| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"JTEM" |
| Date: |
10 Apr 2005 08:53:38 AM |
| Object: |
Beats any troll |
Sometimes I -- and others -- try to mock the lunatic
right, a practice akin to trying to splash the
Atlantic ocean. To demonstrate this fact, please
read the words of one Kay Daly, the latest mare
in the GOP stable of "Independent" citizens in
control of an RNC front group.
You can't make this stuff up...
<Quote>
My job is stand in the breach between the left
and the president's judicial nominations . . .
You know who they are. You've seen them.
The pro-abortion fanatics and the radical
feminists, the atheists who file lawsuits
attacking the pledge of allegiance and the
ten commandments, the environmentalist
tree-hugging animal-rights extremists, the
one-world globalists who worship at the
altar of the United Nations and
international law, the militant homosexuals
and the anti-military hippie pieceniks, the
racial agitators who believe we are all
created equal but some are a little more
equal than others, the union bosses and the
socialists posing as journalists and college
professors, the government bureaucrats
and the tax-and-spend junkies, the
Hollywood elitists, the air-headed actors
and singers who think that we actually
care what they think, the pornographers
who fund the leftists and who won't be
happy until every Bible in every child's
hands is replaced with the latest copy of
Hustler magazine, and of course the
gun-grabbing trial lawyers and their
willing accomplices in the United States
Senate who won't be happy until they
disarm every last citizen down to the
last bee bee and paintball gun.
<Unquote>
.
|
|
| User: "Ike" |
|
| Title: Re: Beats any troll |
10 Apr 2005 12:20:50 PM |
|
|
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:F9idndD3acd4sMTfRVn-jA@comcast.com...
Sometimes I -- and others -- try to mock the lunatic
right, a practice akin to trying to splash the
Atlantic ocean. To demonstrate this fact, please
read the words of one Kay Daly, the latest mare
in the GOP stable of "Independent" citizens in
control of an RNC front group.
You can't make this stuff up...
<Quote>
My job is stand in the breach between the left
and the president's judicial nominations . . .
You know who they are. You've seen them.
The pro-abortion fanatics and the radical
feminists, the atheists who file lawsuits
attacking the pledge of allegiance and the
ten commandments, the environmentalist
tree-hugging animal-rights extremists, the
one-world globalists who worship at the
altar of the United Nations and
international law, the militant homosexuals
and the anti-military hippie pieceniks, the
racial agitators who believe we are all
created equal but some are a little more
equal than others, the union bosses and the
socialists posing as journalists and college
professors, the government bureaucrats
and the tax-and-spend junkies, the
Hollywood elitists, the air-headed actors
and singers who think that we actually
care what they think, the pornographers
who fund the leftists and who won't be
happy until every Bible in every child's
hands is replaced with the latest copy of
Hustler magazine, and of course the
gun-grabbing trial lawyers and their
willing accomplices in the United States
Senate who won't be happy until they
disarm every last citizen down to the
last bee bee and paintball gun.
<Unquote>
You're correct. Who would have thought up pieceniks. Are they Balkanatics?
Union bosses posing a college professors is another good one. I thought the
pornographers and drug dealers were funding the prohibitionists, or just be
be on the safe side, funding everyone. Also why should our kids be forced to
read old copies of Hustler, just because they live in poverty and cn't
afford to buy it off the newstand, instead having to rummage through trash
cans? Thank the lords that the trial lawyers haven't taken all the guns yet!
I would have nothing to shoot bees with.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Beats any troll |
14 Apr 2005 09:00:48 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 09:53:38 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Sometimes I -- and others -- try to mock the lunatic
right, a practice akin to trying to splash the
Atlantic ocean. To demonstrate this fact, please
read the words of one Kay Daly, the latest mare
in the GOP stable of "Independent" citizens in
control of an RNC front group.
You can't make this stuff up...
<Quote>
My job is stand in the breach between the left
and the president's judicial nominations . . .
You know who they are. You've seen them.
The pro-abortion fanatics and the radical
feminists, the atheists who file lawsuits
attacking the pledge of allegiance and the
ten commandments, the environmentalist
tree-hugging animal-rights extremists, the
one-world globalists who worship at the
altar of the United Nations and
international law, the militant homosexuals
and the anti-military hippie pieceniks, the
racial agitators who believe we are all
created equal but some are a little more
equal than others, the union bosses and the
socialists posing as journalists and college
professors, the government bureaucrats
and the tax-and-spend junkies, the
Hollywood elitists, the air-headed actors
and singers who think that we actually
care what they think, the pornographers
who fund the leftists and who won't be
happy until every Bible in every child's
hands is replaced with the latest copy of
Hustler magazine, and of course the
gun-grabbing trial lawyers and their
willing accomplices in the United States
Senate who won't be happy until they
disarm every last citizen down to the
last bee bee and paintball gun.
<Unquote>
Joseph Goebbel's *Lives.*
I pity these poor moronic fuckwits fouling themselves in mindless
gibbering terror at everything in sight.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Beats any troll |
14 Apr 2005 09:25:02 AM |
|
|
"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote
Joseph Goebbel's *Lives.*
What gets me is that even supposedly "liberal"
people, like Bill Maher, can't bring themselves
to condemn this stuff without pretending that
the other side is "Doing it too."
What could compare to these right-wing rants?
Baghdad Bob, maybe, but is there anything
outside of a dictatorship that can rival the
propaganda coming out of America's MAJORITY
political party?
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Beats any troll |
14 Apr 2005 02:53:38 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:25:02 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
wrote:
"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote
Joseph Goebbel's *Lives.*
What gets me is that even supposedly "liberal"
people, like Bill Maher, can't bring themselves
to condemn this stuff without pretending that
the other side is "Doing it too."
What could compare to these right-wing rants?
Baghdad Bob, maybe, but is there anything
outside of a dictatorship that can rival the
propaganda coming out of America's MAJORITY
political party?
IMO, dictatorships are so outclassed on this topic they're not even
past the 'starting line.'
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Beats any troll |
10 Apr 2005 09:29:25 AM |
|
|
Pardon the self-followup, but I wanted to add a
few comments here...
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote
Sometimes I -- and others -- try to mock the lunatic
right, a practice akin to trying to splash the
Atlantic ocean. To demonstrate this fact, please
read the words of one Kay Daly, the latest mare
in the GOP stable of "Independent" citizens in
control of an RNC front group.
You can't make this stuff up...
<Quote>
My job is stand in the breach between the left
and the president's judicial nominations . . .
Number of Bill Clinton's judicial nominees blocked
by the Republicans: 64.
Number of Dubya's judicial nominees blocked by
the Democrats: 10.
You know who they are. You've seen them.
The pro-abortion fanatics and the radical
feminists,
Wait a minute. If these people are "fanatics" and "radicals,"
what does that make the other side -- your side -- with your
bombings at clinics & assasinations of doctors?
"Psychotic" seems appropriate.
the atheists who file lawsuits attacking the
pledge of allegiance and the ten
commandments,
"The" Ten Commandments is wrong. There isn't just one
version. In fact, there are at least three different versions.
The version in question is the Protestant-only version, not
the one found in the Catholic bible or Jewish Tora.
And they're not attacking the Ten Commandments, they're
attacking the use of public property for purely Protestant
religious reasons.
And it's not limited to atheists, as Catholics, Jews & even
orthodox Christians are having their rights squashed as
well, with the purely Protestant version of the Ten
Commandments being elevated above all others.
As far as the pledge goes, it wasn't the atheists who
ALTERED it. That was self-described "Christians."
And if your kind really believe your own arguments,
and your inclusion of "under God" isn't a prayer, then
lets be fair about it & rotate. Every second week your
kids can pledge allegence "under Allah," and every
third week "under Buddha." Let's save the fourth week
for the Satanist. I mean, according to you, it really
doesn't matter. So, we might as well give all the
other figures a rest, and let the Satanists have their
go at it.
the environmentalist tree-hugging animal-rights
extremists,
So you're saying that Bush is immoral, that he's a
liar. After all, doesn't he claim to be pro-environment?
What about his "Clear Skies" initiative?
the one-world globalists who worship at the
altar of the United Nations
Bush's dad, as President, proclaimed the "New World
Order."
Bush claimed that he was going to war in Iraq in
support of the U.N.
the militant homosexuals and the anti-military
hippie pieceniks,
Bush is a draft-dodger-turned-deserter who paid people
to smear a decorated war veterans.
No, not *Just* John Kerry.
Bush also smeared John McCain & Max Cleland, a
man who "only" lost three limbs in active service
to his nation.
I can't think of anything more "anti-military" than that.
the racial agitators who believe we are all
created equal but some are a little more
equal than others,
Bush is against affirmative action, though he himself
got into school on an affirmative action program which
he supports.
He also claims his "victory" in Florida because of
a little scam where 50,000 black people were
denied their right to vote.
the union bosses and the socialists posing as
journalists and college professors,
You know, the "Liberal media elite" stopped being
funny even before Bush stole office, when the media
launched attack after attakc on Clinton. Now the
media can't even be bothered to report on treason
and corruption in the Bush administration.
the government bureaucrats
All three branches of the government are in control
of the Republicans, the so-called "conservatives."
and the tax-and-spend junkies,
Spending has exploded under Bush, and he took us
from the largest budget surplus in American history
to the largest deficits in our history.
the Hollywood elitists, the air-headed actors
and singers who think that we actually
care what they think,
Arnold Schwarzenegger, actor.
Ronald Reagan, actor.
Fred Dalton Thomas, actor.
Sonny Bono, actor & singer.
Fred Grandy, actor (Gopher on "The Love Boat").
Shirley Temple, actor.
Now how many Democratic "Hollywood movie
stars" can you name?
the pornographers who fund the leftists and who
won't be happy until every Bible in every child's
hands is replaced with the latest copy of
Hustler magazine,
Actually, it was the Bush administration that
tossed out the rules so that a pornographer
(and gay male prostitute) could get into the
Whitehouse on fake journalism credentials.
and of course the gun-grabbing trial lawyers
Lawyers don't make gun laws. You do know that,
right?
If you have a problem with our gun laws -- and
you certainly imply that you do -- you need to
look at the Republicans. They control all three
branches of the government right now.
and their willing accomplices in the United States
Senate who won't be happy until they
disarm every last citizen down to the
last bee bee and paintball gun.
The Senate has been under Republican control
for more than 9 out of the last 10 years. If you
don't like what the Senate is doing, you don't
like the Republicans.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark" |
|
| Title: Re: Beats any troll |
10 Apr 2005 10:15:44 AM |
|
|
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in news:0PSdnafZS8TVq8TfRVn-
qw@comcast.com:
Pardon the self-followup, but I wanted to add a
few comments here...
<Quote>
My job is stand in the breach between the left
and the president's judicial nominations . . .
Number of Bill Clinton's judicial nominees blocked
by the Republicans: 64.
Number of Dubya's judicial nominees blocked by
the Democrats: 10.
do you have a good source for this -- reputable web link, book,
'scholarly article', or some such? my memory tells me you're
right on the money about this...but the time line and the exact
numbers are a mystery to me.
--
Mark
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Beats any troll |
10 Apr 2005 01:15:18 PM |
|
|
"Mark" <mark@no.answer.net> wrote
Number of Bill Clinton's judicial nominees blocked
by the Republicans: 64.
Number of Dubya's judicial nominees blocked by
the Democrats: 10.
do you have a good source for this -- reputable web link,
book, 'scholarly article', or some such?
Here. You decide if you want to believe them.
Interestingly enough, I was reading a lunatic right wing
site on this very subject, and even they couldn't compare
Dubya to Clinton's troubles with nominees.
They brought up Clinton, sure, but they cherry picked
numbers to hide the facts. That is to say, the current
issues with getting nominees through the Senate began
in January of 1995, when the Republicans took control
of both houses of congress. Neither Bush senior nor
Ronald Reagan faced these issues.
Oh: And compared to Clinton, Bush has it easy.
http://democrats.senate.gov/~dpc/pubs/107-2-285.html
http://mediamatters.org/items/200502180004
http://andifeelfine.blogspot.com/2005/03/fun-facts-number-of-clintons-judici
al.html
http://www.constitutioncenter.org/education/TeachingwithCurrentEvents/Consti
tutionNewswire/13952.shtml
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Vaughan" |
|
| Title: Re: Beats any troll |
10 Apr 2005 02:42:58 PM |
|
|
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:W5WdnXs40Imn9sTfRVn-rA@comcast.com:
"Mark" <mark@no.answer.net> wrote
Number of Bill Clinton's judicial nominees blocked
by the Republicans: 64.
Number of Dubya's judicial nominees blocked by
the Democrats: 10.
do you have a good source for this -- reputable web link,
book, 'scholarly article', or some such?
[ ... ]
http://democrats.senate.gov/~dpc/pubs/107-2-285.html
http://mediamatters.org/items/200502180004
http://andifeelfine.blogspot.com/2005/03/fun-facts-number-of-clintons
-judicial.html
http://www.constitutioncenter.org/education/TeachingwithCurrentEvents
/ConstitutionNewswire/13952.shtml
thanks for the links
--
Mark
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Beats any troll |
10 Apr 2005 11:08:49 AM |
|
|
Mark <mark@no.answer.net> wrote in
news:Xns9634729AC7B7Emarkisnotavailable@68.1.17.6:
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in news:0PSdnafZS8TVq8TfRVn-
qw@comcast.com:
Pardon the self-followup, but I wanted to add a
few comments here...
<Quote>
My job is stand in the breach between the left
and the president's judicial nominations . . .
Number of Bill Clinton's judicial nominees blocked
by the Republicans: 64.
Number of Clinton nominees given up-or-down votes in the Senate:
ALL OF THEM
Number of Dubya's judicial nominees blocked by
the Democrats: 10.
Number of Bush nominees denied up-or-down votes in the Senate: 10.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"You know you're over the target when you start receiving flak."
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Beats any troll |
10 Apr 2005 01:19:41 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
Number of Bush nominees denied up-or-down
votes in the Senate: 10.
I was a bit hasty in my first response. You see,
Bush could get another ten nominees denied
not only a vote in the Senate, but in the Judiciary
Committee, and he'd still be ahead of Bill
Clinton. He'd still have no reason to whine like
a little girl about the Democrats.
Get it, ***** boy? It's not that the Democrats
have been tough on Bush, it's that they still
have a long ways to go before paying back
the Republicans for what they did to Clinton.
***** you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Beats any troll |
14 Apr 2005 09:04:03 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 14:19:41 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
wrote:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
Number of Bush nominees denied up-or-down
votes in the Senate: 10.
I was a bit hasty in my first response. You see,
Bush could get another ten nominees denied
not only a vote in the Senate, but in the Judiciary
Committee, and he'd still be ahead of Bill
Clinton. He'd still have no reason to whine like
a little girl about the Democrats.
Get it, ***** boy? It's not that the Democrats
have been tough on Bush, it's that they still
have a long ways to go before paying back
the Republicans for what they did to Clinton.
***** you.
Now you got Freddy all excited.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Beats any troll |
10 Apr 2005 01:01:32 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
Number of Bush nominees denied up-or-down votes
in the Senate: 10.
Um, "Fred," you're not exactly honest here. In fact, you're
your usual chicken ***** self.
One of the blocked judges was appointed to the bench
anyway, while the congress was out of session.
Seven of the ten have been re-introduced.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
