Brace for it



 Religions > Atheism > Brace for it

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 7 of 7

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "JTEM"
Date: 12 Apr 2004 10:27:56 PM
Object: Brace for it
The big auto makers are suddenly investing heavily
in small cars again.
Chevy is even retiring the Cavalier and calling its
replacement, the Cobalt, a "premium small car."
Toyota has an all-new product line, Scion, with the
little 1.5 liter engine.
I just did a little comparison shopping on pickup
trucks for the room mate, and both Toyota & GMC
appear to have removed the fuel economy ratings
for their smaller trucks with the V6.
MPG: NA
If I didn't know any better I'd say that the auto industry
isn't expecting gas prices to fall...
.

User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: Brace for it 13 Apr 2004 09:36:55 AM
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 12:29:40 +0000 in episode
<pan.2004.04.13.12.29.26.650000@remove-this.hotmail.com> we saw our hero
Brainfried <obfusc8ed@remove-this.hotmail.com>:

On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 18:31:11 +1000, Matt wrote:

Brainfried wrote:

On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 15:25:49 +1000, Matt wrote:


JTEM wrote:


The big auto makers are suddenly investing heavily in small cars
again.

Chevy is even retiring the Cavalier and calling its replacement, the
Cobalt, a "premium small car."

Toyota has an all-new product line, Scion, with the little 1.5 liter
engine.

I just did a little comparison shopping on pickup trucks for the room
mate, and both Toyota & GMC appear to have removed the fuel economy
ratings for their smaller trucks with the V6.

MPG: NA

If I didn't know any better I'd say that the auto industry isn't
expecting gas prices to fall...


But then again, the US petrol prices are still low, $1.80 a gallon,
thats around 55cents a litre. What are people over there whining about?
most people would give their first born son to get prices like that in
Australia, NZ or any other part of the globe.

Matt



It's not the fuel that's so expensive, it's the tax on the gas that
kills you.

http://www.gaspricewatch.com/gastaxes.asp

Old numbers, but you get the idea. More than 3/4 of the cost in the UK
is tax. A few years ago, they would put the tax cost on the pumps in
the US so you knew what you were paying.

In most countries, the tax is the vast majority of the cost of the
fuel. In the US, it's about 1/3 of the total cost, very low, granted we
probably get taxed in other ways to build roads and such.

So, the next time you're complaining about fuel prices, stop pointing
the finger at the oil companies and how they're evil greedy
corporations and start pointing them at your government.


True, however, in NZ for example we have ACC levy, GST or 12.5% plus a
fuel tax that is meant to, in theory, pay for the maintenance and
creation of new roads.

However, how does the US pay for the roads, do they take it out of
direct taxation; in other words, allocate a budget for the ministry of
raods out of the consolidated government coffers or is the over all road
tax a lot lower?

Matt


The money comes from a variety of places, federal, state, county, city,
etc. and funding for certain roads depends somewhat on the area the road
is to be built and type of road in question. They make all kinds of deals
and juggle money around. Additionally, taxes earmarked for one thing are
quite often used for another. They pitched the Texas Lottery as paying
for education, but in reality that money goes into the general state
coffers.

Yeah I remember when the lottery came about. I was back in Texas when the
big flap over it was going on. I love the way people fall for these "the
money will go for X" pitches. Every bit of state income is dumped into the
general treasury. Whether any particular amount goes to any particular
program depends on the discipline (HA!) of the legislature.
People shouldn't have bought that pitch unless it was written right into
the amendment that legalized the lottery...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism,
because it is a merger of State and corporate power."
- Mussolini
.
User: "Matt"

Title: Re: Brace for it 14 Apr 2004 01:01:50 AM
Mark K. Bilbo wrote:

On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 12:29:40 +0000 in episode
<pan.2004.04.13.12.29.26.650000@remove-this.hotmail.com> we saw our hero
Brainfried <obfusc8ed@remove-this.hotmail.com>:


On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 18:31:11 +1000, Matt wrote:


Brainfried wrote:


On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 15:25:49 +1000, Matt wrote:



JTEM wrote:



The big auto makers are suddenly investing heavily in small cars
again.

Chevy is even retiring the Cavalier and calling its replacement, the
Cobalt, a "premium small car."

Toyota has an all-new product line, Scion, with the little 1.5 liter
engine.

I just did a little comparison shopping on pickup trucks for the room
mate, and both Toyota & GMC appear to have removed the fuel economy
ratings for their smaller trucks with the V6.

MPG: NA

If I didn't know any better I'd say that the auto industry isn't
expecting gas prices to fall...


But then again, the US petrol prices are still low, $1.80 a gallon,
thats around 55cents a litre. What are people over there whining about?
most people would give their first born son to get prices like that in
Australia, NZ or any other part of the globe.

Matt



It's not the fuel that's so expensive, it's the tax on the gas that
kills you.

http://www.gaspricewatch.com/gastaxes.asp

Old numbers, but you get the idea. More than 3/4 of the cost in the UK
is tax. A few years ago, they would put the tax cost on the pumps in
the US so you knew what you were paying.

In most countries, the tax is the vast majority of the cost of the
fuel. In the US, it's about 1/3 of the total cost, very low, granted we
probably get taxed in other ways to build roads and such.

So, the next time you're complaining about fuel prices, stop pointing
the finger at the oil companies and how they're evil greedy
corporations and start pointing them at your government.


True, however, in NZ for example we have ACC levy, GST or 12.5% plus a
fuel tax that is meant to, in theory, pay for the maintenance and
creation of new roads.

However, how does the US pay for the roads, do they take it out of
direct taxation; in other words, allocate a budget for the ministry of
raods out of the consolidated government coffers or is the over all road
tax a lot lower?

Matt


The money comes from a variety of places, federal, state, county, city,
etc. and funding for certain roads depends somewhat on the area the road
is to be built and type of road in question. They make all kinds of deals
and juggle money around. Additionally, taxes earmarked for one thing are
quite often used for another. They pitched the Texas Lottery as paying
for education, but in reality that money goes into the general state
coffers.



Yeah I remember when the lottery came about. I was back in Texas when the
big flap over it was going on. I love the way people fall for these "the
money will go for X" pitches. Every bit of state income is dumped into the
general treasury. Whether any particular amount goes to any particular
program depends on the discipline (HA!) of the legislature.

People shouldn't have bought that pitch unless it was written right into
the amendment that legalized the lottery...

Well, in NZ we have the Lottery Commmission which (thank god) is at arms
length from the politicians. As for "fiscal discipline", it didn't start
occuring until 1990 when we had the "mother of all budgets" which made
Regean look socialist. As they say, things won't change until it get worse.
Matt
--
http://home.iprimus.com.au/matgarnz
"You don't have to live next to me, Just give me my
equality" - Nina Simone (Mississippi *****)
"Atheism is a non-prophet organisation" - Anonymous
"A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a
statistic." - Joseph Stalin
"Death solves all problems - no man, no problem." -
Joseph Stalin
"There are no morals in politics; there is only
expedience. A scoundrel may be of use to us just
because he is a scoundrel." - Vladimir Ilyich Lenin
.


User: "Daniel Kolle"

Title: Re: Brace for it 13 Apr 2004 12:01:52 PM
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 23:27:56 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
thought hard and said:

The big auto makers are suddenly investing heavily
in small cars again.

They all look ugly as hell.
My little pickup gets 25 mpg and gas is still cheap around here. $1.43
a gallon. And it actually has somewhat of an engine.
--
-Daniel "Mr. Brevity" Kolle; 16 A.A. #2035
Koji Kondo, Yo-Yo Ma, Gustav Mahler, and Krzysztof Penderecki are my Gods.
Madly Insane EAC Scientist.
.
User: "Matt"

Title: Re: Brace for it 14 Apr 2004 01:55:34 AM
Daniel Kolle wrote:

On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 23:27:56 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
thought hard and said:


The big auto makers are suddenly investing heavily
in small cars again.



They all look ugly as hell.
My little pickup gets 25 mpg and gas is still cheap around here. $1.43
a gallon. And it actually has somewhat of an engine.

Ugly as hell? you call the new BWM mini ugly? I'd hate to know what you
consider sexy!
Matt
--
http://home.iprimus.com.au/matgarnz
"You don't have to live next to me, Just give me my
equality" - Nina Simone (Mississippi *****)
"Atheism is a non-prophet organisation" - Anonymous
"A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a
statistic." - Joseph Stalin
"Death solves all problems - no man, no problem." -
Joseph Stalin
"There are no morals in politics; there is only
expedience. A scoundrel may be of use to us just
because he is a scoundrel." - Vladimir Ilyich Lenin
.
User: "Daniel Kolle"

Title: Re: Brace for it 14 Apr 2004 02:50:22 PM
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:55:34 +1000, Matt <kaiwainz@yahoo.com.au>
thought hard and said:

Daniel Kolle wrote:

On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 23:27:56 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
thought hard and said:


The big auto makers are suddenly investing heavily
in small cars again.



They all look ugly as hell.
My little pickup gets 25 mpg and gas is still cheap around here. $1.43
a gallon. And it actually has somewhat of an engine.


Ugly as hell? you call the new BWM mini ugly? I'd hate to know what you
consider sexy!

I am not really a fan of the Mini.

Matt

--
-Daniel "Mr. Brevity" Kolle; 16 A.A. #2035
Koji Kondo, Yo-Yo Ma, Gustav Mahler, and Krzysztof Penderecki are my Gods.
Madly Insane EAC Scientist.
.

User: "stoney"

Title: Re: Brace for it 16 Apr 2004 09:39:51 AM
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:55:34 +1000, Matt <kaiwainz@yahoo.com.au>,
Message ID: <c5in97$24lqu$2@ID-220941.news.uni-berlin.de> wrote in
alt.atheism;

Daniel Kolle wrote:

On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 23:27:56 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
thought hard and said:


The big auto makers are suddenly investing heavily
in small cars again.



They all look ugly as hell.
My little pickup gets 25 mpg and gas is still cheap around here. $1.43
a gallon. And it actually has somewhat of an engine.


Ugly as hell? you call the new BWM mini ugly? I'd hate to know what you
consider sexy!

Are you sure you mean BWM and not BMW?

Matt



Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.
User: "JTEM"

Title: Re: Brace for it 16 Apr 2004 01:48:22 PM
"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote

Matt <kaiwainz@yahoo.com.au>

Ugly as hell? you call the new BWM mini ugly? I'd hate to
know what you consider sexy!

Are you sure you mean BWM and not BMW?

He must, as BMW owns Cooper and is exporting the new "Maxi"
mini around the world.
It's wildly popular here, to the point that I'd warn off anyone thinking
of buying one. You'd have to be insane to spend thousands above
sticker on a British-built car that's virtually assured to break down
constantly.
.
User: "stoney"

Title: Re: Brace for it 17 Apr 2004 10:24:01 AM
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 14:48:22 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>,
Message ID: <guidnS-ar6z3tB3dRVn-ug@comcast.com> wrote in alt.atheism;


"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote

Matt <kaiwainz@yahoo.com.au>

Ugly as hell? you call the new BWM mini ugly? I'd hate to
know what you consider sexy!


Are you sure you mean BWM and not BMW?


He must, as BMW owns Cooper and is exporting the new "Maxi"
mini around the world.

It's wildly popular here, to the point that I'd warn off anyone thinking
of buying one. You'd have to be insane to spend thousands above
sticker on a British-built car that's virtually assured to break down
constantly.

/me shakes head at the stupidity of the American 'sheeple.'
"Wildly popular," imo, is an excellant indicator of what not to do.


Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.
User: "JTEM"

Title: Re: Brace for it 17 Apr 2004 05:26:49 PM
"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote

/me shakes head at the stupidity of the American 'sheeple.'
"Wildly popular," imo, is an excellant indicator of what
not to do.

It's artificially popular.
Their getting a lot of milage out of the association with BMW,
though that name doesn't actually appear anywhere on the car.
Many people are still attracted towards them as a "Cheap" BMW.
And then there's the fact that there is a market for small cars. I'm
not alone when I say that I'm turned off by the dinosaurs. Pickings
have been mighty slim lately, especially when it comes to styling.
The mini, together with the new Beatle & PC Cruiser (both pieces
of *****), are about the only small cars out there that offer anything
other than economy. In addition to styling, the mini is a real
performance demon. It's a small car for people who like small cars.
If economy is your bag, you wouldn't be spending more than $20K
on a car in the first place.
However, they are no longer alone. Toyota's new Scion line goes
for a styling statement, and Chevy's new Cobalt is a more moderate
contender (at least on the outside).
.
User: "stoney"

Title: Re: Brace for it 20 Apr 2004 09:18:05 PM
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 18:26:49 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>,
Message ID: <NNWdnaGrDYGBMxzd4p2dnA@comcast.com> wrote in alt.atheism;


"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote

/me shakes head at the stupidity of the American 'sheeple.'
"Wildly popular," imo, is an excellant indicator of what
not to do.


It's artificially popular.

as are most fads, imo.

Their getting a lot of milage out of the association with BMW,
though that name doesn't actually appear anywhere on the car.

Many people are still attracted towards them as a "Cheap" BMW.

(shakes head)

And then there's the fact that there is a market for small cars. I'm
not alone when I say that I'm turned off by the dinosaurs. Pickings
have been mighty slim lately, especially when it comes to styling.

I suspect they've pretty much run out of ideas, so they're attempting to
'make new lamps out of old.'

The mini, together with the new Beatle & PC Cruiser (both pieces
of *****), are about the only small cars out there that offer anything
other than economy.

I drove a new Beatle a couple years ago-inlaws car. Didn't care for it
at all. As for Chrysler, never again will I buy one new.

In addition to styling, the mini is a real
performance demon. It's a small car for people who like small cars.
If economy is your bag, you wouldn't be spending more than $20K
on a car in the first place.

However, they are no longer alone. Toyota's new Scion line goes
for a styling statement, and Chevy's new Cobalt is a more moderate
contender (at least on the outside).



Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.







User: "JPG"

Title: Re: Brace for it 13 Apr 2004 03:32:05 AM
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 23:27:56 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
wrote:


The big auto makers are suddenly investing heavily
in small cars again.

Chevy is even retiring the Cavalier and calling its
replacement, the Cobalt, a "premium small car."

Toyota has an all-new product line, Scion, with the
little 1.5 liter engine.

Sort of sums up the problem from the European perspective, that you
call a 1.5 litre engine "little". I don't think I have ever owned a
car with an engine that big in 35 years' driving.
When the current cost of petrol (gasoline) in the UK is 80p a litre,
or at current rates of exchange $5.20 a US gallon, I think you can see
why. Petrol is heavily taxed to conserve oil, so we are told by the
government, though I suspect that the extra tax income is welcome.
I know the majority of Americans don't like hearing this, but gasoline
in the US is far too cheap and encourages profligacy.
No doubt when the fuel crunch comes - as it will - then Americans may
think differently, but at the present time I guess any US politician
suggesting conservation by taxation is likely to be as welcome as a
turd in a swimming pool, and would not have a hope in "hell" of ever
being elected.
JPG


I just did a little comparison shopping on pickup
trucks for the room mate, and both Toyota & GMC
appear to have removed the fuel economy ratings
for their smaller trucks with the V6.

MPG: NA

If I didn't know any better I'd say that the auto industry
isn't expecting gas prices to fall...








.
User: "JTEM"

Title: Re: Brace for it 13 Apr 2004 02:44:20 PM
"JPG" <me@privacy.net> wrote

I know the majority of Americans don't like hearing this,
but gasoline in the US is far too cheap and encourages
profligacy.

Having just identified "Taxes" as a major cause for your increased
prices, and further speculating that the U.S. government does not
operate on charity, would you not conclude that your American
counterparts are paying just as much in taxes -- either directly or
indirectly through reduced services -- rather than we're somehow
geting a "free ride"?
Seriously.
Now, please, take this into account and offer us something other than
a polite "***** you, you spoiled yanks!"
And, oh, also take into account that the worlds oil market does include
the U.K.
We're not just expecting oil prices to rise significantly in this country.
The same forces at work here will be at play in the U.K. and elsewhere.
.
User: "Matt"

Title: Re: Brace for it 14 Apr 2004 01:52:48 AM
JTEM wrote:

"JPG" <me@privacy.net> wrote


I know the majority of Americans don't like hearing this,
but gasoline in the US is far too cheap and encourages
profligacy.



Having just identified "Taxes" as a major cause for your increased
prices, and further speculating that the U.S. government does not
operate on charity, would you not conclude that your American
counterparts are paying just as much in taxes -- either directly or
indirectly through reduced services -- rather than we're somehow
geting a "free ride"?

Seriously.

Now, please, take this into account and offer us something other than
a polite "***** you, you spoiled yanks!"

And, oh, also take into account that the worlds oil market does include
the U.K.

We're not just expecting oil prices to rise significantly in this country.
The same forces at work here will be at play in the U.K. and elsewhere.

Yes, but we never see people in the "evil overseas" demanding that the
government should invade some miscellaneous middle east country to
ensure a nice and plentiful supply of oil is maintained. We accept the
price rises as "***** happens" where as when I hear the Americans whinge
its as though someone has taken something alway from them that they love.
Matt
--
http://home.iprimus.com.au/matgarnz
"You don't have to live next to me, Just give me my
equality" - Nina Simone (Mississippi *****)
"Atheism is a non-prophet organisation" - Anonymous
"A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a
statistic." - Joseph Stalin
"Death solves all problems - no man, no problem." -
Joseph Stalin
"There are no morals in politics; there is only
expedience. A scoundrel may be of use to us just
because he is a scoundrel." - Vladimir Ilyich Lenin
.
User: "Brainfried"

Title: Re: Brace for it 15 Apr 2004 08:09:36 AM
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:52:48 +1000, Matt wrote:

JTEM wrote:

"JPG" <me@privacy.net> wrote


I know the majority of Americans don't like hearing this, but gasoline
in the US is far too cheap and encourages profligacy.



Having just identified "Taxes" as a major cause for your increased
prices, and further speculating that the U.S. government does not
operate on charity, would you not conclude that your American
counterparts are paying just as much in taxes -- either directly or
indirectly through reduced services -- rather than we're somehow geting
a "free ride"?

Seriously.

Now, please, take this into account and offer us something other than a
polite "***** you, you spoiled yanks!"

And, oh, also take into account that the worlds oil market does include
the U.K.

We're not just expecting oil prices to rise significantly in this
country. The same forces at work here will be at play in the U.K. and
elsewhere.


Yes, but we never see people in the "evil overseas" demanding that the
government should invade some miscellaneous middle east country to
ensure a nice and plentiful supply of oil is maintained. We accept the
price rises as "***** happens" where as when I hear the Americans whinge
its as though someone has taken something alway from them that they
love.

Matt

Oil?
What we have is Bush on a holy crusade. Call a spade a spade.
If it were about oil, we'd just buy it. Who do you think really controls
oil, the supplier or the buyer? Oil is worthless without a buyer. It's
just a bunch of sludge in the ground. Granted, purchasing that oil gave
money to a brutal dictator, but not buying it really only hurt the people
of Iraq as ***** rolls down hill.
Wars cost a lot of money. If it were about oil, we should have just
bought it. It's a lot cheaper that way.
Iraq has the world's second largest oil reserves. Buying oil from Iraq
would increase the available supply, increase competition (even with their
backroom deals, they all cheat and produce more than they say they will),
which decreases prices. Free trade just works better. Additionally, Rule
#1 when dealing with free trade . . . don't attack your buyer,
you'll lose that revenue stream. Free trade increases communication and
tears down barriers over time.
.


User: "JPG"

Title: Re: Brace for it 15 Apr 2004 06:26:09 AM
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 15:44:20 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:


"JPG" <me@privacy.net> wrote

I know the majority of Americans don't like hearing this,
but gasoline in the US is far too cheap and encourages
profligacy.


Having just identified "Taxes" as a major cause for your increased
prices, and further speculating that the U.S. government does not
operate on charity, would you not conclude that your American
counterparts are paying just as much in taxes -- either directly or
indirectly through reduced services -- rather than we're somehow
geting a "free ride"?

I don't doubt it, you have to pay for medical treatment and the full cost of
college courses - we don't, so in that sense *we're* getting a "free" ride.


Seriously.

Now, please, take this into account and offer us something other than
a polite "***** you, you spoiled yanks!"

I know Americans are touchy about their cheap fuel - you've just demonstrated
that, just as the UK is touchy about free medical services and cheap further
education.
Yes you are spoiled with cheap fuel, yes you do have a hard time if you fall ill
in the US or you have kids to put through college, yes we are spoiled by our
free health service and cheap university courses, yes we are ***** by
highly- taxed fuel.


And, oh, also take into account that the worlds oil market does include
the U.K.

It's just as well we don't drive vehicles the size of APCs, then. OTOH, our
publicly funded health service is creaking under the strain and the universities
are strapped for cash.


We're not just expecting oil prices to rise significantly in this country.
The same forces at work here will be at play in the U.K. and elsewhere.

Naturally.




.
User: "JTEM"

Title: Re: Brace for it 15 Apr 2004 08:22:14 PM
"JPG" <me@privacy.net> wrote

It's just as well we don't drive vehicles the size of
APCs, then.

Neither do I. I don't think they sell them in Europe (I couldn't
imagine why you'd choose one over the European models),
but I have a Neon. It's small & cheap. In fact, it was $1,500
cheaper than a similarly equiped VW Golf when I bought it.
That was before the "Thousand Dollars Cash-Back," which I
applied towards the down payment.
But, even us Americans who don't drive Office-buildings-on-
wheels (and there are a few of us) should be concerned about
the current political situation.
America will go to war over another embargo. Europe will
be attacked because of it. However, Europe will blame the
United States and will not join us, in spite of their own best
interests.
The world will look *Very* different in ten years, unless we
decide to do something about it NOW.
.



User: "Woden"

Title: Re: Brace for it 13 Apr 2004 07:15:18 AM
JPG <me@privacy.net> honored us in alt.atheism with the following
discourse:

On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 23:27:56 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
wrote:


The big auto makers are suddenly investing heavily
in small cars again.

Chevy is even retiring the Cavalier and calling its
replacement, the Cobalt, a "premium small car."

Toyota has an all-new product line, Scion, with the
little 1.5 liter engine.


Sort of sums up the problem from the European perspective, that you
call a 1.5 litre engine "little". I don't think I have ever owned a
car with an engine that big in 35 years' driving.

When the current cost of petrol (gasoline) in the UK is 80p a litre,
or at current rates of exchange $5.20 a US gallon, I think you can see
why. Petrol is heavily taxed to conserve oil, so we are told by the
government, though I suspect that the extra tax income is welcome.

I know the majority of Americans don't like hearing this, but gasoline
in the US is far too cheap and encourages profligacy.

No doubt when the fuel crunch comes - as it will - then Americans may
think differently, but at the present time I guess any US politician
suggesting conservation by taxation is likely to be as welcome as a
turd in a swimming pool, and would not have a hope in "hell" of ever
being elected.

Of course not. The big oil business wouldn't bankroll him.
--
Woden
"religion is a socio-political institution for the control of
people's thoughts, lives, and actions; based on
ancient myths and superstitions perpetrated through
generations of subtle yet pervasive brainwashing."
.

User: "canuck_flix"

Title: Re: Brace for it 15 Apr 2004 05:29:26 PM
JPG <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:<dm8n70hgt6hqgjd0ftnddlbu0vj98fvrsi@4ax.com>...

On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 23:27:56 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
wrote:


The big auto makers are suddenly investing heavily
in small cars again.

Chevy is even retiring the Cavalier and calling its
replacement, the Cobalt, a "premium small car."

Toyota has an all-new product line, Scion, with the
little 1.5 liter engine.


Sort of sums up the problem from the European perspective, that you
call a 1.5 litre engine "little". I don't think I have ever owned a
car with an engine that big in 35 years' driving.

When the current cost of petrol (gasoline) in the UK is 80p a litre,
or at current rates of exchange $5.20 a US gallon, I think you can see
why. Petrol is heavily taxed to conserve oil, so we are told by the
government, though I suspect that the extra tax income is welcome.

I know the majority of Americans don't like hearing this, but gasoline
in the US is far too cheap and encourages profligacy.

You should be beaten to death, seriously. Leave it up to a liberal
***** to suggest taxing gasoline. There are poor and
lower-middle-class people that need to drive 150 miles a day to get to
work, but liberals are too stupid to factor that in. Liberals are
wimpy, airheaded, foo-foo cunts that want to be told good things and
are incapable of critical thinking, and their heads hurt if they think
too much, so someone suggested to them "hey, if we instigate some
communist, Castro-style taxes on gasoline, that means everyone will
stop driving!" and of course they believed it, because liberals are
too stupid to think things through. They only like happy thoughts, and
cannot imagine that their Stalinist tax robbery on gasoline would ever
put a burden on poor people that need to drive long distances for
their employment.
Unfortunately liberals will never have the truth dawn on them and
realize what idiots they are, since they lack the common sense to ever
grow out of their naivette. And since you can't teach common sense to
someone that lacks it... they should only be put out of everyone's
misery.


No doubt when the fuel crunch comes - as it will - then Americans may
think differently, but at the present time I guess any US politician
suggesting conservation by taxation is likely to be as welcome as a
turd in a swimming pool, and would not have a hope in "hell" of ever
being elected.

JPG


I just did a little comparison shopping on pickup
trucks for the room mate, and both Toyota & GMC
appear to have removed the fuel economy ratings
for their smaller trucks with the V6.

MPG: NA

If I didn't know any better I'd say that the auto industry
isn't expecting gas prices to fall...








.
User: "Mr Smith"

Title: Re: Brace for it 15 Apr 2004 05:50:55 PM
"canuck_flix" <canuck_flix@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4f0128fe.0404151429.350ff432@posting.google.com...

JPG <me@privacy.net> wrote in message

news:<dm8n70hgt6hqgjd0ftnddlbu0vj98fvrsi@4ax.com>...

On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 23:27:56 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
wrote:


The big auto makers are suddenly investing heavily
in small cars again.

Chevy is even retiring the Cavalier and calling its
replacement, the Cobalt, a "premium small car."

Toyota has an all-new product line, Scion, with the
little 1.5 liter engine.


Sort of sums up the problem from the European perspective, that you
call a 1.5 litre engine "little". I don't think I have ever owned a
car with an engine that big in 35 years' driving.

When the current cost of petrol (gasoline) in the UK is 80p a litre,
or at current rates of exchange $5.20 a US gallon, I think you can see
why. Petrol is heavily taxed to conserve oil, so we are told by the
government, though I suspect that the extra tax income is welcome.

I know the majority of Americans don't like hearing this, but gasoline
in the US is far too cheap and encourages profligacy.



You should be beaten to death, seriously. Leave it up to a liberal
***** to suggest taxing gasoline. There are poor and
lower-middle-class people that need to drive 150 miles a day to get to
work, but liberals are too stupid to factor that in. Liberals are
wimpy, airheaded, foo-foo cunts that want to be told good things and
are incapable of critical thinking, and their heads hurt if they think
too much, so someone suggested to them "hey, if we instigate some
communist, Castro-style taxes on gasoline, that means everyone will
stop driving!" and of course they believed it, because liberals are
too stupid to think things through. They only like happy thoughts, and
cannot imagine that their Stalinist tax robbery on gasoline would ever
put a burden on poor people that need to drive long distances for
their employment.

Unfortunately liberals will never have the truth dawn on them and
realize what idiots they are, since they lack the common sense to ever
grow out of their naivette. And since you can't teach common sense to
someone that lacks it... they should only be put out of everyone's
misery.





No doubt when the fuel crunch comes - as it will - then Americans may
think differently, but at the present time I guess any US politician
suggesting conservation by taxation is likely to be as welcome as a
turd in a swimming pool, and would not have a hope in "hell" of ever
being elected.

JPG


I just did a little comparison shopping on pickup
trucks for the room mate, and both Toyota & GMC
appear to have removed the fuel economy ratings
for their smaller trucks with the V6.

MPG: NA

If I didn't know any better I'd say that the auto industry
isn't expecting gas prices to fall...








Duh, liberals bad, conservatives good. <-- More 'logic' from canuck_flix
.


User: "Matt"

Title: Re: Brace for it 13 Apr 2004 04:13:20 AM
JPG wrote:

On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 23:27:56 -0400, "JTEM" <gymraven@hotmail.com>
wrote:


The big auto makers are suddenly investing heavily
in small cars again.

Chevy is even retiring the Cavalier and calling its
replacement, the Cobalt, a "premium small car."

Toyota has an all-new product line, Scion, with the
little 1.5 liter engine.



Sort of sums up the problem from the European perspective, that you
call a 1.5 litre engine "little". I don't think I have ever owned a
car with an engine that big in 35 years' driving.

True, I look out in the general public, most cars are 1.6litre, and you
*may* occasionally see a 2.0litre one, generally those from around 10
years ago. About the only ones you really see above 2litres are muscle
cars that cost a small fortune; Holden HSV is one example ;)

When the current cost of petrol (gasoline) in the UK is 80p a litre,
or at current rates of exchange $5.20 a US gallon, I think you can see
why. Petrol is heavily taxed to conserve oil, so we are told by the
government, though I suspect that the extra tax income is welcome.

Mind you, it isn't though you've ever heard the government say, "oh, we
feel so guilty having so much money here!" ;)

I know the majority of Americans don't like hearing this, but gasoline
in the US is far too cheap and encourages profligacy.

No doubt when the fuel crunch comes - as it will - then Americans may
think differently, but at the present time I guess any US politician
suggesting conservation by taxation is likely to be as welcome as a
turd in a swimming pool, and would not have a hope in "hell" of ever
being elected.

Strange, I've never seen an election NZ where the deciding issue was gas
prices, it has always been the traditional areas of health, education,
social welfare, economy, taxation etc.
Matt
--
http://home.iprimus.com.au/matgarnz
"You don't have to live next to me, Just give me my
equality" - Nina Simone (Mississippi *****)
"Atheism is a non-prophet organisation" - Anonymous
"A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a
statistic." - Joseph Stalin
"Death solves all problems - no man, no problem." -
Joseph Stalin
"There are no morals in politics; there is only
expedience. A scoundrel may be of use to us just
because he is a scoundrel." - Vladimir Ilyich Lenin
.



  Page 7 of 7

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3806     pg.2114     pg.1174     pg.652     pg.362     pg.201     pg.112     pg.63     pg.36     pg.21     pg.13     pg.9     pg.7     pg.5     pg.3

OLDER