Attn: Atheists & Skeptics - What's wrong with answersingenesis.com?



 Religions > Atheism > Attn: Atheists & Skeptics - What's wrong with answersingenesis.com?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 119

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 

8

 

9

 

10

 

11

 

12

 

13

 

14

 

15

 

16

 

17

 

18

 

19

 

20

 

21

 

22

 

23

 

24

 

25

 

26

 

27

 

28

 

29

 

30

 

31

 

32

 

33

 

34

 

35

 

36

 

37

 

38

 

39

 

40

 

41

 

42

 

43

 

44

 

45

 

46

 

47

 

48

 

49

 

50

 

51

 

52

 

53

 

54

 

55

 

56

 

57

 

58

 

59

 

60

 

61

 

62

 

63

 

64

 

65

 

66

 

67

 

68

 

69

 

70

 

71

 

72

 

73

 

74

 

75

 

76

 

77

 

78

 

79

 

80

 

81

 

82

 

83

 

84

 

85

 

86

 

87

 

88

 

89

 

90

 

91

 

92

 

93

 

94

 

95

 

96

 

97

 

98

 

99

 

100

 

101

 

102

 

103

 

104

 

105

 

106

 

107

 

108

 

109

 

110

 

111

 

112

 

113

 

114

 

115

 

116

 

117

 

118

 

119

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Jim Spaza"
Date: 10 Jun 2005 09:20:04 PM
Object: Attn: Atheists & Skeptics - What's wrong with answersingenesis.com?
This challenge was issued by GlennGlenn (655321) -- aa#825.
What is wrong with the Christian apologetic website
www.answersingenesis.com ???
Please be courteous and specific.
.

User: "Phÿltêr"

Title: Re: Attn: Atheists & Skeptics - What's wrong with answersingenesis.com? 11 Jun 2005 07:27:18 AM
"Jim Spaza" <spaza9@yahoo.com> astounded us with:
news:1118438404.202621.65610@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

This challenge was issued by GlennGlenn (655321) -- aa#825.

What is wrong with the Christian apologetic website
www.answersingenesis.com ???

Please be courteous and specific.

This is a joke question, right? What's right with it would be a better
question, considering it's all *****.
--
Phÿltêr
AA#1938
Denizen of Darkness #44 & AFJC Antipodean Attaché
Remove "s" to respond
.

User: "Rudy Benner"

Title: Re: Atheists & Skeptics - What's wrong with answersingenesis.com? 10 Jun 2005 09:40:32 PM
"Jim Spaza" <spaza9@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1118438404.202621.65610@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

This challenge was issued by GlennGlenn (655321) -- aa#825.

What is wrong with the Christian apologetic website
www.answersingenesis.com ???

Please be courteous and specific.

PLONK
.
User: "John Baker"

Title: Re: Atheists & Skeptics - What's wrong with answersingenesis.com? 10 Jun 2005 11:37:39 PM
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 17:40:32 -0400, "Rudy Benner"
<newsgroups@rudybenner.com> wrote:


"Jim Spaza" <spaza9@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1118438404.202621.65610@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

This challenge was issued by GlennGlenn (655321) -- aa#825.

What is wrong with the Christian apologetic website
www.answersingenesis.com ???

Please be courteous and specific.


PLONK

Well, that was at least specific. LOL
And, to be honest, probably what Spaza actually deserves.


.
User: "655321"

Title: Re: Atheists & Skeptics - What's wrong with answersingenesis.com? 11 Jun 2005 01:30:04 AM
On 2005-06-10 16:37:39 -0700, John Baker <nunya@bizniz.net> said:

On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 17:40:32 -0400, "Rudy Benner"
<newsgroups@rudybenner.com> wrote:


"Jim Spaza" <spaza9@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1118438404.202621.65610@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

This challenge was issued by GlennGlenn (655321) -- aa#825.

What is wrong with the Christian apologetic website
www.answersingenesis.com ???

Please be courteous and specific.


PLONK


Well, that was at least specific. LOL

And, to be honest, probably what Spaza actually deserves.

That depends, I guess. The guy really isn't a troll, in that he
actuallly sticks around and argues.
His arguments are flawed by his faith, but he argues nonetheless.
And not in the stupid, threatening way that Earl does.
--
GlennGlenn (655321) -- aa#825 --

I am not famous, I am notorious. And if I am rich, it is because I have
taken my wages in people.
- Quentin Crisp
.
User: "John Baker"

Title: Re: Atheists & Skeptics - What's wrong with answersingenesis.com? 11 Jun 2005 02:03:45 AM
On Sat, 11 Jun 2005 01:30:04 GMT, 655321
<DipthotDipthot@Yahoo.Yahoo.Com.Com> wrote:

On 2005-06-10 16:37:39 -0700, John Baker <nunya@bizniz.net> said:

On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 17:40:32 -0400, "Rudy Benner"
<newsgroups@rudybenner.com> wrote:


"Jim Spaza" <spaza9@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1118438404.202621.65610@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

This challenge was issued by GlennGlenn (655321) -- aa#825.

What is wrong with the Christian apologetic website
www.answersingenesis.com ???

Please be courteous and specific.


PLONK


Well, that was at least specific. LOL

And, to be honest, probably what Spaza actually deserves.


That depends, I guess. The guy really isn't a troll, in that he
actuallly sticks around and argues.

His arguments are flawed by his faith, but he argues nonetheless.

And not in the stupid, threatening way that Earl does.

Good for him. A lot of them don't.
I did give him a serious answer to his question regarding AIG, and a
couple of links to where he can get the real story. I'm waiting to see
how he responds.
.




User: "Enkidu the Atheist"

Title: Re: Attn: Atheists & Skeptics - What's wrong with answersingenesis.com? 11 Jun 2005 02:27:25 AM
"Jim Spaza" <spaza9@yahoo.com> wrote in news:1118438404.202621.65610
@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

This challenge was issued by GlennGlenn (655321) -- aa#825.

What is wrong with the Christian apologetic website
www.answersingenesis.com ???

Please be courteous and specific.

Other than the total lack of factual information, the misrepresentation of
scientists, their opinions and their work, and the barbaric moral code it
espouses, nothing.
Why did you cross-post to all these groups? Looks pretty trollish to me.
I've removed all by alt.atheism.
--
Enkidu AA#2165
EAC Chaplin and ordained minister,
ULC, Modesto, CA
A priest is a man who is called "Father" by everyone except his own
children, who are obliged to call him "Uncle."
-- Italian saying
.
User: "Enkidu the Atheist"

Title: Re: Attn: Atheists & Skeptics - What's wrong with answersingenesis.com? 11 Jun 2005 02:29:18 AM
Enkidu the Atheist <Enkidu.the.Atheist@gmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns9671C5F218E91255229@130.133.1.4:

"Jim Spaza" <spaza9@yahoo.com> wrote in news:1118438404.202621.65610
@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

This challenge was issued by GlennGlenn (655321) -- aa#825.

What is wrong with the Christian apologetic website
www.answersingenesis.com ???

Please be courteous and specific.


Other than the total lack of factual information, the
misrepresentation of scientists, their opinions and their work, and
the barbaric moral code it espouses, nothing.

Why did you cross-post to all these groups? Looks pretty trollish to
me. I've removed all by alt.atheism.

Sorry, all. I hit 'send' too soon.
--
Enkidu AA#2165
EAC Chaplin and ordained minister,
ULC, Modesto, CA
"The total absence of humor from the Bible is one of the most singular
things in literature."

* Alfred North Whitehead
(02/15/1861 - 12/30/1947)
English mathematician, philosopher
.


User: "The_Sage"

Title: Re: Attn: Atheists & Skeptics - What's wrong with answersingenesis.com? 13 Jun 2005 11:53:09 PM

Reply to article by: "Jim Spaza" <spaza9@yahoo.com>
Date written: 10 Jun 2005 14:20:04 -0700
MsgID:<1118438404.202621.65610@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
This challenge was issued by GlennGlenn (655321) -- aa#825.
What is wrong with the Christian apologetic website
www.answersingenesis.com ???
Please be courteous and specific.

The biggest flaw of all is that they are blatently and openly biased in their
"research" and conclusions. They choose one particular religion out thousands of
other religions without justifying their choice. If they were going to be
reasonably fair in their judgements, they would judge their own religion by the
same standards they judge evolution. They don't since they aren't interested in
being fair because they are biased in their judgement. But if they did, their
religion would fail miserably, the only difference being that evolution at least
has something physically real to base their explanations with whereas all the
Christians have are their poorly told fairytales. Using their own "logic"
against them from your creation website, if we could find some flaws in the
Christian religion, then that proves the whole religion is false and should be
abandoned, so here goes...
Where does God or Jesus exist? In some invisible physically unknowable
netherworld. In other words, God doesn't exist in the only reality that we know
for a fact exists outside of our imagination. So don't expect to find any
fossils of God or of Jesus because there won't be any. Imaginary things don't
leave physically real evidence behind. Jesus said he would be in the grave for
more than three days and three nights, yet he was only in the grave for two
days and two nights. That makes Jesus a false prophet. The Bible speaks of
things like plants and animals and even stones being able to speak the human
language, or of humans rising from the dead. These kind of things never happen
in real life and cannot happen in real life. It is obviously a fairytale, not
reality, yet the authors of your creation website can't figure that out? The
Bible has absolutely no credibility expect to people with absolute gullibility.
If you think evolution is a farce, your religion is far worse.
Your religion is false and should be abandoned.
The Sage
=============================================================
My Home Page : http://members.cox.net/the.sage
"Toward no crimes have men shown themselves so cold-bloodedly
cruel as in punishing differences in belief"
-- James Russell Lowell
=============================================================
.
User: "Jim Spaza"

Title: Re: Attn: Atheists & Skeptics - What's wrong with answersingenesis.com? 14 Jun 2005 09:17:57 PM
The_Sage wrote:

Reply to article by: "Jim Spaza" <spaza9@yahoo.com>
Date written: 10 Jun 2005 14:20:04 -0700
MsgID:<1118438404.202621.65610@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>


This challenge was issued by GlennGlenn (655321) -- aa#825.


What is wrong with the Christian apologetic website
www.answersingenesis.com ???


Please be courteous and specific.


The biggest flaw of all is that they are blatently and openly biased in their
"research" and conclusions. They choose one particular religion out thousands of
other religions without justifying their choice. If they were going to be
reasonably fair in their judgements, they would judge their own religion by the
same standards they judge evolution. They don't since they aren't interested in
being fair because they are biased in their judgement. But if they did, their
religion would fail miserably, the only difference being that evolution at least
has something physically real to base their explanations with whereas all the
Christians have are their poorly told fairytales. Using their own "logic"
against them from your creation website, if we could find some flaws in the
Christian religion, then that proves the whole religion is false and should be
abandoned, so here goes...

The above would make sense if we could somehow prove beyond any doubt
that this universe is the only one in existence and that there are no
parallel dimensions anywhere at any time.

Where does God or Jesus exist? In some invisible physically unknowable
netherworld. In other words, God doesn't exist in the only reality that we know
for a fact exists outside of our imagination. So don't expect to find any
fossils of God or of Jesus because there won't be any. Imaginary things don't
leave physically real evidence behind.

The short answer is that God exists in a spiritual dimension called
Heaven. Sometimes, God and other spiritual (non-physical) beings come
into this dimension but some power prevents us from normally sensing
them. Of course, I cannot prove any of this. But, this question asked
where Jesus or God exists, thereby allowing me to answer with
theoretical possibilities.

Jesus said he would be in the grave for
more than three days and three nights, yet he was only in the grave for two
days and two nights. That makes Jesus a false prophet.

Your question becomes moot when one considers that "three days and
three nights" could mean 3 whole days or 1 day and 2 partial days in
the Jewish society at that time.
http://ic.net/~erasmus/RAZ488.HTM

The Bible speaks of
things like plants and animals and even stones being able to speak the human
language, or of humans rising from the dead. These kind of things never happen
in real life and cannot happen in real life.

I believe that such things are possible. Would you change your mind if
you saw an animal, plant, or even a stone speak a human language?
Would you change your mind if someone who was dead for three days
suddenly came back to life?
Why do you say such things CANNOT happen, as opposed to such things
have never been validated to have happened?
Do you hold the keys to life and death? Do you understand the 600
volumes of information stored in each of your human cells? Can you
exactly predict how subatomic particles will behave when exposed to
magnetic fields, both of which are invisible and cannot be directly
measured? Do you understand time travel and from where this universe
originated?
If you answered "no" to any of those questions, then isn't it just a
tad presumptious and deity-like of you to declare AS FACT that such
things are absolutely impossible and that the Bible CANNOT be accurate?

It is obviously a fairytale, not
reality, yet the authors of your creation website can't figure that out? The
Bible has absolutely no credibility expect to people with absolute gullibility.
If you think evolution is a farce, your religion is far worse.

Your religion is false and should be abandoned.

So, I should...
1) dismiss all the supernatural events in my life which confirm the
Bible,
2) disregard what my friends and family has testified to me about their
being healed and helped by God,
3) trash all study of the Bible which has, over the years, been
answering more and more questions about the Bible to the point that
there are maybe 10 questions that remain unanswered, and
4) risk my immortal soul,
....all on the slim possibility that you, a limited, fallible human
being, know more about the universe, possible parallel dimensions, and
the afterlife than billions of Christians that have gone before you and
a book that mostly started with 12 men and a Jewish carpenter and ended
up the most popular text of all time.
Thanks, but no thanks pal. If you were to experience what I have, then
you might not be saying such things. Then again...
"And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither
will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead." - Luke 16:31


The Sage

=============================================================
My Home Page : http://members.cox.net/the.sage

"Toward no crimes have men shown themselves so cold-bloodedly
cruel as in punishing differences in belief"
-- James Russell Lowell
=============================================================

.
User: "The_Sage"

Title: Re: Attn: Atheists & Skeptics - What's wrong with answersingenesis.com? 15 Jun 2005 01:33:44 AM

Reply to article by: "Jim Spaza" <spaza9@yahoo.com>
Date written: 14 Jun 2005 14:17:57 -0700
MsgID:<1118783877.257626.209870@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>

This challenge was issued by GlennGlenn (655321) -- aa#825.
What is wrong with the Christian apologetic website
www.answersingenesis.com ???
Please be courteous and specific.

The biggest flaw of all is that they are blatently and openly biased in their
"research" and conclusions. They choose one particular religion out thousands of
other religions without justifying their choice. If they were going to be
reasonably fair in their judgements, they would judge their own religion by the
same standards they judge evolution. They don't since they aren't interested in
being fair because they are biased in their judgement. But if they did, their
religion would fail miserably, the only difference being that evolution at least
has something physically real to base their explanations with whereas all the
Christians have are their poorly told fairytales. Using their own "logic"
against them from your creation website, if we could find some flaws in the
Christian religion, then that proves the whole religion is false and should be
abandoned, so here goes...

The above would make sense if we could somehow prove beyond any doubt
that this universe is the only one in existence and that there are no
parallel dimensions anywhere at any time.

Rather than talk about things we don't know anything at all about, let's just
talk only about things we do know something about. It isn't logical to try and
support the existence of one unknown thing ("spiritual dimensions" or God) with
yet other unknown things (parallel dimensions).
Regardless of how many dimensions may exist (or may not exist), it will not
excuse the openly biased picking of only one religion without using the same
justification that the creation site did in rejecting evolution. Let's see the
justification for picking one religion over all the others and not get
sidetracked with completely irrelevant analogies.

Where does God or Jesus exist? In some invisible physically unknowable
netherworld. In other words, God doesn't exist in the only reality that we know
for a fact exists outside of our imagination. So don't expect to find any
fossils of God or of Jesus because there won't be any. Imaginary things don't
leave physically real evidence behind.

The short answer is that God exists in a spiritual dimension called
Heaven.

The existence of a "spiritual dimension" is not based on any legitimate or valid
logical deduction of known facts, it isn't based on any actual direct or even
indirect evidence, and no one has ever observed it or photographed it or found a
way to demonstrate it outside of their imagination. Evolution has all of the
things that the "spritual dimension" does not (whether incomplete or imperfect
or even flawed), ie -- it has been observed, photographed, and has been
demonstated in various ways, so it isn't based purely on a whim like the
"spritual dimension" is. How so? Evolution has the rock solid evidence of
fossils to base it's story on, and it isn't only fossils, there is DNA and
geology and comparative anatomy, and they all also correspond very well to the
evolution story. Again, what does the "spritual dimension" have for support
other than imagination?

Sometimes, God and other spiritual (non-physical) beings come
into this dimension but some power prevents us from normally sensing
them. Of course, I cannot prove any of this. But, this question asked
where Jesus or God exists, thereby allowing me to answer with
theoretical possibilities.

Let's stick to what we know for a fact, not what we wish were facts. Without
facts or reason, anything is "possible", but reality and logic are about
actualities, not possibilities. Possiblities have to be based on something more
than a whim, things like a logical extension of known facts or indirect
evidence, and as you indirectly admit, you have none. Merely "considering" the
existence of something is a go nowhere argument.
And sticking to the intellectual honesty theme, if you really wanted to consider
possibilities, let's consider all the possibilities such as entertaining the
idea that your version of God is an illusion, delusion, hallucination, or hoax.

Jesus said he would be in the grave for
more than three days and three nights, yet he was only in the grave for two
days and two nights. That makes Jesus a false prophet.

Your question becomes moot when one considers that "three days and
three nights" could mean 3 whole days or 1 day and 2 partial days in
the Jewish society at that time.
http://ic.net/~erasmus/RAZ488.HTM

For one thing, Jesus wouldn't speak Hebrew, he either spoke Aramic or Greek --
the same language the entire New Testament was written in. Hebrew was going
extinct by the time Jesus allegedly existed and Jesus would have spoken the
language of his followers, ie -- not the religious leaders who were the only
ones who spoke Hebrew (to themselves and not the masses).
Even if you consider calling "three days and three nights", "three days", it
still comes up short. Jesus was crucified and died three hours before the Jewish
day ended. There is no idiom in existence that would consider three hours a
whole "day" or especially "a day and a night". The Hebrew idiom is only in
reference to, AT A VERY MINIMUM, only anything over twelve hours. Three hours is
not even close. On Sunday, Jesus was supposedly found missing from his grave
before the Sun rose -- which places his ressurection before 6AM. Again, that is
less than twelve hours so you only had one full day, and little bitty parts of
two other "days". But even if we pretend that the explanation cited above was
based on fact instead of fantasy, it wouldn't negate the blatent fact that Jesus
clearly said he would rise *AFTER* three days and three nights, not before...
"And he began to teach them, that the Son of man must suffer many things, and
be rejected of the elders, and [of] the chief priests, and scribes, and be
killed, and after three days rise again" (Mar 8:31)
By all accounts, Jesus should have risen on Monday morning, not Sunday morning.
So your alternate explanation cite above is now the only thing moot around here.
And there is still more, in case you are wondering. There are two completely
different and contradictory times given for the crucifixion and two completely
different and contradictory times given for the time Jesus was found risen from
his grave. For such an all inclusive important event, one would wonder why they
coudn't get it right.

The Bible speaks of
things like plants and animals and even stones being able to speak the human
language, or of humans rising from the dead. These kind of things never happen
in real life and cannot happen in real life.

I believe that such things are possible. Would you change your mind if
you saw an animal, plant, or even a stone speak a human language?
Would you change your mind if someone who was dead for three days
suddenly came back to life?

I only believe in facts and it is a fact, whether you choose to believe it or
not: plants and animals and stones cannot logical or factually speaking any
human language.

Why do you say such things CANNOT happen,

Can you demonstrate for us how a rock can speak like a human can? Rocks don't
have vocal cords or nervous systems or brains. I don't know why I would have to
tell anyone this, but rocks don't speak and are incapable of speaking. Isn't
that obvious?

as opposed to such things have never been validated to have happened?

Fairytales don't need validation or invalidation because they can't logically
stand on their own to begin with. I can easily tell the difference between a
fairytale and a textbook, and I have been able to do so since I was seven years
old, so I have a hard time relating to people who cannot tell me the difference
between Mother Goose, the Bible, and a Physics textbook. By your own "logic"
above, THE WIZARD OF OZ has never been invalidated therefore it could be a true
life story. Ditto for HARRY POTTER or the Tooth Fairy. But if you can't tell
that these stories are not real life or the difference between these stories and
real life, how can anyone discuss anything with you about reality since you are
unable to comprehend what a fairytale or reality is?

Do you hold the keys to life and death? Do you understand the 600
volumes of information stored in each of your human cells? Can you
exactly predict how subatomic particles will behave when exposed to
magnetic fields, both of which are invisible and cannot be directly
measured? Do you understand time travel and from where this universe
originated?
If you answered "no" to any of those questions, then isn't it just a
tad presumptious and deity-like of you to declare AS FACT that such
things are absolutely impossible and that the Bible CANNOT be accurate?

Using your "logic" above, then it would also be just a tad presumptious and
deity-like of you to declare AS FACT that evolution is absolutely impossible and
that the evolution CANNOT be accurate.
Check mate.

It is obviously a fairytale, not
reality, yet the authors of your creation website can't figure that out? The
Bible has absolutely no credibility expect to people with absolute gullibility.
If you think evolution is a farce, your religion is far worse.
Your religion is false and should be abandoned.

So, I should...

I'm not going tell you what to do and I don't need to hear what alleged
experiences you have deluded yourself with or what support system you have built
you life around to support those delusion. I am only interested in facts and
logic. More specifically, I am interested in not going off on personal topics
when the main topic hasn't even been thoroughly discussed yet. I want to know
how the creation site you cited honestly justified their promotion of one
religion over any other. I want to know why they don't apply the same reason and
logic to their one religion as they did to evolution? You haven't answered those
questions and I'm beginning to wonder if you ever will.

...all on the slim possibility that you, a limited, fallible human
being, know more about the universe, possible parallel dimensions, and
the afterlife than billions of Christians that have gone before you and
a book that mostly started with 12 men and a Jewish carpenter and ended
up the most popular text of all time.

All that it means is that a thousand Frenchmen CAN be wrong and so can a billion
Christians. Billions more people have lived and died for stupider things than
believing a dead man can come back to life.

Thanks, but no thanks pal. If you were to experience what I have, then
you might not be saying such things. Then again...
"And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither
will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead." - Luke 16:31

For God so loved the world, that He will have you exquistely tortured in Hell,
if you don't believe He so loved the world...now have a nice day!
The Sage
=============================================================
My Home Page : http://members.cox.net/the.sage
"Toward no crimes have men shown themselves so cold-bloodedly
cruel as in punishing differences in belief"
-- James Russell Lowell
=============================================================
.

User: "Don Kresch"

Title: Re: Attn: Atheists & Skeptics - What's wrong with answersingenesis.com? 15 Jun 2005 12:55:36 AM
In alt.atheism On 14 Jun 2005 14:17:57 -0700, "Jim Spaza"
<spaza9@yahoo.com> let us all know that:



The_Sage wrote:

Reply to article by: "Jim Spaza" <spaza9@yahoo.com>
Date written: 10 Jun 2005 14:20:04 -0700
MsgID:<1118438404.202621.65610@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>


This challenge was issued by GlennGlenn (655321) -- aa#825.


What is wrong with the Christian apologetic website
www.answersingenesis.com ???


Please be courteous and specific.


The biggest flaw of all is that they are blatently and openly biased in their
"research" and conclusions. They choose one particular religion out thousands of
other religions without justifying their choice. If they were going to be
reasonably fair in their judgements, they would judge their own religion by the
same standards they judge evolution. They don't since they aren't interested in
being fair because they are biased in their judgement. But if they did, their
religion would fail miserably, the only difference being that evolution at least
has something physically real to base their explanations with whereas all the
Christians have are their poorly told fairytales. Using their own "logic"
against them from your creation website, if we could find some flaws in the
Christian religion, then that proves the whole religion is false and should be
abandoned, so here goes...


The above would make sense if we could somehow prove beyond any doubt
that this universe is the only one in existence and that there are no
parallel dimensions anywhere at any time.

Those dimensions are part of the universe.


Where does God or Jesus exist? In some invisible physically unknowable
netherworld. In other words, God doesn't exist in the only reality that we know
for a fact exists outside of our imagination. So don't expect to find any
fossils of God or of Jesus because there won't be any. Imaginary things don't
leave physically real evidence behind.


The short answer is that God exists in a spiritual dimension called
Heaven.

That begs the question of the existence of the "spiritual".

Jesus said he would be in the grave for
more than three days and three nights, yet he was only in the grave for two
days and two nights. That makes Jesus a false prophet.


Your question becomes moot when one considers that "three days and
three nights" could mean 3 whole days or 1 day and 2 partial days in
the Jewish society at that time.

http://ic.net/~erasmus/RAZ488.HTM

No. Day means day.


The Bible speaks of
things like plants and animals and even stones being able to speak the human
language, or of humans rising from the dead. These kind of things never happen
in real life and cannot happen in real life.


I believe that such things are possible.

Then you believe in pixies, elves, and leprechauns.

Why do you say such things CANNOT happen, as opposed to such things
have never been validated to have happened?

Logic.


Do you hold the keys to life and death? Do you understand the 600
volumes of information stored in each of your human cells?

Red herring.

If you answered "no" to any of those questions, then isn't it just a
tad presumptious and deity-like of you to declare AS FACT that such
things are absolutely impossible

No.
Do you declare that square circles cannot exist? Isn't it a
tad presumptuous of you to do so?
Oh wait--they can't exist.
Kills your argument.

It is obviously a fairytale, not
reality, yet the authors of your creation website can't figure that out? The
Bible has absolutely no credibility expect to people with absolute gullibility.
If you think evolution is a farce, your religion is far worse.

Your religion is false and should be abandoned.


So, I should...

1) dismiss all the supernatural events in my life which confirm the
Bible,

None have happened. You just attributed things to the
supernatural, when you have no evidence of it.

2) disregard what my friends and family has testified to me about their
being healed and helped by God,

Never happened. They got better, but no god was involved.

3) trash all study of the Bible which has, over the years, been
answering more and more questions about the Bible to the point that
there are maybe 10 questions that remain unanswered, and

*laughs*

4) risk my immortal soul,

No such thing exists.
And 4 is the most telling. You believe out of 1 reason and 1
reason alone:
FEAR!
That's the worst reason of all to believe.


...all on the slim possibility that you, a limited, fallible human

You're a limited, fallible human.

being, know more about the universe, possible parallel dimensions, and
the afterlife than billions of Christians that have gone before you and
a book that mostly started with 12 men and a Jewish carpenter and ended
up the most popular text of all time.

It's not the most popular. And even if it were--so what?
Don
.
User: "Jim Spaza"

Title: Re: Attn: Atheists & Skeptics - What's wrong with answersingenesis.com? 20 Jun 2005 04:54:27 PM
Don Kresch wrote:

In alt.atheism On 14 Jun 2005 14:17:57 -0700, "Jim Spaza"
<spaza9@yahoo.com> let us all know that:



The_Sage wrote:

Reply to article by: "Jim Spaza" <spaza9@yahoo.com>
Date written: 10 Jun 2005 14:20:04 -0700
MsgID:<1118438404.202621.65610@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>


This challenge was issued by GlennGlenn (655321) -- aa#825.


What is wrong with the Christian apologetic website
www.answersingenesis.com ???


Please be courteous and specific.


The biggest flaw of all is that they are blatently and openly biased in their
"research" and conclusions. They choose one particular religion out thousands of
other religions without justifying their choice. If they were going to be
reasonably fair in their judgements, they would judge their own religion by the
same standards they judge evolution. They don't since they aren't interested in
being fair because they are biased in their judgement. But if they did, their
religion would fail miserably, the only difference being that evolution at least
has something physically real to base their explanations with whereas all the
Christians have are their poorly told fairytales. Using their own "logic"
against them from your creation website, if we could find some flaws in the
Christian religion, then that proves the whole religion is false and should be
abandoned, so here goes...


The above would make sense if we could somehow prove beyond any doubt
that this universe is the only one in existence and that there are no
parallel dimensions anywhere at any time.


Those dimensions are part of the universe.

Why would you say that?



Where does God or Jesus exist? In some invisible physically unknowable
netherworld. In other words, God doesn't exist in the only reality that we know
for a fact exists outside of our imagination. So don't expect to find any
fossils of God or of Jesus because there won't be any. Imaginary things don't
leave physically real evidence behind.


The short answer is that God exists in a spiritual dimension called
Heaven.


That begs the question of the existence of the "spiritual".

Yes.



Jesus said he would be in the grave for
more than three days and three nights, yet he was only in the grave for two
days and two nights. That makes Jesus a false prophet.


Your question becomes moot when one considers that "three days and
three nights" could mean 3 whole days or 1 day and 2 partial days in
the Jewish society at that time.

http://ic.net/~erasmus/RAZ488.HTM


No. Day means day.

To us, yes. Not to the culture of the time.



The Bible speaks of
things like plants and animals and even stones being able to speak the human
language, or of humans rising from the dead. These kind of things never happen
in real life and cannot happen in real life.


I believe that such things are possible.


Then you believe in pixies, elves, and leprechauns.

No. But, such things COULD exist unless proven otherwise. I don't
believe in them; but, I cannot say that they 100% scientifically CANNOT
exist.




Why do you say such things CANNOT happen, as opposed to such things
have never been validated to have happened?


Logic.

Whose logic is accurate, then if others use logic to support their
position that God exists?



Do you hold the keys to life and death? Do you understand the 600
volumes of information stored in each of your human cells?


Red herring.

Not at all. You stated something in the absolute...not 99.999%, but
100% absolute. Wouldn't you agree that to logically state something as
100% accurate one would have to have 100% knowledge of the entity? And
if that entity is a supernatural one asserted to not exist, then would
one have to have at least 100% knowledge of the natural world first?



If you answered "no" to any of those questions, then isn't it just a
tad presumptious and deity-like of you to declare AS FACT that such
things are absolutely impossible


No.

Do you declare that square circles cannot exist? Isn't it a
tad presumptuous of you to do so?

Yes, square circles cannot exist. No, it isn't presumptuous to say as
much. Humans created the word "circle" and "square" and given meaning
to them. Their definition is in contradiction to each other by design.


Oh wait--they can't exist.

Kills your argument.

Are you really comparing one's denial of the existence of a Supreme
Being to one's support of the contradictions inherent within two
opposing geometric definitions?



It is obviously a fairytale, not
reality, yet the authors of your creation website can't figure that out? The
Bible has absolutely no credibility expect to people with absolute gullibility.
If you think evolution is a farce, your religion is far worse.

Your religion is false and should be abandoned.


So, I should...

1) dismiss all the supernatural events in my life which confirm the
Bible,


None have happened. You just attributed things to the
supernatural, when you have no evidence of it.

Again, without your possessing 100% knowledge of my life, experiences,
and the universe, how can you be so sure?



2) disregard what my friends and family has testified to me about their
being healed and helped by God,


Never happened. They got better, but no god was involved.

Only infinite knowledge of the universe can allow for such an absolute
statement. Be honest, please. Wouldn't it be logical to state that it
was PROBABLY a natural event to be healed in such a manner as opposed
to ABSOLUTELY no God was involved?



3) trash all study of the Bible which has, over the years, been
answering more and more questions about the Bible to the point that
there are maybe 10 questions that remain unanswered, and


*laughs*


4) risk my immortal soul,


No such thing exists.

If science cannot handle any supernatural entity or event, then on what
can you base your statement?


And 4 is the most telling. You believe out of 1 reason and 1
reason alone:

FEAR!

That's the worst reason of all to believe.

True, but not about the worst reason statement. Actually, fear of God
is the best reason to believe. I do fear what I believe to be God. If
I am wrong, then I have stupidly lived my life in the reverent fear of
God's judgment of me when I die. But, if the Bible is even somewhat
accurate, then...wouldn't you like to be sure...just in case fallible,
limited science is wrong?




...all on the slim possibility that you, a limited, fallible human


You're a limited, fallible human.

Yes. And I have accepted the fact that 99% of the universe remains
undiscovered and unknown.



being, know more about the universe, possible parallel dimensions, and
the afterlife than billions of Christians that have gone before you and
a book that mostly started with 12 men and a Jewish carpenter and ended
up the most popular text of all time.


It's not the most popular. And even if it were--so what?

Well, don't you think, from a common sense standpoint, that the more
people that read something for themselves and believe it...the higher
the probability that something is true? It's not proof, of course.
Just evidence, right?




Don

.
User: "Deep Thought"

Title: Re: Attn: Atheists & Skeptics - What's wrong with answersingenesis.com? 20 Jun 2005 05:31:55 PM
"Jim Spaza" "

The short answer is that God exists in a spiritual dimension called
Heaven.


That begs the question of the existence of the "spiritual".


Yes.

Begging the question (taking it for granted that some statement is true when
there is no proof it is true) is logical fallacy, knucklehead.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question
.
User: "Jim Spaza"

Title: Re: Attn: Atheists & Skeptics - What's wrong with answersingenesis.com? 23 Jun 2005 03:42:01 PM
Deep Thought wrote:

"Jim Spaza" "

The short answer is that God exists in a spiritual dimension called
Heaven.


That begs the question of the existence of the "spiritual".


Yes.


Begging the question (taking it for granted that some statement is true when
there is no proof it is true) is logical fallacy, knucklehead.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question

Oooh. Name calling, just like in grade school. Perhaps if you were to
consider that others are not as brilliant and logical as you are, then
you might have mercy on those beneath your caliber of intellectual
prowess and maturity. Thanks.
.
User: "Deep Thought"

Title: Re: Attn: Atheists & Skeptics - What's wrong with answersingenesis.com? 23 Jun 2005 06:25:50 PM
"Jim Spaza" <spaza9@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1119541321.533052.26430@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...



Deep Thought wrote:

"Jim Spaza" "

The short answer is that God exists in a spiritual dimension called
Heaven.


That begs the question of the existence of the "spiritual".


Yes.


Begging the question (taking it for granted that some statement is true
when
there is no proof it is true) is logical fallacy, knucklehead.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question


Oooh. Name calling, just like in grade school. Perhaps if you were to
consider that others are not as brilliant and logical as you are, then
you might have mercy on those beneath your caliber of intellectual
prowess and maturity. Thanks.

Begging the question is still logical fallacy, knucklehead. Didn't your
daddy teach you the basics?
You have not established the existence of what you call, "a spiritual
dimension called Heaven" you are begging the question, knucklehead, and
begging the question (taking it for granted that some statement is true when
there is no proof it is true) is still logical fallacy, knucklehead. Start
acting like a grownup who knows the basics and you will be treated like one.
.
User: "Matt Silberstein"

Title: Re: Attn: Atheists & Skeptics - What's wrong with answersingenesis.com? 23 Jun 2005 06:53:48 PM
On Thu, 2