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:36:26 -0400, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
wrote:
It doesn't get any more hypocritical than this. How are people supposed to
take anything an atheist says seriously?
They never have, *****.
You can post all the ***** you want about atheists and people will
believe it. We are the last bastion of untold abuse without
repercussion.
Twit.
Warlord Steve
BAAWA
www.sonic.net/~wooly
.
|
|
|
| User: "J Young" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist Religion |
28 Oct 2005 11:18:09 PM |
|
|
"Steve Knight" <wooly@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:fis5m1p51qnr0bmuecauvhs5qbvdqvdmh5@4ax.com...
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:36:26 -0400, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
wrote:
It doesn't get any more hypocritical than this. How are people supposed
to
take anything an atheist says seriously?
They never have, *****.
You can post all the ***** you want about atheists and people will
believe it. We are the last bastion of untold abuse without
repercussion.
That's b.s.; try being a Catholic and see how many lies are told about you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Phÿltêr" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist Religion |
30 Oct 2005 02:28:50 AM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> astounded us with:
news:waydnWsbabkJZf_eRVn-jA@giganews.com:
"Steve Knight" <wooly@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:fis5m1p51qnr0bmuecauvhs5qbvdqvdmh5@4ax.com...
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:36:26 -0400, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
wrote:
It doesn't get any more hypocritical than this. How are people supposed
to
take anything an atheist says seriously?
They never have, *****.
You can post all the ***** you want about atheists and people will
believe it. We are the last bastion of untold abuse without
repercussion.
That's b.s.; try being a Catholic and see how many lies are told about
you.
Awwwww, da poor widdle kaffalick gets picked on... boo fuckin hoo, the
persecution never stops, does it? When all you're "simply" trying to do is
impose your theist fucking horseshit fairytale lies on the rest of
humanity, and it hurts you widdle feewings when you're told to "*****".
--
Phÿltêr
Alt.Atheism #1938
Denizen of Darkness #44 & AFJC Antipodean Attaché
Remove "s" to respond
http://www.jesusneverexisted.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "cliffreeling" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist Religion |
30 Oct 2005 10:52:05 AM |
|
|
"Phltjr" <phylter@hsotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6v%8f.4413$Hj2.3078@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> astounded us with:
news:waydnWsbabkJZf_eRVn-jA@giganews.com:
"Steve Knight" <wooly@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:fis5m1p51qnr0bmuecauvhs5qbvdqvdmh5@4ax.com...
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:36:26 -0400, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
wrote:
It doesn't get any more hypocritical than this. How are people supposed
to take anything an atheist says seriously?
They sodomite/atheist all need a baseball bat up their *****! That's the only thing
these morons
understand. It's all about no rules, no standards and THEM IN CONTROL...so they
want to TAKE YOUR GUN (like Nazi Germany), they perverted language, and behind the scenes
manufactured putrid manure and their sodomite worshippers lick it up like hogs eating
slop.
These "people" loved Aubi GrabbingIt...it's their lifestyle on display...both political
parties, Hollywood and the national media is one big incestuous group of sodomites who
buttfuck each other daily and smile on your TV screen with fecal matter all over their
teeth and chin. KuntieKourick is a perfumed turd who loves big hard objects rammed up her
*****! She then spits them out to you to ingest and you do..like swine...and they laugh
their
asses off at your slave mentality. The USA is just one big slave-holding plantation and
you are one of the nigras and you love it. All they need do is whip a twenty on you and
give you your up-the-***** 'feeel good treatment' (the ACLU eats fecal matter three
times daily and they are bringing a lawsuit for discriminating agains chickenshit which is
being shunned because it might have some Asian flu disease! Get it! They eat and drink
feces daily, swim in it, know nothing but it, so aren't sensitive to the putrid rotten
smell anymore...they drink brown stuff from their blenders, sprinkle it on donuts, take it
to supermarket food stores and sprinkle it on pasteres, and now they must soldier on
seeking your rhats! Your rhats! RHAT! Your rhats to baseball up your *****, to fecal
language, pronographic, Satanic down-with-America feces in grade schools... )
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist Religion |
31 Oct 2005 08:13:30 AM |
|
|
"cliffreeling" <cliffreeling@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:UQ69f.14664$wG.504@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
"Phltjr" <phylter@hsotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6v%8f.4413$Hj2.3078@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> astounded us with:
news:waydnWsbabkJZf_eRVn-jA@giganews.com:
"Steve Knight" <wooly@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:fis5m1p51qnr0bmuecauvhs5qbvdqvdmh5@4ax.com...
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:36:26 -0400, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
wrote:
It doesn't get any more hypocritical than this. How are people
supposed
to take anything an atheist says seriously?
They sodomite/atheist all need a baseball bat up their *****!
Hey, ***** you too, troglodyte! PLONK
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn't burn people at the stake for disagreeing - Vic Sagerquist
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dwain" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist Religion |
30 Oct 2005 11:24:15 AM |
|
|
In article <UQ69f.14664$wG.504@bignews4.bellsouth.net>, cliffreeling
at says...
They sodomite/atheist all need a baseball bat up their *****! That's the only thing
these morons
understand. It's all about no rules, no standards and THEM IN CONTROL...so they
want to TAKE YOUR GUN (like Nazi Germany), they perverted language, and behind the scenes
manufactured putrid manure and their sodomite worshippers lick it up like hogs eating
slop.
These "people" loved Aubi GrabbingIt...it's their lifestyle on display...both political
parties, Hollywood and the national media is one big incestuous group of sodomites who
buttfuck each other daily and smile on your TV screen with fecal matter all over their
teeth and chin. KuntieKourick is a perfumed turd who loves big hard objects rammed up her
*****! She then spits them out to you to ingest and you do..like swine...and they laugh
their
asses off at your slave mentality. The USA is just one big slave-holding plantation and
you are one of the nigras and you love it. All they need do is whip a twenty on you and
give you your up-the-***** 'feeel good treatment' (the ACLU eats fecal matter three
times daily and they are bringing a lawsuit for discriminating agains chickenshit which is
being shunned because it might have some Asian flu disease! Get it! They eat and drink
feces daily, swim in it, know nothing but it, so aren't sensitive to the putrid rotten
smell anymore...they drink brown stuff from their blenders, sprinkle it on donuts, take it
to supermarket food stores and sprinkle it on pasteres, and now they must soldier on
seeking your rhats! Your rhats! RHAT! Your rhats to baseball up your *****, to fecal
language, pronographic, Satanic down-with-America feces in grade schools... )
"It is the people with secret attractions to various temptations, who
busy themselves with removing those temptations from other people;
really they are defending themselves under pretext of defending others,
because at heart they fear their own weaknesses." - Ernest Jones
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist Religion |
31 Oct 2005 01:14:35 PM |
|
|
on 30 Oct 2005 in alt.atheism, dear sweet cliffreeling
(cliffreeling@yahoo.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
"Phltjr" <phylter@hsotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6v%8f.4413$Hj2.3078@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> astounded us with:
news:waydnWsbabkJZf_eRVn-jA@giganews.com:
"Steve Knight" <wooly@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:fis5m1p51qnr0bmuecauvhs5qbvdqvdmh5@4ax.com...
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:36:26 -0400, "J Young"
<youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
It doesn't get any more hypocritical than this. How are people
supposed
to take anything an atheist says seriously?
They sodomite/atheist all need a baseball bat up their *****!
That's the only thing these morons
understand. It's all about no rules, no standards and THEM IN
CONTROL...so they want to TAKE YOUR GUN (like Nazi Germany), they
perverted language, and behind the scenes manufactured putrid manure
and their sodomite worshippers lick it up like hogs eating slop.
These "people" loved Aubi GrabbingIt...it's their lifestyle on
display...both political parties, Hollywood and the national media is
one big incestuous group of sodomites who buttfuck each other daily
and smile on your TV screen with fecal matter all over their teeth
and chin. KuntieKourick is a perfumed turd who loves big hard
objects rammed up her *****! She then spits them out to you to ingest
and you do..like swine...and they laugh their
asses off at your slave mentality. The USA is just one big
slave-holding plantation and you are one of the nigras and you love
it. All they need do is whip a twenty on you and give you your
up-the-***** 'feeel good treatment' (the ACLU eats fecal matter
three times daily and they are bringing a lawsuit for discriminating
agains chickenshit which is being shunned because it might have some
Asian flu disease! Get it! They eat and drink feces daily, swim in
it, know nothing but it, so aren't sensitive to the putrid rotten
smell anymore...they drink brown stuff from their blenders, sprinkle
it on donuts, take it to supermarket food stores and sprinkle it on
pasteres, and now they must soldier on seeking your rhats! Your
rhats! RHAT! Your rhats to baseball up your *****, to fecal
language, pronographic, Satanic down-with-America feces in grade
schools... )
What this post needs is a little more spittle.
--
Uncle Vic
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
----
"The world is only 5-6 thousand years old does not mean the planet
earth is only 5-6 thousand years old. There have been many worlds
created and destroyed on this planet. The creation of the planet is
described in Genesis 1. The creation of the world is described in
Genesis 2. Two different kind of creations." --Eric Brze
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sheldon Liberman" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist Religion |
30 Oct 2005 02:22:28 PM |
|
|
Ph=FFlt=EAr wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> astounded us with:
news:waydnWsbabkJZf_eRVn-jA@giganews.com:
"Steve Knight" <wooly@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:fis5m1p51qnr0bmuecauvhs5qbvdqvdmh5@4ax.com...
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:36:26 -0400, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
wrote:
It doesn't get any more hypocritical than this. How are people suppos=
ed
to
take anything an atheist says seriously?
They never have, *****.
You can post all the ***** you want about atheists and people will
believe it. We are the last bastion of untold abuse without
repercussion.
That's b.s.; try being a Catholic and see how many lies are told about
you.
Awwwww, da poor widdle kaffalick gets picked on... boo fuckin hoo, the
persecution never stops, does it? When all you're "simply" trying to do is
impose your theist fucking horseshit fairytale lies on the rest of
humanity,...
..=2E.and on you...
and it hurts you widdle feewings when you're told to "*****".
Actually, being told to f--- off by the likes of you is tantamount to
being blessed by someone who actually has some intelligence.
--
Ph=FFlt=EAr
Alt.Atheism #1938
Denizen of Darkness #44 & AFJC Antipodean Attach=E9
Remove "s" to respond
http://www.jesusneverexisted.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Phÿltêr" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist Religion |
01 Nov 2005 08:29:23 AM |
|
|
"Sheldon Liberman" <sheldon@liberman.com> astounded us with:
news:1130703748.283580.172420@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Phÿltêr wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> astounded us with:
news:waydnWsbabkJZf_eRVn-jA@giganews.com:
"Steve Knight" <wooly@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:fis5m1p51qnr0bmuecauvhs5qbvdqvdmh5@4ax.com...
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:36:26 -0400, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
wrote:
It doesn't get any more hypocritical than this. How are people
suppos
ed
to
take anything an atheist says seriously?
They never have, *****.
You can post all the ***** you want about atheists and people will
believe it. We are the last bastion of untold abuse without
repercussion.
That's b.s.; try being a Catholic and see how many lies are told about
you.
Awwwww, da poor widdle kaffalick gets picked on... boo fuckin hoo, the
persecution never stops, does it? When all you're "simply" trying to do
is
impose your theist fucking horseshit fairytale lies on the rest of
humanity,...
...and on you...
and it hurts you widdle feewings when you're told to "*****".
Actually, being told to f--- off by the likes of you is tantamount to
being blessed by someone who actually has some intelligence.
Why thank you!
--
Phÿltêr
Alt.Atheism #1938
Denizen of Darkness #44 & AFJC Antipodean Attaché
Remove "s" to respond
http://www.jesusneverexisted.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist Religion |
01 Nov 2005 09:01:13 AM |
|
|
Ph=FFlt=EAr wrote:
"Sheldon Liberman" <sheldon@liberman.com> astounded us with:
news:1130703748.283580.172420@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Ph=FFlt=EAr wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> astounded us with:
news:waydnWsbabkJZf_eRVn-jA@giganews.com:
"Steve Knight" <wooly@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:fis5m1p51qnr0bmuecauvhs5qbvdqvdmh5@4ax.com...
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:36:26 -0400, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.co=
m>
wrote:
It doesn't get any more hypocritical than this. How are people
suppos
ed
to
take anything an atheist says seriously?
They never have, *****.
You can post all the ***** you want about atheists and people will
believe it. We are the last bastion of untold abuse without
repercussion.
That's b.s.; try being a Catholic and see how many lies are told abo=
ut
you.
Awwwww, da poor widdle kaffalick gets picked on... boo fuckin hoo, the
persecution never stops, does it? When all you're "simply" trying to do
is
impose your theist fucking horseshit fairytale lies on the rest of
humanity,...
...and on you...
and it hurts you widdle feewings when you're told to "*****".
Actually, being told to f--- off by the likes of you is tantamount to
being blessed by someone who actually has some intelligence.
Why thank you!
Anytime.
--
Ph=FFlt=EAr
Alt.Atheism #1938
Denizen of Darkness #44 & AFJC Antipodean Attach=E9
Remove "s" to respond
http://www.jesusneverexisted.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Del" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist Religion |
29 Oct 2005 01:23:24 AM |
|
|
J Young wrote:
"Steve Knight" <wooly@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:fis5m1p51qnr0bmuecauvhs5qbvdqvdmh5@4ax.com...
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:36:26 -0400, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
wrote:
It doesn't get any more hypocritical tha n this. How are people supposed
to
take anything an atheist says seriously?
They never have, *****.
You can post all the ***** you want about atheists and people will
believe it. We are the last bastion of untold abuse without
repercussion.
That's b.s.; try being a Catholic and see how many lies are told about you.
How is anyone supposed to believe you child molesters? l
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jos Flachs - skip the aa" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist Religion |
30 Oct 2005 04:18:52 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:18:09 -0400, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
wrote:
"Steve Knight" <wooly@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:fis5m1p51qnr0bmuecauvhs5qbvdqvdmh5@4ax.com...
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:36:26 -0400, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
wrote:
It doesn't get any more hypocritical than this. How are people supposed
to
take anything an atheist says seriously?
They never have, *****.
You can post all the ***** you want about atheists and people will
believe it. We are the last bastion of untold abuse without
repercussion.
That's b.s.; try being a Catholic and see how many lies are told about you.
Sorry, you should rephrase that a bit. "try being a catholic, and see
how many lies we tell about anyone'.
There, that is much better.
Any new demi-gods created by your high priest (pontifex maximus IS
high priest) recently?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Duca" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist Religion |
29 Oct 2005 12:04:13 AM |
|
|
in article waydnWsbabkJZf_eRVn-jA@giganews.com, J Young at
youngopinions@aol.com wrote on 10/29/05 12:18 AM:
"Steve Knight" <wooly@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:fis5m1p51qnr0bmuecauvhs5qbvdqvdmh5@4ax.com...
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:36:26 -0400, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
wrote:
It doesn't get any more hypocritical than this. How are people supposed
to
take anything an atheist says seriously?
They never have, *****.
You can post all the ***** you want about atheists and people will
believe it. We are the last bastion of untold abuse without
repercussion.
That's b.s.; try being a Catholic and see how many lies are told about you.
Not even 45 minutes a week of yadda yadda from your priest makes you feel
better
--
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Duca" |
|
| Title: Re: Atheist Religion |
29 Oct 2005 12:00:46 AM |
|
|
in article rtydnfSwjOQhff_eRVn-vQ@giganews.com, J Young at
youngopinions@aol.com wrote on 10/28/05 10:36 PM:
It doesn't get any more hypocritical than this. How are people supposed to
take anything an atheist says seriously?
People don't take anything YOU say seriously...and neither does God.
Paul
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
