$ BellSouth Internet Group CONFiRMs VARiABLE c of LiGHT.!!
VELOCiTY c VARiED "by the same underlying mechanism as life."
Light VELOCiTY v increases iNVERSELY as PATH particle COUNT.
brian a m stuckless
<> >><> >><> >><> >><>
jonathan wrote: > > "brian a m stuckless" <bastuck@nf.sympatico.ca>
wrote in message > news:4380AA63.362E@nf.sympatico.ca...
There are NO arbitrary fundamental physical constants of NATURE, now.
SI GUESS iSS units are meter, kilogram, second, Ampere, Kelvin & Mol.
A physical constant is a contradiction in terms. Our fundamental
constants all evolve over time. --
insert ..see top of PAGE, dipstick.!!
-- By the same underlying mechanism as life. We need to look to the
most complex the universe has to offer...life...to understand the
physical universe.
Not the other way around. Physics is plagued by a simple
frame of reference mistake. Universality is only found
in the whole, not in the parts. Evolution gives us the
answers to the fine tuning and coincidence problems
in cosmology.
A Quintessential Introduction to Dark Energy
Paul J. Steinhardt
Department of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA
FINE-TUNING, COSMIC COINCIDENCE, AND THE QUINTESSENTIAL
SOLUTION
Whatever form the dark energy takes, two new cosmological problems
arise. First, the component must have a tiny energy density today,
roughly 10^-47 GeV^4 How does this small value arise from a
microphysical theory. We will refer to the puzzle of explaining this
tiny energy as the fine-tuning problem."
A second problem arises when the cosmological model is extrapolated
back in time to the very early universe, at the end of in inflation,
say. The quintessence energy density decreases at a different rate
than the matter density, and the ratio shrinks by many orders of
magnitude as we extrapolate back in time.
The observations are telling us that, somehow, the ratio was set
initially just right so that now, fifteen billion years later, the
ratio is of order unity.
Accounting for the special ratio in the early universe will be
referred to as the coincidence problem"
http://wwwphy.princeton.edu/~steinh/steinhardt.pdf
Department of Physics
Princeton University
http://wwwphy.princeton.edu/~steinh/
...as POSTED:
There are NO arbitrary fundamental physical constants of NATURE, now.
SI GUESS iSS units are meter, kilogram, second, Ampere, Kelvin & Mol.
Re: (PLANCK mass Mp)*lp = {mph}*ls = me*wls = hbar / c = m1*rA / nA
Moo Moo*loo hbar G*Mp^2 G*M1*m1
= -- -- -- = -- - -- = ---- = --- -- = -- -- --- -- --
4*pi*Roo 4*pi c c^2 nA*(n - 1)*v1^2
G*Mp*{mph} m1*rA (h + 2*hbar) k*{e}
= -- -- -- --- -- -- -- -- = -- -- = -- --- -- -- = -- --
4*(pi)^2*nA*(n - 1)*v1^2 nA Ra*c 2*pi
m1*(wavelength wl) m1*c me*wlc Planck's h eH*loo
= -- -- --- -- -- -- = -- - -- = --- -- = -- -- -- -- = -- - --
2*pi*nL 2*pi*fL 2*pi 2*pi*c 4*pi*c^2.
Maxwell's authentic equations applied ONLY between FLAT PLATEs.!!
But that doesn't matter for a point-ONLY on a WORLD-line in GR.!!
A WORLD-point in SPACE-time has NO iNSiDE, or OUTside, ANYways.!!
The SHORTEST GR-geodesic iN the SPACE ON the SURFACE of the POiNT
ON a WORLD-line in GR SPACE-time is NOT UNCLE AL's "other, LONGER
way round" GR-geodesic. Go go Google GROUP SEARCH My BiGGER bang.
<> >><> >><> >><> >><>
Autymn D. C. wrote: > > brian a m stuckless wrote: > > Sue... wrote:
Ken S. Tucker wrote: > Hi Sue, mostly agree with you...
Sue... wrote: > > Ken S. Tucker wrote: > > > Ken S. Tucker
wrote: > > > > > > > FrediFizzx wrote: > > > > > > "Jay R. Yablon"
<jyablon@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message > > > > > > > >
news:eLScf.67167$Bv6.22934@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
Stop cascading or, if I ever find you, I'll beat your head in.
Greek YAB-a-dab-a-Sue-doo, mu*eps, in SI GUESS= Uo*Eo = 1 / c^2.
$ 3*VOLUME / AREA, per DURATiON = RADiAL velocity.!!
Delta VOLUME / surface AREA, per second = RADiAL DiSTANCE / 3*sec.
Unit TRiAKiSicosa VOLUME / (surf AREA*sec) is TiP-to-TiP / 6*sec.
Unit SPHERiCAL VOLUME / (surface AREA*sec) is, DiAMETER / 6*sec.
Unit CUBiCAL VOLUME / (surface AREA*second) = EDGEside / 6*sec.
GRAViTATiONAL impulse per VOLUME; iNERTiAL impulse, per AREA.
No, they're not. You need more subscripts. You should also read
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Word_salad_(mental_health).
The force between two charges and the force between
two masses represents no energy exchange.
Since "force" x DiSTANCE = "energy exchange" ("force" isn't "energy
exchange" EVEN if "viewed with a CAUTiON", MAY be WHY Sue said SO).
The GUESS iSS SERiAL index of OBSERVED scale-invariance, follows...
The NEW SI GUESS iSS STATiSTiCAL system of SCALE-invariance:
(h + 2*hbar) (pi + 1) (X + 2*Y)
-- -- -- -- = -- --- = -- -- -- = STATiSTiCAL *tensors* ;
h pi X
nL*(h + nA*hbar) nL*(2*pi + nA) nL*(X + nA*Y)
-- -- -- -- -- = -- -- --- -- = -- --- -- -- = nL*Ni.
h 2*pi X
Planck scale ; LOCAL scale ; Each WAY, and BEYOND.!!
So, NATURE doesn't CARE, if we have COHERENT SI STANDARDs.!!
Therefore, AS per WiTH the BOHR Atom, "AS above SO below".!!
G*{mph)*Mp 4*(pi)^2*{mph}*ls^3 2*pi*ls
-- ---- -- = -- -- -- - -- -- -- = me*(-- --- --)^2*wls .!!
(n - 1) ts^2 ts
brian a m stuckless
<> >><> >><> >><> >><>
no caution > > -Aut. Re: AS above SO below.
.
