| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
| Date: |
02 Aug 2005 02:49:09 AM |
| Object: |
AWOL's Disapproval Rating Hits 50% for the First Time |
CHIMPEACH!
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-07-29-gallup-poll_x.htm
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1798 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
| User: "zztop8970" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL's Disapproval Rating Hits 50% for the First Time |
02 Aug 2005 08:20:58 PM |
|
|
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:e29ue1hihbuek385rsf0k9juqe64931jac@4ax.com...
CHIMPEACH!
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-07-29-gallup-poll_x.htm
Looks like he's still 4 points better than Clinton's high water mark for
disapproval. Were you calling for Clinton's impeachment back then?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL's Disapproval Rating Hits 50% for the First Time |
03 Aug 2005 10:57:04 PM |
|
|
"zztop8970" <none@tospeakof.com> wrote in message
news:_ZUHe.9352$_%4.2365@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:e29ue1hihbuek385rsf0k9juqe64931jac@4ax.com...
CHIMPEACH!
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-07-29-gallup-poll_x.htm
Looks like he's still 4 points better than Clinton's high water mark for
disapproval. Were you calling for Clinton's impeachment back then?
Would you call someone who lied about a little White House
nookie with a willing partner comparable to someone who lied
to get our and other countries into a totally unnecessary war
which has led to the deaths of over 1800 of our soldiers? If
you say yes, you are less than human.
Clinton had some sex. Bush committed treason. There is
no comparison.
--
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
Michelle Malkin (Mickey) aa list#1
alt.atheism atheist/agnostic list name collector
BAAWA Knight & EAC Bible thumper thumper
http://questioner.www2.50megs.com
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mickey" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL's Disapproval Rating Hits 50% for the First Time |
03 Aug 2005 11:34:12 PM |
|
|
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:EOudnWTh0IOPD2zfRVn-qA@comcast.com...
"zztop8970" <none@tospeakof.com> wrote in message
news:_ZUHe.9352$_%4.2365@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:e29ue1hihbuek385rsf0k9juqe64931jac@4ax.com...
CHIMPEACH!
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-07-29-gallup-poll_x.htm
Looks like he's still 4 points better than Clinton's high water mark for
disapproval. Were you calling for Clinton's impeachment back then?
Would you call someone who lied about a little White House
nookie with a willing partner comparable to someone who lied
to get our and other countries into a totally unnecessary war
which has led to the deaths of over 1800 of our soldiers? If
you say yes, you are less than human.
Clinton had some sex. Bush committed treason. There is
no comparison.
Huh? Removing a man responsible for the deaths of MILLIONS is totally
unnecessary? Gee, what a nice high value you place on human life.
Sometimes I sit here and spend HOURS trying to figure out who are bigger
idiots, the right wing goose-steppers, or the left wing ostriches.
And then people wonder why so few people exercise the right to vote?
One day (but not a day in our immediate future), we will come to a point
where a democrat will actually be able to utter something positive about a
republican, and a republican will be able to say a nice thing about a
democrat. Right now, this nation has adopted the mentality that every
politician is either 100% evil, or 100% perfect, when the simplest form of
logic tells you that NEITHER can be CLOSE to being true. You are one of
those. I think if Bush, while sitting on the toilet, discovered a cure for
ALL human diseases, you'd find a way to put a bad spin on it.
So tell me, how does this mindset differ significantly from that of say.....
Kenneth Starr? You are as hungry to hang Bush to promote your agenda as that
***** was to hang Clinton to promote his.
A little Jewish advice for you: The only place to see ALL of the road is
while standing on the line in the middle.
Mickey
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jack" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL's Disapproval Rating Hits 50% for the First Time |
09 Aug 2005 02:48:54 PM |
|
|
"Mickey" <mickeySPAMb@SPAMcomcastSPAM.net> wrote in message
news:6-2dnRJmUK5FB2zfRVn-uw@comcast.com...
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:EOudnWTh0IOPD2zfRVn-qA@comcast.com...
Clinton had some sex. Bush committed treason. There is
no comparison.
Huh? Removing a man responsible for the deaths of MILLIONS is totally
unnecessary? Gee, what a nice high value you place on human life.
Explain your millions here and how Bush's number are better:
Explain why trying to impeach Clinton for oral sex makes is defendable
whereas lying, and killing thousands for oil is not an impeachable offense:
Oups you can't right ? You're retarded.
Sometimes I sit here and spend HOURS trying to figure out who are bigger
idiots, the right wing goose-steppers, or the left wing ostriches.
You need a hobby.
And then people wonder why so few people exercise the right to vote?
Here's an explanation, they're lazy and stupid like you.
One day (but not a day in our immediate future), we will come to a point
where a democrat will actually be able to utter something positive about a
republican, and a republican will be able to say a nice thing about a
democrat.
And that will be helpfull how ?
Right now, this nation has adopted the mentality that every
politician is either 100% evil, or 100% perfect, when the simplest form of
logic tells you that NEITHER can be CLOSE to being true.
You are a 100% perfect idiot. Every rule needs an exception.
You are one of
those. I think if Bush, while sitting on the toilet, discovered a cure for
ALL human diseases,
I don't really believe this can be called "thinking".
you'd find a way to put a bad spin on it.
Considering his stand on medical research and the level of stupidity this as
exactly 0% chance of happening.
So tell me, how does this mindset differ significantly from that of
say.....
Kenneth Starr?
You are as hungry to hang Bush to promote your agenda as that
Sure but when the agenda is that killing innocent civilians is wrong, I tend
to think it makes a little difference.
***** was to hang Clinton to promote his.
A little Jewish advice for you: The only place to see ALL of the road is
while standing on the line in the middle.
Actually no you would see it much better from above.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rostyslaw J. Lewyckyj" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL's Disapproval Rating Hits 50% for the First Time |
09 Aug 2005 05:17:49 PM |
|
|
Jack wrote:
Explain your millions here and how Bush's number are better:
Explain why trying to impeach Clinton for oral sex makes is defendable
whereas lying, and killing thousands for oil is not an impeachable offense:
Oups you can't right ? You're retarded.
But getting a ***** from MS. Monica was not the charge
for which Clinton was impeached. :-p !
Anyway, she was not someones wife, so he did not
commit adultery. Under Jewish law no problemo.
As to Bush's ordering the killing of thousands for oil,
where is that stated to be an impeachable offence?
.
|
|
|
| User: "SCR Insurgency" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL's Disapproval Rating Hits 50% for the First Time |
09 Aug 2005 08:01:21 PM |
|
|
"Rostyslaw J. Lewyckyj" <urjlew@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:aT9Ke.5518$3p.2580@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
: Jack wrote:
: >
: > Explain your millions here and how Bush's number are better:
: > Explain why trying to impeach Clinton for oral sex makes is defendable
: > whereas lying, and killing thousands for oil is not an impeachable
offense:
: >
: > Oups you can't right ? You're retarded.
: >
: But getting a ***** from MS. Monica was not the charge
: for which Clinton was impeached. :-p !
: Anyway, she was not someones wife, so he did not
: commit adultery. Under Jewish law no problemo.
: As to Bush's ordering the killing of thousands for oil,
: where is that stated to be an impeachable offence?
:
Relax kids. Three more years and Bush is done. This is not Belarus or North
Korea or Venezuaela, ya know.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rostyslaw J. Lewyckyj" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL's Disapproval Rating Hits 50% for the First Time |
10 Aug 2005 05:00:08 PM |
|
|
SCR Insurgency wrote:
"Rostyslaw J. Lewyckyj" <urjlew@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:aT9Ke.5518$3p.2580@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
: Jack wrote:
: >
: > Explain your millions here and how Bush's number are better:
: > Explain why trying to impeach Clinton for oral sex makes is defendable
: > whereas lying, and killing thousands for oil is not an impeachable
offense:
: >
: > Oups you can't right ? You're retarded.
: >
: But getting a ***** from MS. Monica was not the charge
: for which Clinton was impeached. :-p !
: Anyway, she was not someones wife, so he did not
: commit adultery. Under Jewish law no problemo.
: As to Bush's ordering the killing of thousands for oil,
: where is that stated to be an impeachable offence?
:
Relax kids. Three more years and Bush is done. This is not Belarus or North
Korea or Venezuaela, ya know.
Three years. :-(
But, Oh well, Hope springs eternal
His mind could turn to jelly and they'd put him in a padded room.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Susan Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL's Disapproval Rating Hits 50% for the First Time |
10 Aug 2005 05:07:37 PM |
|
|
"Rostyslaw J. Lewyckyj" <urjlew@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:xIuKe.503$xW.118@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
SCR Insurgency wrote:
Relax kids. Three more years and Bush is done. This is not Belarus or
North Korea or Venezuaela, ya know.
Three years. :-(
But, Oh well, Hope springs eternal
His mind could turn to jelly and they'd put him in a padded room.
They're taking these 3 years to shove Jeb down our throats.
Susan
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim F." |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL's Disapproval Rating Hits 50% for the First Time |
10 Aug 2005 06:04:23 PM |
|
|
"Susan Cohen" <flaviaR@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:JUuKe.4874$0d.1101@trnddc06...
"Rostyslaw J. Lewyckyj" <urjlew@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:xIuKe.503$xW.118@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
SCR Insurgency wrote:
Relax kids. Three more years and Bush is done. This is not Belarus or
North Korea or Venezuaela, ya know.
Three years. :-(
But, Oh well, Hope springs eternal
His mind could turn to jelly and they'd put him in a padded room.
They're taking these 3 years to shove Jeb down our throats.
Of course the Republicans could instead nominate the governor
of my state, Mitt Romney, who in terms of flip-flopping on social
issues like abortion or gay rights, makes the last Massachusetts
presidential candidate, John Kerry, look like a rank amateur.
In the mean time, we, in Massachusetts, have to suffer with
a governor, who has basically lost all interest in his present job,
and now takes positions only on issues that are calculated to boost
his presidential bid. No one here, expects him to run for reelection
as governor, next year, so he has lost whatever clout he had on
Beacon Hill. Meanwhile, things like public transportation and
other public services continue to deterioate. There is basically
no one home right now in the governor's office at the State House.
Susan
.
|
|
|
| User: "Susan Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL's Disapproval Rating Hits 50% for the First Time |
10 Aug 2005 06:34:26 PM |
|
|
"Jim F." <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:3lvfhcF14jmggU1@individual.net...
"Susan Cohen" <flaviaR@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:JUuKe.4874$0d.1101@trnddc06...
"Rostyslaw J. Lewyckyj" <urjlew@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:xIuKe.503$xW.118@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
SCR Insurgency wrote:
Relax kids. Three more years and Bush is done. This is not Belarus or
North Korea or Venezuaela, ya know.
Three years. :-(
But, Oh well, Hope springs eternal
His mind could turn to jelly and they'd put him in a padded room.
They're taking these 3 years to shove Jeb down our throats.
Of course the Republicans could instead nominate the governor
of my state, Mitt Romney, who in terms of flip-flopping on social
issues like abortion or gay rights, makes the last Massachusetts
presidential candidate, John Kerry, look like a rank amateur.
Of course, since he didn't really flip-flop as he wa portrayed doing.
In the mean time, we, in Massachusetts, have to suffer with
a governor, who has basically lost all interest in his present job,
and now takes positions only on issues that are calculated to boost
his presidential bid. No one here, expects him to run for reelection
as governor, next year, so he has lost whatever clout he had on
Beacon Hill. Meanwhile, things like public transportation and
other public services continue to deterioate. There is basically
no one home right now in the governor's office at the State House.
YEAH! He sounds like a GREAT Republican candidate!
Susan
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Captain!" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL's Disapproval Rating Hits 50% for the First Time |
11 Aug 2005 12:45:37 AM |
|
|
"Jim F." <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:3lvfhcF14jmggU1@individual.net...
"Susan Cohen" <flaviaR@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:JUuKe.4874$0d.1101@trnddc06...
"Rostyslaw J. Lewyckyj" <urjlew@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:xIuKe.503$xW.118@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
SCR Insurgency wrote:
Relax kids. Three more years and Bush is done. This is not Belarus or
North Korea or Venezuaela, ya know.
Three years. :-(
But, Oh well, Hope springs eternal
His mind could turn to jelly and they'd put him in a padded room.
They're taking these 3 years to shove Jeb down our throats.
Of course the Republicans could instead nominate the governor
of my state, Mitt Romney, who in terms of flip-flopping on social
issues like abortion or gay rights, makes the last Massachusetts
presidential candidate, John Kerry, look like a rank amateur.
In the mean time, we, in Massachusetts, have to suffer with
a governor, who has basically lost all interest in his present job,
and now takes positions only on issues that are calculated to boost
his presidential bid. No one here, expects him to run for reelection
as governor, next year, so he has lost whatever clout he had on
Beacon Hill. Meanwhile, things like public transportation and
other public services continue to deterioate. There is basically
no one home right now in the governor's office at the State House.
sux to be you.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "lightspeed" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL's Disapproval Rating Hits 50% for the First Time |
11 Aug 2005 01:54:17 PM |
|
|
Rostyslaw J. Lewyckyj wrote:
As to Bush's ordering the killing of thousands for oil,
where is that stated to be an impeachable offence?
Indeed, mass killing for resources is the prime value of Western
civilization. He is simply fulfilling the principles of the American way.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rico X. Partay" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL's Disapproval Rating Hits 50% for the First Time |
12 Aug 2005 10:09:54 AM |
|
|
Rostyslaw J. Lewyckyj wrote:
As to Bush's ordering the killing of thousands for oil,
where is that stated to be an impeachable offence?
That's covered by "high crimes & misdemeanors."
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "zztop8970" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL's Disapproval Rating Hits 50% for the First Time |
04 Aug 2005 09:50:48 AM |
|
|
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:EOudnWTh0IOPD2zfRVn-qA@comcast.com...
"zztop8970" <none@tospeakof.com> wrote in message
news:_ZUHe.9352$_%4.2365@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:e29ue1hihbuek385rsf0k9juqe64931jac@4ax.com...
CHIMPEACH!
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-07-29-gallup-poll_x.htm
Looks like he's still 4 points better than Clinton's high water mark for
disapproval. Were you calling for Clinton's impeachment back then?
Would you call someone who lied about a little White House
nookie with a willing partner comparable to someone who lied
to get our and other countries into a totally unnecessary war
which has led to the deaths of over 1800 of our soldiers? If
you say yes, you are less than human.
I would call someone who lied about a little White House nookie a liar. When
that lie is uttered under oath, in an effort to undermine and frustrate a
legal process, it is a felony, and grounds for impeachment under the
American legal system. Conversely, low approval ratings is not. None of this
is to say that Bush is a better leader than Clinton. he is not. But that
does not make every wild and hypocritical accusation thrown against him by
raving lunatics like Yang valid.
Now that we got that out of the way, what is your proof that Bush lied in
order to go to war?
Clinton had some sex.
Which is not the issue. He lied about what he did. He commited perjury and
later, obstruction of justice.
Bush committed treason. There is
no comparison.
Clinton lied under oath - an impeachable offence.
The definition of treason is " "Treason against the United States shall
consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies,
giving them aid and comfort." If you have proof of Bush doing this, I'd be
interested in seeing it.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL's Disapproval Rating Hits 50% for the First Time |
02 Aug 2005 09:24:21 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 01:20:58 GMT, "zztop8970" <none@tospeakof.com>
wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:e29ue1hihbuek385rsf0k9juqe64931jac@4ax.com...
CHIMPEACH!
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-07-29-gallup-poll_x.htm
Looks like he's still 4 points better than Clinton's high water mark for
disapproval. Were you calling for Clinton's impeachment back then?
Why should I when you NeoCon traitors were calling for his head then?
I mean lying about a war is nothing compared to getting a *****
right?
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1805 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
|
| User: "zztop8970" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL's Disapproval Rating Hits 50% for the First Time |
02 Aug 2005 10:24:36 PM |
|
|
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:uka0f1drdrlimf7jr4a4ug5qui3jgrla4j@4ax.com...
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 01:20:58 GMT, "zztop8970" <none@tospeakof.com>
wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:e29ue1hihbuek385rsf0k9juqe64931jac@4ax.com...
CHIMPEACH!
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-07-29-gallup-poll_x.htm
Looks like he's still 4 points better than Clinton's high water mark for
disapproval. Were you calling for Clinton's impeachment back then?
Why should I
Because you apparently think that when a president's disapproval rating hits
50%, he should be impeached. Otherwise, why would you have bothered to post
what you did?
when you NeoCon traitors were calling for his head then?
I mean lying about a war is nothing compared to getting a *****
right?
If you think he should be impeached for lying about a war, you can try to
make a case for that. But you didn't. You called for his impeachemnt over
his disapproval ratings.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL's Disapproval Rating Hits 50% for the First Time |
03 Aug 2005 12:00:06 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 03:24:36 GMT, "zztop8970" <none@tospeakof.com>
wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:uka0f1drdrlimf7jr4a4ug5qui3jgrla4j@4ax.com...
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 01:20:58 GMT, "zztop8970" <none@tospeakof.com>
wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:e29ue1hihbuek385rsf0k9juqe64931jac@4ax.com...
CHIMPEACH!
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-07-29-gallup-poll_x.htm
Looks like he's still 4 points better than Clinton's high water mark for
disapproval. Were you calling for Clinton's impeachment back then?
Why should I
Because you apparently think that when a president's disapproval rating hits
50%, he should be impeached. Otherwise, why would you have bothered to post
what you did?
when you NeoCon traitors were calling for his head then?
I mean lying about a war is nothing compared to getting a *****
right?
If you think he should be impeached for lying about a war, you can try to
make a case for that. But you didn't. You called for his impeachemnt over
his disapproval ratings.
No, lower approval rate makes it easier. BTW where's that WMD again,
*****?
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1805 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
|
| User: "zztop8970" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL's Disapproval Rating Hits 50% for the First Time |
03 Aug 2005 09:19:00 AM |
|
|
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:toj0f1tfq2r4cg50063rq41b41r3njo4lp@4ax.com...
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 03:24:36 GMT, "zztop8970" <none@tospeakof.com>
wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:uka0f1drdrlimf7jr4a4ug5qui3jgrla4j@4ax.com...
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 01:20:58 GMT, "zztop8970" <none@tospeakof.com>
wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:e29ue1hihbuek385rsf0k9juqe64931jac@4ax.com...
CHIMPEACH!
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-07-29-gallup-poll_x.htm
Looks like he's still 4 points better than Clinton's high water mark
for
disapproval. Were you calling for Clinton's impeachment back then?
Why should I
Because you apparently think that when a president's disapproval rating
hits
50%, he should be impeached. Otherwise, why would you have bothered to
post
what you did?
when you NeoCon traitors were calling for his head then?
I mean lying about a war is nothing compared to getting a *****
right?
If you think he should be impeached for lying about a war, you can try to
make a case for that. But you didn't. You called for his impeachemnt over
his disapproval ratings.
No, lower approval rate makes it easier.
How so? AFAIK, impeachment proceedings have nothing to do with approval
ratings.
So again I ask you, if you're making your case based on approval ratings,
did you make the same call when Clinton's disapproval hit 54%?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
