GoDrex wrote:

"neo" <MATREEX@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1180185148.112138.34180@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...

Theists 'believe' in existence of good God and follow some kind of
religion. Theists hate each others religion and are responsible for
millions of deaths.

I asked following question to atheists.

Late us compare spacies existing billion year ago without sense of
light, sound with born blind, born deaf person who even never heard
(or read) about light and sound.

Why this born blind person will try to sense light at all if he don't
even know that it does exist and it can be used for seeing objects?

Also why born deaf person will try to sense vibration of air molecules
if he don't even know that it does exist and can be used for hearing?

Same thing applies to spacies existing billion year ago.

Atheists went dead silent on this question. Obviously
atheists 'believe' in non-existence of God or creator without proof.
This attitude leads to jungle law in which 'survival of fittest'
rules. Communists were also atheists but still voilence and terror
ruled communist states. Also atheism leads to uncivilized society of
morally corrupt thiefs, frauds and gays-lesbians.

Theist and atheists both are racists, patriotic which divide mankind
and spread hatred among each others which ultimately leads to civil
war, war between nations and hence millions of deaths.

neoists are not theist, atheist, racist and patriotic. But at the same
time neoists do not hate theist, atheist, racist, patriotic people.

neoists does not 'believe' in existence or non-existence of God.
neoists do not jump to conclusion without proof, proof that can be
verified by all mankind. neoists try to find how the universe works
and what is the cause of its existence. neoist's code of conduct is
based only on one natural law i.e don't do anything to others which
you don't want to happen with yourself and to decide what is right,
neoists consider majority of common will of all mankind.

there might be medications that can help you

.
So you are doctor?

High density lipid - 43.
Low density lipid - 134.
Blood sugar: fasting - 85, post lunch - 129.

S. Triglycerides - 105.
S. Creatinine - 0.9.
Uric acid - 4.4.
S. Proteins - 7.6 (albumin - 4.3, globulin - 3.3, AG ratio - 1.3).
S. Bilirubin: direct - 0.2, indirect - 0.3, total - 0.5.
SGOT (AST) - 28.
SGPT (ALT) - 24.
S. Alkaline phosphatase - 108.
S. Electrolytes: sodium - 143, potassium - 4.4, chloride - 99.
Elisa for HIV: HIV1 + 2 - negative.

.HAEMOGRAM.

Red blood cell count - 4.46.
Haemoglobin - 14.1.
Hematocrit - 42.9.
Mean corpuscular volume - 96.2.
Mean corpuscular Hb - 31.6.
Mean corpuscular Hb concentration - 32.9.
White blood cell count - 7500/cmm.
Neutrophils - 65, Lymphocytes - 30, Eosinophils - 03, Monocytes - 02.
Platelets - 391000/cmm.
Erythrocytes sedimentation rate - 03mm.
(method - wintorbe's).

Routine Urine Analysis.
Colour - paleyellow, Transparency - clear.
Protein - Absent, Bile Salt - Absent, Red blood cells - Absent,
Crystals - Absent, Casts - Absent, sediments - absent, reaction -
alkaline, sugar - absent, bile pigments - absent, epithelial cells -
absent, pus cells - absent, deposits - absent.
Bacterias - absent.

Christopher A. Lee wrote:

You've been told that even the simplest light receptor gives an
advantage over none at all, when everything else has none.

Running around trees again. How does receptor 'know' that light does
exist and how does receptor 'know' that sensing light would give
advantage for survival?

Christopher A. Lee wrote:

On 26 May 2007 06:12:28 -0700, neo <MATR...@gmail.com> wrote:

Theists 'believe' in existence of good God and follow some kind of
religion. Theists hate each others religion and are responsible for
millions of deaths.

I asked following question to atheists.

Late us compare spacies existing billion year ago without sense of
light, sound with born blind, born deaf person who even never heard
(or read) about light and sound.

Why this born blind person will try to sense light at all if he don't
even know that it does exist and it can be used for seeing objects?

Also why born deaf person will try to sense vibration of air molecules
if he don't even know that it does exist and can be used for hearing?

Same thing applies to spacies existing billion year ago.

Atheists went dead silent on this question.

It's nothing to do with atheism, lying moron.

And you're lying about its not being answered.

You've been told that even the simplest light receptor gives an
advantage over none at all, when everything else has none.

Running around trees again. How does receptor 'know' that light does
exist and how does receptor 'know' that sensing light would give
advantage for survival?

-snip-

What does not believing in pixies make you do?

Why can't be pixie = center of gravity? Has some physicist ever seen
center of gravity? It is purely fictional, like lucid dreams, but it
still does exist.

And why can't be virtual photons = pixies? Has some physicist ever
proved existence of 'virtual' photons?

What does not 'believing' in 'virtual' photons makes you do?

I mean if you compare pixie with god, do you have enough rational to
compare virtual photons with god?

If not, aren't you follower of quantum mechanics religion?

There are pixies in physics too. But still millions of brilliant
physicists, professors, students 'believe' it.

Christopher A. Lee wrote:

On 26 May 2007 06:12:28 -0700, neo <MATREEX@gmail.com> wrote:

Theists 'believe' in existence of good God and follow some kind of
religion. Theists hate each others religion and are responsible for
millions of deaths.

I asked following question to atheists.

Late us compare spacies existing billion year ago without sense of
light, sound with born blind, born deaf person who even never heard
(or read) about light and sound.

Why this born blind person will try to sense light at all if he don't
even know that it does exist and it can be used for seeing objects?

Also why born deaf person will try to sense vibration of air molecules
if he don't even know that it does exist and can be used for hearing?

Same thing applies to spacies existing billion year ago.

Atheists went dead silent on this question.

It's nothing to do with atheism, lying moron.

And you're lying about its not being answered.

You've been told that even the simplest light receptor gives an
advantage over none at all, when everything else has none.

Running around trees again. How does receptor 'know' that light does
exist and how does receptor 'know' that sensing light would give
advantage for survival?

-snip-

What does not believing in pixies make you do?

Why can't be pixie = center of gravity? Has some physicist ever seen
center of gravity? It is purely fictional, like lucid dreams, but it
still does exist.

And why can't be virtual photons = pixies? Has some physicist ever
proved existence of 'virtual' photons?

What does not 'believing' in 'virtual' photons makes you do?

I mean if you compare pixie with god, do you have enough rational to
compare virtual photons with god?

If not, aren't you follower of quantum mechanics religion?

There are pixies in physics too. But still millions of brilliant
physicists, professors, students 'believe' it.