| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
07 Feb 2005 11:21:29 PM |
| Object: |
Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says |
This is the one point that liberals just don't seem to get; it's not
about the parents. The best interest of the child always comes first.
To place a child in an awkward situation like that is cruel. Good
parents or not, the child will be open to ridicule amongst their peers.
http://www.365gay.com/newscon05/02/020305arkFoster.htm
Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says
Posted: February 3, 2005 5:01 pm. ET
(Little Rock Arkansas) Rep. Bob Adams (D-Sheridan) says that his bill
to ban the state from placing children in "homosexual homes" isn't
meant to discriminate against gays.
"Some people think this bill is an anti-gay bill; it is not," Adams
told a House committee meeting today. "It is not about the gay
population. It's about the children."
.
|
|
| User: "Tukla Ratte" |
|
| Title: Re: Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says |
09 Feb 2005 03:25:32 PM |
|
|
J Young wrote:
This is the one point that liberals just don't seem to get; it's not
about the parents. The best interest of the child always comes first.
To place a child in an awkward situation like that is cruel. Good
parents or not, the child will be open to ridicule amongst their peers.
Mostly the peers raised by people like you.
Besides, kids will be ridiculed over *anything* that's different.
Should parents who are unable to buy the latest $300 clothing fashion be
prevented from adopting?
< snip >
--
Tukla, Eater of Theists, Squeaker of Chew Toys
Official Mascot of Alt.Atheism, aa 1347
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says |
08 Feb 2005 12:19:48 PM |
|
|
On 7 Feb 2005 21:21:29 -0800, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
drained his beer, leaned back in the alt.atheism beanbag and drunkenly
proclaimed the following
This is the one point that liberals just don't seem to get; it's not
about the parents. The best interest of the child always comes first.
To place a child in an awkward situation like that is cruel. Good
parents or not, the child will be open to ridicule amongst their peers.
So, I should have been taken from mmy home because I was teased about
my father's British accent?
Over 200 studies dating back 25 years show that being raised by a same
sex couple is not harmful to children.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Riain" |
|
| Title: Re: Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says |
08 Feb 2005 05:33:04 PM |
|
|
But we can conclude that being raised by a heterosexual couple is =
harmful, they are the ones who bring up homosexual children, not to =
mention all sorts of criminals, and BIGOTS.
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message =
news:bm0i01dkdnfv1tflbmqiudml9vk9fodpf2@4ax.com...
: On 7 Feb 2005 21:21:29 -0800, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
: drained his beer, leaned back in the alt.atheism beanbag and drunkenly
: proclaimed the following
:=20
: >This is the one point that liberals just don't seem to get; it's not
: >about the parents. The best interest of the child always comes first.
: >To place a child in an awkward situation like that is cruel. Good
: >parents or not, the child will be open to ridicule amongst their =
peers.
:=20
: So, I should have been taken from mmy home because I was teased about
: my father's British accent?
:=20
: Over 200 studies dating back 25 years show that being raised by a same
: sex couple is not harmful to children.
: --=20
:=20
: Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
: Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
:=20
: "Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
: when they do it from religious conviction."
: Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sir Marksman" |
|
| Title: Re: Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says |
08 Feb 2005 05:41:11 PM |
|
|
"Riain" <riain@riain.com> wrote in message
news:9Y6dnYa0VrHZ1pTfRVn-ow@comcast.com...
But we can conclude that being raised by a heterosexual couple is harmful,
they are the ones who bring up homosexual children, not to mention all sorts
of criminals, and BIGOTS.
Bigots like you. How sad.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says |
08 Feb 2005 01:45:47 AM |
|
|
On 7 Feb 2005 21:21:29 -0800, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> said
in alt.atheism:
This is the one point that liberals just don't seem to get; it's not
about the parents. The best interest of the child always comes first.
To place a child in an awkward situation like that is cruel. Good
parents or not, the child will be open to ridicule amongst their peers.
I'm reminded of a TV show I watched, maybe 9 years ago, when I was
home sick and bored out of my skull. Sally Jesse Raphael, maybe?
Anyway, she had on a KKK family with a little boy and a black family
with a little girl. The kids were about 5. they were being kept in a
room offstage (with an adult watching them).
The KKK parents kept maintaining that they had raised their son
"right" and he would instinctively know to not have anything to do
with the black girl. After a little while of this kind of racist
nonsense, cameras and mics were turned on in the room the kids were
in.
Needless to say, he hadn't been "raised right". He was playing with
the little black girl just as if she were white. His parents were
appalled, but the black parents couldn't hide their amusement.
Now, which parents were better for their child? The parents who
taught hatred or the ones who taught acceptance?
--
If you are open to the point of gullibility and have not an
ounce of skeptical sense in you, then you cannot distinguish
the useful ideas from the worthless ones
- Carl Sagan, 1987.
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Susan Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says |
08 Feb 2005 04:04:47 AM |
|
|
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:n7rg015t9j09g89st1el3qlt9fi06fkhdh@4ax.com...
On 7 Feb 2005 21:21:29 -0800, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> said
in alt.atheism:
This is the one point that liberals just don't seem to get; it's not
about the parents. The best interest of the child always comes first.
To place a child in an awkward situation like that is cruel. Good
parents or not, the child will be open to ridicule amongst their peers.
I'm reminded of a TV show I watched, maybe 9 years ago, when I was
home sick and bored out of my skull. Sally Jesse Raphael, maybe?
It was Geraldo Rivera & two boys - one black, one white.
Other than that, you were right.
Anyway, she had on a KKK family with a little boy and a black family
with a little girl. The kids were about 5. they were being kept in a
room offstage (with an adult watching them).
The KKK parents kept maintaining that they had raised their son
"right" and he would instinctively know to not have anything to do
with the black girl. After a little while of this kind of racist
nonsense, cameras and mics were turned on in the room the kids were
in.
Needless to say, he hadn't been "raised right". He was playing with
the little black girl just as if she were white. His parents were
appalled, but the black parents couldn't hide their amusement.
And the KKK mother started complaining that she hadn't been properly
accomodated, but Rivera told her that she got the same accomodations
everyone else did.
I forget if the woman ran to get her son or not - not that it mattered, the
point was made: racism is NOT inherent, and can even be ignored when taught.
Susan
Now, which parents were better for their child? The parents who
taught hatred or the ones who taught acceptance?
--
If you are open to the point of gullibility and have not an
ounce of skeptical sense in you, then you cannot distinguish
the useful ideas from the worthless ones
- Carl Sagan, 1987.
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says |
08 Feb 2005 05:53:31 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 10:04:47 GMT, "Susan Cohen" <flavia13@verizon.net>
said in alt.atheism:
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:n7rg015t9j09g89st1el3qlt9fi06fkhdh@4ax.com...
I'm reminded of a TV show I watched, maybe 9 years ago, when I was
home sick and bored out of my skull. Sally Jesse Raphael, maybe?
It was Geraldo Rivera & two boys - one black, one white.
Different show, then. It was a boy and a girl and I never watched
Geraldo.
--
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious
conviction."
- Blaise Pascal (1623-1662)
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tukla Ratte" |
|
| Title: Re: Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says |
09 Feb 2005 03:21:11 PM |
|
|
Al Klein wrote:
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 10:04:47 GMT, "Susan Cohen" <flavia13@verizon.net>
said in alt.atheism:
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:n7rg015t9j09g89st1el3qlt9fi06fkhdh@4ax.com...
I'm reminded of a TV show I watched, maybe 9 years ago, when I was
home sick and bored out of my skull. Sally Jesse Raphael, maybe?
It was Geraldo Rivera & two boys - one black, one white.
Different show, then. It was a boy and a girl and I never watched
Geraldo.
I'm sure they copy from each other.
And isn't having Geraldo as your dad enough to get you mocked?
--
Tukla, Eater of Theists, Squeaker of Chew Toys
Official Mascot of Alt.Atheism, aa 1347
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says |
07 Feb 2005 11:56:21 PM |
|
|
On 7 Feb 2005 21:21:29 -0800, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote,
akin to the neighing and braying of farmyard animals:
This is the one point that liberals just don't seem to get; it's not
about the parents. The best interest of the child always comes first.
To place a child in an awkward situation like that is cruel. Good
parents or not, the child will be open to ridicule amongst their peers.
Whatever, dude. That's no better an excuse to stop gays adopting than
it is to stop people who live in trailers adopting.
It's not about the children - that's just an excuse for those who
don't even have the courage to admit their prejudices, but want to
enshrine them into law anyway.
---
"Question with boldness even the existence of a god;
because, if there be one, he must more approve of
the homage of reason, than that of blindfolded fear."
- Thomas Jefferson
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says |
08 Feb 2005 06:01:03 AM |
|
|
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:n1lg01ljai1m5tnmfgvlq6seps1rl0uho5@4ax.com...
On 7 Feb 2005 21:21:29 -0800, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote,
akin to the neighing and braying of farmyard animals:
This is the one point that liberals just don't seem to get; it's not
about the parents. The best interest of the child always comes first.
To place a child in an awkward situation like that is cruel. Good
parents or not, the child will be open to ridicule amongst their peers.
Whatever, dude. That's no better an excuse to stop gays adopting than
it is to stop people who live in trailers adopting.
It's not about the children - that's just an excuse for those who
don't even have the courage to admit their prejudices, but want to
enshrine them into law anyway.
Yes, that white christian heterosexual couple who starved, beat and tortured
their adopted children were such a better choice as parents, weren't they?
I hope they rot in jail :P
--
---------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says |
08 Feb 2005 06:07:21 AM |
|
|
Robibnikoff <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:n1lg01ljai1m5tnmfgvlq6seps1rl0uho5@4ax.com...
On 7 Feb 2005 21:21:29 -0800, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
wrote, akin to the neighing and braying of farmyard animals:
This is the one point that liberals just don't seem to get; it's not
about the parents. The best interest of the child always comes
first. To place a child in an awkward situation like that is cruel.
Good parents or not, the child will be open to ridicule amongst
their peers.
Whatever, dude. That's no better an excuse to stop gays adopting than
it is to stop people who live in trailers adopting.
It's not about the children - that's just an excuse for those who
don't even have the courage to admit their prejudices, but want to
enshrine them into law anyway.
Yes, that white christian heterosexual couple who starved, beat and
tortured their adopted children were such a better choice as parents,
weren't they?
I hope they rot in jail :P
This is what comes from shamefully stupid people. They ran to Utah, where
they were caught when the FBI tracked their cell phone signal. I mean
HELLO! Suspected felons should not use their cell phone! Who doesn't
know that your signal can be tracked? Christers can be the stupidest people
on the planet some times!
--
"Only Buddhism is compatible with science. It covers the smallest
particles to the largest creations of the cosmos. It is the only
religion capable of scientific truth."
Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "MarkA" |
|
| Title: Re: Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says |
08 Feb 2005 09:38:17 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 21:21:29 -0800, J Young wrote:
This is the one point that liberals just don't seem to get; it's not about
the parents. The best interest of the child always comes first. To place a
child in an awkward situation like that is cruel. Good parents or not, the
child will be open to ridicule amongst their peers.
http://www.365gay.com/newscon05/02/020305arkFoster.htm
Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says
Posted: February 3, 2005 5:01 pm. ET
(Little Rock Arkansas) Rep. Bob Adams (D-Sheridan) says that his bill to
ban the state from placing children in "homosexual homes" isn't meant to
discriminate against gays.
"Some people think this bill is an anti-gay bill; it is not," Adams told a
House committee meeting today. "It is not about the gay population. It's
about the children."
It seems to me that the logical solution is to work to remove the stigma
associated with being gay. Oh, NO!! There I go, promoting the "Gay Agenda!"
--
MarkA
(still caught in the maze of twisty little passages, all different)
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says |
10 Feb 2005 09:18:51 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 15:38:17 GMT, MarkA <manthony@stopspam.net> wrote:
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 21:21:29 -0800, J Young wrote:
This is the one point that liberals just don't seem to get; it's not about
the parents. The best interest of the child always comes first. To place a
child in an awkward situation like that is cruel. Good parents or not, the
child will be open to ridicule amongst their peers.
http://www.365gay.com/newscon05/02/020305arkFoster.htm
Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says
Posted: February 3, 2005 5:01 pm. ET
(Little Rock Arkansas) Rep. Bob Adams (D-Sheridan) says that his bill to
ban the state from placing children in "homosexual homes" isn't meant to
discriminate against gays.
"Some people think this bill is an anti-gay bill; it is not," Adams told a
House committee meeting today. "It is not about the gay population. It's
about the children."
It seems to me that the logical solution is to work to remove the stigma
associated with being gay. Oh, NO!! There I go, promoting the "Gay Agenda!"
WHAT!!!! How Un'merrikian! You actually mean (GASP!) value people
for themselves and not by some label? GAWRSCH! How much more
'librul' can you get!? (/mocking the bigots)
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
.
|
|
|
| User: "MarkA" |
|
| Title: Re: Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says |
10 Feb 2005 03:35:06 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 07:18:51 -0800, stoney wrote:
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 15:38:17 GMT, MarkA <manthony@stopspam.net> wrote:
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 21:21:29 -0800, J Young wrote:
This is the one point that liberals just don't seem to get; it's not
about the parents. The best interest of the child always comes first.
To place a child in an awkward situation like that is cruel. Good
parents or not, the child will be open to ridicule amongst their peers.
http://www.365gay.com/newscon05/02/020305arkFoster.htm
Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says
Posted: February 3, 2005 5:01 pm. ET
(Little Rock Arkansas) Rep. Bob Adams (D-Sheridan) says that his bill
to ban the state from placing children in "homosexual homes" isn't
meant to discriminate against gays.
"Some people think this bill is an anti-gay bill; it is not," Adams
told a House committee meeting today. "It is not about the gay
population. It's about the children."
It seems to me that the logical solution is to work to remove the stigma
associated with being gay. Oh, NO!! There I go, promoting the "Gay
Agenda!"
WHAT!!!! How Un'merrikian! You actually mean (GASP!) value people for
themselves and not by some label? GAWRSCH! How much more 'librul' can
you get!? (/mocking the bigots)
I guess I'll have to wear a pink triangle if I go to any of them "Red"
states!
--
MarkA
(still caught in the maze of twisty little passages, all different)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Riain" |
|
| Title: Re: Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says |
07 Feb 2005 11:59:24 PM |
|
|
You mean like black children were ridiculed by whites, like Jewish =
children were ridiculed by Christians, like fat children are ridiculed, =
like deaf children are ridiculed, like blind children are ridiculed, and =
like poor children are ridiculed?
So all these children should be take care of by the State -- That is =
called communism.=20
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message =
news:1107840089.185228.318350@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
: This is the one point that liberals just don't seem to get; it's not
: about the parents. The best interest of the child always comes first.
: To place a child in an awkward situation like that is cruel. Good
: parents or not, the child will be open to ridicule amongst their =
peers.
:=20
:=20
: http://www.365gay.com/newscon05/02/020305arkFoster.htm
:=20
: Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says
:=20
: Posted: February 3, 2005 5:01 pm. ET
:=20
: (Little Rock Arkansas) Rep. Bob Adams (D-Sheridan) says that his bill
: to ban the state from placing children in "homosexual homes" isn't
: meant to discriminate against gays.
:=20
: "Some people think this bill is an anti-gay bill; it is not," Adams
: told a House committee meeting today. "It is not about the gay
: population. It's about the children."
:
.
|
|
|
| User: "Charlie Wilkes" |
|
| Title: Re: Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says |
08 Feb 2005 10:32:01 PM |
|
|
In article <rNKdnXYzVseayJXfRVn-tw@comcast.com>,
"Riain" <riain@riain.com> wrote:
You mean like black children were ridiculed by whites, like Jewish
children were ridiculed by Christians, like fat children are ridiculed,
like deaf children are ridiculed, like blind children are ridiculed,
and like poor children are ridiculed?
Don't lump the fat kids in with the blind kids, Riain. That is unfair
to blind kids. Fat kids deserve to get ridiculed.
Charlie
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jeff Welch" |
|
| Title: Re: Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says |
09 Feb 2005 12:12:12 AM |
|
|
"Charlie Wilkes" <charliewilkes@news.easynews.com> wrote in message
news:lPKCClmxk0kN092yn@news.easynews.com...
Don't lump the fat kids in with the blind kids, Riain. That is unfair
to blind kids. Fat kids deserve to get ridiculed.
There's that compassionate conservatism again.
-Jeff
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says |
09 Feb 2005 12:49:33 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 22:12:12 -0800, "Jeff Welch" <prouddem@hotmail.com>
wrote:
"Charlie Wilkes" <charliewilkes@news.easynews.com> wrote in message
news:lPKCClmxk0kN092yn@news.easynews.com...
Don't lump the fat kids in with the blind kids, Riain. That is unfair
to blind kids. Fat kids deserve to get ridiculed.
There's that compassionate conservatism again.
Homosexuals would rather hear a young fat boy fart that hear a pretty
woman sing.
-Jeff
.
|
|
|
| User: "Charlie Wilkes" |
|
| Title: Re: Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says |
09 Feb 2005 07:27:38 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 06:49:33 GMT, wrote:
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 22:12:12 -0800, "Jeff Welch" <prouddem@hotmail.com>
wrote:
"Charlie Wilkes" <charliewilkes@news.easynews.com> wrote in message
news:lPKCClmxk0kN092yn@news.easynews.com...
Don't lump the fat kids in with the blind kids, Riain. That is unfair
to blind kids. Fat kids deserve to get ridiculed.
There's that compassionate conservatism again.
Homosexuals would rather hear a young fat boy fart that hear a pretty
woman sing.
Barbra Streisand used to be a pretty woman before she got old and
ugly, and the faggots like to hear her sing.
Charlie
.
|
|
|
| User: "Riain" |
|
| Title: Re: Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says |
09 Feb 2005 10:33:34 AM |
|
|
And her son is GAY!
"Charlie Wilkes" <charlie_wilkes@users.easynews.com> wrote in message =
news:ue4k01503tit50mtdp7cb5gdoqa69if1hh@4ax.com...
: On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 06:49:33 GMT, wrote:
:=20
: >On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 22:12:12 -0800, "Jeff Welch" =
<prouddem@hotmail.com>
: >wrote:
: >
: >>
: >>"Charlie Wilkes" <charliewilkes@news.easynews.com> wrote in message=20
: >>news:lPKCClmxk0kN092yn@news.easynews.com...
: >>
: >>> Don't lump the fat kids in with the blind kids, Riain. That is =
unfair
: >>> to blind kids. Fat kids deserve to get ridiculed.
: >>
: >>There's that compassionate conservatism again.
: >
: >Homosexuals would rather hear a young fat boy fart that hear a pretty
: >woman sing.
: >
: Barbra Streisand used to be a pretty woman before she got old and
: ugly, and the faggots like to hear her sing.
:=20
: Charlie
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Riain" |
|
| Title: Re: Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says |
09 Feb 2005 05:17:16 AM |
|
|
You would rather eat ***** then learn the truth about anything.
<wbt@privacy.net> wrote in message =
news:bjcj015m9q936v6ti6dqqu85gtoeesqcn6@4ax.com...
: On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 22:12:12 -0800, "Jeff Welch" <prouddem@hotmail.com>
: wrote:
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Riain" |
|
| Title: Re: Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says |
09 Feb 2005 05:16:31 AM |
|
|
Yes, the republicans have officially ruined this nation. So much so that =
I am now beginning to doubt that it can be saved from the destruction =
that they have initiated with their ignorant bigotry and fascist ways.=20
"Jeff Welch" <prouddem@hotmail.com> wrote in message =
news:1107929532.6a24596e7c20e1ec73b1c3d9d50ea4c9@meganetnews2...
:=20
: "Charlie Wilkes" <charliewilkes@news.easynews.com> wrote in message=20
: news:lPKCClmxk0kN092yn@news.easynews.com...
:=20
: > Don't lump the fat kids in with the blind kids, Riain. That is =
unfair
: > to blind kids. Fat kids deserve to get ridiculed.
:=20
: There's that compassionate conservatism again.
:=20
: -Jeff=20
:=20
:
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Riain" |
|
| Title: Re: Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says |
09 Feb 2005 05:12:56 AM |
|
|
Says the immature 10-year-old...
"Charlie Wilkes" <charliewilkes@news.easynews.com> wrote in message =
news:lPKCClmxk0kN092yn@news.easynews.com...
: Don't lump the fat kids in with the blind kids, Riain. That is unfair =
: to blind kids. Fat kids deserve to get ridiculed.
:=20
: Charlie
:=20
:
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "J Young" |
|
| Title: Re: Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says |
09 Feb 2005 12:12:04 AM |
|
|
Riain wrote:
You mean like black children were ridiculed by whites, like Jewish
children were ridiculed by Christians, like fat children are ridiculed,
like deaf children are ridiculed, like blind children are ridiculed,
and like poor children are ridiculed?
Sadly to say, in each of the examples you cited, the child has been
ridiculed for what THEY are. With homo parents, the child will become
an object of scorn amongst their peers because of who their parents
are. Gays always say that they were born that way and we should accept
them for what they are. Fine. Now gays should accept that they weren't
born to be parents. Acceptance is a two way street.
.
|
|
|
| User: "thomas p" |
|
| Title: Re: Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says |
09 Feb 2005 12:52:43 AM |
|
|
On 8 Feb 2005 22:12:04 -0800, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Riain wrote:
You mean like black children were ridiculed by whites, like Jewish
children were ridiculed by Christians, like fat children are ridiculed,
like deaf children are ridiculed, like blind children are ridiculed,
and like poor children are ridiculed?
Sadly to say, in each of the examples you cited, the child has been
ridiculed for what THEY are. With homo parents, the child will become
an object of scorn amongst their peers because of who their parents
are. Gays always say that they were born that way and we should accept
them for what they are. Fine. Now gays should accept that they weren't
born to be parents. Acceptance is a two way street.
Are sterile people born to be parents?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jos Flachs" |
|
| Title: Re: Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says |
09 Feb 2005 09:28:03 PM |
|
|
On 8 Feb 2005 22:12:04 -0800, "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Riain wrote:
You mean like black children were ridiculed by whites, like Jewish
children were ridiculed by Christians, like fat children are ridiculed,
like deaf children are ridiculed, like blind children are ridiculed,
and like poor children are ridiculed?
Sadly to say, in each of the examples you cited, the child has been
ridiculed for what THEY are. With homo parents, the child will become
an object of scorn amongst their peers because of who their parents
are. Gays always say that they were born that way and we should accept
them for what they are. Fine. Now gays should accept that they weren't
born to be parents. Acceptance is a two way street.
Quite so! Much better to have kids abused by 'normal' straight
parents.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Riain" |
|
| Title: Re: Barring Gays From Adopting Not Homophobic Lawmaker Says |
09 Feb 2005 05:14:53 AM |
|
|
WRONG IDIOT.=20
Children also make fun of parents who are blind, deaf, disabled, or =
different in anyway!!!
Are you really this stupid? Don't answer, we know that you are.=20
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message =
news:1107929524.615737.243470@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
:=20
: Sadly to say, in each of the examples you cited, the child has been
: ridiculed for what THEY are. With homo parents, the child will become
: an object of scorn amongst their peers because of who their parents
: are. Gays always say that they were born that way and we should accept
: them for what they are. Fine. Now gays should accept that they weren't
: born to be parents. Acceptance is a two way street.
:
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
