"Bella" The Non-Hollywood Pro-Life Movie Is Coming



 Religions > Atheism > "Bella" The Non-Hollywood Pro-Life Movie Is Coming

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Sound of Trumpet"
Date: 02 Dec 2006 05:31:32 AM
Object: "Bella" The Non-Hollywood Pro-Life Movie Is Coming
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1747104/posts
"Bella" the non-Hollywood movie is coming
http://www.townhall.com ^ | 12-1-2006 | Robert D. Novak
Posted on 12/01/2006 12:21:40 PM PST by spintreebob
An invited audience including Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez
gathered at the National Geographic Society's auditorium in Washington
Monday night for a screening of "Bella," an independently produced
feature film. No mere movie, it offers hope for the beleaguered
anti-abortion movement to reverse the political tide running against
it.
This was the eighth such screening in Washington. Monday night's
audience reflected the reaction in more than 100 showings nationwide:
an emotional experience for a stunning exhibition of cinema art that
unexpectedly won a Toronto Film Festival award. It is no propaganda
film but a dramatic depiction of choices facing an unmarried pregnant
woman.
"Bella," unknown to the general public, has generated excitement and
anticipation in conservative Catholic and other anti-abortion circles.
The problem is getting the film in movie theaters around the country
for its public premiere early next April. That is never easy for an
independent film with no box office names, but the problems are
magnified when its message runs counter to the social mores of
Hollywood.
"Bella" arrives in an environment that has grown bleak for enemies of
abortion. The Democratic Party has become so much the party of abortion
rights that of 41 freshmen Democrats elected to the House, only three
are anti- abortion. Pro-life forces in the House suffered a net loss of
13 members. That means statutory restrictions on abortion, which must
be renewed by each Congress, are now in serious jeopardy.
The loss of numerical strength on Capitol Hill reflects a public
relations and political victory by the abtion lobby. Republican
politicians tend to give only lip service to the issue, typified by
President George W. Bush's silence on abortion. Republican candidates
have accepte support from pro-life forces -- and then kept quiet about
abortion, leaving the field open to pro-choice advocates.
Thus, the anti-abortion movement sees "Bella" as providential. It is
entertainment, not propaganda. Although Monday's screening was
sponsored by the National Council for Adoption, the word "adoption" is
uttered only once in the film. There are no tirades against abortion.
Indeed, it acknowledges a woman's pain of carrying a baby to term only
to give it up for adoption. In the end, however, the film is a
heart-wrenching affirmation of life over death.
"Bella" was conceived by three young Mexican men -- producer, director
and lead actor -- who are conservative Catholics and want to make
movies removed from Hollywood's movie culture of sex and violence.
Bankrolled by a wealthy Catholic family from Philadelphia, they shot
the film in 24 days in New York City.
The star is Eduardo Verastegui, a Mexican heartthrob as a lead
performer in TV soap operas who now lives in Los Angeles. A devout
Catholic, he told me he was tired of movies showing Latinos as
disreputable and immoral. He has learned to speak English in three
years well enough to play the lead role mostly in English (with
subtitles over the Spanish).
.

User: "Free Lunch"

Title: Re: "Bella" The Non-Hollywood Pro-Life Movie Is Coming 02 Dec 2006 10:22:37 AM
On 2 Dec 2006 03:31:32 -0800, in alt.atheism
"Sound of Trumpet" <sound_of_trumpet@myway.com> wrote in
<1165059092.373387.303000@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1747104/posts

"Bella" the non-Hollywood movie is coming

http://www.townhall.com ^ | 12-1-2006 | Robert D. Novak

Posted on 12/01/2006 12:21:40 PM PST by spintreebob

An invited audience including Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez
gathered at the National Geographic Society's auditorium in Washington
Monday night for a screening of "Bella," an independently produced
feature film. No mere movie, it offers hope for the beleaguered
anti-abortion movement to reverse the political tide running against
it.

This was the eighth such screening in Washington. Monday night's
audience reflected the reaction in more than 100 showings nationwide:
an emotional experience for a stunning exhibition of cinema art that
unexpectedly won a Toronto Film Festival award. It is no propaganda
film but a dramatic depiction of choices facing an unmarried pregnant
woman.

"Bella," unknown to the general public, has generated excitement and
anticipation in conservative Catholic and other anti-abortion circles.
The problem is getting the film in movie theaters around the country
for its public premiere early next April. That is never easy for an
independent film with no box office names, but the problems are
magnified when its message runs counter to the social mores of
Hollywood.

It sure is nice to see the completely out-of-touch bishops telling other
people how to run their lives when they are doing such a good job of
destroying the finances of the Catholic Church.

"Bella" arrives in an environment that has grown bleak for enemies of
abortion. The Democratic Party has become so much the party of abortion
rights that of 41 freshmen Democrats elected to the House, only three
are anti- abortion. Pro-life forces in the House suffered a net loss of
13 members. That means statutory restrictions on abortion, which must
be renewed by each Congress, are now in serious jeopardy.

Big deal.

The loss of numerical strength on Capitol Hill reflects a public
relations and political victory by the abtion lobby. Republican
politicians tend to give only lip service to the issue, typified by
President George W. Bush's silence on abortion. Republican candidates
have accepte support from pro-life forces -- and then kept quiet about
abortion, leaving the field open to pro-choice advocates.

The vast majority of Americans are willing to tolerate abortion in
appropriate circumstances. The radical anti-abortion fringe with its
refusal to compromise its losing position is the group that makes
certain that nothing useful gets done.

Thus, the anti-abortion movement sees "Bella" as providential. It is
entertainment, not propaganda. Although Monday's screening was
sponsored by the National Council for Adoption, the word "adoption" is
uttered only once in the film. There are no tirades against abortion.
Indeed, it acknowledges a woman's pain of carrying a baby to term only
to give it up for adoption. In the end, however, the film is a
heart-wrenching affirmation of life over death.

Fine. Adoption can be a good choice, but there are plenty of children
who are not being adopted.

"Bella" was conceived by three young Mexican men -- producer, director
and lead actor -- who are conservative Catholics and want to make
movies removed from Hollywood's movie culture of sex and violence.
Bankrolled by a wealthy Catholic family from Philadelphia, they shot
the film in 24 days in New York City.

The star is Eduardo Verastegui, a Mexican heartthrob as a lead
performer in TV soap operas who now lives in Los Angeles. A devout
Catholic, he told me he was tired of movies showing Latinos as
disreputable and immoral. He has learned to speak English in three
years well enough to play the lead role mostly in English (with
subtitles over the Spanish).

.

User: "Spartakus"

Title: Re: "Bella" The Non-Hollywood Pro-Life Movie Is Coming 02 Dec 2006 10:17:14 AM
Sound of Trumpet wrote:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1747104/posts

"Bella" the non-Hollywood movie is coming

http://www.townhall.com ^ | 12-1-2006 | Robert D. Novak

The trailer sucks. It focuses almost completely on the man, not the
woman. If that's an accurate indication of the movie's content, the
movie could be subtitled:
"Woman? What woman?"
.
User: "David Johnston"

Title: Re: "Bella" The Non-Hollywood Pro-Life Movie Is Coming 02 Dec 2006 03:03:07 PM
On 2 Dec 2006 08:17:14 -0800, "Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com>
wrote:

Sound of Trumpet wrote:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1747104/posts

"Bella" the non-Hollywood movie is coming

http://www.townhall.com ^ | 12-1-2006 | Robert D. Novak


The trailer sucks. It focuses almost completely on the man, not the
woman.

That's probably accurate. The Novak column on the subject doesn't
even mention the actress. It only talks about the "star" of the
movie, the male lead actor. So I'm thinking the character actually
carrying the child is not very important.
.
User: "Mike Painter"

Title: Re: "Bella" The Non-Hollywood Pro-Life Movie Is Coming 02 Dec 2006 06:22:05 PM
David Johnston wrote:

On 2 Dec 2006 08:17:14 -0800, "Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com>
wrote:

Sound of Trumpet wrote:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1747104/posts

"Bella" the non-Hollywood movie is coming

http://www.townhall.com ^ | 12-1-2006 | Robert D. Novak


The trailer sucks. It focuses almost completely on the man, not the
woman.


That's probably accurate. The Novak column on the subject doesn't
even mention the actress. It only talks about the "star" of the
movie, the male lead actor. So I'm thinking the character actually
carrying the child is not very important.

Of course the man is the more important.
Darn pinko commie liberal fascist socialist, this is a christain movie and
they don't make stars out of property.
.

User: "satyr"

Title: Re: "Bella" The Non-Hollywood Pro-Life Movie Is Coming 03 Dec 2006 12:14:03 AM
On Sat, 02 Dec 2006 21:03:07 GMT, David Johnston <rgorman@block.net>
wrote:

On 2 Dec 2006 08:17:14 -0800, "Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com>
wrote:

Sound of Trumpet wrote:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1747104/posts

"Bella" the non-Hollywood movie is coming

http://www.townhall.com ^ | 12-1-2006 | Robert D. Novak


The trailer sucks. It focuses almost completely on the man, not the
woman.


That's probably accurate. The Novak column on the subject doesn't
even mention the actress. It only talks about the "star" of the
movie, the male lead actor. So I'm thinking the character actually
carrying the child is not very important.

Of course she is important. The star would look pretty silly smacking
around the air.
--
satyr #1953
Chairman, EAC Church Taxation Subcommittee
Director, Gideon Bible Alternative Fuel Project
Supervisor, EAC Fossil Casting Lab
.


User: "satyr"

Title: Re: "Bella" The Non-Hollywood Pro-Life Movie Is Coming 03 Dec 2006 12:10:40 AM
On 2 Dec 2006 08:17:14 -0800, "Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com>
wrote:

Sound of Trumpet wrote:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1747104/posts

"Bella" the non-Hollywood movie is coming

http://www.townhall.com ^ | 12-1-2006 | Robert D. Novak


The trailer sucks. It focuses almost completely on the man, not the
woman. If that's an accurate indication of the movie's content, the
movie could be subtitled:

"Woman? What woman?"

You may have missed this part:
"Bella" was conceived by three young Mexican men -- producer, director
and lead actor -- who are conservative Catholics...
Who better to understand and convey the pain of an unwanted pregnancy?
--
satyr #1953
Chairman, EAC Church Taxation Subcommittee
Director, Gideon Bible Alternative Fuel Project
Supervisor, EAC Fossil Casting Lab
.
User: "Free Lunch"

Title: Re: "Bella" The Non-Hollywood Pro-Life Movie Is Coming 03 Dec 2006 12:14:17 AM
On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 06:10:40 GMT, in alt.atheism
satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org> wrote in
<hdq4n21te6ot79jgutjr1mcb51q46aplbo@4ax.com>:

On 2 Dec 2006 08:17:14 -0800, "Spartakus" <spartakus@my-deja.com>
wrote:

Sound of Trumpet wrote:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1747104/posts

"Bella" the non-Hollywood movie is coming

http://www.townhall.com ^ | 12-1-2006 | Robert D. Novak


The trailer sucks. It focuses almost completely on the man, not the
woman. If that's an accurate indication of the movie's content, the
movie could be subtitled:

"Woman? What woman?"


You may have missed this part:

"Bella" was conceived by three young Mexican men -- producer, director
and lead actor -- who are conservative Catholics...

Who better to understand and convey the pain of an unwanted pregnancy?

Oh, I don't know, maybe a woman stuck in a male-dominated society
controlled by a religion full of men who never get married?
.


User: "Lord Calvert"

Title: Re: "Bella" The Non-Hollywood Pro-Life Movie Is Coming 02 Dec 2006 11:36:31 AM
Spartakus wrote:

Sound of Trumpet wrote:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1747104/posts

"Bella" the non-Hollywood movie is coming

http://www.townhall.com ^ | 12-1-2006 | Robert D. Novak


The trailer sucks. It focuses almost completely on the man, not the
woman. If that's an accurate indication of the movie's content, the
movie could be subtitled:

"Woman? What woman?"

You mean it is not a remake of the 1980 porn classic "Bella" starring
Tracy Adams, Mary Stuart and Eric Edwards, which involved a middle-aged
woman, her lover and her teenage daughter in an incestuous love
triangle?
It does seem rather curious that an anti-abortion movie would use the
name of a legendary porn film, particularly one featuring adultery and
lesbian incest. One has to wonder what the underlying motive behind
that decision was.
Rich Goranson
Amherst, NY, USA
aa#MCMXCIX, a-vet#1
EAC Department of Cruel and Unusual Choreography
.
User: ""

Title: Re: "Bella" The Non-Hollywood Pro-Life Movie Is Coming 02 Dec 2006 02:33:02 PM
Lord Calvert wrote:

Spartakus wrote:

Sound of Trumpet wrote:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1747104/posts

"Bella" the non-Hollywood movie is coming

http://www.townhall.com ^ | 12-1-2006 | Robert D. Novak

The trailer sucks. It focuses almost completely on the man, not the
woman. If that's an accurate indication of the movie's content, the
movie could be subtitled:

"Woman? What woman?"

You mean it is not a remake of the 1980 porn classic "Bella" starring
Tracy Adams, Mary Stuart and Eric Edwards, which involved a middle-aged
woman, her lover and her teenage daughter in an incestuous love
triangle?

Is there something you need to tell us, or do you just hang out at
imdb.com too much? ;-)
.

User: "Al Klein"

Title: Re: "Bella" The Non-Hollywood Pro-Life Movie Is Coming 02 Dec 2006 06:44:32 PM
On 2 Dec 2006 09:36:31 -0800, "Lord Calvert" <CalvertdeGrey@msn.com>
wrote:

It does seem rather curious that an anti-abortion movie would use the
name of a legendary porn film, particularly one featuring adultery and
lesbian incest. One has to wonder what the underlying motive behind
that decision was.

Stupidity?
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your
Christ."
- Mohandas Gandhi
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.


User: ""

Title: Re: "Bella" The Non-Hollywood Pro-Life Movie Is Coming 02 Dec 2006 10:44:45 AM
seems like a boring movie to me
shadknight99u421961
Games that I like to play (or another tagline)
<a href=http://www.gamestotal.com/>Multiplayer Online Games</a> <a
href=http://www.gamestotal.com/>Strategy Games</a><br><a
href=http://uc.gamestotal.com/>Unification Wars</a> - <a
href=http://uc.gamestotal.com/>Massive Multiplayer Online
Games</a><br><a href=http://gc.gamestotal.com/>Galactic Conquest</a> -
<a href=http://gc.gamestotal.com/>Strategy Games</a><br><a
href=http://www.stephenyong.com/runescape.htm>Runescape</a><br><a
href=http://www.stephenyong.com/kingsofchaos.htm>Kings of chaos</a><br>
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER