Atheist territorial perceptions and behaviors



 Religions > Atheism > Atheist territorial perceptions and behaviors

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 2 of 2

1

 

2

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "societopia.net"
Date: 12 Jun 2005 10:26:35 PM
Object: Atheist territorial perceptions and behaviors
Do the atheists on this forum seriously consider this place their exclusive
territory, similar to how animals mark their territories?
If so, what do they perceive the task of protecting their territory to be?
What does it entail?
What would happen if a city were completely atheist? Do you know of examples
in history of a culture that was atheist and respected human life and
dignity?
If you are the in US, are there places or communities in America where you
would describe as being atheist territories that people should be warned not
speak the Bible in?
If you were in other parts in the world, are there atheist territories in
your country today that you know of where one should be warned not to speak
the Bible in? Have you visited them? If so can you describe your
experience?
God bless you,
www.societopia.net
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Atheist territorial perceptions and behaviors 14 Jun 2005 09:41:12 AM
nJb wrote:

Cider mills are a big deal in Michigan in the fall. I've missed that
since moving to Utah. I had the good fortune to spend most of last
summer in Corning, NY. Spent some time up in Sterling also. Great area.

I live about halfway between Corning and Sterling - I'm hoping
to hit the Rennaissance Fair there with my family later this
summer. Lots of great areas in NY, one of my favorites are the
gorges on the Finger Lakes up near Ithaca.
Walt Smith
Firelock on DALNet
.
User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: Atheist territorial perceptions and behaviors 14 Jun 2005 09:59:20 AM
<firelock_ny@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1118760072.573153.224470@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

nJb wrote:

Cider mills are a big deal in Michigan in the fall. I've missed that
since moving to Utah. I had the good fortune to spend most of last
summer in Corning, NY. Spent some time up in Sterling also. Great area.


I live about halfway between Corning and Sterling - I'm hoping
to hit the Rennaissance Fair there with my family later this
summer. Lots of great areas in NY, one of my favorites are the
gorges on the Finger Lakes up near Ithaca.

Hey, you're not too far from me. I'm in Bergen County, NJ, right by
Rockland County. The last time I went to the Rennaissance Fair was a tad
over 20 years ago, but we were going to try to get there this summer as well
:)
I haven't been to the Finger Lakes, but I do love the Adirondacks. We're
renting a cabin with some friends in Ticonderoga in August.
--
------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn't burn people at the stake for disagreeing - Vic Sagerquist
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Atheist territorial perceptions and behaviors 14 Jun 2005 12:22:54 PM
Robibnikoff wrote:

<firelock_ny@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1118760072.573153.224470@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

nJb wrote:

Cider mills are a big deal in Michigan in the fall. I've missed that
since moving to Utah. I had the good fortune to spend most of last
summer in Corning, NY. Spent some time up in Sterling also. Great area.


I live about halfway between Corning and Sterling - I'm hoping
to hit the Rennaissance Fair there with my family later this
summer. Lots of great areas in NY, one of my favorites are the
gorges on the Finger Lakes up near Ithaca.


Hey, you're not too far from me. I'm in Bergen County, NJ, right by
Rockland County.

<cue dance mix version of Disney's "It's A Small World
After All"> :-)

The last time I went to the Rennaissance Fair was a tad
over 20 years ago, but we were going to try to get there this summer as well
:)

Maybe we'll run into each other...or not, if I remember right
the Sterling RenFaire is like a month-long affair.

I haven't been to the Finger Lakes, but I do love the Adirondacks. We're
renting a cabin with some friends in Ticonderoga in August.

Our vacation dream this year is a cabin down in the Chesapeake
Bay area, Chincoteague Island, so we can spend most of our
day on Assateague beaches. I've taken my family there once
so far, we'd like to make it a regular thing. Wild ponies,
sand dunes, body surfing, etc...should be a lot of fun.
Walt Smith
Firelock on DALNet
.
User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: Atheist territorial perceptions and behaviors 14 Jun 2005 05:51:40 PM
<firelock_ny@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1118769774.466300.298320@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Robibnikoff wrote:

<firelock_ny@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1118760072.573153.224470@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

nJb wrote:

Cider mills are a big deal in Michigan in the fall. I've missed that
since moving to Utah. I had the good fortune to spend most of last
summer in Corning, NY. Spent some time up in Sterling also. Great
area.


I live about halfway between Corning and Sterling - I'm hoping
to hit the Rennaissance Fair there with my family later this
summer. Lots of great areas in NY, one of my favorites are the
gorges on the Finger Lakes up near Ithaca.


Hey, you're not too far from me. I'm in Bergen County, NJ, right by
Rockland County.


<cue dance mix version of Disney's "It's A Small World
After All"> :-)

ACK! Bad Song Hell! I'll get you for this! :)

The last time I went to the Rennaissance Fair was a tad
over 20 years ago, but we were going to try to get there this summer as
well
:)


Maybe we'll run into each other...or not, if I remember right
the Sterling RenFaire is like a month-long affair.

I always plan on going and the next thing I know, it's over. I'm definitely
going to do my best to get there this year. Right now, I'm trying to
convince the family to go to the Kutztown German Festival in PA. I've been
dying to go there for about three years.


I haven't been to the Finger Lakes, but I do love the Adirondacks. We're
renting a cabin with some friends in Ticonderoga in August.


Our vacation dream this year is a cabin down in the Chesapeake
Bay area, Chincoteague Island, so we can spend most of our
day on Assateague beaches. I've taken my family there once
so far, we'd like to make it a regular thing. Wild ponies,
sand dunes, body surfing, etc...should be a lot of fun.

Oh, you *****! I've wanted to go there since I read "Misty of
Chincoteague" as a ten-year-old. I am SOOOOOO jealous :)
--
------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn't burn people at the stake for disagreeing - Vic Sagerquist
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Atheist territorial perceptions and behaviors 15 Jun 2005 08:44:37 AM
Robibnikoff wrote:

<firelock_ny@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1118769774.466300.298320@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Our vacation dream this year is a cabin down in the Chesapeake
Bay area, Chincoteague Island, so we can spend most of our
day on Assateague beaches. I've taken my family there once
so far, we'd like to make it a regular thing. Wild ponies,
sand dunes, body surfing, etc...should be a lot of fun.


Oh, you *****! I've wanted to go there since I read "Misty of
Chincoteague" as a ten-year-old. I am SOOOOOO jealous :)

It is everything you imagine and more. I'm partial to the
south end of Assateague Island, and nearby Chincoteague
is *very* reasonable for lodging. I recommend not going
during Pony Penning week, though (the horse auction
featured in the book), I understand you can't get lodging
within a hundred miles of the place while people from all
over the world are bidding on world-famous (but otherwise
relatively normal) wild ponies.
Last time we went there was this odd "coastal upwelling"
going on - the locals hadn't seen anything like it in
a decade or more. It seems the water hitting the beach
had been sitting on the bottom of the ocean a few hours
ago, and was way too cold for anything but wading in the
water. The little motel we stayed at had a nice pool,
but hopefully this year we can actually swim in the
ocean without freezing our unmentionables off.
Walt Smith
Firelock on DALNet
.
User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: Atheist territorial perceptions and behaviors 15 Jun 2005 10:03:13 AM
<firelock_ny@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1118843077.296869.253700@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Robibnikoff wrote:

<firelock_ny@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1118769774.466300.298320@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Our vacation dream this year is a cabin down in the Chesapeake
Bay area, Chincoteague Island, so we can spend most of our
day on Assateague beaches. I've taken my family there once
so far, we'd like to make it a regular thing. Wild ponies,
sand dunes, body surfing, etc...should be a lot of fun.


Oh, you *****! I've wanted to go there since I read "Misty of
Chincoteague" as a ten-year-old. I am SOOOOOO jealous :)


It is everything you imagine and more.

Waaaah! <sniff!> ;)
I'm partial to the

south end of Assateague Island, and nearby Chincoteague
is *very* reasonable for lodging. I recommend not going
during Pony Penning week, though (the horse auction
featured in the book), I understand you can't get lodging
within a hundred miles of the place while people from all
over the world are bidding on world-famous (but otherwise
relatively normal) wild ponies.

As much as I would LOVE to see that, I've seen programs on the Pony Penning
and know how crowded it gets. If I ever to get myself down there, it won't
be during that time.

Last time we went there was this odd "coastal upwelling"
going on - the locals hadn't seen anything like it in
a decade or more. It seems the water hitting the beach
had been sitting on the bottom of the ocean a few hours
ago, and was way too cold for anything but wading in the
water. The little motel we stayed at had a nice pool,
but hopefully this year we can actually swim in the
ocean without freezing our unmentionables off.

Hopefully you will :)
I'm really not that much of a beach person, but I think I'd love vacationing
in that sort of area. I have been to Cape Code and absolutely loved it.
--
------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn't burn people at the stake for disagreeing - Vic Sagerquist
.





User: "nJb"

Title: Re: Atheist territorial perceptions and behaviors 14 Jun 2005 04:16:16 PM
wrote:

nJb wrote:

Cider mills are a big deal in Michigan in the fall. I've missed that
since moving to Utah. I had the good fortune to spend most of last
summer in Corning, NY. Spent some time up in Sterling also. Great area.



I live about halfway between Corning and Sterling - I'm hoping
to hit the Rennaissance Fair there with my family later this
summer. Lots of great areas in NY, one of my favorites are the
gorges on the Finger Lakes up near Ithaca.

Walt Smith
Firelock on DALNet

Small world. I got to hike Watkins Glen, saw some gorge thing by or in
Ithica, walked all day at the Cornell Botanical Gardens, went to the Ren
Fair, all with my in laws from Sterling. Next time we're going to the
Adirondacks. Just an amazing area rich with history. If you're at all
into wines, there is a festival at Corning Museum of Glass this Friday
(17th). A great selection of award winning wines and food for $35.
http://www.cmog.org/index.asp?pageId=1182
If I ever move back to the east, the Finger Lakes area is high on my list.
--
Jack
Plonked by Native American
bobo1148atxmissiondotcom
http://photos.yahoo.com/bc/xmissionbobo/
.
User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: Atheist territorial perceptions and behaviors 14 Jun 2005 05:53:15 PM
"nJb" <none@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:d8nhe4$mch$1@news.xmission.com...

firelock_ny@hotmail.com wrote:

nJb wrote:

Cider mills are a big deal in Michigan in the fall. I've missed that
since moving to Utah. I had the good fortune to spend most of last
summer in Corning, NY. Spent some time up in Sterling also. Great area.



I live about halfway between Corning and Sterling - I'm hoping
to hit the Rennaissance Fair there with my family later this
summer. Lots of great areas in NY, one of my favorites are the
gorges on the Finger Lakes up near Ithaca.

Walt Smith
Firelock on DALNet


Small world. I got to hike Watkins Glen, saw some gorge thing by or in
Ithica, walked all day at the Cornell Botanical Gardens, went to the Ren
Fair, all with my in laws from Sterling. Next time we're going to the
Adirondacks.

Where? We're going to be in the Lake George/Ticonderoga area, with a side
trip to Long Lake - Last week in August :)
Just an amazing area rich with history. If you're at all

into wines, there is a festival at Corning Museum of Glass this Friday
(17th). A great selection of award winning wines and food for $35.

http://www.cmog.org/index.asp?pageId=1182

Cool! Thanks for the link. Ever been to the Brotherwood Winery in
Washingtonville, NY?

If I ever move back to the east, the Finger Lakes area is high on my
list.

--
------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn't burn people at the stake for disagreeing - Vic Sagerquist
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Atheist territorial perceptions and behaviors 15 Jun 2005 08:58:41 AM
nJb wrote:

firelock_ny@hotmail.com wrote:

I live about halfway between Corning and Sterling - I'm hoping
to hit the Rennaissance Fair there with my family later this
summer. Lots of great areas in NY, one of my favorites are the
gorges on the Finger Lakes up near Ithaca.


Small world. I got to hike Watkins Glen, saw some gorge thing by or in
Ithica,

My favorite gorge up in Ithaca is Taughannok.
http://www.ilovenyphotos.com/ithgorges/taughannock1.html
I love to walk up the gorge, wade in the water, see the
falls. Makes a great hike.
You being from out west makes me wonder...are Spanish
place names as hard to learn how to spell as Indian ones?
Susquehannah, Taughannok, Chincoteague, Chittenango,
and those are just the easier ones. :-)
Walt Smith
Firelock on DALNet
.



User: "Graham Kennedy"

Title: Re: Atheist territorial perceptions and behaviors 13 Jun 2005 05:05:26 PM
societopia.net wrote:

Do the atheists on this forum seriously consider this place their exclusive
territory, similar to how animals mark their territories?

What an interesting notion. I for one certainly don't
consider myself to be the owner of this "place", not
even part owner. It's more like... well a good analogy
could be a theme bar. The people who use it don't own
it, but nevertheless there is a certain theme to the
place and it's at least rude to barge in there and
disregard it.

If so, what do they perceive the task of protecting their territory to be?
What does it entail?

Nothing.

What would happen if a city were completely atheist?

Personally, I imagine it would be virtually identical
to an ordinary city. There'd be minor differences - no
churches, possibly better schools. But ultimately, people
are people and that's how they behave.

Do you know of examples
in history of a culture that was atheist

No.

and respected human life and
dignity?

If you are the in US, are there places or communities in America where you
would describe as being atheist territories that people should be warned not
speak the Bible in?

Well I don't live in the US, but "my house" is an atheist
territory and the bible is not welcome here. Not that I
actively try to bar it - to be honest the issue has never
come up, I don't think I've ever met a person that carried
a bible around with them. And if somebody really wanted to
bring a bible in I suppose I'd let them. But it wouldn't
be welcome, it would be tolerated.

If you were in other parts in the world, are there atheist territories in
your country today that you know of where one should be warned not to speak
the Bible in? Have you visited them? If so can you describe your
experience?

I can't really say that I know of an "atheist territory"
in the world. It depends on what you mean by that term.
Is an atheist territory one populated only by atheists?
If so then I doubt such a place exists.
--
Graham Kennedy
Creator and Author,
Daystrom Institute Technical Library
http://www.ditl.org
.
User: "societopia.net"

Title: Re: Atheist territorial perceptions and behaviors 13 Jun 2005 07:13:06 PM
"Graham Kennedy" <graham@ditl.org> wrote in message
news:Gqnre.5789$Vj3.3471@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...

societopia.net wrote:

....

Do you know of examples
in history of a culture that was atheist


No.

Have you ever wondered why? May I suggest examining the values of building
tolerant societies? What would one do if one faced an opposing will? Where
does the value of human life as sacred come from?


and respected human life and
dignity?

If you are the in US, are there places or communities in America where

you

would describe as being atheist territories that people should be warned

not

speak the Bible in?


Well I don't live in the US, but "my house" is an atheist
territory and the bible is not welcome here. Not that I
actively try to bar it - to be honest the issue has never
come up, I don't think I've ever met a person that carried
a bible around with them. And if somebody really wanted to
bring a bible in I suppose I'd let them. But it wouldn't
be welcome, it would be tolerated.

Thanks for such a tolerant expression. This is what I did not encounter
here. If you search for my first message on this forum you would find that
all I did was writing "God bless you" after a few quotation from the Bible
and... what do you know? I witnessed a barrage of profanity and violent
language. Now, I look down the list of respondents on any thread and skip
out reading those from people whose language I already read.

If you were in other parts in the world, are there atheist territories

in

your country today that you know of where one should be warned not to

speak

the Bible in? Have you visited them? If so can you describe your
experience?


I can't really say that I know of an "atheist territory"
in the world. It depends on what you mean by that term.
Is an atheist territory one populated only by atheists?
If so then I doubt such a place exists.

Well, atheist regimes, such as Russia and China built all kind of barriers
around their people from accessing religion. It seems that the most
insecure societies were atheist and they crumbled on their own out of lack
of values. Just look at Russia today; people are living in their little
apartments behind iron doors because they are afraid someone from their
community might come with a machine gun and shoot them only to collect a few
rubles. This is what happened when people lived for long time thinking
that they can build societies without values (which are of the spirit).
Thanks again for being the second decent writer to respond to my messages.
God bless you,
www.societopia.net
.
User: "Pastor Ferdinna"

Title: Re: Atheist territorial perceptions and behaviors 14 Jun 2005 05:37:08 AM
"language I already read. "
You mis-spelled "contributions I am intellectually incapable of
answering".
.
User: "societopia.net"

Title: Re: Atheist territorial perceptions and behaviors 15 Jun 2005 06:07:12 AM
"Pastor Ferdinna" <user13@heathens.org.uk> wrote in message
news:1118745428.762289.190640@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

"language I already read. "
You mis-spelled "contributions I am intellectually incapable of
answering".

They said that I was not welcome to participate with them so I left their
messages alone. Or were they just being "noughti" :-)
It is a public forum and they are free to post it.
God bless you,
www.societopia.net
.


User: ""

Title: Re: Atheist territorial perceptions and behaviors 14 Jun 2005 01:17:36 AM
Would you agree that atheist regimes who enforce atheism have an agenda
that transcends atheism? The point of the Soviet Union and of China was
not
to promote atheism, but to promote the supremacy of the State. The
supremacy
of the State guaranteed the power of the ruling class, and that was the
goal of
the whole exercise. Apparently the people of the Soviet Union and China
weren't
supposed to notice that there WAS a ruling class, but it has certainly
become
clear that such existed. Of course China hasn't crumbled. It may yet
grow and
adapt. If it doesn't adapt to the human desire for religion, it too may
crumble
under the pressure of Christian converts.
I'm sure you know that our goal here is to encourage everyone to think
for
him/herself. I'm not aware of anyone here holding up Stalin or Mao as
an
ideal to be emulated.
Frankly, I think that the United States is darn close to an atheistic
society.
No matter how much lip service is paid to God, I don't see much actual
influence exerted by God or Biblical teachings on our national policy
of war
when it's intended to protect Americans, or our national media, which
uses
sex and violence to sell absolutely everything, or on our national
priorities,
which set profit above helping the poor and unlucky. What's missing is
the ethical concerns many atheists have about social justice and
helping the disadvantaged.
I'd be curious to know if you think the present administration behaves
the
way you'd expect Christians to behave, or the way you'd expect atheists
to behave.
.
User: "societopia.net"

Title: Re: Atheist territorial perceptions and behaviors 14 Jun 2005 06:21:12 PM
<Grey.Neighbor@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1118729856.638880.145640@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Would you agree that atheist regimes who enforce atheism have an agenda
that transcends atheism?

There are no grandiose agendas set in dark rooms that work against God in
the universe; I don't believe in conspiracies because I believe in God's
will in the world. Whoever does something bad only hurts himself. So I
disagree with your sentence. I think that what happened in Russia was that
some pretty genius minds that thought in earthly terms to revolt in the
midst of dark history did not have the values to guide their steps once they
actually get what dreamed was justice. It is the lack of values on
individual levels that turned Russia towards that fate; not any conspiracy
that transcended individual lack of values.

The point of the Soviet Union and of China was not
to promote atheism, but to promote the supremacy of the State.

No. I think that it was to alleviate human suffering and complaints by
people from unjust circumstances.

The supremacy of the State guaranteed the power of the ruling class, and

that was the

goal of the whole exercise.

No. The state became the people of the revolution who lacked the values to
look up for God instead of earthly rewards. Those people thought that every
good thing they did was to their glory. The children in Russia were
indoctrinated in schools to take pride in calling themselves the children of
Lenin.

Of course China hasn't crumbled. It may yet grow and adapt. If it doesn't

adapt to the

human desire for religion, it too may crumble under the pressure of

Christian converts.
Death is not the death of the body rather of the spirit.


I'm sure you know that our goal here is to encourage everyone to think
for him/herself.

I am willing to donate for the cause if it were really what's happening
here. Let me ask you something; you are an intelligent person who
speculated at the outset the possibility of a grander scheme for atheist
regimes; have you considered that those who have set this forum up for you
and encouraged the participants in a culture of violence against any
expression of faith truly care to make you "think for yourself"? For
heavens sake my friend, if you think that those who lived under the
Communist regimes were taken advantage of, cannot you see what the people
who set you up in this forum are doing to you? Is the culture of violence a
means for you to become an independent thinker? I myself was an atheist;
but none like what I have seen here. I welcome in my family people who
have doubts regarding faiths, because I believe it to be a healthy
development, but not like what I have seen on this forum. Please wake up
before you become like one of those Russians whom you judged to be fools
that lived under regimes with hidden agendas.

I'm not aware of anyone here holding up Stalin or Mao as an ideal to be

emulated.
But if you had speculated a conspiracy at the beginning why could not you
entertain that those who set you up in this forum and encouraged violence
against any expression of faith are not leading you to the path?

Frankly, I think that the United States is darn close to an atheistic
society.

I agree with your criticism. I myself used to be a socialist until I
figured that what matters is in the heart not in the pocket.

No matter how much lip service is paid to God, I don't see much actual
influence exerted by God or Biblical teachings

I know. But if you are truly seeking to become an independent thinker, do
not measure the Bible by the sinful nature of people around you.

on our national policy
of war when it's intended to protect Americans, or our national media,

which

uses sex and violence to sell absolutely everything, or on our national
priorities,
which set profit above helping the poor and unlucky. What's missing is
the ethical concerns many atheists have about social justice and
helping the disadvantaged.

Don't look after an earthly paradise. The kingdom of God will not come by a
political activity or in a magnificent city; it comes in one's heart.

I'd be curious to know if you think the present administration behaves
the way you'd expect Christians to behave, or the way you'd expect

atheists

to behave.

I only know that people are safe and free in the US; that their rulers are
not jamming them in prison when they express or doubt their faiths.
Other than that "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's."
I did not create the world and I won't attempt to fix it. God owns it and
He knows better how to manage it. Those who fancied they would fix the
world ended up inflicting more harm than good. Do you think that you or I
would care about God's children more than He does? Do you think that
because a poor person was neglected by the society that God has neglected
him/her and that it becomes your burden to save him? No. Every one of us
ought to do what we were commanded to do (Love your neighbor as yourself)
and let God use our little pieces of fish and bread to feed his own people
in his own glory.
God bless you,
www.societopia.net
.
User: "Ordog"

Title: Re: Atheist territorial perceptions and behaviors 15 Jun 2005 02:40:02 AM
societopia.net wrote:

<Grey.Neighbor@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1118729856.638880.145640@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Would you agree that atheist regimes who enforce atheism have an agenda
that transcends atheism?

-snip-

I think that what happened in Russia was that
some pretty genius minds that thought in earthly terms to revolt in the
midst of dark history did not have the values to guide their steps once they
actually get what dreamed was justice. It is the lack of values on
individual levels that turned Russia towards that fate; not any conspiracy
that transcended individual lack of values.

No conspiracies at all! People in general knew what was going on in
their country (better than some Americans do). It is an other matter
that they could not do much about it. You know, dictatorship, etc. It
is very condescending to suggest that they lacked values. Actually
official communist moral was not dissimilar to that of moderate
conservative Christians but without the religious elements. Pornography
was prohibited for example.

The point of the Soviet Union and of China was not
to promote atheism, but to promote the supremacy of the State.


No. I think that it was to alleviate human suffering and complaints by
people from unjust circumstances.

Both statements above are only partially true!

The supremacy of the State guaranteed the power of the ruling class, and

that was the

goal of the whole exercise.

That is wrong. There was really no ruling class as such. Not until the
governments were subverted to "worship" dictators. Privileged minions
of Stalin and Mao and some leading members of the communist party
machinery did manage to climb the economic social ladder. So did some
members of the scientific and cultural elite (providing they did not
rock the boat politically).

No. The state became the people of the revolution who lacked the values to
look up for God instead of earthly rewards. Those people thought that every
good thing they did was to their glory. The children in Russia were
indoctrinated in schools to take pride in calling themselves the children of
Lenin.

People did not alway believe political propaganda that was pushed too
hard (do all Amaricans believe that Iraq had large stockpiles of
WMDs?). That was very true in SU and the satellite communist states.

Of course China hasn't crumbled. It may yet grow and adapt. If it doesn't

adapt to the

human desire for religion, it too may crumble under the pressure of

Christian converts.

I will not prophecise about China.
Do not believe for a moment that the return of religion was the cause
of the fall of SU and its allied states. That is just not true.

Death is not the death of the body rather of the spirit.

That is your religious opinion and nothing more.

I'm sure you know that our goal here is to encourage everyone to think
for him/herself.

I do not think he does! That is a foreign concept to the dynamics of a
religious congregation.

I am willing to donate for the cause if it were really what's happening
here.

What is happening here is that some not quite so moderate Christians
barge in and preach to us and/or threaten us with Hell and Brimstone.
If I had any interest hearing this I could just go to the local church
and attend a Sunday sermon.

Let me ask you something; you are an intelligent person who
speculated at the outset the possibility of a grander scheme for atheist
regimes; have you considered that those who have set this forum up for you
and encouraged the participants in a culture of violence against any
expression of faith truly care to make you "think for yourself"?

You must be dreaming. The worst you had to suffer was faul language.
You have been told in no uncertain terms that this was not the proper
forum to preach about your faith. Anything beyond is in the realm of
paranoia.

For
heavens sake my friend, if you think that those who lived under the
Communist regimes were taken advantage of, cannot you see what the people
who set you up in this forum are doing to you?

You are really pushing here your agenda, even the blind can see that.
You try to equate atheism with things that went wrong in communist
states. You are actually saying: These atheists are communists of the
worst kind!

Is the culture of violence a
means for you to become an independent thinker?

Culture of violence? That is not an atheist or even secular speciality.
Human history is full of it right from the "Biblical" times.
Inquisitions, jihads, Crusades, religious sectarian fighting(remember
Northern Ireland), Taliban, War on "Evil" states, etc.

I myself was an atheist;
but none like what I have seen here.

You only say that to score an undeserved browny point!
And I was a Chatolic. So what?

I welcome in my family people who
have doubts regarding faiths, because I believe it to be a healthy
development, but not like what I have seen on this forum. Please wake up
before you become like one of those Russians whom you judged to be fools
that lived under regimes with hidden agendas.

And so you ending up doing missionary work in a place where that is not
wanted.

I'm not aware of anyone here holding up Stalin or Mao as an ideal to be

emulated.

I am aware of Christians who believe we do!

But if you had speculated a conspiracy at the beginning why could not you
entertain that those who set you up in this forum and encouraged violence
against any expression of faith are not leading you to the path?

Saying untruth twice make it true?

Frankly, I think that the United States is darn close to an atheistic
society.

I wish it was.

I agree with your criticism. I myself used to be a socialist until I
figured that what matters is in the heart not in the pocket.

The second unearned browny point! No you claim you were a socialist.
But it was too capitalistic for your taste so you have became a
missionary preacher.

No matter how much lip service is paid to God, I don't see much actual
influence exerted by God or Biblical teachings

A little study of law books will fix that illusion.

I know. But if you are truly seeking to become an independent thinker, do
not measure the Bible by the sinful nature of people around you.

According to Christianity and the Bible all people are sinful by
nature.

on our national policy
of war when it's intended to protect Americans, or our national media,

which

uses sex and violence to sell absolutely everything, or on our national
priorities,
which set profit above helping the poor and unlucky. What's missing is
the ethical concerns many atheists have about social justice and
helping the disadvantaged.

The above section is a mixture of a little bit of everything:
There is nothing wrong with sex in the society for one who is not of
Christian or Islamic belief.
Violence and war are obvious problems for any form of human society.
Antisocial tendencies among the wealthy are nothing new. But it has
little to do with religion or atheism. You are forgetting that there
are conservative atheists who do not share any sentiments about the
need for social justice and wealth distribution.

Don't look after an earthly paradise. The kingdom of God will not come by a
political activity or in a magnificent city; it comes in one's heart.

You are back to preaching! This becomes too predictable.

I'd be curious to know if you think the present administration behaves
the way you'd expect Christians to behave, or the way you'd expect

atheists

to behave.


I only know that people are safe and free in the US; that their rulers are
not jamming them in prison when they express or doubt their faiths.

Yes, neo-conservative interest groups and/or fundamentalist religious
groups have really nothing to fear now.
But anyone else who is critical of their political and religious agenda
will be silenced. Discrimination against the non religious will spread
unchecked. Unless they are stopped it is only a matter of time. Laws
like the Patriot act do little to protect Americans from the enemy
outside. Censorship laws do not further civil freedoms.

Other than that "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's."

Apparently Jesus said that becasuse Roman soldiers were within earshot
where he was lecturing a group of Jews. The "be subservient to your
worldly ruler" interpretation of this event was propagated by Christian
rulers everywhere.

I did not create the world and I won't attempt to fix it. God owns it and
He knows better how to manage it.

I have snipped the rest.
It was just further preaching in a group that does not want it.
I acknowledge your misguided attempt at missionary work. It was nice.
Goodby and do not come again.
Ordog
"Beware of the man whose God is in the skies." Bernard Shaw
.
User: "societopia.net"

Title: Re: Atheist territorial perceptions and behaviors 15 Jun 2005 06:08:48 AM
"Ordog" <odbok001@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:1118821202.255597.178360@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...

societopia.net wrote:

....

But anyone else who is critical of their political and religious agenda
will be silenced. Discrimination against the non religious will spread
unchecked.

Now you are talking about paranoia. There has never been a time like the
present for non-religious agenda on the public media. The only stories on
the news of work discrimination are not directed at atheists rather at any
manifestation of faith. It seems that you were trying to win some of the
gullible souls who would be quick to sympathize with the underdog.
....

I acknowledge your misguided attempt at missionary work. It was nice.
Goodby and do not come again.

Hello :-)
God bless you,
www.societopia.net
.
User: "thomas p"

Title: Re: Atheist territorial perceptions and behaviors 15 Jun 2005 11:22:43 AM
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:08:48 GMT, "societopia.net"
<societopia@societopia.net> wrote:


"Ordog" <odbok001@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:1118821202.255597.178360@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...

societopia.net wrote:


...

But anyone else who is critical of their political and religious agenda
will be silenced. Discrimination against the non religious will spread
unchecked.


Now you are talking about paranoia. There has never been a time like the
present for non-religious agenda on the public media. The only stories on
the news of work discrimination are not directed at atheists rather at any
manifestation of faith.

Name one liar.

It seems that you were trying to win some of the
gullible souls who would be quick to sympathize with the underdog.

Says the liar for Jesus.
Thomas P.
"Life must be lived forwards but understood backwards"
(Kierkegaard)

.

User: "Ordog"

Title: Re: Atheist territorial perceptions and behaviors 15 Jun 2005 07:34:51 PM
societopia.net wrote:

"Ordog" <odbok001@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:1118821202.255597.178360@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...

societopia.net wrote:


...

But anyone else who is critical of their political and religious agenda
will be silenced. Discrimination against the non religious will spread
unchecked.


Now you are talking about paranoia. There has never been a time like the
present for non-religious agenda on the public media. The only stories on
the news of work discrimination are not directed at atheists rather at any
manifestation of faith. It seems that you were trying to win some of the
gullible souls who would be quick to sympathize with the underdog.

I might not have made myself clear in my argument above. When I talk
about religion and religious forces I do not intend to narrow the
definition to Christianity. In Europe, Australia and in the USA however
Christianity is the dominant form of faith.
I have real concerns about all three major religions of the books.
I am also aware of some other intolerant religious beliefs and whatever
I say about religion applies to all:
Over the last two decades there have more call for censorship, more
violent protests, yes, even burning of books instigated on religious
grounds than the opposite. In fact, outside of China I am not aware of
any incident that went the other way.
In the USA and Australia there are a large number of employers who
refuse to employ the non-religious even in the lowest of jobs. Is this
not discrimination? In the UK and Australia even the slightest public
critique of certain extreme religious practices could draw the wreath
of the law on the person uttering the critique.
Is this all paranoia?

God bless you,
www.societopia.net

Please stop blessing me. Abusing God's name in uncalled for situations
is a sin!
I do not call on Darwin or Einstein to bless you when I finish a
message.
Want to be relevant here?
Let us discuss ATHEISM!
In your opinion how many different form of atheism exist? What are the
problems facing atheists in modern society apart from the religious
opposition? How natural selection and evolution support the atheist way
of thinking? Is social justice relevant for atheists? If yes, how? What
makes an atheist support the political Right or the Left? Etc. Etc.
Etc.
Ordog
"Beware of the man whose God is in the skies." Bernard Shaw
.
User: "societopia.net"

Title: Re: Atheist territorial perceptions and behaviors 15 Jun 2005 11:23:57 PM
"Ordog" <odbok001@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:1118882091.632495.224210@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Over the last two decades...
In fact, outside of China I am not aware of
any incident that went the other way.

Because over the past 2 decades there have not been atheist societies any
more, as there were in the remaining of the past century. They got ravaged
by their own lack of values and the harm they inflicted on people they
claimed to be helping while those people rejected their help. But when they
were still alive, every society had examples; Soviet Union, Russia, Africa,
Asia, South America. All of them had the life style of people disappearing
in the night without a trace in the prison system because they expressed an
item of faith that the ruling class felt had threatened their grip on power.

In the USA and Australia there are a large number of employers who
refuse to employ the non-religious even in the lowest of jobs.
Is this
not discrimination? In the UK and Australia even the slightest public
critique of certain extreme religious practices could draw the wreath
of the law on the person uttering the critique.
Is this all paranoia?

I call it Societopia. Both religions and secular institutions have lived
against the will of God. Both are now competing to create a kingdom of God,
without God. It started from the day that Eve faced the question:
["Did God really say, 'You must not eat from any tree in the Garden'?"]
Genesis 3:1


God bless you,
www.societopia.net


Please stop blessing me. Abusing God's name in uncalled for situations
is a sin!

You misinterpreted it. The beauty of invoking God's blessing is that it is
true regardless of the intentions of the speaker.
["He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the
righteous and the unrighteous."] Matthew 5:45
God bless you,
www.societopia.net
.
User: "thomas p"

Title: Re: Atheist territorial perceptions and behaviors 16 Jun 2005 12:40:49 AM
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 04:23:57 GMT, "societopia.net"
<societopia@societopia.net> wrote:
A long list of insane lies.
Thomas P.
"Life must be lived forwards but understood backwards"
(Kierkegaard)

.






User: "DanielSan"

Title: Re: Atheist territorial perceptions and behaviors 14 Jun 2005 02:18:30 AM
wrote:

Would you agree that atheist regimes who enforce atheism have an agenda

that transcends atheism?

Yes. This goes beyond regular atheism and into the realm of anti-theism.
There are flavors of anti-theism run the gamut from simple what I call
"militant atheism" wherein the anti-theist, such as loadnlock, tells
theists they're wrong, wrong, wrong, for believing in what they believe
in, to "dictatorial anti-theism" such as Pol Pot who commit acts of
genocide against religious people for the sole reason that they are
religious.

The point of the Soviet Union and of China was
not
to promote atheism, but to promote the supremacy of the State.

Right. Atheism had nothing to do with it, unless you're referring to
folks like Pol Pot who's purpose was to destroy religion.
Atheists do not want to destroy religion. We'd have no one to poke fun
at. ;-)
No, I'm joking. Atheists do not want to destroy religion. Religion is
okay, as long as the theists do not impose their beliefs on us. :-)

The
supremacy
of the State guaranteed the power of the ruling class, and that was the
goal of
the whole exercise. Apparently the people of the Soviet Union and China
weren't
supposed to notice that there WAS a ruling class, but it has certainly
become
clear that such existed. Of course China hasn't crumbled. It may yet
grow and
adapt. If it doesn't adapt to the human desire for religion, it too may
crumble
under the pressure of Christian converts.

The problem with the Soviet Union was not the atheist Gorbachev, but the
militant religious Soviet breakaway republics. Gorbachev actually
expanded the freedom of religion in Soviet Russia and promoted
democratization of the country.


I'm sure you know that our goal here is to encourage everyone to think
for
him/herself. I'm not aware of anyone here holding up Stalin or Mao as
an
ideal to be emulated.

Indeed. Just as there are bad Christians such as Hitler and bad Muslims
like Osama bin Laden, you can pull out Stalin or Mao as bad atheists.


Frankly, I think that the United States is darn close to an atheistic
society.

The correct terminology is "secular," which means "not specifically
relating to religion."

No matter how much lip service is paid to God, I don't see much actual
influence exerted by God or Biblical teachings on our national policy
of war
when it's intended to protect Americans,

Some Americans (myself included) think that the curent leader of the
United States is using religion as a weapon. I mean, he said, "God told
me to strike at al Qaida and I struck them, and then he instructed me to
strike at Saddam, which I did, and now I am determined to solve the
problem in the Middle East."
It seems pretty clear to me.

or our national media, which
uses
sex and violence to sell absolutely everything,

I don't know about that. I see many car commercials that just show the
car driving down a road covered in leaves. No sex or violence there.
Also, I'm not sure how many people find Mr Clean sexy. ;-)

or on our national
priorities,
which set profit above helping the poor and unlucky. What's missing is
the ethical concerns many atheists have about social justice and
helping the disadvantaged.

I'd be curious to know if you think the present administration behaves
the
way you'd expect Christians to behave, or the way you'd expect atheists

to behave.

Actually, I think that the present administration behaves neither like a
Christian nor an atheist. Air America Radio came up with a good term
for folks like those in the present administration:
Fristians.
.


User: "Graham Kennedy"

Title: Re: Atheist territorial perceptions and behaviors 14 Jun 2005 02:51:53 AM
societopia.net wrote:

"Graham Kennedy" <graham@ditl.org> wrote in message
news:Gqnre.5789$Vj3.3471@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...

societopia.net wrote:



...

Do you know of examples
in history of a culture that was atheist


No.



Have you ever wondered why?

Frequently. The vast bulk of Humanity seems to have a need
to believe in some form of religion or deity; I find this
fact almost literally incredible, and have struggled to
understand why for many years.

May I suggest examining the values of building
tolerant societies? What would one do if one faced an opposing will? Where
does the value of human life as sacred come from?

I strongly doubt that people adopt religion because it
produces a tolerant society. If anything, religion
seems for the most part to me to be an inherently
exclusive, non-tolerant system.
Most religions proclaim that they have a holy truth
that is unchallangeable, and anybody who believes
differently is wrong. Religion's attitude to those
who believe differently varies from "live and let
live" through "preach and convert" and on up to
"burn the heretic!", but the live and let live end
tends to be in a minority, at least historically.
One can hardly describe the crusades or the burning
of witches or the inquisition as tolerant.
It's true that religions tend to be a lot more tolerant
this last century or so - at least most of them - but
I see this more as a consequence of the rise of
rationality and consequent loss of influence of religion
over politics than anything.

Well I don't live in the US, but "my house" is an atheist
territory and the bible is not welcome here. Not that I
actively try to bar it - to be honest the issue has never
come up, I don't think I've ever met a person that carried
a bible around with them. And if somebody really wanted to
bring a bible in I suppose I'd let them. But it wouldn't
be welcome, it would be tolerated.


Thanks for such a tolerant expression.

My pleasure.

This is what I did not encounter
here. If you search for my first message on this forum you would find that
all I did was writing "God bless you" after a few quotation from the Bible
and... what do you know? I witnessed a barrage of profanity and violent
language. Now, I look down the list of respondents on any thread and skip
out reading those from people whose language I already read.

Hmm. You have to realise, theists who post here are
often quite condescending towards us atheists.
I've said before, there are two basic things that
people can mean by "I'll pray for you". It can mean
"I believe prayer is a positive, helpful thing and I
care about you so I want to help", but it can also
mean "you are obviously wrong and lost in your
beliefs and deserve pity, and I hope you come to
think like I do soon because I'm superior to you".
You may have had the first in mind, but many theists
who come here come with the second in mind - duke
and Jason Gastricht spring to mind.
As a result, a lot of people here tend to shoot first
and ask questions later in response to "I'll pray
for you".
Also, proselytising is considered off topic in this
group even if it is meant kindly.

If you were in other parts in the world, are there atheist territories


in

your country today that you know of where one should be warned not to


speak

the Bible in? Have you visited them? If so can you describe your
experience?


I can't really say that I know of an "atheist territory"
in the world. It depends on what you mean by that term.
Is an atheist territory one populated only by atheists?
If so then I doubt such a place exists.



Well, atheist regimes, such as Russia and China built all kind of barriers
around their people from accessing religion.

Actually I've heard that the idea of Russia as a place
where religion was forbidden is largely mythical. I've
known people who lived in Russia during the bad old days
and said that nobody particularly cared if you went to
church or not. The government officially condemned
religion, but that was about it.
China I don't know about, but China is a booming,
successful country today. It certainly has its faults,
but it can hardly be described as crumbling through
the lack of values!

It seems that the most
insecure societies were atheist and they crumbled on their own out of lack
of values. Just look at Russia today; people are living in their little
apartments behind iron doors because they are afraid someone from their
community might come with a machine gun and shoot them only to collect a few
rubles. This is what happened when people lived for long time thinking
that they can build societies without values (which are of the spirit).

I don't think lack of values had much to do with the
fall of "communist" Russia. It was more their economic
difficulties; they built a system whose economic basis
was at odds with reality. Worse, they then devoted a
massive share of their resources to the military in
an attempt to keep up with the west.

Thanks again for being the second decent writer to respond to my messages.

No problem.
--
Graham Kennedy
Creator and Author,
Daystrom Institute Technical Library
http://www.ditl.org
.




  Page 2 of 2

1

 

2

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3801     pg.2109     pg.1169     pg.647     pg.357     pg.196     pg.107     pg.58     pg.31     pg.16     pg.8     pg.4     pg.2

OLDER