| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Fred Stone" |
| Date: |
13 Mar 2007 11:22:38 AM |
| Object: |
Bill Maher - Democrats Are Pussies |
http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/13/video-maher-calls-dems-wussies-for-
pulling-out-of-fox-debate/
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"The one thing we must not do is to confuse the real country of Iraq, where
there is a real war, a real population, and a real obligation to protect
them, with the parallel-universe "quagmire Iraq" of popular imagination."
.
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Maher - Democrats Are Pussies |
13 Mar 2007 05:19:25 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
[---snip---]
Hey, everyone, "Fred Stone" agrees with Bill Maher, who
says that we would have been better off returning Saddam
to power!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "tirebiter" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Maher - Democrats Are Pussies |
13 Mar 2007 12:43:18 PM |
|
|
On Mar 13, 11:22 am, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/13/video-maher-calls-dems-wussies-...
pulling-out-of-fox-debate/
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"The one thing we must not do is to confuse the real country of Iraq, where
there is a real war, a real population, and a real obligation to protect
them, with the parallel-universe "quagmire Iraq" of popular imagination."
Well, since democrats aren't republicans, and don't need somebody else
to think for them, or that any one person speaks for all of them, I
think Bill Maher can think and say anything he wants and the rest of
us will continue with our lives just fine.
I personally don't think that Fox is a legitimate news agency, and the
democrats would do well to ignore it completely. I won't be surprised
or upset if it doesn't work out that way however.
The Nevada debate was a bad idea, and it's for the best that it has
been canceled.
---
a.a. #2273
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Maher - Democrats Are Pussies |
13 Mar 2007 01:00:17 PM |
|
|
"tirebiter" <dontspamme666@bigfoot.com> wrote in
news:1173807798.299246.149030@t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 13, 11:22 am, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/13/video-maher-calls-dems-
wussies-.
.. pulling-out-of-fox-debate/
Well, since democrats aren't republicans, and don't need somebody else
to think for them, or that any one person speaks for all of them, I
think Bill Maher can think and say anything he wants and the rest of
us will continue with our lives just fine.
Since it seems that the Kos Kiddies are doing all the thinking for the
Democrats nowadays, you might want to revise your statement a bit.
I personally don't think that Fox is a legitimate news agency, and the
democrats would do well to ignore it completely. I won't be surprised
or upset if it doesn't work out that way however.
The Nevada debate was a bad idea, and it's for the best that it has
been canceled.
Keep saying that to yourself.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"The one thing we must not do is to confuse the real country of Iraq,
where there is a real war, a real population, and a real obligation to
protect them, with the parallel-universe "quagmire Iraq" of popular
imagination."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Maher - Democrats Are Pussies |
13 Mar 2007 01:36:58 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98F28F13EFEAEfreddybear@194.177.96.26...
"tirebiter" <dontspamme666@bigfoot.com> wrote in
news:1173807798.299246.149030@t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 13, 11:22 am, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/13/video-maher-calls-dems-
wussies-.
.. pulling-out-of-fox-debate/
Well, since democrats aren't republicans, and don't need somebody else
to think for them, or that any one person speaks for all of them, I
think Bill Maher can think and say anything he wants and the rest of
us will continue with our lives just fine.
Since it seems that the Kos Kiddies are doing all the thinking for the
Democrats nowadays, you might want to revise your statement a bit.
Why? Just to match your strawman?
No thanks.
I personally don't think that Fox is a legitimate news agency, and the
democrats would do well to ignore it completely. I won't be surprised
or upset if it doesn't work out that way however.
The Nevada debate was a bad idea, and it's for the best that it has
been canceled.
Keep saying that to yourself.
No, unlike you, he only has to say it once to remember it.
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http//www.io.com/~dloubet
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Maher - Democrats Are Pussies |
13 Mar 2007 04:41:53 PM |
|
|
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:bdmdnd_k5PzacmvYnZ2dnUVZ_hWdnZ2d@io.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98F28F13EFEAEfreddybear@194.177.96.26...
"tirebiter" <dontspamme666@bigfoot.com> wrote in
news:1173807798.299246.149030@t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 13, 11:22 am, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/13/video-maher-calls-dems-
wussies-.
.. pulling-out-of-fox-debate/
Well, since democrats aren't republicans, and don't need somebody
else to think for them, or that any one person speaks for all of
them, I think Bill Maher can think and say anything he wants and the
rest of us will continue with our lives just fine.
Since it seems that the Kos Kiddies are doing all the thinking for
the Democrats nowadays, you might want to revise your statement a
bit.
Why? Just to match your strawman?
No thanks.
I personally don't think that Fox is a legitimate news agency, and
the democrats would do well to ignore it completely. I won't be
surprised or upset if it doesn't work out that way however.
The Nevada debate was a bad idea, and it's for the best that it has
been canceled.
Keep saying that to yourself.
No, unlike you, he only has to say it once to remember it.
I was hoping against hope that it would take more than one rep for him
to *convince himself*.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"The one thing we must not do is to confuse the real country of Iraq,
where there is a real war, a real population, and a real obligation to
protect them, with the parallel-universe "quagmire Iraq" of popular
imagination."
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "tirebiter" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Maher - Democrats Are Pussies |
13 Mar 2007 01:52:56 PM |
|
|
On Mar 13, 1:00 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
"tirebiter" <dontspamme...@bigfoot.com> wrote innews:1173807798.299246.149030@t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 13, 11:22 am, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/13/video-maher-calls-dems-
wussies-.
.. pulling-out-of-fox-debate/
Well, since democrats aren't republicans, and don't need somebody else
to think for them, or that any one person speaks for all of them, I
think Bill Maher can think and say anything he wants and the rest of
us will continue with our lives just fine.
Since it seems that the Kos Kiddies are doing all the thinking for the
Democrats nowadays, you might want to revise your statement a bit.
Well, lets use an example. I could think that you're an *****, and many
people might agree with me. That wouldn't make me their spokesman for
anything at all, including the determination of how much of an ***** you
really are. Contrast that with Maher saying democrats are pussies.
It doesn't make it so, and it doesn't mean anyone has to agree with
him.
Compare this to dimwitted republicans who wait for Rush Limbaugh or
Bill O'Reilly to tell them what they should think. Considering how
dim and predictable Rush and Bill are, it's a bit surprising that the
conservative sheeple hang on their every word the way they do, but
that is part of their whole mental makeup that causes them to be in
that group to start with.
I personally don't think that Fox is a legitimate news agency, and the
democrats would do well to ignore it completely. I won't be surprised
or upset if it doesn't work out that way however.
The Nevada debate was a bad idea, and it's for the best that it has
been canceled.
Keep saying that to yourself.
Naw, I've pretty much moved past that. Fox wanted to use it to
somehow legitimatize themselves as a moderate news outlet. Despite
their president making anti-democrat biased jokes on camera (real
smart), the debate format only allowed Fox talking heads to write and
ask the questions. The rejected all requests to have an evenly
balanced panel of journalists. You can imagine the "When did you stop
beating your wife?" type of questions they were planning. It was fun
to watch it blow up in Fox's face (so to speak), but now that their
hypocrisy has been exposed, yet again, there's not much more to dwell
on.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"The one thing we must not do is to confuse the real country of Iraq,
where there is a real war, a real population, and a real obligation to
protect them, with the parallel-universe "quagmire Iraq" of popular
imagination."
---
a.a. #2273
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Maher - Democrats Are Pussies |
13 Mar 2007 04:49:27 PM |
|
|
"tirebiter" <dontspamme666@bigfoot.com> wrote in
news:1173811976.488061.35020@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 13, 1:00 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
"tirebiter" <dontspamme...@bigfoot.com> wrote
innews:1173807798.299246.149030@t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 13, 11:22 am, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/13/video-maher-calls-dems-
wussies-.
.. pulling-out-of-fox-debate/
Well, since democrats aren't republicans, and don't need somebody
else to think for them, or that any one person speaks for all of
them, I think Bill Maher can think and say anything he wants and
the rest of us will continue with our lives just fine.
Since it seems that the Kos Kiddies are doing all the thinking for
the Democrats nowadays, you might want to revise your statement a
bit.
Well, lets use an example. I could think that you're an *****, and many
people might agree with me. That wouldn't make me their spokesman for
anything at all, including the determination of how much of an ***** you
really are. Contrast that with Maher saying democrats are pussies.
It doesn't make it so, and it doesn't mean anyone has to agree with
him.
Ah, but plenty of people do agree with him, at least on this, including
a lot of more sensible Democrats than you. Which is the point here.
Now of course you're welcome to dismiss the ideas of anybody who
disagrees with you, goodness, all you libruls have that down to an art,
but you might just keep it in the back of your mind when you find that
you've whittled yourselves down to nobody but the shrieking ninnies.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"The one thing we must not do is to confuse the real country of Iraq,
where there is a real war, a real population, and a real obligation to
protect them, with the parallel-universe "quagmire Iraq" of popular
imagination."
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Maher - Democrats Are Pussies |
13 Mar 2007 09:38:19 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
Now of course you're welcome to dismiss the ideas
of anybody who disagrees with you, goodness, all
you libruls have that down to an art,
Bill Maher said we would have been better off putting
Saddam back in power.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Maher - Democrats Are Pussies |
14 Mar 2007 08:20:08 AM |
|
|
"JTEM" <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote in news:1173839899.599728.175260
@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
Now of course you're welcome to dismiss the ideas
of anybody who disagrees with you, goodness, all
you libruls have that down to an art,
Bill Maher said we would have been better off putting
Saddam back in power.
So?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"The one thing we must not do is to confuse the real country of Iraq, where
there is a real war, a real population, and a real obligation to protect
them, with the parallel-universe "quagmire Iraq" of popular imagination."
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Maher - Democrats Are Pussies |
14 Mar 2007 12:42:31 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
Bill Maher said we would have been better off putting
Saddam back in power.
So?
So you either think what Bill Maher says is relevant or you
don't.
And, yeah, clearly you think it's relevant. (Psst. Check
out the first article in this thread)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Maher - Democrats Are Pussies |
14 Mar 2007 04:55:38 PM |
|
|
"JTEM" <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote in news:1173894151.591517.11120
@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
Bill Maher said we would have been better off putting
Saddam back in power.
So?
So you either think what Bill Maher says is relevant or you
don't.
False dichotomy. I can agree with *some* things he says, and disagree
with *other* things that he says. That's because I'm a smart fellow and
not a stupid jackass liberal like you.
And, yeah, clearly you think it's relevant. (Psst. Check
out the first article in this thread)
And yeah, he still thinks Democrats are pussies.
And I still agree with him on that.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"The one thing we must not do is to confuse the real country of Iraq,
where there is a real war, a real population, and a real obligation to
protect them, with the parallel-universe "quagmire Iraq" of popular
imagination."
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Maher - Democrats Are Pussies |
14 Mar 2007 05:16:45 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
And I still agree with him on that.
When he said that we'd be better off putting Saddam
back in power?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Parsifal" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Maher - Democrats Are Pussies |
13 Mar 2007 05:09:53 PM |
|
|
On 13 Mrz., 22:49, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
"tirebiter" <dontspamme...@bigfoot.com> wrote innews:1173811976.488061.35020@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 13, 1:00 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
"tirebiter" <dontspamme...@bigfoot.com> wrote
innews:1173807798.299246.149030@t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 13, 11:22 am, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/13/video-maher-calls-dems-
wussies-.
.. pulling-out-of-fox-debate/
Well, since democrats aren't republicans, and don't need somebody
else to think for them, or that any one person speaks for all of
them, I think Bill Maher can think and say anything he wants and
the rest of us will continue with our lives just fine.
Since it seems that the Kos Kiddies are doing all the thinking for
the Democrats nowadays, you might want to revise your statement a
bit.
Well, lets use an example. I could think that you're an *****, and many
people might agree with me. That wouldn't make me their spokesman for
anything at all, including the determination of how much of an ***** you
really are. Contrast that with Maher saying democrats are pussies.
It doesn't make it so, and it doesn't mean anyone has to agree with
him.
Ah, but plenty of people do agree with him, at least on this, including
a lot of more sensible Democrats than you. Which is the point here.
Now of course you're welcome to dismiss the ideas of anybody who
disagrees with you, goodness, all you libruls have that down to an art,
but you might just keep it in the back of your mind when you find that
you've whittled yourselves down to nobody but the shrieking ninnies.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"The one thing we must not do is to confuse the real country of Iraq,
where there is a real war, a real population, and a real obligation to
protect them, with the parallel-universe "quagmire Iraq" of popular
imagination."- Zitierten Text ausblenden -
- Zitierten Text anzeigen -
Would you tell me why you keep bringing these political subjects to
alt.atheism and not to, for example, alt.politics.usa where they would
be more appropriate?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Maher - Democrats Are Pussies |
13 Mar 2007 05:38:53 PM |
|
|
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1173823793.230988.254720@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com:
On 13 Mrz., 22:49, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
"tirebiter" <dontspamme...@bigfoot.com> wrote
innews:1173811976.488061.35020@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 13, 1:00 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
"tirebiter" <dontspamme...@bigfoot.com> wrote
innews:1173807798.299246.149030@t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 13, 11:22 am, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/13/video-maher-calls-dems-
wussies-.
.. pulling-out-of-fox-debate/
Well, since democrats aren't republicans, and don't need
somebody else to think for them, or that any one person speaks
for all of them, I think Bill Maher can think and say anything
he wants and the rest of us will continue with our lives just
fine.
Since it seems that the Kos Kiddies are doing all the thinking for
the Democrats nowadays, you might want to revise your statement a
bit.
Well, lets use an example. I could think that you're an *****, and
many people might agree with me. That wouldn't make me their
spokesman for anything at all, including the determination of how
much of an ***** you really are. Contrast that with Maher saying
democrats are pussies. It doesn't make it so, and it doesn't mean
anyone has to agree with him.
Ah, but plenty of people do agree with him, at least on this,
including a lot of more sensible Democrats than you. Which is the
point here.
Now of course you're welcome to dismiss the ideas of anybody who
disagrees with you, goodness, all you libruls have that down to an
art, but you might just keep it in the back of your mind when you
find that you've whittled yourselves down to nobody but the shrieking
ninnies.
Would you tell me why you keep bringing these political subjects to
alt.atheism and not to, for example, alt.politics.usa where they would
be more appropriate?
I'm not the only one who brings political subjects to alt.atheism.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"The one thing we must not do is to confuse the real country of Iraq,
where there is a real war, a real population, and a real obligation to
protect them, with the parallel-universe "quagmire Iraq" of popular
imagination."
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "tirebiter" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Maher - Democrats Are Pussies |
13 Mar 2007 05:37:13 PM |
|
|
On Mar 13, 4:49 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
"tirebiter" <dontspamme...@bigfoot.com> wrote innews:1173811976.488061.35020@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 13, 1:00 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
"tirebiter" <dontspamme...@bigfoot.com> wrote
innews:1173807798.299246.149030@t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 13, 11:22 am, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/13/video-maher-calls-dems-
wussies-.
.. pulling-out-of-fox-debate/
Well, since democrats aren't republicans, and don't need somebody
else to think for them, or that any one person speaks for all of
them, I think Bill Maher can think and say anything he wants and
the rest of us will continue with our lives just fine.
Since it seems that the Kos Kiddies are doing all the thinking for
the Democrats nowadays, you might want to revise your statement a
bit.
Well, lets use an example. I could think that you're an *****, and many
people might agree with me. That wouldn't make me their spokesman for
anything at all, including the determination of how much of an ***** you
really are. Contrast that with Maher saying democrats are pussies.
It doesn't make it so, and it doesn't mean anyone has to agree with
him.
Ah, but plenty of people do agree with him, at least on this, including
a lot of more sensible Democrats than you. Which is the point here.
Glad to see you're such a fan of Bill Maher. I expect you'll be
agreeing with everything he has ever, or will ever say.
Now of course you're welcome to dismiss the ideas of anybody who
disagrees with you, goodness, all you libruls have that down to an art,
but you might just keep it in the back of your mind when you find that
you've whittled yourselves down to nobody but the shrieking ninnies.
Here's how agreeing/disagreeing works. If somebody's ideas are
compatible with yours, you agree with them, if not you disagree with
them. I'm surprised you're having comprehension problems with it,
since you seem pretty used to dismissing people you disagree with.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"The one thing we must not do is to confuse the real country of Iraq,
where there is a real war, a real population, and a real obligation to
protect them, with the parallel-universe "quagmire Iraq" of popular
imagination."
---
a.a. #2273
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Maher - Democrats Are Pussies |
13 Mar 2007 07:20:19 PM |
|
|
"tirebiter" <dontspamme666@bigfoot.com> wrote in
news:1173825433.446131.40990@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 13, 4:49 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
"tirebiter" <dontspamme...@bigfoot.com> wrote
innews:1173811976.488061.35020@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 13, 1:00 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
"tirebiter" <dontspamme...@bigfoot.com> wrote
innews:1173807798.299246.149030@t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 13, 11:22 am, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/13/video-maher-calls-dems-
wussies-.
.. pulling-out-of-fox-debate/
Well, since democrats aren't republicans, and don't need
somebody else to think for them, or that any one person speaks
for all of them, I think Bill Maher can think and say anything
he wants and the rest of us will continue with our lives just
fine.
Since it seems that the Kos Kiddies are doing all the thinking for
the Democrats nowadays, you might want to revise your statement a
bit.
Well, lets use an example. I could think that you're an *****, and
many people might agree with me. That wouldn't make me their
spokesman for anything at all, including the determination of how
much of an ***** you really are. Contrast that with Maher saying
democrats are pussies. It doesn't make it so, and it doesn't mean
anyone has to agree with him.
Ah, but plenty of people do agree with him, at least on this,
including a lot of more sensible Democrats than you. Which is the
point here.
Glad to see you're such a fan of Bill Maher. I expect you'll be
agreeing with everything he has ever, or will ever say.
I don't agree with everything that anybody says, without thinking about
it for myself.
Now of course you're welcome to dismiss the ideas of anybody who
disagrees with you, goodness, all you libruls have that down to an
art, but you might just keep it in the back of your mind when you
find that you've whittled yourselves down to nobody but the shrieking
ninnies.
Here's how agreeing/disagreeing works. If somebody's ideas are
compatible with yours, you agree with them, if not you disagree with
them. I'm surprised you're having comprehension problems with it,
since you seem pretty used to dismissing people you disagree with.
Since you're so good at diagnosing me over the Internet, maybe you could
tell me what this pain is in my neck?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"The one thing we must not do is to confuse the real country of Iraq,
where there is a real war, a real population, and a real obligation to
protect them, with the parallel-universe "quagmire Iraq" of popular
imagination."
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Hatter" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill Maher - Democrats Are Pussies |
13 Mar 2007 02:01:48 PM |
|
|
On Mar 13, 2:52 pm, "tirebiter" <dontspamme...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
On Mar 13, 1:00 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:> "tirebiter" <dontspamme...@bigfoot.com> wrote innews:1173807798.299246.149030@t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 13, 11:22 am, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
http://hotair.com/archives/2007/03/13/video-maher-calls-dems-
wussies-.
.. pulling-out-of-fox-debate/
Well, since democrats aren't republicans, and don't need somebody else
to think for them, or that any one person speaks for all of them, I
think Bill Maher can think and say anything he wants and the rest of
us will continue with our lives just fine.
Since it seems that the Kos Kiddies are doing all the thinking for the
Democrats nowadays, you might want to revise your statement a bit.
Well, lets use an example. I could think that you're an *****, and many
people might agree with me. That wouldn't make me their spokesman for
anything at all, including the determination of how much of an ***** you
really are. Contrast that with Maher saying democrats are pussies.
It doesn't make it so, and it doesn't mean anyone has to agree with
him.
Compare this to dimwitted republicans who wait for Rush Limbaugh or
Bill O'Reilly to tell them what they should think. Considering how
dim and predictable Rush and Bill are, it's a bit surprising that the
conservative sheeple hang on their every word the way they do, but
that is part of their whole mental makeup that causes them to be in
that group to start with.
I personally don't think that Fox is a legitimate news agency, and the
democrats would do well to ignore it completely. I won't be surprised
or upset if it doesn't work out that way however.
The Nevada debate was a bad idea, and it's for the best that it has
been canceled.
Keep saying that to yourself.
Naw, I've pretty much moved past that. Fox wanted to use it to
somehow legitimatize themselves as a moderate news outlet. Despite
their president making anti-democrat biased jokes on camera (real
smart), the debate format only allowed Fox talking heads to write and
ask the questions. The rejected all requests to have an evenly
balanced panel of journalists. You can imagine the "When did you stop
beating your wife?" type of questions they were planning. It was fun
to watch it blow up in Fox's face (so to speak), but now that their
hypocrisy has been exposed, yet again, there's not much more to dwell
on.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"The one thing we must not do is to confuse the real country of Iraq,
where there is a real war, a real population, and a real obligation to
protect them, with the parallel-universe "quagmire Iraq" of popular
imagination."
---
a.a. #2273
Just once, I'd love to see a journalist ask GWB, "How much of the 2007
budget has been alloted for flag draped coffins?"
Hatter
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
