"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:

:"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
:news:szkaclmsyvl.fsf@eris.io.com...
:> "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:

:> :"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
:> :news:szk1x7048jd.fsf@eris.io.com...
:> :> "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:

:> :> :"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
:> :> :news:1118917497.957483.141140@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
:> :> :> ...because if you care enough about your deity to promote It,
you'll
:> :> :> care enough to prove Its existence.

:> :> :Did I say I can prove it? I think I mentioned that I believe it to
be
:> :> :true because of all the evidence that I see to substantiate it to
me and
:> :> :that I never saw any evidence to disprove it.

:> :> It's just a coincidence you flip out when anyone disagrees with your
:> :> hallucinations, right?

:> :Me flipping out?

:> You lost your marbles long ago.

No response? I can see why.

:> :Seems to me that others are flipping out and demanding that I prove
God;s
:> :existence to them.

:> You're the schmuck claiming that he exists.

:Did I type "God exists"? Or did I type, "I know that God exists...."

The latter - which means you just made the positive assertion and then
refused
to back it up with anything but your repeated assertion. So, are you
lying or
are you stupid? Those are the only two answers to that question.

:> Get cracking on it, or stand revealed as a liar.

:You are commanding me to do something?

I have no illusions that a whackjob like you would ever do anything I say.

:The comedic talents of one Patrick Humphrey seem limited, yet I do find
it
:amusing that such a statement would be supposed to have any force in the
:world.

It could,

but I have better things to do with my time than to go after a
lunatic in South Carolina when it's obvious he's the running joke of
Anderson
County. (There's an Anderson County in Texas, as well, but it doesn't
have
the stigma of being home to you. It's roughly halfway between here and
Dallas.)

:> :Even if God were to be proven to them, how do you assume it would be
me
:> :doing it? Can you prove yourself?

:> You've called my home phone and heard my greeting.

:Yes, and it seemed to contain an anti-telemarketing message.

Indeed, and I made that statement in it.

[...]

:> :Understand that asking someone other than the entity who is to be
proven is
:> :not akin to seeking proof from the person you want to be proven.

:> In other words, you're implicity admitting to lying,

:Where did I lie?

You're claiming that your alleged deity exists, and then trying to find an
excuse for not providing any proof of your assertion.

:> and trying to find any excuse to wimp out of providing your proof

:Wimping out? Why do you ask me for proof of someone else?

You're the gibbering loon who's claiming that said someone else exists and
then refusing to prove his assertions.

:> - because you know it can't be done.

:To whose satisfaction? I never said it can't be done.

It's just a coincidence you've never done so.

:> Quelle surprise.

:You're surprised?

That was what should have been obvious sarcasm - but then, you're
obviously
stupid.

(You won't be dialing up my home phone, either. If you do, I'll just
point
the readers to the whois for your domain name, which features your phone
number.)

On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 08:15:33 -0400, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
in alt.abortion with message-id
<qhdte.108926$8S5.69043@bignews3.bellsouth.net> wrote:

"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkaclmsyvl.fsf@eris.io.com...

"Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:

:"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
:news:szk1x7048jd.fsf@eris.io.com...
:> "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> writes:

:> :"Somewriter" <sappywriter@poetic.com> wrote in message
:> :news:1118917497.957483.141140@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
:> :> ...because if you care enough about your deity to promote It,
you'll
:> :> care enough to prove Its existence.

:> :Did I say I can prove it? I think I mentioned that I believe it to
be
:> :true because of all the evidence that I see to substantiate it to me
and
:> :that I never saw any evidence to disprove it.

:> It's just a coincidence you flip out when anyone disagrees with your
:> hallucinations, right?

:Me flipping out?

You lost your marbles long ago.

:Seems to me that others are flipping out and demanding that I prove
God;s
:existence to them.

You're the schmuck claiming that he exists.

Did I type "God exists"?
Or did I type, "I know that God exists...."

Don't you understand they are the same?

Each is an assertion to be
supported.