| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Douglas D. Anderson" |
| Date: |
17 Sep 2005 09:42:48 PM |
| Object: |
Bad news for atheists |
The Declaration of Independence, the bulwark and foundation
of America, declares that /rights/ come from our creator,
hence men can not take them away. Because atheists do not
have a creator, they have no rights. Feel free to persecute
atheists.
.
|
|
| User: "Mos Not@YourHouse" |
|
| Title: Re: Bad news for atheists |
21 Sep 2005 04:32:36 PM |
|
|
"Larry Krzewinski" <Feerless_Freep@madmagazine.com> wrote
in message news:0tg3j1dtipsd5fp28ru3jgirlud9ugg93o@4ax.com
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:56:31 -0600, "Mos" <Not@YourHouse>
wrote:
So what beliefs do you have to qualify for being an
atheist?
If you have to ask, you must not really be one.
You are really having a hard time with the concept of
just not having a belief, aren't you.
Then what is the belief you don't have ?
I believe I can fly...
Hey, this is a drug free NewsGroup !!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Larry Krzewinski" |
|
| Title: Re: Bad news for atheists |
21 Sep 2005 05:47:45 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:32:36 -0600, "Mos" <Not@YourHouse> wrote:
So what beliefs do you have to qualify for being an
atheist?
If you have to ask, you must not really be one.
You are really having a hard time with the concept of
just not having a belief, aren't you.
Then what is the belief you don't have ?
I believe I can fly...
Hey, this is a drug free NewsGroup !!
I believe I can touch the sky...
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Greg Evans" |
|
| Title: Re: Bad news for atheists |
21 Sep 2005 08:43:28 AM |
|
|
Kate wrote:
So what beliefs do you have to qualify for being an
atheist?
If you have to ask, you must not really be one.
You are really having a hard time with the concept of
just not having a belief, aren't you.
Probably less of a hard time than you are with the concept of just not
having a sense of humor. Or, failing that, a killfile.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mos Not@YourHouse" |
|
| Title: Re: Bad news for atheists |
21 Sep 2005 08:57:33 AM |
|
|
"Greg Evans" <misterx@larkbooks.com> wrote in message
news:3pd6c1F9k7t2U1@individual.net
Kate wrote:
So what beliefs do you have to qualify for being an
atheist?
If you have to ask, you must not really be one.
You are really having a hard time with the concept of
just not having a belief, aren't you.
Probably less of a hard time than you are with the
concept of just not having a sense of humor. Or, failing
that, a killfile.
She may eventually realize not having a belief *is* a belief.
.
|
|
|
| User: "wbarwell" |
|
| Title: Re: Bad news for atheists |
21 Sep 2005 12:25:00 PM |
|
|
Mos wrote:
"Greg Evans" <misterx@larkbooks.com> wrote in message
news:3pd6c1F9k7t2U1@individual.net
Kate wrote:
So what beliefs do you have to qualify for being an
atheist?
If you have to ask, you must not really be one.
You are really having a hard time with the concept of
just not having a belief, aren't you.
Probably less of a hard time than you are with the
concept of just not having a sense of humor. Or, failing
that, a killfile.
She may eventually realize not having a belief *is* a belief.
Atheism is about beleiving two things.
1. Theist cannot prove god exists and do not do so.
2. God as defined is fairly easy to debunk.
Part 1
IS THERE A GOD?
Strong Atheism's answer.
A BASIC DEFINITION OF GOD.
The general overarching definition of god as per
the major religions of the world is:
A. God is personal, God has will and conciousness.
B. God has free will.
C. God is the creator of all.
D. God is omnipotent.
E. God is omnibenevolent.
F. God is omniscient.
G. God is that which nothing more powerful
can be imagined.
These are the basic attributes that can be claimed for
the god of orthodox Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and
Hinduism.
Omnibenevolence and omniscience are actually logically
derivable from the claimed attribute of omnipotence and
so aren't not truely independent attributes, and may be
considered special aspects of omnipotence.
There are other attributes of god, that he is the only
such god, that he is is immortal and that god has always
existed that are not important for this discussion and for
now, can be ignored. They are secondary arguments and in
no way are foundational or truely necessary, except those
that can be logically derived from the attributes listed
above.
A CLASS OF GODS
It is important to note here that this is a definition
not for a particular god, but an entire class of gods.
Sub-theories about god are not important here. Christianity
claims one may attain salvation only through Jesus, Islam
claims the Christian dogma that Jesus was the son of god is
blasphemous. Ideas like this though, are of little importance
to the overarching and general claims made for a personal,
creator, omni-everything god. I have coined a term,
The Grand God of Grand Theologies for this sort of god.
Grand theologies are those theologies that have adopted this
class of god as their basic attributes concerning the nature
of god. But it is important to remember here that what is
being discussed here is a class of gods, not particular gods.
THE FOUR GREAT THEOLOGICAL TRADITIONS
Again, Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Hinduism hold
to this basic Grand God and are typical Grand Theologies
holding to this basic class of god as their basic
definitions of what god is at god's most basic level.
A big problem with this class of gods is, it collapses
rather easily into internal self contradiction.
THE PROBLEM OF EVIL.
The problem of evil was first written down by Epicurus
in about the third century BCE.
Today's formulation is:
A. God is defined as omnipotent;
B. and as omnibenevolent.
C. Evil exists.
D. God therefore, is not omnipotent as claimed.
E. Or God is not omnibenevolent as claimed.
F. Or god is neither omnipotent or omnibenevolent.
G. Or god is not existant.
THE FREE WILL DEFENSE
The free will defense of the problem of evil goes back
to St. Augustine who popularized it. It is still popular,
and is championed most notably today by Alvin Plantinga.
God gave man free will. Man freely chooses to do evil.
Ability to do evil is less evil than lacking free will.
THE FREE WILL DEFENSE DEBUNKED.
God has free will.
God is omnibenevolent, he has a good nature incapable
of doing evil.
A. If god can have free will, and a good nature, this good
nature is not allowed to cound againts god's free will.
B. Nor is god's lack of ability to do evil
allowed to count against god's omnipotence.
C. Likewise, man could easily have a god like
free will and a god like good nature.
D. Inabilty then to do evil would no more count against
man's free will than it does for god's free will.
E. If so, it also counts against god's free will and god
does not have free will as claimed.
F. If god does not have absolute and total free will, thus
free will is not a true necessity at all.
F. If god is omnipotent and omnibenevolent, and can give
man a god like free will and a god like good nature
incapable of moral evil, god must do so or god is not
moral, not omnibenevolent.
G. Evil exists because he allows it to.
So free will does not exist, or it does and we can have
a god like free will and a god like good nature.
Either way, free will cannot explain away the existance
of evil. This free will defense then, is a failed argument.
OMNISCIENCE VERSUS CREATORHOOD OF GOD
God is defined as creator of all in most religions.
And god is claimed to be omniscient, all knowing.
A. God created the Universe and all in it.
B. God is omniscient, all knowing, he knows all in
the Universe and he knows the future of the Universe
and its contents.
C. If god creates a Universe, he will know that in 13 billion
years this Universe will have a man named John Smith in it.
D. If John Smith is good and saved, or evil and damned, God
will know that.
E. As he knows that the Universe in its present state will
have a John Smith, god may then contemplate the future state
of Smith and decide if he will tolerate an evil Smith.
F. If yes, Smith will be evil only because of a specific
personal
and will choice made solely by god.
G. If Smith is evil, then evil exists solely because of a choice
made by god. In fact all moral evil done by creations of god
will be evil and do evil only because of personal and willful
creations of god allowing evil acts to be done, by direct
decision of god.
H. If evil exists in a world with an omniscient creator god, it
is
solely and only because god allows evil.
I. If evil exists solely because of personal choices of god, god
then is not as defined, omnibenevolent.
J. Man and any other sentient being in such a Universe cannot
have
any free will, not even in principle. A Universe with a god
that creates all and knows all precludes free will for all
beings god creates in the strongest possible manner.
The Grand God of Grand
Theology is thus self destroying, it is incoherent
and contradictory as a theory.
THE SITUATION SO FAR.
1. A minimalistic class of gods is defined, this Grand God,
has been defined here with as few terms as possible.
2. The problem of evil dooms such a claimed god.
3. The attempted defence, free will is fatally flawed.
God's good nature and free will doom claims free
will makes evil necessary for man to have free will.
4. Omniscience and creatorhood of god further doom claims of
god's omnibenevolence and man's free will Free will cannot
exist for man. All evil is the direct and knowing creation
of god contradicting claims of omnibenevolence.
5. Since Free will for man is totally impossible, free will
cannot be a good quality, much less neccesary.
Here, the Grand God of Grand Theology has collapsed. As has Grand
Theology. As pointed out, this destroys the claims and viability
of an entire class of possible gods, all secondary and tertiary
claims for such a god of this class also fail, as do dogmas or
secondary claims.
If a these Grand Gods cannot exist as defined, specific gods
cannot, nor can claims such as this or that Grand God sent this
or that relevation to man or some prophet.
***********
--
The official spokesman of the Foxes said
today that investigation into what happened
to the henhouse may be needed.
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
| User: "ynotssor" |
|
| Title: Re: Bad news for atheists |
21 Sep 2005 12:31:11 PM |
|
|
"wbarwell" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
news:11j34vnmm3kq36@corp.supernews.com
You are really having a hard time with the concept of
just not having a belief, aren't you.
Probably less of a hard time than you are with the
concept of just not having a sense of humor. Or, failing
that, a killfile.
She may eventually realize not having a belief *is* a belief.
Atheism is about beleiving two things.
1). There are no atheists.
2). There is no evidence that agnostics exist.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mos Not@YourHouse" |
|
| Title: Re: Bad news for atheists |
21 Sep 2005 12:47:21 PM |
|
|
"ynotssor" <ynotssor@example.net> wrote in message
news:3pdjnaF9uv48U1@individual.net
"wbarwell" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
news:11j34vnmm3kq36@corp.supernews.com
You are really having a hard time with the concept of
just not having a belief, aren't you.
Probably less of a hard time than you are with the
concept of just not having a sense of humor. Or,
failing that, a killfile.
She may eventually realize not having a belief *is* a
belief.
Atheism is about beleiving two things.
1). There are no atheists.
2). There is no evidence that agnostics exist.
And us so called "Pagans" are too busy having
drunken orgies to care.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Bad news for atheists |
21 Sep 2005 02:14:28 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:31:11 -0700, "ynotssor" <ynotssor@example.net>
wrote:
"wbarwell" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
news:11j34vnmm3kq36@corp.supernews.com
You are really having a hard time with the concept of
just not having a belief, aren't you.
Probably less of a hard time than you are with the
concept of just not having a sense of humor. Or, failing
that, a killfile.
She may eventually realize not having a belief *is* a belief.
Atheism is about beleiving two things.
No - it's about not being theist.
1). There are no atheists.
What am I liar, Scotch Mist?
2). There is no evidence that agnostics exist.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "old guy? Heck!" |
|
| Title: Re: Bad news for atheists |
21 Sep 2005 01:05:10 PM |
|
|
ynotssor wrote:
"wbarwell" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
news:11j34vnmm3kq36@corp.supernews.com
You are really having a hard time with the concept of
just not having a belief, aren't you.
Probably less of a hard time than you are with the
concept of just not having a sense of humor. Or, failing
that, a killfile.
She may eventually realize not having a belief *is* a belief.
Atheism is about beleiving two things.
1). There are no atheists.
2). There is no evidence that agnostics exist.
There are no theists - just a bunch of scared humans trying to convince
themselves they will exist forever in some form or other.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mos Not@YourHouse" |
|
| Title: Re: Bad news for atheists |
21 Sep 2005 02:10:14 PM |
|
|
"old guy? Heck!" <AT_Tappman@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1127325910.915524.59660@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
ynotssor wrote:
Atheism is about beleiving two things.
1). There are no atheists.
2). There is no evidence that agnostics exist.
There are no theists - just a bunch of scared humans
trying to convince themselves they will exist forever in
some form or other.
Much akin to people having children so a part
of them will continue to live on......
.
|
|
|
| User: "ynotssor" |
|
| Title: Re: Bad news for atheists |
21 Sep 2005 02:18:14 PM |
|
|
"Mos" <Not@YourHouse> wrote in message
news:GOidneV4S5SBLazeRVn-gg@pcisys.net
There are no theists - just a bunch of scared humans
trying to convince themselves they will exist forever in
some form or other.
Much akin to people having children so a part
of them will continue to live on......
.... and who never learn to exist outside the material DNA
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Bad news for atheists |
21 Sep 2005 09:04:52 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:57:33 -0600, "Mos" <Not@YourHouse> wrote:
"Greg Evans" <misterx@larkbooks.com> wrote in message
news:3pd6c1F9k7t2U1@individual.net
Kate wrote:
So what beliefs do you have to qualify for being an
atheist?
If you have to ask, you must not really be one.
You are really having a hard time with the concept of
just not having a belief, aren't you.
Probably less of a hard time than you are with the
concept of just not having a sense of humor. Or, failing
that, a killfile.
She may eventually realize not having a belief *is* a belief.
Idiot.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: Bad news for atheists |
21 Sep 2005 09:31:02 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:43:28 -0400, "Greg Evans"
<misterx@larkbooks.com> wrote:
Kate wrote:
So what beliefs do you have to qualify for being an
atheist?
If you have to ask, you must not really be one.
You are really having a hard time with the concept of
just not having a belief, aren't you.
Probably less of a hard time than you are with the concept of just not
having a sense of humor. Or, failing that, a killfile.
He sounds exactly like the hundreds of theists - some trolls and some
not that come here daily to tell me what I am and what I believe.
Sorry if the humor wore off about 5 years ago.
If he wants to joke about it, maybe a little original material would
be in order.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mos Not@YourHouse" |
|
| Title: Re: Bad news for atheists |
21 Sep 2005 09:53:16 AM |
|
|
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:43d66da1.1181384765@news-west.newscene.com
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:43:28 -0400, "Greg Evans"
Kate wrote:
So what beliefs do you have to qualify for being an
atheist?
If you have to ask, you must not really be one.
You are really having a hard time with the concept of
just not having a belief, aren't you.
Probably less of a hard time than you are with the
concept of just not having a sense of humor. Or, failing
that, a killfile.
He sounds exactly like the hundreds of theists - some
trolls and some not that come here daily to tell me what
I am and what I believe.
Sorry if the humor wore off about 5 years ago.
If he wants to joke about it, maybe a little original
material would be in order.
Everybody got their panties in an uproar because
of the comment about beliefs, values, and practices.
I made no claims about what anybody is or what
they believe. People got too defensive / offensive
real fast by reading too much into things.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: Bad news for atheists |
21 Sep 2005 08:15:01 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:53:16 -0600, "Mos" <Not@YourHouse> wrote:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:43d66da1.1181384765@news-west.newscene.com
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:43:28 -0400, "Greg Evans"
Kate wrote:
So what beliefs do you have to qualify for being an
atheist?
If you have to ask, you must not really be one.
You are really having a hard time with the concept of
just not having a belief, aren't you.
Probably less of a hard time than you are with the
concept of just not having a sense of humor. Or, failing
that, a killfile.
He sounds exactly like the hundreds of theists - some
trolls and some not that come here daily to tell me what
I am and what I believe.
Sorry if the humor wore off about 5 years ago.
If he wants to joke about it, maybe a little original
material would be in order.
Everybody got their panties in an uproar because
of the comment about beliefs, values, and practices.
I made no claims about what anybody is or what
they believe. People got too defensive / offensive
real fast by reading too much into things.
LOL, every day we have a dozen stupid theists in here making the same
claim that you just did. They always mean the same thing for the same
reasons - and it ain't pretty.
If you don't want to be judged a pig, stay out of the wallow.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mos Not@YourHouse" |
|
| Title: Re: Bad news for atheists |
21 Sep 2005 08:33:14 PM |
|
|
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:43df04e0.1220103609@news-west.newscene.com
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:53:16 -0600, "Mos" <Not@YourHouse>
Everybody got their panties in an uproar because
of the comment about beliefs, values, and practices.
I made no claims about what anybody is or what
they believe. People got too defensive / offensive
real fast by reading too much into things.
LOL, every day we have a dozen stupid theists in here
making the same claim that you just did. They always
mean the same thing for the same reasons - and it ain't
pretty.
Truly, I did not mean offense nor to upset anyone.
Being witnessed to by well meaning dorks that want
to foist their beliefs off on others is most annoying.
To me, I was stating an observation, but what does
a 19 year old know......
If you don't want to be judged a pig, stay out of the
wallow.
mmm.......barbeque pig.....
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: Bad news for atheists |
21 Sep 2005 10:25:03 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 19:33:14 -0600, "Mos" <Not@YourHouse> wrote:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:43df04e0.1220103609@news-west.newscene.com
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:53:16 -0600, "Mos" <Not@YourHouse>
Everybody got their panties in an uproar because
of the comment about beliefs, values, and practices.
I made no claims about what anybody is or what
they believe. People got too defensive / offensive
real fast by reading too much into things.
LOL, every day we have a dozen stupid theists in here
making the same claim that you just did. They always
mean the same thing for the same reasons - and it ain't
pretty.
Truly, I did not mean offense nor to upset anyone.
Being witnessed to by well meaning dorks that want
to foist their beliefs off on others is most annoying.
To me, I was stating an observation, but what does
a 19 year old know......
You didn't offend anyone.
You didn't get any respect, but what did you expect.
If you don't want to be judged a pig, stay out of the
wallow.
mmm.......barbeque pig.....
Didn't mean to start you salivating.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Milton J. Smuthworthy, I" |
|
| Title: Re: Bad news for atheists |
21 Sep 2005 09:16:02 PM |
|
|
Then "Mos" says:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:43df04e0.1220103609@news-west.newscene.com
LOL, every day we have a dozen stupid theists in here
making the same claim that you just did. They always
Kate, rec.humor is devoted to original material. Your material
is posted 1,000 times a day on Usenet and has been for 20 years.
You're just a imitative boring parrot to us, as interesting
as wallpaper.
Kate, we don't want your uninspiring, unoriginal,
religious crap regardless of which side of the issue you're
on. We've all heard it 10,000 times. Over and over and
over and over. We don't even like to hear good jokes twice.
We really don't appreciate bandwidth-wasting no-talent morons
like yourself insulting intelligent and creative posters like Mos.
"Kate" = "Stupid time-wasting alt.atheism cross-poster"
Truly, I did not mean offense nor to upset anyone.
Being witnessed to by well meaning dorks that want
to foist their beliefs off on others is most annoying.
To me, I was stating an observation, but what does
a 19 year old know......
No need to apologize to these cross-posting idiots. Just ignore
them and eventually they'll stop spamming us.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mos Not@YourHouse" |
|
| Title: Re: Bad news for atheists |
22 Sep 2005 09:29:48 AM |
|
|
"Milton J. Smuthworthy, I" <tonworthyCLOTHES@SexMagnet.com>
wrote in message news:43321373$0$6846$bb4e3ad8@newscene.com
Then "Mos" says:
Truly, I did not mean offense nor to upset anyone.
Being witnessed to by well meaning dorks that want
to foist their beliefs off on others is most annoying.
To me, I was stating an observation, but what does
a 19 year old know......
No need to apologize to these cross-posting idiots. Just
ignore them and eventually they'll stop spamming us.
I'm talking to the lady here, and you never know, she
just might show me her tits.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: Bad news for atheists |
21 Sep 2005 10:33:22 PM |
|
|
On 21 Sep 2005 21:16:02 -0500, "Milton J. Smuthworthy, I"
<tonworthyCLOTHES@SexMagnet.com> wrote:
Then "Mos" says:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:43df04e0.1220103609@news-west.newscene.com
LOL, every day we have a dozen stupid theists in here
making the same claim that you just did. They always
Kate, rec.humor is devoted to original material. Your material
is posted 1,000 times a day on Usenet and has been for 20 years.
You're just a imitative boring parrot to us, as interesting
as wallpaper.
So crossposting weenie newbie questions to other newsgroups on their
main subject was some sort of an excercise to look for new material?
Well it's an original idea, in a kind of falling-on-your-face-futile
way.
Kate, we don't want your uninspiring, unoriginal,
religious crap regardless of which side of the issue you're
on. We've all heard it 10,000 times. Over and over and
over and over. We don't even like to hear good jokes twice.
We really don't appreciate bandwidth-wasting no-talent morons
like yourself insulting intelligent and creative posters like Mos.
So you just thought you'd add your lamo opinion and make sure everyone
put you on their killfile for sheer bordom, did you?
"Kate" = "Stupid time-wasting alt.atheism cross-poster"
Truly, I did not mean offense nor to upset anyone.
Being witnessed to by well meaning dorks that want
to foist their beliefs off on others is most annoying.
To me, I was stating an observation, but what does
a 19 year old know......
No need to apologize to these cross-posting idiots. Just ignore
them and eventually they'll stop spamming us.
'scuse me? You think you all aren't crossposting too?
So, when did mommy buy your computer? At the AOL shop yesterday?
Kate
Don't you just love humor groups? They are infested with 12 year olds
who think they have something interesting to say.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mos Not@YourHouse" |
|
| Title: Re: Bad news for atheists |
22 Sep 2005 09:28:33 AM |
|
|
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:43e323d1.1228024250@news-west.newscene.com
Don't you just love humor groups? They are infested with
12 year olds who think they have something interesting to
say.
Hey, I'm the only teenager here.
He's just in a pissy mood today.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "ynotssor" |
|
| Title: Re: Bad news for atheists |
21 Sep 2005 11:44:04 PM |
|
|
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:43e323d1.1228024250@news-west.newscene.com
So you just thought you'd add your lamo opinion and make sure everyone
put you on their killfile for sheer bordom, did you?
I have everybody killfiled except myself. That way I can get straight to the
good stuff.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mos Not@YourHouse" |
|
| Title: Re: Bad news for atheists |
22 Sep 2005 09:30:21 AM |
|
|
"ynotssor" <ynotssor@example.net> wrote in message
news:3per55Fa24l4U1@individual.net
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:43e323d1.1228024250@news-west.newscene.com
So you just thought you'd add your lamo opinion and make
sure everyone put you on their killfile for sheer
bordom, did you?
I have everybody killfiled except myself. That way I can
get straight to the good stuff.
Figures you don't use foreplay.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: Bad news for atheists |
21 Sep 2005 11:54:02 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:44:04 -0700, "ynotssor" <ynotssor@example.net>
wrote:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:43e323d1.1228024250@news-west.newscene.com
So you just thought you'd add your lamo opinion and make sure everyone
put you on their killfile for sheer bordom, did you?
I have everybody killfiled except myself. That way I can get straight to the
good stuff.
(psssst) The good stuff isn't straight.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Greg Evans" |
|
| Title: Re: Bad news for atheists |
22 Sep 2005 09:26:07 AM |
|
|
Kate wrote:
Don't you just love humor groups? They are infested with 12
year olds who think they have something interesting to say.
You just described 99% of all Usenet. Log in your own eye....
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Milton J. Smuthworthy, I" |
|
| Title: Re: Bad news for atheists |
21 Sep 2005 10:08:03 PM |
|
|
Then "Milton J. Smuthworthy, I" says:
Then "Mos" says:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote in message
news:43df04e0.1220103609@news-west.newscene.com
LOL, every day we have a dozen stupid theists in here
making the same claim that you just did. They always
Kate, rec.humor is devoted to original material. Your material
is posted 1,000 times a day on Usenet and has been for 20 years.
You're just a imitative boring parrot to us, as interesting
as wallpaper.
Kate, we don't want your uninspiring, unoriginal,
religious crap regardless of which side of the issue you're
on. We've all heard it 10,000 times. Over and over and
over and over. We don't even like to hear good jokes twice.
We really don't appreciate bandwidth-wasting no-talent morons
like yourself insulting intelligent and creative posters like Mos.
"Kate" = "Stupid time-wasting alt.atheism cross-poster"
And that goes for your cat too.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Larry Krzewinski" |
|
| Title: Re: Bad news for atheists |
21 Sep 2005 09:13:21 PM |
|
|
On 21 Sep 2005 20:15:01 -0500, (Kate ) wrote:
If you don't want to be judged a pig, stay out of the wallow.
Mos tends to wallow more than most so don't hold your breath.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mos Not@YourHouse" |
|
| Title: Re: Bad news for atheists |
22 Sep 2005 09:32:48 AM |
|
|
"Larry Krzewinski" <Feerless_Freep@madmagazine.com> wrote
in message news:bp44j19ct6vmgv6ku0tu52q5oor870uq50@4ax.com
On 21 Sep 2005 20:15:01 -0500, (Kate
) wrote:
If you don't want to be judged a pig, stay out of the
wallow.
Mos tends to wallow more than most so don't hold your
breath.
With all the kak adults produce, wadda expect.
.
|
|
|
| User: "SummersFrenzy" |
|
| Title: Re: Bad news for atheists |
22 Sep 2005 02:10:29 PM |
|
|
Mos wrote:
With all the kak adults produce, wadda expect.
Point of order . . . now that you're over 18, you qualify as an adult - in
all 50 states, if memory serves. They just won't let you be a grown-up and
drink legally until you're 21.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Therion Ware" |
|
| Title: Re: Bad news for atheists |
22 Sep 2005 02:44:27 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:10:29 -0600 in alt.atheism, SummersFrenzy
("SummersFrenzy" <icediamond_desire@hotmail.com>) said, directing the
reply to alt.atheism
Mos wrote:
With all the kak adults produce, wadda expect.
Point of order . . . now that you're over 18, you qualify as an adult - in
all 50 states, if memory serves. They just won't let you be a grown-up and
drink legally until you're 21.
Well, at least you can join up and get shot at for your country, which
may be a compensation.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
