| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
03 Oct 2006 11:20:04 PM |
| Object: |
Bringing the Bible back to the classroom |
The Bible should be taught in every classroom in America. The literary
qualities alone are sufficient enough reason to do so. America can not spend
her energies catering to the crying of the Jews and the Atheists, both of
whom have an aversion to anything Christian. The overwhelming majority of
people embrace the Bible and should have cause to expect it to be taught to
our children.
http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/10/32006h.asp
....This academic year, hundreds of public school districts nationwide are
offering elective Bible courses in high schools, which can be legal if it's
done carefully. The Supreme Court, in its 1963 ruling that barred ceremonial
school Bible readings, said the Bible is "worthy of study for its literary
and historic qualities" so long as material is "presented objectively as
part of a secular program of education." Surveys show widespread biblical
illiteracy among young Americans, much to the distress of high school and
college teachers who recognize scripture's central role in culture and
history. Competing curricula are offered by the Bible Literacy Project and
the National Council on Bible Curriculum in Public Schools.
--
----------
J Yöung
youngopinions@aol.com
.
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: Bringing the Bible back to the classroom |
04 Oct 2006 09:50:22 PM |
|
|
Father Haskell wrote:
J Young wrote:
The Bible should be taught in every classroom in America. The literary
qualities alone are sufficient enough reason to do so. America can not spend
her energies catering to the crying of the Jews
Jesus heard that.
and the Atheists,
He heard that, too. He's on our side now, you know.
both of
whom have an aversion to anything Christian. The overwhelming majority of
people embrace the Bible and should have cause to expect it to be taught to
our children.
Including the patently gory parts, like Judas Iscariot's suicide in
Acts 1:18? I'll throw SUCH a fit if that passage isn't included in
this enlightened plan for our youngsters' edification. Didn't that bit
of inspiration add a memorable flavor to the second Silence of the
Lambs installment? Kids are sleighted if they don't know where their
favorite snuff films came from.
I want them taught the part with Lot fucking his daughters and getting
them pregnant.
--
--sexkitten--
Sneechres and the art of projection- part 2
1130732777.897897.129520@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Psychologists call it"leveling." You either have to inflate your own
sense of self-worth
somehow or try and bring others down to you.
1414fd53.0210041619.6a748430@posting.google.com
miserable fishreek skankwhore
1414fd53.0401182312.d795ffd@posting.google.com
fishreek skank *****
8505fb$b0u$1@nnrp1.deja.com (as asaurus)
Nice try, fishreek.
8822ia$v22$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 (as asaurus)
She's a fishreek hypocrite
894cmj$frh$1@nnrp1.deja.com (as asaurus)
fishreek ho
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Bringing the Bible back to the classroom |
05 Oct 2006 09:54:51 AM |
|
|
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Z6adnVkn0ZCD7rnYnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@giganews.com...
Father Haskell wrote:
J Young wrote:
The Bible should be taught in every classroom in America. The literary
qualities alone are sufficient enough reason to do so. America can not
spend
her energies catering to the crying of the Jews
Jesus heard that.
and the Atheists,
He heard that, too. He's on our side now, you know.
both of
whom have an aversion to anything Christian. The overwhelming majority of
people embrace the Bible and should have cause to expect it to be taught
to
our children.
Including the patently gory parts, like Judas Iscariot's suicide in
Acts 1:18? I'll throw SUCH a fit if that passage isn't included in
this enlightened plan for our youngsters' edification. Didn't that bit
of inspiration add a memorable flavor to the second Silence of the
Lambs installment? Kids are sleighted if they don't know where their
favorite snuff films came from.
I want them taught the part with Lot fucking his daughters and getting
them pregnant.
How about the part when Noah got *****-faced and passed out buck naked?
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Bringing the Bible back to the classroom |
05 Oct 2006 02:17:47 PM |
|
|
On 5-Oct-2006, "Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
How about the part when Noah got *****-faced and passed out buck naked?
I like that, too: teaches not only that parents aren't perfect,
but how the respectful child is to deal with a parent's foibles.
Susan
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Bringing the Bible back to the classroom |
09 Oct 2006 04:28:13 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 19:17:47 GMT, wrote in
alt.atheism
On 5-Oct-2006, "Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
How about the part when Noah got *****-faced and passed out buck naked?
I like that, too: teaches not only that parents aren't perfect,
but how the respectful child is to deal with a parent's foibles.
But then parents are to kill the child instead of respecting his/her
foibles.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Bringing the Bible back to the classroom |
10 Oct 2006 03:51:00 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 14:28:13 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 19:17:47 GMT, wrote in
alt.atheism
On 5-Oct-2006, "Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
How about the part when Noah got *****-faced and passed out buck naked?
I like that, too: teaches not only that parents aren't perfect,
but how the respectful child is to deal with a parent's foibles.
But then parents are to kill the child instead of respecting his/her
foibles.
Unless he's a congresscritter - then he gets to play with the kid's
foibles.
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything."
- Friedrich Nietzsche
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Bringing the Bible back to the classroom |
11 Oct 2006 07:50:26 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:51:00 -0400, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 14:28:13 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 19:17:47 GMT, wrote in
alt.atheism
On 5-Oct-2006, "Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
How about the part when Noah got *****-faced and passed out buck naked?
I like that, too: teaches not only that parents aren't perfect,
but how the respectful child is to deal with a parent's foibles.
But then parents are to kill the child instead of respecting his/her
foibles.
Unless he's a congresscritter - then he gets to play with the kid's
foibles.
And if the person is an RCC Cardinal aiding/abetting/covering up for
priests for decades they get moved to a location they cannot be
extracted from and given a promotion.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Bringing the Bible back to the classroom |
11 Oct 2006 09:31:34 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 17:50:26 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:51:00 -0400, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
Unless he's a congresscritter - then he gets to play with the kid's
foibles.
And if the person is an RCC Cardinal aiding/abetting/covering up for
priests for decades they get moved to a location they cannot be
extracted from and given a promotion.
A promotion to a bigger kid with bigger foibles?
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"Christians, it is needless to say, utterly detest each other. They slander each
other constantly with the vilest forms of abuse and cannot come to any sort of
agreement in their teachings. Each sect brands its own, fills the head of its own
with deceitful nonsense, and makes perfect little pigs of those it wins over to its
side."
- Celsus On the True Doctrine, translated by R. Joseph Hoffman, Oxford University Press, 1987
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Bringing the Bible back to the classroom |
12 Oct 2006 10:54:50 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 22:31:34 -0400, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 17:50:26 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:51:00 -0400, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
in alt.atheism
Unless he's a congresscritter - then he gets to play with the kid's
foibles.
And if the person is an RCC Cardinal aiding/abetting/covering up for
priests for decades they get moved to a location they cannot be
extracted from and given a promotion.
A promotion to a bigger kid with bigger foibles?
Yes.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: Bringing the Bible back to the classroom |
04 Oct 2006 10:19:44 PM |
|
|
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Z6adnVkn0ZCD7rnYnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@giganews.com...
Father Haskell wrote:
J Young wrote:
The Bible should be taught in every classroom in America. The literary
qualities alone are sufficient enough reason to do so. America can not
spend
her energies catering to the crying of the Jews
Jesus heard that.
and the Atheists,
He heard that, too. He's on our side now, you know.
both of
whom have an aversion to anything Christian. The overwhelming majority of
people embrace the Bible and should have cause to expect it to be taught
to
our children.
Including the patently gory parts, like Judas Iscariot's suicide in
Acts 1:18? I'll throw SUCH a fit if that passage isn't included in
this enlightened plan for our youngsters' edification. Didn't that bit
of inspiration add a memorable flavor to the second Silence of the
Lambs installment? Kids are sleighted if they don't know where their
favorite snuff films came from.
I want them taught the part with Lot fucking his daughters and getting
them pregnant.
Why?
Is that what your dad did to you?
AND, funny thing is Lot's daughters were who came up with the idea, and they
were NOT for ABORTING the babies inside them.
How soon you forget the rest of the story, huh?
Very typical of pro-choice idiots.
.
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: Bringing the Bible back to the classroom |
04 Oct 2006 10:29:43 PM |
|
|
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Z6adnVkn0ZCD7rnYnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@giganews.com...
Father Haskell wrote:
J Young wrote:
The Bible should be taught in every classroom in America. The literary
qualities alone are sufficient enough reason to do so. America can not
spend
her energies catering to the crying of the Jews
Jesus heard that.
and the Atheists,
He heard that, too. He's on our side now, you know.
both of
whom have an aversion to anything Christian. The overwhelming majority of
people embrace the Bible and should have cause to expect it to be taught
to
our children.
Including the patently gory parts, like Judas Iscariot's suicide in
Acts 1:18? I'll throw SUCH a fit if that passage isn't included in
this enlightened plan for our youngsters' edification. Didn't that bit
of inspiration add a memorable flavor to the second Silence of the
Lambs installment? Kids are sleighted if they don't know where their
favorite snuff films came from.
I want them taught the part with Lot fucking his daughters and getting
them pregnant.
Why?
Because it's in the Bible. Why not?
Is that what your dad did to you?
No. You?
AND, funny thing is Lot's daughters were who came up with the idea, and they
were NOT for ABORTING the babies inside them.
Who cares?
How soon you forget the rest of the story, huh?
The gist of the story is plenty. Incest breeding in the Bible. Nice.
Very typical of pro-choice idiots.
--
--sexkitten--
Sneechres and the art of projection- part 2
1130732777.897897.129520@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Psychologists call it"leveling." You either have to inflate your own
sense of self-worth
somehow or try and bring others down to you.
1414fd53.0210041619.6a748430@posting.google.com
miserable fishreek skankwhore
1414fd53.0401182312.d795ffd@posting.google.com
fishreek skank *****
8505fb$b0u$1@nnrp1.deja.com (as asaurus)
Nice try, fishreek.
8822ia$v22$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 (as asaurus)
She's a fishreek hypocrite
894cmj$frh$1@nnrp1.deja.com (as asaurus)
fishreek ho
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: Bringing the Bible back to the classroom |
05 Oct 2006 10:04:39 AM |
|
|
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:qNydneFXErPG4bnYnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Z6adnVkn0ZCD7rnYnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@giganews.com...
Father Haskell wrote:
J Young wrote:
The Bible should be taught in every classroom in America. The literary
qualities alone are sufficient enough reason to do so. America can not
spend
her energies catering to the crying of the Jews
Jesus heard that.
and the Atheists,
He heard that, too. He's on our side now, you know.
both of
whom have an aversion to anything Christian. The overwhelming majority
of
people embrace the Bible and should have cause to expect it to be
taught to
our children.
Including the patently gory parts, like Judas Iscariot's suicide in
Acts 1:18? I'll throw SUCH a fit if that passage isn't included in
this enlightened plan for our youngsters' edification. Didn't that bit
of inspiration add a memorable flavor to the second Silence of the
Lambs installment? Kids are sleighted if they don't know where their
favorite snuff films came from.
I want them taught the part with Lot fucking his daughters and getting
them pregnant.
Why?
Because it's in the Bible. Why not?
So, why is that the only part you want taught, abortion fool?
Is that what your dad did to you?
No. You?
Stay on the subject, *****.
AND, funny thing is Lot's daughters were who came up with the idea, and
they were NOT for ABORTING the babies inside them.
Who cares?
Everyone who respects the truth.
How soon you forget the rest of the story, huh?
The gist of the story is plenty. Incest breeding in the Bible. Nice.
To you?
Incest isn't the gist of the story.
No one respects an idiot, disrespectful coward such as yourself who tries to
attribute shame to something that has no shame in it.
Very typical of pro-choice idiots.
.
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: Bringing the Bible back to the classroom |
05 Oct 2006 12:47:56 PM |
|
|
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:qNydneFXErPG4bnYnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Z6adnVkn0ZCD7rnYnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@giganews.com...
Father Haskell wrote:
J Young wrote:
The Bible should be taught in every classroom in America. The literary
qualities alone are sufficient enough reason to do so. America can not
spend
her energies catering to the crying of the Jews
Jesus heard that.
and the Atheists,
He heard that, too. He's on our side now, you know.
both of
whom have an aversion to anything Christian. The overwhelming majority
of
people embrace the Bible and should have cause to expect it to be
taught to
our children.
Including the patently gory parts, like Judas Iscariot's suicide in
Acts 1:18? I'll throw SUCH a fit if that passage isn't included in
this enlightened plan for our youngsters' edification. Didn't that bit
of inspiration add a memorable flavor to the second Silence of the
Lambs installment? Kids are sleighted if they don't know where their
favorite snuff films came from.
I want them taught the part with Lot fucking his daughters and getting
them pregnant.
Why?
Because it's in the Bible. Why not?
So, why is that the only part you want taught, abortion fool?
No, but it's a good start.
Is that what your dad did to you?
No. You?
Stay on the subject, *****.
That IS the subject. You brought it up. Is that a yes?
AND, funny thing is Lot's daughters were who came up with the idea, and
they were NOT for ABORTING the babies inside them.
Who cares?
Everyone who respects the truth.
People that respect the truth don't care. See, they CHOSE to get
pregnant and CHOSE to have the kids.
How soon you forget the rest of the story, huh?
The gist of the story is plenty. Incest breeding in the Bible. Nice.
To you?
Incest isn't the gist of the story.
Yes, it is. Getting their father drunk so they could have sex with him?
No one respects an idiot, disrespectful coward such as yourself who tries to
attribute shame to something that has no shame in it.
Oh, so there's no shame in incest? Do tell.
Very typical of pro-choice idiots.
--
--sexkitten--
Sneechres and the art of projection- part 2
1130732777.897897.129520@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Psychologists call it"leveling." You either have to inflate your own
sense of self-worth
somehow or try and bring others down to you.
1414fd53.0210041619.6a748430@posting.google.com
miserable fishreek skankwhore
1414fd53.0401182312.d795ffd@posting.google.com
fishreek skank *****
8505fb$b0u$1@nnrp1.deja.com (as asaurus)
Nice try, fishreek.
8822ia$v22$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1 (as asaurus)
She's a fishreek hypocrite
894cmj$frh$1@nnrp1.deja.com (as asaurus)
fishreek ho
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: Bringing the Bible back to the classroom |
06 Oct 2006 10:03:53 PM |
|
|
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Fcednd4LzdXh2LjYnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:qNydneFXErPG4bnYnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Z6adnVkn0ZCD7rnYnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@giganews.com...
Father Haskell wrote:
J Young wrote:
The Bible should be taught in every classroom in America. The
literary
qualities alone are sufficient enough reason to do so. America can
not spend
her energies catering to the crying of the Jews
Jesus heard that.
and the Atheists,
He heard that, too. He's on our side now, you know.
both of
whom have an aversion to anything Christian. The overwhelming
majority of
people embrace the Bible and should have cause to expect it to be
taught to
our children.
Including the patently gory parts, like Judas Iscariot's suicide in
Acts 1:18? I'll throw SUCH a fit if that passage isn't included in
this enlightened plan for our youngsters' edification. Didn't that
bit
of inspiration add a memorable flavor to the second Silence of the
Lambs installment? Kids are sleighted if they don't know where their
favorite snuff films came from.
I want them taught the part with Lot fucking his daughters and getting
them pregnant.
Why?
Because it's in the Bible. Why not?
So, why is that the only part you want taught, abortion fool?
No, but it's a good start.
Is that what your dad did to you?
No. You?
Stay on the subject, *****.
That IS the subject. You brought it up. Is that a yes?
AND, funny thing is Lot's daughters were who came up with the idea, and
they were NOT for ABORTING the babies inside them.
Who cares?
Everyone who respects the truth.
People that respect the truth don't care. See, they CHOSE to get pregnant
and CHOSE to have the kids.
How soon you forget the rest of the story, huh?
The gist of the story is plenty. Incest breeding in the Bible. Nice.
To you?
Incest isn't the gist of the story.
Yes, it is. Getting their father drunk so they could have sex with him?
No one respects an idiot, disrespectful coward such as yourself who tries
to attribute shame to something that has no shame in it.
Oh, so there's no shame in incest? Do tell.
In this case there is no shame in it.
Read the whole story.
There were no other men in the area for them to become pregnant by.
Very typical of pro-choice idiots.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Father Haskell" |
|
| Title: Re: Bringing the Bible back to the classroom |
09 Oct 2006 10:12:20 PM |
|
|
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Fcednd4LzdXh2LjYnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:qNydneFXErPG4bnYnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Z6adnVkn0ZCD7rnYnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@giganews.com...
Father Haskell wrote:
J Young wrote:
The Bible should be taught in every classroom in America. The
literary
qualities alone are sufficient enough reason to do so. America can
not spend
her energies catering to the crying of the Jews
Jesus heard that.
and the Atheists,
He heard that, too. He's on our side now, you know.
both of
whom have an aversion to anything Christian. The overwhelming
majority of
people embrace the Bible and should have cause to expect it to be
taught to
our children.
Including the patently gory parts, like Judas Iscariot's suicide in
Acts 1:18? I'll throw SUCH a fit if that passage isn't included in
this enlightened plan for our youngsters' edification. Didn't that
bit
of inspiration add a memorable flavor to the second Silence of the
Lambs installment? Kids are sleighted if they don't know where their
favorite snuff films came from.
I want them taught the part with Lot fucking his daughters and getting
them pregnant.
Why?
Because it's in the Bible. Why not?
So, why is that the only part you want taught, abortion fool?
No, but it's a good start.
Is that what your dad did to you?
No. You?
Stay on the subject, *****.
That IS the subject. You brought it up. Is that a yes?
AND, funny thing is Lot's daughters were who came up with the idea, and
they were NOT for ABORTING the babies inside them.
Who cares?
Everyone who respects the truth.
People that respect the truth don't care. See, they CHOSE to get pregnant
and CHOSE to have the kids.
How soon you forget the rest of the story, huh?
The gist of the story is plenty. Incest breeding in the Bible. Nice.
To you?
Incest isn't the gist of the story.
Yes, it is. Getting their father drunk so they could have sex with him?
No one respects an idiot, disrespectful coward such as yourself who tries
to attribute shame to something that has no shame in it.
Oh, so there's no shame in incest? Do tell.
In this case there is no shame in it.
Read the whole story.
There were no other men in the area for them to become pregnant by.
So it's okay to screw your own kids. So long as god says so.
Very typical of pro-choice idiots.
Sick puppy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Bringing the Bible back to the classroom |
10 Oct 2006 08:26:27 AM |
|
|
On 9-Oct-2006, "Father Haskell" <fatherhaskell@yahoo.com> wrote:
In this case there is no shame in it.
Read the whole story.
There were no other men in the area for them to become pregnant by.
So it's okay to screw your own kids. So long as god says so.
What he refuses to grasp is that the story is about how pervasive evil is.
That if a good family lives among evil, it will infect them, too.
It is more than obvious that to grown women, or even teenagers, that
one city is not the world, and when they left said city, the world around
them was still intact. S/G had infected even Lot's family, and it was stupid
of him to have chosen to live there.
Susan
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Bringing the Bible back to the classroom |
10 Oct 2006 06:16:07 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:26:27 GMT, wrote in
alt.atheism
On 9-Oct-2006, "Father Haskell" <fatherhaskell@yahoo.com> wrote:
In this case there is no shame in it.
Read the whole story.
There were no other men in the area for them to become pregnant by.
So it's okay to screw your own kids. So long as god says so.
What he refuses to grasp is that the story is about how pervasive evil is.
That if a good family lives among evil, it will infect them, too.
It is more than obvious that to grown women, or even teenagers, that
one city is not the world, and when they left said city, the world around
them was still intact. S/G had infected even Lot's family, and it was stupid
of him to have chosen to live there.
"Divine Plan®."
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Bringing the Bible back to the classroom |
10 Oct 2006 03:54:39 PM |
|
|
On 9 Oct 2006 20:12:20 -0700, "Father Haskell"
<fatherhaskell@yahoo.com> wrote:
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Fcednd4LzdXh2LjYnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@giganews.com...
Oh, so there's no shame in incest? Do tell.
In this case there is no shame in it.
Read the whole story.
There were no other men in the area for them to become pregnant by.
So it's okay to screw your own kids. So long as god says so.
What good is having a god if it doesn't tell you to do what you want?
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the harmony of all that exists, but
not in a God who concerns himself with the fate and actions of human beings."
-A. Einstein (1929 -- Einstein Archive 33-272)
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: Bringing the Bible back to the classroom |
06 Oct 2006 10:11:20 PM |
|
|
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Fcednd4LzdXh2LjYnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:qNydneFXErPG4bnYnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Z6adnVkn0ZCD7rnYnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@giganews.com...
Father Haskell wrote:
J Young wrote:
The Bible should be taught in every classroom in America. The
literary
qualities alone are sufficient enough reason to do so. America can
not spend
her energies catering to the crying of the Jews
Jesus heard that.
and the Atheists,
He heard that, too. He's on our side now, you know.
both of
whom have an aversion to anything Christian. The overwhelming
majority of
people embrace the Bible and should have cause to expect it to be
taught to
our children.
Including the patently gory parts, like Judas Iscariot's suicide in
Acts 1:18? I'll throw SUCH a fit if that passage isn't included in
this enlightened plan for our youngsters' edification. Didn't that
bit
of inspiration add a memorable flavor to the second Silence of the
Lambs installment? Kids are sleighted if they don't know where their
favorite snuff films came from.
I want them taught the part with Lot fucking his daughters and getting
them pregnant.
Why?
Because it's in the Bible. Why not?
So, why is that the only part you want taught, abortion fool?
No, but it's a good start.
Is that what your dad did to you?
No. You?
Stay on the subject, *****.
That IS the subject. You brought it up. Is that a yes?
AND, funny thing is Lot's daughters were who came up with the idea, and
they were NOT for ABORTING the babies inside them.
Who cares?
Everyone who respects the truth.
People that respect the truth don't care. See, they CHOSE to get pregnant
and CHOSE to have the kids.
How soon you forget the rest of the story, huh?
The gist of the story is plenty. Incest breeding in the Bible. Nice.
To you?
Incest isn't the gist of the story.
Yes, it is. Getting their father drunk so they could have sex with him?
No one respects an idiot, disrespectful coward such as yourself who tries
to attribute shame to something that has no shame in it.
Oh, so there's no shame in incest? Do tell.
In this case there is no shame in it.
Dude, they got their father drunk, had sex with him and had his kids. Yuck.
Read the whole story.
There were no other men in the area for them to become pregnant by.
There were no men left on the planet? Do tell.
--
--sexkitten--
Sneechres and the art of projection- part 3
1130732777.897897.129520@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Psychologists call it"leveling." You either have to inflate your own
sense of self-worth
somehow or try and bring others down to you.
1414fd53.0402042145.2faac5c9@posting.google.com
you're a *****
1414fd53.0301242012.7786001e@posting.google.com
*I* said you were a *****, and you are
1414fd53.0201151612.5d801f91@posting.google.com
I don't own a vibrator,*****.
1414fd53.0312142051.5e760545@posting.google.com
you stupid *****
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: Bringing the Bible back to the classroom |
06 Oct 2006 10:42:20 PM |
|
|
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:osOdnT1tJ8-XhrrYnZ2dnUVZ_u2dnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Fcednd4LzdXh2LjYnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:qNydneFXErPG4bnYnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Z6adnVkn0ZCD7rnYnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@giganews.com...
Father Haskell wrote:
J Young wrote:
The Bible should be taught in every classroom in America. The
literary
qualities alone are sufficient enough reason to do so. America can
not spend
her energies catering to the crying of the Jews
Jesus heard that.
and the Atheists,
He heard that, too. He's on our side now, you know.
both of
whom have an aversion to anything Christian. The overwhelming
majority of
people embrace the Bible and should have cause to expect it to be
taught to
our children.
Including the patently gory parts, like Judas Iscariot's suicide in
Acts 1:18? I'll throw SUCH a fit if that passage isn't included in
this enlightened plan for our youngsters' edification. Didn't that
bit
of inspiration add a memorable flavor to the second Silence of the
Lambs installment? Kids are sleighted if they don't know where
their
favorite snuff films came from.
I want them taught the part with Lot fucking his daughters and
getting them pregnant.
Why?
Because it's in the Bible. Why not?
So, why is that the only part you want taught, abortion fool?
No, but it's a good start.
Is that what your dad did to you?
No. You?
Stay on the subject, *****.
That IS the subject. You brought it up. Is that a yes?
AND, funny thing is Lot's daughters were who came up with the idea,
and they were NOT for ABORTING the babies inside them.
Who cares?
Everyone who respects the truth.
People that respect the truth don't care. See, they CHOSE to get pregnant
and CHOSE to have the kids.
How soon you forget the rest of the story, huh?
The gist of the story is plenty. Incest breeding in the Bible. Nice.
To you?
Incest isn't the gist of the story.
Yes, it is. Getting their father drunk so they could have sex with him?
No one respects an idiot, disrespectful coward such as yourself who
tries to attribute shame to something that has no shame in it.
Oh, so there's no shame in incest? Do tell.
In this case there is no shame in it.
Dude, they got their father drunk, had sex with him and had his kids.
Yuck.
So what?
Are you such a pervert against children that you can do nothing but try to
act as if there is sin in something that was NECESSARY?
Read the whole story.
There were no other men in the area for them to become pregnant by.
There were no men left on the planet? Do tell.
Read it.
Why are you asking me?
Do you want to be treated as if you actually know something or do you want
to go around acting like some ignorant fool who has no understanding?
You think there were airplanes back then or cars or busses or fetility
clinics(AI)?
When will you start learning something about LIFE itself instead of arguing
to kill it?
.
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: Bringing the Bible back to the classroom |
06 Oct 2006 11:24:15 PM |
|
|
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:osOdnT1tJ8-XhrrYnZ2dnUVZ_u2dnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Fcednd4LzdXh2LjYnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:qNydneFXErPG4bnYnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Z6adnVkn0ZCD7rnYnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@giganews.com...
Father Haskell wrote:
J Young wrote:
The Bible should be taught in every classroom in America. The
literary
qualities alone are sufficient enough reason to do so. America can
not spend
her energies catering to the crying of the Jews
Jesus heard that.
and the Atheists,
He heard that, too. He's on our side now, you know.
both of
whom have an aversion to anything Christian. The overwhelming
majority of
people embrace the Bible and should have cause to expect it to be
taught to
our children.
Including the patently gory parts, like Judas Iscariot's suicide in
Acts 1:18? I'll throw SUCH a fit if that passage isn't included in
this enlightened plan for our youngsters' edification. Didn't that
bit
of inspiration add a memorable flavor to the second Silence of the
Lambs installment? Kids are sleighted if they don't know where
their
favorite snuff films came from.
I want them taught the part with Lot fucking his daughters and
getting them pregnant.
Why?
Because it's in the Bible. Why not?
So, why is that the only part you want taught, abortion fool?
No, but it's a good start.
Is that what your dad did to you?
No. You?
Stay on the subject, *****.
That IS the subject. You brought it up. Is that a yes?
AND, funny thing is Lot's daughters were who came up with the idea,
and they were NOT for ABORTING the babies inside them.
Who cares?
Everyone who respects the truth.
People that respect the truth don't care. See, they CHOSE to get pregnant
and CHOSE to have the kids.
How soon you forget the rest of the story, huh?
The gist of the story is plenty. Incest breeding in the Bible. Nice.
To you?
Incest isn't the gist of the story.
Yes, it is. Getting their father drunk so they could have sex with him?
No one respects an idiot, disrespectful coward such as yourself who
tries to attribute shame to something that has no shame in it.
Oh, so there's no shame in incest? Do tell.
In this case there is no shame in it.
Dude, they got their father drunk, had sex with him and had his kids.
Yuck.
So what?
Are you such a pervert against children that you can do nothing but try to
act as if there is sin in something that was NECESSARY?
So there's no sin in abortion if it's necessary?
Read the whole story.
There were no other men in the area for them to become pregnant by.
There were no men left on the planet? Do tell.
Read it.
Why are you asking me?
Do you want to be treated as if you actually know something or do you want
to go around acting like some ignorant fool who has no understanding?
You think there were airplanes back then or cars or busses or fetility
clinics(AI)?
Once again: there were no men on the planet? Do tell.
When will you start learning something about LIFE itself instead of arguing
to kill it?
--
--sexkitten--
Sneechres and the art of projection- part 3
1130732777.897897.129520@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Psychologists call it"leveling." You either have to inflate your own
sense of self-worth
somehow or try and bring others down to you.
1414fd53.0402042145.2faac5c9@posting.google.com
you're a *****
1414fd53.0301242012.7786001e@posting.google.com
*I* said you were a *****, and you are
1414fd53.0201151612.5d801f91@posting.google.com
I don't own a vibrator,*****.
1414fd53.0312142051.5e760545@posting.google.com
you stupid *****
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: Bringing the Bible back to the classroom |
06 Oct 2006 11:43:41 PM |
|
|
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:AtidnZWMBPi8sbrYnZ2dnUVZ_tydnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:osOdnT1tJ8-XhrrYnZ2dnUVZ_u2dnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Fcednd4LzdXh2LjYnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:qNydneFXErPG4bnYnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Z6adnVkn0ZCD7rnYnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@giganews.com...
Father Haskell wrote:
J Young wrote:
The Bible should be taught in every classroom in America. The
literary
qualities alone are sufficient enough reason to do so. America
can not spend
her energies catering to the crying of the Jews
Jesus heard that.
and the Atheists,
He heard that, too. He's on our side now, you know.
both of
whom have an aversion to anything Christian. The overwhelming
majority of
people embrace the Bible and should have cause to expect it to be
taught to
our children.
Including the patently gory parts, like Judas Iscariot's suicide
in
Acts 1:18? I'll throw SUCH a fit if that passage isn't included
in
this enlightened plan for our youngsters' edification. Didn't
that bit
of inspiration add a memorable flavor to the second Silence of the
Lambs installment? Kids are sleighted if they don't know where
their
favorite snuff films came from.
I want them taught the part with Lot fucking his daughters and
getting them pregnant.
Why?
Because it's in the Bible. Why not?
So, why is that the only part you want taught, abortion fool?
No, but it's a good start.
Is that what your dad did to you?
No. You?
Stay on the subject, *****.
That IS the subject. You brought it up. Is that a yes?
AND, funny thing is Lot's daughters were who came up with the idea,
and they were NOT for ABORTING the babies inside them.
Who cares?
Everyone who respects the truth.
People that respect the truth don't care. See, they CHOSE to get
pregnant and CHOSE to have the kids.
How soon you forget the rest of the story, huh?
The gist of the story is plenty. Incest breeding in the Bible. Nice.
To you?
Incest isn't the gist of the story.
Yes, it is. Getting their father drunk so they could have sex with him?
No one respects an idiot, disrespectful coward such as yourself who
tries to attribute shame to something that has no shame in it.
Oh, so there's no shame in incest? Do tell.
In this case there is no shame in it.
Dude, they got their father drunk, had sex with him and had his kids.
Yuck.
So what?
Are you such a pervert against children that you can do nothing but try
to act as if there is sin in something that was NECESSARY?
So there's no sin in abortion if it's necessary?
Why must you take everything so personally?
Abortion on the case of reape was legal before 1973.
if you turn face this time, get your god damned unstable idiot mind out of
my face.
Read the whole story.
There were no other men in the area for them to become pregnant by.
There were no men left on the planet? Do tell.
Read it.
Why are you asking me?
Do you want to be treated as if you actually know something or do you
want to go around acting like some ignorant fool who has no
understanding?
You think there were airplanes back then or cars or busses or fetility
clinics(AI)?
Once again: there were no men on the planet? Do tell.
I do not need your god damned idiot questions at my face, idiot.
Get a clue and stop being such a god damned rebellious *****.
I am not a hte-filled ntolerant *****.
That is your agenda, your role, your duty in life as you seek to make men go
to war for your GOD DAMNED enrichment.
And, I will see you die if that is indeed the truth, and I will laugh about
it.
When will you start learning something about LIFE itself instead of
arguing to kill it?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Bringing the Bible back to the classroom |
07 Oct 2006 12:28:28 AM |
|
|
"John D. Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:AtidnZWMBPi8sbrYnZ2dnUVZ_tydnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:osOdnT1tJ8-XhrrYnZ2dnUVZ_u2dnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Fcednd4LzdXh2LjYnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@giganews.com...
[...]
Oh, so there's no shame in incest? Do tell.
In this case there is no shame in it.
Dude, they got their father drunk, had sex with him and had his kids.
Yuck.
So what?
Are you such a pervert against children that you can do nothing but try
to act as if there is sin in something that was NECESSARY?
So there's no sin in abortion if it's necessary?
Why must you take everything so personally?
Abortion on the case of reape was legal before 1973.
if you turn face this time, get your god damned unstable idiot mind out of
my face.
What's keeping you from ignoring her?
Read the whole story.
There were no other men in the area for them to become pregnant by.
There were no men left on the planet? Do tell.
Read it.
Why are you asking me?
Do you want to be treated as if you actually know something or do you
want to go around acting like some ignorant fool who has no
understanding?
You think there were airplanes back then or cars or busses or fetility
clinics(AI)?
Once again: there were no men on the planet? Do tell.
I do not need your god damned idiot questions at my face, idiot.
Why not? You've proved beyond any reasonable doubt that you cannot understand
much of what you read.
Get a clue and stop being such a god damned rebellious *****.
I am not a hte-filled ntolerant *****.
No, you're a psychotic whackjob who blames all homosexuals for the mistake
that resulted in your brother's death.
That is your agenda, your role, your duty in life as you seek to make men go
to war for your GOD DAMNED enrichment.
Your divorce from reality is noted.
And, I will see you die if that is indeed the truth, and I will laugh about
it.
Yeah, there's that "Christian compassion"...
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: Bringing the Bible back to the classroom |
06 Oct 2006 11:49:51 PM |
|
|
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:AtidnZWMBPi8sbrYnZ2dnUVZ_tydnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:osOdnT1tJ8-XhrrYnZ2dnUVZ_u2dnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Fcednd4LzdXh2LjYnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:qNydneFXErPG4bnYnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Z6adnVkn0ZCD7rnYnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@giganews.com...
Father Haskell wrote:
J Young wrote:
The Bible should be taught in every classroom in America. The
literary
qualities alone are sufficient enough reason to do so. America
can not spend
her energies catering to the crying of the Jews
Jesus heard that.
and the Atheists,
He heard that, too. He's on our side now, you know.
both of
whom have an aversion to anything Christian. The overwhelming
majority of
people embrace the Bible and should have cause to expect it to be
taught to
our children.
Including the patently gory parts, like Judas Iscariot's suicide
in
Acts 1:18? I'll throw SUCH a fit if that passage isn't included
in
this enlightened plan for our youngsters' edification. Didn't
that bit
of inspiration add a memorable flavor to the second Silence of the
Lambs installment? Kids are sleighted if they don't know where
their
favorite snuff films came from.
I want them taught the part with Lot fucking his daughters and
getting them pregnant.
Why?
Because it's in the Bible. Why not?
So, why is that the only part you want taught, abortion fool?
No, but it's a good start.
Is that what your dad did to you?
No. You?
Stay on the subject, *****.
That IS the subject. You brought it up. Is that a yes?
AND, funny thing is Lot's daughters were who came up with the idea,
and they were NOT for ABORTING the babies inside them.
Who cares?
Everyone who respects the truth.
People that respect the truth don't care. See, they CHOSE to get
pregnant and CHOSE to have the kids.
How soon you forget the rest of the story, huh?
The gist of the story is plenty. Incest breeding in the Bible. Nice.
To you?
Incest isn't the gist of the story.
Yes, it is. Getting their father drunk so they could have sex with him?
No one respects an idiot, disrespectful coward such as yourself who
tries to attribute shame to something that has no shame in it.
Oh, so there's no shame in incest? Do tell.
In this case there is no shame in it.
Dude, they got their father drunk, had sex with him and had his kids.
Yuck.
So what?
Are you such a pervert against children that you can do nothing but try
to act as if there is sin in something that was NECESSARY?
So there's no sin in abortion if it's necessary?
Why must you take everything so personally?
Abortion on the case of reape was legal before 1973.
if you turn face this time, get your god damned unstable idiot mind out of
my face.
Read the whole story.
There were no other men in the area for them to become pregnant by.
There were no men left on the planet? Do tell.
Read it.
Why are you asking me?
Do you want to be treated as if you actually know something or do you
want to go around acting like some ignorant fool who has no
understanding?
You think there were airplanes back then or cars or busses or fetility
clinics(AI)?
Once again: there were no men on the planet? Do tell.
I do not need your god damned idiot questions at my face, idiot.
Meltdown in 5...4...3...2...
Get a clue and stop being such a god damned rebellious *****.
I am not a hte-filled ntolerant *****.
That is your agenda, your role, your duty in life as you seek to make men go
to war for your GOD DAMNED enrichment.
And, I will see you die if that is indeed the truth, and I will laugh about
it.
Why don't you spare yourself the humiliation once in a while and just
admit you're wrong?
When will you start learning something about LIFE itself instead of
arguing to kill it?
--
--sexkitten--
Sneechres and the art of projection- part 3
1130732777.897897.129520@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Psychologists call it"leveling." You either have to inflate your own
sense of self-worth
somehow or try and bring others down to you.
1414fd53.0402042145.2faac5c9@posting.google.com
you're a *****
1414fd53.0301242012.7786001e@posting.google.com
*I* said you were a *****, and you are
1414fd53.0201151612.5d801f91@posting.google.com
I don't own a vibrator,*****.
1414fd53.0312142051.5e760545@posting.google.com
you stupid *****
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: Bringing the Bible back to the classroom |
06 Oct 2006 11:54:19 PM |
|
|
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eqmdnT64Fei9r7rYnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:AtidnZWMBPi8sbrYnZ2dnUVZ_tydnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:osOdnT1tJ8-XhrrYnZ2dnUVZ_u2dnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Fcednd4LzdXh2LjYnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:qNydneFXErPG4bnYnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Z6adnVkn0ZCD7rnYnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@giganews.com...
Father Haskell wrote:
J Young wrote:
The Bible should be taught in every classroom in America. The
literary
qualities alone are sufficient enough reason to do so. America
can not spend
her energies catering to the crying of the Jews
Jesus heard that.
and the Atheists,
He heard that, too. He's on our side now, you know.
both of
whom have an aversion to anything Christian. The overwhelming
majority of
people embrace the Bible and should have cause to expect it to
be taught to
our children.
Including the patently gory parts, like Judas Iscariot's suicide
in
Acts 1:18? I'll throw SUCH a fit if that passage isn't included
in
this enlightened plan for our youngsters' edification. Didn't
that bit
of inspiration add a memorable flavor to the second Silence of
the
Lambs installment? Kids are sleighted if they don't know where
their
favorite snuff films came from.
I want them taught the part with Lot fucking his daughters and
getting them pregnant.
Why?
Because it's in the Bible. Why not?
So, why is that the only part you want taught, abortion fool?
No, but it's a good start.
Is that what your dad did to you?
No. You?
Stay on the subject, *****.
That IS the subject. You brought it up. Is that a yes?
AND, funny thing is Lot's daughters were who came up with the
idea, and they were NOT for ABORTING the babies inside them.
Who cares?
Everyone who respects the truth.
People that respect the truth don't care. See, they CHOSE to get
pregnant and CHOSE to have the kids.
How soon you forget the rest of the story, huh?
The gist of the story is plenty. Incest breeding in the Bible.
Nice.
To you?
Incest isn't the gist of the story.
Yes, it is. Getting their father drunk so they could have sex with
him?
No one respects an idiot, disrespectful coward such as yourself who
tries to attribute shame to something that has no shame in it.
Oh, so there's no shame in incest? Do tell.
In this case there is no shame in it.
Dude, they got their father drunk, had sex with him and had his kids.
Yuck.
So what?
Are you such a pervert against children that you can do nothing but try
to act as if there is sin in something that was NECESSARY?
So there's no sin in abortion if it's necessary?
Why must you take everything so personally?
Abortion on the case of reape was legal before 1973.
if you turn face this time, get your god damned unstable idiot mind out
of my face.
Read the whole story.
There were no other men in the area for them to become pregnant by.
There were no men left on the planet? Do tell.
Read it.
Why are you asking me?
Do you want to be treated as if you actually know something or do you
want to go around acting like some ignorant fool who has no
understanding?
You think there were airplanes back then or cars or busses or fetility
clinics(AI)?
Once again: there were no men on the planet? Do tell.
I do not need your god damned idiot questions at my face, idiot.
Meltdown in 5...4...3...2...
Yeah.
You..
The fires can get so hot that you can melt.
Get a clue and stop being such a god damned rebellious *****.
I am not a hte-filled ntolerant *****.
That is your agenda, your role, your duty in life as you seek to make men
go to war for your GOD DAMNED enrichment.
And, I will see you die if that is indeed the truth, and I will laugh
about it.
Why don't you spare yourself the humiliation once in a while and just
admit you're wrong?
I am not humiliated, you resistant, contentious woman.
Or are you a man posing as a woman to support klling unborn humans on
demand?
You are destned for a much worse hell than others if you are actually a god
damned liar in addition to every other bad thing you stand for in here.
I await your metldown.
LOL!
I am not in fear of it, you idiot.
When will you start learning something about LIFE itself instead of
arguing to kill it?
--
--sexkitten--
Sneechres and the art of projection- part 3
1130732777.897897.129520@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Psychologists call it"leveling." You either have to inflate your own
sense of self-worth
somehow or try and bring others down to you.
1414fd53.0402042145.2faac5c9@posting.google.com
you're a *****
1414fd53.0301242012.7786001e@posting.google.com
*I* said you were a *****, and you are
1414fd53.0201151612.5d801f91@posting.google.com
I don't own a vibrator,*****.
1414fd53.0312142051.5e760545@posting.google.com
you stupid *****
.
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: Bringing the Bible back to the classroom |
07 Oct 2006 12:01:08 AM |
|
|
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eqmdnT64Fei9r7rYnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:AtidnZWMBPi8sbrYnZ2dnUVZ_tydnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:osOdnT1tJ8-XhrrYnZ2dnUVZ_u2dnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Fcednd4LzdXh2LjYnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:qNydneFXErPG4bnYnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@giganews.com...
John D. Wentzky wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <jumpingbeanazNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Z6adnVkn0ZCD7rnYnZ2dnUVZ_qudnZ2d@giganews.com...
Father Haskell wrote:
J Young wrote:
The Bible should be taught in every classroom in America. The
literary
qualities alone are sufficient enough reason to do so. America
can not spend
her energies catering to the crying of the Jews
Jesus heard that.
and the Atheists,
He heard that, too. He's on our side now, you know.
both of
whom have an aversion to anything Christian. The overwhelming
majority of
people embrace the Bible and should have cause to expect it to
be taught to
our children.
Including the patently gory parts, like Judas Iscariot's suicide
in
Acts 1:18? I'll throw SUCH a fit if that passage isn't included
in
this enlightened plan for our youngsters' edification. Didn't
that bit
of inspiration add a memorable flavor to the second Silence of
the
Lambs installment? Kids are sleighted if they don't know where
their
favorite snuff films came from.
I want them taught the part with Lot fucking his daughters and
getting them pregnant.
Why?
Because it's in the Bible. Why not?
So, why is that the only part you want taught, abortion fool?
No, but it's a good start.
Is that what your dad did to you?
No. You?
Stay on the subject, *****.
That IS the subject. You brought it up. Is that a yes?
AND, funny thing is Lot's daughters were who came up with the
idea, and they were NOT for ABORTING the babies inside them.
Who cares?
Everyone who respects the truth.
People that respect the truth don't care. See, they CHOSE to get
pregnant and CHOSE to have the kids.
How soon you forget the rest of the story, huh?
The gist of the story is plenty. Incest breeding in the Bible.
Nice.
To you?
Incest isn't the gist of the story.
Yes, it is. Getting their father drunk so they could have sex with
him?
No one respects an idiot, disrespectful coward such as yourself who
tries to attribute shame to something that has no shame in it.
Oh, so there's no shame in incest? Do tell.
In this case there is no shame in it.
Dude, they got their father drunk, had sex with him and had his kids.
Yuck.
So what?
Are you such a pervert against children that you can do nothing but try
to act as if there is sin in something that was NECESSARY?
So there's no sin in abortion if it's necessary?
Why must you take everything so personally?
Abortion on the case of reape was legal before 1973.
if you turn face this time, get your god damned unstable idiot mind out
of my face.
Read the whole story.
There were no other men in the area for them to become pregnant by.
There were no men left on the planet? Do tell.
Read it.
Why are you asking me?
Do you want to be treated as if you actually know something or do you
want to go around acting like some ignorant fool who has no
understanding?
You think there were airplanes back then or cars or busses or fetility
clinics(AI)?
Once again: there were no men on the planet? Do tell.
I do not need your god damned idiot questions at my face, idiot.
Meltdown in 5...4...3...2...
Yeah.
You..
The fires can get so hot that you can melt.
Don't play with matches then.
Get a clue and stop being such a god damned rebellious *****.
I am not a hte-filled ntolerant *****.
That is your agenda, your role, your duty in life as you seek to make men
go to war for your GOD DAMNED enrichment.
And, I will see you die if that is indeed the truth, and I will laugh
about it.
Why don't you spare yourself the humiliation once in a while and just
admit you're wrong?
I am not humiliated, you resistant, contentious woman.
Yes, you are, or you wouldn't be throwing a tantrum.
Or are you a man posing as a woman to support klling unborn humans on
demand?
<yawn>
Now THAT was pathetic.
You are destned for a much worse hell than others if you are actually a god
damned liar in addition to every other bad thing you stand for in here.
I await your metldown.
You'll be waiting a long, long, long, long time, Johnny.
LOL!
I am not in fear of it, you idiot.
When will you start learning something about LIFE itself instead of
arguing to kill it?
--
--sexkitten--
Sneechres and the art of projection- part 3
1130732777.897897.129520@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Psychologists call it"leveling." You either have to inflate your own
sense of self-worth
somehow or try and bring others down to you.
1414fd53.0402042145.2faac5c9@posting.google.com
you're a *****
1414fd53.0301242012.7786001e@posting.google.com
*I* said you were a *****, and you are
1414fd53.0201151612.5d801f91@posting.google.com
I don't own a vibrator,*****.
1414fd53.0312142051.5e760545@posting.google.com
you stupid *****
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Chellie" |
|
| Title: Re: Bringing the Bible back to the classroom |
08 Oct 2006 11:32:02 PM |
|
|
--sexkitten-- wrote:
So there's no sin in abortion if it's necessary?
I know abortion is a testy subject but I don't believe in it for no
reason. Yes if a woman gets pregnant through rape many believe she has
the right to get an abortion. Even in this case I am against it. I
know.. I know...
Also some women have the tubal pregnancy where the egg doesn't make it
through where it's suppose to go and then the egg/embryo is stuck. If
not taken care of, the woman can die. Hard decision to make but some
may say no it's not. Just abort the baby and the woman can try again...
I see this as cruel. I can see the next question: So let the woman and
the unborn child both die? Very hard decision. I know many don't
believe in this but PRAYER. God can help in this situation but you must
have the faith and belief. If not, go to the doctor and get the
abortion. The choice is yours but that woman will have to answer to
God. Like I mentioned before: it's a testy subject.
And if anyone is wondering, yes I have been pregnant and was in a
situation where I had to either say no to man's medications/surgeries
and trust God. I trusted God. I was 3 months pregnant and if I didn't
get the surgery needed, me and my child would have died, so the doctors
say. Now my son is 8 months old and very healthy. So yes, I have
experienced this horrid ordeal and I can speak from experience. I had
another situation when I was 21. I have a blood condition which can be
ridden of IF I get a splenectomy (spleen removal). Also my life is in
danger because of the blood condition, my blood level is very low. I
refused and I was suppose to die but I am 29 and still going. Also if I
was to get the splenectomy, I would have to live on penicillin for the
rest of my life and if I missed a dose, I could die. I just trust in
God. It's much easier.
Striving to perfection and holiness in Jesus Christ,
Chellie
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Bringing the Bible back to the classroom |
09 Oct 2006 01:30:58 PM |
|
|
"Chellie" <TNotch1@aol.com> wro | | | | | | | | | | | |
