Religions > Atheism > AWOL's SCOTUS Nom Fought Against Letting Women into Princeton (GOP, The American Taliban)
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
| Date: |
28 Nov 2005 09:05:57 PM |
| Object: |
AWOL's SCOTUS Nom Fought Against Letting Women into Princeton (GOP, The American Taliban) |
That's right, they should be barefoot, pregnent, and cooking in the
kitchen!
http://obsidianwings.blogs.com/obsidian_wings/2005/11/alito_and_cap.html
"CAP supported a quota system to ensure that the vast majority of
students would continue to be men. Asa Bushnell, then chairman of CAP,
told the New York Times in 1974 that “Many Princeton graduates are
unhappy over the fact that the administration has seen fit to abrogate
the virtual guarantee that 800 [out of roughly 1,100] would continue
to be the number of males in each freshman class.”"
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -2107 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
-----
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
-duke (duckgumbo32@cox.net), aka PedophilEarl J Weber, 63
year old mateless, heirless biological failure
of Afton Oaks Apartment, Baton Rouge, on why
a Neocon chickenhawk like him pussied out of
the Vietnam War.
.
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL's SCOTUS Nom Fought Against Letting Women into Princeton (GOP, The American Taliban) |
29 Nov 2005 09:09:58 AM |
|
|
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:6pgno1dj8420a88ho7lvqud504gepsu0aq@4ax.com...
That's right, they should be barefoot, pregnent, and cooking in the
kitchen!
So, we see your agenda.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL's SCOTUS Nom Fought Against Letting Women into Princeton (GOP, The American Taliban) |
29 Nov 2005 09:58:55 AM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:6pgno1dj8420a88ho7lvqud504gepsu0aq@4ax.com...
That's right, they should be barefoot, pregnent, and cooking in the
kitchen!
So, we see your agenda.
Yes, equality for all. Unlike your agenda. What you snipped from his
post is the explanation of his sarcasrtic remark about the article that
he posted, and his view of the subject's opinion.
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL's SCOTUS Nom Fought Against Letting Women into Princeton (GOP, The American Taliban) |
30 Nov 2005 02:02:21 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:09:58 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:6pgno1dj8420a88ho7lvqud504gepsu0aq@4ax.com...
That's right, they should be barefoot, pregnent, and cooking in the
kitchen!
So, we see your agenda.
No, you see your Party of Treason's agenda.
http://obsidianwings.blogs.com/obsidian_wings/2005/11/alito_and_cap.html
"CAP supported a quota system to ensure that the vast majority of
students would continue to be men. Asa Bushnell, then chairman of CAP,
told the New York Times in 1974 that “Many Princeton graduates are
unhappy over the fact that the administration has seen fit to abrogate
the virtual guarantee that 800 [out of roughly 1,100] would continue
to be the number of males in each freshman class.”"
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -2107 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
-----
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
-duke (duckgumbo32@cox.net), aka PedophilEarl J Weber, 63
year old mateless, heirless biological failure
of Afton Oaks Apartment, Baton Rouge, on why
a Neocon chickenhawk like him pussied out of
the Vietnam War.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL's SCOTUS Nom Fought Against Letting Women into Princeton (GOP, The American Taliban) |
30 Nov 2005 09:41:41 AM |
|
|
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:b4nqo1dq7ldr38ubqkfsspqbot8m03eep3@4ax.com...
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:09:58 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:6pgno1dj8420a88ho7lvqud504gepsu0aq@4ax.com...
That's right, they should be barefoot, pregnent, and cooking in the
kitchen!
So, we see your agenda.
No, you see your Party of Treason's agenda.
You're saying you did not type this sentence:
"That's right, they should be barefoot, pregnent, and cooking in the
kitchen!"
Why are you backtracking now?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: AWOL's SCOTUS Nom Fought Against Letting Women into Princeton (GOP, The American Taliban) |
30 Nov 2005 10:02:40 AM |
|
|
Johnny wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:b4nqo1dq7ldr38ubqkfsspqbot8m03eep3@4ax.com...
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:09:58 -0500, "Johnny" <wxpprofessional@msn.com>
wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:6pgno1dj8420a88ho7lvqud504gepsu0aq@4ax.com...
That's right, they should be barefoot, pregnent, and cooking in the
kitchen!
So, we see your agenda.
No, you see your Party of Treason's agenda.
You're saying you did not type this sentence:
"That's right, they should be barefoot, pregnent, and cooking in the
kitchen!"
Why are you backtracking now?
No. You are taking the statement out of context, and taking away the
fact that the statement was made sarcastically. Therefore, since you
have removed the context, you are effectively lying about what he said,
since without the context it means something very different than what
it does with the context.
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
