| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Bill M" |
| Date: |
13 Sep 2006 02:40:29 PM |
| Object: |
BIBLE FALSE EVIDENCE |
People are constantly posting quotes from "The Bibles" as evidence or proof
of their god. This is not proof or evidence of anything other than hundreds
of opinions, myths, legends, fables and impossible tales were told by
hundreds of selfishly motivated people thousands of years ago. This all
occurred before man had any scientific knowledge of the Universe and a
printing press.
I keep seeing people quoting from the Bible as though it was proof or a
fact.
There is NO objective verifiable evidence that any of the Bibles are the
word of ANY God. There is no objective verifiable evidence that the stories
in the Bibles are historical fact. In fact most of the stories in the Bibles
are obviously, myths, fables and impossible nonsense.
There is NO objective evidence that the Bibles are the word of ANY God and
if they are he was truly a confused, erratic, mean and inconsistent story
teller.
There are no originals in existence. They are all hand copies and
modifications of copies of copies etc. with alterations, additions and
deletions to suite the transcribers motives. The printing press was not even
invented until the 15 Th. Century and the latest Bible copies date back
1,400 years and more before the invention of the printing press. The present
book of Bibles was assembled from numerous documents chosen by self
interested church leaders. They are not all or even most of the ancient
religious documents.
Here is a list of just the ENGLISH translations of these old and
unauthenticated Bibles. Which are the correct ones? And were the copies they
translated from accurate translations of the originals? NO originals exist.
NO ONE knows.
The evidence is that these Bibles, written and copied by over 150 men over a
period of over 2500 years are nothing but a combination of history, myths,
folklore and legends. Their content was motivated by ancient church leaders
to control their flocks.
It is very likely that these ancient documents were doctored and altered to
enhance the power of the clerics of the time. Many of these writings come
from fraud, interpolations, myths and hearsay.
There is NO objective evidence that they are accurate history or the words
of any God.
There are eighteen different English translations alone:
New American Standard
New International Version
Amplified Bible
New Living Translation
King James Version
Contemporary English Version
New King James Version
21 St. Century King James Version
New International Version
American Standard Version
Holman Christian Version
New Life Version
Darby Translation
Young's Literal Translation
New International Readers Version
World English Bible
New Revised Standard Version
The Jerusalem Bible
Religion built on the stories in the Bibles is a religion built on myths and
quick sand.
There are a plentitude of different religious documents that proclaim the
validity of various Gods. Which, if any, are correct?
Major sacred texts and documents;
Baha'i Sacrid writtings
Life of Buddha - Dhammapada - Pali cannon
The Bible - Christian religious documents - 18 English versions alone.
No originals of the old or new testaments exist.
The Book of Mormon - Church of Latter Day Saints
The Analects - Confuscianism
The Eddas and Sagas - Icelandic beliefs
Wicca - Neo paganism of Greece and Rome over the centuries
Bhagavgita and Rig Veda - Hinduism
Qur'an - Islam
The Tanakh - Jewism
Tao-Te-Ching - Taoism
Nag Hammadi - Gnostics
Zhuan Falun - Falun Gong
Of all these different Gods and belief systems which is the true one, if
any, and which are fakes? Non of these documents are objective evidence.
They are all documents written, hand copied, modified and further copied,
over the centuries, by errant men with their own personal and selfish
motivations. There is no way to determine authenticity or accuracy. The
objective evidence is that they are a mixture of history, myth, folklore and
legends.
Man can directly communicate essentially with the whole world via TV, the
Internet, Mobile Phone and Radio. If there is a REAL God, why does he not
announce to the whole world, from his heaven, that he is the real God and
all the others are fakes. And tell us clearly and directly what he expects
from us instead of using hundreds of vague, ancient and contradictory
documents compiled by dozens of different religions. Why is a real god
incapable or uninterested in directly communicating his wishes and commands
to his creations???
The objective evidence is that God did not create man but that man created
Gods (and the Bibles).
.
|
|
| User: "Richo" |
|
| Title: Re: BIBLE FALSE EVIDENCE |
20 Sep 2006 06:45:32 PM |
|
|
Bill M wrote:
People are constantly posting quotes from "The Bibles" as evidence or proof
of their god.
What a wild exageration!
A tiny minority of religious people do this - and even they do other
things - like eat and sleep for obvious examples.
Why focus all your energies on the equivalent of SHOUTING at these
people?
You are not going to change what could be mockingly refered to as their
"minds".
Bible literalists are fanatics. They are not going to believe anything
you say 'cause they KNOW that you work for Satan.
So all you do is create a big noise and make people upset and angry!
What a great achievement! You must be proud.
Idiot.
Mark.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: BIBLE FALSE EVIDENCE |
17 Sep 2006 06:11:59 PM |
|
|
Listen this, *****. The two worlds, the Catholic world and the
Islamic world
meet here along this verse: Christ/Messiah is a Prophet like Moses
Whether you refer to him as a Son Of God in the Catholic world or
Christ
the GREAT Prophet in the
Islamic world, those two worlds meet along the verse reported to have
been
said by Moses. This verse spoken 2500 years ago has command over
Geography,
Cultures, Law and it is the centere piece in the History of these two
worlds.
Hmmmmmmmmmm.... Evolution did not put it there. The mighty God did.
Of course we understand If you don't know how to assess our EVIDENCES.
secular learning to blame.
Bill M wrote:
People are constantly posting quotes from "The Bibles" as evidence or proof
of their god. This is not proof or evidence of anything other than hundreds
of opinions, myths, legends, fables and impossible tales were told by
hundreds of selfishly motivated people thousands of years ago. This all
occurred before man had any scientific knowledge of the Universe and a
printing press.
I keep seeing people quoting from the Bible as though it was proof or a
fact.
There is NO objective verifiable evidence that any of the Bibles are the
word of ANY God. There is no objective verifiable evidence that the stories
in the Bibles are historical fact. In fact most of the stories in the Bibles
are obviously, myths, fables and impossible nonsense.
There is NO objective evidence that the Bibles are the word of ANY God and
if they are he was truly a confused, erratic, mean and inconsistent story
teller.
There are no originals in existence. They are all hand copies and
modifications of copies of copies etc. with alterations, additions and
deletions to suite the transcribers motives. The printing press was not even
invented until the 15 Th. Century and the latest Bible copies date back
1,400 years and more before the invention of the printing press. The present
book of Bibles was assembled from numerous documents chosen by self
interested church leaders. They are not all or even most of the ancient
religious documents.
Here is a list of just the ENGLISH translations of these old and
unauthenticated Bibles. Which are the correct ones? And were the copies they
translated from accurate translations of the originals? NO originals exist.
NO ONE knows.
The evidence is that these Bibles, written and copied by over 150 men over a
period of over 2500 years are nothing but a combination of history, myths,
folklore and legends. Their content was motivated by ancient church leaders
to control their flocks.
It is very likely that these ancient documents were doctored and altered to
enhance the power of the clerics of the time. Many of these writings come
from fraud, interpolations, myths and hearsay.
There is NO objective evidence that they are accurate history or the words
of any God.
There are eighteen different English translations alone:
New American Standard
New International Version
Amplified Bible
New Living Translation
King James Version
Contemporary English Version
New King James Version
21 St. Century King James Version
New International Version
American Standard Version
Holman Christian Version
New Life Version
Darby Translation
Young's Literal Translation
New International Readers Version
World English Bible
New Revised Standard Version
The Jerusalem Bible
Religion built on the stories in the Bibles is a religion built on myths and
quick sand.
There are a plentitude of different religious documents that proclaim the
validity of various Gods. Which, if any, are correct?
Major sacred texts and documents;
Baha'i Sacrid writtings
Life of Buddha - Dhammapada - Pali cannon
The Bible - Christian religious documents - 18 English versions alone.
No originals of the old or new testaments exist.
The Book of Mormon - Church of Latter Day Saints
The Analects - Confuscianism
The Eddas and Sagas - Icelandic beliefs
Wicca - Neo paganism of Greece and Rome over the centuries
Bhagavgita and Rig Veda - Hinduism
Qur'an - Islam
The Tanakh - Jewism
Tao-Te-Ching - Taoism
Nag Hammadi - Gnostics
Zhuan Falun - Falun Gong
Of all these different Gods and belief systems which is the true one, if
any, and which are fakes? Non of these documents are objective evidence.
They are all documents written, hand copied, modified and further copied,
over the centuries, by errant men with their own personal and selfish
motivations. There is no way to determine authenticity or accuracy. The
objective evidence is that they are a mixture of history, myth, folklore and
legends.
Man can directly communicate essentially with the whole world via TV, the
Internet, Mobile Phone and Radio. If there is a REAL God, why does he not
announce to the whole world, from his heaven, that he is the real God and
all the others are fakes. And tell us clearly and directly what he expects
from us instead of using hundreds of vague, ancient and contradictory
documents compiled by dozens of different religions. Why is a real god
incapable or uninterested in directly communicating his wishes and commands
to his creations???
The objective evidence is that God did not create man but that man created
Gods (and the Bibles).
.
|
|
|
| User: "puma" |
|
| Title: Re: BIBLE FALSE EVIDENCE, Yes for sure |
23 Sep 2006 05:11:12 PM |
|
|
Who created those Gods really? Muslim God , Christian God, Jew God,
Hidu gods,they all are different...Codebreaker deem a bit before
answering...
Be mindfull,
Puma
codebreaker@bigsecret.com wrote:
Listen this, *****. The two worlds, the Catholic world and the
Islamic world
meet here along this verse: Christ/Messiah is a Prophet like Moses
Whether you refer to him as a Son Of God in the Catholic world or
Christ
the GREAT Prophet in the
Islamic world, those two worlds meet along the verse reported to have
been
said by Moses. This verse spoken 2500 years ago has command over
Geography,
Cultures, Law and it is the centere piece in the History of these two
worlds.
Hmmmmmmmmmm.... Evolution did not put it there. The mighty God did.
Of course we understand If you don't know how to assess our EVIDENCES.
secular learning to blame.
Bill M wrote:
People are constantly posting quotes from "The Bibles" as evidence or proof
of their god. This is not proof or evidence of anything other than hundreds
of opinions, myths, legends, fables and impossible tales were told by
hundreds of selfishly motivated people thousands of years ago. This all
occurred before man had any scientific knowledge of the Universe and a
printing press.
I keep seeing people quoting from the Bible as though it was proof or a
fact.
There is NO objective verifiable evidence that any of the Bibles are the
word of ANY God. There is no objective verifiable evidence that the stories
in the Bibles are historical fact. In fact most of the stories in the Bibles
are obviously, myths, fables and impossible nonsense.
There is NO objective evidence that the Bibles are the word of ANY God and
if they are he was truly a confused, erratic, mean and inconsistent story
teller.
There are no originals in existence. They are all hand copies and
modifications of copies of copies etc. with alterations, additions and
deletions to suite the transcribers motives. The printing press was not even
invented until the 15 Th. Century and the latest Bible copies date back
1,400 years and more before the invention of the printing press. The present
book of Bibles was assembled from numerous documents chosen by self
interested church leaders. They are not all or even most of the ancient
religious documents.
Here is a list of just the ENGLISH translations of these old and
unauthenticated Bibles. Which are the correct ones? And were the copies they
translated from accurate translations of the originals? NO originals exist.
NO ONE knows.
The evidence is that these Bibles, written and copied by over 150 men over a
period of over 2500 years are nothing but a combination of history, myths,
folklore and legends. Their content was motivated by ancient church leaders
to control their flocks.
It is very likely that these ancient documents were doctored and altered to
enhance the power of the clerics of the time. Many of these writings come
from fraud, interpolations, myths and hearsay.
There is NO objective evidence that they are accurate history or the words
of any God.
There are eighteen different English translations alone:
New American Standard
New International Version
Amplified Bible
New Living Translation
King James Version
Contemporary English Version
New King James Version
21 St. Century King James Version
New International Version
American Standard Version
Holman Christian Version
New Life Version
Darby Translation
Young's Literal Translation
New International Readers Version
World English Bible
New Revised Standard Version
The Jerusalem Bible
Religion built on the stories in the Bibles is a religion built on myths and
quick sand.
There are a plentitude of different religious documents that proclaim the
validity of various Gods. Which, if any, are correct?
Major sacred texts and documents;
Baha'i Sacrid writtings
Life of Buddha - Dhammapada - Pali cannon
The Bible - Christian religious documents - 18 English versions alone.
No originals of the old or new testaments exist.
The Book of Mormon - Church of Latter Day Saints
The Analects - Confuscianism
The Eddas and Sagas - Icelandic beliefs
Wicca - Neo paganism of Greece and Rome over the centuries
Bhagavgita and Rig Veda - Hinduism
Qur'an - Islam
The Tanakh - Jewism
Tao-Te-Ching - Taoism
Nag Hammadi - Gnostics
Zhuan Falun - Falun Gong
Of all these different Gods and belief systems which is the true one, if
any, and which are fakes? Non of these documents are objective evidence.
They are all documents written, hand copied, modified and further copied,
over the centuries, by errant men with their own personal and selfish
motivations. There is no way to determine authenticity or accuracy. The
objective evidence is that they are a mixture of history, myth, folklore and
legends.
Man can directly communicate essentially with the whole world via TV, the
Internet, Mobile Phone and Radio. If there is a REAL God, why does he not
announce to the whole world, from his heaven, that he is the real God and
all the others are fakes. And tell us clearly and directly what he expects
from us instead of using hundreds of vague, ancient and contradictory
documents compiled by dozens of different religions. Why is a real god
incapable or uninterested in directly communicating his wishes and commands
to his creations???
The objective evidence is that God did not create man but that man created
Gods (and the Bibles).
.
|
|
|
| User: "Libertarius" |
|
| Title: Re: BIBLE FALSE EVIDENCE, Yes for sure |
23 Sep 2006 06:11:40 PM |
|
|
puma wrote:
Who created those Gods really? Muslim God , Christian God, Jew God,
Hidu gods,they all are different...Codebreaker deem a bit before
answering...
Be mindfull,
Puma
===>Not only that, in fact every believer carries in his/her
own head the idea and image of what he/she thinks "GOD" is,
i.e. the creation of his/her own mind.
Thus, there are at least as many gods as there are believers,
and even more, because many believe in more than one. -- L.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Opie" |
|
| Title: Re: BIBLE FALSE EVIDENCE |
14 Sep 2006 09:25:45 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:40:29 -0400, "Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net>
wrote:
People are constantly posting quotes from "The Bibles" as evidence or
proof
of their god. This is not proof or evidence of anything other than
hundreds
of opinions, myths, legends, fables and impossible tales were told by
hundreds of selfishly motivated people thousands of years ago. This all
occurred before man had any scientific knowledge of the Universe and a
printing press.
I keep seeing people quoting from the Bible as though it was proof or a
fact.
There is NO objective verifiable evidence that any of the Bibles are the
word of ANY God. There is no objective verifiable evidence that the
stories
in the Bibles are historical fact. In fact most of the stories in the
Bibles
are obviously, myths, fables and impossible nonsense.
There is NO objective evidence that the Bibles are the word of ANY God
and
if they are he was truly a confused, erratic, mean and inconsistent
story
teller.
There are no originals in existence. They are all hand copies and
modifications of copies of copies etc. with alterations, additions and
deletions to suite the transcribers motives. The printing press was not
even
invented until the 15 Th. Century and the latest Bible copies date back
1,400 years and more before the invention of the printing press. The
present
book of Bibles was assembled from numerous documents chosen by self
interested church leaders. They are not all or even most of the ancient
religious documents.
Here is a list of just the ENGLISH translations of these old and
unauthenticated Bibles. Which are the correct ones? And were the copies
they
translated from accurate translations of the originals? NO originals
exist.
NO ONE knows.
The evidence is that these Bibles, written and copied by over 150 men
over a
period of over 2500 years are nothing but a combination of history,
myths,
folklore and legends. Their content was motivated by ancient church
leaders
to control their flocks.
It is very likely that these ancient documents were doctored and altered
to
enhance the power of the clerics of the time. Many of these writings
come
from fraud, interpolations, myths and hearsay.
There is NO objective evidence that they are accurate history or the
words
of any God.
There are eighteen different English translations alone:
New American Standard
New International Version
Amplified Bible
New Living Translation
King James Version
Contemporary English Version
New King James Version
21 St. Century King James Version
New International Version
American Standard Version
Holman Christian Version
New Life Version
Darby Translation
Young's Literal Translation
New International Readers Version
World English Bible
New Revised Standard Version
The Jerusalem Bible
Religion built on the stories in the Bibles is a religion built on myths
and
quick sand.
There are a plentitude of different religious documents that proclaim
the
validity of various Gods. Which, if any, are correct?
Major sacred texts and documents;
Baha'i Sacrid writtings
Life of Buddha - Dhammapada - Pali cannon
The Bible - Christian religious documents - 18 English versions alone.
No originals of the old or new testaments exist.
The Book of Mormon - Church of Latter Day Saints
The Analects - Confuscianism
The Eddas and Sagas - Icelandic beliefs
Wicca - Neo paganism of Greece and Rome over the centuries
Bhagavgita and Rig Veda - Hinduism
Qur'an - Islam
The Tanakh - Jewism
Tao-Te-Ching - Taoism
Nag Hammadi - Gnostics
Zhuan Falun - Falun Gong
Of all these different Gods and belief systems which is the true one, if
any, and which are fakes? Non of these documents are objective evidence.
They are all documents written, hand copied, modified and further
copied,
over the centuries, by errant men with their own personal and selfish
motivations. There is no way to determine authenticity or accuracy. The
objective evidence is that they are a mixture of history, myth, folklore
and
legends.
Man can directly communicate essentially with the whole world via TV,
the
Internet, Mobile Phone and Radio. If there is a REAL God, why does he
not
announce to the whole world, from his heaven, that he is the real God
and
all the others are fakes. And tell us clearly and directly what he
expects
from us instead of using hundreds of vague, ancient and contradictory
documents compiled by dozens of different religions. Why is a real god
incapable or uninterested in directly communicating his wishes and
commands
to his creations???
The objective evidence is that God did not create man but that man
created
Gods (and the Bibles).
You'd have more luck trying to teach a pig to sing.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Frank" |
|
| Title: Re: BIBLE FALSE EVIDENCE |
14 Sep 2006 04:24:28 PM |
|
|
"Opie" <OTaylor@MayberryRFD.net> wrote in message
news:dhpig2t1mkkcijvvpj21ci8s9qfedfj9k0@4ax.com...
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:40:29 -0400, "Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net>
wrote:
People are constantly posting quotes from "The Bibles" as evidence or
proof
of their god. This is not proof or evidence of anything other than
hundreds
of opinions, myths, legends, fables and impossible tales were told by
hundreds of selfishly motivated people thousands of years ago.
All religions are like that. They are philosophical constructs, based on
empathy in the Christian case. All your objections don't apply to value
judgments. It's the difference in mentality between one like Christ who will
not resist evil, but rather lets Himself be crucified so that others might
live, opposed to Goth who seeks oblivion in death, taking down the whole
world with him. See below
Pastor Frank
Jesus in Jn:13:34: A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one
another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another.
Jesus in Jn:13:35: By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples,
if ye have love one to another.
Jesus in Jn:15:12-13: This is my commandment: That ye love one another,
as I have loved you. Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down
his life for his friends.
Jesus in John 14:15 "If you love me, you will obey what I command...
.
|
|
|
| User: "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" |
|
| Title: Re: BIBLE FALSE EVIDENCE |
17 Sep 2006 09:56:37 AM |
|
|
"Pastor Frank" <PastorFrank@christfirst.org> wrote in message
news:6192a$450aa8ae$d1d89a49$26222@PRIMUS.CA...
"Opie" <OTaylor@MayberryRFD.net> wrote in message
news:dhpig2t1mkkcijvvpj21ci8s9qfedfj9k0@4ax.com...
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:40:29 -0400, "Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net>
wrote:
People are constantly posting quotes from "The Bibles" as evidence or
proof
of their god. This is not proof or evidence of anything other than
hundreds
of opinions, myths, legends, fables and impossible tales were told by
hundreds of selfishly motivated people thousands of years ago.
All religions are like that.
yes, they are all a crock of *****.
all religions are a fucking farce
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dan Wood" |
|
| Title: Re: BIBLE FALSE EVIDENCE |
17 Sep 2006 01:57:46 PM |
|
|
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:FmdPg.8715$v%4.8067@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Pastor Frank" <PastorFrank@christfirst.org> wrote in message
news:6192a$450aa8ae$d1d89a49$26222@PRIMUS.CA...
"Opie" <OTaylor@MayberryRFD.net> wrote in message
news:dhpig2t1mkkcijvvpj21ci8s9qfedfj9k0@4ax.com...
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:40:29 -0400, "Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net>
wrote:
People are constantly posting quotes from "The Bibles" as evidence or
proof
of their god. This is not proof or evidence of anything other than
hundreds
of opinions, myths, legends, fables and impossible tales were told by
hundreds of selfishly motivated people thousands of years ago.
All religions are like that.
yes, they are all a crock of *****.
all religions are a fucking farce
If your mommy by chance read what you are posting. She would
wash your mouth out with soap and take away your computer privilege.
Dan Wood
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dan Wood" |
|
| Title: Re: BIBLE FALSE EVIDENCE |
13 Sep 2006 11:26:43 PM |
|
|
Why cross this crap to Christian newsgroups? This is
obviously Christian baiting. Then if a Christian takes
issue with this crap, the original poster feigns an
affront and pretends that atheists are being attacked
by intolerant Christians.
Dan Wood
"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:s8ZNg.38916$ry2.9232@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
People are constantly posting quotes from "The Bibles" as evidence or
proof
of their god. This is not proof or evidence of anything other than
hundreds
of opinions, myths, legends, fables and impossible tales were told by
hundreds of selfishly motivated people thousands of years ago. This all
occurred before man had any scientific knowledge of the Universe and a
printing press.
I keep seeing people quoting from the Bible as though it was proof or a
fact.
There is NO objective verifiable evidence that any of the Bibles are the
word of ANY God. There is no objective verifiable evidence that the
stories
in the Bibles are historical fact. In fact most of the stories in the
Bibles
are obviously, myths, fables and impossible nonsense.
There is NO objective evidence that the Bibles are the word of ANY God and
if they are he was truly a confused, erratic, mean and inconsistent story
teller.
There are no originals in existence. They are all hand copies and
modifications of copies of copies etc. with alterations, additions and
deletions to suite the transcribers motives. The printing press was not
even
invented until the 15 Th. Century and the latest Bible copies date back
1,400 years and more before the invention of the printing press. The
present
book of Bibles was assembled from numerous documents chosen by self
interested church leaders. They are not all or even most of the ancient
religious documents.
Here is a list of just the ENGLISH translations of these old and
unauthenticated Bibles. Which are the correct ones? And were the copies
they
translated from accurate translations of the originals? NO originals
exist.
NO ONE knows.
The evidence is that these Bibles, written and copied by over 150 men over
a
period of over 2500 years are nothing but a combination of history, myths,
folklore and legends. Their content was motivated by ancient church
leaders
to control their flocks.
It is very likely that these ancient documents were doctored and altered
to
enhance the power of the clerics of the time. Many of these writings come
from fraud, interpolations, myths and hearsay.
There is NO objective evidence that they are accurate history or the
words
of any God.
There are eighteen different English translations alone:
New American Standard
New International Version
Amplified Bible
New Living Translation
King James Version
Contemporary English Version
New King James Version
21 St. Century King James Version
New International Version
American Standard Version
Holman Christian Version
New Life Version
Darby Translation
Young's Literal Translation
New International Readers Version
World English Bible
New Revised Standard Version
The Jerusalem Bible
Religion built on the stories in the Bibles is a religion built on myths
and
quick sand.
There are a plentitude of different religious documents that proclaim the
validity of various Gods. Which, if any, are correct?
Major sacred texts and documents;
Baha'i Sacrid writtings
Life of Buddha - Dhammapada - Pali cannon
The Bible - Christian religious documents - 18 English versions alone.
No originals of the old or new testaments exist.
The Book of Mormon - Church of Latter Day Saints
The Analects - Confuscianism
The Eddas and Sagas - Icelandic beliefs
Wicca - Neo paganism of Greece and Rome over the centuries
Bhagavgita and Rig Veda - Hinduism
Qur'an - Islam
The Tanakh - Jewism
Tao-Te-Ching - Taoism
Nag Hammadi - Gnostics
Zhuan Falun - Falun Gong
Of all these different Gods and belief systems which is the true one, if
any, and which are fakes? Non of these documents are objective evidence.
They are all documents written, hand copied, modified and further copied,
over the centuries, by errant men with their own personal and selfish
motivations. There is no way to determine authenticity or accuracy. The
objective evidence is that they are a mixture of history, myth, folklore
and
legends.
Man can directly communicate essentially with the whole world via TV, the
Internet, Mobile Phone and Radio. If there is a REAL God, why does he not
announce to the whole world, from his heaven, that he is the real God and
all the others are fakes. And tell us clearly and directly what he expects
from us instead of using hundreds of vague, ancient and contradictory
documents compiled by dozens of different religions. Why is a real god
incapable or uninterested in directly communicating his wishes and
commands
to his creations???
The objective evidence is that God did not create man but that man created
Gods (and the Bibles).
.
|
|
|
| User: "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" |
|
| Title: Re: BIBLE FALSE EVIDENCE |
14 Sep 2006 09:34:22 PM |
|
|
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1S4Og.25307$IM1.7404@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
Why cross this crap to Christian newsgroups? This is
obviously Christian baiting. Then if a Christian takes
issue with this crap, the original poster feigns an
affront and pretends that atheists are being attacked
by intolerant Christians.
Dan Wood
so, let me know when you've eliminated the words "in invisible,
child-killing, mass-murdering non-existant sky pixie jackass you trust" from
all coins, public buildings, etc.
thank you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dan Wood" |
|
| Title: Re: BIBLE FALSE EVIDENCE |
14 Sep 2006 11:41:11 PM |
|
|
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:OioOg.1694$UG4.162@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1S4Og.25307$IM1.7404@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
Why cross this crap to Christian newsgroups? This is
obviously Christian baiting. Then if a Christian takes
issue with this crap, the original poster feigns an
affront and pretends that atheists are being attacked
by intolerant Christians.
Dan Wood
so, let me know when you've eliminated the words "in invisible,
child-killing, mass-murdering non-existant sky pixie jackass you trust"
from
all coins, public buildings, etc.
It's still crap being crossposted to Christian newsgroups by extremely
intolerant
atheist.
Dan
thank you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: BIBLE FALSE EVIDENCE |
15 Sep 2006 02:36:15 AM |
|
|
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> writes:
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:OioOg.1694$UG4.162@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1S4Og.25307$IM1.7404@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
Why cross this crap to Christian newsgroups? This is
obviously Christian baiting. Then if a Christian takes
issue with this crap, the original poster feigns an
affront and pretends that atheists are being attacked
by intolerant Christians.
Dan Wood
so, let me know when you've eliminated the words "in invisible,
child-killing, mass-murdering non-existant sky pixie jackass you trust"
from all coins, public buildings, etc.
It's still crap being crossposted to Christian newsgroups by extremely
intolerant
atheist.
....by a whiny Jeezoid who apparently can't keep himself from preaching where
he's not welcome.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: BIBLE FALSE EVIDENCE |
15 Sep 2006 10:50:44 AM |
|
|
Very telling that Mr. Wood avoided my explanation about this
"tolerance" jazz just to post the same ***** again. Coward. You
obviously know you're full of dogshit otherwise you wouldn't have
dodged my point.
Dan Wood wrote:
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:OioOg.1694$UG4.162@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1S4Og.25307$IM1.7404@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
Why cross this crap to Christian newsgroups? This is
obviously Christian baiting. Then if a Christian takes
issue with this crap, the original poster feigns an
affront and pretends that atheists are being attacked
by intolerant Christians.
Dan Wood
so, let me know when you've eliminated the words "in invisible,
child-killing, mass-murdering non-existant sky pixie jackass you trust"
from
all coins, public buildings, etc.
It's still crap being crossposted to Christian newsgroups by extremely
intolerant
atheist.
Dan
thank you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dan Wood" |
|
| Title: Re: BIBLE FALSE EVIDENCE |
15 Sep 2006 12:41:10 PM |
|
|
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158335444.880906.17150@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Very telling that Mr. Wood avoided my explanation about this
"tolerance" jazz just to post the same ***** again. Coward. You
obviously know you're full of dogshit otherwise you wouldn't have
dodged my point.
I saw no need to. I've seen it all before.
Dan Wood
Dan Wood wrote:
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:OioOg.1694$UG4.162@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1S4Og.25307$IM1.7404@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
Why cross this crap to Christian newsgroups? This is
obviously Christian baiting. Then if a Christian takes
issue with this crap, the original poster feigns an
affront and pretends that atheists are being attacked
by intolerant Christians.
Dan Wood
so, let me know when you've eliminated the words "in invisible,
child-killing, mass-murdering non-existant sky pixie jackass you
trust"
from
all coins, public buildings, etc.
It's still crap being crossposted to Christian newsgroups by extremely
intolerant
atheist.
Dan
thank you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: BIBLE FALSE EVIDENCE |
15 Sep 2006 01:11:09 PM |
|
|
Dan Wood wrote:
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158335444.880906.17150@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Very telling that Mr. Wood avoided my explanation about this
"tolerance" jazz just to post the same ***** again. Coward. You
obviously know you're full of dogshit otherwise you wouldn't have
dodged my point.
I saw no need to.
To do what? Dodge my point? If you saw no need to, why did you do it?
I've seen it all before.
You've dodged it all before. You're absolutely pathetic. I'm right and
you know it, but you aren't man enough to even accept that.
Dan Wood
Dan Wood wrote:
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:OioOg.1694$UG4.162@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1S4Og.25307$IM1.7404@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
Why cross this crap to Christian newsgroups? This is
obviously Christian baiting. Then if a Christian takes
issue with this crap, the original poster feigns an
affront and pretends that atheists are being attacked
by intolerant Christians.
Dan Wood
so, let me know when you've eliminated the words "in invisible,
child-killing, mass-murdering non-existant sky pixie jackass you
trust"
from
all coins, public buildings, etc.
It's still crap being crossposted to Christian newsgroups by extremely
intolerant
atheist.
Dan
thank you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dan Wood" |
|
| Title: Re: BIBLE FALSE EVIDENCE |
15 Sep 2006 06:52:34 PM |
|
|
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158343869.064510.140480@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Dan Wood wrote:
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158335444.880906.17150@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Very telling that Mr. Wood avoided my explanation about this
"tolerance" jazz just to post the same ***** again. Coward. You
obviously know you're full of dogshit otherwise you wouldn't have
dodged my point.
I saw no need to.
To do what? Dodge my point? If you saw no need to, why did you do it?
I initially asked a question, why crosspost this crap to Christian
Newsgroups. You chose to ignore my query. Instead you decided
to add insult to injury. So why bother with you?
<
<snip>
Dan Wood
Dan Wood wrote:
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:OioOg.1694$UG4.162@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1S4Og.25307$IM1.7404@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
Why cross this crap to Christian newsgroups? This is
obviously Christian baiting. Then if a Christian takes
issue with this crap, the original poster feigns an
affront and pretends that atheists are being attacked
by intolerant Christians.
Dan Wood
so, let me know when you've eliminated the words "in invisible,
child-killing, mass-murdering non-existant sky pixie jackass you
trust"
from
all coins, public buildings, etc.
It's still crap being crossposted to Christian newsgroups by
extremely
intolerant
atheist.
Dan
thank you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: BIBLE FALSE EVIDENCE |
15 Sep 2006 10:54:02 PM |
|
|
Dan Wood wrote:
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158343869.064510.140480@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Dan Wood wrote:
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158335444.880906.17150@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Very telling that Mr. Wood avoided my explanation about this
"tolerance" jazz just to post the same ***** again. Coward. You
obviously know you're full of dogshit otherwise you wouldn't have
dodged my point.
I saw no need to.
To do what? Dodge my point? If you saw no need to, why did you do it?
I initially asked a question, why crosspost this crap to Christian
Newsgroups. You chose to ignore my query. Instead you decided
to add insult to injury. So why bother with you?
Well then. I apologize if the implications were not clear. The obvious
reason the post in question was crossposted to Christian newsgroups is
because it was, in part, directed at Christians. Your turn now.
<
<snip>
Dan Wood
Dan Wood wrote:
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:OioOg.1694$UG4.162@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1S4Og.25307$IM1.7404@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
Why cross this crap to Christian newsgroups? This is
obviously Christian baiting. Then if a Christian takes
issue with this crap, the original poster feigns an
affront and pretends that atheists are being attacked
by intolerant Christians.
Dan Wood
so, let me know when you've eliminated the words "in invisible,
child-killing, mass-murdering non-existant sky pixie jackass you
trust"
from
all coins, public buildings, etc.
It's still crap being crossposted to Christian newsgroups by
extremely
intolerant
atheist.
Dan
thank you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dan Wood" |
|
| Title: Re: BIBLE FALSE EVIDENCE |
15 Sep 2006 11:42:20 PM |
|
|
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158378842.213264.271160@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Dan Wood wrote:
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158343869.064510.140480@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Dan Wood wrote:
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158335444.880906.17150@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Very telling that Mr. Wood avoided my explanation about this
"tolerance" jazz just to post the same ***** again. Coward. You
obviously know you're full of dogshit otherwise you wouldn't have
dodged my point.
I saw no need to.
To do what? Dodge my point? If you saw no need to, why did you do it?
I initially asked a question, why crosspost this crap to Christian
Newsgroups. You chose to ignore my query. Instead you decided
to add insult to injury. So why bother with you?
Well then. I apologize if the implications were not clear. The obvious
reason the post in question was crossposted to Christian newsgroups is
because it was, in part, directed at Christians. Your turn now.
<
<snip>
Dan Wood
Dan Wood wrote:
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:OioOg.1694$UG4.162@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1S4Og.25307$IM1.7404@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
Why cross this crap to Christian newsgroups? This is
obviously Christian baiting. Then if a Christian takes
issue with this crap, the original poster feigns an
affront and pretends that atheists are being attacked
by intolerant Christians.
Dan Wood
so, let me know when you've eliminated the words "in
invisible,
child-killing, mass-murdering non-existant sky pixie jackass
you
trust"
from
all coins, public buildings, etc.
It's still crap being crossposted to Christian newsgroups by
extremely
intolerant
atheist.
Dan
thank you.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dan Wood" |
|
| Title: Re: BIBLE FALSE EVIDENCE |
16 Sep 2006 10:26:44 AM |
|
|
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158378842.213264.271160@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Dan Wood wrote:
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158343869.064510.140480@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Dan Wood wrote:
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158335444.880906.17150@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Very telling that Mr. Wood avoided my explanation about this
"tolerance" jazz just to post the same ***** again. Coward. You
obviously know you're full of dogshit otherwise you wouldn't have
dodged my point.
I saw no need to.
To do what? Dodge my point? If you saw no need to, why did you do it?
I initially asked a question, why crosspost this crap to Christian
Newsgroups. You chose to ignore my query. Instead you decided
to add insult to injury. So why bother with you?
Well then. I apologize if the implications were not clear. The obvious
reason the post in question was crossposted to Christian newsgroups is
because it was, in part, directed at Christians. Your turn now.
But why? Why is my beliefs or the beliefs of other people of religion
your concern?
Dan
<
<snip>
Dan Wood
Dan Wood wrote:
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:OioOg.1694$UG4.162@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1S4Og.25307$IM1.7404@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
Why cross this crap to Christian newsgroups? This is
obviously Christian baiting. Then if a Christian takes
issue with this crap, the original poster feigns an
affront and pretends that atheists are being attacked
by intolerant Christians.
Dan Wood
so, let me know when you've eliminated the words "in
invisible,
child-killing, mass-murdering non-existant sky pixie jackass
you
trust"
from
all coins, public buildings, etc.
It's still crap being crossposted to Christian newsgroups by
extremely
intolerant
atheist.
Dan
thank you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: BIBLE FALSE EVIDENCE |
16 Sep 2006 10:31:01 PM |
|
|
Beliefs have consequences is why. You're obviously taking issue with my
beliefs just by posting. Why do I need to go through this again? It is
so obvious to anyone who isn't delusional. My belief that other
people's beliefs are my business is a belief. To dispute this is making
this belief your business, therefore you can't hold this position
without contradicting yourself. You dodge this because there is
obviously no flaw in the logic, it should be common sense to any child.
You are wrong. The adult thing to do right now is admit to being wrong.
Dan Wood wrote:
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158378842.213264.271160@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Dan Wood wrote:
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158343869.064510.140480@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Dan Wood wrote:
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158335444.880906.17150@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Very telling that Mr. Wood avoided my explanation about this
"tolerance" jazz just to post the same ***** again. Coward. You
obviously know you're full of dogshit otherwise you wouldn't have
dodged my point.
I saw no need to.
To do what? Dodge my point? If you saw no need to, why did you do it?
I initially asked a question, why crosspost this crap to Christian
Newsgroups. You chose to ignore my query. Instead you decided
to add insult to injury. So why bother with you?
Well then. I apologize if the implications were not clear. The obvious
reason the post in question was crossposted to Christian newsgroups is
because it was, in part, directed at Christians. Your turn now.
But why? Why is my beliefs or the beliefs of other people of religion
your concern?
Dan
<
<snip>
Dan Wood
Dan Wood wrote:
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:OioOg.1694$UG4.162@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1S4Og.25307$IM1.7404@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
Why cross this crap to Christian newsgroups? This is
obviously Christian baiting. Then if a Christian takes
issue with this crap, the original poster feigns an
affront and pretends that atheists are being attacked
by intolerant Christians.
Dan Wood
so, let me know when you've eliminated the words "in
invisible,
child-killing, mass-murdering non-existant sky pixie jackass
you
trust"
from
all coins, public buildings, etc.
It's still crap being crossposted to Christian newsgroups by
extremely
intolerant
atheist.
Dan
thank you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Frank" |
|
| Title: Re: BIBLE FALSE EVIDENCE |
17 Sep 2006 07:35:14 AM |
|
|
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158463861.122508.123110@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
Beliefs have consequences is why. You're obviously taking issue with my
beliefs just by posting. Why do I need to go through this again? It is
so obvious to anyone who isn't delusional. My belief that other
people's beliefs are my business is a belief. To dispute this is making
this belief your business, therefore you can't hold this position
without contradicting yourself. You dodge this because there is
obviously no flaw in the logic, it should be common sense to any child.
You are wrong. The adult thing to do right now is admit to being wrong.
Top poster are always "wrong" and deserve hell.
----------------
Dan Wood wrote:
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158378842.213264.271160@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Dan Wood wrote:
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158343869.064510.140480@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Dan Wood wrote:
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158335444.880906.17150@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Very telling that Mr. Wood avoided my explanation about this
"tolerance" jazz just to post the same ***** again. Coward.
You
obviously know you're full of dogshit otherwise you wouldn't
have
dodged my point.
I saw no need to.
To do what? Dodge my point? If you saw no need to, why did you do
it?
I initially asked a question, why crosspost this crap to Christian
Newsgroups. You chose to ignore my query. Instead you decided
to add insult to injury. So why bother with you?
Well then. I apologize if the implications were not clear. The obvious
reason the post in question was crossposted to Christian newsgroups is
because it was, in part, directed at Christians. Your turn now.
But why? Why is my beliefs or the beliefs of other people of religion
your concern?
Dan
<
<snip>
Dan Wood
Dan Wood wrote:
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in
message
news:OioOg.1694$UG4.162@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1S4Og.25307$IM1.7404@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
Why cross this crap to Christian newsgroups? This is
obviously Christian baiting. Then if a Christian takes
issue with this crap, the original poster feigns an
affront and pretends that atheists are being attacked
by intolerant Christians.
Dan Wood
so, let me know when you've eliminated the words "in
invisible,
child-killing, mass-murdering non-existant sky pixie
jackass
you
trust"
from
all coins, public buildings, etc.
It's still crap being crossposted to Christian newsgroups by
extremely
intolerant
atheist.
Dan
thank you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dan Wood" |
|
| Title: Re: BIBLE FALSE EVIDENCE |
17 Sep 2006 01:44:26 PM |
|
|
"Pastor Frank" <PastorFrank@christfirst.org> wrote in message
news:e5ba0$450d60bb$d1d89a96$30743@PRIMUS.CA...
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158463861.122508.123110@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
Beliefs have consequences is why. You're obviously taking issue with my
beliefs just by posting. Why do I need to go through this again? It is
so obvious to anyone who isn't delusional. My belief that other
people's beliefs are my business is a belief. To dispute this is making
this belief your business, therefore you can't hold this position
without contradicting yourself. You dodge this because there is
obviously no flaw in the logic, it should be common sense to any child.
You are wrong. The adult thing to do right now is admit to being wrong.
Top poster are always "wrong" and deserve hell.
NO ONE _deserves_hell. As I recall hell is for the wicked. There is nothing
wicked or evil in top posting. But anyway hell is nothing other than sheol -
the grave.
Dan Wood, DDS
----------------
Dan Wood wrote:
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158378842.213264.271160@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Dan Wood wrote:
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158343869.064510.140480@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Dan Wood wrote:
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158335444.880906.17150@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Very telling that Mr. Wood avoided my explanation about this
"tolerance" jazz just to post the same ***** again.
Coward.
You
obviously know you're full of dogshit otherwise you wouldn't
have
dodged my point.
I saw no need to.
To do what? Dodge my point? If you saw no need to, why did you do
it?
I initially asked a question, why crosspost this crap to Christian
Newsgroups. You chose to ignore my query. Instead you decided
to add insult to injury. So why bother with you?
Well then. I apologize if the implications were not clear. The
obvious
reason the post in question was crossposted to Christian newsgroups
is
because it was, in part, directed at Christians. Your turn now.
But why? Why is my beliefs or the beliefs of other people of religion
your concern?
Dan
<
<snip>
Dan Wood
Dan Wood wrote:
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in
message
news:OioOg.1694$UG4.162@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1S4Og.25307$IM1.7404@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
Why cross this crap to Christian newsgroups? This is
obviously Christian baiting. Then if a Christian takes
issue with this crap, the original poster feigns an
affront and pretends that atheists are being attacked
by intolerant Christians.
Dan Wood
so, let me know when you've eliminated the words "in
invisible,
child-killing, mass-murdering non-existant sky pixie
jackass
you
trust"
from
all coins, public buildings, etc.
It's still crap being crossposted to Christian newsgroups
by
extremely
intolerant
atheist.
Dan
thank you.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: BIBLE FALSE EVIDENCE |
17 Sep 2006 08:38:34 PM |
|
|
Pastor Frank wrote:
Top poster are always "wrong" and deserve hell.
Genius. Pastor Frank forfeits.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dan Wood" |
|
| Title: Re: BIBLE FALSE EVIDENCE |
17 Sep 2006 01:55:42 PM |
|
|
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158463861.122508.123110@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
Beliefs have consequences is why. You're obviously taking issue with my
beliefs just by posting. Why do I need to go through this again? It is
so obvious to anyone who isn't delusional. My belief that other
people's beliefs are my business is a belief. To dispute this is making
this belief your business, therefore you can't hold this position
without contradicting yourself. You dodge this because there is
obviously no flaw in the logic, it should be common sense to any child.
You are wrong. The adult thing to do right now is admit to being wrong.
Nonsense, by invading a Christian NG and attacking something
that is important and personal to theist to invites a response. And
it's understandable.
If you were to invade my home and insulted or attacked my wife
or child, I would respond and I would be well within my rights.
Invading a religious newsgroup and attacking the beliefs of
subscribers is no different. It's an aggressive and pugnacious
behavior.
Dan Wood.
Dan Wood wrote:
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158378842.213264.271160@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Dan Wood wrote:
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158343869.064510.140480@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Dan Wood wrote:
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158335444.880906.17150@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Very telling that Mr. Wood avoided my explanation about this
"tolerance" jazz just to post the same ***** again. Coward.
You
obviously know you're full of dogshit otherwise you wouldn't
have
dodged my point.
I saw no need to.
To do what? Dodge my point? If you saw no need to, why did you do
it?
I initially asked a question, why crosspost this crap to Christian
Newsgroups. You chose to ignore my query. Instead you decided
to add insult to injury. So why bother with you?
Well then. I apologize if the implications were not clear. The obvious
reason the post in question was crossposted to Christian newsgroups is
because it was, in part, directed at Christians. Your turn now.
But why? Why is my beliefs or the beliefs of other people of religion
your concern?
Dan
<
<snip>
Dan Wood
Dan Wood wrote:
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in
message
news:OioOg.1694$UG4.162@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1S4Og.25307$IM1.7404@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
Why cross this crap to Christian newsgroups? This is
obviously Christian baiting. Then if a Christian takes
issue with this crap, the original poster feigns an
affront and pretends that atheists are being attacked
by intolerant Christians.
Dan Wood
so, let me know when you've eliminated the words "in
invisible,
child-killing, mass-murdering non-existant sky pixie
jackass
you
trust"
from
all coins, public buildings, etc.
It's still crap being crossposted to Christian newsgroups by
extremely
intolerant
atheist.
Dan
thank you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: BIBLE FALSE EVIDENCE |
19 Sep 2006 12:05:21 AM |
|
|
Dan Wood wrote:
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158463861.122508.123110@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
Beliefs have consequences is why. You're obviously taking issue with my
beliefs just by posting. Why do I need to go through this again? It is
so obvious to anyone who isn't delusional. My belief that other
people's beliefs are my business is a belief. To dispute this is making
this belief your business, therefore you can't hold this position
without contradicting yourself. You dodge this because there is
obviously no flaw in the logic, it should be common sense to any child.
You are wrong. The adult thing to do right now is admit to being wrong.
Nonsense, by invading a Christian NG and attacking something
that is important and personal to theist to invites a response. And
it's understandable.
Of course it invites a response, this is a discussion group. And this
isn't just being crossposted to "Christian" newsgroups. More hypocrisy
from you, baby boy. The fact is, what you call an "invasion" is a reply
to a crosspost to groups of differing religious affiliation just like
yours. A retarded child wouldn't be stupid as to make assertions like
yours.
If you were to invade my home and insulted or attacked my wife
or child,
First of all, you are comparing replying to a crosspost to five
seperate unmoderated public groups (including alt.atheism) to breaking
into your home. There are some things that are so stupid that they
become so irrelevant that the ball just sits in the other guy's court
as he whacks the ball like he's trying to kill it. I'll stay on my side
of the net, thanks. I could bring up again that you are posting to an
atheist newsgroup, but that would be too obviously hypocritical for
such an obvious hypocrite to understand. A retarded hamster, maybe, but
not you.
I would respond and I would be well within my rights.
You have the right to remain stupid, everything you say can and will be
used against you.
Invading a religious newsgroup
Invading an atheist newsgroup, are you? Oh yes, it seems you are.
"alt.atheism" is at the first of the list. Probably just an
alphabetical thing, but yet the obvious is still so obvious. What is so
hard to understand about this? You are replying to a CROSSPOST with
your beliefs to an ATHEIST group. It seems like any child could
understand the hypocrisy, so why can't you? I hate people sometimes,
too, but not enough to even imply that you're a person. That would be
just not fair.
and attacking the beliefs of
subscribers is no different. It's an aggressive and pugnacious
behavior.
You're simply pathetic. You've never looked in the mirror and seen
yourself for what you are, or you would have choked on vomit. You have
no standards for what you are. Everything you say is hypocritical,
including this last aggressive and pugnacious attack which was refuted
in the very post you are replying to. You say "nonsense", and prove
every detail correct. Your response really doesn't even seem like an
attempt at a refute to mine, it seems more like an illustration.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: BIBLE FALSE EVIDENCE |
15 Sep 2006 10:54:07 PM |
|
|
Dan Wood wrote:
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158343869.064510.140480@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Dan Wood wrote:
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158335444.880906.17150@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Very telling that Mr. Wood avoided my explanation about this
"tolerance" jazz just to post the same ***** again. Coward. You
obviously know you're full of dogshit otherwise you wouldn't have
dodged my point.
I saw no need to.
To do what? Dodge my point? If you saw no need to, why did you do it?
I initially asked a question, why crosspost this crap to Christian
Newsgroups. You chose to ignore my query. Instead you decided
to add insult to injury. So why bother with you?
Well then. I apologize if the implications were not clear. The obvious
reason the post in question was crossposted to Christian newsgroups is
because it was, in part, directed at Christians. Your turn now.
<
<snip>
Dan Wood
Dan Wood wrote:
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:OioOg.1694$UG4.162@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1S4Og.25307$IM1.7404@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
Why cross this crap to Christian newsgroups? This is
obviously Christian baiting. Then if a Christian takes
issue with this crap, the original poster feigns an
affront and pretends that atheists are being attacked
by intolerant Christians.
Dan Wood
so, let me know when you've eliminated the words "in invisible,
child-killing, mass-murdering non-existant sky pixie jackass you
trust"
from
all coins, public buildings, etc.
It's still crap being crossposted to Christian newsgroups by
extremely
intolerant
atheist.
Dan
thank you.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: BIBLE FALSE EVIDENCE |
15 Sep 2006 10:54:08 PM |
|
|
Dan Wood wrote:
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158343869.064510.140480@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Dan Wood wrote:
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158335444.880906.17150@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Very telling that Mr. Wood avoided my explanation about this
"tolerance" jazz just to post the same ***** again. Coward. You
obviously know you're full of dogshit otherwise you wouldn't have
dodged my point.
I saw no need to.
To do what? Dodge my point? If you saw no need to, why did you do it?
I initially asked a question, why crosspost this crap to Christian
Newsgroups. You chose to ignore my query. Instead you decided
to add insult to injury. So why bother with you?
Well then. I apologize if the implications were not clear. The obvious
reason the post in question was crossposted to Christian newsgroups is
because it was, in part, directed at Christians. Your turn now.
<
<snip>
Dan Wood
Dan Wood wrote:
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:OioOg.1694$UG4.162@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1S4Og.25307$IM1.7404@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
Why cross this crap to Christian newsgroups? This is
obviously Christian baiting. Then if a Christian takes
issue with this crap, the original poster feigns an
affront and pretends that atheists are being attacked
by intolerant Christians.
Dan Wood
so, let me know when you've eliminated the words "in invisible,
child-killing, mass-murdering non-existant sky pixie jackass you
trust"
from
all coins, public buildings, etc.
It's still crap being crossposted to Christian newsgroups by
extremely
intolerant
atheist.
Dan
thank you.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Free Lunch" |
|
| Title: Re: BIBLE FALSE EVIDENCE |
15 Sep 2006 06:59:06 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 19:52:34 -0400, in alt.atheism
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in
<G1HOg.382$GY5.32@bignews6.bellsouth.net>:
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158343869.064510.140480@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Dan Wood wrote:
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158335444.880906.17150@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Very telling that Mr. Wood avoided my explanation about this
"tolerance" jazz just to post the same ***** again. Coward. You
obviously know you're full of dogshit otherwise you wouldn't have
dodged my point.
I saw no need to.
To do what? Dodge my point? If you saw no need to, why did you do it?
I initially asked a question, why crosspost this crap to Christian
Newsgroups. You chose to ignore my query. Instead you decided
to add insult to injury. So why bother with you?
As far as I can tell, a very large portion is started by self-described
Christians who enjoy annoying both atheists and their 'fellow'
Christians. I've seen so many lies and statements that are contrary to
Jesus's teachings from these self-described Christians that I have no
reason to believe that they are Christian or atheist, merely
troublemakers who are entertaining themselves.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dan Wood" |
|
| Title: Re: BIBLE FALSE EVIDENCE |
16 Sep 2006 10:22:23 AM |
|
|
"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:4efmg292st27srici4sfrb7pq61tmlljoe@4ax.com...
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 19:52:34 -0400, in alt.atheism
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in
<G1HOg.382$GY5.32@bignews6.bellsouth.net>:
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158343869.064510.140480@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Dan Wood wrote:
<thedeviliam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158335444.880906.17150@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Very telling that Mr. Wood avoided my explanation about this
"tolerance" jazz just to post the same ***** again. Coward. You
obviously know you're full of dogshit otherwise you wouldn't have
dodged my point.
I saw no need to.
To do what? Dodge my point? If you saw no need to, why did you do it?
I initially asked a question, why crosspost this crap to Christian
Newsgroups. You chose to ignore my query. Instead you decided
to add insult to injury. So why bother with you?
As far as I can tell, a very large portion is started by self-described
Christians who enjoy annoying both atheists and their 'fellow'
Christians. I've seen so many lies and statements that are contrary to
Jesus's teachings from these self-described Christians that I have no
reason to believe that they are Christian or atheist, merely
troublemakers who are entertaining themselves.
This is probably true. This, the United States, is a free country.
Freedom _of_ religion, I alway thought meant one should be
free to worship God or not according to the dictates ones
own conscience _and_ not have to endure being insulted,
harassed or attacked by who do not share the same views.
Dan Wood, DDS (retired)
.
|
| | | | | | | | |
