Religions > Atheism > Brunson pledges support for CP, promises to be vocal about moral ...
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
22 Feb 2006 10:54:41 AM |
| Object: |
Brunson pledges support for CP, promises to be vocal about moral ... |
Brunson pledges support for CP, promises to be vocal about moral ...
http://www.floridabaptistwitness.com/5516.article
Florida Baptist Witness - Jacksonville,FL,USA
On public policy issues, Brunson said he is aware First Baptist,
Jacksonville, collected a large number of petitions in support of a
marriage amendment to Florida?s constitution which leaders believe will
earn enough signatures to be placed on the 2008 ballot.
?I will be vocal and will give leadership for conservatives in that area,
for Baptists in that area,? Brunson told the Witness. In a press conference
after the interview, Brunson told a reporter he intends to stay involved in
public policy issues involving morality.
?I?m just a preacher and this is just a church. And I realize that a lot of
things that we adhere to cross over into the political realm,? Brunson
said. ?I have a right to speak out. Some people will call that separation
of church and state. In the area of moral issues, I think that the church
has a command to speak out. And we will.?
***************************************************************
You are invited to check out the following:
The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm
American Theocrats - Past and Present
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm
The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
[and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
Church and State in general, listed below]
HRSepCnS · Hampton Roads [Virginia] SepChurch&State
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/
[Its not just Hampton Roads folks who are members, there are members from
all over the US and a couple from overseas as well]
***************************************************************
.. . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning. Words
take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why "a
page of history is worth a volume of logic." New York Trust Co. v. Eisner,
256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992)
.. . .
****************************************************************
USAF LT. COL (Ret) Buffman (Glen P. Goffin) wrote
"You pilot always into an unknown future;
facts are your only clue. Get the facts!"
That philosophy 'snipit' helped to get me, and my crew, through a good
many combat missions and far too many scary, inflight, emergencies.
It has also played a significant role in helping me to expose the
plethora of radical Christian propaganda and lies that we find at
almost every media turn.
*****************************************************************
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE:
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
****************************************************************
.
|
|
| User: "Gray Shockley" |
|
| Title: Re: Brunson pledges support for CP, promises to be vocal about moral ... |
25 Feb 2006 06:42:29 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 10:54:41 -0600, wrote:
Brunson pledges support for CP, promises to be vocal about moral ...
I had to, immediately, go to the URL to find out who Brunson is and why he
"promises to be vocal about moral issues" and why he supports the Communist
Party.
Oh, different CP.
++ gray (oh, okay)
http://www.floridabaptistwitness.com/5516.article
Florida Baptist Witness - Jacksonville,FL,USA
On public policy issues, Brunson said he is aware First Baptist,
Jacksonville, collected a large number of petitions in support of a
marriage amendment to Florida?s constitution which leaders believe will
earn enough signatures to be placed on the 2008 ballot.
?I will be vocal and will give leadership for conservatives in that area,
for Baptists in that area,? Brunson told the Witness. In a press conference
after the interview, Brunson told a reporter he intends to stay involved in
public policy issues involving morality.
?I?m just a preacher and this is just a church. And I realize that a lot of
things that we adhere to cross over into the political realm,? Brunson
said. ?I have a right to speak out. Some people will call that separation
of church and state. In the area of moral issues, I think that the church
has a command to speak out. And we will.?
***************************************************************
You are invited to check out the following:
The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm
American Theocrats - Past and Present
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm
The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
[and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
Church and State in general, listed below]
HRSepCnS · Hampton Roads [Virginia] SepChurch&State
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/
[Its not just Hampton Roads folks who are members, there are members from
all over the US and a couple from overseas as well]
***************************************************************
. . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning. Words
take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why "a
page of history is worth a volume of logic." New York Trust Co. v. Eisner,
256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992)
. . .
****************************************************************
USAF LT. COL (Ret) Buffman (Glen P. Goffin) wrote
"You pilot always into an unknown future;
facts are your only clue. Get the facts!"
That philosophy 'snipit' helped to get me, and my crew, through a good
many combat missions and far too many scary, inflight, emergencies.
It has also played a significant role in helping me to expose the
plethora of radical Christian propaganda and lies that we find at
almost every media turn.
*****************************************************************
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE:
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
****************************************************************
.
|
|
|
| User: " torresD" |
|
| Title: Israel has no 'right to exist' - By Bradley Burston |
25 Feb 2006 10:47:34 PM |
|
|
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=686185&contrassID=2
Israel has no 'right to exist'
By Bradley Burston
Friday, 24 February (523)
(32 days to election day)
Today's quiz:
Nearly 200 nations hold
membership in the United Nations.
How many have a right to exist?
Let's ask the question differently.
How many of the world body's member states
have a capital which even its closest ally
cannot bring itself to recognize?
This is it.
One hundred and ninety-one nations,
and only one lacks the "right to exist"
in the eyes of fellow states.
No other country even has a "right to exist."
No other country needs one.
Next up:
What does a country have to do to
lose its inherent right to exist?
A cautionary note.
This is a trick question.
If you answered genocide,
arguably the worst-case scenario,
you'd be way wrong.
No one questions Turkey's right to exist.
This after the deaths of more than
a million Armenians beginning in 1915.
Nor did they expect Cambodia,
which under the Khmer Rouge may
have killed 2,000,000 people,
to lose its membership in the
community of nations.
Pakistan has no right-to-exist issue.
This, after Bangladesh, 1971.
The Rape of Nanking during Japan's
wartime occupation of China?
Japan gets to stay on the map.
Germany?
Let's not even go there.
So why is it so hard for some people
to recognize the right of Israel to exist?
A.
The Jews have no need of -
and therefore no right to -
a state of their own because,
as it is,
they own everything,
in particular the banks
and the mass media,
and because everything they don't own,
they somehow control.
B.
The occupation of Palestine is the
greatest crime in the history of man's
inhumanity to the innocent.
C.
The very existence of Israel constitutes
the signal humiliation of the Arab Muslim
peoples in the modern era.
D.
Only Muslims are allowed to conquer,
occupy, claim, annex and govern territory,
especially in areas where they have conquered,
claimed, and annexed in the past.
E.
No Muslim state is genuinely
willing to help the Palestinians,
so, in the end, Israel will have to do so.
The correct answer is, of course, "Yes."
There's an oddly fitting coda to the
circumstance that Israel can't seem
to render itself legitimate.
The longer and harder that
Palestinian hardliners dig
in their heels in resisting
recognition of the Jewish state,
the less legitimacy the cause of
Palestinian statehood has in the
eyes of the world.
The irony is that for years and years,
Palestine basked in formal recognition
even as it lacked statehood,
while Israel had full statehood
but lacked full recognition.
Hamas must now come to grips
with the possibility that if
it insists on withholding
recognition of Israel's right
to exist as a nation,
some of the Palestinians' traditional
allies in Europe and elsewhere may
begin to withhold recognition of the
right of Palestine to exist as a future nation.
Recognition being a two-way street,
it comes naturally neither to the
Israelis nor the Palestinians,
both peoples of late being more
inclined to erect barricades than bridges.
But the two peoples can make a start.
For our part,
we can quit crooning the old saw that goes
"There is no Palestine
/There is no Palestinian People
/ There are no Palestinians."
We can, in short,
recognize their right to exist.
At some point,
whether we like it or not,
whether they like it or not,
they'll recognize our right
to exist as well.
In the meantime, in small increments and,
at times, for the wrong reasons -
like being told we should be erased -
we're heading gradually toward true
membership in the community of nations.
Like it or not.
It's only a matter of time
before we're like all the others.
We'll exist without any right to.
Just like all the others.
__________________________________
.
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|