| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Yang, AthD h.c" |
| Date: |
07 Oct 2004 09:15:36 PM |
| Object: |
AWOL Concedes: There is no WMD |
Ooops, our bad, all you mothers and fathers who have lost your
children in Iraq, just pretend nothing happened.
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: -3 million jobs and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1066 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
| User: "Megan Summers" |
|
| Title: FBI needs to investigate CBS, and Dan Rather, for election rigging! |
08 Oct 2004 06:47:19 AM |
|
|
FBI needs to investigate CBS, and Dan Rather, for election rigging!
The House Committee on Energy and Commerce has oversight authority
over the operation of broadcasting, specifically the Subcommittee on
Telecommunications and the Internet, chaired by Fred Upton, Republican
of Michigan, with Ed Markey, Democrat of Massachusetts as ranking
minority member.
Congress has held hearings on Howard Stern and "wardrobe malfunctions"
at the Superbowl. It has held hearings on the networks' disastrous
performance on election night 2000. Now a network is party to a fraud
committed with the obvious intent of influencing an election. Where
are the hearings?
Here's whose on the committee:
http://energycommerce.house.gov/108/members/members.htm
They could investigate Janet Jackson's boob flash, but show no
interest in CBS's forgeries in an attempt to
discredit a sitting president? Let them know how you feel.
----------
Liberals Hate America!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL Concedes: There is no WMD |
08 Oct 2004 12:17:40 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 19:15:36 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
Ooops, our bad, all you mothers and fathers who have lost your
children in Iraq, just pretend nothing happened.
Nope - they can't forget about saddam's finest moment - 911.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hagar" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL Concedes: There is no WMD |
08 Oct 2004 02:20:07 PM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:3sidm0tb5ikg72685cnqohtfhghseh9pb1@4ax.com...
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 19:15:36 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote: > snip the usual crap <
The only thing you Liberal fuckers are expert at is Monday Morning
Quarter-backing. Some of you, especially the two ditzoid Johns, are trying
to make a career out of it, it seems.
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL Concedes: There is no WMD |
08 Oct 2004 03:05:40 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 19:20:07 GMT, "Hagar" <hagen@sahm.name> wrote:
The only thing you Liberal fuckers are expert at is Monday Morning
Quarter-backing. Some of you, especially the two ditzoid Johns, are trying
to make a career out of it, it seems.
W-H-A-T - ME a liberal!!!!!!!!.
4 more years, 4 more years.
But you are right about flipper. He voted for the war before he voted against it.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL Concedes: There is no WMD |
09 Oct 2004 06:19:57 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 15:05:40 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 19:20:07 GMT, "Hagar" <hagen@sahm.name> wrote:
The only thing you Liberal fuckers are expert at is Monday Morning
Quarter-backing. Some of you, especially the two ditzoid Johns, are trying
to make a career out of it, it seems.
W-H-A-T - ME a liberal!!!!!!!!.
:
For once I agree.
You are just way too acephalic to even be in the running to be a
liberal.
Bush is more your mental level.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doorman" |
|
| Title: The vile spewers of mindless blather thread |
09 Oct 2004 07:19:44 AM |
|
|
If you are a fellow American patriot and lover of the First Amendment, then
by these presents greetings. It is good that you seek rational and
democratic discussion of the great and urgent issues facing our nation.
Unfortunately, I think you've come to the wrong place. See the bottom of
this post for additional evidence--but this entire enormous thread is
dedicated to the display of the freshest original parts of such disruptive
anti-democratic tripe. With the witless assistance of the Bushevik trolls,
it only took a short time to build this "tower of babble".
Especially if you remember the old days of rational discussion in the
newsgroups, this triumph of noise over signal may sadden you. Hyde Park of
the world and cheap advertising are all that remain.
However, there are still alternatives. For example, there are many moderated
forums on the Internet where civil discussions and real conversations can be
found. Even better if you can build bridges to real people in the physical
world. For example, you could treat a rational RINO to a movie--like
Fahrenheit 9/11. Lots of good books still being published, or you could
write a letter to the editor for your local paper--you'll reach more real
people and have more impact than here. Or you could donate to the political
campaigns--I confess I've already made six donations. Just remember that big
money is harming democracy, that BushCo has more money than anyone, and that
if money alone decides elections then the American republic is already dead.
Last, but MOST important: VOTE! Your nation needs you NOW!
On the other hand, if you are a Bushevik troll, then in the immortal
floor-of-the-Senate words of the unloved ***** Cheney: "Go ***** yourself."
That mentality goes a long way towards explaining blather like this:
Michael Gray <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote:
<old stuff snip>
For once I agree.
You are just way too acephalic to even be in the running to be a
liberal.
Bush is more your mental level.
[Not sure which side it's on, but it's definitely mindless blather.]
--
We don't know if 9/11 could have been stopped--but we do know Dubya
failed to stop it. That's the FACT.
You want steady leadership for disastrous change?
Attack, lie, spin. Dubya's REAL trifecta.
Trolls fed to "The vile spewers of mindless blather thread".
('Doorman' is a role-based pen name of Shannon Jacobs, copyright
2004.)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL Concedes: There is no WMD |
10 Oct 2004 07:39:35 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 20:49:57 +0930, Michael Gray <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote:
W-H-A-T - ME a liberal!!!!!!!!.
For once I agree.
You are just way too acephalic to even be in the running to be a
liberal.
Bush is more your mental level.
Actually the liberal party is the one with the hands out. The conservative party is the
ones that pay for it.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Galehouse" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL Concedes: There is no WMD |
10 Oct 2004 09:01:43 AM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:labim0h0gjk33j9jfk7ernjaq56ptufopc@4ax.com...
On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 20:49:57 +0930, Michael Gray <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com>
wrote:
W-H-A-T - ME a liberal!!!!!!!!.
For once I agree.
You are just way too acephalic to even be in the running to be a
liberal.
Bush is more your mental level.
Actually the liberal party is the one with the hands out. The
conservative party is the
ones that pay for it.
So, Dookie, you're making the insane assertion that conservatives pay more
taxes than liberals in this country? Back it up with something, you
pathological ***** wad.
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL Concedes: There is no WMD |
10 Oct 2004 03:58:03 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 14:01:43 GMT, "David Galehouse" <AndyG@cinci.rr.com> wrote:
So, Dookie, you're making the insane assertion that conservatives pay more
taxes than liberals in this country? Back it up with something, you
pathological ***** wad.
Because liberals want more for the ones that won't work of it, so they tax those that did
make something of themselves.
Liberals say "gimme something", and Republicans pay for it.
ASharpton is still looking for his 40 acres and a mule. This was a mighty announcement of
his as a prime time speaker at the 'rat convention in Boston this year.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Galehouse" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL Concedes: There is no WMD |
10 Oct 2004 05:43:00 PM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:v78jm0d96v6msckqmb7e7e6k69mj8eh5lt@4ax.com...
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 14:01:43 GMT, "David Galehouse" <AndyG@cinci.rr.com>
wrote:
So, Dookie, you're making the insane assertion that conservatives pay
more
taxes than liberals in this country? Back it up with something, you
pathological ***** wad.
Because liberals want more for the ones that won't work of it, so they tax
those that did
make something of themselves.
Liberals say "gimme something", and Republicans pay for it.
Again, you're making a purely emotional argument. What *facts* are you
basing your ridiculous assertion on?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vash The Stampede" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL Concedes: There is no WMD |
10 Oct 2004 11:21:20 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 22:43:00 +0000, David Galehouse wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:v78jm0d96v6msckqmb7e7e6k69mj8eh5lt@4ax.com...
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 14:01:43 GMT, "David Galehouse" <AndyG@cinci.rr.com>
wrote:
So, Dookie, you're making the insane assertion that conservatives pay
more
taxes than liberals in this country? Back it up with something, you
pathological ***** wad.
Because liberals want more for the ones that won't work of it, so they tax
those that did
make something of themselves.
Liberals say "gimme something", and Republicans pay for it.
Again, you're making a purely emotional argument. What *facts* are you
basing your ridiculous assertion on?
Why are you asking *him* for facts, when Jacobs can post:
Actually, we don't know about the memos. The facts that are known are:
You said "Duh. They have already traced them back to a close personal
friend of Karl Rove" You said it on September 25th this year. Forgot
already? Liars sometimes *DO* forget their lies, but since I have been
rubbing your nose in it for 3 weeks now, I figured you'd remember that!
But, true lairs often *do* forget their lies.
And no one says a word? Guess which side of the fence it is, eh?
LIBERALS! Looks like we'll have to BLAST our way out!
--
Besides, what would they say if I told them
I was hanging out with Vash The Stampede?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doorman" |
|
| Title: The vile spewers of mindless blather thread |
11 Oct 2004 05:51:40 AM |
|
|
If you are a fellow American patriot and lover of the First Amendment, then
by these presents greetings. It is good that you seek rational and
democratic discussion of the great and urgent issues facing our nation.
Unfortunately, I think you've come to the wrong place. See the bottom of
this post for additional evidence--but this entire enormous thread is
dedicated to the display of the freshest original parts of such disruptive
anti-democratic tripe. With the witless assistance of the Bushevik trolls,
it only took a short time to build this "tower of babble".
Especially if you remember the old days of rational discussion in the
newsgroups, this triumph of noise over signal may sadden you. Hyde Park of
the world and cheap advertising are all that remain.
However, there are still alternatives. For example, there are many moderated
forums on the Internet where civil discussions and real conversations can be
found. Even better if you can build bridges to real people in the physical
world. For example, you could treat a rational RINO to a movie--like
Fahrenheit 9/11. Lots of good books still being published, or you could
write a letter to the editor for your local paper--you'll reach more real
people and have more impact than here. Or you could donate to the political
campaigns--I confess I've already made six donations. Just remember that big
money is harming democracy, that BushCo has more money than anyone, and that
if money alone decides elections then the American republic is already dead.
Last, but MOST important: VOTE! Your nation needs you NOW!
On the other hand, if you are a Bushevik troll, then in the immortal
floor-of-the-Senate words of the unloved ***** Cheney: "Go ***** yourself."
That mentality goes a long way towards explaining blather like this:
Vash The Stampede <trigun@2am.cn> wrote:
<old stuff snip>
Why are you asking *him* for facts, when Jacobs can post:
Actually, we don't know about the memos. The facts that are known
are:
You said "Duh. They have already traced them back to a close
personal friend of Karl Rove" You said it on September 25th this
year. Forgot already? Liars sometimes *DO* forget their lies, but
since I have been rubbing your nose in it for 3 weeks now, I
figured you'd remember that! But, true lairs often *do* forget
their lies.
And no one says a word? Guess which side of the fence it is, eh?
LIBERALS! Looks like we'll have to BLAST our way out!
--
We don't know if 9/11 could have been stopped--but we do know Dubya
failed to stop it. That's the FACT.
You want steady leadership for disastrous change?
Attack, lie, spin. Dubya's REAL trifecta.
Trolls fed to "The vile spewers of mindless blather thread".
('Doorman' is a role-based pen name of Shannon Jacobs, copyright
2004.)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Doorman" |
|
| Title: The vile spewers of mindless blather thread |
10 Oct 2004 04:33:44 PM |
|
|
If you are a fellow American patriot and lover of the First Amendment, then
by these presents greetings. It is good that you seek rational and
democratic discussion of the great and urgent issues facing our nation.
Unfortunately, I think you've come to the wrong place. See the bottom of
this post for additional evidence--but this entire enormous thread is
dedicated to the display of the freshest original parts of such disruptive
anti-democratic tripe. With the witless assistance of the Bushevik trolls,
it only took a short time to build this "tower of babble".
Especially if you remember the old days of rational discussion in the
newsgroups, this triumph of noise over signal may sadden you. Hyde Park of
the world and cheap advertising are all that remain.
However, there are still alternatives. For example, there are many moderated
forums on the Internet where civil discussions and real conversations can be
found. Even better if you can build bridges to real people in the physical
world. For example, you could treat a rational RINO to a movie--like
Fahrenheit 9/11. Lots of good books still being published, or you could
write a letter to the editor for your local paper--you'll reach more real
people and have more impact than here. Or you could donate to the political
campaigns--I confess I've already made six donations. Just remember that big
money is harming democracy, that BushCo has more money than anyone, and that
if money alone decides elections then the American republic is already dead.
Last, but MOST important: VOTE! Your nation needs you NOW!
On the other hand, if you are a Bushevik troll, then in the immortal
floor-of-the-Senate words of the unloved ***** Cheney: "Go ***** yourself."
That mentality goes a long way towards explaining blather like this:
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
<old stuff snip>
Because liberals want more for the ones that won't work of it, so
they tax those that did make something of themselves.
Liberals say "gimme something", and Republicans pay for it.
ASharpton is still looking for his 40 acres and a mule. This was a
mighty announcement of his as a prime time speaker at the 'rat
convention in Boston this year.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
[This reconstructionist troll has only a very small litany of the same old
BushCo lies.]
--
We don't know if 9/11 could have been stopped--but we do know Dubya
failed to stop it. That's the FACT.
You want steady leadership for disastrous change?
Attack, lie, spin. Dubya's REAL trifecta.
Trolls fed to "The vile spewers of mindless blather thread".
('Doorman' is a role-based pen name of Shannon Jacobs, copyright
2004.)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Doorman" |
|
| Title: The vile spewers of mindless blather thread |
10 Oct 2004 07:54:06 AM |
|
|
If you are a fellow American patriot and lover of the First Amendment, then
by these presents greetings. It is good that you seek rational and
democratic discussion of the great and urgent issues facing our nation.
Unfortunately, I think you've come to the wrong place. See the bottom of
this post for additional evidence--but this entire enormous thread is
dedicated to the display of the freshest original parts of such disruptive
anti-democratic tripe. With the witless assistance of the Bushevik trolls,
it only took a short time to build this "tower of babble".
Especially if you remember the old days of rational discussion in the
newsgroups, this triumph of noise over signal may sadden you. Hyde Park of
the world and cheap advertising are all that remain.
However, there are still alternatives. For example, there are many moderated
forums on the Internet where civil discussions and real conversations can be
found. Even better if you can build bridges to real people in the physical
world. For example, you could treat a rational RINO to a movie--like
Fahrenheit 9/11. Lots of good books still being published, or you could
write a letter to the editor for your local paper--you'll reach more real
people and have more impact than here. Or you could donate to the political
campaigns--I confess I've already made six donations. Just remember that big
money is harming democracy, that BushCo has more money than anyone, and that
if money alone decides elections then the American republic is already dead.
Last, but MOST important: VOTE! Your nation needs you NOW!
On the other hand, if you are a Bushevik troll, then in the immortal
floor-of-the-Senate words of the unloved ***** Cheney: "Go ***** yourself."
That mentality goes a long way towards explaining blather like this:
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
<snip>
Actually the liberal party is the one with the hands out. The
conservative party is the ones that pay for it.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
[Just keeps spinning the same old lies...]
--
We don't know if 9/11 could have been stopped--but we do know Dubya
failed to stop it. That's the FACT.
You want steady leadership for disastrous change?
Attack, lie, spin. Dubya's REAL trifecta.
Trolls fed to "The vile spewers of mindless blather thread".
('Doorman' is a role-based pen name of Shannon Jacobs, copyright
2004.)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Clave" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL Concedes: There is no WMD |
08 Oct 2004 01:11:40 PM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:3sidm0tb5ikg72685cnqohtfhghseh9pb1@4ax.com...
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 19:15:36 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
Ooops, our bad, all you mothers and fathers who have lost your
children in Iraq, just pretend nothing happened.
Nope - they can't forget about saddam's finest moment - 911.
And you even *know* he had nothing to do with it.
You are one stupid *****.
Jim
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL Concedes: There is no WMD |
08 Oct 2004 03:56:57 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 11:11:40 -0700, "Clave"
<ClaviusNoSpamDammit@CableSpeed.com> wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:3sidm0tb5ikg72685cnqohtfhghseh9pb1@4ax.com...
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 19:15:36 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
Ooops, our bad, all you mothers and fathers who have lost your
children in Iraq, just pretend nothing happened.
Nope - they can't forget about saddam's finest moment - 911.
And you even *know* he had nothing to do with it.
You are one stupid *****.
Or just plain deceitful. I really find it hard to believe there's
anyone quite that stupid .
_______
Vote Bush/Voldemort 2004!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Clave" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL Concedes: There is no WMD |
08 Oct 2004 04:14:10 PM |
|
|
<retrogrouch@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1ovdm01tuk5g434556g9afs6oanjljt1dn@4ax.com...
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 11:11:40 -0700, "Clave"
<ClaviusNoSpamDammit@CableSpeed.com> wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:3sidm0tb5ikg72685cnqohtfhghseh9pb1@4ax.com...
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 19:15:36 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
Ooops, our bad, all you mothers and fathers who have lost your
children in Iraq, just pretend nothing happened.
Nope - they can't forget about saddam's finest moment - 911.
And you even *know* he had nothing to do with it.
You are one stupid *****.
Or just plain deceitful. I really find it hard to believe there's
anyone quite that stupid .
Don't get me wrong -- I meant both.
Pathetically dishonest for putting out what he knows to be a lie, but one stupid
***** for thinking anyone else is stupid enough to believe it.
Jim
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL Concedes: There is no WMD |
08 Oct 2004 03:04:11 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 11:11:40 -0700, "Clave" <ClaviusNoSpamDammit@CableSpeed.com> wrote:
Nope - they can't forget about saddam's finest moment - 911.
And you even *know* he had nothing to do with it.
Correction - nothing collaborative according to the 911 commission.
You are one stupid *****.
Jim
flipper's buddy saddam cried with joy on 911.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Galehouse" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL Concedes: There is no WMD |
08 Oct 2004 03:37:56 PM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:6jsdm09fhff12skl4p7jjdc4ok04qrbefc@4ax.com...
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 11:11:40 -0700, "Clave"
<ClaviusNoSpamDammit@CableSpeed.com> wrote:
Nope - they can't forget about saddam's finest moment - 911.
And you even *know* he had nothing to do with it.
Correction - nothing collaborative according to the 911 commission.
You are one stupid *****.
Jim
flipper's buddy saddam cried with joy on 911.
Hey, Dookie. If Saddam was Clinton's buddy, then why was Cheney's company
selling him technology during the 90's?
UNITED NATIONS, June 23 (UPI) -- Halliburton Co., the oil company that was
headed by Vice President ***** Cheney, signed contracts with Iraq worth $73
million through two subsidiaries while he was at its helm, the Washington
Post reported.
During last year's presidential campaign, Cheney said Halliburton did
business with Libya and Iran through foreign subsidiaries, but maintained he
had imposed a "firm policy" against trading with Iraq.
"Iraq's different," the Post quoted him as saying.
Oil industry executives and confidential U.N. records showed, however, that
Halliburton held stakes in two companies that signed contracts to sell more
than $73 million in oil production equipment and spare parts to Iraq while
Cheney was chairman and chief executive officer, the Post reported.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "W. Syme" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL Concedes: There is no WMD |
08 Oct 2004 02:59:14 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 15:04:11 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 11:11:40 -0700, "Clave" <ClaviusNoSpamDammit@CableSpeed.com> wrote:
Nope - they can't forget about saddam's finest moment - 911.
And you even *know* he had nothing to do with it.
Correction - nothing collaborative according to the 911 commission.
You are one stupid *****.
Jim
flipper's buddy saddam cried with joy on 911.
Duke, you are surely an idiot.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Mitchum" |
|
| Title: "Collaborative" Connection |
08 Oct 2004 06:22:59 PM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 11:11:40 -0700, "Clave"
<ClaviusNoSpamDammit@CableSpeed.com> wrote:
Nope - they can't forget about saddam's finest moment - 911.
And you even *know* he had nothing to do with it.
Correction - nothing collaborative according to the 911 commission.
What's the distinction? If Hussein didn't collaborate on 9/11, then what
was his role in it?
--
The White House has insisted Saddam was a threat to the United States
and had weapons of mass destruction (WMD) capability, but Kay told NBC
television: "All I can say is 'denial' is not just a river in Egypt."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steve Knight" |
|
| Title: Re: "Collaborative" Connection |
08 Oct 2004 09:51:10 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:22:59 -0700, usenet@mile23.c0m (Paul Mitchum)
wrote:
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 11:11:40 -0700, "Clave"
<ClaviusNoSpamDammit@CableSpeed.com> wrote:
Nope - they can't forget about saddam's finest moment - 911.
And you even *know* he had nothing to do with it.
Correction - nothing collaborative according to the 911 commission.
What's the distinction? If Hussein didn't collaborate on 9/11, then what
was his role in it?
He was framed on a guess. I don't like the ***** any more than
anyone else, but there is no evidence he had anything to do with 9/11
OR had weapons of mass destruction. There was no national security
interest in starting a war. The Chimp blundered....again. And he's
getting our soldiers killed while he sits warm and fuzzy like in the
sixties.
Warlord Steve
BAAWA
www.sonic.net/~wooly
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: "Collaborative" Connection |
09 Oct 2004 06:52:48 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 02:51:10 GMT, Steve Knight <whooly@sonic.net> wrote:
What's the distinction? If Hussein didn't collaborate on 9/11, then what
was his role in it?
He was framed on a guess. I don't like the ***** any more than
anyone else, but there is no evidence he had anything to do with 9/11
correction - evidence of "collaboration in 911".
OR had weapons of mass destruction.
Monday morning quarterback - took 2 years after 911 to finally "maybe" arrive at that
idea.
Thank you President George Bush.
There was no national security
interest in starting a war. The Chimp blundered....again.
I voted for the war before I voted against it - according to flipper.
And he's
getting our soldiers killed while he sits warm and fuzzy like in the
sixties.
Or as flipper did when he gave aid and comfort to North Vietnam. Remember, he lovingly
handed to the NV what others underwent torture when they refused to do the same.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: "Collaborative" Connection |
09 Oct 2004 06:47:49 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:22:59 -0700, usenet@mile23.c0m (Paul Mitchum) wrote:
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 11:11:40 -0700, "Clave"
<ClaviusNoSpamDammit@CableSpeed.com> wrote:
Nope - they can't forget about saddam's finest moment - 911.
And you even *know* he had nothing to do with it.
Correction - nothing collaborative according to the 911 commission.
What's the distinction? If Hussein didn't collaborate on 9/11, then what
was his role in it?
He wasn't seen donating planes or pilots to 911. Or as the 911 commission said "no
evidence of ......" Training for, assistance with from Iraq, land use for, etc - maybe
so. Possibly you should ask the 911 commission what the cutoff is.
Main Entry:col£lab£o£rate
Pronunciation:k*-*la-b*-*r*t
Function:intransitive verb
Inflected Form:-rat£ed ; -rat£ing
Etymology:Late Latin collaboratus, past participle of collaborare to labor together, from
Latin com- + laborare to labor — more at LABOR
Date:1871
1 : to work jointly with others or together especially in an intellectual endeavor
2 : to cooperate with or willingly assist an enemy of one's country and especially an
occupying force
3 : to cooperate with an agency or instrumentality with which one is not immediately
connected
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Mitchum" |
|
| Title: Re: "Collaborative" Connection |
09 Oct 2004 06:52:37 AM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:22:59 -0700, usenet@mile23.c0m (Paul Mitchum) wrote:
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 11:11:40 -0700, "Clave"
<ClaviusNoSpamDammit@CableSpeed.com> wrote:
Nope - they can't forget about saddam's finest moment - 911.
And you even *know* he had nothing to do with it.
Correction - nothing collaborative according to the 911 commission.
What's the distinction? If Hussein didn't collaborate on 9/11, then what
was his role in it?
He wasn't seen donating planes or pilots to 911. Or as the 911 commission
said "no evidence of ......" Training for, assistance with from Iraq,
land use for, etc - maybe so. Possibly you should ask the 911 commission
what the cutoff is.
So basically, you don't know what the distinction is.
--
"I hear the rumors on the internets." -- George W. Bush
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: "Collaborative" Connection |
10 Oct 2004 07:37:31 AM |
|
|
Correction - nothing collaborative according to the 911 commission.
What's the distinction? If Hussein didn't collaborate on 9/11, then what
was his role in it?
He wasn't seen donating planes or pilots to 911. Or as the 911 commission
said "no evidence of ......" Training for, assistance with from Iraq,
land use for, etc - maybe so. Possibly you should ask the 911 commission
what the cutoff is.
So basically, you don't know what the distinction is.
The way I see it, the 911 commission and I see exactly the same thing. What's your
problem - comprehension?
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Mitchum" |
|
| Title: Re: "Collaborative" Connection |
10 Oct 2004 06:38:58 PM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
Correction - nothing collaborative according to the 911 commission.
What's the distinction? If Hussein didn't collaborate on 9/11, then
what was his role in it?
He wasn't seen donating planes or pilots to 911. Or as the 911
commission said "no evidence of ......" Training for, assistance with
from Iraq, land use for, etc - maybe so. Possibly you should ask the
911 commission what the cutoff is.
So basically, you don't know what the distinction is.
The way I see it, the 911 commission and I see exactly the same thing.
What's your problem - comprehension?
You keep correcting people over the word 'collaborative.' I keep asking
you what the distinction is, and why that word is important. You keep
wimping out and not answering.
--
"I hear the rumors on the internets." -- George W. Bush
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: "Collaborative" Connection |
11 Oct 2004 05:56:20 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 16:38:58 -0700, usenet@mile23.c0m (Paul Mitchum) wrote:
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
Correction - nothing collaborative according to the 911 commission.
What's the distinction? If Hussein didn't collaborate on 9/11, then
what was his role in it?
He wasn't seen donating planes or pilots to 911. Or as the 911
commission said "no evidence of ......" Training for, assistance with
from Iraq, land use for, etc - maybe so. Possibly you should ask the
911 commission what the cutoff is.
So basically, you don't know what the distinction is.
The way I see it, the 911 commission and I see exactly the same thing.
What's your problem - comprehension?
You keep correcting people over the word 'collaborative.' I keep asking
you what the distinction is, and why that word is important. You keep
wimping out and not answering.
Try the dictionary. I did, and I posted it. The word is important because the 911
commission make a special point of acknowledging "no evidence of collaborative support"
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Wilcox" |
|
| Title: Re: "Collaborative" Connection |
08 Oct 2004 06:39:49 PM |
|
|
Paul Mitchum wrote:
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 11:11:40 -0700, "Clave"
<ClaviusNoSpamDammit@CableSpeed.com> wrote:
Nope - they can't forget about saddam's finest moment - 911.
And you even *know* he had nothing to do with it.
Correction - nothing collaborative according to the 911 commission.
What's the distinction? If Hussein didn't collaborate on 9/11, then what
was his role in it?
He saw it happen on TV, slapped his thighs and yelled " Far Out"? Truth
be told they wanted him gone and it didn't matter how.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL Concedes: There is no WMD |
09 Oct 2004 06:17:21 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 12:17:40 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 19:15:36 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
Ooops, our bad, all you mothers and fathers who have lost your
children in Iraq, just pretend nothing happened.
Nope - they can't forget about saddam's finest moment - 911.
:
There, there. You just calm down now dukey-boy.
Go back in the corner with the other patients and do some more
coloring-in, eh?
Oh dear, look: you're dribbling again. My, my.
At least you haven't wet yourself today!
In a teensy-while, if you are a *very* good boy, Matron will give some
of those bright red pills that make you feel good...
Won't that be nice?
You know the ones.
Yes! The ones with the white stripe.
My how you are learning!
Soon you'll be dressing yourself!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
