| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"|-|erc" |
| Date: |
10 Jan 2005 02:29:34 PM |
| Object: |
ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS |
Australias Skeptic Society FAQ V1.0 Last Revised Jan 2005
Monthly distribution sci.skeptic alt.atheism alt.astrology alt.paranormal alt.usenet.kooks
1 The impression that Australian Skeptics (AS) had "backed-down" CLAIMBREAKERS
2 But using AS money MINE
3 Defining in detail precisely what it is that s/he believes PRECISE DETAIL
4 We must know BARRY WILL TAKE CARE OF IT
5 Believe that we should offer our prize for a test MINE MINE MINE
6 They had approached Bond's English Literature ME ME ME
7 Not for our money MINE MINE MINE
8 We did not want to be seen to be hounding a deluded WE DIDN'T CALL HIM DELUDED
9 this made perfect sense BUT HE IS
10 As a naked statement and was totally irrelevant MISQUOTER
11 Not make a good story OF A FOOL
12 Every question, was that "the Skeptics are backing down GET THE HINT?
13 Opportunity to confess that we have indeed backed down OH REALLY?
14 Solving Fermat's Last Theorem WE'LL LEAVE IT WITH YOU
15 A challenger must make a specific and testable claim directly to AS. NOT PRECISE & DETAILED?
16 It's our challenge, our money MINE MINE MINE
17 By both the Skeptics and the challenger THEY'LL WORK OUT A TEST USING PSYCHIC
POWERS AFTER THEY KILLFILTER YOU
18 The Skeptics Challenge is NOT EXISTANT
19 Someone can put one over the Skeptics THEY JUST DID ON NATIONAL TV
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A Current Affair exposes Barry Williams, Australia Skeptic Society http://tinyurl.com/5q9tc
http://www.skeptics.com.au/features/press/aca.htm
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE : 20 June 2003
Contact Barry Williams : (
The Things that You're Liable to See on the Box that Ain't Necessarily So
The plain facts about Australian Skeptics' testing of Dennis Puffet on A Current Affair
TV viewers who saw a story on A Current Affair (ACA) on Tuesday, June 17 might have been left with
the impression that Australian Skeptics (AS) had "backed-down" from testing a "healer", one Dennis
<<1 Australia Skeptics backed down>>
Puffet. That impression, fostered by ACA both in its advertising and on air, is wrong. At no stage
has Australian Skeptics ever had an agreement with Dennis Puffet, nor with anyone else, to conduct
a formal test of his alleged paranormal abilities. Any charge of our backing down is blatantly
untrue and neither Mr Puffet nor A Current Affair has any reason to suppose otherwise.
Trying to be scrupulously fair to ACA, they might have initially convinced themselves (mistakenly)
that they had the rights to run a test for the Skeptics $100,000 challenge under their own rules
(but using AS money) while ignoring any sort of controlled conditions. However, long before this
<<2 The money is donated by noted members of public>>
segment went to air, ACA was left with no legitimate excuse for continuing to so believe.
Since the first story was shown, and before the offending segment, AS engaged in voluminous
correspondence (telephone and email) with ACA in which we explained the rules, in great detail,
under which such a test could take place. The first such rule is that a claimant must make a
written submission to AS, clearly defining in detail precisely what it is that s/he believes s/he
<<3 This is a copout, 'clearly defining paranormal in detail' is not the 1st step of the proposed
scientific method stated on the website>>
<<clearly-defining-paranormal-in-detail is used as evidence of mental illness to imprison people>>
<<Randi Org and A.S.S. application procedure are to state *a brief summary of the power*>>
You first apply in writing, clearly stating what you are claiming to be able to do.
Representatives from the Australian Skeptics will work with you to define a suitable,
and mutually agreeable, test procedure
can do. We must know this before we can even begin to decide whether the claims are testable and,
<<4 'We' is a lie, Barry denies applications without showing the committee, as opposed to the conditions,
he has admitted this>>
if so, how they can be tested. It hardly needs stating that waving one's hands around on TV and
apocryphal testimonials do not constitute such a claim.
At no time have we received any such claim from Mr Puffet, however we did relax the rule
sufficiently to allow ACA to present some claims on his behalf. This came to us just two days
before the interview with Richard Saunders and Barry Williams which were shown in the June 17
story. What the ACA story did not say was that when the written claims from Mr Puffet were
received, one of Puffet's stipulations was that he would regard anything he wanted to as a success,
whether or not the subject of the healing knew it! He would also recognise nothing as a failure.
The "Pure Healing Energy and Cosmic Harmonic Resonance" (his terms) were only using him as a
conduit and he was not responsible for anything (though he did have them on tap just by thinking of
them). There were other equally vague and barely coherent claims and quite obviously there was no
way we could design any sort of objective test of them.
We informed ACA of this, but they constantly strove to push us into putting up the money to test
Puffet and to break our own rules. It soon became clear that they were working to a story deadline
and were not at all interested in whether or not the test would be valid. When we didn't agree to
that, they charged ahead with the story regardless. Several emails were sent to them spelling out
that at no stage would we be backing out, rather that we intended to follow the correct procedure,
just as we would for anyone else. We even offered to provide ACA with advice on how to conduct
their own test for their own money if the deadline was of such importance (and to save them from
throwing away their money in a flawed test) but these offers were ignored. Furthermore, they
informed us that they had come to an agreement with Bond University to conduct a test on Puffet,
while still seeming to believe that we should offer our prize for a test in which we had no input
whatsoever. Naturally we declined this kind offer.
<<5 its not your money, it has contractual beneficiery>>
At this point the issue entered the realm of pure farce. ACA told us that as Puffet would not agree
to being tested by a scientist (who would be biased), they had approached Bond's English Literature
department. Seldom have our ghasts been more flabbered.
<<6 the rules state an independant umpire will make the final decision, what is wrong with University lecturers?>>
It appears that not only is the claimant allowed to nominate his own (very open ended) criteria for
success or failure, he is also allowed to dictate who can supervise the testing and the right to
veto anyone who might be expected to be capable of designing a scientific test. Not for our money
he isn't.
<<7 its not your money, it belongs to any person who can prove paranormal on media camera>>
During the on-camera interviews, during which Richard was recorded for 15-20 minutes and Barry for
around 5, we constantly reiterated that we had NOT agreed to test Puffet under these conditions,
but we were still perfectly willing to test him IF he ever made a testable claim that could be
objectively validated. None of this went to air. In fact, of all the things Richard said on-camera,
the only thing he was shown saying was that we did not want to be seen to be hounding a deluded
<<8 A.C.A. exposed Australia Skeptic C.E.O. for calling applicants deluded for believing in paranormal>>
individual. While this made perfect sense within the context of what else Richard had been saying,
<<9 if it quacks.... the man has no shame, he's one of you atheist mob who writes the skeptic pamphlets
you read to find new people to laugh at>>
it made none at all when it was shown as a naked statement and was totally irrelevant to everything
else in the piece as shown.
<<10 this is guy who quoted a sarchastic signature of mine, a comment box suggestion 'you ripped me off',
and a 'reply ASAP' on a letter, into the one sentence. a professional editor who puts claimants in
prison by rewording paranormal suppportive arguments into Extortion.>>
At times when we were not being taped, the interviewer agreed with our stand but intimated that it
would not make a good story. The only story that interested her, and the one to which she directed
<<11 you are sad sack of ***** of a story barry>>
every question, was that "the Skeptics are backing down". Clearly this approach had been decided
<<12 the skeptics have backed down>>
long before the interviews and no inconvenient facts were going to be allowed to interfere with the
story.
To say we are more than a little disappointed at this treatment, by A Current Affair would be a
mild understatement. By supplying them with good stories and expert speakers on skeptical topics,
we have maintained a friendly relationship with ACA over those years when they could be regarded as
a serious investigative current affairs programme. But now we have learnt a valuable lesson about
dealing with them in this new era of tabloid media. On the positive side, we are heartened by the
amount of messages of support we have received from thoughtful viewers who expressed their disgust
at what they saw as a blatant set-up.
If, however, we are to regard the ACA rules as applying to everything we do, we had better take
this opportunity to confess that we have indeed backed down on the following issues:
<<13 Confession is good for the soul >>
Peace in the Middle-East
Landing a man on Mars by 2020
Solving Fermat's Last Theorem
<<14 solved in 1995 you lying ***** for brains>>
Overcoming the salinity problem in rural Australia
Tracking down that man behind the Grassy Knoll.
Briefly the rules for a Skeptics Challenge are as follows:
A challenger must make a specific and testable claim directly to AS.
<<15 or whatever>>
The challenge testing must always remain under the control of AS (it's our challenge, our money,
our rules).
<<16 you think you own the money don't you Barry, you call paranormal claimants theifs too >>
Before a test goes ahead, the protocol for any challenge test must be mutually agreed to as a fair
test by both the Skeptics and the challenger. All that is required of claimants is that they can
demonstrate their claimed abilities under these conditions. For this they can earn $100,000 at
minimal cost to themselves.
<<17 if you can get past the mail filter soon as they decline to do a test>>
The Skeptics Challenge is NOT a game of chance, a bet that someone can put one over the Skeptics,
<<18 The challenger must beat million to one odds against a chance result>>
nor one that can be decided on purely subjective criteria. The Challenge is a serious attempt to
investigate whether or not popular paranormal beliefs have any substance. It something that
requires testing, objectively, by rigorously using the tools of science, not because it makes an
entertaining story.
Barry Williams C.E.O Australian Skeptics Inc
Richard Saunders President Australian Skeptics Inc
<<19 get these blatant heathen god hating paranormal farce spectacle makers out of office>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contact List | PGP Keys - Copyright © 1996-2003 Australian Skeptics Inc.
Page Last Updated: 03-May-2003 12:01 +1100
<<MORE LIES you cut out your confession about failing to solve FLT, and didn't update
the Page last updated, and now the server is moved, a website rebuild wont cover this
public statement up.>>
SKEPTIC CEO CAUGHT OUT LYING IN PRINT ON FOUR OCCASIONS
POLICE TAKE HIS WORD IN COURT
--
I am The Truman of Jim Carrey fame. Please help stop me being tortured since April 2002
with constant microwave laser from the Truman satelite splitting my head and tormenting me
and people around me. No I am not crazy, The Truman Show made you think that
.
|
|
| User: "JPG" |
|
| Title: Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS |
10 Jan 2005 04:41:03 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 00:29:34 +1000, "|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote:
Australias Skeptic Society FAQ V1.0 Last Revised Jan 2005
Monthly distribution sci.skeptic alt.atheism alt.astrology alt.paranormal alt.usenet.kooks
Snipped unread due to all caps subject header.
FOAD
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS |
10 Jan 2005 08:31:25 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 00:29:34 +1000, "|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote:
No I am not crazy
Yes, you are.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "CQMMAN" |
|
| Title: Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS |
10 Jan 2005 02:49:02 PM |
|
|
|-|erc <h@r.c> wrote:
Hey, aren't you that nutcase who claims to be psychic?
--
Saddam has continued to produce them, that he has existing and active
military plans for the use of chemical and biological weapons, which
could be activated within 45 minutes
- Tony Blair on Saddam 24/9/02
"For a century and a half now, America and Japan have formed one of the
great and enduring alliances of modern times."
George W Bush -Tokyo, Japan, Feb. 18, 2002
suicide bombing is not a belief
-CrazyAlec (internet spook)
"I hear there's rumors on the Internets"
- George W Bush -Oct. 9, 2004
Even today I am willing to volunteer to do the dirty work for Israel, to
kill as many Arabs as necessary, to deport them, to expel and burn
them, to have everyone hate us, to pull the rug from underneath the
feet of the Diaspora Jews, so that they will be forced to run to us
crying. Even if it means blowing up one or two synagogues here and
there, I don't care. -- Ariel Sharon, interviewed by Amos Oz (published
in the Israeli daily Davar, DEC 17, 1982
.
|
|
|
| User: "kathryn" |
|
| Title: Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS |
10 Jan 2005 03:48:15 PM |
|
|
"CQMMAN" <cqmman@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:34fiv4F4b8ejjU1@individual.net...
|-|erc <h@r.c> wrote:
Hey, aren't you that nutcase who claims to be psychic?
--
I think it might be
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS |
10 Jan 2005 03:51:33 PM |
|
|
I am The Truman of Jim Carrey fame. Please help stop me being tortured since April 2002
with constant microwave laser from the Truman satelite splitting my head and tormenting me
and people around me. Not a prank, I am not crazy, The Truman Show made you think that
---------------------------------------------s-o-s-----------------------------------------
"kathryn" <bob@bobbybobbobthebobster.com> wrote in
"CQMMAN" <cqmman@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:34fiv4F4b8ejjU1@individual.net...
|-|erc <h@r.c> wrote:
Hey, aren't you that nutcase who claims to be psychic?
--
I think it might be
I recognise this newbie slag from last week, filthy fucking skanks in that mob of trash
got the mouths of whores but nothing to match
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "kathryn" |
|
| Title: Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS |
10 Jan 2005 04:50:47 PM |
|
|
"|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote in message news:34fmjgF493ue6U1@individual.net...
I am The Truman of Jim Carrey fame. Please help stop me being tortured
since April 2002
with constant microwave laser from the Truman satelite splitting my head
and tormenting me
and people around me. Not a prank, I am not crazy, The Truman Show made
you think that
---------------------------------------------s-o-s-----------------------------------------
"kathryn" <bob@bobbybobbobthebobster.com> wrote in
"CQMMAN" <cqmman@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:34fiv4F4b8ejjU1@individual.net...
|-|erc <h@r.c> wrote:
Hey, aren't you that nutcase who claims to be psychic?
--
I think it might be
I recognise this newbie slag from last week, filthy fucking skanks in
that mob of trash
got the mouths of whores but nothing to match
Herc
You don't even make sense. Would it be possible for you to even try to form
a coherent sentence? I doubt it. Try insulting me when you have better
grasp of the english language little man.
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS |
10 Jan 2005 04:58:27 PM |
|
|
I recognise this newbie slag from last week, filthy fucking skanks in
that mob of trash
got the mouths of whores but nothing to match
Herc
You don't even make sense. Would it be possible for you to even try to form
a coherent sentence? I doubt it. Try insulting me when you have better
grasp of the english language little man.
Is that the little english language as opposed to the big English language?
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "kathryn" |
|
| Title: Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS |
10 Jan 2005 05:51:39 PM |
|
|
"|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote in message news:34fqgvF4aggl0U1@individual.net...
I recognise this newbie slag from last week, filthy fucking skanks in
that mob of trash
got the mouths of whores but nothing to match
Herc
You don't even make sense. Would it be possible for you to even try to
form
a coherent sentence? I doubt it. Try insulting me when you have better
grasp of the english language little man.
Is that the little english language as opposed to the big English
language?
Herc
Did it make sense?
Yes!
I'm one up on you then typos aside.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS |
10 Jan 2005 03:07:01 PM |
|
|
I am The Truman of Jim Carrey fame. Please help stop me being tortured since April 2002
with constant microwave laser from the Truman satelite splitting my head and tormenting me
and people around me. Not a prank, I am not crazy, The Truman Show made you think that
---------------------------------------------s-o-s-----------------------------------------
|-|erc <h@r.c> wrote:
Hey, aren't you that nutcase who claims to be psychic?
I didn't write that.
Herc
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS |
10 Jan 2005 04:36:20 PM |
|
|
In our last episode <34fiv4F4b8ejjU1@individual.net>, CQMMAN lept out of
the bushes shouting:
|-|erc <h@r.c> wrote:
Hey, aren't you that nutcase who claims to be psychic?
That's him. Claims that his life is the "real" version of the movie "The
Truman Show."
(We're talking *waaaaaay out there that guy)
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful."
-- Seneca the Younger
.
|
|
|
| User: " jls" |
|
| Title: Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS |
10 Jan 2005 06:12:44 PM |
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:P9qdnfo3C-JxMH_cRVn-gg@megapath.net...
In our last episode <34fiv4F4b8ejjU1@individual.net>, CQMMAN lept out of
the bushes shouting:
|-|erc <h@r.c> wrote:
Hey, aren't you that nutcase who claims to be psychic?
That's him. Claims that his life is the "real" version of the movie "The
Truman Show."
(We're talking *waaaaaay out there that guy)
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful."
-- Seneca the Younger
I always liked skeptics and atheists, for the most part because of their
levelheadedness. Never did care much for slanty fuckheads or the xian
right, though.
As this is not legal, I trimmed ML because it's off-topic.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS |
10 Jan 2005 04:45:33 PM |
|
|
I am The Truman of Jim Carrey fame. Please help stop me being tortured since April 2002
with constant microwave laser from the Truman satelite splitting my head and tormenting me
and people around me. Not a prank, I am not crazy, The Truman Show made you think that
---------------------------------------------s-o-s-----------------------------------------
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in
In our last episode <34fiv4F4b8ejjU1@individual.net>, CQMMAN lept out of
the bushes shouting:
|-|erc <h@r.c> wrote:
Hey, aren't you that nutcase who claims to be psychic?
That's him. Claims that his life is the "real" version of the movie "The
Truman Show."
(We're talking *waaaaaay out there that guy)
I am the Truman you fuckhead. 10,000 witnesses know it.
You let me get tortured incase you thought these are fake.
T R U e M A N W I T N E S S E S
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dksqpv41597ofbhr16mi7tdj2qfihvoldv%404ax.com
Hey Trueman...
what up, my uncle told me you post here... he's did some audio on your
secret show and gave me some tapes. love the show.
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=1epmdv8iqmnckeqhctnf17537rt8hevjeh%404ax.com
You rule Truman.
http://www.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=9aqbbv85c53jobkenltkil2tbsdk7m2n3p@4ax.com
I was in Townsville over the weekend, and I heard him.
Very spooky!
http://www.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=me7hbv4snqc6gnb1cktj3cvqtiibnpm6s9@4ax.com
I'm from Townsville and YOU ARE the Truman
http://www.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=3eb66422.779705967@news.ozemail.com.au
I'm in Townsville. We're sick of you
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=Pine.OSF.4.21.0309230859190.5384-100000%40marlin.jcu.edu.au
Do you know if the truman is living in Townsville?
I've been hearing stuff, yeah.
From: Les Norton (Les.Norton@spamfree.com.au)
Subject: OT: RESULTS: Herc-Truman test
Anyhow, not scientific proof, but a bloody good effort anyway.
BTW, when I was in The Strand last weekend, I didn't hear your broadcast per
se. Well, at least I thought I didn't. Again, who knows? LOL.
Anyhow, you think your the Truman. So WTF, I think you're the Truman too.
"Therefore 100,000 Townsville residents and 1 Melbourne tourist can't be
wrong".
.
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS |
10 Jan 2005 08:32:37 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 02:45:33 +1000, "|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote:
T R U e M A N W I T N E S S E S
They're making fun of you, idiot.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chris Krolczyk" |
|
| Title: Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS |
10 Jan 2005 11:05:29 PM |
|
|
raven1 wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 02:45:33 +1000, "|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote:
T R U e M A N W I T N E S S E S
They're making fun of you, idiot.
He doesn't *understand* that, of course.
It's just another sign that TH3 TR00MAN
is about as daft as daft can get, of course.
-Chris Krolczyk
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS |
10 Jan 2005 07:11:15 PM |
|
|
|-|erc wrote:
I am The Truman of Jim Carrey fame. Please help stop me being
tortured since April 2002
with constant microwave laser from the Truman satelite splitting my
head and tormenting me
and people around me. Not a prank, I am not crazy, The Truman Show
made you think that
---------------------------------------------s-o-s> > >
Hey, aren't you that nutcase who claims to be psychic?
That's him. Claims that his life is the "real" version of the movie
"The
Truman Show."
(We're talking *waaaaaay out there that guy)
I am the Truman you fuckhead. 10,000 witnesses know it.
I can't wait until the next american civil war so I can legally kill
nutcases like you, so, I will put you out of your misery for any
generous sum. Donations accepted.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Harry F. Leopold" |
|
| Title: Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS |
11 Jan 2005 01:30:54 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:11:15 -0600, wrote
(in article <1105384275.948938.277410@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>):
-|erc wrote:
I am The Truman of Jim Carrey fame. Please help stop me being
tortured since April 2002
with constant microwave laser from the Truman satelite splitting my
head and tormenting me
and people around me. Not a prank, I am not crazy, The Truman Show
made you think that
---------------------------------------------s-o-s> > >
Hey, aren't you that nutcase who claims to be psychic?
That's him. Claims that his life is the "real" version of the movie
"The
Truman Show."
(We're talking *waaaaaay out there that guy)
I am the Truman you fuckhead. 10,000 witnesses know it.
I can't wait until the next american civil war so I can legally kill
nutcases like you, so, I will put you out of your misery for any
generous sum. Donations accepted.
erk is not an American, he is in Australia.
--
Harry F. Leopold
aa #2076
AA/Vet #4
The Prints of Darkness
(remove gene to email)
America, making tomorrow's terrorists today.
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS |
11 Jan 2005 01:40:10 PM |
|
|
I am The Truman of Jim Carrey fame. Please help stop me being tortured since April 2002
with constant microwave laser from the Truman satelite splitting my head and tormenting me
and people around me. Not a prank, I am not crazy, The Truman Show made you think that
---------------------------------------------s-o-s-----------------------------------------
"Harry F. Leopold" <hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote in message
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:11:15 -0600, wrote
(in article <1105384275.948938.277410@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>):
-|erc wrote:
I am The Truman of Jim Carrey fame. Please help stop me being
tortured since April 2002
with constant microwave laser from the Truman satelite splitting my
head and tormenting me
and people around me. Not a prank, I am not crazy, The Truman Show
made you think that
---------------------------------------------s-o-s> > >
Hey, aren't you that nutcase who claims to be psychic?
That's him. Claims that his life is the "real" version of the movie
"The
Truman Show."
(We're talking *waaaaaay out there that guy)
I am the Truman you fuckhead. 10,000 witnesses know it.
I can't wait until the next american civil war so I can legally kill
nutcases like you, so, I will put you out of your misery for any
generous sum. Donations accepted.
erk is not an American, he is in Australia.
right, US trillion dollar media empire AKA the truman show is going to let that slip.
you wont get within 1,000 miles of me with that thought in your head. every little
homosexual fantasy you have tonight will be uploaded to the pentagon until they
have 20GB of your brain activity enough to take you down in a second.
not to mention nobody on usenet has managed to correct my spelling yet without fumbling.
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS |
11 Jan 2005 07:32:02 PM |
|
|
|-|erc wrote:
I am The Truman of Jim Carrey fame. Please help stop me being
tortured since April 2002
I am the Truman you fuckhead. 10,000 witnesses know it.
I can't wait until the next american civil war so I can legally
kill
nutcases like you, so, I will put you out of your misery for any
generous sum. Donations accepted.
erk is not an American, he is in Australia.
you wont get within 1,000 miles of me with that thought in your head.
every little
homosexual fantasy you have tonight will be uploaded to the pentagon
until they
have 20GB of your brain activity enough to take you down in a second.
Herc
No problem, I'm on my way, you might want put your affairs in order,
did you pick out a headstone yet or are you to be cremated?
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS |
12 Jan 2005 02:24:44 AM |
|
|
No problem, I'm on my way, you might want put your affairs in order,
did you pick out a headstone yet or are you to be cremated?
and what if you get close to me and hear the mind probe, knowing I was telling
the trVth all along?
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS |
12 Jan 2005 02:28:58 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:24:44 +1000, "|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote:
and what if you get close to me and hear the mind probe, knowing I was telling
the trVth all along?
Contrary to what you might want to imagine, your auditory
hallucinations aren't audible to anyone else.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Chris Krolczyk" |
|
| Title: Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS |
13 Jan 2005 01:29:24 AM |
|
|
|-|erc wrote:
right, US trillion dollar media empire AKA the truman show is going
to let that slip.
So why aren't you on TV up here right *now*, Herc?
Are all of those women you've stalked lining up
around the block waiting for you to finger-bang
them or something?
(misc.legal snipped for obvious reasons.)
-Chris Krolczyk
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS |
13 Jan 2005 02:04:43 AM |
|
|
--------------------------------------s-o-s------------------------------------
"Chris Krolczyk" <chriskrolczyk@hotmail.com> wrote in ...
|-|erc wrote:
right, US trillion dollar media empire AKA the truman show is going
to let that slip.
So why aren't you on TV up here right *now*, Herc?
Are all of those women you've stalked lining up
around the block waiting for you to finger-bang
them or something?
(misc.legal snipped for obvious reasons.)
-Chris Krolczyk
because Tom Cruise and Mel Gibson and David Duchovny and Sean Penn
and Jim Carrey play me. What would you rather watch, one channel of God TV
or 57 channels with altheism on?
I'm the computer animated man in final fantasy if you must know, remember his
pecs stuck out and his name went from Cray to Gray half way through.
http://www.supernerd.com.au/~gray77/muscle-pic.gif
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chris Krolczyk" |
|
| Title: Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS |
19 Jan 2005 01:23:54 AM |
|
|
|-|erc wrote:
--------------------------------------s-o-s------------------------------------
"Chris Krolczyk" <chriskrolczyk@hotmail.com> wrote in ...
|-|erc wrote:
right, US trillion dollar media empire AKA the truman show is
going
to let that slip.
So why aren't you on TV up here right *now*, Herc?
Are all of those women you've stalked lining up
around the block waiting for you to finger-bang
them or something?
(misc.legal snipped for obvious reasons.)
-Chris Krolczyk
because Tom Cruise and Mel Gibson and David Duchovny and Sean Penn
and Jim Carrey play me.
*Snicker*
Excuse me for a moment, but...
BWWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!!!
"Oh, look! I'm so earthshakingly
important (and sexy, to boot) that
I have to be played by Cruise *and*
Gibson, Duchovny, Penn and Carrey!"
That's some incredible sense of
hubris you've got there. Really.
What would you rather watch, one channel of God TV
or 57 channels with altheism on?
This isn't a "channel", dimbulb.
You also seem blissfully unaware of
your crossposting this to more than
one newsgroup, BTW. It's not the only
thing you're blissfully unaware of,
but hey...
I'm the computer animated man in final fantasy if you must know,
remember his
pecs stuck out and his name went from Cray to Gray half way through.
And this proves what, exactly...?
(And did anyone else read "Crazy" for "Cray"
in the above sentence? It seems appropo.)
-Chris Krolczyk
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS |
19 Jan 2005 02:52:48 AM |
|
|
http://www.supernerd.com.au/~gray77/muscle-pic.gif
don't snip my muscle pic,
and YES you will get your chance to read out aloud everything you've writen to me face to face
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chris Krolczyk" |
|
| Title: Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS |
21 Jan 2005 12:58:58 AM |
|
|
|-|erc wrote:
http://www.supernerd.com.au/~gray77/muscle-pic.gif
don't snip my muscle pic,
Just looks like a crappy, badly pixellated .gif to me.
What's your point?
and YES you will get your chance to read out aloud everything
you've writen to me face to face
Who're you addressing, Herc? Me?
If *that's* the case, I'm sure that the immigration
people here in the US would love to know about your
repeated threats to poison food and kill people
you don't like, especially Wally Angelsea. Care to
guess how easily they could bar you from setting
one foot on American soil after that?
-Chris Krolczyk
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS |
21 Jan 2005 01:56:15 AM |
|
|
"Chris Krolczyk" <chriskrolczyk@hotmail.com> wrote in > >
don't snip my muscle pic,
Just looks like a crappy, badly pixellated .gif to me.
What's your point?
and YES you will get your chance to read out aloud everything
you've writen to me face to face
Who're you addressing, Herc? Me?
If *that's* the case, I'm sure that the immigration
people here in the US would love to know about your
repeated threats to poison food and kill people
you don't like, especially Wally Angelsea. Care to
guess how easily they could bar you from setting
one foot on American soil after that?
-Chris Krolczyk
What? you do have 1st hand accounts of this?
Results 1 - 10 of about 1,950 for author:wally author:anglesea KOOK
You do know Wally gets his 2000 Kook ribbon next week?
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chris Krolczyk" |
|
| Title: Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS |
26 Jan 2005 01:39:07 AM |
|
|
|-|erc wrote:
"Chris Krolczyk" <chriskrolczyk@hotmail.com> wrote in > >
don't snip my muscle pic,
Just looks like a crappy, badly pixellated .gif to me.
What's your point?
and YES you will get your chance to read out aloud everything
you've writen to me face to face
Who're you addressing, Herc? Me?
If *that's* the case, I'm sure that the immigration
people here in the US would love to know about your
repeated threats to poison food and kill people
you don't like, especially Wally Angelsea. Care to
guess how easily they could bar you from setting
one foot on American soil after that?
-Chris Krolczyk
What? you do have 1st hand accounts of this?
Don't need 'em. See, there was this thing a while ago
that happened in New York City - something about, oh,
planes being flown by wingnuts into tall, tall, buildings
that resulted in a lot of people getting killed. And
if *that* isn't enough, I get the feeling that our
immigration people talk to your immigration people
on a regular basis about potentially violent headcases
who feel like travelling between those two countries.
Just a hunch.
Results 1 - 10 of about 1,950 for author:wally author:anglesea KOOK
You do know Wally gets his 2000 Kook ribbon next week?
No. Did you know that matching certain set of words
on Google and claiming that the number produced
by that match *always* means something is a sign
that you're probably full of *****?
-Chris Krolczyk
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS |
26 Jan 2005 01:51:13 AM |
|
|
"Chris Krolczyk" <chriskrolczyk@hotmail.com> wrote in >
|-|erc wrote:
"Chris Krolczyk" <chriskrolczyk@hotmail.com> wrote in > >
don't snip my muscle pic,
Just looks like a crappy, badly pixellated .gif to me.
What's your point?
and YES you will get your chance to read out aloud everything
you've writen to me face to face
Who're you addressing, Herc? Me?
If *that's* the case, I'm sure that the immigration
people here in the US would love to know about your
repeated threats to poison food and kill people
you don't like, especially Wally Angelsea. Care to
guess how easily they could bar you from setting
one foot on American soil after that?
-Chris Krolczyk
What? you do have 1st hand accounts of this?
Don't need 'em. See, there was this thing a while ago
that happened in New York City - something about, oh,
planes being flown by wingnuts into tall, tall, buildings
that resulted in a lot of people getting killed. And
if *that* isn't enough, I get the feeling that our
immigration people talk to your immigration people
on a regular basis about potentially violent headcases
who feel like travelling between those two countries.
Just a hunch.
The supreme court judge dismissed the charges, called me 'your honour'
and I have no record for "thankyou for your verrrrry slow reply... ps please reply in
a day or two I'm about to go crazy here the way you're treating me".
Results 1 - 10 of about 1,950 for author:wally author:anglesea KOOK
You do know Wally gets his 2000 Kook ribbon next week?
No. Did you know that matching certain set of words
on Google and claiming that the number produced
by that match *always* means something is a sign
that you're probably full of *****?
au contrare, go to a.u.k. there's rivalry who's got the biggest kook count. one
guy is 16,000. dont forget the k0ok k00k kOOk posts they'll tell you!
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chris Krolczyk" |
|
| Title: Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS |
04 Feb 2005 12:54:03 AM |
|
|
|-|erc wrote:
"Chris Krolczyk" <chriskrolczyk@hotmail.com> wrote in >
|-|erc wrote:
"Chris Krolczyk" <chriskrolczyk@hotmail.com> wrote in > >
don't snip my muscle pic,
Just looks like a crappy, badly pixellated .gif to me.
What's your point?
and YES you will get your chance to read out aloud everything
you've writen to me face to face
Who're you addressing, Herc? Me?
If *that's* the case, I'm sure that the immigration
people here in the US would love to know about your
repeated threats to poison food and kill people
you don't like, especially Wally Angelsea. Care to
guess how easily they could bar you from setting
one foot on American soil after that?
-Chris Krolczyk
What? you do have 1st hand accounts of this?
Don't need 'em. See, there was this thing a while ago
that happened in New York City - something about, oh,
planes being flown by wingnuts into tall, tall, buildings
that resulted in a lot of people getting killed. And
if *that* isn't enough, I get the feeling that our
immigration people talk to your immigration people
on a regular basis about potentially violent headcases
who feel like travelling between those two countries.
Just a hunch.
The supreme court judge dismissed the charges, called me 'your
honour'
and I have no record for "thankyou for your verrrrry slow reply... ps
please reply in
a day or two I'm about to go crazy here the way you're treating me".
And this (probably untruthful) interpretation of what
happened to you in an Aussie court has nothing to
do with what I said about American immigration
policies.
Feel free to re-read what I said: if there's any
reason to believe you're a nutter who's decided
to take your act on an international tour, there's a
very good chance that any - and I repeat, any -
country that doesn't have a sieve for a customs
or immigration agency will *not* let you in.
Period.
Results 1 - 10 of about 1,950 for author:wally author:anglesea
KOOK
You do know Wally gets his 2000 Kook ribbon next week?
No. Did you know that matching certain set of words
on Google and claiming that the number produced
by that match *always* means something is a sign
that you're probably full of *****?
au contrare, go to a.u.k. there's rivalry who's got the biggest kook
count. one
guy is 16,000. dont forget the k0ok k00k kOOk posts they'll tell
you!
Yawn.
-Chris Krolczyk
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS |
04 Feb 2005 01:32:07 AM |
|
|
"Chris Krolczyk" <chriskrolczyk@hotmail.com> wrote in
If *that's* the case, I'm sure that the immigration
people here in the US would love to know about your
repeated threats to poison food and kill people
you don't like, especially Wally Angelsea. Care to
guess how easily they could bar you from setting
one foot on American soil after that?
-Chris Krolczyk
What? you do have 1st hand accounts of this?
Don't need 'em. See, there was this thing a while ago
that happened in New York City - something about, oh,
planes being flown by wingnuts into tall, tall, buildings
that resulted in a lot of people getting killed. And
if *that* isn't enough, I get the feeling that our
immigration people talk to your immigration people
on a regular basis about potentially violent headcases
who feel like travelling between those two countries.
Just a hunch.
The supreme court judge dismissed the charges, called me 'your
honour'
and I have no record for "thankyou for your verrrrry slow reply... ps
please reply in
a day or two I'm about to go crazy here the way you're treating me".
And this (probably untruthful) interpretation of what
happened to you in an Aussie court has nothing to
do with what I said about American immigration
policies.
yes it does. you claimed I have been caught commiting crimes and cannot travel.
the fact I have no criminal record disputes this.
Feel free to re-read what I said: if there's any
reason to believe you're a nutter who's decided
to take your act on an international tour, there's a
very good chance that any - and I repeat, any -
country that doesn't have a sieve for a customs
or immigration agency will *not* let you in.
Period.
the fact Australia has bowed down to US police-state laws and is
going overboard with sarcastic comments in personal mail is enough for me
to move to a country that doesn't imprison people without a conviction.
All I have to do is show the original email to any Embassy in the world if
the matters are brought up.
To The Embassy,
the following is the complete transcript I wrote for the charge of extortion by Australia Skeptic Society.
The prosecution was ordered to halt by Supreme Court.
EXHIBIT 20
Hello, Mr Williams
thankyou for your verrrrrrrrrrrrrrry slow reply,
why don't you reply to my very simply stated claim
i faxed twice and posted with registered mail?
Restated for fourth time:
my claim is to guess peoples names
from what they say write or do
(very simple and other people can't do it
hence paranormal)
Graham
ps please reply in a day or two, i am about to
put ** in as much ***** smith food as i can grab.
From: Barry Williams <skeptics@kasm.com.au>
To:
Subject: Re: FW: hi Barry
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 10:42:05 +1100
Mr ...
Your continuing use of email, fax and registered mail to make your
incomprehensible claims of having paranormal abilities is wasting my time
and your money.
I told you on the occasion you phoned me that if you seek to be tested by
the Skeptics you must write down, clearly and in detail, what it is you
claim to be able to do. You must understand what these details are, given
that you downloaded them from our web site and forwarded them to me. You
have failed to do this. All you have done is to send us copies of totally
irrelevant nonsense you have written on the internet. Further, you failed
utterly to respond to the simple preliminary test I offered, preferring to
reply with even more irrelevant postings.
You have made no testable claim to Australian Skeptics and there will be no
further communication from us. Your use of assumed names and email
addresses, and the pretense of being one of my colleagues, will not work,
nor will your threats that we will have to "face the consequences".
Barry Williams
Executive Officer
Australian Skeprtics Inc
As you can see, the article forged that I wrote OR YOU WILL PAY THE CONSEQUENCES.
And I uploaded this transcript of what the 'extortion' was a reply to on March 4 2002, days
before the arrest and the newspaper article cited me as saying PAY THE CONSEQUENCES.
Fucking fantasy writing.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
