BS about KRP Forgeries



 Religions > Atheism > BS about KRP Forgeries

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Nomen Nescio"
Date: 19 Dec 2005 09:00:04 PM
Object: BS about KRP Forgeries
I can see the forgeries made by others of the name Pangborn and
blocked them.
It isn't KRP forging his own name, he requested I block
forgeries of his name.
He knows I am blocking them.
He wouldn't then forge his own name through a remailer that he
knows blocks it.
I consider name forgeries to be abuse of my remailer.
Remailers are not operated to abuse others.
Some of you people need to get a life.
The person that wrote this is a very sick person.
"Can some one please come to 3980 Orchard Hill Circle in Palm
Harbor and
rape my wife Barbara. THe ***** needs it badly."
Examples of a few blocks from today: (the * are wildcards)
These messages would have come out with the author name of
Pangborn.
00:38 Sending 28 messages [53]
Destination Blocked: to: *angborn* (deleted)
03:08 Sending 30 messages [40]
Destination Blocked: to: *angborn* (deleted)
Grow up trolls.
.

User: "Nomen Nescio"

Title: Re: BS about KRP Forgeries 22 Dec 2005 01:00:05 PM
KRP wrote:

Look Rich I ignore a great deal of it. If you have missed that. I hit
maybe 3 in 10 for a reply. Depending on content.

I suppose if your definition of "ignore" includes whining about how you're
not replying to 20 posts from someone one day, then replying to all 20
of them the very next day, then you have a point.
For some reason my copy of Websters Unabridged omits that entry....???
You CLAIM that you're going to ignore the garbage, but you never seem to
follow through on those claims with any more reliability than you follow
through on any of the other empty claims and promises you've made from
behind the safety of your keyboard.
Face it Ken, you don't have the ability to stop. You're addicted to
Usenet, and revel in the abuse. Your life is so horrid this is the only
place you feel "comfortable", in spite of the fact that you're nothing but
an object of ridicule and disgust.
It's nauseatingly pathetic, but I have no delusions of it ever changing. :(
.
User: "Enkidu"

Title: Re: BS about KRP Forgeries 22 Dec 2005 01:49:40 PM
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in
news:a7c69c07625b9a39ac20d820eaf027b3@dizum.com:

KRP wrote:

Look Rich I ignore a great deal of it. If you have missed that. I hit
maybe 3 in 10 for a reply. Depending on content.


I suppose if your definition of "ignore" includes whining about how
you're not replying to 20 posts from someone one day, then replying to
all 20 of them the very next day, then you have a point.

For some reason my copy of Websters Unabridged omits that entry....???

You CLAIM that you're going to ignore the garbage, but you never seem
to follow through on those claims with any more reliability than you
follow through on any of the other empty claims and promises you've
made from behind the safety of your keyboard.

Face it Ken, you don't have the ability to stop. You're addicted to
Usenet, and revel in the abuse. Your life is so horrid this is the
only place you feel "comfortable", in spite of the fact that you're
nothing but an object of ridicule and disgust.

It's nauseatingly pathetic, but I have no delusions of it ever
changing. :(

And this, children, sums up Kenny. There is nothing more one could add.
--
Enkidu AA#2165
http://www.musings.leaddogs.org/
EAC Chaplain and ordained minister,
ULC, Modesto, CA
PGP ID: 0xC4CE8CF0
Religious hatreds ought not to be propagated at all, but certainly not on
a tax-exempt basis.
-- James A. Michene
.


User: " KRP"

Title: Re: BS about KRP Forgeries by DAVID MOORE 21 Dec 2005 08:40:38 AM
"Nomen Nescio" <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:929e3978c60305c445c24015e70a3936@dizum.com...

I can see the forgeries made by others of the name Pangborn and
blocked them.
It isn't KRP forging his own name, he requested I block
forgeries of his name.
He knows I am blocking them.
He wouldn't then forge his own name through a remailer that he
knows blocks it.
I consider name forgeries to be abuse of my remailer.
Remailers are not operated to abuse others.
Some of you people need to get a life.

The person that wrote this is a very sick person.
"Can some one please come to 3980 Orchard Hill Circle in Palm Harbor and
rape my wife Barbara. THe ***** needs it badly."

This is amazing. Davey plays the role of POOR VICTIM and then plays the role
of MACHO BADASS, but he claims his family is being threatened. Yet NOWHERE
on the net do you see photos of **HIS** house. Nowhere do you see calls for
harm to HIS wife and children BY NAME.... Much less the CONSTANT running
attacks of MY family over the past 7 years, AND the desperate appeals in the
sexual deviant newsgroups such as the last paragraph above - or pretending
to be from my ex-wife and my present wife BEGGING to be attacked. Davey
plays the poor innocent victim - but WHY is it that only MY family is
attacked???
.

User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: BS about KRP Forgeries 19 Dec 2005 11:09:56 PM
In <929e3978c60305c445c24015e70a3936@dizum.com>, Nomen Nescio
<nobody@dizum.com> wrote:

Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender
address above. It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer
software. Please report problems or inappropriate use to the remailer
administrator at <abuse@dizum.com>.

The admin of an anonymizer is anonymizing his own messages so... nobody
will believe he's the admin?
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"We need everything you've got"
http://makeashorterlink.com/?R2726554C
Forgotten Already
http://makeashorterlink.com/?H1233272C
Feds are treating Louisiana like enemy
"...it may be that they may have written us off."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?O21E51C1C
http://www.nola.com
.
User: "Borked Pseudo Mailed"

Title: Re: BS about KRP Forgeries 20 Dec 2005 12:24:14 AM
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, "Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:

In <929e3978c60305c445c24015e70a3936@dizum.com>, Nomen Nescio
<nobody@dizum.com> wrote:

The admin of an anonymizer is anonymizing his own messages so... nobody
will believe he's the admin?

--
Mark K. Bilbo

Gawd are you stupid. You can't see the forest for the trees. You think I am
Ken too? If you do, welcome to the Girlie Scouts.
.
User: " KRP"

Title: Re: BS about KRP Forgeries 21 Dec 2005 08:48:57 AM
"Borked Pseudo Mailed" <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote in message
news:0e0308e1c1daa1a4626b5ff61044c429@pseudo.borked.net...

On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, "Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:

In <929e3978c60305c445c24015e70a3936@dizum.com>, Nomen Nescio
<nobody@dizum.com> wrote:

The admin of an anonymizer is anonymizing his own messages so... nobody
will believe he's the admin?

--
Mark K. Bilbo



Gawd are you stupid. You can't see the forest for the trees. You think I
am
Ken too? If you do, welcome to the Girlie Scouts.

Rich I am loving this.. You're wasting your time here.
.

User: "Syd M."

Title: Re: BS about KRP Forgeries 20 Dec 2005 09:17:40 AM

Gawd are you stupid. You can't see the forest for the trees. You think I am
Ken too? If you do, welcome to the Girlie Scouts.

You might as well add me too, Pangbum..
I think it's you too.
PDW
.
User: "Nomen Nescio"

Title: Re: BS about KRP Forgeries 22 Dec 2005 12:30:06 PM
KRP wrote:


"Borked Pseudo Mailed" <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote in message
news:76a880ad086af93ad9c74c0bfa09e42b@pseudo.borked.net...

that

it is a QUOTE.............................. Of course a reasonably
intelligent person MIGHT see that a later post can be made identical to
the
original IF the guy has saved the text as a macro.


Um.....false.


Nope look at two things..... The TEXT from ME at the bottom of MY
POST...................... Did you MISS the HTML coding in there? Then

Only because no such formatting EXISTS, liar.

read the headers and see the REFERENCE MESSAGE ID.. See them? You see
when you post an ORIGINAL there is NO REFERENCE ID...

All that proves is you're too stupid to diddle the References: header when
you're accidentally reposting your forgeries from your own account. Not a
big surprise at all really.


When a message gets quoted, on a newsgroup or in e-mail, the universal
standard is that this is signified by a ">" before the line(s) of text.
There's nothing like that in the part of your message which is in
question.


Doesn't appear if somewhere along the way somebody replied in HTML.

Which NOBODY did.
This is even more amusing than your "International Dateline" time zone
fabrication, ya' fat *****. What's next, alien invaders used an anal probe
to force you into making the forgery?
LOL!
You really are a ***** poor liar Kenny.
.
User: " KRP"

Title: Re: BS about KRP Forgeries 23 Dec 2005 03:18:30 AM
DAVID THE TWERP MOORE
"Nomen Nescio" <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:71e2a76dd3b8e2372d97a89d5528fc93@dizum.com...

that

it is a QUOTE.............................. Of course a reasonably
intelligent person MIGHT see that a later post can be made identical to
the
original IF the guy has saved the text as a macro.


Um.....false.


Nope look at two things..... The TEXT from ME at the bottom of MY
POST...................... Did you MISS the HTML coding in there? Then


Only because no such formatting EXISTS, liar.

read the headers and see the REFERENCE MESSAGE ID.. See them? You see
when you post an ORIGINAL there is NO REFERENCE ID...


All that proves is you're too stupid to diddle the References: header when
you're accidentally reposting your forgeries from your own account. Not a
big surprise at all really.

HA HA HA ! THANKS for admitting it Davey'
.


User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: BS about KRP Forgeries 20 Dec 2005 09:41:36 AM
In <1135091860.635989.71580@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, "Syd M."
<pdwright42@yahoo.com> wrote:

Gawd are you stupid. You can't see the forest for the trees. You think I
am Ken too? If you do, welcome to the Girlie Scouts.


You might as well add me too, Pangbum.. I think it's you too.

Me thinks he doth protest too much. I didn't say I thought it was
Pangborn. I said I don't believe its the admin of the remailer.
Hm....
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"We need everything you've got"
http://makeashorterlink.com/?R2726554C
Forgotten Already
http://makeashorterlink.com/?H1233272C
Feds are treating Louisiana like enemy
"...it may be that they may have written us off."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?O21E51C1C
http://www.nola.com
.
User: "Syd M."

Title: Re: BS about KRP Forgeries 20 Dec 2005 12:23:54 PM

Mark K. Bilbo

"Syd M." <pdwrigh...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Gawd are you stupid. You can't see the forest for the trees. You think I
am Ken too? If you do, welcome to the Girlie Scouts.

You might as well add me too, Pangbum.. I think it's you too.

Me thinks he doth protest too much. I didn't say I thought it was
Pangborn. I said I don't believe its the admin of the remailer.
Hm....

Hmm.. Seems Kenny is feeling paranoid.
Now, why would that be, I wonder..?
PDW
.
User: "John Baker"

Title: Re: BS about KRP Forgeries 20 Dec 2005 04:33:19 PM
On 20 Dec 2005 10:23:54 -0800, "Syd M." <pdwright42@yahoo.com> wrote:

Mark K. Bilbo

"Syd M." <pdwrigh...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Gawd are you stupid. You can't see the forest for the trees. You think I
am Ken too? If you do, welcome to the Girlie Scouts.


You might as well add me too, Pangbum.. I think it's you too.




Me thinks he doth protest too much. I didn't say I thought it was
Pangborn. I said I don't believe its the admin of the remailer.


Hm....


Hmm.. Seems Kenny is feeling paranoid.
Now, why would that be, I wonder..?

Kenny's been caught red-handed so many times it isn't even funny.


PDW

.
User: " KRP"

Title: Re: BS about KRP Forgeries 21 Dec 2005 08:56:18 AM
"John Baker" <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:ok1hq1hqsr4jg4ravqi5be0ie1uho3arm4@4ax.com...

On 20 Dec 2005 10:23:54 -0800, "Syd M." <pdwright42@yahoo.com> wrote:

Mark K. Bilbo

"Syd M." <pdwrigh...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Gawd are you stupid. You can't see the forest for the trees. You think
I
am Ken too? If you do, welcome to the Girlie Scouts.


You might as well add me too, Pangbum.. I think it's you too.




Me thinks he doth protest too much. I didn't say I thought it was
Pangborn. I said I don't believe its the admin of the remailer.


Hm....


Hmm.. Seems Kenny is feeling paranoid.
Now, why would that be, I wonder..?


Kenny's been caught red-handed so many times it isn't even funny.

No you are simply full of *****. Go back over in GOOGLE the posts you
**THINK** prove I am the forger. Read VERY carefully. It's a waste of time
to ask, NONE of you people in AA can read headers... But look VERY
carefully. You will see that MY post is a QUOTE of an earlier forgery. NONE
of you (in AA) have anywhere near the IQ to figure out that there was an
earlier identical forged post much less have NY hope of finding it. If *I*
post it you'll just say it was a fake. Moore often makes multiples of a post
over days. Sometimes having a bot generate 20 or 30 copies of a forgery
spaced out over hours or even days. But I will NOT waste my time trying to
explain that to people who haven't a clue about this stuff. And it was
something I missed for a long time myself. look at the MESSAGE
ID's............. Not also that IF you look at MY post you can see two
things, it contains TEXT showing it is a reply to somebody's comments on the
earlier forgery - AND you can see that in the formatting of the message that
it is a QUOTE.............................. Of course a reasonably
intelligent person MIGHT see that a later post can be made identical to the
original IF the guy has saved the text as a macro.

.
User: "Borked Pseudo Mailed"

Title: Re: BS about KRP Forgeries 21 Dec 2005 09:12:30 AM
" KRP" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote:

"John Baker" <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:ok1hq1hqsr4jg4ravqi5be0ie1uho3arm4@4ax.com...

On 20 Dec 2005 10:23:54 -0800, "Syd M." <pdwright42@yahoo.com> wrote:

Mark K. Bilbo

"Syd M." <pdwrigh...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Gawd are you stupid. You can't see the forest for the trees. You think
I
am Ken too? If you do, welcome to the Girlie Scouts.


You might as well add me too, Pangbum.. I think it's you too.




Me thinks he doth protest too much. I didn't say I thought it was
Pangborn. I said I don't believe its the admin of the remailer.


Hm....


Hmm.. Seems Kenny is feeling paranoid.
Now, why would that be, I wonder..?


Kenny's been caught red-handed so many times it isn't even funny.



No you are simply full of *****. Go back over in GOOGLE the posts you
**THINK** prove I am the forger. Read VERY carefully. It's a waste of time
to ask, NONE of you people in AA can read headers... But look VERY
carefully. You will see that MY post is a QUOTE of an earlier forgery. NONE
of you (in AA) have anywhere near the IQ to figure out that there was an
earlier identical forged post much less have NY hope of finding it. If *I*
post it you'll just say it was a fake. Moore often makes multiples of a post
over days. Sometimes having a bot generate 20 or 30 copies of a forgery
spaced out over hours or even days. But I will NOT waste my time trying to
explain that to people who haven't a clue about this stuff. And it was
something I missed for a long time myself. look at the MESSAGE
ID's............. Not also that IF you look at MY post you can see two
things, it contains TEXT showing it is a reply to somebody's comments on the
earlier forgery - AND you can see that in the formatting of the message that
it is a QUOTE.............................. Of course a reasonably
intelligent person MIGHT see that a later post can be made identical to the
original IF the guy has saved the text as a macro.

Um.....false.
When a message gets quoted, on a newsgroup or in e-mail, the universal
standard is that this is signified by a ">" before the line(s) of text.
There's nothing like that in the part of your message which is in question.
Anyone who has any question about whether or not that's how messages get
quoted, they just have to look above that in the very same message, where
you were responding to Susan Cohen:

You mis-spelled "Ken"
:-)

Susan

And then *your* text:
And yopu misspelled DASVID MOORE the REAL author of that forgery. CHrist
but Moroe has found a treasure trove of IDIOTS in AA. You people can
always be counted on to dance.
This is taken directly from Google....no ">" in front of it whatsoever.
Not to mention, a week ago you were vehemently declaring that the
time-stamp on the forgery was altered, and that it came after. Only after
that was disproven did you switch your story to claiming that this was
"quoted".
Rich
.
User: " KRP"

Title: Re: BS about KRP Forgeries 22 Dec 2005 10:49:44 AM
"Borked Pseudo Mailed" <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote in message
news:76a880ad086af93ad9c74c0bfa09e42b@pseudo.borked.net...
that

it is a QUOTE.............................. Of course a reasonably
intelligent person MIGHT see that a later post can be made identical to
the
original IF the guy has saved the text as a macro.


Um.....false.

Nope look at two things..... The TEXT from ME at the bottom of MY
POST...................... Did you MISS the HTML coding in there?
Then read the headers and see the REFERENCE MESSAGE ID.. See them? You see
when you post an ORIGINAL there is NO REFERENCE ID...

When a message gets quoted, on a newsgroup or in e-mail, the universal
standard is that this is signified by a ">" before the line(s) of text.
There's nothing like that in the part of your message which is in
question.

Doesn't appear if somewhere along the way somebody replied in HTML.
.



User: "Syd M."

Title: Re: BS about KRP Forgeries 22 Dec 2005 12:02:04 AM

John Baker

Me thinks he doth protest too much. I didn't say I thought it was
Pangborn. I said I don't believe its the admin of the remailer.
Hm....

Hmm.. Seems Kenny is feeling paranoid.
Now, why would that be, I wonder..?
Kenny's been caught red-handed so many times it >isn't even funny.

Yeah. You'd think he'd at least TRY to come up with some new material..
PDW
.





User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: BS about KRP Forgeries 20 Dec 2005 09:13:22 AM
In <0e0308e1c1daa1a4626b5ff61044c429@pseudo.borked.net>, Borked Pseudo
Mailed <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote:

On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, "Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:

In <929e3978c60305c445c24015e70a3936@dizum.com>, Nomen Nescio
<nobody@dizum.com> wrote:

The admin of an anonymizer is anonymizing his own messages so... nobody
will believe he's the admin?

--
Mark K. Bilbo



Gawd are you stupid. You can't see the forest for the trees. You think I
am Ken too? If you do, welcome to the Girlie Scouts.

Actually, I don't care. Point is, an anonymous post is *anonymous. Get it?
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"We need everything you've got"
http://makeashorterlink.com/?R2726554C
Forgotten Already
http://makeashorterlink.com/?H1233272C
Feds are treating Louisiana like enemy
"...it may be that they may have written us off."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?O21E51C1C
http://www.nola.com
.
User: " KRP"

Title: Re: BS about KRP Forgeries 21 Dec 2005 08:50:13 AM
"Mark K. *****" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:jrGdnRud6LoSgjXeRVn-qw@megapath.net...

In <0e0308e1c1daa1a4626b5ff61044c429@pseudo.borked.net>, Borked Pseudo
Mailed <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote:

On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, "Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:

In <929e3978c60305c445c24015e70a3936@dizum.com>, Nomen Nescio
<nobody@dizum.com> wrote:

The admin of an anonymizer is anonymizing his own messages so... nobody
will believe he's the admin?

--
Mark K. Bilbo



Gawd are you stupid. You can't see the forest for the trees. You think I
am Ken too? If you do, welcome to the Girlie Scouts.


Actually, I don't care. Point is, an anonymous post is *anonymous. Get it?

Mark there is a REASON I alter your screen name to *****....... Some day you
may even figure out why. But you earn it every time you blame ME for the
forgeries.
You are *****-STUPID man! REALLY you are!
.
User: "Malibu Skipper"

Title: Re: BS about KRP Forgeries 21 Dec 2005 09:06:22 AM
KRP wrote:


Mark there is a REASON I alter your screen name to *****.......

Is it because you're twelve years old?
.

User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: BS about KRP Forgeries 21 Dec 2005 09:26:49 AM
In <FYdqf.6212$vJ4.4723@trnddc07>, " KRP" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote:


"Mark K. *****" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:jrGdnRud6LoSgjXeRVn-qw@megapath.net...

In <0e0308e1c1daa1a4626b5ff61044c429@pseudo.borked.net>, Borked Pseudo
Mailed <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote:

On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, "Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:

In <929e3978c60305c445c24015e70a3936@dizum.com>, Nomen Nescio
<nobody@dizum.com> wrote:

The admin of an anonymizer is anonymizing his own messages so... nobody
will believe he's the admin?

--
Mark K. Bilbo



Gawd are you stupid. You can't see the forest for the trees. You think
I am Ken too? If you do, welcome to the Girlie Scouts.


Actually, I don't care. Point is, an anonymous post is *anonymous. Get
it?



Mark there is a REASON I alter your screen name to *****....... Some day
you may even figure out why. But you earn it every time you blame ME for
the forgeries.
You are *****-STUPID man! REALLY you are!

Why are protesting something I didn't say?
Hm?
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"We need everything you've got"
http://makeashorterlink.com/?R2726554C
Forgotten Already
http://makeashorterlink.com/?H1233272C
Feds are treating Louisiana like enemy
"...it may be that they may have written us off."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?O21E51C1C
http://www.nola.com
.





User: "Enkidu"

Title: Re: BS about KRP Forgeries 19 Dec 2005 09:59:57 PM
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in
news:929e3978c60305c445c24015e70a3936@dizum.com:

Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address
above. It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the remailer
administrator at <abuse@dizum.com>. X-No-Archive: Yes

Nice try, Ken. We're not a bunch of 10 year old girl scouts, though.
--
Enkidu AA#2165
http://www.musings.leaddogs.org/
EAC Chaplain and ordained minister,
ULC, Modesto, CA
PGP ID: 0xC4CE8CF0
Over the years I've met a handful of people who regularly talk with God,
but they usually do so only when they're off their medications.
-- Harley Sorensen
.
User: "Borked Pseudo Mailed"

Title: Re: BS about KRP Forgeries 19 Dec 2005 10:30:19 PM
On 20 Dec 2005, Enkidu <jdwnx4702@sneakemail.com> wrote:

Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in
news:929e3978c60305c445c24015e70a3936@dizum.com:

Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address
above. It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the remailer
administrator at <abuse@dizum.com>. X-No-Archive: Yes


Nice try, Ken. We're not a bunch of 10 year old girl scouts, though.

Yes you are :) Maybe not even 10 years old.
You don't operate a remailer. I do.
This is what the Reliable Remailer send window shows.
03:08 Sending 30 messages [40]
Destination Blocked: to: *angborn* (deleted)
03:09 29 messages sent.
BTW, this is what the Mail SMTP Client shows.
23:09:38: processing job MO01A87A
Resolved MX for 'eocto.net' to 208.42.19.154
Connecting to 208.42.19.154
RCPT TO:<remailer@eocto.net>
DATA
[29476 bytes] Message accepted for delivery by 208.42.19.154.
23:09:44: 6 seconds elapsed, closing connection.
Go ahead, tell me I am Ken again.
.
User: " KRP"

Title: Re: BS about KRP Forgeries 21 Dec 2005 08:44:52 AM
"Borked Pseudo Mailed" <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote in message
news:fe95f08f9b1959930a330365dcafd49b@pseudo.borked.net...

On 20 Dec 2005, Enkidu <jdwnx4702@sneakemail.com> wrote:

Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in
news:929e3978c60305c445c24015e70a3936@dizum.com:

Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address
above. It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the remailer
administrator at <abuse@dizum.com>. X-No-Archive: Yes


Nice try, Ken. We're not a bunch of 10 year old girl scouts, though.


Yes you are :) Maybe not even 10 years old.
You don't operate a remailer. I do.

This is what the Reliable Remailer send window shows.

03:08 Sending 30 messages [40]
Destination Blocked: to: *angborn* (deleted)
03:09 29 messages sent.


BTW, this is what the Mail SMTP Client shows.

23:09:38: processing job MO01A87A
Resolved MX for 'eocto.net' to 208.42.19.154
Connecting to 208.42.19.154
RCPT TO:<remailer@eocto.net>
DATA
[29476 bytes] Message accepted for delivery by 208.42.19.154.
23:09:44: 6 seconds elapsed, closing connection.

Go ahead, tell me I am Ken again.

Yet lots seem to get through anyway.
.

User: "Enkidu"

Title: Re: BS about KRP Forgeries 19 Dec 2005 10:36:33 PM
Borked Pseudo Mailed <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote in
news:fe95f08f9b1959930a330365dcafd49b@pseudo.borked.net:

On 20 Dec 2005, Enkidu <jdwnx4702@sneakemail.com> wrote:

Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in
news:929e3978c60305c445c24015e70a3936@dizum.com:

Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address
above. It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer

software.

Please report problems or inappropriate use to the remailer
administrator at <abuse@dizum.com>. X-No-Archive: Yes


Nice try, Ken. We're not a bunch of 10 year old girl scouts, though.


Yes you are :) Maybe not even 10 years old.
You don't operate a remailer. I do.

This is what the Reliable Remailer send window shows.

03:08 Sending 30 messages [40]
Destination Blocked: to: *angborn* (deleted)
03:09 29 messages sent.


BTW, this is what the Mail SMTP Client shows.

23:09:38: processing job MO01A87A
Resolved MX for 'eocto.net' to 208.42.19.154
Connecting to 208.42.19.154
RCPT TO:<remailer@eocto.net>
DATA
[29476 bytes] Message accepted for delivery by 208.42.19.154.
23:09:44: 6 seconds elapsed, closing connection.

Go ahead, tell me I am Ken again.

Anyone can fake an address in a newsreader. Anyone can have any number
of email addresses that resolve or don't.
See ya, puppet.
--
Enkidu AA#2165
http://www.musings.leaddogs.org/
EAC Chaplain and ordained minister,
ULC, Modesto, CA
PGP ID: 0xC4CE8CF0
A priest is a man who is called "Father" by everyone except his own
children, who are obliged to call him "Uncle."
-- Italian saying
.


User: "Borked Pseudo Mailed"

Title: Re: BS about KRP Forgeries 19 Dec 2005 11:25:43 PM
On 20 Dec 2005, Enkidu <jdwnx4702@sneakemail.com> wrote:

Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in
news:929e3978c60305c445c24015e70a3936@dizum.com:

Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address
above. It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the remailer
administrator at <abuse@dizum.com>. X-No-Archive: Yes


Nice try, Ken. We're not a bunch of 10 year old girl scouts, though.

And, this is what the incoming mail window shows little girl sprout.
23:20:30: Job MG01A92A: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:20:32: Job MG01A92B: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:20:32: Job MG01A92C: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:20:46: Job MG01A937: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:20:59: Job MG01A938: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:21:01: Job MG01A939: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:21:36: Job MG01A93A: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:21:49: Job MG01A93B: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:21:52: Job MG01A93C: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:22:05: Job MG01A93D: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:22:18: Job MG01A93E: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:22:20: Job MG01A93F: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
Go ahead, tell me I am Ken again.
.
User: " KRP"

Title: Re: BS about KRP Forgeries 21 Dec 2005 08:47:19 AM
"Borked Pseudo Mailed" <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote in message
news:0eaf59e88615c9ead8fc6bbc7f2fddd6@pseudo.borked.net...

On 20 Dec 2005, Enkidu <jdwnx4702@sneakemail.com> wrote:

Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in
news:929e3978c60305c445c24015e70a3936@dizum.com:

Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address
above. It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the remailer
administrator at <abuse@dizum.com>. X-No-Archive: Yes


Nice try, Ken. We're not a bunch of 10 year old girl scouts, though.



And, this is what the incoming mail window shows little girl sprout.

Rich they are not AS bright as 10 year old girl scouts. MANY others have
pissed against the wall of stupidity that is the hallmark of the AA
newsgroup.
They don't collectively have enough live brain cells to understand a WORD
you said! They have their demon to believe in and NOTHING you can say will
persuade them otherwise. You are yelling at a MORON.
.
User: "Borked Pseudo Mailed"

Title: Re: BS about KRP Forgeries 21 Dec 2005 09:58:51 AM
" KRP" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote:

"Borked Pseudo Mailed" <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote in message
news:0eaf59e88615c9ead8fc6bbc7f2fddd6@pseudo.borked.net...

On 20 Dec 2005, Enkidu <jdwnx4702@sneakemail.com> wrote:

Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in
news:929e3978c60305c445c24015e70a3936@dizum.com:

Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address
above. It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the remailer
administrator at <abuse@dizum.com>. X-No-Archive: Yes


Nice try, Ken. We're not a bunch of 10 year old girl scouts, though.



And, this is what the incoming mail window shows little girl sprout.


Rich they are not AS bright as 10 year old girl scouts. MANY others have
pissed against the wall of stupidity that is the hallmark of the AA
newsgroup.
They don't collectively have enough live brain cells to understand a WORD
you said! They have their demon to believe in and NOTHING you can say will
persuade them otherwise. You are yelling at a MORON.

Hey, that wasn't me in the above post. I think you're at least partially
to blame for the nonsense which is going on, including some (but not all)
of the remailer forging.
I implore you again, why don't you ignore all of this stuff? Learn to use a
kill filter, or just unsubscribe from the newsgroups in question and let
others play with themselves.
Rich
.
User: " KRP"

Title: Re: BS about KRP Forgeries 22 Dec 2005 10:50:44 AM
"Borked Pseudo Mailed" <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote in message
news:0aa64cafb87cb7090a78329bb274220d@pseudo.borked.net...

" KRP" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote:

"Borked Pseudo Mailed" <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote in message
news:0eaf59e88615c9ead8fc6bbc7f2fddd6@pseudo.borked.net...

On 20 Dec 2005, Enkidu <jdwnx4702@sneakemail.com> wrote:

Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in
news:929e3978c60305c445c24015e70a3936@dizum.com:

Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address
above. It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the remailer
administrator at <abuse@dizum.com>. X-No-Archive: Yes


Nice try, Ken. We're not a bunch of 10 year old girl scouts, though.



And, this is what the incoming mail window shows little girl sprout.


Rich they are not AS bright as 10 year old girl scouts. MANY others have
pissed against the wall of stupidity that is the hallmark of the AA
newsgroup.
They don't collectively have enough live brain cells to understand a WORD
you said! They have their demon to believe in and NOTHING you can say will
persuade them otherwise. You are yelling at a MORON.


Hey, that wasn't me in the above post. I think you're at least partially
to blame for the nonsense which is going on, including some (but not all)
of the remailer forging.

I implore you again, why don't you ignore all of this stuff? Learn to use
a
kill filter, or just unsubscribe from the newsgroups in question and let
others play with themselves.

Look Rich I ignore a great deal of it. If you have missed that. I hit maybe
3 in 10 for a reply. Depending on content.
.




User: "Enkidu The Girl Scout"

Title: Re: BS about KRP Forgeries 19 Dec 2005 10:57:46 PM
On 20 Dec 2005, Enkidu <jdwnx4702@sneakemail.com> wrote:

Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in
news:929e3978c60305c445c24015e70a3936@dizum.com:

Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address
above. It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the remailer
administrator at <abuse@dizum.com>. X-No-Archive: Yes


Nice try, Ken. We're not a bunch of 10 year old girl scouts, though.

I think you are now proven a 10 year old girl scout :) Fun having your name
forged, isn't it?
23:22 Processing started
23:22 LTUK96C6.ML0 1 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 B4N3F4ZA.ML0 2 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 KLF65WAU.ML0 3 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 4I5K6ITQ.ML0 4 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 EAMBU0IC.ML0 5 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
Mixmaster: No valid recipients. (deleted)
23:22 TFX4RMMG.ML0 6 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
Mixmaster: No valid recipients. (deleted)
23:22 KVTTMH9S.ML0 7 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
Mixmaster: No valid recipients. (deleted)
23:22 9VK8WTY8.ML0 8 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 VRDE1MZ3.ML0 9 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 DT6J229C.ML0 10 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
Mixmaster: No valid recipients. (deleted)
23:22 XLVN0YB7.ML0 11 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 9N02KIRZ.ML0 12 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 1RYG45P0.ML0 13 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 66AV9W40.ML0 14 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 0C93L5FK.ML0 15 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 F2XKR8ZT.ML0 16 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
Message moved to MAILPROB folder
ERROR Critical processing error
File not found (C:\Rel\Mail\MAILPROB\TMTRR4.rel)
23:22 ERROR Message Disposal Error
File not found
23:22 PJ3Y39U5.ML0 17 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 UC22DXQ2.ML0 18 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 DQB7BNVM.ML0 19 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
Mixmaster: No valid recipients. (deleted)
23:22 RIG2XGHB.ML0 20 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 O6SUSPLV.ML0 21 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
Mixmaster: No valid recipients. (deleted)
23:22 MVY12EVW.ML0 22 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 6P869IA2.ML0 23 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 Building stats
23:23 Processing done.
23:25 Processing started
23:25 FH3JOQFO.ML0 1 of 12 (19-Dec-05 23:25)
23:25 W7EZSE1U.ML0 2 of 12 (19-Dec-05 23:25)
Mixmaster: No valid recipients. (deleted)
23:25 V94IDT6B.ML0 3 of 12 (19-Dec-05 23:25)
23:25 4SVYW99U.ML0 4 of 12 (19-Dec-05 23:25)
23:25 OIYB8M8Q.ML0 5 of 12 (19-Dec-05 23:25)
23:25 6JPU8CI3.ML0 6 of 12 (19-Dec-05 23:25)
23:25 E0NBFW59.ML0 7 of 12 (19-Dec-05 23:25)
23:25 OHA1HQGR.ML0 8 of 12 (19-Dec-05 23:25)
23:25 HZRKSHFV.ML0 9 of 12 (19-Dec-05 23:25)
23:25 JQBIKLJJ.ML0 10 of 12 (19-Dec-05 23:25)
Mixmaster: No valid recipients. (deleted)
23:25 3JX30ZP1.ML0 11 of 12 (19-Dec-05 23:25)
23:25 UDQHZ5RI.ML0 12 of 12 (19-Dec-05 23:25)
23:25 LVCLVKNO.ML0 1 of 2 (19-Dec-05 23:25)
23:25 YYU5KGLM.ML0 2 of 2 (19-Dec-05 23:25)
23:25 Processing done.
23:27 Processing started
23:27 M82D2VTC.ML0 1 of 11 (19-Dec-05 23:27)
23:27 UOJCM6R2.ML0 2 of 11 (19-Dec-05 23:27)
23:27 Z1Y17JO0.ML0 3 of 11 (19-Dec-05 23:27)
23:27 1NOPZ1F6.ML0 4 of 11 (19-Dec-05 23:27)
Mixmaster: No valid recipients. (deleted)
23:27 U0S2YSET.ML0 5 of 11 (19-Dec-05 23:27)
23:27 0CNSM5J1.ML0 6 of 11 (19-Dec-05 23:27)
23:27 OY6C7L4V.ML0 7 of 11 (19-Dec-05 23:27)
23:27 G6AN27VK.ML0 8 of 11 (19-Dec-05 23:27)
23:27 S2LGSBAA.ML0 9 of 11 (19-Dec-05 23:27)
23:27 GM72X4IP.ML0 10 of 11 (19-Dec-05 23:27)
23:27 9HZPJSPT.ML0 11 of 11 (19-Dec-05 23:27)
23:27 Processing done.
23:29 Processing started
23:29 VXPZYKDK.ML0 1 of 15 (19-Dec-05 23:29)
23:29 RB25OIV0.ML0 2 of 15 (19-Dec-05 23:29)
Mixmaster: No valid recipients. (deleted)
23:29 NLM37NTL.ML0 3 of 15 (19-Dec-05 23:29)
23:29 YESAAH7E.ML0 4 of 15 (19-Dec-05 23:29)
23:29 HAFLZ3EU.ML0 5 of 15 (19-Dec-05 23:29)
23:29 ZNDVHF7M.ML0 6 of 15 (19-Dec-05 23:29)
Plain message ()
23:29 5EOUSL9M.ML0 7 of 15 (19-Dec-05 23:29)
Mixmaster: No valid recipients. (deleted)
23:29 OQHFB750.ML0 8 of 15 (19-Dec-05 23:29)
23:29 NC7EZ5IU.ML0 9 of 15 (19-Dec-05 23:29)
23:29 649OP0DG.ML0 10 of 15 (19-Dec-05 23:29)
23:29 GAAANG9V.ML0 11 of 15 (19-Dec-05 23:29)
23:29 5ADH78ZE.ML0 12 of 15 (19-Dec-05 23:29)
23:29 2O6CSREF.ML0 13 of 15 (19-Dec-05 23:29)
23:29 FP7PFOXI.ML0 14 of 15 (19-Dec-05 23:29)
23:29 S6JO9VGR.ML0 15 of 15 (19-Dec-05 23:29)
23:30 Processing done.
23:32 Processing started
23:32 TF57ZWSP.ML0 1 of 13 (19-Dec-05 23:32)
23:32 OUNK4FAP.ML0 2 of 13 (19-Dec-05 23:32)
23:32 DTWATCZF.ML0 3 of 13 (19-Dec-05 23:32)
23:32 U1E6JO4O.ML0 4 of 13 (19-Dec-05 23:32)
23:32 SDGKV7S9.ML0 5 of 13 (19-Dec-05 23:32)
23:32 FNCH0J16.ML0 6 of 13 (19-Dec-05 23:32)
23:32 9CXNMAW3.ML0 7 of 13 (19-Dec-05 23:32)
23:32 NFE803JU.ML0 8 of 13 (19-Dec-05 23:32)
23:32 8XF4YBFH.ML0 9 of 13 (19-Dec-05 23:32)
23:32 GDUKOU36.ML0 10 of 13 (19-Dec-05 23:32)
23:32 AHMVJ63Y.ML0 11 of 13 (19-Dec-05 23:32)
Mixmaster: No valid recipients. (deleted)
23:32 UQFK3A47.ML0 12 of 13 (19-Dec-05 23:32)
23:32 QBINXOT5.ML0 13 of 13 (19-Dec-05 23:32)
23:32 Building stats
23:32 Processing done.
21:41 Sending 17 messages [31]
21:41 17 messages sent.
21:46 Sending 30 messages [44]
21:46 30 messages sent.
21:48 Sending 80 messages [94]
21:48 80 messages sent.
21:54 Sending 26 messages [38]
21:54 26 messages sent.
22:00 Sending 22 messages [34]
22:00 22 messages sent.
22:05 Sending 21 messages [32]
22:05 21 messages sent.
22:10 Sending 8 messages [19]
22:10 8 messages sent.
22:16 Sending 24 messages [34]
22:16 24 messages sent.
22:22 Sending 38 messages [48]
22:22 38 messages sent.
22:28 Sending 26 messages [36]
22:28 26 messages sent.
22:33 Sending 13 messages [23]
22:33 13 messages sent.
22:39 Sending 20 messages [30]
22:39 20 messages sent.
22:45 Sending 12 messages [21]
22:45 12 messages sent.
22:51 Sending 15 messages [24]
22:51 15 messages sent.
22:57 Sending 31 messages [38]
22:57 31 messages sent.
23:03 Sending 19 messages [25]
23:03 19 messages sent.
23:09 Sending 13 messages [18]
23:09 13 messages sent.
23:14 Sending 22 messages [26]
23:14 22 messages sent.
23:20 Sending 31 messages [34]
23:20 31 messages sent.
23:25 Sending 25 messages [28]
23:25 25 messages sent.
23:31 Sending 23 messages [25]
23:31 23 messages sent.
23:31:22: Job MG01A9D1: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:32:19: Job MG01A9D2: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:33:05: Job MG01A9D4: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:33:08: Job MG01A9D5: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:33:10: Job MG01A9D6: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:33:34: Job MG01A9D7: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:33:47: Job MG01A9D8: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:33:49: Job MG01A9D9: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:34:03: Job MG01A9DA: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:34:16: Job MG01A9DB: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:35:02: Job MG01A9DC: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:35:05: Job MG01A9DD: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:35:16: Job MG01A9DE: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:35:16: Job MG01A9DF: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:35:18: Job MG01A9E1: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:35:32: Job MG01A9E0: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:35:34: Job MG01A9E2: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:35:47: Job MG01A9E4: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:35:49: Job MG01A9E5: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:36:02: Job MG01A9E3: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:36:05: Job MG01A9E6: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:36:07: Job MG01A9E7: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:36:09: Job MG01A9E8: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:36:22: Job MG01A9E9: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:36:25: Job MG01A9EA: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:36:28: Job MG01A9EB: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:36:30: Job MG01A9EC: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:36:32: Job MG01A9ED: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:36:45: Job MG01A9EE: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:36:47: Job MG01A9EF: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:36:50: Job MG01A9F0: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:36:52: Job MG01A9F1: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:37:27: Job MG01A9F2: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
-=-
This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
.

User: "Enkidu The Girl Scout"

Title: Re: BS about KRP Forgeries 19 Dec 2005 10:57:16 PM
On 20 Dec 2005, Enkidu <jdwnx4702@sneakemail.com> wrote:

Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in
news:929e3978c60305c445c24015e70a3936@dizum.com:

Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address
above. It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the remailer
administrator at <abuse@dizum.com>. X-No-Archive: Yes


Nice try, Ken. We're not a bunch of 10 year old girl scouts, though.

I think you are now proven a 10 year old girl scout :) Fun having your name
forged, isn't it?
23:22 Processing started
23:22 LTUK96C6.ML0 1 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 B4N3F4ZA.ML0 2 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 KLF65WAU.ML0 3 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 4I5K6ITQ.ML0 4 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 EAMBU0IC.ML0 5 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
Mixmaster: No valid recipients. (deleted)
23:22 TFX4RMMG.ML0 6 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
Mixmaster: No valid recipients. (deleted)
23:22 KVTTMH9S.ML0 7 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
Mixmaster: No valid recipients. (deleted)
23:22 9VK8WTY8.ML0 8 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 VRDE1MZ3.ML0 9 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 DT6J229C.ML0 10 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
Mixmaster: No valid recipients. (deleted)
23:22 XLVN0YB7.ML0 11 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 9N02KIRZ.ML0 12 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 1RYG45P0.ML0 13 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 66AV9W40.ML0 14 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 0C93L5FK.ML0 15 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 F2XKR8ZT.ML0 16 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
Message moved to MAILPROB folder
ERROR Critical processing error
File not found (C:\Rel\Mail\MAILPROB\TMTRR4.rel)
23:22 ERROR Message Disposal Error
File not found
23:22 PJ3Y39U5.ML0 17 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 UC22DXQ2.ML0 18 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 DQB7BNVM.ML0 19 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
Mixmaster: No valid recipients. (deleted)
23:22 RIG2XGHB.ML0 20 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 O6SUSPLV.ML0 21 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
Mixmaster: No valid recipients. (deleted)
23:22 MVY12EVW.ML0 22 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 6P869IA2.ML0 23 of 23 (19-Dec-05 23:22)
23:22 Building stats
23:23 Processing done.
23:25 Processing started
23:25 FH3JOQFO.ML0 1 of 12 (19-Dec-05 23:25)
23:25 W7EZSE1U.ML0 2 of 12 (19-Dec-05 23:25)
Mixmaster: No valid recipients. (deleted)
23:25 V94IDT6B.ML0 3 of 12 (19-Dec-05 23:25)
23:25 4SVYW99U.ML0 4 of 12 (19-Dec-05 23:25)
23:25 OIYB8M8Q.ML0 5 of 12 (19-Dec-05 23:25)
23:25 6JPU8CI3.ML0 6 of 12 (19-Dec-05 23:25)
23:25 E0NBFW59.ML0 7 of 12 (19-Dec-05 23:25)
23:25 OHA1HQGR.ML0 8 of 12 (19-Dec-05 23:25)
23:25 HZRKSHFV.ML0 9 of 12 (19-Dec-05 23:25)
23:25 JQBIKLJJ.ML0 10 of 12 (19-Dec-05 23:25)
Mixmaster: No valid recipients. (deleted)
23:25 3JX30ZP1.ML0 11 of 12 (19-Dec-05 23:25)
23:25 UDQHZ5RI.ML0 12 of 12 (19-Dec-05 23:25)
23:25 LVCLVKNO.ML0 1 of 2 (19-Dec-05 23:25)
23:25 YYU5KGLM.ML0 2 of 2 (19-Dec-05 23:25)
23:25 Processing done.
23:27 Processing started
23:27 M82D2VTC.ML0 1 of 11 (19-Dec-05 23:27)
23:27 UOJCM6R2.ML0 2 of 11 (19-Dec-05 23:27)
23:27 Z1Y17JO0.ML0 3 of 11 (19-Dec-05 23:27)
23:27 1NOPZ1F6.ML0 4 of 11 (19-Dec-05 23:27)
Mixmaster: No valid recipients. (deleted)
23:27 U0S2YSET.ML0 5 of 11 (19-Dec-05 23:27)
23:27 0CNSM5J1.ML0 6 of 11 (19-Dec-05 23:27)
23:27 OY6C7L4V.ML0 7 of 11 (19-Dec-05 23:27)
23:27 G6AN27VK.ML0 8 of 11 (19-Dec-05 23:27)
23:27 S2LGSBAA.ML0 9 of 11 (19-Dec-05 23:27)
23:27 GM72X4IP.ML0 10 of 11 (19-Dec-05 23:27)
23:27 9HZPJSPT.ML0 11 of 11 (19-Dec-05 23:27)
23:27 Processing done.
23:29 Processing started
23:29 VXPZYKDK.ML0 1 of 15 (19-Dec-05 23:29)
23:29 RB25OIV0.ML0 2 of 15 (19-Dec-05 23:29)
Mixmaster: No valid recipients. (deleted)
23:29 NLM37NTL.ML0 3 of 15 (19-Dec-05 23:29)
23:29 YESAAH7E.ML0 4 of 15 (19-Dec-05 23:29)
23:29 HAFLZ3EU.ML0 5 of 15 (19-Dec-05 23:29)
23:29 ZNDVHF7M.ML0 6 of 15 (19-Dec-05 23:29)
Plain message ()
23:29 5EOUSL9M.ML0 7 of 15 (19-Dec-05 23:29)
Mixmaster: No valid recipients. (deleted)
23:29 OQHFB750.ML0 8 of 15 (19-Dec-05 23:29)
23:29 NC7EZ5IU.ML0 9 of 15 (19-Dec-05 23:29)
23:29 649OP0DG.ML0 10 of 15 (19-Dec-05 23:29)
23:29 GAAANG9V.ML0 11 of 15 (19-Dec-05 23:29)
23:29 5ADH78ZE.ML0 12 of 15 (19-Dec-05 23:29)
23:29 2O6CSREF.ML0 13 of 15 (19-Dec-05 23:29)
23:29 FP7PFOXI.ML0 14 of 15 (19-Dec-05 23:29)
23:29 S6JO9VGR.ML0 15 of 15 (19-Dec-05 23:29)
23:30 Processing done.
23:32 Processing started
23:32 TF57ZWSP.ML0 1 of 13 (19-Dec-05 23:32)
23:32 OUNK4FAP.ML0 2 of 13 (19-Dec-05 23:32)
23:32 DTWATCZF.ML0 3 of 13 (19-Dec-05 23:32)
23:32 U1E6JO4O.ML0 4 of 13 (19-Dec-05 23:32)
23:32 SDGKV7S9.ML0 5 of 13 (19-Dec-05 23:32)
23:32 FNCH0J16.ML0 6 of 13 (19-Dec-05 23:32)
23:32 9CXNMAW3.ML0 7 of 13 (19-Dec-05 23:32)
23:32 NFE803JU.ML0 8 of 13 (19-Dec-05 23:32)
23:32 8XF4YBFH.ML0 9 of 13 (19-Dec-05 23:32)
23:32 GDUKOU36.ML0 10 of 13 (19-Dec-05 23:32)
23:32 AHMVJ63Y.ML0 11 of 13 (19-Dec-05 23:32)
Mixmaster: No valid recipients. (deleted)
23:32 UQFK3A47.ML0 12 of 13 (19-Dec-05 23:32)
23:32 QBINXOT5.ML0 13 of 13 (19-Dec-05 23:32)
23:32 Building stats
23:32 Processing done.
21:41 Sending 17 messages [31]
21:41 17 messages sent.
21:46 Sending 30 messages [44]
21:46 30 messages sent.
21:48 Sending 80 messages [94]
21:48 80 messages sent.
21:54 Sending 26 messages [38]
21:54 26 messages sent.
22:00 Sending 22 messages [34]
22:00 22 messages sent.
22:05 Sending 21 messages [32]
22:05 21 messages sent.
22:10 Sending 8 messages [19]
22:10 8 messages sent.
22:16 Sending 24 messages [34]
22:16 24 messages sent.
22:22 Sending 38 messages [48]
22:22 38 messages sent.
22:28 Sending 26 messages [36]
22:28 26 messages sent.
22:33 Sending 13 messages [23]
22:33 13 messages sent.
22:39 Sending 20 messages [30]
22:39 20 messages sent.
22:45 Sending 12 messages [21]
22:45 12 messages sent.
22:51 Sending 15 messages [24]
22:51 15 messages sent.
22:57 Sending 31 messages [38]
22:57 31 messages sent.
23:03 Sending 19 messages [25]
23:03 19 messages sent.
23:09 Sending 13 messages [18]
23:09 13 messages sent.
23:14 Sending 22 messages [26]
23:14 22 messages sent.
23:20 Sending 31 messages [34]
23:20 31 messages sent.
23:25 Sending 25 messages [28]
23:25 25 messages sent.
23:31 Sending 23 messages [25]
23:31 23 messages sent.
23:31:22: Job MG01A9D1: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:32:19: Job MG01A9D2: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:33:05: Job MG01A9D4: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:33:08: Job MG01A9D5: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:33:10: Job MG01A9D6: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:33:34: Job MG01A9D7: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:33:47: Job MG01A9D8: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:33:49: Job MG01A9D9: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:34:03: Job MG01A9DA: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:34:16: Job MG01A9DB: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:35:02: Job MG01A9DC: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:35:05: Job MG01A9DD: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:35:16: Job MG01A9DE: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:35:16: Job MG01A9DF: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:35:18: Job MG01A9E1: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:35:32: Job MG01A9E0: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:35:34: Job MG01A9E2: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:35:47: Job MG01A9E4: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:35:49: Job MG01A9E5: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:36:02: Job MG01A9E3: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:36:05: Job MG01A9E6: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:36:07: Job MG01A9E7: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:36:09: Job MG01A9E8: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:36:22: Job MG01A9E9: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:36:25: Job MG01A9EA: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:36:28: Job MG01A9EB: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:36:30: Job MG01A9EC: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:36:32: Job MG01A9ED: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:36:45: Job MG01A9EE: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:36:47: Job MG01A9EF: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:36:50: Job MG01A9F0: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:36:52: Job MG01A9F1: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
23:37:27: Job MG01A9F2: from
(non-local)
To: remailer (local) -OK
.



  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER