| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Eris" |
| Date: |
01 Jun 2004 12:22:27 PM |
| Object: |
Bill Clinton a standard the right is trying to meet. |
I see that for every criticisim of Bush is met with a proof that our
great exPresident also said or did the same thing. So that would make
the Clinton Administration a moral standard that the right is trying
to meet.
.
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Clinton a standard the right is trying to meet. |
01 Jun 2004 01:50:57 PM |
|
|
Eris <Vithant01@comcast.net> wrote in
news:qoepb0pfsnhcu1u01muhp926pn0adaoise@4ax.com:
I see that for every criticisim of Bush is met with a proof that our
great exPresident also said or did the same thing. So that would make
the Clinton Administration a moral standard that the right is trying
to meet.
When Clinton was accused of sexual harrassment and adultery one of the main
defenses put up by the Democrats was "these Republicans did it too!". If
it's good enough for the Democrats...
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil?
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Clinton a standard the right is trying to meet. |
01 Jun 2004 07:25:30 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
When Clinton was accused of sexual harrassment
Pure slander.
and adultery
So what?
one of the main defenses put up by the Democrats was
"these Republicans did it too!".
*****.
That's a lie. You might have heard or seen that, but it was
hardly "the" or even "a" main defense.
The fact was that it didn't matter. It was irrelevant. It's not a
crime to be a bad President, and there's no excuse for the
"Whitewater" investigator even looking into it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Clinton a standard the right is trying to meet. |
01 Jun 2004 08:44:19 PM |
|
|
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in news:rNudnQNjUdrOgCDdRVn-
gw@comcast.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
When Clinton was accused of sexual harrassment
Pure slander.
and adultery
So what?
one of the main defenses put up by the Democrats was
"these Republicans did it too!".
*****.
That's a lie. You might have heard or seen that, but it was
hardly "the" or even "a" main defense.
Larry Flynt.
The fact was that it didn't matter. It was irrelevant. It's not a
crime to be a bad President, and there's no excuse for the
"Whitewater" investigator even looking into it.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil?
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Clinton a standard the right is trying to meet. |
01 Jun 2004 09:13:01 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
That's a lie. You might have heard or seen that, but it was
hardly "the" or even "a" main defense.
Larry Flynt.
So the only way you can make sense is if, through a psychotic
episode, we imagine Larry Flynt to be Clinton's chief defender?
Amazing.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Clinton a standard the right is trying to meet. |
02 Jun 2004 02:24:18 AM |
|
|
Great Lord Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>, braving the raging
storm, scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Wed, 02 Jun 2004
01:44:19 GMT and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.
one of the main defenses put up by the Democrats was
"these Republicans did it too!".
*****.
That's a lie. You might have heard or seen that, but it was
hardly "the" or even "a" main defense.
Larry Flynt.
I see.
And what position did Larry Flynt hold in the government at the time?
Or was he employed by the Democratic National Committee?
Or was he just a renowned loudmouth speaking on his own?
Did you know that the GOP endorses killing bald eagles? Really!
Well, Ted Nugent endorses it, and he's a Republican, so I can say that
and it's true. Right Fred?
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Clinton a standard the right is trying to meet. |
02 Jun 2004 04:40:43 AM |
|
|
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
news:430rb0lq6t2kmi779pgnb1opnqes858ntv@4ax.com:
Great Lord Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>, braving the raging
storm, scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Wed, 02 Jun 2004
01:44:19 GMT and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.
one of the main defenses put up by the Democrats was
"these Republicans did it too!".
*****.
That's a lie. You might have heard or seen that, but it was
hardly "the" or even "a" main defense.
Larry Flynt.
I see.
And what position did Larry Flynt hold in the government at the time?
Or was he employed by the Democratic National Committee?
Or was he just a renowned loudmouth speaking on his own?
And did the Democrats endorse his charges after he made them?
Did you know that the GOP endorses killing bald eagles? Really!
Do they really?
Well, Ted Nugent endorses it, and he's a Republican, so I can say that
and it's true. Right Fred?
Nice strawman.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil?
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Clinton a standard the right is trying to meet. |
02 Jun 2004 05:01:53 AM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
And did the Democrats endorse his charges after he made them?
Why would you ask if you had a leg to stand on, and could merely
provide the URL to the endorsement?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Clinton a standard the right is trying to meet. |
02 Jun 2004 05:45:08 AM |
|
|
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in news:lJ-dnTHO_9H2OSDdRVn-
jA@comcast.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
And did the Democrats endorse his charges after he made them?
Why would you ask if you had a leg to stand on, and could merely
provide the URL to the endorsement?
Why would you ask if you had a leg to stand on, and could merely provide
the URL to their disavowal?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil?
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Clinton a standard the right is trying to meet. |
02 Jun 2004 07:31:01 AM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
And did the Democrats endorse his charges after he made them?
Why would you ask if you had a leg to stand on, and could merely
provide the URL to the endorsement?
Why would you ask if you had a leg to stand on, and could merely
provide the URL to their disavowal?
Deep in the throws of your insanity, having now decided that to not
disavow is to endorse, could you please provide us with the URL
to the official GOP statement in which they disavow rape?
Going by your argument (if I may call it that), you have just proven
that the Republican party endorses rape.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Clinton a standard the right is trying to meet. |
02 Jun 2004 08:40:13 AM |
|
|
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in news:s-udnR3hk-
7CWiDd4p2dnA@comcast.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
And did the Democrats endorse his charges after he made them?
Why would you ask if you had a leg to stand on, and could merely
provide the URL to the endorsement?
Why would you ask if you had a leg to stand on, and could merely
provide the URL to their disavowal?
Deep in the throws of your insanity, having now decided that to not
disavow is to endorse, could you please provide us with the URL
to the official GOP statement in which they disavow rape?
Going by your argument (if I may call it that), you have just proven
that the Republican party endorses rape.
Going by your argument, since you didn't provide the URL in which they
endorse rape, you don't have a leg to stand on.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil?
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Clinton a standard the right is trying to meet. |
02 Jun 2004 09:12:57 AM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
Deep in the throws of your insanity, having now decided that to not
disavow is to endorse, could you please provide us with the URL
to the official GOP statement in which they disavow rape?
Going by your argument (if I may call it that), you have just proven
that the Republican party endorses rape.
Going by your argument, since you didn't provide the URL in which they
endorse rape, you don't have a leg to stand on.
So once again we find you refuting your very own position.
I'm not surprised.
I mean, it's not like it usually takes a long time for you to completely
smear your own credibility...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Clinton a standard the right is trying to meet. |
02 Jun 2004 09:49:23 AM |
|
|
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:To6dnXaqh_jfQiDdRVn-tA@comcast.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
Deep in the throws of your insanity, having now decided that to not
disavow is to endorse, could you please provide us with the URL
to the official GOP statement in which they disavow rape?
Going by your argument (if I may call it that), you have just
proven that the Republican party endorses rape.
Going by your argument, since you didn't provide the URL in which
they endorse rape, you don't have a leg to stand on.
So once again we find you refuting your very own position.
I'm not surprised.
I mean, it's not like it usually takes a long time for you to
completely smear your own credibility...
Ahh, good old JTEM, proclaiming victory as he's hanging from his own
rope.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil?
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Clinton a standard the right is trying to meet. |
02 Jun 2004 10:37:31 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
Ahh, good old JTEM, proclaiming victory as he's hanging from his own
rope.
Um, "Fred," you realize you claimed that to not disavow is to endorse.
Then when I pointed out that the RNC has never "disavowed" rape,
you announce victory and that I have just hung myself by my own rope.
You're a moron.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Clinton a standard the right is trying to meet. |
03 Jun 2004 06:12:12 AM |
|
|
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:H7OdncHwvMlPBiPd4p2dnA@comcast.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
Ahh, good old JTEM, proclaiming victory as he's hanging from his own
rope.
Um, "Fred," you realize you claimed that to not disavow is to endorse.
Then when I pointed out that the RNC has never "disavowed" rape,
you announce victory and that I have just hung myself by my own rope.
You're a moron.
Nicely snipped context there, JTEM. Anybody who can follow the thread can
see where you hung yourself.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil?
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Clinton a standard the right is trying to meet. |
03 Jun 2004 10:44:19 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
Um, "Fred," you realize you claimed that to not disavow is to
endorse. Then when I pointed out that the RNC has never
"disavowed" rape, you announce victory and that I have
just hung myself by my own rope.
Nicely snipped context there, JTEM.
There is no "snipped context." Is was as I stated. But, I'm not
suprised that you'd feel it necessary to flee from your own
position.
Twat.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Clinton a standard the right is trying to meet. |
04 Jun 2004 07:44:33 AM |
|
|
"JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:hpmdnYInf5l2cyLdRVn_iw@comcast.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
Um, "Fred," you realize you claimed that to not disavow is to
endorse. Then when I pointed out that the RNC has never
"disavowed" rape, you announce victory and that I have
just hung myself by my own rope.
Nicely snipped context there, JTEM.
There is no "snipped context." Is was as I stated. But, I'm not
suprised that you'd feel it necessary to flee from your own
position.
Make up strawmen all you like, JTEM. All I did was to parrot your own
"logic" back at you until you hung yourself with it. The terms I used in
the process were irrelevant.
Twat.
Snip-and-run idiot.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil?
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Clinton a standard the right is trying to meet. |
04 Jun 2004 12:50:49 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
There is no "snipped context." Is was as I stated. But, I'm not
suprised that you'd feel it necessary to flee from your own
position.
Make
...your mother happy? But, how? Other than to drown you in
a vat of urine, that is?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Clinton a standard the right is trying to meet. |
02 Jun 2004 10:51:50 AM |
|
|
Great Lord Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>, braving the raging
storm, scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Wed, 02 Jun 2004
10:45:08 GMT and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.
Why would you ask if you had a leg to stand on, and could merely provide
the URL to their disavowal?
OK, you do the same for the GOP's disavowel of Ted Nugent.
Fred, the political parties do not spend all day endorsing and denying
the comments of 300 million Americans. I'm a Democrat. I could go
out and state that George Bush is a cowardly cretin who has Fick
Cheney's hand up his *****. The DNC wouldn't even notice me. We're I
rock star and said the same thing, the DNC wouldn't care. Were I
Congressman Berry (D - San Jose), hell yes they's notice.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Clinton a standard the right is trying to meet. |
02 Jun 2004 12:06:10 PM |
|
|
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
news:fotrb01llgkt1t59uotmr4j38v9c22eb07@4ax.com:
Great Lord Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>, braving the raging
storm, scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Wed, 02 Jun 2004
10:45:08 GMT and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.
Why would you ask if you had a leg to stand on, and could merely
provide the URL to their disavowal?
OK, you do the same for the GOP's disavowel of Ted Nugent.
Spare me the neatly snipped ding-dong defense of JTEM the ding-dong.
Fred, the political parties do not spend all day endorsing and denying
the comments of 300 million Americans. I'm a Democrat. I could go
out and state that George Bush is a cowardly cretin who has Fick
Cheney's hand up his *****. The DNC wouldn't even notice me. We're I
rock star and said the same thing, the DNC wouldn't care. Were I
Congressman Berry (D - San Jose), hell yes they's notice.
You know perfectly well that the DNC leapt upon those Republican's
floozies like a pack of wolves after Flynt's offer brought them to
light. He did the same stupid thing to Ahnuld, remember?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Clinton a standard the right is trying to meet. |
02 Jun 2004 11:16:41 PM |
|
|
Great Lord Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>, braving the raging
storm, scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Wed, 02 Jun 2004
17:06:10 GMT and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
news:fotrb01llgkt1t59uotmr4j38v9c22eb07@4ax.com:
OK, you do the same for the GOP's disavowel of Ted Nugent.
Spare me the neatly snipped ding-dong defense of JTEM the ding-dong.
Spare me your refusal to back up your own arguments.
Fred, the political parties do not spend all day endorsing and denying
the comments of 300 million Americans. I'm a Democrat. I could go
out and state that George Bush is a cowardly cretin who has Fick
Cheney's hand up his *****. The DNC wouldn't even notice me. We're I
rock star and said the same thing, the DNC wouldn't care. Were I
Congressman Berry (D - San Jose), hell yes they's notice.
You know perfectly well that the DNC leapt upon those Republican's
floozies like a pack of wolves after Flynt's offer brought them to
light. He did the same stupid thing to Ahnuld, remember?
Right. When they were both running for Governor of California.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Clinton a standard the right is trying to meet. |
02 Jun 2004 10:48:19 AM |
|
|
Great Lord Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>, braving the raging
storm, scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Wed, 02 Jun 2004
09:40:43 GMT and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
news:430rb0lq6t2kmi779pgnb1opnqes858ntv@4ax.com:
I see.
And what position did Larry Flynt hold in the government at the time?
Or was he employed by the Democratic National Committee?
Or was he just a renowned loudmouth speaking on his own?
And did the Democrats endorse his charges after he made them?
Care to answer my question? What position did Larry Flynt hold?
Did you know that the GOP endorses killing bald eagles? Really!
Do they really?
Well, Ted Nugent endorses it, and he's a Republican, so I can say that
and it's true. Right Fred?
Nice strawman.
No, the same claim as you. "X party said this" when actually it was
person Y, who happens to be a member of X.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Clinton a standard the right is trying to meet. |
02 Jun 2004 12:08:14 PM |
|
|
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
news:kktrb01509c2m9cl1ifk69mot4tidhhm02@4ax.com:
Great Lord Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>, braving the raging
storm, scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Wed, 02 Jun 2004
09:40:43 GMT and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
news:430rb0lq6t2kmi779pgnb1opnqes858ntv@4ax.com:
I see.
And what position did Larry Flynt hold in the government at the
time? Or was he employed by the Democratic National Committee?
Or was he just a renowned loudmouth speaking on his own?
And did the Democrats endorse his charges after he made them?
Care to answer my question? What position did Larry Flynt hold?
Bait. And when some floozie stepped forward to claim that bait, the DNC
leapt on her story like flies on *****.
Did you know that the GOP endorses killing bald eagles? Really!
Do they really?
Well, Ted Nugent endorses it, and he's a Republican, so I can say
that and it's true. Right Fred?
Nice strawman.
No, the same claim as you. "X party said this" when actually it was
person Y, who happens to be a member of X.
Party X took Flynt's floozie up on the deal after his $$ brought her in.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Clinton a standard the right is trying to meet. |
02 Jun 2004 06:42:57 PM |
|
|
Great Lord Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>, braving the raging
storm, scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Wed, 02 Jun 2004
17:08:14 GMT and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
news:kktrb01509c2m9cl1ifk69mot4tidhhm02@4ax.com:
Care to answer my question? What position did Larry Flynt hold?
Bait. And when some floozie stepped forward to claim that bait, the DNC
leapt on her story like flies on *****.
"Some floozie" Geem I guess when a Domocrat does it, it's a poor
innocent girl, but a GOPer? She's a floozie who probably was asking
for it.
You sicken me.
So.. you admit that it wasn't Flynt who made the charges, but women
who actually had been in the same position under Republicans? (choice
of words intentional.)
Gosh, God forbid Larry Flynt use his resources to expose hypocracy!
No, the same claim as you. "X party said this" when actually it was
person Y, who happens to be a member of X.
Party X took Flynt's floozie up on the deal after his $$ brought her in.
And who paid for Paula's lawyers, hotels, and nose job again?
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Clinton a standard the right is trying to meet. |
02 Jun 2004 07:00:03 PM |
|
|
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
news:tbpsb0lhip6hup3n36gavct5jregftb43u@4ax.com:
Great Lord Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>, braving the raging
storm, scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Wed, 02 Jun 2004
17:08:14 GMT and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
news:kktrb01509c2m9cl1ifk69mot4tidhhm02@4ax.com:
Care to answer my question? What position did Larry Flynt hold?
Bait. And when some floozie stepped forward to claim that bait, the
DNC leapt on her story like flies on *****.
"Some floozie" Geem I guess when a Domocrat does it, it's a poor
innocent girl, but a GOPer? She's a floozie who probably was asking
for it.
You sicken me.
Oh please, you toss labels around with abandon when it suits you, so
spare me the phony outrage.
So.. you admit that it wasn't Flynt who made the charges, but women
who actually had been in the same position under Republicans? (choice
of words intentional.)
Gosh, God forbid Larry Flynt use his resources to expose hypocracy!
So you admit that the Democrats were explicitly using the "you
hypocrites" defense on Clinton's behalf?
No, the same claim as you. "X party said this" when actually it was
person Y, who happens to be a member of X.
Party X took Flynt's floozie up on the deal after his $$ brought her
in.
And who paid for Paula's lawyers, hotels, and nose job again?
That was *after* she made the original charges. She didn't come forward
to collect some bounty.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Clinton a standard the right is trying to meet. |
02 Jun 2004 11:21:34 PM |
|
|
Great Lord Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>, braving the raging
storm, scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Thu, 03 Jun 2004
00:00:03 GMT and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
news:tbpsb0lhip6hup3n36gavct5jregftb43u@4ax.com:
You sicken me.
Oh please, you toss labels around with abandon when it suits you, so
spare me the phony outrage.
Really? When have I done that? I call people "nutjobs."
Gosh, God forbid Larry Flynt use his resources to expose hypocracy!
So you admit that the Democrats were explicitly using the "you
hypocrites" defense on Clinton's behalf?
No, a *private citizen* named Larry Flynt used his own resources to
dig up dirt. This isn't the Third Recih, we don't carry around Party
IDs.
And who paid for Paula's lawyers, hotels, and nose job again?
That was *after* she made the original charges. She didn't come forward
to collect some bounty.
As far as we know.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eris" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Clinton a standard the right is trying to meet. |
02 Jun 2004 07:25:21 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 00:00:03 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
news:tbpsb0lhip6hup3n36gavct5jregftb43u@4ax.com:
Great Lord Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>, braving the raging
storm, scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Wed, 02 Jun 2004
17:08:14 GMT and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.
Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in
news:kktrb01509c2m9cl1ifk69mot4tidhhm02@4ax.com:
Care to answer my question? What position did Larry Flynt hold?
Bait. And when some floozie stepped forward to claim that bait, the
DNC leapt on her story like flies on *****.
"Some floozie" Geem I guess when a Domocrat does it, it's a poor
innocent girl, but a GOPer? She's a floozie who probably was asking
for it.
You sicken me.
Oh please, you toss labels around with abandon when it suits you, so
spare me the phony outrage.
So.. you admit that it wasn't Flynt who made the charges, but women
who actually had been in the same position under Republicans? (choice
of words intentional.)
Gosh, God forbid Larry Flynt use his resources to expose hypocracy!
So you admit that the Democrats were explicitly using the "you
hypocrites" defense on Clinton's behalf?
No, the same claim as you. "X party said this" when actually it was
person Y, who happens to be a member of X.
Party X took Flynt's floozie up on the deal after his $$ brought her
in.
And who paid for Paula's lawyers, hotels, and nose job again?
That was *after* she made the original charges. She didn't come forward
to collect some bounty.
She said, after the whole thing died down that she had been used by
the right wing. I still remember her driving away from reporters in
someone's Mercedes Benz to workout at someone's club.
I never understood the charge that Clinton dropped his pants and asked
Paula to kiss it. Clinton has been portrayed by the right as a real
ladies man. I don't think that approach would work even with Paula, in
fact I think Paula probably was delighted to have sex with the
Governor himself.
Remember the, according to right wingers, dirty ***** who force
Paula to pose topless? Remember Paula's Playboy spread? Remember brave
little Paula fighting Tanya Harding on that reality TV show. Yup name
something that Paula wouldn't do for money.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Clinton a standard the right is trying to meet. |
01 Jun 2004 09:17:04 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 01 Jun 2004 20:25:30 -0400 in episode
<rNudnQNjUdrOgCDdRVn-gw@comcast.com> we saw our hero "JTEM"
<gymraven@hotmail.com>:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote
When Clinton was accused of sexual harrassment
Pure slander.
and adultery
So what?
one of the main defenses put up by the Democrats was "these Republicans
did it too!".
*****.
That's a lie. You might have heard or seen that, but it was hardly "the"
or even "a" main defense.
The fact was that it didn't matter. It was irrelevant. It's not a crime to
be a bad President, and there's no excuse for the "Whitewater"
investigator even looking into it.
Hm, let's see...
Back then we were at relative peace, had a booming economy, and a budget
surplus. But a president who couldn't keeps his pants zipped.
Now we have a president that appears to keep his pants zipped. But we're
at war, have an economy with a job market worse than anything seen since
the great depression itself, and a budget deficit that is reaching record
numbers.
Which would I prefer?
Hm.
Boy, hard choice huh?
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"I think it's the worst kept secret in Washington.
That everybody - everybody I talk to in Washington
has known and fully knows what [the neo-conservative]
agenda was and what they were trying to do."
[Retired General Anthony Zinni]
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Clinton a standard the right is trying to meet. |
01 Jun 2004 09:55:12 PM |
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <y@hoo.com-amikchi> wrote
Hm, let's see...
Back then we were at relative peace, had a booming economy,
and a budget surplus. But a president who couldn't keeps his
pants zipped.
If one ***** in 8 years qualifies as "Can't keep your pants zipped."
Now we have a president that appears to keep his pants zipped.
"Appears."
But we're at war, have an economy with a job market worse than
anything seen since the great depression itself, and a budget
deficit that is reaching record numbers.
I try to laugh, but I caught the Mclaughlin Group on PBS. All the
regular Bushbots were peeing themselves with delight over the
latest economic figures (published by the same people who've
been caught red-handed inventing economic figures) showing that
Bush is only 1.6 million jobs away from a net gain of *Zero*
jobs in four years. Another 1.6 million jobs created and that'll
mean the country has had a net gain of *Zero* jobs for Bush's
four years.
Never mind the people who were already unemployed, or the
100,000 jobs a month they had to create to cover the people
entering the work force. Never mind the 4.4 million looking
for jobs but not counted as unemployed because they're working
part-time (without benefits) to stay alive. Never mind the millions
of elderly that are trying to re-enter the work force because they
can't afford to live on pensions and pay for drugs.
Which would I prefer?
I'd trade all of Bush's "Success" to have the WTC back.
Hm.
Boy, hard choice huh?
More like "Hard to stomach."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Clinton a standard the right is trying to meet. |
01 Jun 2004 10:25:35 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 01 Jun 2004 22:55:12 -0400 in episode
<GtWdnaGh-P_03SDd4p2dnA@comcast.com> we saw our hero "JTEM"
<gymraven@hotmail.com>:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <y@hoo.com-amikchi> wrote
Hm, let's see...
Back then we were at relative peace, had a booming economy, and a budget
surplus. But a president who couldn't keeps his pants zipped.
If one ***** in 8 years qualifies as "Can't keep your pants zipped."
Well, let's grant he was a promiscuous lech as they try to style it. I'm
trying to figure out just how upset to be over it. As opposed to, oh,
being misled right into a war, the budget going utterly out of control,
the economy going into the toilet...
Now we have a president that appears to keep his pants zipped.
"Appears."
But we're at war, have an economy with a job market worse than anything
seen since the great depression itself, and a budget deficit that is
reaching record numbers.
I try to laugh, but I caught the Mclaughlin Group on PBS. All the regular
Bushbots were peeing themselves with delight over the latest economic
figures (published by the same people who've been caught red-handed
inventing economic figures) showing that Bush is only 1.6 million jobs
away from a net gain of *Zero* jobs in four years. Another 1.6 million
jobs created and that'll mean the country has had a net gain of *Zero*
jobs for Bush's four years.
Yes. Think of it. His inspiring goal he could accomplish by election time
is to just not be the second coming of Herbert Hoover. Awesome ain't it?
Never mind the people who were already unemployed, or the 100,000 jobs a
month they had to create to cover the people entering the work force.
Never mind the 4.4 million looking for jobs but not counted as unemployed
because they're working part-time (without benefits) to stay alive. Never
mind the millions of elderly that are trying to re-enter the work force
because they can't afford to live on pensions and pay for drugs.
I see we're back to a labor force participation level that is about what
it was when his daddy was in office.
We really got a second helping. I remember telling people "remember what
happened last time you put one of those idiots in the White House?" It's
amazing to me how much we went right back to the Bush years. Another war
with Iraq. Another recession with a jobless recovery. The deficit is back
out of control. Congressional spending increases are back in the double
digits. Damn near eerie.
Which would I prefer?
I'd trade all of Bush's "Success" to have the WTC back.
Hm.
Boy, hard choice huh?
More like "Hard to stomach."
You know, I never liked Clinton. I really, really did not like that man.
I will *always hate Bush Jr. for making me miss him...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"I think it's the worst kept secret in Washington.
That everybody - everybody I talk to in Washington
has known and fully knows what [the neo-conservative]
agenda was and what they were trying to do."
[Retired General Anthony Zinni]
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eris" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Clinton a standard the right is trying to meet. |
01 Jun 2004 10:31:10 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 01 Jun 2004 22:25:35 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<y@hoo.com-amikchi> wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jun 2004 22:55:12 -0400 in episode
<GtWdnaGh-P_03SDd4p2dnA@comcast.com> we saw our hero "JTEM"
<gymraven@hotmail.com>:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <y@hoo.com-amikchi> wrote
Hm, let's see...
Back then we were at relative peace, had a booming economy, and a budget
surplus. But a president who couldn't keeps his pants zipped.
If one ***** in 8 years qualifies as "Can't keep your pants zipped."
Well, let's grant he was a promiscuous lech as they try to style it. I'm
trying to figure out just how upset to be over it. As opposed to, oh,
being misled right into a war, the budget going utterly out of control,
the economy going into the toilet...
Now we have a president that appears to keep his pants zipped.
"Appears."
But we're at war, have an economy with a job market worse than anything
seen since the great depression itself, and a budget deficit that is
reaching record numbers.
I try to laugh, but I caught the Mclaughlin Group on PBS. All the regular
Bushbots were peeing themselves with delight over the latest economic
figures (published by the same people who've been caught red-handed
inventing economic figures) showing that Bush is only 1.6 million jobs
away from a net gain of *Zero* jobs in four years. Another 1.6 million
jobs created and that'll mean the country has had a net gain of *Zero*
jobs for Bush's four years.
Yes. Think of it. His inspiring goal he could accomplish by election time
is to just not be the second coming of Herbert Hoover. Awesome ain't it?
Never mind the people who were already unemployed, or the 100,000 jobs a
month they had to create to cover the people entering the work force.
Never mind the 4.4 million looking for jobs but not counted as unemployed
because they're working part-time (without benefits) to stay alive. Never
mind the millions of elderly that are trying to re-enter the work force
because they can't afford to live on pensions and pay for drugs.
I see we're back to a labor force participation level that is about what
it was when his daddy was in office.
We really got a second helping. I remember telling people "remember what
happened last time you put one of those idiots in the White House?" It's
amazing to me how much we went right back to the Bush years. Another war
with Iraq. Another recession with a jobless recovery. The deficit is back
out of control. Congressional spending increases are back in the double
digits. Damn near eerie.
I am under the impression that all of Bushes advisors are from daddy's
administration. The only one different is the President.
Which would I prefer?
I'd trade all of Bush's "Success" to have the WTC back.
Hm.
Boy, hard choice huh?
More like "Hard to stomach."
You know, I never liked Clinton. I really, really did not like that man.
I will *always hate Bush Jr. for making me miss him...
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
